Friday, March 05, 2010

TRACEABILITY IN A SUSTAINABLE WORLD by J.D. with assistance of Susanna and Dorothy

To my readers:
Here is Part III of JD's important research series.
Stay tuned!
Traceability in a Sustainable World
by J.D. with research assistance from Susanna and Dorothy

A look into the very real RFID agenda ensnaring the earth

Part 3a: A chip on the shoulder of past U.S. politics

In the previous pieces I have discussed international organizations calling for and implementing RFID infrastructures through out the world. We have met some influential players and have gotten a glimpse of the scope of potential users of this technology. In this piece I thought I would bring the subject a little closer to home for Americans and discuss varying roles of U.S. politicians and offices in this agenda. It can not be claimed that the role of this agenda in the affairs of the United States was started by the current administration. As it has been helped and, in some cases, trumpeted by the administration of George W. Bush. One example can be shown in the actions of Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services in the George W. Bush administration. During his time as Secretary, Thompson introduced programs that strengthened the influence of government agencies such as the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) and subsidiaries such asOffice of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONCHIT).

With both of these groups falling under the DHHS umbrella, it must be understood that the sole purpose of both groups is creation of a world wide system of information integration within the health care industry. This can be witnessed within goals and proposals from NCVHS. One such proposal reads as follows: "It should be formally designated as the official body for obtaining public advice, assistance and approval for the development and promulgation of terms, basic data sets, classifications, and guidelines for national and international use. All Western countries have such a body, and it is this group through which we 'legitimize' common approaches to health statistics at home and cooperate with the World Health Organization and other countries so that international comparisons of health needs, services, demands, and outcomes can be made." It should be noted that this recommendation has been followed, as NCVHS now collects and shares these pieces of data with the WHO in a move toward information standardization globally. With that in mind lets take a look at another recommendation from the same source which has yet to be implemented: "The Committee (NCVHS) has spoken out for many years on the need for a unique health identifier, while also stressing security and confidentiality protections as a precondition."

To properly understand what NCVHS means by 'unique health identifier', we must look to ONCHIT and their recommendations concerning such. Among the Health Information Technology(HIT) goals set by the office we see: "A nation-wide utility that allows secure and seamless health information exchange, capitalized by public and private investment and operated by private organizations". This nation-wide utility is specifically mentioned as a RFID infrastructure by the Health Information Technology (HIT) Policy Committee. While the 'unique health identifier' desired is mentioned as an individually assigned RFID chip for identification. These goals would set the pace for what the 2009 Healthcare Reform Bill would identify as the information infrastructure that the bill was looking to create. This legislation references these goals and suggestions of ONCHIT and NCVHS by name a multitude of times in conjunction with new streams of data and committees that the bill was looking to create. It should also come as little surprise to readers that these goals directly reflect the healthcare standards supported by GS1, a United Nations not for profit organization covered in Part 1 of this series.

After working to synchronize these offices with DHHS, Thompson would leave office to become a board member for Verichip Corporation. His time with the company can be categorized by the developments that were made by the company in the healthcare sector, specifically leading to what is now known as the Verimedsystem. It has also been speculated that Thompson helped influence the FDA's approval of the technology. After Thompson's departure from Verichip, he would go on to become a partner atAkin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer, & Feld, the nations leading lobbying and government contract firm. Through Akin Gump, Thompson has continued to work on behalf of Verichip, in the form oflobbying and negotiating contracts with various government entities. One could nearly write a book on all the ways Thompson alone has helped advance the RFID agenda. As such, I will be coming back to him periodically as the information fits into my articles.

In Part 1, I discussed how GS1 was working toward creation of a RFID infrastructure that would integrate healthcare, retail, shipping, and all other forms of business into a single global system. Following in the footsteps of GS1, another example of RFID promotion by the previous administration comes in the form of the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC). This initiative of the United States and European Union was launched in 2007 when President Bush, Angela Merkel, and Jose Manuel Barrosso signed Framework for Advancing Transatlantic Economic Integration Between the United States of America and the European Union. This framework is exactly what it's name suggests, as here we see TEC has laid the ground work for complete economic integration between the EU and the US. One of the key elements of this integration is the implementation of a interoperable RFID infrastructure. The Transatlantic Traceability Infrastructure Project (TTIP) of GS1, which you can read about in part 1, is also a key project of TEC. Since 2007 TEC has advanced many other sub projects working to create one market, with one way of doing business. The end goal which can be seen in the framework, is a completely integrated global economy with a RFID infrastructure at its core. I will cover more of these projects in the near future, as they pertain to other subjects which I will be covering, including the debate over smart cards versus direct implantation of RFID technology.

Now that we see how the previous administration has helped lay this foundation, we can move forward in the next piece and explore connections within the current administration to this agenda. We will see personal connections to not only RFID developers, but to the cashless society discussed in Part 2 and it's financial arm of microcredit. Some of these connections will be personal, some will be business associations which led to the election of our current president. It is my hope that by the end of the next article, readers will have a better understanding of the agenda unfolding in front of them and why there is such a heavy push to pass legislation concerning healthcare, jobs, and green technologies. As the next piece will show this administrations purpose is to serve the desires of those behind this agenda, and not that of the American people.


Once again thank you for posting this, and for your continued support of this all too important project.
Zero Point Energy Wand ( Repackage witches wands as science )

The video says: The wand is just reminding the body to go back to source. Altering consciousness on the planet by helping people remember their source. A Consciousness movement disguised as a wand.

Harry Potter promoted wands and now we are seeing the fruits of that huge marketing campaign.

There is now a MLM company selling people the "New Science Wands" to heal.

They are doing a soft launch spring 2010 (so right now) It has only been marketed for a couple months.

I fear this will take off. People are giving testimonies of how well it works. There is power behind these wands, but not a neutral force nor God. Some psychics are saying this is just the beginning of these kinds of energy healing technologies that will change the world.

People think this is "New Science" but it is just old witchcraft.

Wands are used in witchcraft as we know. They are explained to work in a similar manner.

Quote from witchcraft sites:

"The wand is a tool that is long associated with magic and Witchcraft. It is primarily used in rituals and spells to channel and direct energy."

"The wand is the instrument of invocation of spirits. In most traditions, the wand represents the element of fire (in other traditions, earth, air, water or spirit) and symbolizes the life-force within the Witch. The wand dates back to prehistoric times. The Greek god Hermes is represented with a caduceus, a wand entwined with snake and winged top, a symbol of power, wisdom and healing."

That is pretty much how this "new" wand is being promoted. As a means to connect with source and channel and direct the energy of source.

It is also promoted as a means to deal with our Health insurance issues and financial problems.

We are seeing such deception under the guise of "New Science" like Quantum Physics.

New Science and New Spirituality are becoming the New World's view.

We truly are in the Last days.


We are told craft shall prosper greatly in the last days. This could not happen if it was still considered a fringe sect. This is another great example of how witchcraft and occultic beliefs are being brought into the mainstream. Thanks for posting this.
Contstance wrote at the end of an earlier post:

"The New Age might be trying to build an alliance with 'moderate' Moslems . . ." YES, they are. And with MODERATE 'Christians' and MODERATE Jews . . . .


The "alliances" are the TERMITES FROM WITHIN weakening the infrastructures for the WRECKING BALLS FROM WITHOUT.

Well put. I've been trying to keep up with the "termites" while many on here do a good job on the "wrecking balls."

If a definition of a hypocrite is someone who does not walk the talk, then our moderates are perfect examples of hypocrites. They disagree with Christianity, but still refuse to leave and form alliances with those who seek to destroy us and try to change us from within. There are some things that cannot be changed. You can't support abortion (murder) and say let's agree to disagree.

Moderates also argue that since people commit these acts anyway, why not legalize them. It's like saying people kill so let's legalize murder. Oh... wait Euthanasia is legal.

In my own church itself, they are lay people and clergy that disagree with so much, but still won't leave. They think they have a birthright to stay. Last time I recall Jesus said "No everyone who calls me Lord will enter the kingdom of heaven. Only those who do the will of my Father is heaven." Matthew 7:21.

The thing is when you quote this scripture verse, they then turn around and tell you Jesus was talking about you, instead. Since, they obviously know better than God himself.

I am sorry If I am going off, my I am just mad at the complete lack of common sense everywhere.

Thanks JD, Great research by the way :)

Here is something else someone pointed out to me that is going on.

World Bank-funded an online game called "Evoke" that says it is a "10-week crash course in changing the world"

It launched on March 3rd 2010. It appears to be much more than an ordinary new age/new world order game. It is far more personal and true indoctrination.

""We're looking to get people aware of and engaged in solving real problems that people in developing countries face," Bob Hawkins, senior education specialist at the World Bank Institute, wrote in an e-mail. "If games like EVOKE can raise awareness of real-world problems facing the poor in developing countries and encourage innovative, sustainable solutions to these problems, we’d like to see more people playing such games."

They say when you do not know the answer to a problem "Evoke it" We all know how the term of "Evoke" is used in dealing with evil spirits.

This is not just a game. They say that you can go to their real convention in DC to get seed money for your personal project "to save the world".

Another link about it.

I think this one needs some extra investigation to what exactly they are teaching.

JD, Susanna, and Dorothy,

Thank you for pulling together this valuble research to share with all here.

Mary Jean
There is only one who is worthy to stand before God.

Revelation 5:2-6;8
2 And I saw a strong angel proclaiming with a loud voice, "Who is worthy to open the book and to break its seals?"

3 And no one in heaven or on the earth or under the earth was able to open the book or to look into it.

4 Then I began to weep greatly because no one was found worthy to open the book or to look into it;

5 and one of the elders said to me, "Stop weeping; behold, the Lion that is from the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, has overcome so as to open the book and its seven seals."

6 And I saw [a]between the throne (with the four living creatures) and the elders a Lamb standing, as if slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God, sent out into all the earth.

8 When He had taken the book, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb, each one holding a harp and golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints.

There is only one who is worthy. Not the Apostles, prophets, or saints! Everyone else has fallen short.
Mark 3:28-29

28 "Truly I say to you, all sins shall be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they utter;

29 but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin"--
Since I've not been here for very long, I may have missed any research or postings about the following, but I found some interesting New Age sites that have an interesting twist.

Most places like this blog that watch and warn about the heresies that are spreading everywhere seem to equate "New Age" with "New World Order". That is, discussions about the Illuminati, the CFR, the Masons, the International Bankers, and other elitist, rich, and powerful cabals (which I do not find as disturbing or as much of threat to our security and well-being as, say, Russian/Chinese plans to obliterate us or invade us), seem to equate those groups AND their plans with those who are truly New Age in their philosophy and religious views.

I found a couple of related sites that would seem to show there is a distinct difference between the two groups, and in fact, that the two groups are at odds with each other. The true New Ager, according to the sites below, is working against the plans of the NWO. They see the people in the NWO group as being selfish, and wanting to rule the world in a "Master/slave" paradigm. Instead, these New Agers think that the NWO crowd is about to be toppled and eliminated as part of the ushering in of the New Age.

(...cont from above...)

The sites in question are run by Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy and are called either Project Camelot or Project Avalon. They also are associated with David Wilcock's Divine Cosmos website. All three links are here:

There's a lot of stuff to be mined from these sites... I've not had the time to dig in, so if someone else here does, feel free to post your findings.

What got me started in this branch of investigating was the following YouTube video (this is part one, and there's six 10-minute parts) by Bill Ryan, explaining their project, and how the governments of the world are waiting for the right moment to reveal to the world that we have contacted ETs. I know, sounds bizarre, but it all fits into several stories in the news lately about new manuscripts being found and the increase in UFO sightings and the Norway spiral.... all of this is prepping the world to receive "dramatic revelations" that we are not alone and that the ones who have contacted us want to help us into the New Age. These revelations are also designed to contradict and refute the authenticity of Christianity and its founding documents and beliefs.

Make note: I think this guy is wacky but he's not like most in his field...he presents the info as "here's what I think is relevant evidence, and you decide what to do with it".

Part 1:
Part 2:
Part 3:
Part 4:
Part 5:
Part 6:

The stage is ready, folks. As JD and Susanna and others are now showing on the technology side how things are ready, so this shows (as well as many others I'm sure) how things are ready on the "metaphysical" side of things.

Oh the times, they are a changin'......

I would be a little carefull with the Wilcock end. He is preaching a imminent UFO disclosure. His problem is he actually assumes that what is being conversed with are aliens. The ufo contact new agers are not much different from the ascended master new agers. The only major difference is where they claim to get their knowledge from. Creme flirts with both sides, and a case could be made that Blavatsky and Bailey did as well. Even the ascended master groups claim to be against the established order, so this is another similarity.

It has only been through the close study of these groups that we realize their networks are all connected. It is a universal doctrine, so it would only make sense that they would incorporate some ideals which would appeal to those less inclined to religous beliefs. There are also some aspects of Project Camelot that I have read about which are eerily similar to the Venus Project mode of thinking.

As far as your concerns about Russia or China, I agree there is a lot of posturing that could make one nervous about a invasion or attack. However if it were to happen, at this point I have to believe it would be part of a larger operation, i.e. to bring about the final end to the sovereign United States to usher us into the global era. Both of these nations have agreed to some form of implementation of the system I am writing about. A nation would not agree to such a integrated system with another nation that was seen wholey as an enemy.

As a clarification. My comments on Wilcock and Camelot are meant as my over all view and understanding of what they are bringing to the table. Not that you in anyway endose them.
JD, thanks for your input.

Regarding Russia/China/et al attacking the US:

I've seen it proposed in many places (and I think you are proposing somewhat the same thing - if not forgive me for misinterpreting your view) that such an attack would be orchestrated by The Powers That Be (ie, the NWO/Illuminati/Bilderbergers/World Bankers) and that somehow the wars we fight (ie, East vs. West) are all run from above and no matter who wins the war, the ones running everything - the shadow world government, TPTB, call them what you will - gain monetarily and keep their "secret" power structure intact, waiting for the right moment to implement their New World Order.

This is the "conspiratorial" view of history, and I reject many elements of it, if not most.

I think the war between East and West is a real one, and we have been lulled to sleep thinking we won the Cold War, when in fact, we did not. I do not think an attack from the East is a matter of if, but of when.

That both Russia and China support much of the agenda regarding universal ID and related things MUST be (in my opinion) interpreted in light of their true intention on finally defeating the West (especially the US) in some kind of future attack/invasion. Maybe they want an easy way to track us in the labor camps they set up post-invasion (like the numbering system Hitler used for the people in his camps...)

The Eastern Communist Bloc's plans for world domination, in other words, are not just another facet of the New Age plans for a New World, although there are similarities in what one sees in each plan.

I just can't see any way to reconcile the two plans. They aren't two prongs of the same plan, or two steps of the same plan, being run by the same people. Russia and China want to see the US destroyed, so they can continue their plans for worldwide socialism. They are warriors, with thousands of years of war and conquest in their history. They simply think that the US model for freedom and capitalism and morality combined under one roof so to speak isn't the best way for the world to live - it isn't their brand of "Utopia". But they view war as one of the best means to bring about their brand.

The New Agers, however, are not warriors - they want world peace, and the thought of fighting wars as we have in the past they find abhorrent. Don't most New Agers say vehemently that the past way of waging war must end? That is one of the central themes of all those wacky channelers (channeling demonic entities of course). They are as anti-Russia as they are anti-US, regarding a nation's sovereign right to wage war, aren't they?

Although...the world's entrance into the New Age WILL involve "making war against the saints". It's a different kind of war though - spiritual more than anything. Although forcing us underground and making us "outcasts" on the planet earth will involve physical conflict as well. But as the Bible warns, whoever lives by the sword will die by the sword.
The above are my current thoughts, but I'm still very open to changing the way I think about the Russia/China threat if the evidence shows that I need to look at things from a different perspective.

Here's how I see things happening, and hopefully this helps explain my current viewpoint:

1. Russia & Co. attack the US, and other Western countries, perhaps mainly those in the Western hemisphere first, when they think the time is right (ie, when we are weakened economically enough, or when we are dealing with an internal "revolution" of some sort or some other kind of internal chaos that started because perhaps Obama passed a health care bill nobody wants, or something else happens that causes someone on the Right - an agent provocateur? - to do something really rash and/or stupid, and it's the people vs. the govt. in a shooting match. And believe me when I say that Russia has FSB (KGB renamed) and Spetsnaz assets among the far right groups out there provoking things along).

2. They are successful to a point, that point being that the US is no longer a superpower capable of coming to the aid of any other nation that comes under attack.

3. When we are reduced to a non-threat in their eyes, they will attempt to invade Europe (if they haven't already done so or started to do so), and eventually set their target on the Middle East and Israel.

4. When the attack on Israel comes, in cooperation I'm guessing with Arab states, God will intervene and destroy the invading army. He may also help the remnant in the US who is fighting off the invasion, coming to their rescue in supernatural ways.

5. When both the US and Russia & Co. have become weakened by war, the revealing of the AC will take place at some point during this war. Perhaps he will take credit for the "miraculous" defeat of Russia & Co. in the Middle East, claiming that we are about to enter a new age without war, assisted by ETs, and that we need to lay aside our wars and listen to these new "masters" who are here to help guide us into our next "leap" of evolution.

6. The AC will claim authority over all nations, and the establishment of a world system of exchange and commerce will begin. The world will welcome this, because the world's economy and general state of welfare will be terrible by that time, because of the war between East and West. There will be famine, disease, and much wealth will have been destroyed. The diseases will be because of nuclear and biological weapons being used during this war.

Anyway, those are some of things that might happen, and roughly in that order, as I see things playing out. I could be way off base.... I adjust this model as I learn more and more. And I'm in a newly-increased learning mode now with all the stuff JD and Susanna and others have dug up, so that model will most likely change. :^)
The sequence above I tried to make fit with both the sequence of the seals opened in the book of Revelation, and also the large number of dreams and visions that show us being attacked by missiles from an outside enemy.

An interesting note (a friend of mine came up with this observation) to make regarding the seals:

The rider of the first horse is given a bow. At the time of the writing of the book of Revelation, the weapon with the greatest range was the bow and arrow. Currently, the weapon with the greatest range is the ICBM, whose trajectory is the same as that of an arrow shot from a bow!

An interesting interpretation of the first rider, yes? It may or may not have anything to do with what actually happens though - it's just an interesting theory, suggesting that the sequence of events described in the opening of the seals begins with a war involving missiles.

The idea of war starting things off makes a lot of sense in a lot of ways. Other things may precede war, like economic collapse brought about by a number of things.
Lucifer wants his spirituality to reign on Earth. That has always been his objective. He wants it to become the spirituality of the world.

I think that he had to create a false enemy and crises to make it happen. The two enemies of the New Age Movement seem to be Monotheistic Religions and the Materialistic Power Elite that control governments.

What I see happening is they are using the idea and very well the existence of the NWO and Monotheistic Religions to take the heat for all that is wrong in the world and then the new age can come in and save the day.

They actually assert that organized religions are corrupted and controlled by the one world elite. In actuality all evil aspects of organized religion where created by occult infiltration in the first place.

They create a common enemy , then create the savior of the world the new age movement. They lump the Monotheistic Faiths into the category of materialism, violence, selfishness etc Just as they do the NWO proponents. The New Age Movement offers what people see as a fair, loving, tolerant , unifying, benevolent, spirituality-based world instead of the unloving separatist world that exists with Religion and the Power Elite.

I think stage one was to create organizations for the NWO. Stage two is to pretend to destroy those same organizations and then to replace them with something that appears different yet is in actuality pursuing exactly the same plan.

The goal is to scare people into using things like the law of attraction against the Power Elite. Which is the true snare he all along planned, to have the world worship him and use his powers. So when we fight the NWO people want to fight it using the occult, therefore giving the devil power over them and the world.

This is an ancient conspiracy to destroy true religion by first making it look unkind and unloving, then get humanity to cry out for its destruction. The same with the Governments. Then once both are destroyed the real plan is in place and Lucifer rules Spiritually, Politically and Economically.

Thankfully as Christians we know that this will not last, for Christ will return in all His Glory and destroy what the devil has built up.

Opps sorry for the double post. The system came up with an error and did not show that it posted the comment so I hit submit again, Sorry!


In some ways we are actually talking about the same thing. While I don't neccesarily agree with the traditional comspiritorial view, i.e. banker, elite, world view. There are aspects some in this circle have gotten correct. That being that the desired new societal structure has been funded by very powerfull families like the Rockefellers. However this group misses the direct political arms, many of which have taken place via the UN. You see the destruction China, Russia, and the communists wanted in the 50's and 60's has already happened. It started the moment the United States agreed to implement some of the UN models which were more of a hybrid of communist and socialist ideals. Conflict at this point is used to control the mindset of the people.

In some cases it is now being used as a straw man to change public perception of the old order. One can say all they want about the will of the people, but our government no longer represents the people. If they did, you would find our representatives moving to get us out of some of these international treaties that are nothing more than agreements that erode our freedoms.
JD, Bella:

You've both given me some good things to chew on and to occupy my mind while I do dishes. If I cut myself on a paring knife or something, it's all your fault!

Haha... just kidding.


Thank you JD Susanna, and Dorothy it’s hard to keep up with everything that’s happening all at once so thanks for making it easy to follow.

Don’t mean to move away from the topic but I see a few people mention N.A.M just found 4 new videos posted last week on Raj Patel who I’m keeping my eye on if anyone is interested I recommend you watch all 4 only 10min each I think it’s in pt 1 that he say rockerfella was behind the green revolution then (meaning before) and gates is behind the one now words to that effect.

Thanks again DJ also to you Constance, for been so brave to bring the truth. you woke me up big time.
We know there is a war coming. Gag and Magog war has yet to occor. Gog and Magog is not armeggedon... I believe countries involved in Gag and Magog are Russia, Iran, Turkey (interesting given how US Congress is upsetting Turkey) and Libyia
JD.. This is a verse from the Bible. God's word.
2 Peter 1:20
" Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation."

And this is what you have done, taken a verse from the Bible which, in Greek, has several meanings and derived a world wide conspiracy.
Just to keep the record straight, the research is all JD and Susanna, with JD doing the writing. I'm just a helpful sideline person. I have the greatest respect for the work that they've done. They found an issue and persistently followed the trail, digging through mounds of information until a cohesive pattern appeared.

Anon 4:31,

Firstly I never equated one single piece of information that I have covered with any verse in scripture. I have purposely avoided this, letting the reader draw their own conclusions. This does not mean that I do not hold this view, just that you have placed judgement on me that is wholey inaccurate.

Even if this system has nothing to do with the biblical end, I am still against it. Are you for government mandated pantheism or panentheism? Are you for complete loss of privacy rights? Are you for the erosion of the sovereign United States into a global governance that has freedom in their cross hairs?
"keep the record straight"?

Is 2 Peter 1:20 not straight?

Is JD "not implying" that his RFID idea is a world wide conspiracy?

Is he also "not implying" that it is in reference to the "Mark of the Beast"?

to "keep the record straight" you are saying I have construde the facts about his RFID theory.

Like those on Mars hill, you yearn for what is new instead of what is good.

Like the chief priests and scribes in 3 BC, you know the prophecy but you are so fixated on what you want it to be that when it happens it will hit you blindside.

Revelation is about WATCHING… not interpreting. When you interrupt you run this risk of losing your witness. Then; what answer will you “give to any man” for the hope that is within.
JD If I am on a blog site that is about unicorns, and I write about a white horse with a horn in it’s forehead running around the hills of Virginia, But I never call it a unicorn, AND I get people to follow this idea and maybe even go out and start looking for “My white horse” Dose that give me immunity from ever declaring “ I never said it was a unicorn”.

Seriously whether or not this is the "mark of the beast" or not, it is worth noting the moving and impetetus for this Global tracking and implementation. Yes, there is room for interpretation, but is it not sobering that these things are occuring. While you accept some "mark" gladly protesting it was "not the mark" as it is "open to interpretation?" Very fact is we are living in a world where there is greater and greater drawing information together.
Please, the facts reported what do you think the intent is, is it just to make the world better. The UN and varied people are motivated by their ideas of making the world better, but their ideas are contrary to the Gospel. Please offer your opinion on what the information being examined is about. The other option is to engage in denial and just think everything going on in the world is just to make it better. Nothing to attend to or watch.
Annony, in other words what have your "watched and observed?"

Now you are being ridiculous. I also can't help but notice you are presenting a front argument to avoid answering the very questions I posed to you. First, this is Constance site. If you want to apply your standard to me, you have to apply it to her entire body of work. But your not doing this are you? You see, my work could fall into any section of hers whether it be end times, new age, or apostasy. However for your own convienience you have ignored this little piece in an attempt to bait me into an argument. If you have no issue with a system that promotes ideals that are blatantly against the ten commandments (thou shalt have no other gods before me) then go ahead and support it.

Second your quoting of Peter doesn't even apply. I have never claimed private revelation from the Father, nor am I claiming to have true interpretation of prophecy. I am simply warning of a system that at its base holds principles and teachings that are not christian. If you want to trot down the road to pantheism, who am I to stop you. However this isn't the real issue is it? You keep trying to label me as a conspiracy theorist in an attempt to marginalize me. However your attack fails to reconcile that there is a global body pushing for implementation of this system. It fails to reconcile that the governing body behind it has been pushing for more than half a century to consolidate power into one governing body. It fails to reconcile that the form of government this same body wishes to impose is a form of socialism that would be a death knell to freedoms that most Americans hold dear.

You can keep trying to shoot at me from the weeds, but people are going to see through your arguments. Since you have chosen to attack anonymously, I can only assume you are the same person who has attempted to present this same argument multiple times. That being said, you wouldn't happen to have a conflict of interest that is causing you to attack so passionately would you? Maybe the fact that you work within the industry I am discussing?
Anon 4:31, 6:06

No matter how you view it, RFID will be used for both good and bad. But without doubt this technololgy will diminish your privacy and freedom and enable a level of control that isn't to your best interests. Every part of your life will be monitored making a level of tyrrany possible with it that wouldn't be possible without it.

I've been notified by our utilities company that we will be getting a new thermostat in the house and new utility meeters outide the house that will send regular updates on energy use to the utilities company. They have already stated that they want to be able to control my energy use, of course "to eliminate brown outs" at first. In order to eventually meet Agenda 21 goals, my energy use will need to be substantially controlled and reduced. Most world leaders endorse Agenda 21 -- I know what they want to do, and it's not good. I already know that technology will be used to implement this evil agenda.

I believe JD's articles do an excellent job of bringing to light a critical issue that has immense importance. Whether it's a conspiracy or just an agreed-to agenda, what's the difference, it's happening.

We are told in Scripture to be aware of the seasons and times in which we live. I rather know about this technology instead of ignoring it for fear someone might give a wrong interpretation -- that's where discernment comes in. I have to discern, "make captive," every thought or message, even yours.

JD isn't making this connection, but why are you so sure that this technology won't enable the system prophesied in Scripture? Henry Kissenger has gone on record saying that he believes everyone will be numbered, marked, or tagged by 2017. Is there another system being developed that could be used for that purpose?

Dave in CA
Matthew 25:1-13

Jesus gives this parable:

1 "At that time the kingdom of heaven will be like ten virgins who took their lamps and went out to meet the bridegroom. 2 Five of them were foolish and five were wise. 3 The foolish ones took their lamps but did not take any oil with them. 4 The wise, however, took oil in jars along with their lamps. 5 The bridegroom was a long time in coming, and they all became drowsy and fell asleep.
6 "At midnight the cry rang out: 'Here's the bridegroom! Come out to meet him!'

7 "Then all the virgins woke up and trimmed their lamps. 8 The foolish ones said to the wise, 'Give us some of your oil; our lamps are going out.'

9 " 'No,' they replied, 'there may not be enough for both us and you. Instead, go to those who sell oil and buy some for yourselves.'

10 "But while they were on their way to buy the oil, the bridegroom arrived. The virgins who were ready went in with him to the wedding banquet. And the door was shut.

11 "Later the others also came. 'Sir! Sir!' they said. 'Open the door for us!'

12 "But he replied, 'I tell you the truth, I don't know you.'

13 "Therefore keep watch, because you do not know the day or the hour.
The parable in Matthew 25 refers to be watchful for Jesus' return. In Matthew 24 Jesus gives us the events of what will happen prior to His coming. Should we not watch for these things? There's one piece of information Jesus could not tell us. Exactly when.

Speculating whether or not current events or current people is fulfillment of prophecy is not the same as interpreting. At least, I don't think it is. Could RFID lead to the Mark of the Beast? Maybe, but maybe not. I suspect this is true. JD has never made any mention of being suspicious in this regard. I have, though.

I also have suspicions about Javier Solana being the antichrist. Is he? I don't know. Does this mean I'm disobeying what Peter writes in
2 Peter 1:20? I don't know.
Finally, let's look at 2 Peter 1:20in context here. Let's look at 2 Peter 1:19-21.

19 And we have the word of the prophets made more certain, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts. 20 Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet's own interpretation. 21 For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.

As I read verse 20 in this context, Peter is saying the words of the prophets were justified because their prophecies came from God by the blessedness of the Holy Spirit. Even Peter in verse 19 tells us to pay attention to the words of the prophets. Are the words written by John in Revelation not prophecy?

JD has written his information not in the same vain as the prophets. His words are prophecy. My assumptions of what JD uncovered isn't prophecy. However, my assumptions could be justified by the Holy Spirit. Only time will tell.

Could you clarify this statement?

"JD has written his information not in the same vain as the prophets. His words are prophecy."

I would never make a claim that my words are prophecy. Your intention with the statement is probably less assuming, so I am asking you to clarify.
Bill Gates talks about ‘vaccines to reduce population’

Microsoft founder and one of the world’s wealthiest men, Bill Gates, projects an image of a benign philanthropist using his billions via his (tax exempt) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to tackle diseases, solve food shortages in Africa and alleviate poverty. In a recent conference in California, Gates reveals a less public agenda of his philanthropy—population reduction, otherwise known as eugenics.

Gates made his remarks to the invitation-only Long Beach, California TED2010 Conference, in a speech titled, “Innovating to Zero!.” Along with the scientifically absurd proposition of reducing manmade CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, approximately four and a half minutes into the talk, Gates declares, "First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."1 (author’s emphasis).

In plain English, one of the most powerful men in the world states clearly that he expects vaccines to be used to reduce population growth. When Bill Gates speaks about vaccines, he speaks with authority. In January 2010 at the elite Davos World Economic Forum, Gates announced his foundation would give $10 billion (circa €7.5 billion) over the next decade to develop and deliver new vaccines to children in the developing world. 2

The primary focus of his multi-billion dollar Gates Foundation is vaccinations, especially in Africa and other underdeveloped countries. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a founding member of the GAVI Alliance (Global Alliance for Vaccinations and Immunization) in partnership with the World Bank, WHO and the vaccine industry. The goal of GAVI is to vaccinate every newborn child in the developing world.

more at link
The reason I respond here is several years ago I pointed this blog site out to friends. Your conclusions to your research are myopic. I still think Constance is on to something important. The only thing you are on to is the natural progression of Technology.

Constant's fight is Spiritual, which is why I point people here.

Your fight is not.

Change is inevitable.
Divide and conquer will not be an effective tactic on this board. I published JD's article. I endorse his work.

Anon 8:20,

Again you have ignored the questions posed to you. Again you have attempted to marginalize. You claim it is simply forward progress of technology, while ignoring the basis and principles that are the justification being used for the advancement. So from this I can assume one of two things, either you are unaware of what the principles at work are, I doubt this as I have continually pointed it out, and you choose to not answer to it. Or, you are very aware and choose not to answer as it would give away your true intentions. So which is it? Are you justifying the promotion of state sponsored pantheism or panentheism? Or are you truly ignorant of the ideals and principles behind this technology and it's promotion? It can't be both, but it must be one.
Constance Cumbey said...
I am reading a significant new book which has received heavy publicity lately:


Here's a tangential issue to the communion discussion of a few days ago. "Bishop" T.D. Jakes has a teaching on communion in which he refers to it as a "romantic ordinance" "between two lovers." This heresy is between 16:10 and around 19:00 (afterwards is some typical Word of Faith garbage):

Obviously, he confuses eros love with agape. This is what happens when one adopts the "Bridal Paradigm" teaching as espoused by Mike Bickle of IHOP which leads one to a "Jesus is your boyfriend" type of thing. While Christians are the bride of Christ COLLECTIVELY, we are not individual brides as Jakes (and Bickle) asserts.

One other thing of note: Jakes claims that by ingesting the Eucharist you are receiving Jesus' DNA. This may or not be the same thing; but... on Todd Bentley's now defunct website he referred to DNA as "Divine Nature Activated" -- obvious New Age terms:

In the following article refuting Jakes' teaching, Pastor Larry DeBruyn also talks about the "U2-charist" which uses the music of U2/Bono during communion. [I have an unfinished article on this which I began almost 2 years ago.]:
So, 2 Peter 1:20 is not a command in regards to interpreting prophecy. There is not an implication that doing so is a sin, according to this one verse. It's not a valid argument.
I meant to say it wasn't prophecy, JD.
Sorry, I had two children causing a commotion when I wrote all of what I wrote.

Thanks for the support. I want the readers to see exactly what is happening here and why he refuses to answer my questions. Choosing instead to attack continuously. When based on the principles behind the agenda, there is not a justifiable argument for supporting this system from a christian perspective.

Understandable, I knew you would not want the wrong message inferred on your comment, so I asked you to clarify.
Sorry, JD, I don't think you're a prophet. I read the information you have gathered as possibly leading to the fulfillment of the "mark of the beast." So, I believe it has prophetic implications. That's why I follow this blog, Fulfilled Prophecy, Born to Watch, etc. It all has prophetic implication.

I was also shedding light on anon.'s total misreading of 2 Peter 1:20. If you look at the context of this one verse, you can see clearly anon is mistaken and untruthful.
Folks, I don't want to be giving or implying any personal interpretation, but over on the 70th Week blog Curt says a rabbi has reported there is now a kosher red heifer.
Yes, this is true about the red heifer, I listened to the second half of the Temple Institute's radio program's announced in the last quarter of the program. Of course they won't disclose the location but the Temple Institue definitely made the announcement (I believed last week).
I don't have much to add but wanted to say how interesting the discussion here is.
Lots of good "stuff" pointed out. That business about the wands is shocking. Also the problem about "moderates" in churches is worth thinking a lot about.

In the churches, moderates do bore from within by denying some basic fundamentals of faith, and substituting their own faith doctrines for the old ones. One example of this is that in a church I have attended on and off, they were reading, and many approving, a book by an Episcopal priest denying the resurrection of Jesus, and also denying the Virgin Birth. I complained loudly and left the church. Later, I find the church has gone back to traditional beliefs.

Anyway, I have seen this boring from within many times. Discernment was never more needed, as Jesus warned for the last days.
It is actually exhausting that we cannot depend on church leaders to try to PREACH THE GOSPEL, as they vowed to do when they were ordained, and as they are now paid to do!


I assumed there was a mistake. I have had issues with this person since Constance posted the announcement about me writing these articles. I was attacked in emails, and it has continued here. I received the first email before my first article was even published. The person doing this is employed in a industry involved with RFID. They refuse to answer questions about the principles behind its massive implementation, and have multiple times quoted scripture in the wrong context to try and show me the error of my thinking. I wish I could say that this person was simply mistaken, but the more interaction I have with them, the more their nature shows through.
yes, change is inevitable, the changes happening are leading to the end. Technology is but works of man. Here for awhile, then gone. Note that technology has been really about the business of "De-bablefication" of the world and advancing the "ways" of man. Technology reduces "work" but ultimately adds to suffering. Technology also increases the ways and distrubutions of the wormwoord we surround ourselves with. Now that being said, I enjoy the use and benefits of technology.

And yes, change is coming, it is Biblically indicated. Yet, some change that is coming, is for ill, and not good.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Another factor of Big Brother here.
CNN, once again, reporting the latest earthquake in its headlines. This one a 5.9 in turkey. At least 38 killed is the count for now... homes collapsed... I keep seeing these earthquakes on the CNN breaking headlines on my phone... It's alarming how frequently they're occurring and how close together.
Oops, forgot the link:
BattleCreekDavid I posted 2 peter 1:20... Not an interpretation,, just the verse which my pastor, Ray Bentley went over last Sunday. This verse means exactly what is says,, context here only strengthens the meaning. It is GOD who will interpret (FULLFILL) his prophecies, not man. That is what makes it "more sure word of prophecy", because it comes from God. Peters life on earth is at an end here, he wants to comfort those he is leaving by reminding them of the proof they have for what they believe in.
Anon @ 3:01pm:

Not an interpretation,, just the verse which my pastor, Ray Bentley went over last Sunday. This verse means exactly what is says,, context here only strengthens the meaning. It is GOD who will interpret (FULLFILL) his prophecies, not man. That is what makes it "more sure word of prophecy", because it comes from God.

With all due respect you and your pastor are both incorrect in your "interpretation" of this passage. BattleCreekDavid was correct @ 7:37pm with his words:

As I read verse 20 in this context, Peter is saying the words of the prophets were justified because their prophecies came from God by the blessedness of the Holy Spirit. Even Peter in verse 19 tells us to pay attention to the words of the prophets.

I will restate a different way of this helps to clear this up: Peter's main point was that all prophecies in Scripture emanated from God through the prophets and NOT be their own interpretation [see 2 Timothy 3:16]. Bottom line is all prophecy in the Bible is 100% true.

Peter then compares with the false prophets/teachers of the whole of the 2nd Chapter by beginning with the word "But:"

1But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them—bringing swift destruction on themselves.

Peter was comparing and contrasting between true and false prophets/teachers.

So, 2 Peter 1:20 does not mean that we are not to attempt to interpret prophecy. In fact, one of the problems with the "church" is it largely ignores prophecy which is itself about 1/3 of the entirety of Scripture, especially eschatology. Yet, "they perish for lack of knowledge." As was pointed out, we are to "keep watch."
People ARE hungry for prophecy. The churches which are small and dying refuse to incorporate prophecy studies. The churches which are large and growing use a lot of prophecy studies.

Now the small churches may be preaching the core gospel better, at least sometimes, than the mega-churches. But if they also studied prophecy, they could grow and prosper like the megas.

I told them this at the church I am attending, and they did not listen.
They have only 37 pledging families.
They would attract the young in the neighborhood if they studied prophecy. They say, "well, we do teach it as it comes up in the weekly lessons in the church service." They do, and do it well.
However, the people want MORE at this time in history, as they know they need it.


Keep up the great work mate....

Listen to God and seek His will in all this. You know ppl will pull you down specially when you going the God's work.

David said

I understand you perfectly what you saying and any one with half a brain can see it to. You have a great support here with Constance and others including me..

JD has written his information not in the same vain as the prophets. His words are prophecy. My assumptions of what JD uncovered isn't prophecy. However, my assumptions could be justified by the Holy Spirit. Only time will tell.

David said about the

Ten virgins...Matthew 25:1-13
I for one hope to be one of them along with you guys..

Gosh I think I need Clayton's Gin and tonic and perhaps a slab of Roo steak on the Babbie!

Just kidding guys life can get very serious at times and we just need to sit back and have a good laugh at our selves or the world.

Hope I have not offended anyone here with my post.

Dorothy this is for you girl.. I love shrimp on the Babbie but I refrain from doing sooooo lol

Hugs and God bless you all
Sorry text is all over the place had a Opp. last week still feel the effects of anesthetic and very sore mouth stitches etc.....God is So GOOD.
Aussie girl,

Thanks for your words of encouragment. My Father alone truly knows the intentions of my spirit. As such it is only His righteous judgement that I will concern myself with.
A huge Amen brother
An identifier is not an "RFID chip." In fact, there is no such thing as an RFID chip. You clearly lack a substantive understanding about networking and RFID, and all of the various concepts you discuss. You know just enough jargon to make it sound like you know what you're talking about. But you don't. There have been issues and questions related to RFID, and there have been issues and questions related to a unique health identifier. They are not related. If you want to actually participate in the dicussion on these topics, do some research.
Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]