Saturday, May 30, 2020

The Revolution IS being televised!

I was quietly working at my computer tonight, trying to figure out how to use Zoom for communication.  I spent a few hours watching how to YouTube videos and reviewing some books in my library.  I finally decided it was time to call it a night and retire to bed. 

My husband called out, "Connie, have you seen this?"  I thought perhaps he was watching a movie or had made a YouTube music video find.  There on the screen was obviously what appears to be a full blown revolution in progress.  It was progressing exactly as the New Age books and publications had described it might when I discovered that Movement back in 1981. 

Isobel Blackthorn, to my amusement, suggested in her books on the life of Alice Ann Bailey that I had slowed the "progress" of Alice Bailey's dreams by nearly 40 years.  Be that as it may, it appears to me that it IS happening and it IS HAPPENING NOW!

Chris Cuomo on CNN just announced the Supreme Court had just released a decision against the California church challenging the right to gather restrictions under the guise of the Pandemic emergency orders.  According to Cuomo, the United States Supreme Court had ruled 5 to 4 with Justice Roberts siding with the liberal judges on the bench that there was not an unfettered right to worship -- to believe, yes, but to worship, no.

As Jesus warned his disciples, "Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is night:  so likewise ye, when ye shall see all these tings, know that is near, even at the doors.  Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.  Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away."  (Matthew 24: 32-35, KJV)

Scoffers over the years have claimed that Jesus told his own generation they would not pass until all was fulfilled.   Clearly, the context of Jesus' remarks in that same context indicated that these were things that would take place over a long period of time.  He was instructing that the generation alive when these things began to happen would not pass until all was fulfilled.  There would be world wars, earthquakes, false christs and messiahs arising deceiving many.  Further, Jesus said (Matthew 24:6:  And ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars:  see that ye be not troubled:  for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.  For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom:  and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers[e] places.  All these are the beginning of sorrows."

It appears to me that the prophesied times are here.  I am fearful for those who thought they would be raptured out before they came -- that they would be in heaven in 3 1/2 years before the antichrist was revealed.  Clearly, such a teaching contradicts Scripture.  Read 2 Thessalonians very carefully.  The gathering together to our Lord would not occur until after the Man of Perdition was revealed.

May the Lord strengthen our faith and our resolve to "keep on keeping on."  We must trust God now matter how it comes down.  He's got the big picture, we've got the little one. 

Stay faithful and stay tuned!

CONSTANCE

536 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 400 of 536   Newer›   Newest»
Craig said...

Anon 6:54 AM and 9:53 AM,

I confess I cannot find the atheist here. Can you point me to a comment or comments that illustrate this?

Anonymous said...

While I have enjoyed watching Jordan Peterson speak on PC issues. He is a likeable person and has had considerable suffering in his life, especially as of late. I keep in in my prayers for salvation, and healing. Nevertheless Christians always have opportunity to share the gospel.

Anonymous said...

"I keep him in my prayers" 10:17 post should read

Anonymous said...

This illustrates the power of loving one individual at a time.

This is from Caroline Crockett Brock

I am a 45 year old white woman living in the south, and today was the first time I spoke frankly about racism with a black man. When Ernest, my appliance repairman, came to the front door, I welcomed him in. As this was his second visit and we’d established a friendly rapport, I asked him how he was feeling in the current national climate. Naturally, he assumed I was talking about the coronavirus, because what white person actually addresses racism head on, in person, in their own home? When Ernest realized I wanted to know about his experience with racism, he began answering my questions.

What’s it like for you on a day-to-day basis as a black man? Do cops ever give you any trouble?

The answers were illuminating.

Ernest, a middle-aged, friendly, successful business owner, gets pulled over in Myrtle Beach at least 6 times a year. He doesn’t get pulled over for traffic violations, but on the suspicion of him being a suspect in one crime or another. Mind you, he is in uniform, driving in a work van clearly marked with his business on the side. They ask him about the boxes in his car--parts and pieces of appliances. They ask to see his invoices and ask him why there is money and checks in his invoice clipboard. They ask if he’s selling drugs. These cops get angry if he asks for a badge number or pushes back in any way. Everytime he is the one who has to explain himself, although they have no real cause to question him.

Ernest used to help folks out after dark with emergencies. Not anymore. He does not work past dinnertime, not because he doesn’t need the business, but because it isn’t safe for him to be out after dark. He says “There’s nothing out there in the world for me past dark”.

Let me say that again. Ernest, a middle aged black man in uniform cannot work past dark in Myrtle Beach in 2020 because it’s not safe for him. He did not say this with any kind of agenda. It was a quiet, matter of fact truth.
A truth that needs to be heard.

When I asked Ernest what ethnic terms he gets offended at, he said that the most offensive term people use is ‘boy’. Ernest has a bachelors in electronics and an associates in HVAC. He is not a ‘boy’, and the term ‘boy’ in the south implies inferiority in station and status. He came to Myrtle Beach and got a job at Hobart. The supervisor repeatedly used the term ‘boy’. Ernest complained. After several complaints Ernest was fired.

Ernest says most white people are a little scared of him, and he’s often put in a position where he has to prove himself, as though he’s not qualified to repair appliances.

After getting a job for 2 years at Sears appliance, Ernest started his own company, one he’s been running for several years. He is the best repairman we’ve had, and has taught me about washer dryers and how to maintain them myself, even helping me with another washer/dryer set and a dishwasher without charging me. I highly recommend his company, Grand Strand Appliance.

I asked Ernest what he thought of “black bike week” in Myrtle Beach, where thousands of black people come with bullet bikes and trash our town. He says it hurts black people in our city, and he disagrees with the NAACP coming in to sue businesses that close on black bike week. He hates working that week.

Ernest doesn’t have hope that racism will change, no matter who the president is. His dad taught him “It’s a white man’s world”, and he’s done his best to live within it.
When I asked him what I could do, he said, “everyone needs to pray and realize we’re all just one country and one people”.

I am a 45 year old white woman living in the south. I can begin healing our country by talking frankly with African Americans in my world---by LISTENING to their lived experience and speaking up. I can help by actively promoting black owned businesses. That’s what I can do today. Let’s start by listening and lifting up. It’s that simple.
#listenandlift

Anonymous said...

Christine:

https://www.jspell.com/checker/

Anonymous said...

'The Saker': The Systemic Collapse Of The US Society Has Begun

https:// www.zerohedge.com/markets/saker-systemic-collapse-us-society-has-begun

Anonymous said...

Craig 9:13 AM,

I agree there is bias against old white men in academia. Just look at all the bias against Jesus Christ! If only Christians would become as passionate about anti-Christian bias as they are about anti-male bias and anti-white bias. Then maybe the root cause of all bias could have a chance to improve, simultaneously removing all credibility from SJWs -- and loving and not hating white males.

Craig said...

Anon 10:17/19 AM,

I’m not trying to be a nitpicker here, but I do wish to address this: Nevertheless Christians always have opportunity to share the gospel.

Now, of course, I will assume by always you mean not ‘at all times and everywhere’, but even with that clarified I still question your statement. Have you not heard about Right-leaning events on campuses being canceled due to threats of bodily harm (and etc.) preceding them?

----

Anon 10:36 AM,

Respectfully, you’ve read too much into what I stated. I neither said nor meant to imply anything about “white men in academia”. Here in this particular comment I’m not saying that what you’ve said there is either true or untrue.

I’m going to guess that you noticed that Peterson and Pinker are white and that Pinker criticized intolerant Leftists when the call those on the right Nazis, and used that as the basis for your statement. Correct me if I’m wrong. In any case, you may not be aware but when certain Leftists call others “Nazis” on account of their right-leaning stances, it is without regard to race. In other words, I’ve seen various races called “Nazi”, to include blacks, Hispanics, and Jews (think Ben Shapiro, e.g.). At root, it’s an extreme form of the Alinsky tactic of demonizing your opponent. Never mind that it’s ridiculous to call Jews and blacks “Nazi”.

While Peterson has been vilified by Leftists, Pinker has not and, from what I can tell, is largely respected.

The problem of anti-male and anti-white bias can be fought in the larger context of identity politics by staunch rejection of it.

Anonymous said...

Update to 10:24 AM:

=====
Edit: I asked Ernest if I could take his picture and post our conversation on facebook. He thought it was a great idea. As he left my house an hour later, he looked me in the eye and said, "If you ever march, or have a meeting on this topic, or want to change things in Myrtle Beach, I'll stand with you."
What a great idea. Let's begin standing together.

===
Edit: 1pm EST on 6/1. Ernest just called me and we had one of the sweetest moments, both laughing and crying about the response to this post. He started the conversation by saying, "Caroline, I don't know if I should kill you or kiss you--my phone is ringing off the hook!"

He doesn't have a FB profile, so he's coming over later so I can help him set one up. He's been absolutely overwhelmed, as have I, with the response. We're going to be sitting down together to read your comments. They mean so much. In addition, the Myrtle Beach city manager has contacted me and I'm getting all of us together to be sure this doesn't happen in our city any longer. THANK YOU WORLD.

Edit 6/2 9am. Just got off the phone with Ernest and the local news. They will be interviewing us today, and it will be on the local news in Myrtle beach tonight. I'll post it on my page later.

This is how we change our country. Normal folks. One town at a time.

Anonymous said...

Craig 10:53 AM,

You said, "The problem of anti-male and anti-white bias can be fought in the larger context of identity politics by staunch rejection of it."

It can be, or it should be?

It's been said by Leftists that "you can't dismantle the master's house using the master's tools". I wonder, can non-Leftists dismantle Alinsky's or Marx's house using Alinsky's or Marx's tools?

How has that been working out?

Anonymous said...

11:08 AM

WELL DONE!

I have a feeling that you'd really like another 'Go-Getter', Daisy Luther:

Click HERE for Preppers Daily News

Anonymous said...

11:12 AM

It doesn't work well. The weapons of our warfare are not carnal.

Anonymous said...

Never mind that it's ridiculous to call Jews and blacks "Nazi"

So are you saying there are no blacks or Jews who are Nazi? None?

Not trying to nitpick or anything

Craig said...

Anon 12:07 PM,

To answer your question: Yes. Can you provide an example of a Jew or black who is a Nazi?

Anonymous said...

11:08 AM

What exactly does "THANK YOU WORLD" mean? I'm not sure I have ever heard anyone say that? To me it's really strange, and creepy!

RayB said...

Anonymous said (in part) @ 3:22 AM

"Ray....now I get it. You prefer 30 year old, pompous, incomprehensible, uber-secular, socialist, intellectuals with British accents like Nathan Robinson. He's so secular he doesn't even like atheists because their views/beliefs are something or another --- Nathan Robinson."

Anonymous,

No, you don't "get it." For your information, I was responding SPECIFICALLY to an ARTICLE that was referenced by Anonymous @ 4:32 PM. I have never visited the site before, and have never read anything by "Nathan Robinson" nor have I ever even heard of him before.

And no, I do not "prefer" anything of the sort of which you have so recklessly asserted. If this Nathan Robinson is all that you claim to be, then even "a blind squirrel finds an acorn now and then" seems to be applicable. Whatever the case, he pretty much described Jordan Peterson accurately, IMO.

Anonymous said...

After Saying "Stay Home, Save Lives" And Shuttering Parliament, Trudeau Attends Packed Protest Without Social-Distancing

http://www.zerohedge.com/political/after-stay-home-save-lives-and-shutting-parliament-trudeau-attends-packed-protest

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 12:18 AM Said...

"What exactly does 'THANK YOU WORLD' mean? I'm not sure I have ever heard anyone say that? To me it's really strange, and creepy!"

I totally agree in that this is undoubtedly the
strangest, creepiest music in history:

"Thank You World is the tenth studio album by American country music group The Statler Brothers.It was released in 1974 via Mercury Records.The album peaked at number 36 on the Billboard Top Country Albums chart.. Track listing. Side 1 'Thank You World' (Don Reid, Lew DeWitt)"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thank_You_World

Anonymous said...

Why yes Craig, My Jewish ex wife believed Jews, and blacks were evil, and inferior. We lived in Coeur d Alene Idaho back then, and it was her stated wish to attend the church in Hayden Lake that flew the Nazi flag! I talked her out of it. Also look into the Reverend Valentine (black guy), who was the 'spiritual advisor' for the Matrix films. Years after my divorce from my mentioned ex wife, a black friend of mine allowed me to view, what he described as an 'underground' video of Reverend Valentine, who is very much a Nazi! He told me blacks have materials that white people never see. I did watch a video about five years ago, I think it was in Philadelphia?,of a white guy who tried to enter a black culture bookstore. He was not allowed entry. I have met several blacks over the years who are into the Matrix religion, which I consider Nazism. Good luck finding the video produced by Reverend Valentine, I have not found it myself. That gives me an idea though. I have recently met the owner of the Raven bookstore chain, when I see him next I will see if he can get me a copy, and I will share it.

Craig said...

Anon 11:12 AM & 12:00 PM,

Did Paul not use his ‘worldly’ status as a Roman citizen to appeal to Caesar (Acts 25:11)?

Did Paul not claim that he’d become a Jew to the Jew and a Greek to the Greek in order to win some to Christ (I Corinthians 9:19-23)?

On Mars Hill, did Paul not frame his argument by using their pagan worship to UNKNOWN GOD as a means by which to preach the Gospel? Did he not even do so by seemingly acceding to their pagan views as the means by which to present the Gospel message? By “acceding” I mean that he purposely chose an ambiguous word that could either be understood positively or negatively. Was he saying religious (Acts 17:22) in a positive sense or a negative sense? If it was understood as negative—as the KJV implies with its use of superstitious—then he would have immediately lost his audience. That at least some of Paul’s audience did not understand him as being condescending is proven by the context and the conclusion of this passage (Acts 17:33). Was Paul compromising here? Was Paul being carnal?

Anonymous said...

Where would we be if the prophetess Christine didn't swoop in every Sunday and straighten us all out? How on earth would we manage without her?

Craig said...

Anon 1:14 PM,

Re: My Jewish ex wife believed Jews, and blacks were evil, and inferior.

In some measure, it depends on how one defines the term. Firstly, to use the term to apply to most anyone today is anachronistic, strictly speaking. That is, the term applied to the WWII times, not today. (That doesn’t mean there aren’t a few living WWII Nazis somewhere.)

But there are certainly neo-Nazis today.

But even the way you’ve used it in the quote above—the way your ex-wife seemingly (as reported here by you) understood it—is self-refuting, self-contradictory. If she believes Jews collectively are inferior to her, then what does that make her, as a Jew? It’s not as though she can literally step out of her own skin.

And the blacks you described are racists by definition, not “Nazis”.

I do not accept the new meaning, as adopted by some, of a person who is fanatically dedicated to or seeks to regulate a specified activity, practice, etc. To me this minimizes the horrors of the holocaust.

Anonymous said...

Principalities and Powers are spiritually rooted. To think that Nazi elements in governments, and in their citizens have gone bye bye, is childishly ignorant! That's what they want you to believe.

Craig said...

Anon 2:51,

Yes, principalities and powers are spiritually rooted. They've been around before the Nazism of WWII. Their "elements in governments, and in their citizens" have existed before WWII and continue today.

But there were no Nazis prior to WWII era. And there are few actual living Nazis today.

Craig said...

Now THIS is the model for how police should interact with the people they are “To Serve and Protect”. I’ve seen this video before, but recent events make this all the more relevant:

Photo of police officer consoling teen goes viral

Craig said...

...can't believe I got the police motto wrong...

Anonymous said...

REGARDING NAZISM & SOCIALISM

The Establishment promotes the idea of the inevitability of Communism through its perversion of terms used in describing the political spectrum. (See Chart 1) We are told that on the far Left of the political spectrum we find Communism, which is admittedly dictatorial. But, we are also told that equally to be feared is the opposite of the far Left, i.e., the far Right, which is labeled Fascism. We are constantly told that we should all try
to stay in the middle of the road, which is termed democracy, but by which the Establishment means Fabian (or creeping) socialism. (The fact that the middle of the road has been moving. inexorably leftward for many years is ignored.) Here is an excellent example of the use of false alternatives. We are given the choice between Communism (international socialism) on one end of the spectrum Nazism (national socialism) on the other end, or Fabian socialism in the middle.

The whole spectrum is socialist!

This is absurd. Where would you put an anarchist on this spectrum? Where do you put a person who believes in a Constitutional Republic and the free enterprise system? He is not represented here, yet this spectrum is used for political definitions by a probable ninety percent of the people of the nation.

Chart 1 depicts a false Left-Right political spectrum used by Liberals which has Communism (International Socialism) on the far Left and its twin, Fascism (National Socialism [Nazism]) on the far Right with the "middle of the road" being Fabian Socialism.

The ENTIRE spectrum is Socialist!

Anonymous said...

Chart 2 is a more rational political spectrum with TOTAL government in any form on the far Left and NO government or anarchy on the far right. The U.S. was a Republic with a limited government, but for [more than a century] we have been moving leftward across the spectrum towards total government with each new piece of socialist legislation. There is an accurate political spectrum. (See Chart 2.) Communism is, by definition, total government. If you have total government it makes little difference whether you call it Communism, Fascism, Socialism, Caesarism or Pharaohism. It's all pretty much the same from the standpoint of the people who must live and suffer under it. If total government (by any of its pseudonyms) stands on the far Left, then by logic the far Right should represent anarchy, or no government. Our Founding Fathers revolted against the near-total government of the English monarchy. But they knew that having no government at all would lead to chaos. So they set up a Constitutional Republic with a very limited government. They knew that men prospered in freedom. Although the free enterprise system is not mentioned specifically in the Constitution, it is the only one which can exist under a Constitutional Republic. All collectivist systems require power in government which the Constitution did not grant. Our Founding Fathers had no intention of allowing the government to become an instrument to steal the fruit of one man's labor and give it to another who had not earned it. Our government was to be one of severely limited powers. Thomas Jefferson said: "In questions of power then let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the 'Constitution." Jefferson knew that if the government were not enslaved, people soon would be.

It was Jefferson's view that government governs best which governs least. Our forefathers established this country with the very least possible amount of 'government. Although they lived in an age before automobiles, electric lights and television, they understood human nature and its relation to political systems far better than do most Americans today. Times change, technology changes, but principles are eternal. Primarily, government was to provide for national defense and to establish a court system. But we have burst the chains that Jefferson spoke of and for many years now we have been moving leftward across the political spectrum toward collectivist total government. Every proposal by our political leaders (including some which are supposed to have the very opposite effect, such as 'revenue sharing' proposals) carries us further leftward to centralized government. This is not because socialism is inevitable. It is no more inevitable than Pharaohism. It is largely the result of clever planning and patient gradualism.
Since all Communists and their Insider bosses are waging a constant struggle for SOCIALISM, let us define that term. Socialism is usually defined as government ownership and/or control over the basic means of production and distribution of goods and services. When analyzed this means government control over everything, including
you. All controls are "people" controls. If the government controls these areas it can eventually do just exactly as Marx set out to do: DESTROY the right to private property,
eliminate the family and wipe out religion!"


-Pages 17-19 of NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY

paul said...

Joel's army?
What's hard to understand about Joel's army?
Chapter 2 and verse 25 tells us exactly what Joel's army is. Actually Joel's army is evident in the very first chapter starting from verse 4.
Try reading the text.

GrantNZ said...

New Zealand now has no cases of covid19.
All goes back normal from midnight apart from total border control.

GrantNZ said...

"All lives matter"

RayB said...

GrantNZ ...

I agree with you 100% on "All Lives Matter," (including those in the womb of their mother).

Here in the US, the BLM Marxists have effectively labeled that statement here as being representative of "White Supremacy."

RayB said...

Has Trump lost control as Commander in Chief? Is the Pentagon now operating outside the Constitutional authority of the President?

In direct defiance of President Trump, Sec. of Defense Mark Esser ordered 5,000 active duty troops to "return to base." Trump had ordered these troops to be assembled in the DC area as a "show of force" in order to quell any potential violence in that may occur during the planned "Million Man March" protest in DC this weekend. Esser also ordered the National Guard troops in DC to disarm. This is a very dangerous situation, where the Constitutional Executive powers of the Presidency is at risk.

While millions of Americans and businesses have had their freedoms and liberties suspended, Black Lives Matter and ANTIFA anarchists have taken over many of the streets and cities of America, with practically a freehand to loot, burn and kill.

We very well may be witnessing the end of America as we know it, and that is not hyperbole !

Don't believe it? Watch what Rick Wiles has to say about all of this, and more, here:

https://www.trunews.com/stream/red-dawn-alert-violent-communist-revolution-sweeping-usa-cities-and-towns

Anonymous said...

Coincidence Theorists See All Donut And No Holes In The Coronation Of The Cult

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/coincidence-theorists-see-all-donuts-and-no-holes-coronation-cult

This post from zerohedge is a good synopsis of what is taking place right now, and should alert us to the fact that the first seal rider on the white horse is conquering, and will continue to conquer!

Anonymous said...

Coincidence Theorists See All Donut And No Holes In The Coronation Of The Cult

Anonymous said...

Thanks 12:03 PM

Anonymous said...

Peterson is quite banal, isn't he? Just like that know-all Erikson commenter here!

Anonymous said...

^^^^banal^^^^

Anonymous said...

Did not the Protocols of Zion AND the letter of Albert Pike say that mankind will be brought to its KNEES, exhausted physically, morally, financially, goaded into fighting
sides' until a full synthesis emerges? Look what we have here now.

Anonymous said...



Yes, ^^^^^banal^^^^^^, as in advanced studies in applied stupidity, University of Toronto

Anonymous said...

RayB posted...

"Sec. of Defense Mark Esser ordered 5,000 active duty troops to 'return to base.' Trump had ordered these troops to be assembled in the DC area as a 'show of force' in order to quell any potential violence in that may occur during the planned 'Million Man March' protest in DC this weekend. Esser also ordered the National Guard troops in DC to disarm. This is a very dangerous situation".

Yes it certainly is, and hopefully just where the "Constitutional Executive powers of the Presidency is at risk" and (bad as that is) nothing even more important is being put at risk by Esser's 'interesting' actions.

Anonymous said...

Oregon Rancher Receives Government Request To Survey His Property – Read His Brilliant Response

By Mark Meckler
PATHEOS


So many people cave in and bend over backwards to accommodate the most ridiculous requests of federal and state governments, but this story is a reminder of how we all should respond when bureaucrats come knocking at our doors.

Oregon ranchers Larry and Amanda Anderson received a letter by the Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife asking for permission to survey their land in order to track a nearly endangered species. The letter requested use of the landowners’ creek to document the amphibian life represented, specifically the foothill yellow-legged frog which is noted to have recently declined in population. If the Anderson’s agreed to give the department access, they were ensured as being responsible for “the conservation of this important species.”

But the Andersons weren’t exactly interested and noticed an opportunity to turn the tables on the request and apply a little “Golden Rule” justice, or at least doing unto the government as is so often done unto them.

The Andersons constructed one of the best come-back letters of all time. The only way to truly appreciate it is to read it in its entirety:

Dear Mr. Niemela:

Thank you for your inquiry regarding accessing our property to survey for the yellow-legged frog. We may be able to help you out with this matter.

We have divided our 2.26 acres into 75 equal survey units with a draw tag for each unit. Application fees are only $8.00 per unit after you purchase the “Frog Survey License” ($120.00 resident / $180.00 Non-Resident). You will also need to obtain a “Frog Habitat” parking permit ($10.00 per vehicle). You will also need an “Invasive Species” stamp ($15.00 for the first vehicle and $5.00 for each add’l vehicle) You will also want to register at the Check Station to have your vehicle inspected for non-native plant life prior to entering our property. There is also a Day Use fee, $5.00 per vehicle.

If you are successful in the Draw you will be notified two weeks in advance so you can make necessary plans and purchase your “Creek Habitat” stamp. ($18.00 Resident / $140.00 Non-Resident). Survey units open between 8am and 3pm but you cannot commence survey until 9am and must cease all survey activity by 1pm.

Survey Gear can only include a net with a 2″ diameter made of 100% organic cotton netting with no longer than an 18″ handle, non-weighted and no deeper than 6′ from net frame to bottom of net. Handles can only be made of BPA-free plastics or wooden handles. After 1pm you can use a net with a 3″ diameter if you purchase the “Frog Net Endorsement” ($75.00 Resident / $250 Non-Resident). Any frogs captured that are released will need to be released with an approved release device back into the environment unharmed.

As of June 1, we are offering draw tags for our “Premium Survey” units and application is again only $8.00 per application. However, all fees can be waived if you can verify Native Indian Tribal rights and status.

You will also need to provide evidence of successful completion of “Frog Surveys and You” comprehensive course on frog identification, safe handling practices, and self-defense strategies for frog attacks. This course is offered online through an accredited program for a nominal fee of $750.00.

Please let us know if we can be of assistance to you. Otherwise, we decline your access to our property but appreciate your inquiry.

Sincerely,
Larry & Amanda Anderson

Anonymous said...

Pure genius and a testament to the Anderson’s resolve to stand up to an intrusive government.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/markmeckler/2016/06/oregon-rancher-receives-government-request-to-survey-his-property-read-his-brilliant-response
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/06/this-is-how-all-bureaucrats-should-be-answered.php

Anonymous said...

China & Russia Bombard US With "You Reap What You Sow" Messages Amid Unrest & Instability

Also as China's Global Times editor poses, "who is more like Nazi Germany?"

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/china-russia-bombard-us-you-reap-what-you-sow-messages-amid-unrest-instability

Anonymous said...

How Did the Obama Foundation Tweet a George Floyd Poster on May 17, when he wasn't Killed until May 25?


https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/news-nation/how-did-the-obama-foundation-tweet-a-george-floyd-poster-on-may-17-when-he-wasn-t-killed-until-may-25

Friends, could we also stop using 'their' words and language in our daily speech and writing? Words like 'issue' (instead of 'problem'), 'concern', 'provide', 'respond',
'gender' (instead of 'sex'). It's sickening, they all speak the same.
You'll feel fresh if you do this. Let's use our thesaurus.

Anonymous said...

The increasing encroachment of SOFT LANGUAGE

Anonymous said...

"Hal Turner's viewpoints typically encompass Holocaust denial,[1] conspiracy theory, white supremacy,[citation needed] and have included calls for assassination of government officials. In August 2010, he was convicted for making threats against three federal judges with the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, for which he spent two years in prison."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Turner

Anonymous said...

How did the Obama Foundation post this photo of a George Floyd poster on May 17 when he died on May 25?

DestroyedArkana said...


"The website it's linked to changed its image and that was updated on the tweet. The image wasn't embedded in the tweet itself.
. . .
"That tweet does not have an image connected to it, only an auto-image from linking to obama.org. You can see that with the banner connected to the bottom of the picture."

https://www.reddit.com/r/kotakuinaction2/comments/gy5d29/how_did_the_obama_foundation_post_this_photo_of_a

Anonymous said...

Minneapolis riots were pre-planned.

What you are about to see is part of a two year undercover investigation into the leftist radicalization imbedded within the climate justice movement that contributed to the riots in Minneapolis, Minnesota. In this first video, we are going to show how the Sunrise Movement played a preemptive role in carrying out the mayhem to further push their Green New Deal agenda and promoting the abolition of the police.

Video . . .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgsnyHILdb8





Anonymous said...

Former USA football player, Larry Johnson, outright charges that the George Floyd death was a human Masonic 'sacrifice'

https://www.totalprosports.com/2020/06/01/larry-johnson-exposes-freemason-stephen-jackson-sacrificing-george-floyd-tweet/

Maya Santamaria is a Latina media and entertainment mogul who had owned the El Nuevo Rodeo Nightclub, where policeman Derek Chauvin and George Floyd both worked as bouncers, the club at 2709 E Lake St, Minneapolis ... fellow club bouncers then, partners in staged theatre now?

That nightclub turns out to be adjacent to another property also owned by Santamaria, the ancient hall of the International Order of Odd Fellows, at 2701 E Lake St Minneapolis, now called the '27 Event Center', but with the IOOF letters still on the facade

https://www.startribune.com/old-odd-fellows-lodges-thrive-as-neighborhood-connectors/302168611/

Odd Fellows are fully parallel alt-Masons: "The two Fraternities are very similar in symbolism they use, values they share, and the way they began. Both Fraternities use many of the same symbols - the All-Seeing Eye, the Sun and Moon, the Bible, the Beehive.

Anonymous said...

George Floyd was killed by Minneapolis Police on May 25th. So how does the Obama Foundation have a George Floyd Poster in a tweet they posted on May 17th?

https://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2020/06/hal-turner-how-did-the-obama-foundation-tweet-a-george-floyd-poster-on-may-17-when-he-wasnt-killed-until-may-25-2517192.html






Anonymous said...

It must be Let's Be Repetitive Day. Okay!

"Hal Turner's viewpoints typically encompass Holocaust denial,[1] conspiracy theory, white supremacy,[citation needed] and have included calls for assassination of government officials. In August 2010, he was convicted for making threats against three federal judges with the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, for which he spent two years in prison."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Turner

How did the Obama Foundation post this photo of a George Floyd poster on May 17 when he died on May 25?

DestroyedArkana said...

"The website it's linked to changed its image and that was updated on the tweet. The image wasn't embedded in the tweet itself.
. . .
"That tweet does not have an image connected to it, only an auto-image from linking to obama.org. You can see that with the banner connected to the bottom of the picture."

https://www.reddit.com/r/kotakuinaction2/comments/gy5d29/how_did_the_obama_foundation_post_this_photo_of_a

Anonymous said...

The three Rs:

Repetition
Repetition
Repetition

The Fall - Repetition

Anonymous said...

Trump pushes bizarre conspiracy theory that the 75-year-old man pushed to ground by Buffalo cops was 'an ANTIFA provocateur' trying to 'scan police communications' and exaggerated his fall

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8402729/Donald-Trump-trumpets-bizarre-conspiracy-theory-75-year-old-man-Buffalo-cops-pushed-ground.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ico=taboola_feed

_____________________________________________________________________________

Just for the sake of argument . . .

Of course, the media (who hates Trump anyway) dismisses this as the President having a 'conspiracy theory'... never mind that President Trump actually DOES have access to inside information from multiple intelligence sources (including police departments).



Anonymous said...

Yep... these are ALL conspiracy theories, because everybody KNOWS that these peaceful demonstrators just want to hold hands and sing "Kumbaya". There is no further 'agenda' (how could anyone even suggest such a thing?). Now, just move along; there is nothing to see here, folks. LOL

Anonymous said...

Massive protest in Hollywood into "F**k the Police" music video!!!

https://www.tmz.com/2020/06/08/black-lives-matter-los-angeles-hollywood-yg-music-vid-celebs/




Anonymous said...

Correction... 12:22 PM post should read: 'turns into'.

RayB said...

Update on the life of George Floyd (what the media isn't telling you about George Floyd):

Candace Owens did research to verify this information:

George Floyd did 5 separate stints in Prison, mainly for Cocaine related charges.

One of Floyd's Prison stints was as a result of an armed home invasion of a pregnant Black woman. Floyd held a loaded gun to the belly of the terrified victim, threatening that if she moved or resisted, he would shoot her, while 3 other "friends" of Floyd ransacked the woman's residence in search of money and drugs. Floyd received 5 years for his part in this crime. Just wondering ... did the terrorized pregnant Black women's life "matter?"

George Floyd also had at least 2 children from 2 separate "baby Mamas." While the media "reports" that the CHILDREN were "estranged" from their Father, it was the other way around. Floyd reneged on his responsibilities to these two children, having not even seen either one of them in over 15 years. In fact, when the children saw their "father" on the news after his death, they didn't even know who he was.

Floyd's forensic autopsy has revealed that he had methamphetamine and fentanyl in his body at the time of death, indicating that these two substances could have played a part in his inability to breathe properly. Of course, the Policeman that held Floyd down with his knee has been tried and found guilty by the media and their fellow anarchists. Anarchists do not believe in the concept of "innocent until proven guilty by a jury of his peers in a COURT OF LAW." Anarchists, whether in the media or on the streets, are no different from the lynching mobs that once conducted vigilante justice.

RayB said...

(continued)

Also, I find it amazing that these BLM/ANTIFA "protests" are taking place all over the world. Often, the protestors hold up their hands and shout "hands up, don't shoot." Where did that saying come from? Go back about 5 years and recall Michael Brown, aka "the Gentile Giant" and Ferguson, Maryland. (Early on, George Floyd was also referred to in the media as a "Gentle Giant").

Not long after being FILMED committing a strong arm robbery, Michael Brown and his "friend" were stopped by a squad car because they fit the description of the suspects. Michael Brown's "friend" had claimed that "his friend, Michael Brown, had his hands up, with his back to the Cop while shouting "hands up, don't shoot" when the Cop opened fire, shooting Brown in the back, killing him "like a dog." It NEVER happened. What REALLY happened was this; Michael Brown, aka, the Gentle Giant, forcefully reached into the squad car and attempted to wrestle the officer's gun away from him, whereby shots were fired. When Brown retreated, the officer exited the squad car and ordered Brown "on the ground." Instead, Brown charged the officer and was LEGALY shot by the officer.

Not only did sworn, eyewitness testimony completely refute the "friend's" narrative, the forensic autopsy did as well. Doesn't matter. This fake, lying scam continues to be used in all of the "protests," and continues to be referenced to as if it were factual by the fake media.

Back to George Floyd. Candace Owens concludes that Floyd was a "career criminal," and refuses to "honor" his life. I think she is right. Did the Minneapolis police make mistakes? Probably. But the Court process should be allowed to play out in order to determine what really happened.

BTW, the narrative that "police kill unarmed Blacks literally on a daily basis in America" is completely false. According to FBI statistics, in all of 2019, only 9 "unarmed" Blacks were killed by Police. Of those 9, 7 attempted an act of violence against the Police which justified their lethal force response. During that same year, 19 "unarmed" Whites were killed by Police.

Anonymous said...

What is it with these people always trying to grapple a gun away from a policeman (or armed citizen)? When was the last time you did that? It'd be a death wish.
Here, let me go wrestle that lion to get his paws under control.

Candace Owens will be skewered by 'her people' for what she says anyway. Much like Cosby years ago getting blasted for merely telling black kids to buy books instead of $300 Nike Air sneakers.

Sickening lawlessness.


Anonymous said...

GEORGE SOROS FUNDED VIOLENT PROTEST MOVEMENT IN FERGUSON, MISSOURI AND PAID BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTESTERS, TOO!!!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/freindly-reminder-soros-funded-violent-ferguson-protest-movement-paid-black-lives-matter-protesters/


GEORGE SOROS SPENT $33 MILLION BANKROLLING THE FERGUSON, MISSOURI DEMONSTRATORS

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2913625/Billionaire-George-Soros-spent-33MILLION-bankrolling-Ferguson-demonstrators-create-echo-chamber-drive-national-protests.html


Anonymous said...

Candace Owens is a very intelligent, well spoken true American hero! Love her!

The left would love to knock her off! Criminal bastards that they are?

Anonymous said...

Is the drug addict criminal buried yet? How long is this funeral going on?

Anonymous said...

"You're 100% Full of $hit, F**k You" - Chicago Alderman & Mayor Rage Over Looting On Leaked Audio

Probably a political ploy, but nice to see the demonrats fight amongst themselves

http://www.zerohedge.com/political/youre-100-full-hit-fk-you-chicago-alderman-mayor-rage-over-looting-leaked-audio

Anonymous said...

4:08 PM

Re: "Is the drug addict criminal buried yet? How long is this funeral going on?"

__________________________________________________________________________________________


Probably at least until every police department in the United States is dismantled and defunded... along with FREE healthcare for every black person in America!!! (And, let's see what else can we demand?)

Their running theme to white people seems to be: "It's not enough . . . "



Anonymous said...

My friend, Mike (who, by the way, is a registered Democrat) has lived in Buffalo, NY all of his life. He and I have known each other since we were teenagers.

He had this to say when I sent him the link to the Daily Mail article (below)...

________________________________________________________________________________________


"If you watch that video in slow motion, he definitely has his cell phone in his right hand and waves it in front of both cops. He is up to something. On talk radio and in conversations, everyone is siding with the police. Now, the city is trying to figure out what to do since all 57 highly trained riot officers have resigned. The black Mayor of Buffalo is siding with the cops."

Mike

________________________________________________________________________________________


Trump pushes conspiracy theory that the 75-year-old man pushed to ground by Buffalo cops was 'an ANTIFA provocateur' trying to 'scan police communications'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8402729/Donald-Trump-trumpets-bizarre-conspiracy-theory-75-year-old-man-Buffalo-cops-pushed-ground.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ico=taboola_feed


Anonymous said...

Buffalo PD shoving incident was staged and scripted . . .

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/gyblq8/the_buffalo_pd_shoving_incident_was_staged/

Anonymous said...

Yeah, it's never enough, is it?

Many Americans might not realize it, but that old, famous Rolling Stones song "Sympathy for the Devil" is actually about the Bolshevik Revolution. It's a musical adaption of the Russian novel "The Master and Margarite", a drama set in the early days of the Soviet Union wherein the Devil is running around Moscow tricking otherwise "atheist" Russians into Faustian deals and bargains. This is why the song deals mainly w/ Russian themes like the Czar's assassination, Anastasia and the Romanovs, the German Blitzkrieg, etc. The song even begins with beating jungle drums, echoing the "rule of the jungle" typical of Bolshevik rule. During the Cold War, Russian involvement was quietly suspected in the Kennedy assassinations referenced in the song too (e.g., Lee Harvey Oswald's Russian emigration and wife, Abraham Zapruder the Ukrainian Jew, the enigmatic Russian "Babushka" Lady, Russian-backed Cubans), but I won't go down that rabbit hole here.

What I did want to highlight is the famous line about how "every cop is a criminal, every sinner is a saint" -- this too was a favorite Bolshevik technique, and it seems very apropos today. You literally couldn't pick a bigger or more absurd-looking sinner than Fentanyl Floyd to turn into a martyr and a "saint" -- and yet that's exactly how they're treating him now, by carting his dead body around the country so people can "kneel" at the coffin and weep.

RayB said...


Candace Owens gives the unadulterated facts on George Floyd ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fij8TP0FE00

Remember this; one of the goals of totalitarians is to brainwash you, so that, in spite of what is obvious and is right in front of your eyes, you will deny what you are seeing because you have put your trust in the all powerful, well meaning State that would never lie to you.

That's what Orwell was trying to tell us in "1984," as declared by the Ministry of Truth:

War Is Peace

Freedom Is Slavery

Ignorance Is Strength

Anonymous said...

Sooner or later, the TRUTH always comes out . . .

NARRATIVE COLLAPSE: “Old man” who was “shoved” by police was actually a left-wing AGITATOR skimming police radio frequencies to run information warfare tactics against law enforcement

In this slow motion video, you will see Gugino using a phone as a capture scanner. You might have heard the term “skimming”; it’s essentially the same. Watch him use his right hand to first scan the mic of officer one (top left of chest). Then Gugino moves his hand to the communications belt of the second officer. WATCH CLOSELY:

Video . . .

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-06-09-all-staged-old-man-shoved-by-police-skimming-police-radio-frequencies.html

____________________________________________________________________________________________


Buffalo PD shoving incident was staged . . .

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/gyblq8/the_buffalo_pd_shoving_incident_was_staged/


Ruth of Exeter said...

"He" is Coming. There is a Facebook page of this name that purports to be Christian but is using chaos talk. And then I found this cheesy anthem. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MRXKZ1U79Q ... Maitreya Jesus? Trying again in 2020? You have taught us what to look for, Constance - thank you.

Tim Allan said...

Oh goodness, that last song was a Mormon offering! Still, I rest my case!

Anonymous said...

London Mayor Khan Sets Up Commission To Review All Landmarks To Ensure They Comply With "Diversity"

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/london-mayor-khan-sets-commission-review-all-landmarks-ensure-they-comply-diversity

Anonymous said...

Chinese Propaganda Outlet Paid Millions To Washington Post, Wall Street Journal

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/chinese-propaganda-outlet-paid-millions-washington-post-wall-street-journal

Anonymous said...

HBO Removes "Gone With the Wind" Erasing First Black Woman To Win An Oscar

...because racism!

https://zerohedge.com/political/hbo-removes-gone-wind-erasing-first-black-woman-win-oscar

Anonymous said...

'London Mayor Khan Sets Up Commission To Review All Landmarks To Ensure They Comply With "Diversity"'

But what of the stabbing sprees in his great city, practiced predominantly by non-whites?

If they built the Pyramids like they claim, and that Romans and Greeks stole from them (books of ancient Nigerian aerospace techniques!), then they can fix their own problems.


LEAVE WHITES ALONE

Anonymous said...

A gold-plated coffin!

Will Floyd's family fight to divide the $$$$ they will receive after this? You know a feature film is coming! sing it now: *we're in the money, we're in the money*

Which White suburb will they buy a mansion in later?

The mind boggles!

Anonymous said...

Money Laundering: Global Donations To BlackLivesMatter.com Funneled to DNC

https://www.infowars.com/money-laundering-global-donations-to-blacklivesmatter-com-funneled-to-dn


Anonymous said...

Rick 'Mr. No Rapture' Wiles is now blaming Israeli cops for the knee neck tactic.
Is there ever any time he doesn't blame the Jews for our problems?

Anonymous said...

"Rick 'Mr. No Rapture' Wiles is now blaming Israeli cops for the knee neck tactic.
Is there ever any time he doesn't blame the Jews for our problems?"

Sick isn't it?
RayB's kinda guy...

Anonymous said...

After George Floyd was released from a Texas prison, he moved to Minneapolis to start a new life!!!

George Floyd moved to Minneapolis in 2014 for a fresh start after being released from prison in Houston, Texas following an arrest for aggravated robbery

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8366533/George-Floyd-moved-Minneapolis-start-new-life-released-prison-Texas.html



paul said...

Did anyone ever say or even think that black lives don't matter? No. Certainly no one of any consequence.
Black Lives Matter is a psy-op. The name itself is a nasty suggestion that many people don't believe that black lives matter, and that just isn't true. It wasn't even true in 1967 and 1968, and it isn't true now.
So many things are just as Orwell said they'd be, where names of organizations are just the opposite of what they sound like.
Hence "Planned Parenthood" is an organization that destroys parenthood and family.
The Department of Homeland Security is a big government bureaucracy that insures that no one in this homeland will ever feel secure again.
The World Health Organization now seems to be in the virus spreading business, and the mass sterilization business.
The Department of Education is in fact the Department of Misinformation.
"No Child Left Behind" actually means No Child is actually educated, but gifted children are held back.
LGBT groups which ostensibly seek equal justice and rights for sodomi...er, sexual perver... er, freaks, whatever, are actually seeking superior powers over the general populous. They already have every right afforded Americans in general. They actually seek Special privileges, obviously.

Systemic Racism in the police forces simply does not exist, no matter how many times they repeat the phrase.
Black people who are murdered by cops amount to 2 to 3% of all the black people who are murdered every year in America. The other 97% of blacks murdered are murdered by other blacks in street crime. This is a known fact.
Why are there no rallies to end black-on-black violence?
Many times more whites are killed by cops than there are blacks killed by cops.

Anonymous at 4:01 pm above,
I completely agree with you that Candace Owens is brilliant. She is amazing and very courageous, and I'd add that so is Larry Elder, and Thomas Sowell, and Senator Tim Scott, and Lawrence Jones, and Ben Carson, and Dinesh D'souza and Coleman Hughes and David Webb, and Sheriff David Clarke, among plenty of others.

Bless the Lord, y'all. Bless His holy name. Let his praise be continually on our lips.
We enter in to his gates with thanksgiving and into his courts with praise.
His mercy endures forever.

Anonymous said...

Bill Gates spending $1.6 billion to pressure people to get coronavirus vaccinations . . .

https://www.lifenews.com/2020/06/05/bill-gates-spending-1-6-billion-to-pressure-people-to-get-corponavirus-vaccinations/


Anonymous said...

The populace (rather than the populous).

Anonymous said...

"Did anyone ever say or even think that black lives don't matter? No."

Black LIES matter, however.

Let's be honest here. They have some sort of father figure problem in their 'communities', with very, very rare exceptions. I get that they were destroyed in the 60's by Decomposrat welfare programs, but it seems everywhere in the world, even Europe, they cause problems. On the other hand, many Whites have deteriorated in morals, intellect, taste, etc. What is the answer?

Anonymous said...

God had the "answer" when he confouded their language at the tower of Babel. However He knew from the beginning that there would be a homogenization push in the last days! Multiculturalism. This will worsen until Christ returns.

Anonymous said...

I notice a definite trend here by a few to evolve this blogspot into a pro-White-oriented blogspot.

No thank you.

While there are certainly just concerns regarding BLM as well as discrimation against people of non-color(?) we don't need to go overboard either.

All humans are in the same boat in regards to Salvation, regardless of skin color.

Anonymous said...

dicrimination against ('people of non-color'?)...

Lol, my little joke. Is that an 'accepted' term is the reason for the question mark. If one group can be people of color then it would seem that people of non-color would be the alternative!

I say this as a person of non-color.

Anonymous said...

"All humans are in the same boat in regards to Salvation, regardless of skin color."

There is no trend to turn this into a pro-White blog area. Whoever you are, you better notice that Caucasians are under increasing assault in our nations, in every way and from every angle (Christians, too). While I agree we are here to have conversations about God and salvation, let's not be naive to think that there are no differences between people. God made the nations (and borders) and here we have forces trying to turn this upside down, using various races against the majorities in the West.

Anonymous said...

"There is no trend to turn this into a pro-White blog area."

My bad! Thanks for correcting me!

Oh wait...

"But what of the stabbing sprees in his great city, practiced predominantly by non-whites?

"If they built the Pyramids like they claim, and that Romans and Greeks stole from them (books of ancient Nigerian aerospace techniques!), then they can fix their own problems.

"LEAVE WHITES ALONE"
_ _ _ _

"Which White suburb will they buy a mansion in later?

"The mind boggles!"
_ _ _ _

"Let's be honest...it seems everywhere in the world, even Europe, they cause problems. On the other hand, many Whites have deteriorated in morals, intellect, taste, etc."

Ruth of Exeter, UK said...

Temple of Understanding getting excited.https://templeofunderstanding.org/this-is-our-time-and-vision-of-hope-by-alison-van-dyk-executive-director/

Anonymous said...

How could this possibly be happening to the city of Seattle, Washington?

Trump says 'domestic terrorists' and 'ugly anarchists' have overrun Seattle and tells 'radical left Democrats' to 'take back their city NOW, or I will' - as protesters set up armed checkpoints at six-block 'autonomous zone'

- Trump blasted Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan and Washington Governor Jay Inslee on Wednesday

- Demonstrators have taken control of a six-block area of downtown Seattle and are manning barricades

- There are reports of armed patrols demanding ID to enter the 'Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone'

- Demonstrators say they will maintain control of the 'CHAZ' until the Seattle police are disbanded

- Reports emerge that rapper Raz Simone has established himself as a 'warlord' within the CHAZ

- Inslee pleaded ignorance about the situation at a press conference saying he hadn't heard about it

- On Tuesday night, 300 protesters stormed Seattle City Hall carrying Black Lives Matter banners

- Group was led by City Councilmember Kshama Sawant who unlocked the building and led them inside

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8409067/Trump-says-domestic-terrorists-taken-Seattle-demands-CHAZ-retaken.html

_________________________________________________________________________

Seattle's Autonomous Zone warlord creates private police force . . .

https://www.infowars.com/seattle-autonomous-zone-warlord-creates-private-police-force-gets-dubbed-black-george-zimmerman/

________________________________________________________________________________________

A look inside Seattle’s newly-formed ‘Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone’

https://mynorthwest.com/1934076/seattle-capitol-hill-autonomous-zone/

Anonymous said...

Folks, be sure to get more of 9:15's profound wisdom by getting yourself a subscription to his new daily newsletter:

'Uncouth Slimeball Speaks!'

RayB said...


Just a few thoughts regarding the "race" issue ...

One thing that always galled me was the "Black on Black" crime movement. On more than one occasion, I have said "why not just be against CRIME ... period" because the clear message is this; "if you are going to commit crime, do it against a White person, not a Black." We don't hear a whole lot about "Black on Black" anymore. Perhaps even they have recognized the intense absurdity of the message.

Regarding "Black Lives Matter." I agree with Paul; "Did anyone ever say or even think that black lives don't matter? No. Certainly no one of any consequence."

The vast majority of violent crimes committed against White people are committed by Black criminals.

Do those "White Lives Matter" any less?

Back to the Black Lives Matter movement. Did you know that it was "founded" by three radical, feminist/lesbian Marxists? Did you know that it has received funding not only from George Soros, but by a number of American Corporations?

Bill Gates, the Vaccinator in Chief, states: "I am committed to listening and learning more about SYSTEMIC RACISM and what I can do with my actions and words to help create a more * equal and just future."

NOTE: Egalitarianism was the main mantra of the secular, Masonic "French Revolution." If you didn't comply with the "Citizen Revolutionaries on their take regarding complete EQUALITY of ALL CITIZENS, you lost your head." However, as Orwell rightly declared in Animal Farm, "All animals are equal, it's just that some are more equal than others." The fake philosophy of Egalitarianism is also the foundation upon which Marxism is built. After 100 MILLION + murdered victims, how did that all work out?

Gates' support came as hundreds of Microsoft employees signed a petition calling on company bosses to support Black Lives Matter and cancel police contracts. NOTE: Blacks are GOOD, Police are ALL BAD. Microsoft employees are Marxist wannabes just like their Founder.

Anonymous said...

"My bad! Thanks for correcting me!"

Why, you're most welcome!

RayB said...

The Marxist Media continues to fan the flames of "Whites are RACISTS with privilege, Blacks are OPPRESSED by "systemic racism." Lack of education, ambition, etc. has nothing to do with the rampant lack of accomplishments for countless Blacks in America. All failure in the Black community is deemed to be because of White people. Many also dangerously believe that "whites are just out to get them ... for no reason." Case in point, Ahmaud Arbery.

The media has portrayed Arbery as an innocent "jogger" that was "gunned down" while enjoying a "jog through a white neighborhood." They never used the word "alleged" in describing the crime, but rather, they conclusively used the term "murder," while identifying the "murderers" as two Georgian white men (aka, white supremacists).

What really happened appears to be this:

Arbery was not "jogging," but WALKING through a neighborhood that had experienced a rash of burglaries in recent months. In a video, Arbery is shown walking down the street and then entering a HOME that was currently being rehabbed. This same property had recently lost over $2,500 due to theft. Arbery had "visited" the inside of this home on several previous occasions prior to the day of the shooting. Arbery is shown on several videos "looking around" (after the thefts, the owner installed a security cameras).

RayB said...

(continued)

On the day of the shooting, Arbery is shown exiting the property through the attached garage and walking to the rear of the property's exterior. A neighbor, directly across the street, while holding a phone and calling 911, is seen yelling at Arbery ... probably "what are you doing?, etc." Arbery immediately responds by RUNNING away from the property ... down the street, aka, the "jog." The two suspects, a retired, 30 year veteran Cop and his son jump into their pickup truck in order to "head off" Arbery and detain him by using a LEGAL Citizen's Arrest. They call the police prior to attempting to attempting to stop Arbery.

The son, armed with a LEGAL shotgun is standing outside the truck to Arbery's left as he approaches the vehicle. Arbery is shown running to the RIGHT of the truck. When he gets to the front of the truck, he makes an abrupt left and ATTACKS the son. Arbery is clearly seen attempting to wrestle the shotgun away. During his attempt, the gun fires and hits Arbery in the hand, but, amazingly, he continues to struggle for the gun. As the struggle over the gun continues, the son fires the fatal shot that kills Arbery.

Here is the crux of all of this; the reason the two suspects were not originally charged is that they were operating within the confines of the law. However, activists groups, the media, politicians, even sports figures, etc. all put immense pressure on the "system" to arrest and prosecute these two "murderers." In their collective minds, the only thing left was for them to find a rope and a tree.

RayB said...

(continued)

Here is where things are REALLY going to get dicey ...

Based on the evidence that the public has been brainwashed to deny, no HONEST jury will vote to convict when sternly admonished to do so based upon "beyond a reasonable doubt." The Prosecution, no doubt, realizes that they have a very weak case, which usually means that they will attempt to salvage "something" by offering a deal, which the uninformed will absolutely hate.

If it goes to trial, and the evidence is BELIEVED by the jury, the two defendants will be acquitted.

In either of these scenarios, the reaction will be every bit as explosive and volatile as the George Floyd incident. (Speaking of which, the public has not been informed of all the details in that case either).

IMO, we are in the most dangerous of times, where literally anything can happen from this day forward. This is only my opinion, but, based upon the fact that the numerous, VIOLENT "protests" have been taking place in virtually every country in the West, this indicates that it is highly organized and that it is being organized and financed by an international entity.

Is this where the One World Government enters the stage in order to "restore peace" while promising to provide "financial security" for the oppressed masses?

Anonymous said...

RayB, thank you for sharing the TRUE story of what happened to Arbery, which of course we will never see covered by CNN (or any of the other 'alphabet soup' news networks).

Anonymous said...

”Anarchists, whether in the media or on the streets, are no different from the lynching mobs that once conducted vigilante justice.”

There are those who believe all men are created equal. Those who truly adhere to this notion do not adhere to hierarchy. They are, therefore, anarchists. This does not mean, however, that whilst one has equal rights one also has equal duties. That such equality can only be maintained by using just laws and judicial process to which all are equally held accountable in a fair and non-hierarchical manner.

Ray B.,
You are fond of the anarchist James Corbet's Report. Leo Tolstoy was an anarchist and a committed Christian.

Anonymous said...

Corrections and clarifications made to my post at 2:57 PM.

”Anarchists, whether in the media or on the streets, are no different from the lynching mobs that once conducted vigilante justice.”

There are those who believe all men are created equal. Those who truly adhere to this notion do not adhere to hierarchy. They are, therefore, anarchists. This does not mean, however, that whilst one has equal rights one does not also have equal duties. Between all men and women is the notion of equal value here, where equal rights are and must be balanced by equal duties so as to ensure such equal value is veridical. That such equality can only be maintained by using just laws and judicial process to which all are equally held accountable in a fair and non-hierarchical manner.

Ray B.,
You are fond of the anarchist James Corbet's Report. Leo Tolstoy was an anarchist and a committed Christian.

Craig said...

What in the world?!

Perhaps ol’ Johnny Rotten/Lydon was a prophet!

Public Image Ltd - Seattle (Official Video)


Don't like the look of this old town
What goes up must come down
Character is lost and found
On unfamiliar playing ground

Get out of My World
What in the world

Shoe boxed around the rifle range
Have all your functions rearranged
Your mind and body gagged and bound
On a new familiar playing ground
The ordinary will ignore
Whatever they cannot explain
As if nothing ever happened
And everything remained the same again

What in the world
What in the world
What in the world
Get out of my world
Get out of my world
Get out of my world

Open your mouth now

Secret sirens and knowing looks
these sunny days will cook the books
Happy to take the misery
This mortal life can bring to me
Don't like the look of this old town
What goes up must come down
Character is lost and found
On unfamiliar playing ground

What in the world
What in the world
What in the world
What in, get out, get out
Get out of my world
What in the world

Palaces, barricades, threats meet promises

RayB said...

Did you know that Black Lives Matter supports ABORTION, HOMOSEXUALITY and has an Anti-Traditional Family Agenda?


https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/did-you-know-black-lives-matter-supports-abortion-homosexuality-anti-family-agenda

Anonymous said...

BREAKING NEWS

Reuters

[Hollywood] A tremendous
firestorm of criticism erupted today when a new movie marketing campaign was rolled out this morning. The campaign was quickly branded "The WORST advertising ploy in history!". The ad campaign consists of people posing as 'protestors' going out to 'march' holding up big signs that feature a large photo of Will Smith & Tommy Lee Jones weating sunglasses above the words...

MEN IN BLACK

LIVES MATTER


(Coming Soon To A Theater Near You!)

paul said...

There is no political solution...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHOevX4DlGk

RayB said...

Group of grieving, George Floyd mourners, 200 strong, show up to "protest" at a Tampa, Florida Walmart:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/06/11/video-police-nearly-200-looters-steal-100000-worth-of-goods-from-tampa-walmart/

Anonymous said...

Huge wake up call for us all (plus there are two sources for this story) . . .


Killing for profit / undercover report from a battle tested nurse . . .

https://beforeitsnews.com/survival/2020/06/killing-for-profit-negligence-in-the-most-horrific-manner-the-covid-truth-undercover-coverage-from-a-battle-tested-nurse-2755426.htm

________________________________________________________________________________________


Whistleblower nurse says Covid-19 patients are being murdered . . .

Jon Rappoport breaks down the story of the whistleblower nurse, Erin Marie Olszewski, who exposed Covid-19 patients being purposefully murdered to boost numbers.

https://banned.video/watch?id=5ee17271c7a607002f0d14f1


Anonymous said...

"Is this where the One World Government enters the stage in order to "restore peace" while promising to provide "financial security" for the oppressed masses?"

No. The death of a silly black yob will not usher in the final government. It'd have to be a nuclear conflagration involving Israel, in my view. The rabbinical messiah is supposed to enter the scene then.

Anonymous said...

The planned 60GHz millimeter wave attack on schools / first cases of post installation 5g poisoning.

Many of us have read reports in the alternative media that 5g has been installed in schools all over the U.S. during the recent lockdown... although none of us want to believe that this is actually happening.
__________________________________________________________________________

The first video at the link below reports a 'mysterious illness' at Dewey High School in Dewey, Oklahoma.

Students, who recently attended classes there, have reported symptoms of everything from 'having trouble walking and talking'... to being 'paralyzed with seizures'.

Tests for both mold and water in the schools have turned up nothing.

Absent any type of medical diagnosis... a new label of 'conversion disorder' (a mental condition) has been used to describe what these children are experiencing.

The second video is a discussion about what is going on in schools in Huntington Beach, California.

Under the pretext of 'upgrading the air conditioning system' (for example)... electromagnetic weaponry has recently being installed in these schools' WiFi access points during the recent lockdown.

https://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2020/06/the-2nd-wave-the-planned-60ghz-millimeter-wave-attack-in-schools-1st-cases-of-post-installation-5g-poisoning-2511944.html

____________________________________________________________________________

The message should be crystal clear for parents all over this country... don't wait until September, when your children return to school, to take action against what is obviously happening!!! In other words, would you be willing to ignore or dismiss these reports at the RISK of possibly causing permanent harm to your own children???

What is going to happen if parents don't wake up and take control of this situation to protect their children is this... when your children complain of respiratory symptoms, they will be 'tested' and immediately placed under quarantine (as this will be blamed on Covid-19). Your children will then be forced to take medications and vaccines. If hospitalized, they will be placed on a ventilator which will kill them, not cure them (just as what has been happening to elderly people over the past 3 months)... because, the ventilator treatment does further irrepairable damage to the lungs.

It's time to wake up, folks... to this great DECEPTION!!!

Meanwhile, let's fall down our knees and pray... asking Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ to have mercy on us all... and to please save our country before it is too late.

Anonymous said...

Is Everything Going On Right Now Tied To The UN's Agenda 21 & Agenda 2030?

Must see interview with Debbie Bacigalupi . . .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1032&v=8YmrkieFOoI&feature=emb_title

RayB said...

Anonymous 9:07 AM ...

The Vatican has fully supported UN Agenda 21 & 30. That should put your mind at ease, because the Papacy would
never support anything that is bad ... right?

Watch Dr. Taylor Marshall (a Catholic) in this informative video give the details of what's behind Agenda 21 & 30:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIe5CW9LEO4

PS: don't be fooled for one second that this globalist trend began, and, will end, with Pope Francis. IMO, the next Pope will make Francis look like a capitalist that loved populism.

Anonymous said...

RayB, the problem with you is simple: You obviously did not have a good
Catholic education!

Anonymous said...

RayB:

Anyone who would be so ignorant as to attempt to make the UNITED NATIONS Agenda 21 & 30 all 'ABOUT' any pope... is a person who evidently didn't receive 'a good education.' You are giving Pope Francis way too much power.

Anonymous said...

The "21" in Agenda 21 refers to the original target year of 2021 where they were hoping to achieve their development goals by then. It has been affirmed and had a few modifications at subsequent UN conferences. Since it found 2021 was an overly optimistic date, its new timeline is targeting 2030. Its aim is to achieve global sustainable development. One major objective of the Agenda 21 initiative is that every local government should draw its own local Agenda 21. Since 2015, Sustainable Development Goals are included in the newer Agenda 2030.

Anonymous said...

Thank you, Anonymous @ 11:43.

I wonder where Pope Francis comes into the picture here? Maybe he's going to resign as Pope and run for office and become the next Mayor of Minneapolis!!! LOL

RayB said...

Anon stated @ 11:24 AM ...

"Anyone who would be so ignorant as to attempt to make the UNITED NATIONS Agenda 21 & 30 all 'ABOUT' any pope... is a person who evidently didn't receive 'a good education.' You are giving Pope Francis way too much power."

NOTE: I never stated that Agenda 21 & 30 is "all 'about' any pope," but nice try at deflection.

As for being "ignorant," I guess that you would include Dr. Taylor Marshall in that category, which means that you are so much better educated than him. By the way, it is Dr. Marshall that is making the case regarding the VATICAN's connection to and promotion of Agenda 21 & 30. WATCH THE VIDEO.

As to giving the Papacy "way too much power," the last I checked there are 1.2 BILLION Catholics in the world. The Papacy, as the leader of the Ecumenical movement, is the driving force behind bringing the "Religions" of the world together. Whenever they meet, they meet in Rome, and the Pope is the obvious head of this Christ denying group. The Papacy also enjoys coverage, overwhelmingly favorable, throughout the world's media. There is seldom a day that goes by where there isn't media coverage regarding the Papacy. A few years back, Pope Francis addressed the Assembly at the UN, whereby he fully endorsed Agenda 30. If that isn't power, I don't know what is.

Tell me, who is it that has more UNIVERSAL influence than that of a sitting Pope?

Anonymous said...

Would a pope embrace the Noahidic 'faith'?

Anonymous said...

Well, I happen to be one of those 1.2 BILLION Catholics... and Pope Francis certainly does not influence me (or any of my Catholic friends or relatives)... when it comes to the separation of church and politics. You are making a huge mistake when you make assumptions and lump all Catholics together... to fit your uneducated pre-conceived ideas. ((Dr. Taylor Marshall's opinion on a 'Vatican connection' has absolutely no influence on me whatsoever... although I realize that well-known Catholic-bashers on this blog eat this stuff up!)

When you make slanderous statements and LIES that we Catholics are a 'Christ-denying group'... that actually places YOU in the 'anti-Christ category' of not being a true Christian (within your heart and soul)... but, GOD will be your final judge (not me).

Catholic-bashers on this blog need to spend less time being over-the-top OBSESSED with hating Catholics... and more time worrying about their OWN immortal souls!!!

Craig said...

Looking Forward to the Past

Anonymous said...

Exactly, hate the hierarchy, not the victims in the church of Rome.

RayB said...

Anonymous @ 1:58 PM said (in part)

NOTE: this is what this Anon CLAIMS I said:

"When you make slanderous statements and LIES that we Catholics are a 'Christ-denying group'.."

NOTE: this is what I CLEARLY said, referring to the ECUMENICAL MOVEMENT, which makes the RELIGIONS of the world, which of course, DENY CHRIST !

"The Papacy, as the leader of the Ecumenical movement, is the driving force behind bringing the "Religions" of the world together. Whenever they meet, they meet in Rome, and the Pope is the obvious head of this Christ denying group."

NOTE: I have also been accused AGAIN of "hating Catholics." I absolutely do not. What I confess to hating is "every false way" that attempts to replace Jesus Christ as the ONLY "way, the truth, and the life," which is exactly what the Roman Catholic hierarchy has done.

Anonymous said...

Those who hate can not love. If you can not love, you are not a true Christian... period.




Anonymous said...

"All the top 5 pharmaceutical companies working on a COVID vaccine are using aborted baby cell lines in their research and all of them are funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation."

https://spiritdaily.org/blog/news/gates-funding-vaccine-companies-that-use-body-parts

Anonymous said...

Jesus 'Declared He's God Of Old Testament'

Author: Christ's divinity clearly revealed in original Aramaic


By Joe Kovacs
WND - Exclusive

An American pastor and author who has produced his own translation of the New Testament based on the Aramaic text claims Jesus openly declared numerous times that He is the Creator God of the OLD Testament.

Aramaic is the ancient language believed by many scholars to be the language Jesus Himself mainly spoke in the first century, as depicted in Mel Gibson's popular 2004 film, "The Passion of the Christ."

"With all the Aramaic references to the name of the Deity," says Rev. David Bauscher of Cambridge. N.Y., "the [Aramaic] New Testament not only teaches that Yeshua (Jesus) is divine, but it names Him as the Lord Jehovah of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, who created Heaven and Earth, appeared to Abraham and appeared and gave the Law to Moses on Mount Sinai, and it so names Him over 80 times."

His latest work is titled, "The Aramaic New Testament in Plain English," with details provided at his website, AramaicNT.com.

Bauscher is a former high-school science teacher proficient in Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic, and has been teaching the Bible since 1976. He is also the father of 12 homeschooled children.

He admits most Bible scholars believe the original New Testament was written in Greek, or almost all books were initially written in Greek.

But Bauscher contends there's more evidence indicating the 27 books comprising the New Testament were actually written in Aramaic before they were translated into Greek, as is thought by many Assyrian and Syrian Christians.

"I was convinced, after two years of intensive research, that the complete Peshitta New Testament (as embodied in the 1905 Syriac Peshitta New Testament edition) was the original inspired text delivered to the apostles and evangelists, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John," he told WND.

The name "Peshitta" in Aramaic means "straight" – in other words, the original and pure New Testament.

"The American people at least deserve to read a direct English translation of the original Aramaic words of Jesus and the apostles into English, as opposed to all the translations from Greek, which I have demonstrated is itself a translation of the Aramaic original," said Bauscher.

"We also deserve to know that the original was not Greek, but Aramaic, should we desire to study the original language and text for ourselves, not to mention that we deserve a rightly educated clergy, who know the historical and cultural realities of first-century Israel and the original Scriptures. There is widespread misinformation and false propaganda being disseminated in Christian churches concerning this matter."

Anonymous said...

Though translations of from the Aramaic text have been done before, one major difference is Bauscher's rendering of a key phrase that he says points to the divine identity of Jesus.

While many versions from the Greek have Jesus simply saying, "I am," Bauscher has published it from the Aramaic to read, "I am the Living God."

For example, his version of Mark 14:61-64 reads as follows, using the original name Yeshua to refer to Jesus:

But he was silent, and he did not answer him anything. And again, The High Priest asked him and said, "Are you The Messiah, The Son of The Blessed One?"

But Yeshua said to him, "I AM THE LIVING GOD, and you shall behold The Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power and coming on the clouds of Heaven."

But The High Priest ripped his tunic and he said, "Why now do we need witnesses?"

"Behold, you have heard the blasphemy from his own mouth. How does it appear to you?" But they all judged that he deserved death.

Another example of Jesus stating He is, in fact, God, is found in the 18th chapter of the Gospel of John, where the apostle Judas, referred to as Yehuda in this translation, helps Jesus get arrested:

And the famous first words from John are rendered as: "In the origin The Word had been existing and That Word had been existing with God and That Word was himself God."

The New King James Version of John 1:1 states it as: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."

Jesus is also referred to as God and not just the Son of God in other translations of the Bible based upon the Greek.

For instance, Hebrews 1:8, speaking of God the Father, indicates: "But about the Son he says, "Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever; a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom."


https://www.wnd.com/2013/07/jesus-declared-hes-god-of-old-testament

Anonymous said...

Does the New Covenant command Sabbath keeping? Click Here!

Anonymous said...

Anonymous Berkeley Professor Shreds BLM injustice Narrative

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/anonymous-berkeley-professor-shreds-blm-injustice-narrative-damning-stats-and-logic

RayB said...


Anonymous said to RayB @ 10:54 PM:

"Those who hate can not love. If you can not love, you are not a true Christian... period."

NOTE: if a person does not HATE falsehood, he/she cannot, and does not, LOVE the truth. In fact, if you don't LOVE the truth, God will send a spirit of delusion upon you:

2nd. Thessalonians 2: 10-12

10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

David expresses his hatred for God's ENEMIES:

Psalm 139

20 For they speak against thee wickedly, and thine enemies take thy name in vain.

21 Do not I hate them, O Lord, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee?

22 I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies.

23 Search me, O God, and know my heart: try me, and know my thoughts:

24 And see if there be any wicked way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting.

RayB said...

Pope Francis clearly states the Vatican's position .... THEY HATE THE TRUTH. WATCH as Francis clearly declares that all the FALSE religions of the world worship the same "god" as does Christianity !

This is nothing other than a clear cut rejection of Jesus Christ as Lord of Lords, and King of Kings. It also declares that there are "many ways" to God other than through Christ alone. See John 14:6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vI0tiN88ldE

Anonymous said...

RayB,

Speaking the truth will always draw the real haters to you. And they will declare you to be the hateful one. Isn't that what we have in the U.S. right now? Hang in there brother!

Craig said...

Anon 9:15 AM,

I read through the entirety of the “open letter”, and though I can agree with many of the author’s points (from my own perspective of things), I’m not convinced of its purported origins. Wouldn’t the self-description as “UC Berkeley History Professor” effectively reveal the author? Given the gravity expressed in this letter, it’s curious to me that this letter was made public. Wouldn’t the recipients understand the ramifications of doing so?

Bottom line: I’m not sure what to make of it.

Maybe I’m missing something?

Craig said...

Anon 8:40/41 AM,

I briefly viewed the website the Text

See the following from their About Us tab: “The AHAV Bible Project is headed by Baruch Ben Daniel (Baruch) and his wife Adele; along with a team of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, Bible students and scholars.” It fails to mention any members of this “team”.

Quoting Baruch from the WND article: "We also deserve to know that the original was not Greek, but Aramaic, should we desire to study the original language and text for ourselves, not to mention that we deserve a rightly educated clergy, who know the historical and cultural realities of first-century Israel and the original Scriptures. There is widespread misinformation and false propaganda being disseminated in Christian churches concerning this matter."

Though the author/s may well be sincere, he/they are asserting their position based on suppositions rather than known facts and evidence. On the surface, this does not necessarily mean they are, in fact, wrong. But with no evidence to back up their claim and much evidence to the contrary via the plethora of GREEK New Testament manuscripts, I’m unconvinced. The burden of proof is on them to prove that Aramaic is indeed the original language.

Now, I do agree with him on the importance to “know the historical and cultural realities of first-century Israel”; however, there are some excellent commentaries and other works that do just that.

And we don’t need Baruch’s AHAV to know Jesus declared Himself the Creator God of the OT. The Greek NT does this well enough.

As an aside, Brian Simmons bases his dubious Passion “translation” on this same assertion that the Aramaic is the original language, and, further, that he himself was divinely inspired to “translate” this to (NAR theology) English. Now, it’s not my intent to equate this “translation” with the AHAV above. However, in both cases we must first agree with the basic premise that the Aramaic is the “original” New Testament. I reject that premise.

Anonymous said...

As an Anonymous Black Astronaut Rock Star I think that anytime you read something without knowing WHO actually wrote it you have to question the authenticity of the author (and their motives). I mean...the shock value of any clear thoughts coming from a purportedly black male in the UC Berkeley history department has to beg the question whether it's real at all or more republican propaganda. Mix a little truth with a little "you're not a racist, black people are racists" and then blame it all on the democrats (while ignoring the millions of [most minority] babies killed by the republican party since it founded Roe v Wade in 1972)

Craig said...

I mean...the shock value of any clear thoughts coming from a purportedly black male in the UC Berkeley history department has to beg the question whether it's real at all or more republican propaganda.

Or more Democrat propaganda. Or globalist propaganda.

Anonymous said...

should have said "clear conservative thought" instead of "any clear thought" as though a black man/history professor is incapable of "any clear thought" (not what I meant). As a moderate, I don't disagree with some of the author's discussion regarding the craziness and Marxist underpinnings of blm, I'm just highly suspect that it actually came from a black male professor at UC Berkeley, even if it was confirmed to be sent to black history professors at other colleges.

I wish it were true and I'd be more prone to believe it if it didn't blame the entire downfall of humanity on the democratic party (when clearly both parties are complicit and play their respective parts).

ALSO - the whole nurse Erin Olszewski supposedly exposing a conspiracy at Elmhurst hospital in New York is also fake. Just another covid grifter trying to get famous and/or make money.

https://zdoggmd.com/elmhurst-hospital/

https://zdoggmd.com/undercover-nurse/

RayB said...

To Anon @ 10:07 AM ...

Thank you. You are so right. Anyone and everyone that stands for the truth as found in Christ and His Word will ALWAYS be the subject of hate and scorn. There is no reason to "marvel" at this, because Christ Himself informed us that this very thing would happen to us.

This is the identical spirit that hated, tortured and murdered "heretics" who remained faithful to Christ and steadfastly denied the Papacy's claim of authority over the souls of men. For 1,000 years, the Papacy ruled the Catholic Monarchies of Europe by proxy, which in turn carried out executions against Rome's enemies.

History is about to repeat itself. Once Satan's One World Religion is firmly established, with the Pope as its Serpent Head, along with the secular One World Government, that same evil, despotic, murderous religious rule will begin again.

If you want to know the future, study the past. "Can a leopard change its spots?" In spite of all its well planned propaganda that they very effectively use to deceive, they remain the enemy of Christ, of His Word, and his people.

Anonymous said...

There appears to be only one single black male professor in the history department at UC Berkeley.

https://history.berkeley.edu/people/faculty

It's certainly not him. He's a proponent of black activism and fighting for civil rights and change. He wrote a book about the black panther movement and here's a quote from a podcast.

Waldo Martin: "I think Denise has already mentioned some of this material, some of this stuff. But to me, Black Lives Matter. The whole idea of trying to get us to think through sort of the, for me, unimaginable sort of horror of the everyday surveillance of just being black. Black while driving, black while shopping, black while stepping out of my house."

https://news.berkeley.edu/2020/02/07/berkeley-talks-podcast-transcript-denise-herd-waldo-martin/

RayB said...

I don't want to give the false impression that the enemies of Christ are found only in the RCC. They are EVERYWHERE, including so-called "Bible Believing Churches." Here is just one example:

Awhile back, I was asked by a member of one such church, what I thought about her "Pastor." I asked her if she really wanted to know my opinion and she replied "yes." I then said that "based upon some personal experiences and observations over the years, I did not hold him in high regard" to which she was quite surprised and disappointed. I didn't elaborate very much, but basically stated that this man was a "friend of the world and a compromiser" of God's Word, and gave her several illustrations. When I said this, which was the truth, her opinion of me seemed to have dropped considerably. What a surprise !

Several years later, this very same church went through a split. The reason? The "pastor" had been making favorable references to "gays" from the pulpit. It got to the point where it began to be a controversy among church members. The Board of Elders were pressured to sit down with the pastor, whereby, they presented him with a position paper, drafted by them, that stated "Marriage is limited to and between one MAN and one WOMAN." When the pastor was asked to sign the document, the pastor refused. To their shock, he then stated that he believed that God "sanctions all LOVE, and that members of the same sex that LOVE each other should be allowed to marry each other and "enjoy the blessings and support of their church." Upon that, the Elders demanded his immediate resignation. The pastor left, taking over 50% of the members with him in order to form another "church." His "church" regularly marches for "Gay Pride," and has been very active in promoting the gay agenda.

I know one particular woman that belongs to this "church" and regularly attends services ... in fact she is a "greeter." She recently left her husband (and two children) in order to move in with her "boyfriend." Her two children soon followed the mother's example by moving in with those that they were dating. Such is the fruit of a wicked tree !

One more thing; about 25 years ago, a well known pastor/author came to town. I received a phone call from the event organizer, whom I knew, asking me if I would be interested in taking this man to dinner and then drive him to the event. Of course my wife and I jumped at the chance. During our dinner conversation, we very much "clicked. " At one point, my wife excused her self, and he then told me that he "travels all over the country and to Europe, etc. giving talks." He said "you can't imagine in your wildest dreams the abdominal state that the churches are in." He also said that he "didn't know how or why they find me," but that he has had contact "with many high up members of the Federal Government, including US Senators, members of the intelligence community, etc. ... they often just appear at my door and then proceed to tell me about the REAL state of our country. They are ALL very worried." Remember, this was 25 years ago ... he then said, based upon what he was being told by these people, "if we continue on our current path, we are going to lose our country."

With all of the events taking place recently, what this man "confidentially" said to me that night has taken on even more meaning for me.


Anonymous said...

I am a conservative, traditional Catholic baptized and raised in the same Catholic Church that my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ created in the year 33 AD (before He was crucified and died for the sins of ALL mankind!!!)... when He said the following words (as He made Peter the very first Pope): "And I say to you, that thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall NOT prevail against it" (Matthew 16-18).

And... because HE IS GOD, of course Jesus knew full well that there would be forces at work less than 2,000 years later who would ATTEMPT (but never succeed!!!) in destroying HIS Church. We conservative, traditional Catholics recognize that Pope Francis may be one of those 'forces.' Does that mean that I am going to 'abandon' my Catholic faith? NO, absolutely not... when I have the PROMISE of my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ that 'the gates of Hell shall NOT prevail against it.'

In the year 2033, the Catholic Church will be 2,000 years old. It could never have lasted this long, if Jesus had not INTENDED for His Church to last this long!!! Therefore, NO POPE (Francis or anyone else!!!) has the 'power' to destroy the Catholic Church created by Jesus Christ.

As Constance Cumbey has brought out many times over the past nearly 40 years, ALL of the churches have been deeply infiltrated within their ranks and HIERARCHY by the New Age Movement: Catholic, Jewish, Protestant.

For ANY of you on this blog to be so delusional as to hold YOUR particular church up as the 'exception' to what is currently happening in the world would be almost laughable... if it weren't so tragic. (People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, etc.)

Many of us Catholics have become fed up with the constant, obsessive vitriol directed against Catholics on this blog... over the past 15 years. (Catholics don't go around bashing all of the Protestant sects, which are also heavily infiltrated with New Age forces). Every once in awhile, one of us feels an obligation to speak out.

It's important to remember that the New Agers love to see this deep division / infighting play out on blogs... Protestant Evangelicals against Catholics and Jews.

Meanwhile, you Protestant Evangelicals need to remember one thing... that the New Agers are currently using you (as 'a means to an end') and saving you to be persecuted LAST... since the Globalist's One World Religion has plans to destroy ALL of the 'old age' traditional religions!!!

In the end, we may ALL be facing certain martyrdom!!! So, it's time to concentrate on preparing our OWN souls... rather than waste time fighting on a blog. In other words, our time on this earth may soon be running out.



Craig said...

Chris Rock makes an excellent point regarding the “a few bad apples” defense for police brutality (just the first 2:30 will suffice):

Chris Rock Debunks “Bad Apples” Argument ft. Ben Burgis

But the ‘bad apple defense’ is doubly bad. I’m old enough to remember a very young Michael Jackson singing the sugary-pop song “One Bad Apple”: one bad apple don’t spoil the whole bunch, girl. Yet, the point of the song was to debunk the truism that one bad apple CAN, in fact, spoil the bunch!

Having stating all the above, I don’t think it fair to collectivize the entire police force as bad. But some areas sure need some serious reform. And it isn't just brutality against blacks. Someone sent me a clip of a black officer--who was standing with a white officer--goading an old white guy to hit him, giving him explicit permission to do so. The man initially objected, but then tapped the black officer on the face, after which the officer threw him to the ground and arrested him. This was caught on body-cam of another officer who was about 20 feet away. The man (and the one standing with him?) was, rightfully, prosecuted.

Anonymous said...

And, by the way . . .

If St. Peter was going to be the FIRST person I was going to meet on the day when I cross over to the other side... I sure wouldn't want to do anything to piss him off. LOL

Anonymous said...

The New Age Movement LOVES Pope Francis. The last three Pope's, at least, are ALL IN!

Anonymous said...

The New Age Movement LOVES all of YOU arrogant 'cafeteria christians' who, while constantly preaching the 'word of God', continue to betray Him by selecting only those passages of the bible you like... and discarding the rest, while referring to your more 'modern' New Age versions of the bible.

News flash: The TRUTH has no 'versions'... Jesus didn't speak in riddles. He said exactly what He meant and He meant exactly what He said.





Anonymous said...

Who is the Rock on which Jesus said He would build His Church?

Share with others:

Taking Matthew 16:13-19 as their supporting text, Catholics claim that Peter is the first pope of the Catholic Church because Jesus says to Peter,

That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

Catholics believe this passage establishes both Peter as the head of the Catholic Church and the Catholic Church as the one with final say on salvation issues.
...
This interpretation, however, is not Biblical. There has been much scholarly debate regarding to whom Jesus refers to as the rock in Matthew 16:18. While Peter’s name in Greek is petros which means "rock"--or actually, a small, movable stone--Jesus switches to Petra when he says, “and upon this Rock I will build my church” (emphasis added). Petros is a masculine noun, whereas Petra is feminine and refers to bedrock or an immovable foundation.ii Jesus thus makes a play-on-words between Peter [the Pebble] and He, Himself [the Bedrock] that establishes His Church. Theologian Loraine Boettner writes that Jesus’ words translate as, “You are Petros, and upon this petra I will build my church.”iii A change of gender indicates a change of subject.

So if the rock isn't Peter, who is it?

Scriptures make it clear that the rock is Christ. There are approximately 34 instances of Christ being referred to as a rock in the New Testament, including the following:

Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints, and of the household of God; And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone (Ephesians 2:19-20, emphasis added).

Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ (1 Corinthians 10:1-4, emphasis added).

For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ (1 Corinthians 3:11).


https://amazingdiscoveries.org/who-is-the-rock-on-which-jesus-said-he-would-build-his-church#!

Anonymous said...

Your are going to have a hard time explaining your SLANDER to Jesus and Peter.

They will both straighten YOU out real quick.

Good luck, 3:00 PM. You are going to need it!!!

Anonymous said...

Woah to the arrogant 'cafeteria christians' who make the deliberate and sinful decision to twist and distort the words of Jesus!!!

Anonymous said...

The New Agers are so PROUD of you, Anonymous at 3:00 PM. Tell me, are they paying you, or are you doing this for free?

Anonymous said...

You don't have to continue posting your LIES and attempt to explain your DECEPTION to me, Anonymous @ 3:00 PM. There is a much higher power who you are going to have to do all of your explaining to!!! You probably don't even realize just how arrogant you really are... that you think that Jesus, the Son of GOD, would need a translator. LOL


(Meanwhile, I am just eating my popcorn... and sticking around for the entertainment.)

Anonymous said...

Anonymous @ 3:00 PM

Wow, I notice that you are quoting from amazingdiscoveries.org

Isn't that a well-known New Age website (meant to deliberately confuse Christians)?

And here you are posting on an ANTI-New Age website.

So, are you a New Age provocateur? Or, are you a troll?


Anonymous said...

Looks like Anon 3:00 PM really touched a nerve!

Anonymous said...

Actually, it looks more like a few Catholics may have torn Anon 3:00 PM a new one.

RayB said...

I feel compelled to state the following, and that is, in virtually every single reference to a "rock" in the Old Testament as well as the New, "rock" refers to "God," the "Word of God," and to "Jesus Christ" (the Word and Jesus Christ is one and the same).

You will not find a single instance where the Bible refers to a MAN as the "rock," and that includes Peter. The single reference that the RCC builds their entire case on for Peter being the first Pope is built upon this verse that is taken out of context. Aside from that, clearly the Lord Jesus Christ is declared to be the "head of the church," and NOT Peter.

Furthermore, it is a fact that prior to the establishment of the ROMAN PAPACY, via the "Bishop of Rome" in the 7th. Century, the name "Roman Catholic Church" did NOT EVEN EXIST ! The organization of churches throughout the known world was simply known as "The Church." Roman, Pagan influence began in earnest under the Roman Emperor Constantine in the 4th. Century. Constantine melded the Paganism of Rome with his version of "Christianity." He did so in an attempt to appease both Pagans and "Christians" that lived within the Roman Empire. This is precisely why the RCC has so many beliefs and practices that can be traced back to Paganism and Babylon.

Anonymous said...

Was Peter The First Pope?
- - - - -
What is the New Age movement and how does it relate to our lives?

Anonymous said...

Now, RayB also thinks that Jesus, the Son of GOD needs a translator.

Jesus did not speak in 'riddles'... He very clearly said what He meant, and He meant what He said.

And he certainly did not need arrogant people like YOU to DARE to translate His words for Him... not to mention to completely misrepresent Him.

Your couldn't be more wrong... so, your lengthy post is a complete waste of time.



Craig said...

RayB,

You wrote: You will not find a single instance where the Bible refers to a MAN as the "rock," and that includes Peter.

You speak from ignorance.

The word translated "Peter" is the Greek petros. This word is found over 150 times in the NT (not including the title of the relevant epistles). Though I've not checked every occurrence, those I have refer to Peter. Some of these times the word is, indeed, prefaced with the Greek article ("the"), though not specifically in Matthew 16:18.

Now, as far as I'm aware, there are no other occurrences in which petros (masculine) and petra (feminine) are in the same context like here. And there are only 14 instances of petra in the entire NT, and not all refer to Jesus (e.g. Matt 27:51, 60). There are, however, other synonymous words for "stone" or "foundation" that refer to Jesus.

Having said the foregoing, the issues surrounding the grammar/syntax of Matthew 16:18 are not straightforward. But there is obviously some sort of word play here. Of importance also is the word most versions translate "Church". That word is ekklēsia

Anonymous said...

I'll say it again ONE more time: The TRUTH has no 'versions'!!!

There is only the TRUTH (which you obviously refuse to face)... or you wouldn't be constantly searching for 'versions'.

You Protestant Evangelicals are being deceived... and I think that, deep down, you probably already know that.



RayB said...


Anonymous said @ 5:26 PM:

"Now, RayB also thinks that Jesus, the Son of GOD needs a translator.

Jesus did not speak in 'riddles'... He very clearly said what He meant, and He meant what He said.

And he certainly did not need arrogant people like YOU to DARE to translate His words for Him... not to mention to completely misrepresent Him.

Your couldn't be more wrong... so, your lengthy post is a complete waste of time."

NOTE: Roman Catholic translation of the passage insists that Peter is the ROCK (and not Christ) upon which His church is built.

YET, somehow they don't apply their same translating technique to the following:

"But he turned, and SAID UNTO PETER, GET THEE BEHIND ME SATAN: THOU ART AN OFFENSE UNTO ME: FOR THOU SAVOURIST NOT THE THING THAT BE OF GOD, BUT OF THOSE THAT BE OF MEN." Matthew 16:23

NOTE: if you use the same translating technique (out of context) that the RCC uses, Jesus just named Peter SATAN !

Of course, Peter is neither Satan or the ROCK.

Craig said...

Anon 5:53 PM (and etc.),

What does Augustine—a recognized “Doctor” by the RCC—say as regards Matthew 16:18?

And I tell you...‘You are Peter, Rocky, and on this rock I shall build my Church, and the gates of the underworld will not conquer her. To you shall I give the keys of the kingdom. Whatever you bind on earth shall also be bound in heaven; whatever you loose on earth shall also be loosed in heaven’ (Mt 16:15-19). In Peter, Rocky, we see our attention drawn to the rock. Now the apostle Paul says about the former people, ‘They drank from the spiritual rock that was following them; but the rock was Christ’ (1 Cor 10:4). So this disciple is called Rocky from the rock, like Christian from Christ...Why have I wanted to make this little introduction? In order to suggest to you that in Peter the Church is to be recognized. Christ, you see, built his Church not on a man but on Peter’s confession. What is Peter’s confession? ‘You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.’ There’s the rock for you, there’s the foundation, there’s where the Church has been built, which the gates of the underworld cannot conquer (John Rotelle, Ed., The Works of Saint Augustine (New Rochelle: New City Press, 1993), Sermons, Vol. 6, Sermon 229P.1, p. 327).

As noted above, in the Biblical text in Matthew 16:18 “rock” is two different words: sy ei Petros, kai epi tautȩ̄ tȩ̄ petra̧ =~ You are Peter/petros, and upon this [the] petra…. There is a distinction in the major Greek-English lexicons between these words, with the former an individual rock/stone, the latter a fixed rock/bedrock. Note that petros is NOT preceded by the Greek article, while petra IS. Thus, this, I think, is likely an example of paronomasia (double meaning/pun), in which Peter is both “a rock” and “Petros”/Peter, the name given to him (see Matt 4:18, 8:14; 10:2, etc.). Also, Christ is petra in 1 Cor. 10:4.

More from Augustine:

And this Church, symbolized in its generality, was personified in the Apostle Peter, on account of the primacy of his apostleship. For, as regards his proper personality, he was by nature one man, by grace one Christian, by still more abounding grace one, and yet also, the first apostle; but when it was said to him, ‘I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth, shall be bound in heaven; and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth, shall be loosed in heaven,’ he represented the universal Church, which in this world is shaken by divers temptations, that come upon it like torrents of rain, floods and tempests, and falleth not, because it is founded upon a rock (petra), from which Peter received his name. For petra (rock) is not derived from Peter, but Peter from petra; just as Christ is not called so from the Christian, but the Christian from Christ. For on this very account the Lord said, ‘On this rock will I build my Church,’ because Peter had said, ‘Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.’ On this rock, therefore, He said, which thou hast confessed, I will build my Church. For the Rock (Petra) was Christ; and on this foundation was Peter himself built. For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Christ Jesus. The Church, therefore, which is founded in Christ received from Him the keys of the kingdom of heaven in the person of Peter, that is to say, the power of binding and loosing sins. For what the Church is essentially in Christ, such representatively is Peter in the rock (petra); and in this representation Christ is to be understood as the Rock, Peter as the Church (Philip Schaff, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1956), Volume VII, St. Augustin, On the Gospel of John, Tractate 124.5).


[cont]

Craig said...

[cont]

Here is a portion of Eusebius of Caesarea’s commentary on the Psalms:

‘And he sent out arrows, and scattered them; he flashed forth lightnings, and routed them. Then the channels of the sea were seen, and the foundations of the world were laid bear, at thy rebuke, O Lord, at the blast of thy nostrils’ (Ps. 18.14)...By ‘the foundations of the world,’ we shall understand the strength of God’s wisdom, by which, first, the order of the universe was established, and then, the world itself was founded—a world which will not be shaken. Yet you will not in any way err from the scope of the truth if you suppose that ‘the world’ is actually the Church of God, and that its ‘foundation’ is in the first place, that unspeakably solid rock on which it is founded, as Scripture says: ‘Upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it’; and elsewhere: ‘The rock, moreover, was Christ.’ For, as the Apostle [Peter] indicates with these words: ‘No other foundation can anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Christ Jesus.’ Then, too, after the Savior himself, you may rightly judge the foundations of the Church to be the words of the prophets and apostles, in accordance with the statement of the Apostle: ‘Built upon the foundation of the apostles and the prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone.’ These foundations of the world have been laid bare because the enemies of God, who once darkened the eyes of our mind, lest we gaze upon divine things, have been routed and put to flight—scattered by the arrows sent from God and put to flight by the rebuke of the Lord and by the blast from his nostrils. As a result, having been saved from these enemies and having received the use of our eyes, we have seen the channels of the sea and have looked upon the foundations of the world. This has happened in our lifetime in many parts of the world (Commentary on the Psalms, M.P.G., Vol. 23, Col. 173, 176).

Now, as regards petra in Matthew 16:18, the three possible interpretations are:

(1) The RCC view, though Augustine and Eusebius of Caesarea (“the Father of Church History” per the Catholic-oriented site New Advent) do not agree. Moreover, Tertullian and Origen do not adhere to this view. If one were to attempt to counter that the latter two were considered “heretics” by the RCC, this would fall prey to the genetic fallacy—just because a source is deemed wrong in one area does not mean the source is always wrong.

(2) That Peter’s confession is the 2nd “rock” (petra), the view of Augustine, e.g.

(3) That Christ is the 2nd “rock” (petra).

To take one verse, ONE VERSE, and create an entire doctrine out of it, a doctrine that is not supported by any other Scripture, and is contradicted by early “Church Fathers”, seems perilous to me. Even if it can be unequivocally proven that there’s been a succession of bishops at Rome after Peter, this still does not prove that the bishop of Rome was recognized as the “Pope” of the Church from the beginning. The way I see it, the papacy has been anachronistically retrofitted.

Anonymous said...

Jesus Christ Himself will tell every single one of you on Judgement day that HE created the Catholic Church in the year 33 AD (before He was crucified and died for the sins of ALL mankind)... and that there has been an unbroken line of Popes from the year 33 AD up through the present time (which is historical FACT). It will be up to Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as to how He judges Pope Francis. It is certainly not going to be up to any of you.

Since God gave each and every one of us a free will... you can choose to either accept or deny this TRUTH.

None of this is going to hurt ME... only yourselves.

(So, please stop wasting your breath... or, keystrokes with your lengthy posts.)

Craig said...

Anon 7:02 PM,

Apparently Augustine and Eusebius disagree with you and the RCC. I assume you are aware that the former is considered a "Doctor of the Church", while the latter is considered "the Father of Church History". Yet, by their very words above, they disagree with the RCC doctrine of the papacy. How can that be?

Anonymous said...

Craig:

First of all, Augustine didn't become a convert to the Catholic Church until the age of 31.

Later, he became known as 'a Doctor of the Church' and 'ONE of the Fathers of Christianity'... but, he was never called 'the Father of Church 'HISTORY'.

Actually, I have read his extensive writings, and I disagree with much of his philosophy.

Ultimately, I am not responsible for any person who either agrees or disagrees with the Church. I mean... what does that have to do with ME? It has absolutely no influence on my beliefs whatsoever.

Any opinions of Augustine or Eusebius do not CHANGE the words spoken by Jesus in 33 AD.

Anonymous said...

IF Peter was the first leader of the church (IF), there was no pope for another 300 years. In the book of Acts it is evident that James is leading the apostles when he has the final word on their discussion. Peter is subordinate.

The churches around the empire were autonomous. There was no central leadership. There was no 1 leader. There was no leader until Rome declared Christianity legal and established a system to administer the religion. At some point in the late 4th or early 5th century one of the Bishops of Rome declared himself the universal bishop. So we go from the 1st century to the 4th with no pope.

The catholic organization claims that all the bishops of Rome after Peter were popes. It can’t be proven that Peter ever was in Rome. No subsequent bishops of Rome were popes until 300+ years later.

https://www.quora.com/How-can-the-Catholic-Church-claim-an-unbroken-line-of-popes-when-at-times-there-were-as-many-as-three-rival-popes?share=1

Anonymous said...

AN “UNBROKEN CHAIN” OF PAPAL SUCCESSION?

In 2013, the Vatican Information Service announced: “Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio, S. J., has been elected as Supreme Pontiff, the 265th successor of Peter.”

The belief that Jesus started the Catholic church is based on apostolic succession – that a succession of Popes have descended from apostle Peter to the current Pope.

Catholics believe all other churches cannot even be called ‘churches’ in the proper sense because they do not have this. But the idea that Peter was “the first pope” from whom a dynasty of popes emerged has no support in the Bible.

In the absence of Biblical evidence, Catholic apologists clutch at early church history, employing tricks to make it validate their position.

In a debate between Dave Hunt and Karl Keating titled, “Was the Early Church Catholic?” Mr Keating quoted some patristic works to support apostolic succession and papal primacy, but his quotes were out of context. Here are two examples:

He said: “Clement, the 4th bishop of Rome, writing to the Corinthians in the year 96 said: ‘Our apostles appointed those who had already been mentioned and afterwards added the further provision that if they were to die, other approved men should succeed in their ministry.”

This quote was taken from 1 Clement 44 but he omitted a sentence:

“Our apostles also knew, through our Lord Jesus Christ, and there would be strife on account of the office of the episcopate. For this reason, therefore, inasmuch as they had obtained a perfect fore-knowledge of this, they appointed those [ministers] already mentioned, and afterwards gave instructions, that when these should fall asleep, other approved men should succeed them in their ministry.”

Notice that plural appointed ministers were referred to here. The “office of the episcopate” refers to bishops or overseers (Gr: episcopois) which is synonymous with elders (Gr: presbuterous). See Acts 14:23, 20:17, 28, Titus 1:5-7, Phil. 1:1, 1 Pet. 5:1-5.

Karl Keating also quoted Irenaeus:

“It is necessary to obey those as we have shown have succession from the apostles, those who have received with the succession of the episcopate…”

This was taken from his work, Against Heresies:

“It is necessary to obey the presbyters who are in the church – those who, as I have shown, possess the succession from the Apostles. For those presbyters, together with the succession of bishops…” (3:3:1)

Again, the source refers to presbyters/elders, not a pope. Both citations do not support his claims.

This is one of the shortcomings of oral debates – a person can easily sway the audience with misquotes, rhetoric or body language. In a written debate, such slyness will not work.

This is not a matter of being an erudite scholar. You can be a genius of all time, but if facts and truth are not on your side, you can be defeated by an infant who knows the truth.

Why apostolic succession is false

It is based on false assumptions. Catholics who try to make a case for apostolic succession have a whole set of unproven axioms which colour their view of Scripture and history.

Anonymous said...

These Catholics:

a) assume Peter resided in Rome. If 1 Pet. 5:13 proves he was in Rome, then 1 Cor. 1:12, 9:5 would also prove he was in Corinth. Neither passages prove he was resident in Rome.

b) assume Peter was the bishop of Rome. An apostle is a “sent one” and it differs from the office of a bishop.

Being an apostle is analogous to being a prophet; it’s a calling, not an office. That Peter was an apostle doesn’t automatically make him a bishop.

c) assume Peter was the first bishop of Rome who started the church of Rome.

The early Roman churches (note the plural) were house churches made up of Jewish or Gentile members or both (Rom. 16:5, Acts 18:2). Peter didn’t start the church of Rome.

d) assume Peter was the “only” bishop of Rome. This is refuted by the fact that New Testament church leadership was pluralistic, not monarchical. A plurality of bishops (pastor/elders) presided over a local church.

Whenever Catholics come across the word “bishop” in patristic works, they read their own idea of a monarchical prelacy into it, whereas the idea of a single bishop presiding over a plurality of churches wasn’t the early model.

e) assume Peter ordained a successor. He didn’t. Even if he ordained a candidate, that would make him a pastor, not a pope. Popes are elected, not ordained.

If the apostles appointed pastors or elders, that doesn’t really make them successors. Ordination entails a succession in teaching, not a succession in authority.

Take note also, that while Mathias was chosen to replace Judas, no one was chosen to replace James (Acts 12:1).

The belief is hinged on doubtful sources.

Irenaeus’ listings of bishops is said to be the “list of popes” who succeeded Peter. He listed Linus, Anacletus, Clement, Evaristus, Alexander, Sixtus, Telesphorus, Hyginus, Pius, Anicetus, Soter and Eleutherius (Against Heresies 3:3:4).

First of all, the term “pope” or “papa” was generally used for all bishops from the third century. It wasn’t until 1079 AD that the title was reserved for the bishop of Rome, so it’s anachronistic to use this list as a proof of papal succession.

Second, Irenaeus places Paul and Peter together as bishops without saying anything about the primacy of Peter. This list was compiled by Hegesippus and there was a reason it was presented:

“The first claim to a succession from the apostles in support of particular doctrines was made in the second century by the Gnostics … Hegesippus, an opponent of Gnosticism, compiled a list of bishops in Rome (Eusebius, H. F. 4.22.5f). Irenaeus of Lyons drew on the idea of the succession of bishops to formulate an orthodox response to the Gnostic claim of a secret tradition going back to the apostles” (Everett Ferguson, Encyclopedia of Early Christianity, 1999, pp. 94-95).

Ireneaus’ list contradicts that of Tertullian (Praescriptione, xxii) in which Clement comes after apostle Peter. Interestingly, the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia has this to say about “pope” Linus:

“We cannot be positive whether this identification of the pope as being the Linus mentioned in 2 Timothy 4:21 goes back to an ancient and reliable source, or originated later on account of the similarity of the name … The dates given in this catalogue, A.D. 56 until A.D. 67, are incorrect . Perhaps … Linus had held the position of head of the Roman community during the life of the Apostle … But this hypothesis has no historical foundation … The “Liber Pontificalis” asserts that Linus’ home was in Tuscany, and that his father’s name was Herculanus; but we cannot discover the origin of this assertion.”

Anonymous said...

The Vatican has published conflicting lists of popes from Peter which had to be revised. The earliest list is from the Liber Pontificalis (presumably first composed in the 6th century), yet even the New Catholic Encyclopedia says:

“But it must be frankly admitted that bias or deficiencies in the sources make it impossible to determine in certain cases whether the claimants were popes or antipopes” (1967, 1:632).

The ugly truth is, the Catholic “church” is yet to verify an accurate and complete list of the popes. The so-called “unbroken line of succession back to Peter” is pure fiction.

The nature of papal successions.

For apostolic succession to occur, each pope must choose his own successor and personally lay hands on him and ordain him.

This was how Paul and Barnabas were appointed before they were sent forth by the church at Antioch (Acts 13:3). Timothy’s appointment to the ministry was also by the elders laying hands on him (1 Tim. 4:14).

This biblical procedure is never followed with regard to successors of Catholic popes or bishops. Papal succession has most often followed ungodly procedures:

a) Many popes were installed by political intrigues.

During the Middle Ages, the papacy was owned by powerful families (e.g the Caetani, Conti, Orsini, Colonna etc). Pope Boniface VII, a Caetani, had to battle the Colonna to remain in power.

In 1303, he was seized by the emissaries of Philip the Fair of France and Rome fell into French possession. As a result, the papacy was moved to France, and from 1309-77, the popes were French and resided at Avignon.

“From the 4th to the 11th century, the influence of temporal rulers in papal elections reached its zenith. Not only the Roman emperors, but also, in their turn, the Ostrogoth kings … attempted to control the selection of Roman pontiff. This civil intervention ranged from the approval of elected candidates to the actual nomination of candidates (with tremendous pressure exerted on the electors to secure their acceptance) and even to the extreme of forcible deposition and imposition.” (Cath. Ency. 11:572b)

That pagan rulers rigged papal elections proved that the popes weren’t chosen by the Holy Spirit.

b) Many popes bought the papal seat.

Wealthy candidates bought their way to becoming pope (simony) or bribed their opponents to step down.

Pope Alexander VI (1492-1503) bought the papal throne with “villas, towns and abbeys …[and] four mule-loads of silver to his greatest rival, Cardinal Sforza, to induce him to step down” (Peter de Rosa, Vicars of Christ, 1988, 104).

The papal throne was so commercialized that John XII became pope at 16 and Benedict IX at 11, because their families were wealthy. As a Catholic historian notes, “the Apostolic throne … was now bought and sold like a piece of merchandise.”

When Benedict IX was tired of being pope and was eager to devote himself to his favourite lover, he sold the papacy for 1500 pounds of gold to his godfather, Giovanni Gratiano, who then became pope in 1054 under the name Gregory VI. Apostolic succession? No.

c) Many became popes through violence and murder.

Gregory of Tusculum, a powerful warlord, used the power of the sword to install 3 of his sons and a grandson (one succeeding the other) as popes.

When Pope Benedict IX fled his papal chair, John, bishop of the Sabine hills, entered Rome and installed himself as pope Sylvester III (1045). Then Benedict stormed back overpowered him and ruled again as pope (Dave Hunt, A Woman rides the Beast, 1994, 106).

It’s sheer mockery to call this “apostolic succession.”

In the 9th century, “popes scrambled onto the bloodstained [papal] throne, maintained themselves precariously for a few weeks – or even days – before being hurled themselves into their own graves” (E. R. Chamberlin, The Bad Popes, 1969, 21).

Anonymous said...

Pope Alexander V (1409-10) who was notably attended to by 300 females in his regal palace, was poisoned to death by Baldassare Cossa who then became Pope John XXIII.

At a point, there were 3 popes ruling over different portions of Rome which their private army controlled, until Emperor Henry III marched into Rome with his army and presided over a synod that deposed all three “popes” and installed Clement II, his own choice.

d) Papal succession has been influenced by sex.

Not less than 6 popes (e.g Pope Anastasius, Pope Lando etc.) were put in their offices by a mother-and-daughter pair of prostitutes. A historian notes that:

“The influence of two prostitutes, Marozia and Theodora, was founded on their wealth and beauty, their political and amorous intrigues. The most strenuous of their lovers were rewarded with the Roman mitre …The bastard son, the grandson, and the great grandson of Marozia – a rare genealogy – were seated in the Chair of St. Peter” (Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, 1830, xlix).

That harlots – Theodora and Marozia – determined who became pope disproves apostolic succession.

Marozia’s grandson, Octavian, also became John XII – a pope so obsessed with illicit sex that he was killed by a husband who caught him having sex with his wife!

The holy order quicksand

Only a valid priest can become a valid bishop and only a valid bishop can become a cardinal and then a valid pope. I use the word “valid” because there are certain conditions which can invalidate a person from receiving a lawful holy order.

The New Catholic Encyclopedia (7:89) states that “the lawful reception of Orders demands outstanding and habitual goodness of life, especially perfect chastity . Solid possession of this latter virtue is an indispensable condition of clerical vocation and its presence must be positively evident.”

How can a person’s “habitual goodness” be verified? Do the administers read the minds of the candidates? How can “perfect chastity” be “positively evident” in males (since females don’t become popes)? How do they prove male virginity? Can you see the quicksand here?

The person administering the holy orders must also meet up with certain conditions: “the sanctity and dignity of the sacrament [of holy orders] demands for lawful and worthy administration that the minister be in a state of grace, free of ecclesiastical penalties” (Ibid, 7:88a).

How many priests or bishops, from the medieval period to this present day, meet up to all these conditions? By Rome’s own standards, there is a high probability that they have been electing anti-popes!

When we also consider the fact that many popes were heretics, this automatically breaks the link in the apostolic succession chain.

And if just one papal link is “missing” – whether by dubious records, political, sexual or corrupt ascension to the papal seat – then the whole “unbroken chain of apostolic succession” becomes a grievous lie!

Why Rome’s apologists still defend this falsehood was summed up by Ignatius of Loyola:

“That we may be altogether of the same mind and in conformity with the Church herself, if she shall have defined anything to be black which to our eyes appears to be white, we ought in like manner pronounce it black” (Rules for Thinking with the Church, Rule 13).

In God’s kingdom, however, truth is more important, and only those who love and embrace the truth will be set free (John 8:32).

https://victorspen.wordpress.com/2016/02/17/an-unbroken-chain-of-papal-succession

Craig said...

Anon 9:57 PM,

You apparently misread my most recent comment. When I wrote “the former” I was referring to Augustine in the first sentence. When I wrote “the latter” I was referring to Eusebius. It is Eusebius who is called “the Father of Church History” (because of his Ecclesiatical History). It is Augustine who is considered a “Doctor”.

Though it is true Augustine did not “convert to Catholicism” until he was 31, prior to this he was Manichaean, which was of Gnostic origins. He did not write either works I referenced above while a Manichaean; he wrote them as a “Catholic”.

Any opinions of Augustine or Eusebius do not CHANGE the words spoken by Jesus in 33 AD.

If we assume the RCC doctrine of the papacy was in place at the time of both men, certainly neither Augustine nor Eusebius would have written their views regarding Matthew 16:18 without some sort of censure by the RCC.

More importantly, you are merely reasserting your claim. While you are certainly entitled to have your own opinion on this matter—to adhere to the teaching of Catholicism—this interpretation is merely that: an interpretation. This is one of at least three possible ones. To merely reassert your claim that these are “the words spoken by Jesus in 33 AD” does not deem your claim true. And by claiming these are Jesus’ words according your interpretation of them is to engage in circular reasoning: the claim is true because you say Jesus’ words mean what you say they mean.

No one is calling into question the content of Jesus’ words. I’ll even quote from the Douay-Rheims version: thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church. Or the NAB(RE): you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church. I absolutely affirm these translations are valid. These are Jesus’ words translated into English. But, to reiterate, I disagree with the RCC interpretation of them.

Anonymous said...

To Anonymous 10:29 PM

Re: "IF Peter was the first leader of the church (IF), there was no pope for another 300 years."

__________________________________________________________________________________________

You should really do your 'homework' before making such a STUPID statement.

There has been an UNBROKEN line of Popes, for a total of 266 popes, from Peter 33 AD to Pope Francis in the present time.

Here is the complete list, which is documented HISTORY. This is not an opinion, but an actual FACT!!! Here are the names of every single one of them . . .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_popes






Anonymous said...

And as for all the rest of you LOSERS...

You do realize that you are actually 'arguing' with Jesus Christ, don't you?

(I am trying not to laugh as I type this... but, all of your arguments are really pathetic.)

Please try to get some help for your 'obsession' with the Catholic Church.


~ Signing off for the night... I have had quite enough!!!



Anonymous said...

12:33 AM,OH KING OF CIRCULAR REASONING...

You said:

"There has been an UNBROKEN line of Popes, for a total of 266 popes, from Peter 33 AD to Pope Francis in the present time.

"Here is the complete list, which is documented HISTORY. This is not an opinion, but an actual FACT!!!"

You should really do your 'homework' before making such a STUPID statement.

https://victorspen.wordpress.com/2016/02/17/an-unbroken-chain-of-papal-succession

Anonymous said...

P.S. I apologize, I forgot we are arguing with Christ Himself!

How've you been by the way, Jesus?

Anonymous said...

P.P.S. Don't be afraid to get that mental help that you so desperately need. Tell your psychiatrist that you need to work on stopping your embracing of a very profound state of denial and go on from there.

Good luck to you!

Christine Erikson (aka Justina) said...

ungtoken chain of papal succession is IRRELEVANT. there are unbroken chains of patriarchal succession on ALL the patriarchates back to the apostles.

Constantine didn't do anything but mke Christianity legal and call the first ecumenical council to get them to settle the arian dispute. Most of wht you call pagaiztion has biblical basis.

Irenaeus said the faith must agree with Rome because all flowed into Rome, in other words, all the outlying churches shaped rome so rome would accurately in his day at least repreent the faith of all. Rome was a product not an origin.

https://amazingdiscoveries.org/AD-We-Believe amazing discoveris.org is not a new age site, probably there is one with a similar name. https://amazingdiscoveries.org/S-deception-Three_Angels_Messages_Revelation_Advent they support Ellen G. White the false prophet, so they are SDA.

""I believe Thomas and Christine are both examples of non-Christians that participate here."

And RayB."

I take issue with this. Thomas certainly is non Christian. RayB slipped up and displayed a serious heresy at one point, but mostly his problem is tunnel vision per his usual range of influence. I (Christine) am definitley a Christian, and attempt to fit everything into a biblical framework.

"Martin Gugino is a 75-year-old professional agitator and Antifa provocateur who brags on his blog about the number of times he can get arrested and escape prosecution. According to Buffalo Mayor Byron Brown “There has been vandalism, there have been fires set, there have been stores broken into & looted. According to what was reported to me, that individual was a key major instigator of people engaging in those activities.”

Mr. Gugino’s Twitter Account is also filled with anti-cop sentiment [SEE HERE]. Last Thursday Gugino traveled from his New York home in Amherst, to Buffalo where he was seen on camera agitating a protest crowd. One of the protesters earlier remarked that Mr. Gugino was “acting like an asshole”, and “trying to get punched in the face.”"
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/06/06/buffalo-officials-duped-by-professional-antifa-provocateur-arrest-and-charge-two-police-officers-righteous-police-team-stand-together-and-walk-out/

Christine Erikson (aka Justina) said...

oops reposted last week's post I hadn't deleted from the desktop

ungtoken chain of papal succession is IRRELEVANT. there are unbroken chains of patriarchal succession on ALL the patriarchates back to the apostles.

Constantine didn't do anything but mke Christianity legal and call the first ecumenical council to get them to settle the arian dispute. Most of wht you call pagaiztion has biblical basis.

Irenaeus said the faith must agree with Rome because all flowed into Rome, in other words, all the outlying churches shaped rome so rome would accurately in his day at least repreent the faith of all. Rome was a product not an origin.

https://amazingdiscoveries.org/AD-We-Believe amazing discoveris.org is not a new age site, probably there is one with a similar name. https://amazingdiscoveries.org/S-deception-Three_Angels_Messages_Revelation_Advent they support Ellen G. White the false prophet, so they are SDA.

""I believe Thomas and Christine are both examples of non-Christians that participate here."

And RayB."

I take issue with this. Thomas certainly is non Christian. RayB slipped up and displayed a serious heresy at one point, but mostly his problem is tunnel vision per his usual range of influence. I (Christine) am definitley a Christian, and attempt to fit everything into a biblical framework.

"Martin Gugino is a 75-year-old professional agitator and Antifa provocateur who brags on his blog about the number of times he can get arrested and escape prosecution. According to Buffalo Mayor Byron Brown “There has been vandalism, there have been fires set, there have been stores broken into & looted. According to what was reported to me, that individual was a key major instigator of people engaging in those activities.”

Mr. Gugino’s Twitter Account is also filled with anti-cop sentiment [SEE HERE]. Last Thursday Gugino traveled from his New York home in Amherst, to Buffalo where he was seen on camera agitating a protest crowd. One of the protesters earlier remarked that Mr. Gugino was “acting like an asshole”, and “trying to get punched in the face.”"
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/06/06/buffalo-officials-duped-by-professional-antifa-provocateur-arrest-and-charge-two-police-officers-righteous-police-team-stand-together-and-walk-out/

Anonymous said...

Finally, someone has been able to explain the connection between 5G and the Coronavirus

https://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2020/05/5g-whistleblower-coronavirus-test-spreading-virus-you-cannot-catch-the-coronavirus-unless-you-take-the-covid-19-test-or-covid-19-vaccines-exposing-the-covid-19-lie-great-videos-2511687.html

Anonymous said...

Much MORE on Martin Gugino, professional agitator from Amherst, NY (a suburb of Buffalo)...
___________________________________________________________________________________________

NARRATIVE COLLAPSE: That 'old man' who was shoved by police was actually a left-wing AGITATOR skimming police radio frequencies to run information warfare tactics against law enforcement

In this slow motion video, you will see Martin Gugino using a phone as a capture scanner. You might have heard the term 'skimming'... which is essentially the same. Watch him use his right hand to first scan the mic of officer #1. Then Gugino moves his hand to the communications belt of officer #2. WATCH CLOSELY:

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-06-09-all-staged-old-man-shoved-by-police-skimming-police-radio-frequencies.html

________________________________________________________________________________________


Buffalo PD Shoving Incident Was Staged!!!

Here is the UNEDITED video proof (including the use of fake blood)

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/gyblq8/the_buffalo_pd_shoving_incident_was_staged/

Anonymous said...

MUST SEE VIDEO...

These highly intelligent voices provide 'a breath of fresh air' perspective, from famous faces that we all recognize.

https://ifapray.org/blog/a-push-back-on-the-race-issue-from-faces-you-recognize/

Anonymous said...

"All the top 5 pharmaceutical companies working on a COVID vaccine are using aborted baby cell lines in their research and all of them are funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation."

https://spiritdaily.org/blog/news/gates-funding-vaccine-companies-that-use-body-parts

Anonymous said...

COLLAPSE of Democrat-run cities now imminent as TRUCKERS say they will refuse delivering to cities with de-funded police!!!

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-06-13-truckers-refuse-delivering-to-cities-with-de-funded-police.html


Anonymous said...

The Great Reset

https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/



Anonymous said...

Republic Of CHAZ Begins Reparations: White Participants Pressured To Give Blacks $10 Each

"White people, I see you. I see every one of you, and I remember your faces."

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/republic-chaz-begins-reparations-white-participamts-pressured-give-blacks-10-each

Anonymous said...

Already-Broke Colleges Being Bullied Into Hosting Costly "White Privilege" Workshops Amid Virus Crisis

https://www.zerohedge.com/already-broke-colleges-being-bullied-hosting-costly-wh ite-privilege-workshops-amid-virus

Anonymous said...

"It's Over, America:" Tulsa Police Major Says Cops Across Country On Verge Of Quitting

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/its-over-america-tulsa-police-major-says-cops-across-country-verge-quitting

Anonymous said...

60% Of People Naturally Resistant To SARS-COV2, New Study Reveals

https://www.zerohedge.com/health/60-people-naturally-resistant-sars-cov2-new-study-reveals

Anonymous said...

When the police in various large cities of America get so fed up that they resign in disgust, what's next for our country?

Will this bring about a 'crisis equals opportunity for a solution' scenario that brings UN troops to the streets of America???

Anonymous said...

Poll Shows Sweden's COVID-19 Strategy Remains Broadly Popular

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/poll-shows-swedens-covid-19-strategy-remains-broadly-popular

Anonymous said...

Of course 10:38 AM, that's exactly what I thought when I read, and then posted the link! The Lucifarians 'will' to destroy the old order, to bring in their NWO. Jehovah is allowing this now. Just flip the dollar bill to see the image of their god. The ONE. Perhaps the first 'seal' has been opened, and the second also? Does anyone else 'see' the conquering? How about the 'taking of peace from the earth'??

Craig said...

2020: The Year Of Fear

This began with the subtitle “A Fairy Tale; Or, A Tale Of Fairies”, but, though apt, I thought it too long.

The year of Our Lord 2020, the year where the highly educated and elites forgot all they knew about viruses, and treated a not unexpected, not usual pandemic as if were unique in all history, with no medical precedent.

Lo, the people believed the elites. And there was great fear.

The people said O, Government! Protect us! We have the right not to be sick! None were sick before like this.

And the government replied, We shall remove your liberties and hold back the baying forces of Nature, over which we have complete control.

The people said, “More!”

The people said, In all of history none suffered as greatly as we. We shall never return to normal. O, Government, please ensure this never happens again

The government replied, We shall restrict your movements and trace your comings and goings with greater vigilance forevermore

There arose certain brigands who riled the people. They said, Behold, this is not that bad. It has been much worse before. You misunderstand Nature. Your efforts are for little. Be not afraid!

The elites and highly educated formed patrols to hunt down the brigands.

The elites and highly educated ranged across the cyberland and purged and burned all traces of the brigands. They said, The people would be confused to hear the brigand message. It is better they listen only to us.

The people said, If we go outside early we shall die!

Then, since this is a fairytale, the brigands quit the land and ventured forth to form their own realm where cowardice, rank credentialism, and all manner of perversions against God were quashed.

And there was peace.

paul said...

Even if there were an apostolic succession, which I don't believe there is, it would most certainly be broken now with this enemy of God in the Vatican.

Anonymous said...

It looks like 5G will soon be everywhere (in the Internet of Things).

If what is being stated on this video is true, how can we ever protect ourselves and our families from escaping the dangers of 5G?


https://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2020/05/5g-whistleblower-coronavirus-test-spreading-virus-you-cannot-catch-the-coronavirus-unless-you-take-the-covid-19-test-or-covid-19-vaccines-exposing-the-covid-19-lie-great-videos-2511687.html

RayB said...

Former Assistant Director of the FBI's Counterterrorism Unit describes in detail what is REALLY behind Black Lives Matter, ANTIFA, Bill Ayers, Barack Obama and the Democratic Party. DON'T MISS THIS short, but VERY informative video ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mclt1UOPaWM

Anonymous said...

"COLLAPSE of Democrat-run cities now imminent as TRUCKERS say they will refuse delivering to cities with de-funded police!!!"

I would say to the Firemen and paramedics that they should leave if the police are thrown out. Suck on that.

RayB said...

One last thought regarding "Peter" being the first "pope," thereby establishing the "papacy" ...

Of all the books of the New Testament, God used Peter to write only TWO epistles; 1 &b 2 Peter. That's it. Paul, on the other hand was used of God to write 13 ... possibly 14 epistles. While Peter is SUPPOSED to be the "1st. pope," Paul sternly corrected Peter's error, publicly, as recorded in Galatians 2: 11-14. Why would Paul be correcting the "infallible pope" Peter on matters of doctrine?

Here is another; Peter (who is claimed to be the 1st. "Roman Catholic pope"), in his entire writings of his 2 Epistles, never ONCE mentions ANY doctrine or dogma that is PECULIAR to Roman Catholicism ! NOT A SINGLE ONE. Think about that.

Here's a brief list that Peter never even hints at in his ONLY Epistles, and yet, all of these are EXTREMELY important to the foundation of Roman Catholicism:

Mary's is NEVER mentioned, let alone venerated.

The creation of images and statues is never mentioned or implied.

Prayers to Mary for intercession is never mentioned or implied.

Prayers to the Dead is never mentioned or implied.

The RCC's claim of Mary's IMMACULATE CONCEPTION is never mentioned or implied.

The RCC's claim of Mary's ASSUMPTION into HEAVEN is never mentioned or implied.

RayB said...

(continued)

The RCC's title of Mary as the "Queen of Heaven" is never mentioned or implied.

The RCC's claim that Mary now "sits on the Throne of God next to her Son" is never mentioned or implied.

The RCC's claim of Mary's perpetual sinlessness is never mentioned or implied.

The office of the Priest is never mentioned or implied.

Confessions to a Priest, along with the Priest's power to 'forgive sins' ... never mentioned or implied.

THE SACRIFICE of the MASS is never mentioned or implied.

Changing the elements into the literal Flesh and Blood of Christ is never mentioned or implied.

The Seven Sacraments of the Catholic Church is never mentioned or implied.

The Papal office is never mentioned or implied.

Peter never claims or implies his supremacy over the rest of the Apostles.

Papal Infallibility is never mentioned or implied.

Peter never claims to have the "keys" to heaven and hell.

Peter never claims to be the "Vicar of Christ."

Peter never claims to be the ruler of "Heaven, Earth and Hell."

The ROSARY is never mentioned or implied.

INDULGENCES are never mentioned or implied.

MASSES for the Dead, along with prayers FOR the DEAD are never mentioned or implied.

PURGATORY is never mentioned or implied.

INFANT BAPTISM as a means of Regeneration is never mentioned or implied.

The MAGISTERIUM is never mentioned or implied.

The "College of Cardinals" is never mentioned or implied.

Peter never mentions that he has ever visited "Rome" in either Epistle.

"Mortal" and "Venial" sins are never mentioned or implied.

NOTE: remember, this is the "FIRST CATHOLIC POPE," yet, he NEVER mentions ANY peculiar Roman Catholic doctrine or dogma ! How could that possibly be the case? The answer is clear; Peter was neither "Catholic" nor was he ever a "pope."




Anonymous said...

Great and timely article at https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/05/how-the-jews-weaponzed-blacks.html dealing with the long time ripoff organized crime collaboration of Blacks and Jews in the major cities of America.

What the people don’t really know is how deep those organized crime ties truly are.

For example, why do you think U.S. Treasury Secretary and Super-Jew Steve Mnuchin doesn’t want to release where exactly all that $2.2 trillion dollars worth of COVID-19/CoronaVirus money loans went to?

That’s because New York State’s federal Small Business Administration ultra Jewish Zionist boss Beth Goldberg, and her Head Negro In Charge, NYC Small Business boss Gregg Bishop, literally awarded 99% of this money to her ultra-Zionist Jewish business cronies and fellow synagogue congregants, which then trickled down to the “Brothers” in Harlem through Gregg Bishop.

Non-Jews & Non-Blacks in New York, saw none of this money, and instead this was a huge cash bailout to the Jewish Mafia in New York City and then onwards to their Black “muscle” for their faithful loyal service.

This was the scam/con of the century, analogous to when Jewish mob boss Arnold Rothstein fixed the 1919 World Series. Great and timely article at https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/05/how-the-jews-weaponzed-blacks.html dealing with the long time ripoff organized crime collaboration of Blacks and Jews in the major cities of America.

What the people don’t really know is how deep those organized crime ties truly are.

For example, why do you think U.S. Treasury Secretary and Super-Jew Steve Mnuchin doesn’t want to release where exactly all that $2.2 trillion dollars worth of COVID-19/CoronaVirus money loans went to?

That’s because New York State’s federal Small Business Administration ultra Jewish Zionist boss Beth Goldberg, and her Head Black In Charge, NYC Small Business boss Gregg Bishop, literally awarded 99% of this money to her ultra-Zionist Jewish business cronies and fellow synagogue congregants, which then trickled down to the “Brothers” in Harlem through Gregg Bishop.

Non-Jews & Non-Blacks in New York saw none of this money, and instead, this was a huge cash bailout to the Jewish Mafia in New York City and then onwards to their Black “muscle” for their faithful loyal service.

This was the scam/con of the century, analogous to when Jewish mob boss Arnold Rothstein fixed the 1919 World Series.

---

It is a very well kept secret that New York City government is run by left-wing communist/socialist Jews and their “muscle,” the Blacks.

This mechanism of control exists at all levels and branches of NYC government, in its legislature, executive, and judicial branches, as well as in its police force and other socialist agencies run out of NYC Social Services.

The feds need to step in and investigate and stamp out this complete and total culture of corruption on racial and religious grounds, but they won’t, for fear of being called “anti-semitic” or “anti-black.”

But this is the height of racism, discrimination, and crony corruption – that all small business in NYC will fail, unless you are either a left-wing jew, black, or connected to/paying them off somehow.

Anonymous said...

To RayB:

Several of us Catholics have been posting on this blog (on and off) for the past 15 years.

Long before you crawled out from under your rock... in your weak attempt to play the game of 'gotcha' (which you are not very good at, by the way)... we Catholics have pointed out that we do NOT BELIEVE in Sola Sciptura.

Therefore, there is no 'debate' here. We just DISAGREE... period!!!

WHERE is it written ANYWHERE in the Bible that the teachings of Jesus come from scripture ALONE??? Absolutely nowhere!!!

We Catholics believe in Scripture PLUS Apostolic Tradition... based on the ORAL teachings of Jesus and his 12 Apostles (who have passed down their writings).

If you can't ACCEPT what we believe... then, that is YOUR problem... it's certainly not ours!!!

Please stop embarrassing yourself with your vitriol and obsession. It is not only very UN-Christian... but, it also makes you sound rather unstable.

If you insist on going on rant after rant on this blog... well, maybe you can ask your doctor if he has some 'medication' that you can take for that (and it will calm you down).

___________________________________________________________________________________________


The Danger of Sola Scriptura

https://bible.org/article/danger-sola-scriptura


Anonymous said...

Everyone attacks RayB the most!

I say, STAMP OUT RAYCISM!!! 😇

Anonymous said...

'Raycism'... I love it. Thank you for sharing, Anonymous @ 5:26 PM.

RayB said...

2 Timothy 3:16-17

"All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

"That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works."

Mark 7:9 "And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own TRADITION."

Mark 7:13 "MAKING THE WORD OF GOD OF NONE EFFECT THROUGH YOUR TRADITION, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye."

NOTE: when they have nothing else, they attack personally, i.e. "Long before you crawled out from under your rock ..." LOL


«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 400 of 536   Newer› Newest»