Monday, July 09, 2018

Javier Solana denied USA Visa -- Why?

I did a series of telecasts that are available for viewing on both and their YouTube channel.  Rick Wiles and his team interviewed me.  I was surprised to learn that Rick Wiles had read Hidden Dangers when it was first released.   I had deep differences with Rick Wiles on some subjects (Israel, "Zionism"); however, Rick had promised me when we started that I could speak freely and he would not edit me.  He kept his word and apart from the fact that I would have liked to have been younger and prettier for the shows; I believe they are important.  Deep fatigue from the early morning airport running and the second night the loss of a contact lens, also probably contributed to a few "bloopers" that I noticed, but am not sure anybody else did.  For example, I referred to "Virginia" in connection with my first telephone encounter with Eustace Mullins.  I was in Dallas, Texas for that.  Eustace Mullins had phoned me from his home in Staunton, Virginia.  Oh well!

Rick Wiles has kept up with much of the global governance scene and I think that we added to that on the interviews he did.  The first program I did, I expressed much about my ongoing research on Javier Solana and his continued role in shaping European Union militarization strategy as well as "global governance -- now!"

My first night in Vero Beach, Florida, I awoke early in the morning -- "sleepless in Florida" as I expressed it on my last blogspot article.  Then I read about the "Hapsburg group."  I still do not understand its full significance.    Javier Solana was a proposed member of that elite group being recruited to give favorable "PR" (public relations) to the Yanukovych presidency of the Ukraine back in 2012.  Yanukovych was purportedly sympathetic to Russian hegemonic interests there.

Well, I finished the Rick Wiles interview.  While I have some clearly delineated differences of opinion with them on some views; they did keep their word to me to let me speak freely and not edit my work.  They were very gracious and kind to me while there.  I felt I was able to get a good deal of long suppressed information out in those interviews.  They may be viewed at both and at the TruNews YouTube channel.

It has become increasingly obvious to me that global governance forces are on the march.  The New Age mantra of "crisis = opportunity" is being increasingly invoked in the global governance and European militarization circles.  What looks like populist victories (Brexit, Italy, Mexico, USA's Donald Trump election, Poland, etc.) are cited as reasons to make Global Governance moves in a state of "Global Emergency" declarations.

As I write these words, my own Township Supervisor, Chris Barnett, here in Orion Township, Michigan is caught in Haiti with a group of missionary workers from Kensington Church.  They have been told to "shelter in place" from heavy domestic unrest.  The rioting scenes shown are truly frightening.  It is not difficult to argue that the world is out of control -- hence, the need for "global governance now."

And only a day or two after the TruNews programs aired including discussions about Javier Solana, suddenly global headlines raged that former NATO head Javier Solana was denied an automatic Visa  waiver for travel to the United States.  This was ostensibly because of trips he had made to Iran.   There might have been more to it than a mere bureaucratic bumble -- Javier Solana loudly complained that the Visa waiver denial was "petty."  There is clearly more to it than meets the eye.  I've been watching the news to see if there has been a change in his status.  Immigration comments about the subject indicated he would have to go through the lengthy process just like anybody else and that it could be a long and complicated "vetting process."

Just like the "Hapsburg Group", I'm not sure what was really propelling the Visa waiver denial to Dr. Solana.  I'm watching carefully and I suggest you do too.

Stay tuned!


Anonymous said...

"Shelter In Place": All Hell Breaks Loose In Haiti As Violent Mobs Try To Murder Trapped American Tourists

Constance Cumbey said...





Anonymous said...

The Next American Revolution? #WalkAway

Anonymous said...

Constance starts at the 1 hour point of this 2 hour program.

Glad you kept the discussion on track. Great job, Constance!

And so we watch....

Anonymous said...

Pope Francis Orders Women To 'Breed' With Muslims.

Anonymous said...

Global Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management Market Will Reach USD 666.61 Million by 2024: Zion Market Research

According to the report, global blockchain technology in supply chain management market was valued at around USD 40.99 million in 2017 and is expected to reach approximately USD 666.61 million by 2024, growing at a CAGR of 49.16% between 2017 and 2024.

RayB said...

When the TruNews interview was first made available, I watched the first hour and have yet to watch the 2nd.

A very interesting and revealing part of the interview takes place beginning at 1:46 thru about 1:51. Constance asserts that the "New Agers felt they could not advance their agenda as long as Benedict was Pope." Constance, what definitive proof do you have to support this claim? I would be VERY interested to see that.

Also, in this short segment, Rick Wiles describes attending a very private conference in Davos (as I recall) in which he was invited as an attendee. He describes that there was a witchcraft ceremony that took place, led by an American Indian Shaman, in which a "high ranking Cardinal from the Vatican" not only attended, but participated! Constance's response, or lack thereof, is quite interesting. Watch it for yourself.

Now think about this; a HIGH RANKING CARDINAL from the Vatican openly participates in a witchcraft ceremony, and that isn't worthy of further discussion? Perhaps Constance would take the time to explain why she didn't feel this incredible revelation was important enough to discuss further?

Anonymous said...


It is comments like this that prove you cannot listen without being partial.
She made it clear that this was about the New Age (doctrinal differences could be for another segment) and made her points very well. His point was well brought out, and a good interjection, but Constance necessarily steered the conversation back to the reason she was there in the first place with little time left in the segment.

You often use her venue to promote your own views to the exclusion of all others (heavy handed) to direct conversation toward making converts to your own point of view. That is when your posts become unnecessary and divisive.

I think you can be quite rude.

RayB said...

So, let me get this straight. Wiles makes a very significant point regarding a high ranking Cardinal participating in a NEW AGE WITCHCRAFT ceremony, and you think that "steering" the conversation away from that was "necessary?"

Just for fun, why is it that you think it was "necessary" to steer away from discussing the Vatican participation in a New Age demonic ceremony? I thought this interview WAS about the New Age Movement. What am I missing here?

PS: The truth can often appear to be "rude." Paul stated: "Have I become your enemy because I speak the truth?" They probably thought Paul was rude as well.

Anonymous said...

No, that part was right, but it is the constant critique of Constance about her response about Catholic whatever, that is problematic. She has posted previously about Benedict and his help at that time to attempt to stop New Age influence.
As I said, his (Wiles) point was well brought out. But she was talking New Age, with an emphasis from another standpoint, specifically Solana, and was not addressing that particular issue right then and there, but you make it about that because it is your pet grievance. So you seemed to have lost sight of what she was bringing to the conversation and here on her blog you can't wait to jump right in to divert others by calling attention where attention did not need to be at that moment.
Earlier she spoke with an expressive face that she has many issues with the current Pope most particularly.

She was pointing out truth you slighted in order to highlight yours.
You need your own blog.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Susanna said...

Dear Constance,

More on Solana being denied a US VISA waiver.

Former Nato chief Javier Solana denied US visa waiver

25 June 201

Javier Solana helped negotiate the Iran nuclear deal when he served as the EU's foreign policy chief

Former Nato Secretary General Javier Solana has been denied an automatic visa waiver for entry to the US.

His application for an Electronic System for Travel Authorization (Esta) was denied because of a visit to Iran.

The Spanish citizen must instead apply for a full visa - a more expensive and lengthy process.

Mr Solana, 75, headed Nato between 1995 and 1999. He later became EU foreign policy chief, and helped negotiate the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran.

The visa rules date from the Obama administration, and are unconnected to President Donald Trump's controversial travel ban, which targets Iran and five other Muslim-majority countries.

◾Dual citizens fight new US visa rules
◾Will new US visa changes affect you?

The system prohibits Estas for any citizen of 38 countries who visited Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria or Yemen after 1 March 2011.

They must instead apply for a visa, which involves a face-to-face interview at a US embassy or consulate.

People wait to enter the US at JFK airport in New YorkImage copyright Getty Images
Image caption
The US changed its rules about the visa waiver programme under President Obama

Mr Solana last went to Iran in 2013 when he attended President Hassan Rouhani's inauguration.

"I went there to represent all those who had been involved in the negotiations," he told Spanish TV. "It's a bit of a mean decision."

President Trump announced the US withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal in May.
◾Iran nuclear deal: Key details
◾Could the Iran nuclear deal collapse?

The former Nato chief blamed "an algorithm" for the denied application, and said he needed entry to the US because he teaches at various universities.

British-Iranian BBC journalist Rana Rahimpour was denied entry to the US in January 2016, despite her dual nationality.

Let's not forget that Solana is pals with Strobe Talbott especially since both were members of the Brookings Institute until 2017 when Strobe Talbott stepped down as President. Strobe Talbott is a Russophile who bears a heavy responsibility for the Russian transfer of missile technology to Iran during the Clinton Administration.


Moreover, Bill Clinton, Strobe Talbott, and Richard Gardner were largely responsible for Solana's appointment as head of NATO in 1995!!!

In2016, Javier Solana and Strobe Talbott co-authored an article entitled:


Perhaps Solana's involvement with the formulation of the Iran nuclear deal that President Trump has rejected is one reason for his being denied a U.S. VISA waiver.

Anonymous said...

Ray B, 11.26AM and 12:32PM

What is the Cardinal's name?

RayB said...

If Javier Solana is so incredibly powerful, being Mr. 666 and all, how is it he wasn't able to call up some of his elitist friends in the USA and have his U.S. VISA approved?

Constance said in the Wiles' interview that the "entire U.S. Senate, all 100 of them, once traveled to Europe to meet exclusively with Solana," indicating the incredible power this man has. Personally, I find that account really hard to believe, merely because such a monumental event could not have been kept from the entire media ... there is not ONE WORD to be found anywhere that this actually happened.

The entire Javier Solana is the "Antichrist" is pure fiction. He fulfills virtually nothing as the far as the Biblical prophesies are concerned. Yet, the Papacy does. But let's not go there!

GrantNZ said...

Do watch Constances interview on Truenews.
It's far more like the conversations I have with her about things.
Very engageing and more relaxed atmosphere... some details you may not have heard before.
Would love to see more being produced.


RayB said...

I wonder if Susanna can give us her thoughts on Rick Wiles' (Constance interview) account of the "high ranking Cardinal from the Vatican" that took part in the New Age Witchcraft ceremony that was conducted by an American Indian Shaman?

We already have Constance's comments on it, here it is; "of course."

PS: Rick Wiles stated in the interview he believed this Cardinal was the head of the Vatican's "Foreign Affairs."

Anonymous said...

Questuon: Will An SJW 'George Wallace' Lead Them?

University works to reduce number of white people on campus...

Anonymous said...

Question: Will An SJW 'George Wallace' Lead Them?

University works to reduce number of white people on campus...

Anonymous said...

"The entire Javier Solana is the "Antichrist" is pure fiction. He fulfills virtually nothing as the far as the Biblical prophesies are concerned. Yet, the Papacy does. But let's not go there!"

Yeah, you know everything already don't you.

RayB, go get your own blog.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the refresher on Strobe Talbot, and Solana, Susanna.

Anonymous said...

Now you know Ray B, that pharasee Cumby, white witch Susanna, lukewarm protestant Marky poo, and limp wristed catholics like 9:40 A.M.,dont much care for deplorables like you! Thats why they rarely answer your questions!

Anonymous said...


There are some pretty good reasons why conservatives should be deeply concerned about this pick.  Just because a Republican president nominates someone to the Supreme Court does not mean that individual will make a good judge.  For example, Ronald Reagan nominated Anthony Kennedy in 1987, and he turned out to be a complete and utter disaster.  If Reagan had nominated someone different, the entire modern history of the U.S. Supreme Court could have been completely different.  With the Court still so divided, the stakes are incredibly high, and we must not get another Kennedy.  So it is troubling that Brett Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy and has always had nothing but good things to say about him.  Anyone that would look to Justice Kennedy as any sort of a role model is definitely not fit for a seat on the highest court in the land.

Beyond his connections to Kennedy, what is troubling conservatives more than anything are some of his opinions while serving on the appellate court level.

For instance, not too long ago he ruled that an illegal immigrant “has a right to an abortion in the United States”…

In that opinion he also added that “all parties to this case recognize Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey as precedents we must follow.”


Throughout his entire career, Kavanaugh has been extremely engaged in Republican politics, but he has NEVER expressed public opposition to Roe v. Wade a single time.

So despite the outrageous claims of the left that Roe v. Wade “is about to be overturned”, the truth is that we actually have NO idea how Brett Kavanaugh would rule on Roe v. Wade, and that is absolutely frightening.

All of the “experts” on television keep telling us how “conservative” Kavanaugh is, but looking at his record that is hard to see.

And let us not forget his extremely close ties to the Bush family…

Following a brief period in private law practice, he became Bush’s White House counsel and then staff secretary before he was nominated to be a federal judge. He met his wife while working at the White House, where she was the president’s personal secretary.

Donald Trump likes to think that he is making his mark on the Supreme Court, but the reality of the matter is that we probably would have gotten the EXACT SAME nomination if George W. Bush was still in the White House today.

But most conservatives are going to assume that Kavanaugh must be wonderful since he is “Trump’s choice”, and they are going to rally around him.

Instead, it will be the left that will try to keep Kavanaugh off the Court...

(But) another judge in the mold of Anthony Kennedy is about the best that they could possibly hope for, and that is very likely what they (would) get with Kavanaugh.

In the end, it is true conservatives that should be fighting this nomination

Constance Cumbey said...

To Ray B:

What proof do I have that prominent New Agers said it would not happen as long as John Paul II was pope? It was in a Benjamin Creme book -- is that good enough? I'll have to locate it, but I clearly remember reading it. In early Benjamin Creme lectures he had bragged that "the Pope will bend his knee." But later, he dismayedly wrote that Pope John Paul II had said unkind things about them and that it wouldn't happen while he was pope.


Anonymous said...

Mr. Kavanaugh is catholic. So God only knows what this guy could turn out to be?

Anonymous said...

NETFLIX Airs Star-Spangled 'Salute to Abortion'

‘God bless abortion’: Left’s new tagline pushed in Michelle Wolf skit and LGBT parade
YOUTUBE to Promote, Fund 'Authoritative' News
Feminists Clash with Transgenders at Pride Parade
Scientists Invented AI Made From DNA
Is Europe Awakening To The Migrant Threat?
Backlash building to cashless movement!

RayB said...


Thanks for your response. I'm slightly confused about John Paul II being portrayed as such a stalwart against the New Age Movement.

Here is a very short video put out by a Roman Catholic illustrating John Paul's PROMOTION of the "God is in every religion" heresy ... a tenet of the NAM.

Also, Creme was a proven liar. I wouldn't put much credence upon anything he ever said about anything.

Thanks again,


Anonymous said...


The catholic cult is a slippery serpent. We need interpreters to know what they really said, when they speak. Their goal is to facilitate, and head up the spiritual arm of the NWO. Anyone who has earnestly studied scripture, and has the Holy Spirt, knows full well, that God is not for globalism. Thus the catholic cult is interested in aiding satans globalist goals. They serve him! When they speak, and act, they do so as required of the Beast system that they are a very large, and indepensible part of! The end of the satanic catholc cult is its destruction. All those that follow, it, likewise.

RayB said...


I didn't ask for "proof" regarding John Paul II, but rather, Benedict.

In my post of 11:26 AM, I posted the following:

"A very interesting and revealing part of the interview takes place beginning at 1:46 thru about 1:51. Constance asserts that the "New Agers felt they could not advance their agenda as long as Benedict was Pope." Constance, what definitive proof do you have to support this claim? I would be VERY interested to see that."

Anonymous said...

RayB, your 9:03 AM is exceedingly ignorant.

The Papacy does not have a military at its command nor does it control global governance institutions. The EU does.

The EU built much of the infrastructure. The position of EU High Representative is the only one I know of which was codified with the number 666. The transfer of power to that position is the only one I know of codified with the number 666. Out of sight may mean out of mind. Nevertheless, the infrastructure remains in place and Solana continues to be a key player in the build up of the EU common military.

Solana may or may not be the one, but the person who fills the position of High Representative is the strongest candidate to date.

Anonymous said...

11:40 A.M.

Thats a load of crap!

My Dr.took the number 666 as his employee number! He operated on my hernia several years ago and did a great job. When i asked about his employee number, he did it to mess with people!

I think you have been 'messed with'.

Anonymous said...

Born White?

Tuesday, July, 10, 2018 post

Anonymous said...

FALSE DAWN - The United Religions Initiative, Globalism, And The Quest For A One-World Religion

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Anon 11:48 AM

Your doctor messing with people and EU codified law are very different things. But hey, if you can't see the connection ignorance is bliss. Enjoy.

Anonymous said...

Re: Witchcraft ceremony done in private at Davos

How about what was done in PUBLIC in Switzerland!

The Opening Ceremony of the World’s Largest Tunnel Was a Bizarre Occult Ritual

By Vigilant Citizen
June 3, 2016

Attended by Europe’s most powerful people, the opening ceremony of the Gotthard Base Tunnel in Switzerland was a dark, disturbing, weirdly satanic ritual. Here’s a look at another celebration of the occult elite.
The tunnel took 17 years to complete and is said to be a symbol of European unification in a context of RISING NATIONALISM AND CLOSING BORDERS.

To celebrate the inauguration of this tunnel, an elaborate ceremony was presented in front of European dignitaries such as Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, President Francois Hollande of France and Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. While most would expect an upbeat, celebratory ceremony, guests were rather treated to a disturbing show  orchestrated by German director Volker Hesse, where a man dressed as a goat presided a strange ritual.

As I discussed in my article on the opening and closing ceremonies of the 2012 London Olympics, the occult elite enjoys putting on full display its agenda and philosophy symbolic, dramatic displays which are reminiscent of dramas re-enacted in secret society rituals. Furthermore, there is no better way to showcase sheer power than putting the “Illuminati  stamp of approval” on  massive mega-projects such as the Olympics or major constructions.

The ceremony begins with workers dressed in orange walking slowly to the beat of a rhythmic military drum.

After portraying the workers as zombie soldiers, the ceremony portrays the general population as a bunch of lascivious people who appear to be extremely suggestible.

Then, emerging from that train is a demonic fallen angel, a baby-faced Lucifer.

From this point on, the event turns into an all-out satanic ceremony...

Anonymous said...


There is something very “New World Order” to this militaristic portrayal of the working force. As the drums get more rhythmic, the workers* get more excited, dancing around and jumping through loops.

*Symbolically representing the tunnel construction workers.

Then, things get stranger. A train brings a group of young people** dressed in white underwear.

**Symbolically representing the masses who will use the train.


The second part of the ceremony takes place outside and follows the same basic narrative. Zombie workers go first, followed by people in underwear, to the welcome of Satan himself.

In Conclusion

The occult elite is all about power and symbolism. The above ceremony showcased both. Through the opening ceremony of the world’s deepest and longest tunnel, the occult elite tells the world that they control the world’s resources and manpower. In other words, they are the only ones who can make such projects happen because they control politics, finance, and business. Furthermore, by creating overtly occult  ceremonies, the elite tells the world: “This is what we believe in, this is what we think of you and there is nothing you can do about it.”

The opening ceremony of the  Gotthard Base Tunnel turned a great feat of engineering into a religious ceremony dedicated to Baphomet while somewhat ridiculing the workers who sacrificed their lives and the masses who will travel through the tunnel. Then, Europe’s most powerful people stood up and gave a STANDING OVATION to this ceremony dedicated to the true ruler of the occult elite.

Anonymous said...


Native American lore says if a cardinal crosses your path or attracts your attention, and you're single, there may be a romantic relationship in your near future. If you're already in a relationship, you may experience renewed romance and courtship. If you or your partner have been unfaithful, monogamy is the cardinal's message.

Anonymous said...


As Prosecutor, Brett Kavanaugh: Intimidated, Surveilled And Tampered With Witnesses In The Investigation Of The Death Of Clinton Advisor Vince Foster Whose Body Was Found In Fort Marcy Park

Twice in the recent past so-called Conservative Republican Presidents have had an opportunity to remake the US Supreme Court and set it on a solidly Conservative direction. Unlike President Ronald Reagan who gave us Supreme Court Justices like William Rehnquist and Anthony Kennedy, George H.W Bush gave us David Souter who joined the Liberal block on the court while his son George W Bush gave us John Roberts who cast the deciding vote to save Obama Care. President Donald Trump must be cautious not to make such a mistake.

Donald Trump’s appointment of a second supreme court justice, even before he and his party have to face his 1st mid-term congressional elections, may be the single most consequential decision — and opportunity — of his entire presidency.

This is blazingly apparent just in the insane mass conniption fit thrown by the radical Democrat left since the moment Anthony Kennedy’s resignation was announced. The appointment of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who by all reports is on the President’s short list, would be a mistake, however.

Kavanaugh is not only the candidate of Karl Rove and the Bush family, but the mainstream media praise for his potential appointment shows he is a deep state quisling. Even more troubling, is the fact that Kavanaugh who as a Federal Prosecutor intimidated and tampered with witnesses in the Clinton advisor Vince Foster’s mysterious death and the finding of his body at Fort Marcy Park.

Those on the right who say Foster was murdered by the Clintons are wrong. He did indeed commit suicide, having psychologically been driven to it by Hillary. Although Foster killed himself, it was in his old executive office building office that he did so. Hillary admits in her own biography that she feared Foster’s White House office would become a “crime scene” with Federal Investigators having access to all of Clinton’s most confidential records. Foster’s body was rolled in a carpet and the body was taken and dumped in Fort Marcy Park. The FBI toxicology report confirms that Foster was covered head-to-toe with carpet fiber.

Anonymous said...

A man was driving up the GW Parkway towards home. This unfortunate witness, named Patrick Knowlton, happened by the Park where Foster’s corpse had been transported and staged to look like an on-site suicide.

But when the parkway got congested, pulled into Marcy Park in order to urinate. Knowlton relieves himself behind a bush but upon returning to his car saw two men in a blue automobile with Arkansas license plates. The men were menacing and he left quickly. When he learned on the news that this was the day Clinton’s Presidential aide Vince Foster’s body was found in Fort Marcy Park, Knowlton made the biggest mistake of his life by calling the Parkway police and the FBI and telling them what he did- and did not see. Incredibly, Federal Prosecutor Brett Kavanaugh rather than welcoming this information undertook a campaign to terrorize, threaten and intimidate Knowlton into changing his story.

Kavanaugh working for Special Counsel Ken Star, browbeat, intimidated and tampered with the testimony of Patrick Knowlton who ultimately filed a compelling lawsuit over this prosecutorial abuse. Knowlton’s mistake, he saw the blue sedan with Arkansas plates in which Vince’s body was delivered but Vince’s car a brown sedan also with Arkansas plates had not yet been delivered. It is interesting that Foster’s car keys were found not in his pocket but thrown yards away from his body. In my book “The Clinton’s War On Women”, I identify the thugs who did Hillary’s dirty work, but it is the bullying tactics that render him unfit for Trump’s appointment to the Supreme Court.

The attack on Knowlton by Kavanaugh was brutal. His unequivocal witness statements to the Park Police investigators suddenly created consistency problems for the cover-up story that Foster had driven himself to the park in his brown vehicle and shot himself there. Knowlton saw a different vehicle, not Foster’s, and vehemently denied that Foster’s brown vehicle had been there when Knowlton first arrived. It could only have arrived sometime later after Foster was known to already be dead.

Enter Brett Kavanaugh, a junior rising federal prosecutor supposedly tasked to investigate and, if required, prosecute any matters arising out of the larger Whitewater Special Prosecutor investigation, including the Foster death. Kavanaugh accused Knowlton of being on drugs, of being drunk, of being in the park for a homosexual assignation and badgered him relentlessly to remember the color of the car as brown. Knowlton’s phones were tapped and he was put under physical surveillance, all at the direction of would be Supreme Court Justice Brett, Kavanaugh. All to cover up for the Clintons and silence this inconvenient witness, Patrick Knowlton, who would ultimately file an extraordinary lawsuit against the government.

Anonymous said...


President Trump should not be fooled. U.S. Appeals Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh is the ultimate deep state legal mercenary and ascendant judicial errand boy for the deepest of the deep state. Kavanaugh utterly epitomizes and certainly represents the very same Beltway-Bushier-Yale Law network of diabolical manipulators who saddled Trump with George W. Bush’s loyal FBI chief Robert Mueller as the perpetual in-house persecutor of Trump’s presidency.

The insiders show their hand; before Trump could even pull his list of possible nominees out of his desk drawer, the usual suspects in the fake news corporate media and the extended Bush-Clinton-Obama sedition network that has been gunning for Trump since day one, were busy propping up and pushing Kavanaugh as the frontrunner — the top pick — the odds-on favorite — whatever description they could use to front-load the selection process in Kavanaugh’s favor.

The Swamp has spoken and it wants Kavanaugh.  They will try to make his ascension to the high court seem like an inevitability, even as to President Trump himself. It is incredibly imperative that President Trump rejects these machinations and not consider Kavanaugh for so much as another second.

There are better choices for the court, which badly needs a Libertarian within its Conservative wing. Trump’s emotional favorite for the appointment is Judge Andrew Napolitano, a possibility ruled out by age and his media persona. (Really???) Trump needs a quick, easy confirmation: Senator Mike Lee, a man who I have publicly disagreed with but who I think nonetheless is a principle Libertarian, deeply suspicious of government and the establishment who could be easily confirmed. 

Anonymous said...

"Rick Wiles stated in the interview he believed this Cardinal was the head of the Vatican's 'Foreign Affairs.'"

Cardinal Secretaries of State since 1969

Jean-Marie Villot (2 May 1969 – 9 March 1979)

Agostino Casaroli (1 July 1979 – 1 December 1990)

Angelo Sodano (29 June 1991 – 22 June 2006)

Tarcisio Bertone (15 September 2006 – 15 October 2013)

Pietro Parolin (15 October 2013 – )

Anonymous said...

Susanna said...

Dear Constance,

Re: My first night in Vero Beach, Florida, I awoke early in the morning -- "sleepless in Florida" as I expressed it on my last blogspot article. Then I read about the "Hapsburg group." I still do not understand its full significance. Javier Solana was a proposed member of that elite group being recruited to give favorable "PR" (public relations) to the Yanukovych presidency of the Ukraine back in 2012. Yanukovych was purportedly sympathetic to Russian hegemonic interests there.

Why would Solana want to give favorable PR to a Ukrainian president who was purportedly sympathetic to Russian hegemonic interests there?

The Eurasian Union is not viable without Ukraine. Without Ukraine, there can be no Eurasia as envisioned by Vladmir Putin who is carrying out the agenda of Alexander Dugin, albeit below the radar.

Russia’s Evolving Grand Eurasia Strategy: Will It Work?
Dmitri Trenin
July 20, 2017

For those who think that "Eurasianism" and/or "neo-Eurasianism" is merely some whack-a-doodle conspiracy theory, be advised that the Eurasian Economic Union officially came into force on Janury 1, 2015.

Eurasian Economic Union

Prior to that, the Eurasia Party was established on June 21, 2002.

Eurasia Party

The Eurasia Party (Russian: Евразия) is a Russian political party. It was registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on 21 June 2002, approximately one year after the Pan-Russian Eurasia Movement was established by Aleksandr Dugin. This means that the party enjoys full rights within the Russian political process.

Often seen to be a form of National Bolshevism, one of the basic ideas that underpin Eurasian theories is that Moscow, Berlin, and Paris form a "natural" geopolitical axis, because a line or axis from Moscow to Berlin will pass through the vicinity of Paris if extended.

They foresee an eternal world conflict between land and sea, and hence, Dugin believes, the United States and Russia. He says, "In principle, Eurasia and our space, the heartland (Russia), remain the staging area of a new anti-bourgeois, anti-American revolution." According to his 1997 book, The Basics of Geopolitics, "The new Eurasian empire will be constructed on the fundamental principle of the common enemy: the rejection of Atlanticism, strategic control of the USA, and the refusal to allow liberal values to dominate us. This common civilisational impulse will be the basis of a political and strategic union."

The Eurasia Party was founded by Dugin on the eve of George W. Bush's visit to Russia at the end of May 2002. The party hopes to play a key role in attempts to resolve the Chechen problem, with the objective of setting the stage for Dugin's dream of a Russian strategic alliance with European and Middle Eastern states, primarily Iran more....


Susanna said...


And here a couple of gems I just recently discovered. They are the only places so far that I have seen the Madariaga Foundation - headed by Javier Solana - mentioned in connection with the New Eurasia Foundation.

New Eurasia Foundation Established
Article featured in the June 2004 issue of Alliance magazine

On 21 April founding documents for the first European, Russian and American joint philanthropic initiative were signed. The New Eurasia Foundation (NEF), to be registered in Moscow, was established by three partners: the Washington-headquartered Eurasia Foundation, the Madariaga European Foundation in Brussels and the Moscow-based Dynasty Foundation.

Heads of all three foundations – Charles William Maynes (Eurasia), Dr Javier Solana (Madariaga) and Elena Chernyshkova (Dynasty) signed the documents at the Rockefeller Brothers’ Pocantico estate in upstate New York. Also in attendance were 20 top representatives of major European and US foundations, the EU and US governments and international organizations. The Moscow-based NEF has already received pledges totalling over $50 million. Contributions by USAID, the Charles Stuart Mott Foundation, the Open Society Institute and the Carnegie Corporation are to be matched by European pledges organized by the Madariaga European Foundation. Russian private sources are also being mobilized.

The official launch is planned for mid-summer, first in Moscow and then internationally. In the meantime, Andrei Kortunov has been appointed as NEF’s Acting President, leading civil society figures from the US, Europe and Russia are being recruited to serve on the Board of Directors, and the registration process has already begun in Moscow. NEF will continue the Eurasia Foundation’s best practices in grantmaking and programs, while adding important projects to be defined by the new board.
For further information, contact Gabor Beszterczey, at

New Eurasia Foundation

Community Schools in Russia: Uniting Efforts

Strategic Partnership of Europe, Russia, and the US

Eurasia Foundation going local

Bill Maynes
Article featured in the March 2006 issue of Alliance magazine

Madariaga European Foundation


Eurasia Foundation


Susanna said...


More on Solana being denied a VISA waiver...….

Javier Solana refused US visa waiver because of Iran trips

Former Nato chief, who helped negotiate Iran nuclear deal, was due to speak at event in Washington

Mon, Jun 25, 2018, 15:26

The former Nato secretary general Javier Solana has been refused a visa waiver to enter the US because of his past trips to Iran, one of the countries blacklisted by US Department of Homeland Security .

Mr Solana, who helped negotiate the Iran nuclear deal during his time as the EU’s foreign policy chief, had been due to speak at an event at Washington’s Brookings Institution, but learned he would not be able to enter the US after trying to apply for an electronic visa waiver.

Under the system, those who have visited any of seven blacklisted countries – Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen – on or after March 1st, 2011 are barred from receiving the waiver and have to apply for a visa. The rules predate Donald Trump’s controversial travel ban on five Muslim-majority countries and North Korea.

“It’s a bit of a mean decision,” Mr Solana told Spain’s Antena 3 TV channel on Monday. “I don’t think it’s good because some people have to visit these complicated countries to keep negotiations alive.”

Mr Solana, who has also served as Spain’s foreign minister, said he had been invited to Iran in 2013 to attend President Hassan Rouhani’s inauguration.

“I went there to represent all those who had been involved in the negotiations,” he said. “I’ll see what I can do to fix this. It’s a computer – an algorithm – and if you’ve been in Iran lately, they take you out of the system. It’s like you don’t exist visa-wise, because you can’t visit the country.”

Mr Solana said he hoped to resolve the situation soon as he had professional commitments to honour in the US: “I need to go because I need to work there and I’m a professor at various universities.”

Mr Trump withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal last month, despite strenuous European objections. Iran has said it will decide in the next few weeks whether to pull out of the deal, signed in 2015, and start enriching uranium capable of making a nuclear bomb. – Guardian

Just this past May, Solana was critical of President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal.

A New Era of Nuclear Uncertainty,

May 11, 2018 | Javier Solana

If I were Trump, I would deny him a VISA waiver as well!!! However, I am somewhat gratified to learn that this was an Obama VISA policy, and not a Trump policy.

By the way, did you notice that one of the partners in the New Eurasia Foundation is The Open Society Institute founded by George Soros? Interestingly, the Carnegie Foundation, which pretty much seized control of education in this country is also involved. Back in the day, the Carnegie Foundation, along with the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, was one of the big tax-exempt foundations under investigation by the Reece Committee when it was suspected of using its tax exempt status to peddle socialism/communism/oligarchical collectivism.

Norman Dodd, in the famous interview said that the objective was to comfortably merge the United States with the Soviet Union. One has to wonder if the current objective is to comfortably "merge" the European Union with the Eurasian Union with Moscow replacing Brussels as its new capitol.

Anonymous said...

Rich Peterson - Medford said...


You may find this an interesting read.

Anonymous said...

I watched your video's from TruNews yesterday Constance, before I'd even seen your blog post here about them !! You have tremendous recall ! The very many mentions of '666' in relation to Javier Solana is as disturbing now as it was when I first read your write ups about the man.
Very disturbed too about Newt G. Do you think he's changed his tune at all over the years?

Hello Susannah....

From OZ

Susanna said...

Hello Oz,

Great to hear from you!

If you and everyone here has time to follow President Trump's recent dressing down of NATO members.....and especially Germany, which he publicly called a "captive of Russia," you will be gratified to learn that President Trump isn't going to put up with any double-dealing politicians.

President Trump has a hard time understanding Germany's willingness to make energy deals with the very country (Russia) we are helping to protect them against.

"Germany is a captive of Russia:"
Trump Dresses down NATO's Secretary General and threatens Berlin over its lagging defense spending and energy partnership with Putin's government.

.Donald Trump unleshed his fury on NATO Secretary General Stens Stoltenberg on Wednesday morning after the leader asked him about gripes about Germany

."Germany is totally controlled by Russia, Trump charged. "I think it's a very bad thing for NATO."

.President Trump has berated America's European allies for failing to meet their defense spending obligations to more

From our ally Israel...…..

'Germany Is a Captive of Russia': Trump Slams Berlin Ahead of NATO Summit

Trump appeared to be referring to the Nord Stream 2 pipeline that would bring gas from Russia to Germany's northeastern Baltic coast

Jul 11, 2018 11:38 AM

U.S. President Donald Trump claimed a pipeline project has made Germany "totally controlled" by and "captive to Russia" during a combative breakfast Wednesday that kicked off what was already expected to be a fraught NATO summit.

Trump, in a testy exchange with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, took issue with the U.S. protecting Germany when the European nation is making deals with Russia.

The president appeared to be referring to the Nord Stream 2 pipeline that would bring gas from Russia to Germany's northeastern Baltic coast, bypassing Eastern European nations like Poland and Ukraine and doubling the amount of gas Russia can send directly to Germany. The vast undersea pipeline is opposed by the U.S. and some other EU members, who warn it could give Moscow greater leverage over Western Europe.

"You tell me, is that appropriate?" he asked, adding that: "Germany is totally controlled by Russia."


Susanna said...


He later said that, "Germany as far, as I'm concerned, is captive to Russia" and urged NATO to look into the issue. Trump was expected to see German Chancellor Angela Merkel later in the day.

Stoltenberg pushed back, stressing that NATO members have been able to work together despite their differences.

The dramatic exchange set the tone for what was already expected to be a tense day of meetings with leaders of the military alliance. Trump is expected to continue hammering jittery NATO allies about their military spending during the summit meeting, which comes amid increasingly frayed relations between the "America first" president and the United States' closest traditional allies.

Trump, in a message to Germany, asked why the U.S. should "protect you against Russia" when the two countries are making deals.
…… more.....

I saw this glorious exchange between Trump and Stoltenberg live on Fox News this morning. President Trump dressed Stoltenberg down to his face as he was sitting right across the breakfast table from him.

Let us not forget that Javier Solana is a former NATO Secretary General.

Stoltenberg, who is the current secretary general of NATO, was appointed by Angela Merkel during the Obama administration.

Angela Merkel, the Chancellor of Germany, took the initiative to appoint Stoltenberg as Secretary-General, securing the support first of the United States, then of the United Kingdom, and then of all other member states.....

…."He was once a member of the then Marxist-Leninist group Red Youth, had regular contacts with KGB agent disguised as Soviet diplomat, and participated in protest rallies against the U.S. war in Vietnam. In 2011, Stoltenberg said "We sang the chorus, ‘Singing Norway, Norway out of Nato'. It was a hit."

Thankfully, President Trump is wise to the shenanigans of certain NATO members and has every intention of doing something about withdrawing our troops if they do not straighten up and fly right.....leaving them to the tender mercies of "Mother Russia."

Susanna said...

Rich, 9:34 PM

Thank you for the link.

I scanned it and it does look interesting. I am going to study it and get back to you.

Anonymous said...

Beating a dead horse.

Business as usual.

RayB said...


If the mean and nasty Javier Solana was denied a U. S. VISA, for apparently being heavily involved in the New World Order ... why then should the Pope ever be granted a VISA?

The Pope stands for the very same things, if not more, than does "Mr. 666."

The Pope has endorsed both UN Agenda 21 & UN Agenda 2030. He promotes share the wealth Marxism. He advances the bogus scientific hoax Climate Change. He promotes the EU along with the New World Order. He was against BREXIT. He promotes an international economic order. During our election, he stated Trump "was not a Christian" (because of the wall), thereby colluding with the globalist Clinton to get her elected. He promotes damaging trade policies. He promotes open borders. He has said on numerous occasions that nations "should not build walls." He cries out against nationalism/populism. He openly works towards the creation of a One World Religion AND a One World Government. He involves himself in the political affairs of sovereign nations ... EXCEPT when it came to the legalization of abortion in Ireland, whereby the Pope suddenly lost his voice. During his Cuban visit, he failed to criticize Cuba's persecution of people based on politics and religion. He did the same in Communist China and then allowed the COMMUNIST Chinese government to appoint THEIR Communist Catholic Bishops. During his entire Western Hemisphere trip, the ONLY time he mentioned the name of Jesus Christ was when he made his statement regarding Christ's "failure of the cross." A few weeks later, he repeated this blasphemy at the Vatican. He has stated that "gays and atheists that do good will all go to heaven." He has stated that "gays are born that way and God is pleased with them." He has stated that "Christians, Jews, and Muslims" all worship the same God, which is a denial of Jesus Christ (John 14:6), etc., etc., etc.

The Pope has done all of the above, and much, much more on the world's stage. He has enormous influence. In comparison, Javier Solana is a bit player. Ask virtually ANYONE (seriously, try this) who Solana is and I guarantee it they won't even have a clue!

Not long ago, this Pope spoke to a Joint Session of Congress ... a rarity. Seriously, can anyone here even begin to imagine the same invitation extended to Javier Solana?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...


What you say of the pope applies to just about every globalist world leader. The scripture doesn't say that the antichrist has to be a well known personality. Traditionally dictators are are political-military individuals. I think you're barking up the wrong tree in hopes it is the pope.

Anonymous said...

11:15 A.M.

It's not important that the pope is not the AC. It is important that someone who is supposedly the caretaker of at last a billion souls does not know, or most likely care, about the will of God. It is certainly NOT the will of God for a so called church leader, to be greatly involved with world politics! Its obvious to anyone who has studied scriptute, that one of satans chief goals has always been to create a one world system of government, and spirituality. That is why followers of Christ warn that the catholic institution is NOT christian, but rather a satanic organization.

Anonymous said...

Sorry about spelling errors @ 11:35 A.M. It isn't easy to type on a mobile device with too much natural light in the background!

Constance Cumbey said...

To Anonymous 10:31 re comment "Pope orders women to breed with Muslims" . . .

Although I have ample issues with Pope Francis, based on the material contained in the link you supplied, I cannot interpret his story about declining European population due to abortion to be the equivalent of telling women to "breed with Moslems. I interpreted it as saying they should welcome and integrate them into their neighborhoods. Interestingly, Javier Solana said practically the same thing in the book of his interviews with the Catalan journalist Lluis Bassetts. The Solana book in Spanish is called "Reivindicacion de la Politica. The English translation is "Reclaiming Politics."

I do not know if it was a misstatement, a misinterpretation, or a clever game of "watch the fundamentalists run" at this point.



Susanna said...

Dear Constance,

Re: "Pope orders women to breed with Muslims"

Ordinarily, I wouldn't waste my time debating with advocates of "Hislopianity," but in this case I will make an exception on account of the fact that the author of this fake news appears to be pro-Russian along with the fake news site YourNewsNow which is also pro-Russian!!!

Quelle coincidence!!!

Don't you think that it is a little strange that every time you start a new thread relating to Javier Solana or other related topics like the New World Order certain entities who post here completely bury your thread in their "Pope is the Antichrist" twaddle in order to change the subject in the comments section???

Here is what Snopes has to say about this fake news article.

Did Pope Francis Order White Women to ‘Breed’ with Muslims?

Statements from the pontiff about European assimilation of migrants were absurdly characterized by a fake news more...

The name of the fake news site where the fake news about the Pope is posted is YourNewsWire.


Here are some of the other "fact-filled" (NOT!) stories from this site:

Ironically, the author of the article is Baxter Dmitry, a purveyor of fake news at the pro-Russian fake news site YourNewsWire. He is said to rival "Sorcha Faal."


If anyone has issues with the Pope, fine-as long as these "issues" can be shown to be fact and not fiction

There have also been a couple of comments here about a high ranking Cardinal from "the Vatican" who allegedly took part in witchcraft rituals. The name of the Cardinal was not given.

I happen to know of at least two Cardinals who allegedly did take part in occult rituals, but I am not going to say more until the people doing the accusing here name names. Otherwise, I am just going to assume that they are merely blowing smoke in order to divert attention away from the subject of your thread.

Getting back to Antichrist, the way I learned it, the Antichrist, when he comes, is going to accuse someone else of being the Antichrist....because he is just like his father the devil a.k.a. "the accuser of the brethren."

Anonymous said...

Hi Susanna.

Especially interesting point, that last! I imagine that since The Beast + The False Prophet are going to be (so to speak) 'squaring off' against The Two Witnesses, it's a pretty good bet that TB & TFP will call THE TWO WITNESSES "The Beast & The False Prophet"!

Anonymous said...


(Relying on the Biblical ignorance of their audience. Anyone well-versed with Biblical knowledge would find it laughable.)

Susanna said...


The following article is three years old, but it is still relevant. It has to do with Russia's "weaponization of information."

Think That News Story Online Is a Hoax? It May Be Written By Russian Propagandists

Other examples of fake news articles about the Pope by Baxter Dmitry of the fake news site YourNewsWire are:

Pope Francis: World Government Must Rule U.S. ‘For Their Own Good’

Pope Francis Calls On US Authorities To Disarm The Population
April 30, 2018

‘Pope Francis is Not A Man Of God’ | Putin
August 7, 2017

Pope Francis Calls For ‘One World Government’ To ‘Save Humanity’

Pope Francis Forgives 4,444 Pedophile Priests In Australia

Monday, 26 March 2018
By Baxter Dmitry Your News Wire

Pope Francis: ‘Relationships With Jesus Are Dangerous And Harmful’ – By Baxter Dmitry

Given some of the articles I have seen posted here, I wouldn't be surprised if Baxter Dmitry were posting on this blog anonymously or under a pseudonym as he reportedly does frequently.

Anonymous said...

'White Witch' Susanna:

Just like you to twist words!

I said "Ron POPEIL" is the Anti-Christ!

Baxter Dmitry

(Wait...which blogspot is this?)

Anonymous said...

'White Witch' Susanna:

Just like you to twist words!

I said "Ron POPEIL" is the Anti-Christ!

Baxter Dmitry

(Wait...which blogspot is this?)

Susanna said...

Anonymous 2:24PM, 2:31PM

Good point.

I am currently reading a very interesting book on endtimes prophecy according to the Catholic interpretation.

Trial, Tribulation & Triumph: Before, During, and After Antichrist
by Desmond Birch

I think we are in agreement about the two witnesses. According to Catholic endtimes prophecy, the "two witnesses" are Enoch and Elias who have not yet died. Eventually, both are going to return to earth in order to expose the Antichrist to the world by their preaching and by the astonishing wonders and miracles they will be allowed to work by the power of God. Elias is going to preach to the Jewish people. Enoch is going to preach to the gentiles. They are both going to be killed by Antichrist and their bodies are going to be allowed to lie in the streets without being buried. In three days they will be raised by God from the dead to the chagrin of Antichrist and his minions.

A very ancient account of Antichrist was written by the Church Father St. Hippolytus who was a disciple of St. Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyons and Martyr. St. Irenaeus was a disciple of St. Polycarp, who,in turn, was a disciple of St. John the Apostle. St. John the Apostle was the inspired author of the Fourth Gospel and the Book of Revelations.

You can read it right the treatise here for free.

On Christ and Antichrist
St. Hippolytus

As for the name of the Antichrist, this name has not been revealed. Moreover, St. Irenaeus warns us never to presume to think that we know the name of the Antichrist:

Moreover, another danger, by no means trifling, shall overtake those who falsely presume that they know the name of Antichrist. For if these men assume one [number], when this [Antichrist] shall come having another, they will be easily led away by him, as supposing him not to be the expected one, who must be guarded against. Against Heresies 5.30.1

Anonymous said...

11:15 AM, you are right.

2 thess says the man of sin will be revealed.
Solana appears to be "hidden" in plain sight.
Is he the anti-christ? I don't know that, as whoever he is, he has not been revealed yet.
But that day is coming.
Pope Francis sure has been doing his part to set the stage for all this and he fills the role of false prophet in my mind, but we shall see, won't we?

And, this is called the age of deception for a reason.

We must stick to scripture but be open that some things won't add up until more light shines on the subject and a little more hindsight can backlight current events and players leading up to that particular man, so this is still fluid.

Susanna said...

Anti-Trump Protest at NATO Draws Only a Couple Dozen

"Make Peace Great Again" organizers were expecting a few thousand protestors to for President Trump's visit, but only a couple dozen showed up.

Anonymous said...

I agree with RayB that there are many, many, many serious issues with this pope but I have difficulty envisioning a 10-nation military federation handing Pope Francis command over their militaries. I see the pope more as a willing participant prepared to lead people towards acceptance of Maitreya. As the Theosophists proclaim, Maitreya “is not a religious leader, but an educator in the broadest sense -- pointing the way out of the present world crisis.”

Anonymous said...

And they heard a great voice from heaven saying unto them, Come up hither. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them. Rev. 11:12

The Bible itself speaks of at least three different "heavens." There is the heaven of God's throne (Rev.4:1-3); then there is the heaven where the planets and stars and galaxies circulate (Gen.1:1); and finally, there is the heaven which is the atmosphere of the earth -- the heaven where the birds fly (Gen.1:20). 

Which heaven did the two witnesses ascend up to? 

Actually, in history, the Bible does record one man, other than Christ Himself, who, like the two witnesses, "ascended to heaven" when his ministry was finished.   He was, like them, a prophet of God -- a mighty prophet -- the prophet Elijah! We read the account in II Kings: "And it came to pass, as they still went on, and talked, that, behold, there appeared a chariot of fire, and horses of fire, and parted them asunder; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into HEAVEN" (II Kgs.2:11).

Elijah was taken to "heaven"! But what "heaven" did he go to? Many have assumed that Elijah never died, and that he was taken to the heaven of God's throne. Some also assume that Enoch never died, because we read in the book of Genesis:  "And Enoch walked with God; and he was not; for God took him" (Gen.5:24). Does this mean God took him to heaven?

But that would contradict the plain words of the Messiah Himself: "And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven." John 3:3

So what did happen to Enoch and Elijah?

Anonymous said...

Did Enoch and Elijah Go to Heaven?

Actually, this mystery is cleared up for us in the book of Hebrews, in the New Testament. The truth is, as the apostle Paul wrote, all the saints of God died. He enumerated specifically Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, and Sarah, and said: "These ALL died in faith, not having received the promises". (Heb.11:13) Enoch was among these mentioned (verse 5). What did Paul mean, then, when he said that Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him"? (v.5). Men have assumed this meant he went to heaven and never died. But Enoch was human flesh, and all flesh dies (Eccl.3:18-20). "All go to one place; ALL are of the dust, and ALL turn to dust again" (v.19). The Greek word for "translated" here is metatithemi (#3346 in Strong's Concordance) and means, "to transfer, i.e., transport," by impl., "to exchange, carry over, change, remove, translate, turn."

In other words, Enoch was "removed" or "carried over" by God from one place to another, for his own protection. Since he was a prophet of God, and the world hated him for preaching the truth and warning them of their sins, they sought to kill him, as they have done to all God's prophets from the beginning of time. But God saw to it that he was protected -- God removed him from danger, and from their presence, to a "safe place." When his ministry was fulfilled, God "took him" -- that is, He had his angels remove him from danger and carried him to a "place of safety" on this earth. Thus he did not ascend to heaven at all!

Anonymous said...

What about Elijah?

Elijah, who was taken in the sky by a chariot and fiery horses (II Kings 2:11), was not taken to the heaven of God's throne, but also was merely transferred to another location on the earth. This occurred in 896 B.C., according to Ussher's chronology. In 893 B.C., about three years later, Jehoshaphat, king of Judah, appoints his son Jehoram as king, at the age of 32 years; he reigned for eight years (II Kings 8:16-18). He was a wicked king and walked in the ways of the kings of Israel (v.18). He married the daughter of Ahab (II Chron.21:6). During his reign, he received a letter from Elijah the prophet who reproached him for his apostasy and warned that he would die of a great disease of the bowels (II Chron. 21:12-15).

"And after all this the LORD smote him in his bowels with an incurable disease. And it came to pass, that in process of time, after the end of two years, his bowels fell out by reason of his sickness; so he died of sore diseases" (vs.18-19). Jehoram's death occurred in 885, and his disease lasted about two years, so Elijah's letter must have been written and sent about 887 B.C. This would have been about nine years after his supposed "ascension" into heaven via the fiery chariot and horses! Thus Elijah was not taken to the heaven of God's throne, thus contradicting the words of Christ (John 3:13) but was taken through the atmospheric heaven surrounding the earth, and taken to a remote location to live out his life. During this time he wrote the letter mentioned above.

Again, we know that Elijah died from the New Testament witness. In Hebrews 11 we read of him, one of God's prophets who raised a woman's son to life again (Heb.11:32-35). Paul says of all these men, "And these ALL, having obtained a good report through faith, RECEIVED NOT THE PROMISE: God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect" -- that is, receive the promises, eternal life and salvation (Heb.11:39-40). Thus they are still waiting in their graves for the resurrection, even as king David is (Acts 2:29).

There is no indication whatsoever that Enoch and Elijah will literally be resurrected and be brought back to earth to be the two witnesses. Rather, God Himself will raise up two men, "in the power and spirit of Elijah," men who are filled with the Spirit of God, the anti-types of Joshua and Zerubbabel (Zech.4-5). One of these men will be the one prophesied to come "in the spirit and power of Elijah," as John the Baptist did before Christ's second coming (Mal.4:4; Luke 1:13-17).

{Adapted from the writings of William F. Dankenbring

Anonymous said...


John 3:13 (instead of John 3:3)

Anonymous said...


I had just this morning watched a video of Donald at the Bilateral breakfast with NATO secretary Stoltenberg. As always, Donald speaks common sense, straight up. No beating around the bush. He can't hide his frustration at their stupidity either !!(relying on Russian energy) Written all over his face. Well, I don't suppose Donald would care one way or the other what foolishness went on between this lot if the US taxpayers weren't having to foot the bill via NATO. This is the GREAT thing about your President Trump...he actually cares about the country he represents. And isn't that what a President is supposed to do? His presidency has put such a spanner in the works so it would seem !! Can't forget watching Richard Branson in a panic at a Vatican meeting last year because Donald was now the President. The plans of a certain few are being foiled by Donald.....thank God.

From OZ

Unknown said...


whatsapp:+(2347082119261) OR
Are you a
It is pertinent to also know that For becoming a
member ,you
Will be giving the sum of $100, 000, 000. 00 as the
Illuminati membership
salary monthly . Please be a part of these
"OPPORTUNITY " The great Illuminati
Organization makes you rich
and famous in the world , it will pull you out
from the grass root
and take you to a greater height were you have
long aspired to be
and together we shall rule the world with the
great and mighty
power of the Illuminati , long life and
prosperity here on earth with
eternal life and jubilation.

whatsapp us:
+2347082119261 or
if you are INTERESTED .

Anonymous said...

Jimmy Carter: 'Jesus would approve of gay marriage'

Anonymous said...
WATCH: Antifa Attack Old Lady At Prayer Vigil For Tommy Robinson!

Anonymous said...

Susanna said...

Oz 7:41PM,

I think President Trump is doing a stellar job as President of the United States. I believe that when all is said and done he will have pulled this country back from a sociopolitical abyss.

What Trump was verbally nuking at the Bilateral breakfast with NATO secretary Stoltenberg was the secret gas pipeline deal Frau Merkel made with the Russians. Here is part of the transcript from the Rush Limbaugh Show.

Trump Calls Out Merkel’s Pipeline Pact with Russia
Jul 11, 2018

RUSH: Funny, the Nord Stream pipeline. This is the special pipeline direct to Germany from Russia, a deal made between Putin and Angela Merkel. Trump called ’em out on it today. This pipeline strikes at the heart of NATO unity. We didn’t have anything to do with it. This is Angela Merkel sabotaging other NATO nations by making a straight deal with Putin while every other pipeline goes through all the other European nations. This pipeline gets… For now, ’cause Putin controls the price, it gets cheap Russian gas to Germany and bypasses all of the smaller eastern European nations, and this gives Russia incredible leverage over Merkel! It allows Russia to pressure them while Germany is held harmless. It’s bad policy for NATO countries, and Trump has the guts to call ’em out on this! Here is another bite from Trump on essentially the point I just made. Here it is…

THE PRESIDENT: Germany is totally controlled by Russia because they were getting from 60 to 70% of their energy from Russia and their new pipeline, and you tell me if that’s appropriate, because I think it’s not. And I think it’s a very bad thing for NATO, and I don’t think it should have happened, and I think we have to talk to Germany about it.

RUSH: Well, all hell got broke loose at that point. You just don’t call out other nations like this. You wink and nod. You look the other way. You talk to ’em about it behind closed doors, and then you go out and tell everybody, “We’ve had substantive discussions with Chancellor Merkel over the pipeline, and we’re working behind the scenes to alleviate concerns,” when none of that ever happens! It’s just a bunch of diplospeak everybody engages in.

Here is Trump confronting her and the rest of NATO about it. So the media’s gonna fact-check this. “Is Trump really right? Is Germany gonna the bet 70% of its gas from Russia?” He’s right-on-the-button right. U.K. Daily Mail: “Donald Trump Is RIGHT — Germany imports 70% of its gas from Russia in a controversial deal that has enriched [Merkel] and it will soon receive even MORE, but the U.S. could step in.” See, Trump wants to sell natural gas to NATO. We have become one of the largest energy exporters in the world.

Trump thinks it would make much more sense for Germany to get natural gas from an ally than a potential enemy, but Merkel goes around everybody’s back and made her own sweet deal that she’s personally profiting from. Other people have looked into this, and it “[t]urns out Trump’s not wrong about the level of Russian imports expected by Germany from its new Nord Stream 2 pipeline. The BBC confirms that Trump’s estimation is pretty much in line with analyst expectations:

“‘The latest official E.U. figure for imports of Russian gas to Germany is between 50% and 75%…’ So it’s right there. Now, you might think, “What’s the big deal about this?” This isn’t done! NATO nations calling each other out, other NATO nations being told how they’re being screwed by…? Germany’s not paying much yet toward the requirement for spending certain percentage GDP on defense, in addition to everything else Germany’s done by opening its borders. It’s a mess, and Trump is simply calling ’em out
...…

It is being implied that Merkel benefitted personally from this deal with Russia.


Susanna said...


The following part of the Rush Limbaugh Show made me laugh out loud.

RUSH: By the way, folks, where are the environmentalist wackos? Here’s Germany moving away from clean energy and back to fossil fuels. Natural gas is a fossil fuel energy that the environmentalist wackos hate, plus it’s coming from Putin! They hate Putin! Putin stole the election from Hillary, don’t you know? It’s really bugging them that Trump is now criticizing Germany for working with Putin when they think that Trump ought to be praising Putin and Germany for doing the deal because of the absolute convoluted worldview they now have on the left.

Just for the fun of it, I want to share with you some audio sound bites of the left losing it over Trump and his supposed insult of Angela Merkel and Germany and confronting NATO directly with what he considers to be this outrage. This is NATO not behaving in the best interests of NATO. He’s asking what good is NATO if Germany is paying Russia billions of dollars in a sweetheart deal for gas and energy and is not paying its fair share toward defending NATO nations from Russia? Do I need to put this in perspective?

NATO exists because of Vladimir Putin, NATO exists because of the Soviet Union, and Putin wants to rebuild Russia back into the Soviet Union. He’s made no bones about it. That’s what his objective is. So here is a member nation from NATO striking an exclusive natural gas pipeline deal. None of the other NATO member nations are participating in it, and therefore not getting any of the so-called benefits from it. entire transcript...

Susanna said...

P.S. Oz,

By the way, are you aware that President Trump only accepts a dollar a year for his salary ( he has to be paid the $1.00 by law ) and donates the rest of his $400,000.00 salary to charity?

Other members of his cabinet like Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross are also "dollar a year" men.

Anonymous said...

President Trump Rocks! Gives Germany Hell for Investing Heavily in Russia

By S. Noble
Independent Sentinel
July 11, 2018

"I never did give anybody hell. I just told the truth and they THOUGHT it was hell!” ~ Harry S. Truman

Trump was great at NATO today but you wouldn’t know it from the media reports. While the U.S. left and the EU socialists look down on President Trump, mocking him, Trump’s popularity ratings are higher than theirs. The President called out the EU, using Germany as a prime example of what’s wrong with NATO.


As the White House reported today, President Trump delivered a clear message to America’s allies at NATO: The Transatlantic Alliance is too important not to invest in [pay the money for defense that they committed to].

While we sanction Russia, Merkel is sending Russia cash and plenty of it. Germany funnels money through a new direct pipeline with Russia

The media and U.S. left won’t mock Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel. Yet, the money she pays them for gas goes directly to the Russian military.

They aren’t investing as partners in NATO, not when Germany’s military shows up at a NATO exercise with broomsticks and pretends they’re weapons.

At least that’s what The Sun UK isreporting.

Broomstick warfare

Nancy Pelosi outdid her own dumbest remarks today in a tweet:

She wrote in a tweet: “@realDonaldTrump’s brazen insults & denigration of one of America’s most steadfast allies, Germany, is an embarrassment. His behavior this morning is another profoundly disturbing signal that the President is more loyal to President Putin than to our NATO allies.

By her logic, Pelosi is saying that by Trump insisting Germany shouldn’t give money to Russia, he is helping Putin. Hmmm….is money a bad thing to give Putin then? Doesn’t he like cash?

Trump speaks the truth and Pelosi calls it an insult. So be it then.

Anonymous said...

Speaker Ryan sort of defended Trump but James Wood showed him up.

“NATO is indispensable. It’s as important today as it ever has been,” Ryan told reporters on Wednesday.

Then he added, “The president is right to point out that our NATO allies need to adhere to their commitments which is two percent of GDP for defense,” Ryan said. “Germany is the largest economy in the EU. Germany should be committing two percent to defense like they agreed to.”

He also told reporters he won’t criticize the President while he is overseas. So, he’ll bash him when he returns?

Reporters wanted Ryan to condemn the President for telling the truth about Germany being a “captive of Russia” for getting 60 to 70 percent of the gas and energy from Russia.

It’s good to hear someone tell the truth. We finally have an honest leader with courage, by that I mean actor James Woods.


Actor James Woods came out with a far stronger defense of the President and he did it just by telling the truth! "Talk about 'fundamental transformation' of our nation. Trump is recasting America as the sovereign superpower of the world. He has done more of what he promised in a year and a half than any president in modern history. Merkel is a progressive chump. …"

Anonymous said...


Thanks for the Rush rundown on all of this re Germany, Russia, NATO etc. Trump can't be controlled when he wants to let everyone in on a thing. Most endearing quality. I knew he only received a dollar for his effort as your President and its not like he needs the money but I feel he deserves quadruple the standard salary considering all he's had to deal with every single day of this presidency. He is obviously a very solid, strong individual. Who else could tolerate what's been thrown at him? He didn't need this thankless job and didn't even want it but SOMEONE has had to stand up and try to fix the mess. You are lucky to have him.

from OZ

From OZ

Susanna said...


Re: The Hapsburg Group

The Mueller indictment mentioned the ‘Hapsburg group.’ Now European ex-politicians are under scrutiny.

In an indictment updated Friday, special counsel Robert S. Mueller III accused Paul Manafort and Rick Gates of secretly retaining “a group of former senior European politicians to take positions favorable to Ukraine, including by lobbying in the United States.”

These former European leaders would claim to provide independent assessments of the Kiev government, but would in fact be “paid lobbyists” for Ukraine. In 2012 and 2013, Manafort used at least four offshore bank accounts to wire more than 2 million euros (roughly $2.5 million) to the group, the indictment states.

Though the group's members weren't named, they are collectively given an informal nickname: the “Hapsburg group,” an apparent reference (using an alternative spelling) to the Habsburg royal dynasty that ruled the Holy Roman Empire for centuries.

If the allegations prove accurate, it would be an example of how the American political operatives sought to influence international politics for Manafort's client, the political party of Viktor Yanukovych, then the Ukrainian president. Yanukovych later fled to Russia after protests against his regime.

In 2016, Manafort and Gates went to work for the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, which is why Mueller's team has been investigating them. Gates on Friday pleaded guilty to conspiracy to evade paying taxes and lying to the FBI over questions about his and Manafort's work with the Ukrainians, while striking a deal to cooperate with federal prosecutors.

Mueller is tasked with looking into Russian efforts to interfere with the 2016 presidential election, including possible interactions with the Trump campaign.

The “Hapsburg group” detail in the indictment released Friday triggered widespread attention in Europe, as well as speculation over which European politicians were in Manafort's alleged group.

One European politician, “Foreign Politician A” in the document, is described as a “former European Chancellor.” In 2013, this politician led a group that “lobbied United States Members of Congress, officials in the executive branch, and their staffs” in coordination with Manafort and Gates, the indictment states.

There are two countries where the word “chancellor” is used to describe the head of state. Both happen to have strong historical links to the Habsburg dynasty — Austria and Germany.

In Europe, speculation quickly fell upon Alfred Gusenbauer, who was Austria's chancellor in 2007 and 2008. Since leaving office, Gusenbauer has been criticized for paid consulting work he has undertaken for autocratic regimes. He was also named in the Panama Papers, an enormous 2016 leak of documents from an offshore banking network.


Susanna said...


According to a disclosure form filed retroactively in 2017 by the Manafort-linked lobbying firm Mercury, Gusenbauer in 2013 met with House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Edward R. Royce (R-Calif.), Reps. Tom Marino (R-Pa.) and Robert B. Aderholt (R-Ala.), as well as with committee staffers and others.

Speaking to Die Presse on Saturday, Gusenbauer confirmed that he had met with American politicians around that time and did not deny that he had received money from an “American or English company,” but he said he was not aware of any links to Manafort. In the article, Gusenbauer did say he had met Manafort previously — once in Europe and once in the United States — but it was “just for a coffee.”

Gusenbauer also defended his intentions in an interview with the BBC, saying that he was part of a “noble” effort to bring Ukraine closer to the European Union, but he repeated that he was not aware of Manafort financing this activity. “I was not employed by Mr. Yanukovych's government,” he said. “I was, in the European, and American and general interest, working for an association agreement between Ukraine and Europe.” more......

Susanna said...

Mueller names 'Hapsburg group,' reveals Manafort messages

By Lucien Bruggeman, Allison Pecorin and Soo Rin Kim
Jun 13, 2018,

A new filing from the special counsel Robert Mueller unsealed on Wednesday identifies two former journalists and the content of messages former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and a Russian associate sent them in February, just two days after a superseding indictment against Manafort.

The 21-page document also names members of the so-called “Hapsburg group” – described by Mueller in the February superseding indictment of Manafort as "a group of former senior European politicians to take positions favorable to Ukraine, including by lobbying in the United States.”

According to the document, some of the key participants of the Hapsburg group are former Austrian Chancellor Alfred Gusenbauer, former Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi, Belgian Judge Jean-Paul Moerman, head of the German Federal Chancellory Bodo Hombach and former Spanish NATO head Javier Solana.

The exhibit containing the names of Alan Friedman, Eckart Sager, Konstantin Kliminck, and Hapsburg group members, was filed by the clerk in an unredacted form on Wednesday afternoon but was re-filed a short time later in a redacted form with those names hidden.

Sager did not respond to ABC News' request for comment. Friedman was unable to be reached for comment

The existence of the text messages first came to light earlier this month, but the content of the messages was not publicly known until Wednesday’s filing. Last Thursday, Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling during the 2016 election, cited the messages in accusing Manafort and his Russian associate, Konstantin Kliminck, of witness-tampering more.....

Susanna said...

The Hapsburg group: Paul Manafort’s shadowy European network, explained

By Greg Walters Jun 15, 2018

Before he was Donald Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort was best known as a master strategist for some of the world’s most notorious dictators. But it was his turn resuscitating the career of once-disgraced Ukrainian politician Viktor Yanukovych that earned him the reputation as a political genius.

After devising a plan that won Yanukovych Ukraine’s presidency, an emboldened Manafort turned his attention to another herculean effort: repairing Ukraine’s foreign affairs and reputation abroad. And to do it he allegedly organized a shadowy network of former European politicians, dubbed the Hapsburg Group.

That plot, and that group, are now at the root of his current legal trouble with Special Counsel Robert Mueller. The former FBI head has accused Manafort of failing to register as a paid agent of a foreign government, while effectively promoting Ukraine’s interests in Washington. And more recently, he’s accused Manafort of trying to get those who knew about the Hapsburg Group to mislead investigators about its mission.

Now, Manafort’s fate hinges on the details of what he and the Hapsburg Group were really up to, and how far they went in polishing up Ukraine’s image abroad.

As Manafort heads to court Friday, the judge overseeing the trial has told Mueller it's time to disclose the identities of the members behind the elaborate scheme

It has been reported that Manafort is being held in solitary confinement FOR HIS OWN PROTECTION!!! One is reminded of the fate of the late Alexander Litvinenko who was poisoned in the UK.

Susanna said...

Another article that names names of Hapsburg Group members and how an attempt was made to conceal them.

Go deeper: The “Hapsburg group” targeted by Mueller investigation

A group of former senior European politicians who lobbied U.S. politicians as part of Paul Manafort’s unregistered foreign lobbying in the U.S. were identified by name this week in new filings from the Mueller investigation.

Why it matters: Manafort and his defense lawyers have said that the lobbying campaign was focused on just Europe, but some of the documents show members of the “Hapsburg group" attempted to influence the image of Ukraine’s president in the U.S. and that Manafort organized group members' visits to the U.S. to do so.

Show less

The Hapsburg group: Former Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi, former Austrian Chancellor Alfred Gusenbauer, former Spanish NATO head Javier Solana, Belgian Judge Jean-Paul Moerman, head of the German Federal Chancellory Bodo Hombach, according to ABC.
•Prodi, Gusenbauer, and Aleksander Kwasniewski, Poland’s president from 1995 to 2005, had all previously registered with the DOJ as lobbying in the U.S. for the Brussels-based European Centre for a Modern Ukraine , according to the Financial Times. Prodi, Gusenbauer, and Kwasniewski have each denied links with Manafort, per FT.

Be smart: Manafort has been accused of attempting to tamper with witness testimony along with a Russian aide, Konstantin Kliminck, through text messages. Some of the contents of the messages are revealed in the new filings, which show apparent efforts to convince people who worked with the Hapsburg group that the efforts focused on just the EU.
•Details: The filing named Alan Friedman and Eckart Sager, who were previously identified as Person D1 and Person D2, according to ABC:
•Manafort told Friedman, according to ABC: “We should talk. I have made clear that they worked in Europe."

The big picture: Manafort is facing a trial this fall on charges that he violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act after failing to register with the Department of Justice.
•Previous filings from Special Counsel Robert Mueller have alleged that Manfort illegally financed the group's operations.
•Rick Gates, who has pleaded guilty to conspiracy against the U.S. and making false statements to FBI agents and who worked on Trump's campaign as well, was also involved in the group’s lobbying efforts, per Politico.

Some of what happened:
•Prodi met with Rep. Ed Royce and congressional staffers in March 2013 as part of the lobbying, per Politico.
•Manafort reported some success as a result of the campaign, including preventing sanctions from being applied against Ukraine’s government.
•Some requests of the Hapsburg group came at the direct request of the Ukrainian government and Yanukovych, including making a call to a senator.

The goal, per one of Manafort’s memos: "The strategy for the first quarter of 2013 was to heavily engage with the UGS [sic] and US Congress, using a strategy I built called 'Engage Ukraine' which focused the dialogue on positive key issues, and away from" political rival Yulia Tymoshenko, who was imprisoned in 2011.
•Flashback: Mueller’s team described the group in February’s superseding indictment of Manafort as "a group of former senior European politicians to take positions favorable to Ukraine, including by lobbying in the United States.”

The intrigue: The names were revealed in a memo filed by the clerk un-redacted on Wednesday, but the memo was later re-filed in redacted form with those names hidden, per ABC. The un-redacted file was submitted with their names revealed inadvertently, according to CBS News.

One key quote: Mueller’s team called Manafort’s involvement in the lobbying "brazen efforts at corrupt persuasion.”

Susanna said...


Here is a fascinating albeit bizarre site I discovered that mentions the Hapsburg Group and Manafort and which might interest you. Note the reference to the "King of Jerusalem." This is not a reference to Jesus - but rather to the French Kings of Jerusalem.

The Habsburg Group
Posted on February 24, 2018


Former European leaders struggle to explain themselves after Mueller claims Paul Manafort paid them to lobby for Ukraine

Michal Kranz
Feb. 25, 2018

The "Podesta Group" also had ties to Manafort and the Ukraine caper.

Mueller’s investigation also indicates that another organization with a benign sounding name was then set up in Belgium to further smooth out damaged relations with the West: The European Centre for a Modern Ukraine.

The Centre hired U.S. lobbying firms Mercury LLC and Podesta Group, which have acknowledged connecting top former European politicians with Washington on behalf of the government of Ukraine — but denied knowing Manafort was behind the Centre.
READ: Paul Manafort, a mysterious Russian jet, and a secret meeting

Despite the elaborate facade, the “European Centre” has long been seen as a sham, according to the American lawyer for Tymoshenko who filed a lawsuit against Manafort and others in New York in the midst of all this turmoil.

“It was a Yanukovych front,” the lawyer, Kenneth McCallion, told VICE News. “I’m not sure there was even that much subterfuge involved when they set it up.”

The Hapsburg players

So far, three high profile former European politicians have been identified in federal filings as taking part in the “European Centre’s” lobbying efforts: former Austrian Chancellor Alfred Gusenbauer, former Polish President Aleksander Kwaśniewski, and former Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi.

On Wednesday, Mueller’s team made a rare slip when it briefly revealed the names of some more suspected participants in Manafort’s scheme.

The now redacted document alleges that a former Wall Street Journal reporter named Alan Friedman sent Manafort a memo in 2012 proposing “a small chorus of high-level European third-party endorsers and politically credible friends who can act informally and without a formal government relationship between now and the end of the year.”

Friedman wrote that he’d already spoken to Gusenbauer about the plan — and that Gusenbauer was game.

“Alfred Gusenbauer is willing to be discreet,” Friedman wrote. “In a just concluded telephone conversation today, he understood completely and embraced the idea of what he called ‘underground commenting.”’

READ: Manafort tried to Whatsapp his way out of a foreign lobbying violation

Gusenbauer allegedly asked for 30,000 euros a month.

The former Austrian chancellor, according to Friedman’s memo, also suggested a list of other names that might join the squad, including Belgian judge Jean-Paul Moerman, former German official Bodo Hombach, former senior EU and NATO official Javier Solana, and former French Prime Minister Alain Juppé. entire article...


Susanna said...


The Podesta Group was a lobbying and public affairs firm based in Washington, D.C. It was founded in 1988 by brothers John Podesta and Tony Podesta and has previously been known as Podesta Associates, and PodestaMattoon.
John Podesta left the firm in 1993, and Tony Podesta left the firm on October 30, 2017, after finding out about increased scrutiny of the firm. The firm most recently reorganized in January 2007 after current Chairman Tony Podesta split with former business partner Dan Mattoon.

Podesta Group represents American corporations as well as nonprofits and governments, and has "close ties to the Democratic Party and the Obama administration", although its CEO Kimberley Fritts was identified in 2015 by the group as "a fixture in Republican politics", having worked for former Florida Governor Jeb Bush. She resigned in November 2017 to establish her own firm, Cogent Strategies.

The firm reported earning US$27.4 million in lobbying fees in 2011. In 2007, Chairman Tony Podesta was ranked by his peers as the third most influential lobbyist in Washington.

On November 9, 2017, CEO Kimberley Fritts informed all employees that the Podesta Group would cease to exist at the end of the year. Employees were asked to clear out their desks and told that they may not be paid beyond November 15. On November 21, Podesta Group's website went offline being redirected to the personal website of Tony Podesta, with the majority of the Podesta Group’s former principals having joined Cogent Strategies, a new firm founded by Kimberley Fritts in November 2017.
The Podesta Group acted as a lobbyist for Egypt on US policies of concern, activities in Congress and the executive branch, and developments on the United States political scene generally, according to forms filed with the Department of Justice in 2009.

They also received $900,000 in revenue in 2011–2012 from the Brussels-based European Centre for a Modern Ukraine (ECMU), a group sympathetic to then–Ukraine president Viktor Yanukovych and his Party of Regions. As of October 2017, the Podesta Group is reported to be under investigation by Special Counsel Robert Mueller for potentially violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act in the course of its work for the ECMU. The Podesta Group was one of six lobbying firms that participated in a 2012–2014 public relations campaign organized by former Donald Trump presidential campaign chairman Paul Manafort on behalf of the ECMU and Ukraine's pro-Russian Party of Regions; the campaign was reportedly designed with the stated goal of improving Ukraine's standing among Western audiences as a possible prelude to Ukrainian membership in the European Union. A Podesta Group spokesman denied any wrongdoing. On October 30, 2017, a federal grand jury unsealed the indictment of Manafort and his deputy Richard Gates. According to NBC News, the Podesta Group is mentioned in the indictment as one of the companies that lobbied on behalf of the Ukrainian government for Manafort and Gates. On that day, Tony Podesta stepped down as head of the Podesta Group.

The Podesta Group also represented (as of 2016) the interests of Russia's largest financial institution, Sberbank of Russia, which controls approximately 30 percent of Russian banking assets...…..


Susanna said...


Note that the Podesta Group is tied in with the infamous Unranium One deal put together by Hillary Clinton and her cronies and by which 20% of our uranium reserves wound up being in Russias possession.

Firm Co-Founded By Hillary’s Campaign Chair Lobbies For Russia’s Uranium One

Chalk it up to a small world or to a tangled web, but Uranium One, the Russian-owned uranium mining company at the center of a recent scandal involving the Clintons and a close Canadian business partner, has lobbied the State Department through a firm co-founded by Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign chairman.

Senate records show that The Podesta Group has lobbied the State Department on behalf of Uranium One — once in 2012, when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, and once in 2015.

Uranium One paid The Podesta Group $40,000 to lobby the State Department, the Senate, the National Park Service and the National Security Council for “international mining projects,” according to a July 20, 2012 filing.

Clinton left the State Department on Feb. 1, 2013.

And according to a disclosure filed April 20, Uranium One spent $20,000 lobbying the Senate and State Department on the same issue.

The Podesta Group was founded in 1988 by brothers Tony and John Podesta. Tony Podesta now heads the group while John Podesta, who has not worked for the family business for years but has been involved in plenty of other projects, leads Hillary Clinton toward a Democratic nomination.

Uranium One is significant because it fell under the corporate control of Rosatom, Russia’s atomic energy agency, through a series of transactions approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department. Rosatom’s acquisition of Uranium One effectively gave Russia control of 20 percent of uranium in the U.S.

How all of that came to pass has fostered questions about how the Clintons operate their charity, the Clinton Foundation.

The Uranium One story starts in 2005 when Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra and several business partners came to own a small mining company called UrAsia Energy.

Clinton flew with Giustra in September 2005 on a private jet to Kazakhstan. There, the mining tycoon negotiated with that nation’s mining agency, Kazataprom, for rights to three mines. After Clinton appeared publicly in support of Kazakhstan’s president, Nursultan Nazarbayev, who had just allegedly won an election with more than 90 percent of the vote, the mining deal was approved.

Months later, Giustra donated $31 million to the Clinton Foundation with a pledge of $100 million more.

In 2007, UrAsia Energy, with its access to Kazakhstan’s lucrative mines, merged with South Africa’s Uranium One in a $3.5 billion deal.

Giustra sold his stake in the company soon after, pocketing a tidy profit. But other investors and executives with close ties to Giustra maintained their interests and donated millions more to the Clinton group.

As money was flowing to the Clinton Foundation, the State Department, which came under the control of Hillary Clinton in January 2009, approved a series of transactions that allowed Russia’s Rosatom to buy up shares in Uranium One. By June 2009, Rosatom had a 51 percent stake in the company.

With that majority hold, the Russian energy company effectively gained control of 20 percent of the uranium in the U.S.


Susanna said...


Rosatom has since taken complete control of Uranium One. And while there is little risk that the metal being pulled out of U.S. soil poses a direct threat to U.S. national security, it does give Russian President Vladimir Putin control of a major source of energy amid cooling diplomatic relations.

Though Uranium One’s corporate progression has the appearance of pay-for-play, the Clintons and Giustra have denied doing anything wrong. In his capacity as Clinton’s campaign chair, John Podesta has gone on the offensive, dismissing the notion that the Clintons have done anything illegal or unethical as a conspiracy theory.

But as evidence of just how complex the Clinton Foundation’s activities are, the website published an exhaustive list of 181 Clinton Foundation donors who also lobbied the State Department during Hillary Clinton’s tenure there.

Uranium One is not on the list. Neither is Giustra. Nor is Ian Telfer, one of Giustra’s Canadian associates who is the former chairman of Uranium One. He donated $2.35 million through his Fernwood Foundation to the Canadian wing of the Clinton Foundation, which is set up as a partnership with Giustra.

After it was revealed that the Clinton Foundation had not disclosed some of its foreign donations — such as Telfer’s — the organization announced it would be refiling some of its tax forms.

Susanna said...

Tucker: Source Says Podesta Brothers & Manafort, Not Trump, 'Central Figures' in Russia Probe

Susanna said...

I believe that the following has happened since this news report.

A top Democratic lobbying firm caught up in Mueller's Russia probe is on the verge of shutting down

Sonam Sheth
Nov. 12, 2017

Anonymous said...

George Lopez 'Pees' on Donald Trump's Hollywood Star
University of Minnesota to teach doctor to train abortionists
Parkland survivors sue the Coward of Broward!
Trump THREATENS to pull US out of NATO!
Ukip’s on the verge of a spectacular comeback – and it’s all thanks to Theresa May!

Anonymous said...


Immediate Attention: 7:49 PM

Highly deleteable inserted comment (2nd one from very beginning).

Anonymous said...

(Right above yours, which was originally 2nd.)

Anonymous said...

James Woods Drops the HAMMER on Peter Strzok!

..."The single greatest tragedy of the  Strzok Page dalliance of lust and treachery is the stain it splattered on a noble institution, the FBI. Thousands of hard-working and dedicated public servants (agents and staff) have been harmed irreparably by their antics and corruption."

Woods concluded:

“Peter Strzok loves the FBI,” his wife, AND his mistress. And he f*cked them all.”


Anonymous said...


Thanks for the spin. Few here think the pope is THE antichrist. AN antichrist, yes, very much so.

Any blog exposing New Age, New World Order, Global Government must include discussion on the catholic cult. Its very much central to those topics.

Anonymous said...

And, regardless of what someone's mother, or grandmother thought. They were simply wrong!

The person who puts family members opinions above Christ, is NOT worthy of Him!

Anonymous said...

Mexico’s new Left-wing president will “build a wall” along his country’s southern border to stop ILLEGAL immigration INTO Mexico!

07/11/2018 / By JD Heyes

Since Donald Trump came down the escalator at Trump Tower in New York City in June 2015 to announce he was running for president and promised to do something about “rapists and murderers” coming into our country from Mexico, he’s been hammered by the far Left for his stance on immigration.

But the criticism hasn’t just come from the American Left. No shortage of Mexican officials and citizens have also been critical of POTUS Trump’s promises to prosecute all illegal border crossers and to build a “big, beautiful fence” all along the U.S. southwest border.

Mexico’s newly-elected president, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, or AMLO, was also critical of the border wall. Yet now he’s committed to building a virtual border wall, so to speak, along his country’s southern and northern borders.

You can’t make this stuff up.

In an interview with Bloomberg, AMLO’s incoming security chief, Alfonso Durazo, said he and his boss will be building a new border police force aimed at interdicting illegal immigrants from Central and South America that have long used Mexico as a land corridor to the United States.

The idea is that the new force will act as a ‘wall’ to prevent illegal immigration, as well as drugs, weapons, and human trafficking into and through Mexico.

“We’re going to create a border police force that will be highly specialized,” Durazo said in an interview. “They need to apply the law.”

Yes, Left-wing America, even MEXICO has laws AGAINST ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION!

Anonymous said...

Lib Asks Man ‘When Was America Great,’ Gets 1 of Best Answers We’ve Ever Heard

JULY 12, 2018

When President Donald Trump announced on Monday evening that he had nominated Judge Brett Kavanaugh to serve on the Supreme Court, protests and counter-protests quickly broke out both in opposition and support of the nominee on the steps of our nation’s highest court.

One of the counter-protesters was a black man named Ricardo Caldwell who spoke with a reporter for Breitbart News about an interaction and conversation he’d had with one of the protesters who opposed Kavanaugh, President Trump and seemingly the nation of America as a whole.

Caldwell, who was wearing a red “Make America Great Again” cap, related how the woman he spoke with had asked pointedly “when was America great,” implying that the nation has never truly been “great” — typical tripe put forward by anti-American leftists.

The man’s answer to the protester’s snarky query was quite possibly better and of deeper substance than any heard by most of the supposed intellectuals and highly intelligent pundits commonly seen pontificating on cable news.

Caldwell first described how the protester barely even gave him an opportunity to answer her question about the message on his hat and instead seemed intent on provoking an emotional response instead of an actual dialogue.

“What she was talking about was slavery — I guess she feels that since I’m black I have to relate to slavery and that’s gotta be a ‘hot button issue,'” he stated.

“Never mind the fact that we have never been a slave, don’t know anyone (who’s been a slave) and I’m not a slave, of course,” he continued.

He pointed to his hat as he noted that she had asked “when was America great” and recalled that his answer had been: “America has been great from the very start because this nation was founded on the principles of freeing us from tyranny.”

“OK, there was slaves and so forth, but there were a lot of all colors — let’s say white — in this nation that did not feel like that was correct and this nation from that time has been moving out of tyranny, from bondage in one way or another, whether it be from Britain or whether it be from slavery as a whole,” he continued.

“In case she doesn’t know, there was a civil war, and in part … a whole lot of white people, if you look at history, died because they wanted this nation and people like myself to be free,” he added.

After taking a moment to compose himself as he spoke about his great love of this country, Caldwell stated, “Because this nation gives you the right to move yourself up out of any poor, bad position that you’re in like no other nation.”

“While some nations might step on you and say ‘hey, you’re gonna stay like that,’ or have the classism, we don’t,” he continued.

“What she’s saying about ‘this nation is horrible,’ basically saying ‘this nation is full of racists’ and I should be stupid enough to believe that when I’m sitting right here and see people who are nice of all colors that do things and work together, and this fool wants to take us back to a time when everybody hated each other,” he added.

This patriotic man hit the nail on the head with his response.

It’d be great if the so-called intellectuals and pundits who pontificate on all manner of America and America’s history would take note of this man’s answer and spend some time expounding on how our nation has always been great, and despite obvious and admitted shortcomings, we have continued to move past those issues and continue to make our nation greater all the time.

"Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you."

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 10:17

Spin or not, at least Susanna doesn't try to dictate to Constance how to run her blog or who should be allowed to voice an opinion. All she did was to PROVE that certain news about the Pope was fake news. Maybe you should go reread your Bible - especially where it says "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor."

Speaking of spin, thanks for all YOUR disinformation and spin.

That is what YOU are doing with the Bible and Bible prophecy. I know a few Protestants who might qualify for the role of "AN antichrist,".....and if ANYTHING looks like a New World Order/Global Government, it is the so-called "Millennium" ( a.k.a. hell on earth ) preached by these same wanna be "popes" in the cults over which they preside. Not only do they contradict Our Lord Himself Who clearly stated "My kingdom is not of this world," but such earthly millennial dystopias have been attempted before by people like Hitler, who called his Nazi regime "the thousand year Reich."

One last thing.....since this blog belongs to Constance, people like you, as guests, have no right whatsoever to tell her what she "MUST" discuss. Nor do you have the right to impose YOUR private views and interpretation of Scripture on everybody else. The only reason why you have been allowed your say here is because of Constance's forebearance.

That said, I would suggest that if you want to dictate what should - or should not be - discussed, then you should go start your own blog.

But the reason why you won't do that, however, is because, as we both know, you won't get too many takers. Easier to attempt to hijack the hard work of others like Constance and parasitically deploy it in the service of your own agenda than to allow your agenda to stand on its own.

Anonymous said...

'The Evil Face of the Deep State': The Disturbing Faces of Peter Strzok

Bizarre, Creepy Video Of His Smirking Goes Viral
'Help Me Mama!' Body Cam Shows Cops Mistake Autism for Drug Use, Attack & Taser Autistic Teen
WATCH: Cops Flip Coin to Decide on Jailing Woman for Speeding, Then They Kidnap Her

Anonymous said...


Always-On Listening Devices -- Soon EVERYWHERE...

Anonymous said...

NSA Specialists Contradict Rosenstein’s DNC “Russian Hacking” Claim

Anonymous said...

VERY Convenient Timing By Mueller, McCain & Co. To Try To Derail A Major U.S.-Russian Rapprochement Attempt By Trump (i.e. What a "SHOCK"...)

Congress To Trump: Cancel Putin Summit After New Mueller Indictment

Some in Congress are calling on President Donald Trump to cancel his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin following a Friday indictment resulting from the Russia investigation...

"If President Trump is not prepared to hold Putin accountable, the summit in Helsinki should not move forward," Sen. John McCain said...

Anonymous said...

Survival of the Richest:
The Wealthy Are Plotting To Leave Us Behind

By Douglas Rushkoff

Last year, I got invited to a super-deluxe private resort to deliver a keynote speech to what I assumed would be a hundred or so investment bankers. It was by far the largest fee I had ever been offered for a talk — about half my annual professor’s salary — all to deliver some insight on the subject of “the future of technology.”

I’ve never liked talking about the future. The Q&A sessions always end up more like parlor games, where I’m asked to opine on the latest technology buzzwords as if they were ticker symbols for potential investments: blockchain, 3D printing, CRISPR. The audiences are rarely interested in learning about these technologies or their potential impacts beyond the binary choice of whether or not to invest in them. But money talks, so I took the gig.

After I arrived, I was ushered into what I thought was the green room. But instead of being wired with a microphone or taken to a stage, I just sat there at a plain round table as my audience was brought to me: five super-wealthy guys — yes, all men — from the upper echelon of the hedge fund world. After a bit of small talk, I realized they had no interest in the information I had prepared about the future of technology. They had come with questions of their own.

They started out innocuously enough. Ethereum or bitcoin? Is quantum computing a real thing? Slowly but surely, however, they edged into their real topics of concern.

Which region will be less impacted by the coming climate crisis: New Zealand or Alaska? Is Google really building Ray Kurzweil a home for his brain, and will his consciousness live through the transition, or will it die and be reborn as a whole new one? Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system and asked, “How do I maintain authority over my security force after the event?”

For all their wealth and power, they don’t believe they can affect the future.

The Event.

That was their euphemism for the environmental collapse, social unrest, nuclear explosion, unstoppable virus, or Mr. Robot hack that takes everything down.

This single question occupied us for the rest of the hour. They knew armed guards would be required to protect their compounds from the angry mobs. But how would they pay the guards once money was worthless? What would stop the guards from choosing their own leader? The billionaires considered using special combination locks on the food supply that only they knew. Or making guards wear disciplinary collars of some kind in return for their survival. Or maybe building robots to serve as guards and workers — if that technology could be developed in time.

That’s when it hit me: At least as far as these gentlemen were concerned, this was a talk about the future of technology. Taking their cue from Elon Musk colonizing Mars, Peter Thiel reversing the aging process, or Sam Altman and Ray Kurzweil uploading their minds into supercomputers, they were preparing for a digital future that had a whole lot less to do with making the world a better place than it did with transcending the human condition altogether and insulating themselves from a very real and present danger of climate change, rising sea levels, mass migrations, global pandemics, nativist panic, and resource depletion. For them, the future of technology is really about just one thing: ESCAPE.

Anonymous said...

'Cancel the Putin meeting. Now.' Chuck Schumer demands

RayB said...

Anonymous said to another "Anonymous" @ 11:07 AM (in part):

"Speaking of spin, thanks for all YOUR disinformation and spin."

"That is what YOU are doing with the Bible and Bible prophecy. I know a few Protestants who might qualify for the role of "AN antichrist,".....and if ANYTHING looks like a New World Order/Global Government, it is the so-called "Millennium" ( a.k.a. hell on earth ) preached by these same wanna be "popes" in the cults over which they preside. Not only do they contradict Our Lord Himself Who clearly stated "My kingdom is not of this world," but such earthly millennial dystopias have been attempted before by people like Hitler, who called his Nazi regime "the thousand year Reich."

I found this to be a very entertaining post. What's hilarious is that this Anon equates belief in Pre-Millenialism with "Hitler" because he "called his Nazi regime "the thousand year Reich." Now, I for one do not believe the Bible teaches a literal thousand year reign upon this earth, which makes me an Amillenialst, a position held by virtually all the Reformers and mainline Protestantism up until the early 20th. century. BUT, in his/her "defense" of Constance and Susanna, this Anon doesn't realize that Constance, in all probability DOES believe in a literal 1,000 year reign upon the earth, so, in effect, this Anon is connecting Constance with the 3rd. Reich! ROFL !!!!

Anon, I think you owe Constance a sincere, heart felt apology.

paul said...

This matter is by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones: to the intent that the living may know that the most High rules in the kingdom of men and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men.

Anonymous said...

Heaven On Earth?


Anonymous said...

I think God sets up leaders/kings whatever, whos hearts are inclined to do right, when men hope, pray for and seek after righteousness, and goodness. But when the general populous, as today, seek to 'do their own thing', exercise themselves in the grossest perversions, and attempt to rid the earth of any thought toward, or acknowledgement of even the existance of a creator God, then, we get the basest leaders to match the majority of the people.

Anonymous said...

Nice try RayB, but YOUR spin won't fly either.

If anyone owes Constance an apology, it is people like you and the other anon...who have had the nerve to hijack this blog instead of starting your own and then disrespecting and denigrating the beliefs of Constance's other GUESTS who don't happen to agree with you. It is people like you who are making Constance look bad by making it look like Constance approves of such bigotry.

As for "Third Reich" thinking, if the shoe fits......

Anonymous said...

(Anybody NOT see this coming?)

May warns there could be 'NO Brexit AT ALL'...

Anonymous said...

7:20 P.M.

Theres no attempted hijacking this blog by catholis? Anytime there becomes too many posts exposing the preferred cult here, then Susanna starts with her ten mile long posts of fluff. Even OZ pops out of the hobbit house to add more fluff.

RayB gotcha, and now your whining!

Anonymous said...

Christians Perplexed as European Catholic Bishops Meet to Plan Pro-Muslim Migrant Media Offensive.html 7/14/18 post

Anonymous said...

Of COURSE: Mueller INDICTS 12 Russian military officers for 2016 election meddling just DAYS before Trump meets Putin

Special counsel Robert Mueller claims to be investigating a ‘conspiracy’ between members of POTUS Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Russian government. What is truly sickening about it is that  he’s one of them actually  in on a conspiracy — to undermine our duly-elected president.

On Friday, another co-conspirator, Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein, announced that Mueller has indicted 12 Russian intelligence officers for allegedly  meddling in the 2016 election.

And this comes just a few days before Monday’s face-to-face meeting in Helsinki between POTUS Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Timing is everything, right?
The disgusting Deep State’s military-industrial complex can’t have peace with Russia and China because it would wither and lose its power and influence. Much better to remain on a hair-trigger nuclear status with both countries so we can blow each to bits someday!

As for the indictment, Mueller can’t seriously believe that Putin is going to surrender 12 of his GRU officers to the United States for a sham trial…does he? Because he didn’t believe that 13 other Russians he indicted earlier were going to fight back in court — until they did. Discovery in that case is ongoing.

How do we know this is bogus? Let us count the ways:

#1 - WikiLeaks founder and editor Julian Assange has said repeatedly that Russia did not hack the DNC’s emails and has even promised to provide evidence of same in exchange for a pardon. Assange and WikiLeaks  have never been proven wrong or to have lied.

#2 - A group of former U.S. intelligence officials including some former NSA agents has said they have examined the cyber-forensic evidence and have concluded that the DNC servers were not hacked. What’s more, the DNC has never allowed its servers to be examined by the FBI’s cyber-forensics team; so how can Mueller  know that “Russian officers” hacked them?

#3 - Philip Giraldi, a former CIA counterterrorism expert, military officer and recognized intelligence authority, in a December 2016 Facebook post, said there is “no evidence” to support the Obama administration accusation Russia was involved in the DNC ‘hack.’ He wrote that “apart from assertions of Russian activity connected to an unnamed political party, [the report] provides absolutely no evidence that the alleged intrusions into the DNC servers were anything beyond normal intelligence agency probing for vulnerabilities.” “In fact,” he adds, “it doesn’t even provide the evidence for that.”

#4 - The Russian “counterintelligence” investigation into the Trump campaign was bogus. It was based on a phony “dossier” that  came in three different versions — none of which have been substantiated.

#5 - Never forget that James Comey leaked  classified memos in order to trigger Mueller’s appointment. The whole thing was a set-up; Hillary Clinton is the real criminal here but she was  exonerated so she could remain in the race and ‘beat Donald Trump’ — or so everyone thought.

That Jeff Sessions has allowed this clown show to continue is a disgrace. Like POTUS Trump said, a make-believe probe which is wasting tens of millions of taxpayer dollars is also preventing our president  from pursuing his vision of foreign policy, which is his right. As we have noted, that’s a national security threat.

At least he’s not trying to enrich a terrorist-supporting regime (Iran) while making “deals” that will someday lead it to nuclear weapons.

Someday the guilty will be made to pay. And POTUS Trump won’t be among them because the only thing he’s done is dare to run for the presidency…and win.

Anonymous said...
YouTube to start “fact-checking” news videos using dishonest, deep state-controlled Wikipedia disinfo...

RayB said...

To Anon @ 10:14 AM ...

I thought I might have been the only one that noticed that virtually every time the RCC is exposed for what it is, "Susanna" suddenly appears to post a tome of "copy and paste" material that is readily available for any that have an inquiring mind and a will to search Google.

I noticed too that, when I asked Constance for specific proof to substantiate her claim (Rick Wiles' 1st. interview) that the "New Age Movement knew that they couldn't advance their agenda while Benedict remained pope," she responded by claiming to remember a quote in Benjamin Creme's book that he said something like that about John Paul II. What that had to do with Pope Benedict, I don't know, but it certainly didn't answer my question.

Here is Constance's response to my request for proof regarding BENEDICT, and NOT John Paul II:

To Ray B:

What proof do I have that prominent New Agers said it would not happen as long as John Paul II was pope? It was in a Benjamin Creme book -- is that good enough? I'll have to locate it, but I clearly remember reading it. In early Benjamin Creme lectures he had bragged that "the Pope will bend his knee." But later, he dismayedly wrote that Pope John Paul II had said unkind things about them and that it wouldn't happen while he was pope.


10:13 AM

Anonymous said...

The government is now being forced to admit that it is LEGAL for 3D print gun designs to be sold online, in a landmark victory for the Second Amendment!

By Jay Syrmopoulos

July 15, 2018

Washington, D.C. – The U.S. Department of Justice reached a landmark settlement with the Second Amendment Foundation and Defense Distributed; an organization that promotes and distributes technologies to manufacture firearms at home with a 3D printer...

State Department Gives Up Case Against 3D Printed Gun Pioneer

DEFCAD is a free repository for small arms technical data. It was built to serve as a public good and an ongoing, standardized resource for the American rifleman and gunsmith.

Anonymous said...


At the very end of 'Paul Manafort, the Hapsburg Group, Javier Solana?' comments at 10:17 AM she posted a somewhat similar reply to you also about that matter.

Unknown said...

moncler outlet
michael kors outlet online
air max 90
dansko shoes
longchamp solde
cheap jordans
ralph lauren pas cher
dsquared2 jeans
burberry outlet
adidas trainers

Christine Erikson (aka Justina) said...

Dankenberg's an idiot.
Elijah's letter does not show he was taken to a place on earth, an angel or someone
an angel gave it to to deliver would have delivered it. Jesus said none had been to
the highest heaven except Himself (at that time), there are multiple layers of heaven,
Enoch was translated not died, so Enoch and Elijah went to a lower heaven.

The quote supposedly proving Elijah died DOES NOT SAY THAT, only that he had not been
made perfect yet. Perfection is not instant, but we work out our salvation in fear and
trembling says Paul.

Revelation doesn't say who the two witnesses are, they are treated like individuals
so are not the Church and Israel aka two lampstands (again no specifics) as some think.
Whether they are Elijah and Enoch or not is a matter of conjecture.

snopes is unreliable e.g.,
and however
the accusation sounds a bit unlikely

Pope Francis is not godly, neither was pope Alexander VI (Borgia) but that doesn't
make him THE antichrist just AN antichrist (John says there are many besides the
main one).
scroll down to the article section about Lockheed

Christ said "but now My kingdom is not from hence" and said elsewhere Hewould come back,
and the CREED ITSELF SAYS He will come back "and of His Kingdom there shall be no end,"

That said the milennium preachers have issues but only the dominionists claim the church
will build it, the original (and biblical) position was Christ would install it Himself
at His return.


The Acts 15 council says exactly what you deny it says, that they should not burden the
gentiles coming to Christ in any matter but only to abstain from blood (murder) fornication
(whoredom a general term covering allmanner of sexual evils incl. but not limited to adultery
and not about incestuous or otherwise illegal marriages only either the very word we get
pornography art of or about whores from. fornication being the latin version which is
slang, from fornax, arch because Roman brothels were usually in a basement with street
access through an arched door and steps down), thingssacrificed to idols, and things
strangled (like a chicken with neck wrung instead of head cut off, no exsanguination of
any kind and no blood added back into meat like blood sausage or McDonald's is said to do
this being from Noah not Moses)

WAY, what health is involved in not wearing clothing of mixed kinds of materials, or
in not sewing different kinds of seed in the same field? idiot. biblically illiterate.

ركن كلين said...

لذلك تحرص شركتنا شركة مكافحة حشرات بالرياض كأفضل الشركات الموجودة فى الرياض على التخلص من جميع الأفات الشرسه مثلا الفئران وغيرها من القوارض التى من الممكن ان تكون سبب فى تدمير اغراض اى منزل او قد تسبب بعض الامراض اونقلها.
1-شركة مكافحة النمل الاسود بالرياض
2-شركة مكافحة الصراصير بالرياض
3-شركة مكافحة الفئران بالرياض
4-شركة مكافحة النمل الابيض بالرياض
5-شركة مكافحة الحمام بالرياض
6-شركة رش دفان بالرياض
7-شركة رش مبيدات بالخرج

Gregory Finkelson said...

Great article! You have shared very good information. Thanks for sharing this post. For more information about immigration click here: Gregory Finkelson