Monday, May 29, 2023

Unicoin: Towards A Global Digital Currency

by Rich Peterson

Following the Windows Central announcement of ID2020, I had read of various types of identity management systems deployed throughout various countries.  The Windows Central article indicated that the ID2020 system would be global.  It would also integrate into a global economic system.

 “As more and more transactions become digital in nature and are built around a single global identification standard, supported by Microsoft, the question of who will govern this evolving global community and economy becomes relevant. Especially since nonparticipants in this system would be unable to buy or sell goods or services.

One aspect I questioned is how would different countries having their own digital identity systems integrate into this same global economic system. The answer I found was with the World Bank. World Bank developed an application programming interface (API) to function as overlay for all the identity management systems.   

I similarly questioned monetary policy which would have far greater implications and complexities. I’ve long read of the plan is to replace fiat currency with central bank digital currencies.  Former National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice is a strong advocate for the United States’ development of a digital currency, the premise being it serves our national security.  To Rice’s credit she acknowledges there are  authoritarian dangers, nevertheless she believes the government would refrain from such behavior.

Last month the Digital Currency Monetary Authority announced Unicoin which similarly would overlay, or integrate, monetary units. More coverage here, here, and here.



Given the BRICS nations are working to dislodge the US dollar as the world currency reserve, an overlay to the world’s digital currencies would serve as rationale to unify various digital currencies.   More on BRICS here.

The backbone of digital currency is blockchain technology where every transaction is permanently recorded. Rather than me writing of the dangers of such system, I recommend listening to the below video (the conversation on the DCMA follows minute 10). I fully agree with this man’s analysis.

 



 

430 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   401 – 430 of 430
Anonymous said...

Who paid Joe Biden $10 MILLION and WHY?

The American people deserve to know. Fess up Big Guy!

Anonymous said...

I'm absolutely sure X will be calling the FBI, demanding that those 17 phone calls, 2 directly involving the Big Guy, be released. Why do I say that? Because I know X loves the truth and is not a hypocrite.

Anonymous said...

The LA Dodgers to honor 'Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence' at Pride night (tonight, June 16th)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTNF35tunMM

Peaceful demonstrations are planned against this drag group of trans-NUNS... who say that this anti-Catholic group promotes hatred... as they MOCK Jesus, while labeling their 'parody' as 'satire'.

How is this being ALLOWED to occur? Imagine the outcry if this was a group MOCKING the Muslim faith, or the Jewish faith.

It is widely believed that if devout Catholic Vin Scully was still alive, this would NOT be happening!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vin_Scully

Anonymous said...

4:03 PM

Why is the Pope silent about this? He'd have a lot more influence than a 100 Vin Scullys.

Anonymous said...

3:05 pm

I’m fine with that.

I doubt they exist just as the FBI and Trumps DOJ doubted the claims had any legitimacy but if the do exist and reveal criminality then prosecute him/them

I find it humorous you think the phone call recordings need to be released as if the FBI possesses those supposed recordings. There is no evidence the exist other than the words of a Ukrainian fugitive (most speculate he is the untrustworthy source of the tip).

I’m sure you feel the same way about Trumps crimes including all his sexual assaults. If he is a criminal he’s not above the law.

X

X

Anonymous said...

If Biden is proven to be a criminal, along with his family, should they be above the law?

There is NO DOUBT the recordings exist. Of course, you're in the 100% Biden Crime Family denial mode, so you can't go there.

Anonymous said...

“No doubt” you say?????

“GOP Senator Admits Biden Bribery Tapes Might Not Exist After All:
Chuck Grassley was at the forefront of pushing these claims to begin with.”

https://newrepublic.com/post/173689/gop-senator-admits-no-idea-biden-tapes-keeps-talking-exist

Excerpt: “Republican Senator Chuck Grassley admitted that he doesn’t actually know if the audio recordings that he said reveal Joe Biden accepting a bribe even exist.

Republicans have spent all week accusing the president of accepting a bribe from Ukraine (conveniently at the same time Donald Trump was arrested for stealing and hiding classified documents) and referring specifically to a set of recordings that prove their claim. The GOP learned about these supposed recordings as part of the House Oversight Committee’s months-long investigation into the Biden family, which has yet to produce any actual evidence linking Biden to wrongdoing.



But speaking on a podcast Wednesday, Grassley admitted he doesn’t know whether or not the tapes are real.”


X


Anonymous said...

Also… 2 b clear. Again. Biden is not above the law. I highly doubt a well seasoned politician like Biden conducted any intentional criminal activity let alone millions in bribery over a phone call but if real evidence is brought forward demonstrating such in a court of law (or other irrefutable evidence such as Trumps confessions he knowingly illegally retained government secrets thereby committing acts of espionage and conspiracy to cover up acts of espionage) I’m fine with him going to prison for such or any other appropriate criminal sanction.


X

Anonymous said...

Thousands of protestors block entrance to Dodgers Stadium last night (June 16th) as team honors group of 'Godless' and 'Christ-mocking' queer and trans nuns in front of nearly empty stands for Pride Night

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/mlb/article-12204993/Hundreds-gather-outside-Dodgers-Stadium-protest-teams-godless-support-LGBTQ-nuns.html

___________________________________________________________________________________________


Loved seeing all those empty seats since the Dodgers organization failed to 'read the room'...

Final Score: God - 1; Dodgers - 0

(Looks like there IS 'crying in baseball' after all.)

Anonymous said...

To 12:07 PM

Re: "Loved seeing all those empty seats since the Dodgers organization failed to 'read the room'"


Absolutely!!! The Los Angeles Dodgers has MUCHO Hispanic Catholic baseball fans... or should I say HAD?

Anonymous said...

Craig,

Here are articles with links to several studies and a discussion debunking all of Anthony Watts' claims about surface station temperature error. Interesting that even a study HE, himself, co-authored (the Fall study) concluded that the temperature data was sound.


Watts, Surface Stations and BEST

https://skepticalscience.com/WattsandBEST.html


Here's a Twitter thread from 2019 debunking Anthony Watts and the Heartland Institute's persistent use of USCRN data in an attempt to fraudelenty demonstrate, by comparison that the NASA GISS data is inaccurate and that there has been no warming over a short period of 17 years (i.e. cherry picking) when the actual temperature chart DOES show significant warming (especially when you filter out the monthly noise).


The climate skeptics at @HeartlandInst have been promoting this graph from the state-of-the-art US Climate Reference Network (CRN), claiming it shows no warming for 14 years. Ironically, their graph shows literally the exact opposite thing they are claiming. A quick thread:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1169805837704937472.html


x

p.s. - When watching the watts video again I took note of this observation from the article: "Rather than draw readers' attention to the hot spots, I would invite readers to compare the color (temperature) of the [shielded] instrument housing with the color (temperature) of the general surroundings. In each case, the temperature station casing is - despite being near a source of heat - at the same temperature as the nearby land." So Watts' biases can be demonstrated using his own photos.

Anonymous said...

Hunter Biden's Business Partner Devon Archer Cooperating With GOP

"Devon Archer certainly is a person of interest in our investigation," Comer told "Rob Schmitt Tonight." "He was someone that was on the inside with the Biden family. He knows exactly the level of participation that Joe Biden had within his family's influence-peddling schemes, and we just want to give him an opportunity to tell us exactly what he knows about what the Bidens did to receive all this money that they're getting from countries all around the world and what level of involvement Joe Biden had."

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/hunter-biden-devon-archerrepublicans/2023/06/16/id/1123881/?

Anonymous said...

In this video, Dr Susan Oliver looks at why people believe misinformation and conspiracy theories and what motivates grifters to spread them.

Why do people believe and spread misinformation?

https://youtu.be/LdvKUBrRxxM

Craig said...

X,

The post you reference by "logicman" is not accounting for the specific points in the vlog I presented earlier. To whit, one of Watts' points is the position of the station relative to other objects, including pavement, etc., which generally produce artificially HIGH readings. A perfectly good site a couple decades ago becomes one in which the readings become too high because of encroachment of suburbia, e.g. and etc.

You may or may not recall an anonymous poster here who would occasionally sign as "physicist" when either speaking on things of a scientific nature or when countering other posts which needed correcting in some manner. "Physicist" was a proponent of Watts' site wattsupwiththat, and he demurred at the then "global warming" hysteria. I know of one other (former) commenter here who was able to confirm that he (she?) was indeed a physicist, though preferring not to reveal his true identity. I'm sure you can relate to the latter, at least.

By process of elimination, based on your own comments, we're assured you are no physicist and your doctorate is not related to climatology.

Craig said...

X,

Allow me to better state my position @ 2:40 PM. Let's take one site in anytown, USA. In 1970 the site was on the outskirts of maintown. In 2020 maintown had enveloped anytown. If we were to have moved continually moved the site to the outskirts of the enlarged maintown to the point in which the distance between it and maintown remained the same as it was in 1970, then we can be assured the readings of 1970 and 2020 are comparable. That is, if 2020 is indeed indicating a warmer temperature, then this temperature is that much warmer than 1970--because the variables remained the same.

There's probably a more succinct way of stating this, but I think you'll get my point.

Now, with a growing global population, it stands to reason that global temps will increase, all things being equal. More people, more heat, because of the increase in people themselves and the increased infrastructure for said people (more homes, more roads, etc.). But the REAL question is: To what extent is fossil fuel use in and of itself responsible for this warming? Climate alarmists claim anthropogenic global warming is caused directly and primarily by fossil fuel usage. Proof? How can they possibly divide out normal climate variability from fossil fuel usage? This is, essentially, Dr. Curry's question.

Anonymous said...

Trump Arrest EXPOSED - the REAL STORY They're Not Telling You

youtube.com/watch?v=45vqf9GwUgc

Anonymous said...

HORROR: Pregnant Woman Shot and Killed at Seattle Intersection

thegatewaypundit.com/2023/06/pregnant-woman-shot-killed-seattle-intersection/

Anonymous said...

DYSTOPIAN NIGHTMARE: 10 things that will happen soon if we don’t stop the march of tyranny and the enslavement of humanity

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-06-16-dystopian-nightmare-10-things-that-will-happen-soon.html#

Anonymous said...

People believe information from the ALTERNATIVE media, because information from the lamestream news media defies logic and common sense... and, more often than not, is absolute BULL S---!!!

Anonymous said...

10 Very Important Questions We Should Be Asking Right Now

discernmentreport.com/10-very-important-questions-that-we-should-all-be-asking-right-now/

Anonymous said...

Craig,

You are arguing "common sense". That's why Watts uses this argument because lay people (like us) fall for it. It follows and makes sense.

Problem is...it's not represenative of ALL the ways temperature and warming is measured AND science already looked into this and debunked the claim. Anthony Watts is aware of such science having even authored one of the papers which demonstrated that the shielded temperature gauge data was not corrupted. He even committed to trust the outcome of the BEST study which was, I think, designed to support his claim IF the data in fact was supported it...with all data made public.

Even when you look at a few of the infra-red images he utilized in his vlog you can see the shielded box is not registering the same heat signature of the ambient heat around it. It is black matching the temperature of the ground (i.e.- ground temperature).

Finally, science can and does adjust for such anomolies. There is no reason such boxes couldn't give completely accurate results for ground temperature at dawn, dusk, midnight and cloudy/rainy days.

At some point you have to ask why isn't the oil, gas and coal industry pouring money into legitimate climate research versus pouring money into the republican't party as well as funding former tobacco industry misinforming think tanks designed simply to shape and cloud up public trust in science and tie such political propaganda into "conservatism".

If science were really on their side...why the subterfuge?

x

Watt

Craig said...

X @ 9:03 PM,

The shielded box must not be shielded to the point that it does not allow anything to obstruct the gauge itself. That said, the common sense argument is all we need. If variables have changed, then we are comparing apples with oranges. The UHI comes into play when the stations are encroached. The ambient temperature WILL change to reflect its hotter surroundings.



Anonymous said...

Craig,

"Common sense" is not a valid scientific argument, especially when science, again and again, debunks such "common sense". They even acknowledge they are good skeptical questions and address such specifically.


From the independent BEST website:

Informed skeptics have rightly raised several common sense concerns about the historical temperature compiled by climate scientists. Those issues were investigated by an independent group of scientists who were concerned about the accuracy of previous work. This is what they found:

Data Selection Bias: Using only a small sample of available data was a problem. When the independent study used essentially all the data, they extended the record and improved it substantially.

Urban heat island effect: Urban areas can be substantially warmer than adjacent rural areas. Critics were concerned that the record might be biased and that the warming recorded was actually due to increased urbanization rather than climate change. The independent study excluded all urban areas and even rural areas near urban ones, resulting in a data set unbiased by the “urban heat island effect.”

Data Adjustments: In some cases, the historical records have undergone adjustments to account for changes in observation practices. Critics were rightly suspicious of these adjustments. The independent study took a hands-off approach and put all their programs and data online for others to try.

Poor station quality: Surveys of temperature stations in the U.S. indicated that many stations may be inaccurate. The independent study compared good and poor quality stations, and determined that although absolute temperatures were sometimes biased, the poor stations gave accurate estimates of temperature changes.

When the independent study corrected for all of these issues, it confirmed that the world has warmed 1.5oC, or 2.8oF, over the past 250 years.


Source: https://berkeleyearth.org/dv/global-temperature-anomaly-from-1850-2022/

Craig said...

X,

The argument exactly as I laid it out is common sense. If you change any of the variables of ANY measurement/practice, you obscure the results.


Well, we can be assured the study was "independent", given that the outcome is exactly what was desired. Imagine that.

This looks to be a case of moving the goal posts. Who would deny there's been warming over the past 250 years? We came out of the Little Ice Age (LIA) ca. 1880, and there's been a general warming trend since then--though temps were cooler from ~1940s to 1970s, such that there were calls of an impending ice age. But I digress. I have no trouble believing the earth has warmed 1.5oC since ~1770, for at that time the earth was in the midst of the LIA.

I suspect the "Data Adjustments" raised historical temps, due to the so-called 'time of temperature taking bias', as Tony Heller has mentioned a few times in his vlogs. Were any of these "Data Adjustments" downward?

Did this study show that the cumulative readings remained the same? I.e, the UHI had absolutely no effect on any reading?

I suspect this is worded this way in order to equivocate on the term "climate change": Critics were concerned that the record might be biased and that the warming recorded was actually due to increased urbanization rather than climate change. But, hey, I'm a skeptic.

No one is disputing that certain years have been warmer than others. The question is: How much did UHI, e.g., account for said warming?

X, stop being such an obvious shill for green energy.

Anonymous said...

https://www.9news.com.au/national/blockade-australia-activist-shuts-down-port-of-newcastle-coal-operation/c1cd7b46-0015-46cc-b16d-156f00db5818


Will somebody please take the greenie's perks away so they can do without air conditioning in hot Australia?

Anonymous said...

Same old, different day.
x shills for every single globalist narrative there is because x is New Age from stem to stern.

That self-aggrandizing troll is a saint that ain't.
A keyboard social justice warrior of the globalist kind.

Dawn said...

Timing is everything and remember never let a good crisis go to waste. If you don’t have a crisis - create one. Anyway, the fall of cryptocurrency is all tied into government introducing their own CBDC. This will be a control mechanism tied to carbon emissions, social media post et al.

cheapescortsinlondon.com/ said...

wyglądasz smakowicie, dziękuję to jest mój ulubiony :)

https://boaescorts.com/cheap-escorts/ said...

Bardzo smaczny sernik, dzieci były zadowolone - https://v-i-v-a.com/

Anonymous said...


ukpeachy.com/

«Oldest ‹Older   401 – 430 of 430   Newer› Newest»