Sunday, July 29, 2007

"Sound Off" with John W. Spring internet radio

Dear Friends:

I am scheduled to be interviewed tonight (Sunday, July 29, 2007) from 11 to midnight Eastern Time (8 p.m. to 9 p.m.) on "Sound Off", the John W. Spring live radio program. It is on various small stations about the country and also live on the internet at The chatroom will be open as will be a live 800 number for questions. Please join us! Topics I think will be included are: (1) The Real ID Act of 2005; (2) EU and Javier Solana; (3) the New Age Movement.



Wednesday, July 25, 2007

The EU Deal

NOTE TO MY PERSPECTIVE listeners: My guest tomorrow, this Saturday, 11 a.m. Pacific time, 2 p.m. USA Eastern time will be Los Angeles political commentator and talk show host, John W. Spring. We will be discussing our mutual concerns on the Real ID Act of 2005, its ramifications and implementation. Your participation in the chatroom is invited -- even urged. This is an important program and only complete public education on this subject has any prospect of slowing its insidious progression. PLEASE JOIN US! Dr. Stanley Monteith will be with us a week from Saturday.

Click on link to open below story; click on picture below to enlarge for readable size!


The European Union Deal

July 25, 2007
by Constance Cumbey
A article
edited and revised 7-26-2007 for my blogspot readers

On a random internet search, looking frankly for something else I never found, I just discovered an off the road lovely little blogspot maintained by one of Javier Solana’s most obvious London based thinktanks: The Centre for European Reform. A few years ago, Herb Peters and I laughed on live radio air at a $10,000 award two of its foremost analysts, Charles Grant and Steve Everts received from the prestigious New York City based Foreign Policy Association for winning an essay competition for ideas on how to better manage “Transatlantic Relations” in its alleged “growing divide.” Their prize-winning thoughts:

  • Give Javier Solana more power;

  • Give Javier Solana more money;

  • Give Javier Solana more staff.
We joked on the air over WMUZ radio in Detroit on my then regular program, “Law Talk,” “Now why didn’t we think of that? We could have had $10,000 to divide by writing the obviously desired lines of other power elites: “Give Javier Solana more power, more money, and more staff.”

Grant/Everts’ exact essay wording was “Streamline decision-making and give Javier Solana more resources.” Quoting from their prize winning essay:

By all accounts, Solana has been a great success. He has put the EU on the map,
in the Balkans, the Middle East and elsewhere. The time has come to give him a
formal right of initiative. Doing so would put him at the same level as the
Commission and the member-states. It is clear that EU foreign policy would be
more impressive if all sides worked better together – and if the EU could take
decisions more easily. One way to achieve both these objectives would be to
promote more joint initiatives. The EU should decide that if the High
Representative and the Commissioner for external relations agreed on a joint
proposal, then EU foreign ministers should accept it if a qualified majority
voted in favor. Because Solana has such excellent links with the capitals, he
would filter out any idea that he knew was too controversial. Similarly,
involving the Commission at an early stage in the policy process can ensure that
its extensive resources are used to support the EU’s diplomatic strategy. . . .
In any case, Solana needs more resources. The EU needs to triple the CFSP budget
– to the still modest sum of €120 million. EU leaders routinely say they want
Europe to assert itself more strongly on the global stage. But then they balk at
the financial consequences. Clearly, the EU cannot develop a credible foreign
policy ‘on the cheap’. Solana also needs more people working for him. In the
short term this means stationing more national diplomats in Brussels. In the
medium term, the EU should create its own diplomatic service. EU diplomats
should shuttle between the Brussels,the capitals and the Commission delegations
outside the EU. They should gradually take the lead in blending national
perspectives on international problems. Developing shared analyses is the best
way to ensure that member-states also agree on the necessary policy responses.”

Co-author Steven Everts thereafter not surprisingly left the CER to take a position on Javier Solana’s cabinet. Charles Grant stayed behind, also to the benefit of Javier Solana. The CER ideas were instrumental in shaping notions that would be incorporated in shaping Javier Solana’s to be all powerful Foreign Minister post in the failed European Constitutional drive.
Now his compatriot Charles Grant and company are working hard to shame Great Britain into accepting the deals made on the new “Treaty” cum constitution in drag. This is what Grant says are the main features of “the Treaty”:

· A semi-permanent president of the Council will replace the 6-monthly rotating presidency. The various formations of the Council of Ministers will still be chaired by the rotating presidency.
· The exception is the Council of Foreign Ministers, which will be chaired by the new High Representative for EU Foreign and Security Policy (this post is a merger of those held by the current High Representative, Javier Solana, and the
commissioner for external relations, Benita Ferrero-Waldner).
· A new double-majority voting system for the Council of Ministers, under which a decision is passed when it is backed by 55% of the members-states, so long as these represent 65% of the EU’s population.
· The powers of both national parliaments and the European Parliament in EU law-making will be strengthened.
· From 2014 onwards, the Commission will only have 18 members (the seats will rotate among the 28 EU member-states, with Croatia likely to join before 2014).

When there was obviously popular rejection by the peoples of the affected countries themselves to this acknowledged “democratic deficit” power grab, new scheming began. That culminated in the recent treaty meetings and there seems to be an obvious “the people be damned” approach to it. British elements are trying frantically to force a referendum. Eurocrats and global elitists are frantically trying to stop one from happening.

Obviously, what is being framed here is much larger than simply Europe. Why else would a USA based group hand $10,000 for a simply worded essay that suggests handing one man, Javier Solana, such unilateral power and control?

In my 26 years of researching the New Age Movement and 12 years of researching Dr. Javier Solana and his roles in Middle East processes, NATO, the European Union, and now “global governance,” I have learned that those advocating all of the above play a lovely little game of “now you see us, now you don’t.”

Charles Grant, the obvious Javier Solana partisan who stayed behind at the CER think tank while his writing partner, Steve Everts went on to be a part of Dr. Solana’s EU cabinet emphatically insists that Britain does not need a referendum. [1]

Impugning noble intent to this Brussels power grab, Charles Grant prefaces the report by saying:

Thank goodness for the agreement in Brussels last night. Without a deal, the EU
would have been mired in arguments on treaties, institutions and process for a
prolonged period. Now, hopefully, the Union can move on to deal with real
problems in the real world, such as climate change, energy security, Kosovo, the
revival of Russian power, and so on.

The English based CER has plenty of praises for Germany’s Angela Merkel and her Foreign Minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier for expediting the process. At the same time, they appear unduly anxious to hand inordinate powers to one man in what appears to be one of the greatest “trust me” games in history.

My mother told me never to trust somebody who says “trust me.” I would never say never, but I would definitely say that when one is very anxious that you forego a referendum, I would personally double my caution.

What are the terms of this “treaty” that the CER is so anxious for the British to uncritically accept, sans referendum? Why are some on the USA side of the “Atlantic pond” so anxious to hand one man in charge so much power, money, and staff?

Fortunately, some of our British cousins appear to be waking up. According to EU Referendum, a spot I permanently link to from my personal blogspot, at least one member of the House of Lords has called a spade a spade:

“. . . the new trade minister Digby, Lord Jones, who says, ‘this is a con to
call this a treaty - it's not. It's exactly the same - it's a constitution.’"

Of course, the CER has attempted, as is usually the practice when one observes New World Order items in implementation before pronouncing them “a done deal” to characterize the objectors as humorless. An article on their blogspot alluded to just that, “of mice, men, and European Reform” by Hugo Brady. Much more fascinating were the critical comments more discerning readers placed under the pro-Treaty blog:

    • Anonymous said...
      Do you regard the new version of the constitution as being radically different to the original? If so why are all of the following wrong?

    • Germany “The substance of the constitution is preserved. That is a
      fact.” (Angela Merkel, German Chancellor, Telegraph, 29 June 2007)

    • Ireland “90 per cent of it is still there... these changes haven't made any dramatic
      change to the substance of what was agreed back in 2004.” (Bertie Ahern, Irish
      Taoiseach, Irish Independent, 24 June 2007)

    • Czech Republic “Only cosmetic changes have been made and the basic document remains the same.” (Vaclav Klaus, Czech President, Guardian, 13 June 2007)

    • Spain “A great part of the content of the European Constitution is captured in the new treaties.” (Jose Zapatero, Spanish PM, El Pais 23 June 2007)

    • Finland “There’s nothing from the original institutional package that has been changed.” (Astrid Thors, Finnish Europe Minister, TV-Nytt, 23 June 2007)

    • Denmark “The good thing is...that all the symbolic elements are gone, and that which really matters – the core – is left.” (Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Danish PM, Jyllands-Posten, 25 June 2007)

    • Austria “The original Treaty for a Constitution was maintained in substance.” (Austrian government website, 25 June 2007)

    • Belgium The new treaty “takes up the most important elements of the constitutional treaty project.” (Guy Verhofstadt, Belgian PM, Agence Europe, 24 June 2007)

    • Italy “As for our conditions… I outlined four red lines with respect to the text of the Constitution: to keep a permanent president of the EU, to keep the single overseer for foreign policy and a common diplomatic service, to keep the extension of majority voting, to keep the single legal personality of the Union. All of this has stayed.” (Romano Prodi, Italian PM, La Repubblica, 24 June 2007)

    • Lithuania Lithuania has “100 percent fulfilled the tasks set forth before the meeting, including the primary objective of preserving the substance of the Constitutional Treaty.” (Office of the President of Lithuania, official press release)
      Luxembourg “The substance has been preserved from Luxembourg’s point of view.” (Jean-Claude Juncker, Luxembourg PM, Agence Europe, 24 June)
      Slovenia With the new treaty, the EU gets “content that is not essentially different from the constitutional treaty… All key institutional solutions remain… Some symbolic elements will be cleared up and some formulations toned down.” (Janez Jansa, Slovenian PM, 23 June 2007, Slovenian Government Communication Office)

    • The European Commission “It’s essentially the same proposal as the old
      Constitution.” (Margot Wallstrom, EU Commissioner, Svenska Dagbladet, 26 June

    • The author of the EU Constitution “This text is, in fact, a rerun of a
      great part of the substance of the Constitutional Treaty.” (Valery Giscard
      d’Estaing, Telegraph, 27 June 2007)

    • European Parliament The European
      Parliament “welcomes the fact that the mandate safeguards the substance of the
      Constitutional treaty.” (European Parliament resolution, 10 July 2007)

Well, as a famous wit once said, “A rose by any other name is still a rose.” And I might add that “a skunk by any other name is still a skunk.” And tyranny by any other polite moniker such as “democratic deficit” is still tyranny.

I don’t want to tell my British cousins what to do, but if I were them, I would stick to my guns and demand that referendum. They have nothing to lose but their national identities and their freedoms! And ditto here in the USA where we have the not so subtle pushes for “global governance,” also under the “benevolent” guidance of Dr. Solana aided by the Brookings Institution, Stanford University, New York University, and with the apparent blessings of even our USA State Department.

I often tell my law practice clients, “there are two things one should never rush into: one is marriage and the other is divorce.” I think on a national and global scale, we should be very cautious about rushing into a union we may well live to regret. If the prophesied revelations are true, and given the present objective evidence, I cannot help but believe they are, truly union with this global governance scheme will be ultimately and tragically regretted by many.

May the Lord help us all and may the Lord now especially give wisdom and discernment especially to the more immediately affected Europeans as they face this ultimate insult to their long held identities, all presumably in the name of “peace and safety.”

1, "We do not need a referendum: The new treaty agreed by EU members last night does not change the way Britain is governed or transfer significant powers to Europe" by Charles Grant, Published in the Guardian blog, 23 June 2007 Article by Steven Grant,
© 2007 - Constance Cumbey - All Rights Reserved

Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale

Blog Spot:


Monday, July 23, 2007

Radio Schedule for Coming Saturday

NOTE TO MY PERSPECTIVE listeners: My guest next Saturday, 11 a.m. Pacific time, 2 p.m. USA Eastern time will be Los Angeles political commentator and talk show host, John W. Spring. We will be discussing our mutual concerns on the Real ID Act of 2005, its ramifications and implementation. Your participation in the chatroom is invited -- even urged. This is an important program and only complete public education on this subject has any prospect of slowing its insidious progression. PLEASE JOIN US! Dr. Stanley Monteith will be with us a week from Saturday.

Blair vs. Solana?

Trouble in Jerusalem?

Tony Blair vs. Javier Solana?

Tony Blair has departed from his ten year held British Prime Ministership. His old job is now held by Gordon Brown. Over, it was said, the displeasure of Javier Solana, European foreign policy and security chief, Tony Blair was given a position as The Quartet's envoy to the Middle East. This happened with the active backing of George Bush. Javier Solana was said to have unhappily gone along. Later it was announced that per Javier Solana, Tony Blair would have no power to mediate Middle East Israeli-Palestinian disputes.

As Prime Minister of England, Tony Blair and his lawyer wife, Cheri Blair, unquestionably became used to "living large." As a couple, they also while professing a form of Christian allegiances, flew their New Age flags flagrantly and blatantly. In Mexico, they participated in a New Age initiation ceremony that consisted of them taking the personalities of animal spirits and bowing to the four elements.

Now that Tony Blair has his new job which as I understand it now is basically to be a promoter to attract business opportunities to economically strengthen the region to the benefit of Israelis and Palestinians alike, he is again planning to "live large." According to a recent press release, he is viewing what is described as "a palace" with an eye to making that his Jerusalem home.

He is said to be keen to take over the one-time residence of the British High Commissioner for Palestine, with its ballroom and spectacular view of the golden dome of Al-Aqsa mosque.

The house, built of Jerusalem stone in 1931, was once the pride of British diplomacy and occupies a commanding position in West Jerusalem on the inauspiciously named Hill of Evil Counsel, where Judas is said to have negotiated his betrayal of Jesus. It has acres of lush gardens filled with delphiniums, roses and trees. After the British mandate ended in 1948, it was taken over by the United Nations.

The same article tells what we already know. Neither Blair nor Solana are happy about the present structure. It appears that Tony Blair is not happy with its limitations. It appears that Javier Solana is not happy with Blair's new job existing at all.

It should be very interesting to see this one play out. Stay tuned! Presently, I'm betting that Javier Solana will come out on top, but then, who knows?

Saturday, July 21, 2007


"Solana seeks revival; "Europe needs to speak with one voice" (wonder whose?) Click on picture to enlarge and/or read about it here at this "tinyurl" link:


More more information, click here or follow this link:

Friday, July 20, 2007


Listen and interact via the chatroom live with me Saturday, July 21, 2007 at 11 a.m. Pacific time, 2 p.m. Eastern Time at! Holly Pivec, daughter of Herb Peters, is our first hour guest!

MEANWHILE BACK ON THE ISRAELI FRONT: Israel's historically most New Age president, Socialist activist Shimon Peres, the man who signed the original Treaty of Association with Javier Solana and the EU on November 20, 1995, two days before I came upon these players, is once again the President of Israel and working enthusiastically with Javier Solana . You may link to it by clicking: Holly Peters Pivec also has links to it on Things are happening SO VERY FAST! Stay tuned!

Friday, July 20, 2007
8:08 AM
BY Constance E. Cumbey


If a very recent British newspaper article is to be believed, Great Britain may soon surrender its permanent Security Council seat at the UN to the European Union’s Javier Solana. According to EU Referendum blogspot, Great Britain won’t lose their Security Council seat, nor will France, but the EU will instead have its own seat. Britain and/or France will have to defer to the EU and remain silent at the UN Security Council, should an issue arise on which the EU has taken a “common position.” [1] Whichever version of this is true, it will unquestionably mean a much greater role for him ( or any successor) on the world stage. Since October 1999, Solana has headed European foreign and military policy. He also serves as Secretary General of the European Union Council of Ministers. Also, since November 20, 1999, Solana has headed the Western European Union, a ten permanent member military federation. That was to have been a “temporary” one year stint, but I cynically note that the “year” has lasted a very long time and that job is still in existence. Solana uses the WEU job for holding military-industrial confabs that might not be as non-controversially available to him in other venues. [2] Since assuming his initial EU governmental roles, his powers have steadily grown. He now is playing an obviously prominent role in “global governance” as well.

Quoting from that article as it appears in the British Telegraph on line today, July 20, 2007:

The British government had claimed that powers for the EU foreign policy supremo, rechristened a High Representative, have been reduced and his UN role stripped from the new treaty. , , However, an EU official confirmed: "We retain, except for the name of the minister, the Constitutional Treaty text of 2004 including the provisions on the UN. , , "There is a provision which provides for the representative of the EU to state the position of the EU at the UN Security Council." , , The Government had insisted that negotiations on the treaty had ensured that the British presence on the Security Council would never be replaced by an EU representative. However, the text provides for the British seat to be occupied by an EU minister when the bloc has a united position on issues. , , Mr Hague, the shadow foreign secretary, has criticised Gordon Brown for allowing "one of the most damaging and important provisions in the rejected EU Constitution" to be resurrected after referendums by the French and Dutch two years ago voted against it[i][3]

My personal tracking of Javier Solana began in late November, 1995 – November 22 to be precise. As a culmination of his dual six month rotating presidencies of the European Union and Western European Union, Solana executed and signed a comprehensive Treaty of Association with Israel on November 20, 1995.[4] Only one week later, he would preside over the first Barcelona Conference designed to battle religious fundamentalism, set the stage for a Mediterranean Free Trade zone to be launched in 2010, and eliminate and/or reduce USA presence in the Mediterranean. Two days after the conclusion of that conference, he would be unanimously selected as a “dark horse candidate” to the disappointment of former Dutch president Ruud Lubbers who aspired to the job, to be the new Secretary General of NATO.[5] More surprisingly still was that this NATO job came to him only a scant few months after he dispatched Spanish warships against the Canada he declared a virtual state of war against.

While still at NATO, Javier Solana was given unusual grants of power for that usually ministerial type job – the sole power to decide if and when bombs should fall on the former Yugoslavia. Few Americans paid attention when President Clinton declared on national USA TV on March 21, 1999, “I agree with Javier Solana’s decision to do this.” I heard no news person ever ask, “Who’s Javier Solana?”

Solana's first EU positions, apart from the rotating jobs he held before taking over NATO in December 1995 were Secretary General of the Council of Ministers of the European Union; Office of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union, were created by the EU Council of Ministers in December 1998 with the curiously numbered Europa codified Section 666. His job is indexed at Europa under that number.[6] As many who have followed my previous writings about Dr. Solana (he holds a University of Virginia physics doctorate) know, after receiving these powers he used his Western European Union seat to propose even more, also curiously named and numbered “Recommendation 666.”[7]

Subsequent to that, among many other grants of authority, Mr. Solana has been deemed the only person suitable to give orders to shut down the Galileo Satellite System of the EU, headquartered at Torrejon, Spain, “in case of emergency.”[8]

Conceding that 666 job establishing Europa code section numbering may have been accidental, Javier Solana was shortly after taking that job, also placed in charge of the ten nation permanent member Western European Union. This happened on or about November 20, 1999. A lavish global governance party was held at the Palermo, Italy, luxurious New York University Law School owned villa. It was formerly the property of Sir Harold Acton. Page 666 of Sidney Blumenthal's book, records another global elite event. On November 20, 1999, just about the same time, maybe the very same day that Javier Solana was handed the ten national Western European Union presidency, a star studded dinner was held. The event happened near Florence, Italy. Sidney Blumenthal acted as toastmaster. That night, November 20, 1999, the Clintons, the Blairs, Gerhard Schroeder, and so many other world elites were in attendance at it, the Villa La Pietra. So was Javier Solana. He is specifically mentioned on that interestingly, perhaps coincidentally, perhaps not numbered page 666 of the Blumenthal book, THE CLINTON WARS.

"The Villa la Pietra is a sixty room, fifteenth century mansion containing priceless art works and surrounded by acres of manicured Tuscan gardens filled with statuary. Through the pines, more than a mile in the distance, can be seen Brunelleschi's magnificent dome on Florence's Duomo. At La Pietra on November 20, 1999, a dinner was held to open a summit meeting of the Third Way Movement -- Progressive Governance in the Twenty-first Century. . . . "Around the tables sat European Commission president Romano Prodi, European foreign minister Javier Solana, Director-General of the International Labor Organization Juan Somavia, Prime Minister Tony Blair, Prime Minister Allesso D'Alema, Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, Prime Minister Lionel Jospin, and President Fernando Henrique Cardoso, President of Brazil. . . Under the auspices of New York University and the European University Institute in Florence, prominent intellectuals from the United States and Europe joined the party. . . "[9]

Topping all of this was the entertainment. Famed blind Italian tenor Andre Botticelli sang arias.

Solana is a former physics professor and long time Spanish cabinet officer. He is an admitted former Marxist. So far, he appears to be little noticed or is intentionally ignored by the USA's mainstream media. He has had a steady growing stream of powers handed him starting, apparently, in November 1995. In 1995, the six month rotating presidencies of the Western European Union, a ten nation military federation, and the European Union coincided for the very first time. Both rotating presidencies belonged to Spain for that six month period. Both were handed to Javier Solana to handle on behalf of the Kingdom of Spain. He was a mere cabinet officer for Spain at that time. He had also been spokesman for the Spanish government, from 1985 to 1988 while serving as Spain's Minister of Culture.

As the six month rotating president of the European Union, coinciding with one as well for the 10 Nation Western European Union, he executed the first of many Mediterranean area "Treaties of Association, with Israel on November 20, 1995. One week week later, he launched the Barcelona process which was an admitted hoped for Roman empire reconfiguration. Fifteen nations from Europe and 12 from the Middle East would participate. Ehud Barak represented Israel. Yasser Arafat represented the Palestinian Union. Barak proudly told the delegates at those sessions how happy he was that Israel had at long last joined "The European Club." "We have beaten our swords into plowshares," reportedly said Barak.

Only two days after that event from which the USA was excluded, except as an observer, Javier Solana would be named the new head of NATO. Canada, whose Nova Scotia's maritime economy had been virtually decimated by actions earlier that same year by Javier Solana, curiously went along with Solana's unanimous dark horse candidate election.[10]

Solana has also been given sole powers to shut down Europe's Space Agency in case of emergency. He is also working diligently to consolidate all military powers of the European Union. This means a potential army to him of 2 million men and modestly estimated 160 billion Euro budget.

That Javier Solana appears to be calling shots, even with the USA, is shown by treatment recently given Tony Blair. Although George Bush badly wanted Tony Blair, virtually his only EU ally, to be the Quartet's envoy to the Middle East, Blair has now been bluntly told that he has no authority to enter into negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Evidently, Javier Solana wants the diplomatic glory of that accomplishment all for himself. This is still another of the growing examples of Javier Solana always appearing to get his own way. [11]

Javier Solana is an apparently ubiquitous enigma. He looks bluntly totally harmless. I would describe him as being appearance wise as "somebody you would buy a used car from and feel perfectly safe, everybody's favorite uncle, everybody's favorite professor, the most comfortable pair of old shoes in your closet." In short, he looks perfectly safe.

Is he? His publicly revealed petulance over Tony Blair's appointment reveals another side to this man -- a more pensive, darker side. His declared antagonism to USA religious feelings in 2003,[12] his disregard for the religious feelings of Serbian Orthodox believers who are seeing their religious capital, Kosovo, ripped from them, his disregard for the Gush Katif Jewish Gaza settlers who were forcibly dragged from their former homes, only to have Gaza turned into a new terror center for the rest of Israel.

With the help of Stanford University and New York University, and the USA's Brookings Institution, Javier Solana is in the vanguard of drawing up new global governance machinery. [13] Those efforts have been even applauded by the USA's State Department. In that same speech and other speeches, Javier Solana expressed dismay that "nobody wanted to obey" and his interpretation of what he calls "The You-Tube Effect." [14]

'We now know that we must bring together the world of soldiers, diplomats, judges and development experts. More fundamentally the old system cannot cope because power is shifting away. Within political systems: to the media, markets and above all to individuals. . . . These days, there is less obedience. Who wants to be a follower if you are constantly told you can be what you want to be? It is striking that in Britain, the slogan for the recruitment for the army has changed from "Your country needs You" to "Be all you can be".[15]

On July 14th, Javier Solana celebrated his 65th birthday. It appears that France and Great Britain gave him some pretty big presents in the form of the new European treaty. Solana has long coveted Security Council access. This time, it appears he just may have gotten it.[16]

I hope my present impressions about this man and his career are wrong. If they are not, may the Lord help us all!

[1] Article, “Getting it wrong,”

[3] Article by Bruno Waterfield in Brussels, “EU will take Britain’s EU seat, says Hague.” July 20, 2007,



[6] General Report 1998 - Chapter V: Role of the Union in the worldSection 1: Common foreign and security policy (3/24), Section 666, Europa.

[8] See e.g., Lindstrom & Gasparini Chailott Occasional paper No. 44, April 2003: “European Union Institute for Security Studies paper, “The Galileo Satellite System and its Emergency Implications, Chailot
[9] Blumenthal, Sidney. The Clinton Wars. Farrar, Straux and Giroux, New York: 2003. Citing page 666-667. The actual paragraph may be read online under a “search inside” feature on’s website,

[10] Article by “Yours Truly,” “Curious Triangle”

See Javier Solana’s official Curriculum Vitae at






Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Prophecy without Words?



This was on the front page Yahoo! news today. Here's a snapshot in time, in case it vanishes on line as sometimes happens! Looks like Blair is reporting to Solana to at least this observer!

Further, check this (click on here):

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Javier Solana is talking very BIG today!



I sat quietly at lunch today. At a nearby table, I could not help but overhear three middle aged to elderly ministers . They were gravely discussing what was of pressing spiritual importance to them today: (1) Bible colleges in Grand Rapids, Michigan and in Canada; (2) Stock market investments; (3) what they considered to be the total resilience of the USA's economy.

I did an online search over lunch and found the information you see in picture form above (click on it to make it page size). I was so very tempted to go to the ministers' table with my laptop and ask them for their reaction to today's news. I showed the story together with the Europa code section 666 creating Solana's job to the waitress. With a gasp, she grasped it immediately.

The three ministers all seemed like gentle spirits. However, they clearly appeared clueless as to prophetically significant world events. Hopefully, when the prophesied times eventually come to pass -- which they will -- these gentlemen too will wake up.

Looking at these headlines, it is time we all awake and smell the coffee! I plan to write a detailed article tonight for Watch for it there.

Monday, July 16, 2007

More of Pushing the Cashless Implant Society

I was researching "transhumanism" when I chanced across this little contribution on my web surfing. All apologies to the man whose hearing was restored by a cochlear implant, but notice carefully the reference to brain implants! If the print is too small for you to read, click on the picture to enlarge it to full page view. You may read the whole ugly report by clicking here.[1]



Friday, July 13, 2007

Saturday July 14, 2007 Program

My brilliant colleague and peer in New Age research work, Mrs. Dorothy Margraf, will reverse roles with me on MY PERSPECTIVE tomorrow, July 14, 2007, 2 p.m. Eastern time, 11 a.m. Pacific Time, 12 noon, Mountain Time, and 1 p.m. Eastern Time. Dorothy is going to interview me about my work over the past 25 years, my law practice, the New Age Movement, my research on Javier Solana, etc., etc. Please join us either live by telephone (numbers will be given on the air) or in the chatroom at Stay tuned!

Monday, July 09, 2007


"In The Magic of Findhorn, the story of the community by Paul Hawken, the author relates how Robert Ogilvie Crombie (Roc), an associate of the Findhorn Community met a spirit being whom he recognised as 'Pan'. This being, during the course of the ensuing conversation, asked him, 'Do you love my subjects?' "Yes'. In that case do you love me?' 'Why not?' 'DO YOU LOVE ME? "Yes' ...'You know of course that I am the Devil? You have just said that you love the devil.' 'No you are not the devil. You are the god of the woodlands and countryside. There is no evil in you' There are many other references in the book to contact with spirit beings. . . .

"David Spangler, one of the leaders of the New Age movement states in Reflections on the Christ (p. 40-44), published by the Findhorn Foundation, 'Christ is the same force as Lucifer, .(who) is an agent of God's love acting through evolution - . . Lucifer prepares man . . for the experience of Christhood . . . The light that reveals to us the path to Christ comes from Lucifer . . . the great initiator . . . Lucifer works within each of us to bring us to wholeness as we move into the new age . . . each of us is brought to that point which I term the Luciferic initiation , . Lucifer comes to give us the final Luciferic initiation . . that many people in the days ahead will be facing, for it is an initiation into the New Age" *

In Biblical times, there was never any shortage of false prophets to reassure Israel and its kings that "good times" were coming as God's judgment and disaster instead loomed. Today's times so painfully parallel those ones.

I started sounding alarms about the New Age Movement in 1981. In 1982, my work was publicized by a converted Detroit Free Press reporter. Worldwide full page newspaper advertisements appeared on April 25, 1982. They proclaimed "THE CHRIST IS NOW HERE." The ads had been no surprise to me. The Detroit Free Press had authorized its reporter to begin working on the story that appeared on May 5, 1982 after learning in April 1982 that "Tara Center" would be spending upwards of half a million dollars to run such ads globally.

Obviously, the spending of half a million dollars -- worth much more in that economy than now -- had a very serious purpose. Somebody was not doing it on a whim or a prank.

The delusion to the New Age proponents of the scheme was that they were safe from premature detection. They honestly believed what Alice Bailey and other doctrinal adherents of the New Age Movement in its multitude of forms expressed: that nobody could understand their teachings but "an initiate."

Planetary Citizens founder Donald Keys happily wrote in his 1982 EARTH AT OMEGA: PASSAGE TO PLANETIZATION that so far the New Age Movement had eluded detection "by alarmed forces and defenders of the status quo ante."

Keys was in for a surprise as was his much wealthier and influential sponsoring mentor, Norman Cousins. They had been detected and alarms were sounded. The alarms were somewhat muted, however, by "Christian experts" who rushed in to say nothing was happening. There was no "New Age Movement," and if there was, which was doubtful, "they certainly were not networked politically."

It has occurred to me more than once that the New Age Movement may have created its own "opposition." Spiritual Counterfeits Project is listed in many New Age directories from the early 1970's under its original name of "World Christian Liberation Front." The Spiritual Community Guide listed it as "a Community where people live together to get on with the aims listed under Center." In the key to New Age Centers, they cited that the purpose of the "New Age Centers" was to advance the spreading "New Age."

It was obvious to those who would look that the Movement had been steadily moving since the 1960s. The Unity and Diversity Council in 1965 launched its first council with none other than former United Nations leader U Thant as a keynote speaker. The event was held at San Francisco's Cow Palace. Ten thousand were in attendance. The same people were running the event as are running various Peace Sundays with no small success now. Leland Steward coordinated the Unity and Diversity Council. Those mass events continued to grow and in 1979 it was Leland Steward's umbrella coordinating organization that successfully brought Benjamin Crème to the United States .

They were truly moving "great guns," until May 1982. That's when people started looking critically at them. Spiritual Counterfeits Project (SCP), Christian Research Institute (CRI), and so many others, included but not limited to Fr. Pacwa (now running EWTN) gave critical aspects of the New Age Movement cover while they could regroup.

They have now regrouped and once again believe themselves to be in striking position. Author Paul Hawken, who wrote a book I heavily utilized in writing my book, THE HIDDEN DANGERS OF THE RAINBOW, "THE MAGIC OF FINDHORN," now focuses on the all important environmental wing of the Movement they used to call "The New Age Movement." His book, Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came in to Being and Why No One Saw it Coming (Viking).

Well, I saw it coming -- most clearly. Many others did too. They were shamed into silence by a seemingly strange alliance of Evangelicals and New Agers. Jeremy Rifkin was given public access to Christian media to propagate the alliance. David Spangler bragged openly post 1987 "Harmonic Convergence," and beyond, the "Gold Lake" evangelical prostitution conferences held in 1987 that ongoing meetings had been taking place of which the one he had just left in Boulder (coordinated by Doug Coe and chaired by Barbara Marx Hubbard).

Now using Biblical language, "the transgressors have come to the fore."

[Q] "You write about how this evolving movement will look very different from movements of the past.
[A]There’s no charismatic leader, no center. It’s not ideological. That’s often lost in the reporting of it, because what’s reported is the resistance point of a group saying, “Stop. Don’t.” That becomes an interesting event from a media point of view. What goes unreported is the innovation, design, engineering, and social technologies. This is a movement of ideas. And sometimes ideas don’t work and you try another one and that works, and then you try and figure out how to make it work better. It’s an iterative, evolutionary process. It’s tens of thousands of ideas with respect to water, buildings, cities, poverty, women, education, climate and carbon neutrality. You can’t sum them up because they appear all over the place. But they actually do all point north toward a very different world than the one we live in now.

[Q] You suggest that the politics of the future are really about fostering unusual alliances that revolve around ideas. Strange bedfellows—evangelicals aligning with environmentalists, for example. Are you seeing this elsewhere?
[A] Yes. At the same time, we find out that we’re not strange bedfellows. We’re human beings and what estranged us is far less important and almost meaningless compared to what is meaningful now. You’re seeing Wal-Mart, for example, quite authentically—and I don’t care what someone else says about them—they’re very committed to 100% renewable energy and a lot of other things that they have not talked about yet. Well, who would’ve thought it? Is that a strange bedfellow or just the American people awakening to core values that now need to be expressed?

It’s the same thing now as it was then. It's still about ushering in a new "Christ" -- one who is neither Jesus nor Jewish. Its still about shutting down traditional religious orthodoxies. It's still about their three main goals as I expressed in the in the 1980s: (1) a New World Order; (2) a New World Religion; and (3) preparing the world to accept their New Age Christ.

Yes, and their New World religion is still about Lucifer. Its still about "Maitreya." It's still an anti-God Movement, yes, and contrary to what Walter Martin, Fr. Pacwa, Denver Seminary, Gordon Lewis, and the ubiquitous J. Gordon Melton may have told you, it is about taking over. Paul Hawken lies when he says there is no male vertebrate in charge -- then again, he may be right -- the Luciferic origins he himself acknowledged in his THE MAGIC OF FINDHORN, may not be a male vertebrate -- at least a human one.

Hawken lies when he says this is new. He was clearly part of what I had analyzed in 1981 and he very well knows it. He is now emboldened, especially with his "evangelical" support" for significant parts of his movement.

Hawken says this movement is the Earth's immune system response to religion and the like. Sounds just like earlier pronouncements of Peter Russell and Barbara Marx Hubbard that Judeo Christian religions are cancerous cells on the global brain which require removal.

Hopefully, these ugly forces won't be able to claim your soul. Are you ready?

* Interesting to me also is this quote which is not attributed. Without looking at my 1983 THE HIDDEN DANGERS OF THE RAINBOW, I am quite certain that this is nearly word for word as published there from my 1981 and beyond research . I am, however, happy that the information is disseminated!

[1] Link to Paul Hawken You Tube Video is

[2] "Blessed Unrest" In his new book, Paul Hawken looks at the history of the environmental movement and predicts its future. By Elizabeth A. Evitts Posted April 18, 2007
P.S. MORE CAN BE READ AT and a video downloaded! CEC

Sunday, July 08, 2007

How far have American Civil Rights Degenerated

I wonder if the scenes before Noah boarding the ark or Sodom & Gomorrah being destroyed could have been much worse than this one. I would appreciate comments!


*Faith Under Fire* * 7 Christians arrested, Cops call holding Bibles while lying prostrate 'disturbing peace'*
Posted: July 7, 2007
Christians have been arrested recently at "gay" festivals for nothing more than having a protest sign that is "wider than their torso," but now police have gone even further, targeting Bible-carrying ministers for praying on public property and for standing on a public sidewalk near a "gay" festival.
One of the new cases comes from Elmira, N.Y., where police arrested seven Christians who went into a public park where a "gay" fest was beginning and started to pray, faces down, while holding their Bibles.
They were cited for "disturbing the peace," and Assistant Police Chief Mike Robertson said that the seven are accused of a "combination" of allegations under that statute, which includes the "intent" to cause a public inconvenience, any "disturbance" of a meeting of persons, obstructing vehicular or pedestrian traffic, or taking part in "any act that serves no legitimate purpose."
Pastor Mark Holick was arrested for being on sidewalk at Wichita "gay" fest
The second such case arose in Wichita, Kan., where police arrested Spirit One Christian Center Pastor Mark Holick, who had received permission earlier from officers to be on the public sidewalk adjacent to the park where the festival was occurring but then was arrested doing exactly that.
Julian Raven, a street preacher, said that his group of seven assembled to pray for three hours the night before Elmira's recent "pride" festival in promotion of the homosexual lifestyle.
"We have a legal right to be at an event held in a public square. We're not a hate group," he said. "We're Christians and we're going to be there to pray."
He said he contacted police, who told him he had no free speech rights in the public park.
"The female officer, she said, 'You're not going to cross the street. You're not going to enter the park and you're not going to share your religion with anybody in this park,'" he said.
"When she said that, for the first time in my life as a Christian, I felt now my freedom of speech is threatened or challenged," he said. "I was being told I could not share my religion with anybody in that park."
Raven said he told the officer "she was violating the Constitution that she had sworn to uphold, and she was very agitated and adamant, and couldn't look me straight in the eye."
Raven asked for the justification for such a threat and was not given a response.
He said his team of Christians then went into the park, holding Bibles over their heads to signify their subservience to God's Word, and lay on their faces to pray.
Within three minutes, police officers had put handcuffs on the seven, to the cheers of the homosexual crowd, he said.
He said a court date is pending for the seven July 23.
"I have the highest respect for the police officers. They have a very difficult job to do. But we were treated unfairly in a public setting. This was a hasty show of force. It was not called for," he said.
He said if the situation is left unchallenged, the city of Elmira will be in the position of being able to control the content of people's messages in a lawful assembly – or even thoughts if they are nearby.
"We didn't say boo to a goose, still we were arrested," he said.
The local newspaper reported the arrests came just "moments" after Elmira Mayor John Tonello delivered a speech "celebrating diversity."
And the actions prompted some immediate criticism from newspaper readers.
"I was appalled and disgusted by the gay stories strewn through the … paper. … What was even more disturbing was the way the city acted. Since when is it illegal to sit on the ground in a public park and recite Bible verses? Are they not protected by the same Constitution that allows gay people to have their gay pride event. These Bible thumpers had their constitutional right to free speech and assembly trampled on by the city. They should not have been arrested," said Kevin Raznoff.
Robertson said that the Christians "certainly" have a right to assemble, but not on public property when there's an "organized" event there. Asked repeatedly about how the "disturbance" statute relates to First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech, he did not answer.
"Obviously, they caused a disruption to an event that was taking place," he said.
But Raven confirmed that the seven Christians did not approach a single person, did not speak to anyone and did not even make any audible statements until after they were arrested.
Pastor Holick's case in Wichita was even more drastic. He had gone, with a team from his church, to pass out flyers and pray at a recent "pride" festival held there.
He had checked with the police department and was told, "The sidewalk is your friend."
"Upon arriving we began to set up," he said. "Immediately, I was approached by WPD and told that we could not go into the park (a public park mind you where everyone else – except the Christians – was allowed in) and that we could not be on the sidewalk on that side of the street but that we could go to the other side of the street.
"In other words, one side of the street is open to Christians but the public park and the public sidewalk next to the park is not," he said.
But then Holick was arrested within about four minutes of his arrival.
"It is obvious that the WPD did not keep their word and that they wanted to arrest as quickly as possible. The First Amendment … was cast aside like so much garbage," he said.
"The sin is 'coming out' further and further and the church is now being pushed further and further back inside the four walls of the church building; we are the ones that are seen as 'the trouble makers.' The police arrest the Christians and allow all manner of perversion to flaunt itself in the streets of Wichita. And we the church … well … I'm not sure we care," he said.
Police alleged that they asked Holick five times to "leave" the festival, even though he never purchased the required admission fee or went in.
Holick already had been targeted by the Internal Revenue Service for the moral statements he posted on the church's sign.
The notice he got from the IRS warned him about putting his Christian beliefs on the sign, and he responded that he would continue to preach the Word of God.
Just a week earlier, it was reported that police in St. Petersburg, Fla., arrested five Christians for carrying signs "wider than their torsos" outside an officially designated protest area at that city's homosexual festival.
Pastor Billy Ball, Assistant Pastor Doug Pitts, Frankie Primavera and Josh Pettigrew, all of Faith Baptist Church in Primrose, Ga., were arrested after leaving a small area set aside by city officials for protest activities. Bill Holt, of Lighthouse Baptist Church in Jefferson, Ga., was also taken into custody.
According to Lighthouse Pastor Kevin Whitman, the five men were told by police their signs were not allowed outside the protest area because they were wider than their torsos. When the men refused to put them away, they were arrested for violating a controversial city ordinance that governs permitted events.
St. Petersburg officials, following disturbances at a previous homosexual pride festival, implemented rules governing outdoor events that set aside "free speech zones," where protesters are allowed.
The resulting ordinance came under fire by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Alliance Defense Fund for being too broad. It allows the city to create prior restraints of speech on an event-by-event basis, with virtually no predictable limits. It also criminalizes certain free speech behavior around public events and authorizes the police to enforce breaches of permits – the penalty for such breaches being arrest.

Tuesday, July 03, 2007

Curious Triangle: Solana, Giddens, Creme? Cumbey Maitreya's foe? Go Team!

· Saturday, July 7, 2007

o 2 P.M. TO 3 P.M.: BARRY CHAMISH, “Bye-Bye Gaza”
o 3 P.M. to 4 P.M. NOAH HUTCHINGS, Southwest Radio Church “Purpose Driven Churched Problems”
o SCHEDULES: Central Time: 1-2 p.m. Chamish; 2-3 p.m. Noah Hutchings
o Mountain Time: 12-1 p.m. Chamish; 1-2 p.m. Noah Hutchings
o Pacific Time: 11 a.m. to Noon: Barry Chamish; Noon to 1 p.m., Noah Hutchings

The upper picture is of a Benjamin Creme article about Yours Truly, which reader Dawn called to my attention this afternoon. You may read the original, if it is still there, by clicking here and/or on the footnote link below. [1]

Is this another curious triangle? Anthony Giddens, Javier Solana, and Benjamin Creme? Is a message being sent here to the Share International faithful? I invite comments and knowledgeable responses. This is a Spanish language site about their new, so-called "Maitreya" "the Christ," "the Great World Teacher" (el instructor del mundo). What is this professor doing on that page? Stay tuned! CLICK ON THE PICTURE TO SEE IT IN READABLE SIZE and provided they have not by now removed it, you may read the original for yourself by clicking here. [2]

Monday, July 02, 2007

Javier Solana says Iran may be responsible for Gaza attacks




Extra: Read by clicking here about EU 3.5 billion Euro Propaganda Campaign

The news from Javier Solana today, nearly 13 months after he went to Teheran on June 6, 2006 to represent the world's interests before the Iranian government, is that he might be hardening his stance on Iran. According to a Reuters press release of this date, Solana says now that Iran might be behind some of the latest and most serious terrorism in the Middle East -- in Gaza and elsewhere.

Quoting from the Reuters' release:

BRUSSELS, July 2 (Reuters) - The European Union foreign policy chief suggested on Monday that Iran could be linked to the Hamas military takeover of Gaza, recent attacks on the Lebanese army, and on European peacekeepers in Lebanon.
Javier Solana, who has led efforts to bring Iran back to the negotiating table over its nuclear programme, stopped short of blaming Tehran outright, but said the incidents could not be treated separately. . . .
"What happened in Gaza cannot be seen separately from what happened in Lebanon," he told a conference on the Middle East hosted by the Socialist group of the European Parliament.
"There are new groups in the Palestinian camps," Solana said. "And the fact that UNIFIL has been attacked for the first time cannot be taken separately."

Stay tuned!

Sunday, July 01, 2007

Constance Cumbey related to Javier Solana?

Barry Chamish will be my first hour guest on My Perspective, next Saturday, July 7, 2007.
The added picture is from today's search engine. The one below is the original one today from The search term used was "Javier Solana."

To my readers -- friends and enemies alike:
Unless I had hit a sensitive nail on the head, why would they be noticing me, much less bothering with me? Check this. I have printed it out and made it available this way because of the charming way they play their little game of "now you see us, now you don't." This has been going on -- off and on -- with use of my name on various search engines as a category since the summer of 2003. Click the picture above for a full page view! Use your computer scroll key to see the entire screen, including, most importantly, "relate names." You won't be able to go to the links because this is a picture of the search engine In the past, this appeared on;;;; and others. Here's betting the configuration changes as soon as people start checking. That is why I have preserved this evidence photographically. Every friend I have insists I must not travel to Europe! COMMENTS ARE INVITED!