 |
| Peggy Cuddy's Tree Chart of the New Age Movement |
Thursday, September 10, 2015
Dear Friends of ours urgently need our help -- Dennis & his mother Peggy Cuddy
This is a special and unusual appeal. I received a phone call from Lee Penn who called my attention to an unusual article on NewswithViews. The article was by reknown and respected researcher and writer Dennis Cuddy. Dennis has been diligently physically caring for his aging mother, Peggy Cuddy, now in her mid 90's. Peggy Cuddy, a brilliant and gifted researcher, raised her son right. Peggy Cuddy is the creator of the Tree Chart. If you want or need a copy of this chart, email me at cumbey@gmail.com with the subject line reading only Cuddy Chart and I will send you a printable pdf file that you can use in explaining New Age issues to others. If you read the linked article, you can see, as I did, that this was a serious cry for help from one of our dearest and most deserving friends. If you can help with their serious plight of the loss of already too scant income combined with the loss of their long time leased residence, please send generously what you can to: Dennis Cuddy, 1027 Saint Marys Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605-1232. Their situation is urgent. Also, if the residency issue and storage issues are not resolved, Dennis has invaluable papers and library from his many years of research (he is "Dr. Dennis Cuddy, Ph.D.). He has sacrificed so very much as many of us have to bring accurate information to us on the pressing New World Order issues of our time without over-sensationalizing and profiteering in the process. Now, they need our help and those of us keeping up with these issues are increasingly discovering that we need each other. I thank Lee Penn for calling this to my attention -- I had missed that NewswithViews posting. I did call Dennis Cuddy upon receiving the information. Dennis told me that indeed the situation is urgent, even critical. Let's give them our help, as much as we can afford. Dennis and Peggy would have done the same for us had the tables been turned.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
407 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 400 of 407 Newer› Newest»K
Could you give short version of why we need to learn about Rodney Atkinson. Great credentials and all that, but I need a starting point. The name is completely new to me. I really don't have a grasp of English politics. You must have had a reason for giving the information. That would help.
paul at 9:11
I reposted it on one of my blogs.
http://fightthenewage.blogspot.com/2015/09/the-political-side-to-new-age.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48EgCfdOR0w&feature=youtu.be
ascendancy of the scientific dictatorship technocracy. goes into occult philosophy origins.
Anon 2:04 I believe Rodney to be a quiet, well researched reporter. He has no celebrity status that I am aware of.
~ K ~
K, I mean, what is his main focus. Is he conservative primarily? Does he have any long term history ideas that we should consider? That's a lot of listening and reading to do without some kind of recommendation.
anon 9:49
in the time you've taken to try to do all this advance vetting, you could have listened to the video and read the link and made up your own mind.
No comment necessary until we see the response at the family conference in Phillie:
http://www.christianpost.com/news/franklin-graham-condemns-obamas-guest-list-for-papal-welcome-as-sinful-145711/
We expect this of Obama, now what can we expect of the Pope in addition to his Communist or Technocrat Climate agenda.
Anon 9:49pm - I haven't read any of Rodney's books so I can't personally recommend them - just pointing the way to his YouTube video and trying to show that he comes from an economic and political background. Sorry I can't be of more help to you.
Rodney came to my attention when I began looking deeper into the EU VAT on digital services and goods which was introduced in January of this year. Other countries outside of Europe have also introduced or are in the process of introducing similar digital taxes. Already I hear independant sellers saying that a single global tax payment system/office for payment of these collected taxes would be useful, instead of having to register with offices in multiple countries! Currently the EU VAT has no thresholds ... anyone selling a single digi in Europe would be caught under the new law. Indies are being driven under the umbrellas of the likes of Amazon, Etsy, Bandcamp, etc., who collect and handle the taxes. Others are geo-blocking services ... a grey area which the EU are trying to eliminate. The implications of this law on the smallest of businesses crept through the British Parliament approval system virtually undetected ... it was headlined as the 'Amazon Tax'. The EU laws trump our British laws.
There are plans to extend this taxation at customer nation rate (not seller nation rate) to tangible and physical goods, "soon". How soon, "soon" is we do not yet know.
~ K ~
Further reading on what's happening with taxes globally from Taxamo's Blog. Taxamo are based in Ireland and provide software solutions for businesses.
"Our global digital tax solution approach
The recommended approach to taxation on digital goods, according to the OECD, is to tax based on where the consumer is located rather than where the business is based.
As already illustrated a number of countries have implemented this approach and more are actively discussing potential rules at government level."
https://www.taxamo.com/digital-tax-worldwide-launch/
~ K ~
K,thanks. I'll read it but know it will be out of my league. I know who to make sure gets the information and I'll thank you now for them.
oh no, phoenix training and placement is back, this and some other used to post the same over and over in the earlier blog comments section like maybe ten years ago
took up lots of space. Is this a spam bot or some here figures the fighting isn't bad enough to jam things?
"extra dark details" time again, what the elites who run Britain and other places
are up to on their spare time.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/secretive-elite-oxford-society-centre-6485955
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/oxford-university-bullingdon-club-wed-4305702
this is the group the previous article mentions as tame by comparison.
"“Women aren’t allowed to formal dinners but at informal gatherings we would make them get down on all fours like a horse, whinny, and bring out hunting horns and whips. It was ridiculous.”
Unbelievably, he insists: “Yes they were degraded to some extent, but it was all done respectfully and the more they took, the more respect they earned. Half of them are godparents to my children now.”"
wrecked an Indian restaurant once for the fun of it.
"An insight into how Bullers felt they could get away with it comes from Riot Club star Booth.
The actor, who met members of old-school drinking clubs like Bullingdon for research purposes, says: “One person said to me that when they entered the dinner, they felt like they were going into Narnia.
"Leaving one world where your morals are and going through this door.
“And you’re protected by the club – the history of the institution, past kings, royalty from other nations. You have the best lawyers. Surely, you’re invincible.”"
"Carly Fiorina, whose birth name is Cara Carleton Sneed, claims that she started as a secretary and heroically rose to become a CEO of Hewlett Packard. Republican candidates seeking to dupe their gullible supporters and mask their dubious personal backgrounds often tout this typical Horatio Alger rags-to-riches story. Carly Fiorina is no exception to this pattern however her personality is saturated with this lie and many others as well as exhibiting signs of insanity that only comes from being attached at the hip to the intelligence establishment.
Fiorina’s father was Joseph Tyree Sneed, III who would become the dean of Duke University School of Law, a Deputy Attorney General, and a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Readers are reminded that the only judicial level higher than the circuit appellate court is the Supreme Court; this would make Carly’s father an incredibly influential and well-connected individual. Carly went to the posh all-girls Channing School in London and then to Stanford University. It is likely that Carly’s story of starting as a humble secretary came as a result of her father pressuring her to taking up a job with Kelly Girls, which she did during the summer as a student at Stanford. After dropping out of law school at UCLA and she moved on to business school and then to her well publicized career as an asset stripper and wrecker of companies like Lucent and Hewlett-Packard.
It was allegedly only after the board of directors at Hewlett-Packard fired her that Carly came into the orbit of the intelligence community, but some are skeptical. She had previously provided servicehttp://tarpley.net/carly-fiorina-unmasked-as-top-spook-pathological-liar-and-protegee-of-nsa-and-cia-boss-hayden/s for the Pentagon through an unpaid position on the Defense Business Board."
https://visionthought.wordpress.com/2010/09/24/occult-practices-of-the-american-political-establishment/
the article focuses on Lincoln and Reagan, though there was more to the latter than astrology but I forget the details and while it mentions hoodoo in the south, does not deal with the occult connected Knights of the Golden Circle that helped create
the Confederacy. Pike of course is infamous as a Confederate officer and mason
http://jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/occult_theocracy.htm
"The Idea that American elite and corporations helped bring Hitler to power is a far cry from the ‘fairy tales’ we are taught in school. Most Americans will have a great deal of trouble digesting this information and some will reject it outright and make no further inquiries, out of fear of discovering the depth of their own deception. Nevertheless, I will however, seek to enumerate information found in hard to find government documents and how this information is relevant to us today. I shall attempt to do this by explaining the results of Occult influenced government in history and shed some light on many of the trends we see today.
The role of Secret Societies in 20th century politics is an interesting one which‘ I will discuss to some degree later. First, I would like to discuss the Anti-Christian viewpoints of Adolph Hitler and their Occult origins. Borrman, one of Hitler’s henchman had an assistant who used to record many of Hitler’s mentally unbalanced diatribe’s. May I give you an example? ...
“Christianity is the greatest setback in the history of mankind, The most sever blow that mankind has ever endured is Christianity; bolshevism is the 'bastard' son of Christianity.” "
Christine
There are endless unscholarly websites about Hitler and the world of high finance, but one book at least is well researched and sourced: Antony Sutton's "Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler". It has been placed online here:
http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/index.html
Dear Christine, this is Physicist. Normally I identify myself only in comments relating to physical science here, but you posted at 3.33pm about secretive societies at Oxford University. I was at Cambridge which is pretty similar. The Bullingdon and Piers Gaveston societies at Oxford (you refer specifically to the Gaveston) and the Pitt Club at Cambridge were essentially dining and drinking clubs at which the sons of the wealthy met to drink too much in each other's company and occasionally indulge in mild vandalism. For those reasons they do not publicise themselves and do not welcome the attentions of the media, but I know personally people who were involved, I have dined in the Pitt Club at the invitation of one such, and I can tell you that these are definitely not occult societies dedicated ruthlessly to the furtherance of their members in finance and public life afterwards. If there are counterparts of Yale's Skull and Bones at Oxford and Cambridge then they are a lot better hidden.
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6549/pope-dream-totalitarian
"but her gossip does not lend itself to getting the truth told and understood, with proper information and warning." blah, blah, you take the information and fit it into the grid you are building. warning? if I have to advise you not to engage in orgies with classy guys in England you got more problems than I can deal with.
Physicist,
the occult issue wasn't the issue, though if you look close enough you will probably find an overlap in the foundation. there is an underpinning of occult philosophy involved in most things English.
the issue was depravity of elites. The activities remind me a little of the old
hellfire clubs, and the practice of "young lords" of the 1700s of "tipping the lion." This was to grab some hapless homeless person, drag him or her into an alley, stick a spreading device in the mouth, and rip the ends of the mouth open in a permanent horrible grin. A similar effect by cutting the Glasgow Grin was also done to what are called "snitches" now.
Of course this extreme form is lacking. the main theme of the hellfire clubs was drinking dining and irreverence which included black masses excused by later generations of relatives as a "joke," but that is no excuse. This kind of attitude, including "mild vandalism," may remain harmless in terms of extent of damage done, no sexual escapades and no blasphemy, but the atmosphere with that description of the sense of being in another world is precisely what lays the groundwork for the rest. out of that population a smaller group can be led and out of them a still smaller group that goes the rest of the way.
that you dismiss all this so lightly without even referencing the sexual and parasexual (e.g., flogging) stuff to affirm or deny just sidestep it, tells me something about your own superficiality which is dangerous to your spiritual condition.
"if I have to advise you not to engage in orgies"
Your "crystal ball" is in need of an overhaul, you poor ridiculous soothsayer (LOL!) of the blog.
And exactly who asked you for advice or exhortation of any kind on this subject?
No.Body. No one.
You go fishing in the sewer everyday all day and night long.
The more juicy the gossip (or even if true, it does deserve the airplay you give?) you make sure the collective face of everyone is rubbed in it, providing and proving nothing beyond what we need to know (thank you, Constance for doing that), but only to sensationalize. Your mind's diet is putrid, hovering over nasty and rotten things like a vulture.
This is a tactic of the devil to delve and divulge in the manner that you do.
You help him out immensely.
anon 12:10
if stipulating the existence the proclivities of something is a great temptation to you to go forth and do likewise as them, I suggest you skip the articles.
To 9:35 a.m.
Are you blessing Catherine Austin Fitts and her clear and close relationship with long time convicted of murder New Age guru Ira Einhorn, the MOST VISIBLE FIGURE at the original Earth Day in 1970? There are serious problems with the Pope, for sure, but if you can't see the evil in Ira Einhorn's plain pronouncement that "psychopaths like myself emerge when it is time for societies to change," I have to wonder what your personal agenda is? I have to wonder if you are not playing into the Alice Bailey- Peter LeMesurier strategy of pitting target groups against each other after first infiltrating all target groups to the hilt!
Constance
Physicist,
I would be very grateful if you would take the time to share your views here on the LHC. There have been a lot of Youtube videos made recently about the current activities going on in Switzerland at the moment and as a layperson I would greatly appreciate your input on same.
Inter alia, Catherine Austin Fitts was a honored speaker at the 13th Annual IONS (Institute of Noetic Sciences) conference in 2009 along with Luisah Teish (one of Matthew Fox's favorite voodoo practitioners), Larry Dossey and others. The Conference theme? TOWARD A GLOBAL SHIFT: SEEDING THE FIELD OF COLLECTIVE CHANGE. She is obviously considered one of the New Age seeders in very good standing, but that doesn't bother 9:35!
Constance
What is the LHC? If you use an acronym, please take the time to spell it out for the rest of us. Thank you!
Constance
Sorry about that Constance.
LHC = Large Hadron Collidor at CERN.
Recently I started saying a prayer every morning for all Watchmen (and Watchwomen), including specific names like Constance, Dorothy, Dennis Cuddy, and others I know of, or know personally, asking God to grant them strength, protection, discernment, encouragement, and practical help as needed to each one's situation. I have also been praying for Anthony Patch who has kept the watch vis-à-vis CERN and has been facing difficult times (he is apparently back according to a recent Doug Hagmann blog). These are people on the front lines. I hope others here will join me in this effort and add this intention to their daily prayer intentions, as I feel there is an urgent need.
May the Lord bless and protect all of those who keep faithful watch and who have paid such a great price over many years to do so.
Constance,
I am not blessing anything merely excusing youthful stupidity and the gullibility that can come when you realize the nature and capability of the enemy.
yes she is NEw Age and I warned about this problem. the ISSUE IS FACTS THAT ARE DIRT ON ADMINISTRATIONS AND CURRENT POLICIES.
I don't subscribe to solari precisely because I don't like her associates (including and especially Farrell, who has gone apostate, but that has no bearing on his expertise in Nazi history and infiltration and so forth to the present time.)
are you blessing the NEw Agers you had lunch with or whatever and they whose information you use to show the kind of dirt your radar is out for?
obviously not.
the new age "spirituality" which in a better time generations ago would be recognized as a kind of mental illness is all over the map now, we have to live with it. one prosecutor said, "conspiracies hatched in hell don't have angels as witnesses" regarding jailhouse informants and suchlike.
Often people who expose someone's misdeeds have plenty of their own, and that has no bearing on the value of the intelligence on others they provide. you do have to watch out for an agenda. The problem with association with Einhorn is that he is a psychopath and such have a great sensitivity to the inclinations and subtle signals of others and their feelings contrary to the myth of no empathy. they USE this information to control or harm others or profit off them then dump them more easily. it is not lack of awareness it is lack of caring lack of morals.
I am not proposing anyone associate with Fitts, merely that the information on the economic hijinks she found in HUD and later should be looked at.
merely limiting your sources to hard core Christians doesn't mean you won't find either incompetence, lack of credible (from not being on site when it happened like she was) information or lack of corruption problems on their own. I am pretty sure there is a hypercharismatic on board here for instance which is just another brand of New Age, even if it denounces obvious occult practices and emblems.
Einhorn exploited legitimate complaints early in his career, then when busted exploited exposures of measures government rogue elements have used to gain credibility.
there is nothing more persuasive than an organized type psychopath. and you probably rub shoulders with them in public life and have probably voted for them. if you want to go looking for them, troll among military command levels, elected officials, some unelected state department and similar power situations, doctors, and clergymen. these categories tested highest on psychopath indication tests, and being positions of power over others are a natural group of professions to gravitate to.
Fitts is one of those people who has good bait you want to slip without springing the trap, buying into her spiritual solutions or some of her lets work with mister global type solutions.
the latter might reflect her having struck a deal to save her hide, or been attracted to them in the first place. there is so much dirt revealed now that their best approach is to control the opposition (already in play), control the kind and amount of release of information and muddy the waters with sensationalistic garbage like Hagmann and Hagmann and Quayle and others, or put forth people who will say, "yeah this is bad let's work with it" when it is way too early to take that approach instead of trying to destroy them. Fitts could well be a case in point. which doesn't make the objective facts she presents less valuable.
david icke was breaking ground in his exposure of elite pedophile networks, but he is an example of someone who thinks new age and its love peace bliss stuff is a solution to predation of all kinds. it isn't. it facilitates it.
then he was sidelined with the reptile thing. it took a while for sounder people to expose pedophile networks without having new age baggage and gullibility themselves.
if people here can't use discernment then indeed they should stay away from everything and wait for the "safe" sources that won't tempt them to reveal the dirt. and kick themselves for who they voted for during the interim.
should have put commas around that won't tempt them or written that won't tempt them and will reveal the dirt. I apologize for the extra post here but once when I deleted to edit I was accused of having posted obscenity on the deleted post.
The LHC is just an enormous physics experiment. There is nothing New Agey about it at all; those things (and the name "God particle") come from irresponsible popularizers and journalists. It does relate to quantum theory which some people wrongly think has connections with human consciousness, but that argument is no better than "here are two things we don't understand; let's posit a link". Regular physicists, including the overwhelming majority who
would work at CERN, don't think like that.
Physicist
physicist,
of course it is an enormous physics experiment. regarding possibilities some Christian analysts fear might open a portal to another realm. Something is seriously
wrong with the designers of the housing, since it has destroyer false god shiva in front and a disguised triple six emblem. far more so than the triquetra.
the overwhelming majority mean nothing. they are merely persuaded by a minority who need only include one or two who have a hidden agenda they don't talk about to the rest of them.
atheism of course is de rigeur for scientists anyway, which is a problem in itself.
Physicist,
Thanks for your reply. The terms I have heard that refer to the New Age are "dark matter" and "anti-matter" and its link to the preternatural realm.
If you have listened to any of Anthony Patch's presentations about CERN I would appreciate your take. He is a Christian layman (not a professional scientist) but seems to be a physics autodidact. If you think he is talking bunk I would appreciate hearing your view. I would never dismiss an autodidact because some of the smartest, most knowledgeable people I know never finished college. Patch was on the John B Wells's show recently sounding dire warnings.
I don't you fully understand what some people are concerned about here, for instance you were showing how there is nothing occult about holograms. of course there is nothing occult about them IN THEMSELVES. the problem is could they be used to further an occult agenda by giving false pictures that persuade large numbers of people that something is happening that isn't happening? that is the point Constance made in A PLANNED DECEPTION and that is the only point anyone worried about this technology has ever made as far as I know.
not the NATURE of holograms, the possible MISUSE of holograms.
Christine,
"the occult issue wasn't the issue, though... there is an underpinning of occult philosophy involved in most things English."
Don't generalisations like that do you more discredit than the English?
Which people founded the USA seeking religious freedom, by the way? Which people made the Balfour declaration to enable the Jews to return to their ancient land? Which empire eventually abolished slavery on moral grounds?
"the issue was depravity of elites. The activities remind me a little of the... practice of "young lords" of the 1700s of "tipping the lion." This was to grab some hapless homeless person... and rip the ends of the mouth open."
Yes, and if the Bullingdon, Gaveston and Pitt Clubs start behaving like that then it is time to worry. When they merely form an orderly queue to vomit into a public trashbin (as a friend of mine witnessed) and occasionally trash a dining room (invariably paying willingly for the damage once sober) then there are more important things to worry about.
"that you dismiss all this so lightly without even referencing the sexual and parasexual (e.g., flogging) stuff to affirm or deny just sidestep it, tells me something about your own superficiality which is dangerous to your spiritual condition."
Thank you for your advice.
Physicist
that last post was addressed to Physicist. I forgot to add, that the initials CERN (and they could have chosen some other name that gave different initials) are a form of the name cernunnos the horned one. by itself that can be shrugged off. but combined with everything else, I must assume a satanic agenda is in play, that doesn't mean it will work. either these people at the top are overestimating the physics paranormal overlap, or God will not allow it to work beyond normal physics particle production.
I have long thought that many subatomic particles do not exist in nature, but are the product of catastrophic events to atoms. whether in an atom smasher or in similar events out in space.
Physicist,
England and USA have been infected for lack of a better term for centuries. religious freedom was promoted and exploited from the start of the Reformation by occultists wanting freedom for their own reasons.
No, it is not time to start worrying when those clubs start tipping the lion it is time to start worrying BEFORE that happens. to stop it early. to prevent it.
Their behavior includes unchastity and in the case of whatshisname putting his penis in a dead pig's mouth as part of an initiation ritual, which means all members have done this initiation means how you get into the group.
given the revelations about pedophile networks and pervert networks among the elite, this kind of socializing is exactly what facilitates it. I am sure the comparatively harmless networks such as those drinking clubs and the nastier ones overlap.
Physicist,
Sorry to bombard you with more questions and please accept my apologies in advance if I am trying your patience!
There is a 1/2 hour or so video on Youtube with an interview by a man named Michael who claims substantial knowledge of CERN. Several people have created videos from the interview. You can find it by searching the terms CERN and destruction of souls. This man is a Christian, like Patch, and talks about antimatter and its links to the demonic realm. If you have time I would greatly appreciate if you would listen to it and give your feedback on what he says. I don't know if this man is a physicist, but as a layperson I found his presentation of the material to be credible. Obviously, a professional physicist like yourself would hear it very differently.
Thank you in advance!
Dear 3.33pm,
Anti-matter is just matter with some of the quantum numbers reversed in sign. It can be created only in particle accelerators and when matter and antimatter meet they annihilate and produce energy (photons) according to E=mc^2. It might be the main form of matter in some parts of the universe.
Dark matter is a hypothesized form of matter that does not interact with regular matter via the most common forces of nature (so hard to detect) and presumed to exist to account for large-scale behaviour of the universe according to Einstein's theory of gravity. Do look it up on Wikipedia. There's nothing New Agey about it, just an unsolved scientific problem because this is where the research frontier is today.
I'm glad you gave me the option of ticking a "talking bunk" box about Anthony Patch. I hardly know where to start correcting the errors of fact in what he says.
Physicist
Christine,
Well you worry about rich Oxford drunks while the rest of us get on with learning about and combating the New Age.
Physicist
Dear 3.45pm,
Sorry I don't want to drop 30 mins watching Michael but your description is enough to go on... the demonic is SPIRITUAL whereas matter and antimatter are both MATERIAL. There is a basic ontological confusion in this stuff according to what you say.
Physicist
Physicist,
thank you for that clarification about dark and anti matter. I had to do this in comments on a rev. Begley interview with some character who by terms used was a mason and presented a view that dark matter is evil and that it supposedly has the same signature as life so things are made of it, and the idiot pastor couldn't spot the essential gnostic heretical and/or closet satanist propaganda in that one.
regarding the spiritual vs. the material, there is some overlap since "manifestations" occur involving scratches and more extreme stuff. HOWEVER these guys running CERN may have way over estimated it.
Physicist,
If you would provide more detail on your debunking I would be grateful. Anything you could say that would shed light would be helpful.
One way Patch explained if(I paraphrase here) was that the LHC is trying to do using technology what occultists have done for centuries using magic (occult rituals). I've studied the New Age for many years - thanks in no small part to Constance, Dorothy, and the excellent commenters who have come and gone here (mostly gone, sadly, I'm afraid...but I digress) - and when I listened to Patch so much of what he said made sense. He talked about Tesla's involvement with the occult and drew links between that and the design of the LHC.
Again, thanks in advance.
I am studying Anthony Patch videos now. thanks for the reference, what I have heard so far is vague.
MCE has that distinct Larry Flynt magic to lend to this blog, that goes along nicely with her occultic leanings.
Constance is this ok with you, because this seems way beneath the blogs purpose...??..
MCE does not expose the new age as you do, she exposes her filthy mind meanderings.
I've learned a good number of important things from Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow quite a while back, that I see only unfolding more to see as time has passed, but this Erikson woman mostly fills your blog with useless "stuff" and pornographic mental pictures as filler and fodder of the basest kind.
This comments section was once teeming with information to further us in uncovering the many agendas of the new age movement, but now it is a freak show.
Christine,
This is the first and only time I will ever address you directly at this blog. I have zero interest in anything you have to say about CERN. My questions are directed solely at Physicist, who holds a PhD in the subject of Physics. To this end, please show some consideration for others and bow out of this discussion effective immediately.
anon 4:07
I have directed my remarks to physicist. it is not your place to tell anyone to get out of a discussion on a public blog comments section where there is no private communications option button or anything. or a separate chat room.
Says the biggest rudest foulest occultic blog abuser of all time!
anon 4:06
everything I post has to do with the New Age big picture, which is beyond mere obvious Nazi revival and beyond the silly effort to identify the antichrist which has failed for several hundred years of this effort by many people, some of whom as groups point at each other. everyone has a piece of the puzzle, Constance revealed a very big piece, which may or may not have a role in the antichrist's game or in getting him into power when he does come, but is a SERIOUS DEADLY SPIRITUAL EVIL THAT NEEDS TO BE FOUGHT.
that some new agers balk at extermination or violence doesn't make the potential results given mass hypnosis less violent. even if that is prevented, the infiltration of churches and warping of basic psychological health (a lot of "illumination" used to be recognized as schizophrenia) concepts, and twisting of doctrine and encouraging of states that promote spiritual deception is if anything worse than overt recognizable persecution with guns.
Physicist,
I understand your point when you say, "Sorry I don't want to drop 30 mins watching Michael." If possible, however, I would be very interested in hearing your take on what might motivate someone to distort the science in such a way. I listened closely to the interview and to Patch's and both seemed, to my hears at least, to have very solid Christian testimony. Classifying information as falling into the category of credible fact, misinformation, or disinformation can be very difficult. If you have some free time and could listen to the interview with this in mind I would be eager to hear your take on it. As far as I know, no Christian physicists have come forth to dispute these interviews which are making the rounds.
If I am being too pushy here please accept my apology!
4:13
You sure have got that right! I have felt for a long time that if people would ignore her she would leave. This is why I skip over all her posts and ignore her. If people didn't give her the attention she appears to seek she would leave. I sure wish she would, since this blog over the years has had many brilliant people come and go who have so much to say.
Anons 4:13pm and 4:30pm ... I hear you and wish along with you! :)
I used to learn so much here from folks who posted in comments. Had it not been for Constance and them, I would be in the dark to much of what's happening in our times ... both new age infiltrations and false prophets.
Thank You to All who previously posted here and helped me to keep my eyes fixed on Jesus, His way and His truth.
~ K ~
K,
Some of these folks still lurk. Rich Petersen and Dave in CA posted awhile back. I wonder if Craig, peacebringer, Mariel, Bella, etc. are still out there. Susanna, Dorothy, and Physicist come in from time to time, thank God. Yes, so much great learning could be found here in previous times.
If people would ignore MCE instead of capitulating to her she would either leave (eventually) or clean up her act.
Sad to say ignoring her has never worked.
She runs afoul of whatever is decent and considerate to communicate among civil people.
The truth is her biggest casualty.
She truly lacks peace and quiet in her own soul and it pours out of her streaming posts, coming from her root of bitterness (Hebrews 12:14,15) no matter how much bible spin she tries to put on it, so why would she be at peace with others?
Only Constance can rid this blog of her.
She is toxic and parasitic.
She has found her host and she ain't budgin'.......
"Sad to say ignoring her has never worked"
Has it ever been tried for any length of time? Let's say starting immediately, everyone ignore her completel going forward, except for Physicist (who will possiblyy want to clear up whatever distortions she is peddling today about physics). Then at an agreed date, say 31 October, we regroup and, if she is still around, reevaluate? I volunteer to post a reminder whenever I lurk (which isn't every day, but usually 2-3 times per week) and maybe a few others could also post reminders about this.
She'll outlive that, especially since you've told her the timeline.
Sorry it's true, but you are right. She deserves to be ignored completely.
Anons - too often, the language, imagery, assumptions and insinuations are really quite vulgar here in the comments. It's not at all helpful to learning and building each other up and a far cry from, "Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable--if anything is excellent or praiseworthy--think about such things." Philippians 4:8.
Indeed, I remember those folks and others ... what they shared made sense and has helped me and mine, enormously over the years.
~ K ~
5:39,
I'm the one who suggested the "Ignore MCE" experiment. I don't really care what she does - we have no control over it. What we do have control over is ourselves. Why are we letting her continue to dictate the frame here? This is a blog dedicated to exposing the New Age movement. Why don't we ignore her and focus on what the blog is supposed to be about? She either self-corrects or whistles in the wind. I have been skipping over her posts for months now and it gets easier. The only problems we can correct ourselves are (1) people keep taking her bait and (2) good people have stopped posting except occasionally. If we do the first it will create room for the second to occur.
5:45 - Collapsing comments is good ... Constance recommended that a long time ago, and it's something that's become easier for me to remember to do ... not only easier but essential!
Physicist - Thanks for your comments on CERN. Not being a science minded thinker, I appreciate your posts.
~ K ~
This is Physicist. Re Patch and Michael I simply think that they are confused and confusing and don't understand physics. I am glad of their faith in Christ. I do think that there is a lot of irresponsible popularising of physics that throws in a New Age slant today to try to get the general population interested, because the authors know that the public is somewhat New Age nowadays and because phrases like "the god particle" are snappy and get people's attention. Perhaps Patch is picking up on that. The Large Hadron Collider simply plays pool with elementary particles at the speed of light and sees what happens when they collide, at higher energies than any previous particle accelerator. It is so high in energy that the mess when particles collide is at a temperature equivalent to that in the universe an incredibly short time after the Big Bang (which I for one believe took place - it is HOW God created the universe "in the beginning"). None of this has more to do with demons than any other physics experiment. NB I am happy to answer questions in principle but am about to go away for 5 days.
Physicist,
I was under the understanding that the Big Bang was/is settled science, as opposed to a theory. Isn't the background radiation which you mentioned, essentially proof of the Big Bang?
I thank everyone who has still stayed around. When you post something of value, I pass it on outside the blog. Recently I did so with the tax information coming out of England which was shared. It was appreciated. I no longer use my name when posting here because the blog has become an embarrassment. So much silliness is posted here it makes anyone starting to check out New Age think mostly oddballs find the topic of interest. Different points of view can be informative, but too many could be described as off-the-wall speculative and send the wrong picture. It takes a lot of patience to go through many, many posts to find nuggets of helpful information.
Physicist, you give the blog some dignity. The Smithsonian magazine just did a short piece on the CERN Laboratory and gave this link. Outreach.web.cern.ch/outreach I can't get past opening remarks on some kind of occult connection when the presenter sounds so childish and the website is known for disinformation.
http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/blog/?p=17941
A Serious Look at Richard Foster’s “School” of Contemplative Prayer
By Ray Yungen
All the details show that essentially with contemplative prayer you are mostly
talking to yourself, not to God.
Anon. 4:24,
I couldn't agree more with you when you said: "Classifying information as falling into the category of credible fact, misinformation, or disinformation can be very difficult."
I found the following video quite interesting in describing what disinformation is, and how enemies can use it to deceive. I found it while trying to find out more about Natalie Grant Wraga, an expert on disinformation. Because of the nature of her work, there's not much to find!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwi36n0JLdM
We need a Natalie Grant here.
Marko
Thank you for the Natalie Grant link. I will watch that over the weekend.
Dorothy has given very good primers here over the years on disinformation and the New Age movement but it's been a while. Hopefully she will take the time and give another detailed review of the topic.
little problems here and there.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:KWq4xm7F1JgJ:www.libertytothecaptives.net
Miracle II Expose
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:xhhmBP5ycWMJ:libertytothecaptives.net
Stan Monteith and spiritual compromise
the problem I see with this product, is two things.
first using ash based on cayce information or anything based on his information, is kinda using fruit
of the poisoned tree. While much of his medical revelations seemed to have been being worked on
independently of him already, and it was like he or his demon guides picked their brains and put the
information in cayce's mind, the information coming to someone from cayce is like, well, I'd rather
boycott that source.
secondly, while there is something to be said for reichian orgone which has some disinct physical
qualities and technological directability, this eloptic energy is stated as prayer directed, that the
product has been charged with eloptic energy by prayer.
at that point you got God knows what contaminant is piggy backing. if something is charged by
prayer I don't want it. church made Holy Water excluded from this caution.
that is why I won't deal with homeopathy. the theory makes sense charging the water with the
signature of something makes sense, except.....this charging is done by shaking done by someone,
and if by a machine perhaps the whole thing is overseen by believers in this and the machine made
by them. the possibility of something else being in the picture exists.
"Dr. Stanley Monteith - CNP Membership Directory (1996, 1999). Author, AIDS: The Unnecessary Epidemic; publishes, HIV-Watch, a nationally circulated newsletter covering the HIV epidemic; spends three hours daily on talk radio in California. Host of Radio Liberty.
On August 17, 2009, Stan Monteith went public with his personal belief that Christians have been deceived through the New Covenant/New Testament. Also that Christianity has been teaching the lie that the Lord Jesus is God, that there is no Trinity, that there is no Holy Spirit, but a 'Hailey Spirit' which is the feminine part of God who comforts us and is calling us back to her bosom. Agreeing with his guest, Craig Winn, "we have been deceived by the writings and agenda of that imposter of the true assembly, the man Paul who poisoned and corrupted the Scriptures by corrupting the Hebrew and Greek, especially through the book of Galatians." Stan's commented, "I've always questioned Paul's writings. and so did Thomas Jefferson." " http://watch.pair.com/database1.html
any truth to this?
http://www.apologeticsindex.org/t27.html The blasphemy Network.
yeah he could be very nice I'm sure and speak against obvious
technical occultism like using tarot cards and obvious witchcraft.
TBN's own brand was another matter.
http://conspiracytheorytruth.com/cern/
interesting. take everything with a grain of salt, and granted that logo could just
be a description of paths of particles but....that's a good excuse for this. while parts of it look like a 9 not a 6, you can three sixes by rotating without inverting some of it.
the quoted person Sergio Bertolucci is listed at CERN as Director for Research and Computing http://home.web.cern.ch/about/structure-cern
my take on this - maybe the conspiracy theories are true, but that doesn't mean the plan will work.
Another deleted post, that one information about the article on CERN Laboratory in the Smithsonian magazine and the link to it found there. It's those kinds of shenanigans that keep this blog operating at Christine's level of knowledge. Face it folks. We aren't supposed to learn anything valuable about the New Age movement. We are mushrooms, kept in the dark and fed manure. Now the big question is why.
that video includes the confusion between dark matter and anti matter. But the issue of peculiar events at CERN is something so far I haven't confirmed. yeah,
anti matter has to be contained or it blows up when it hits an equal amount of regular matter, but these are teeny tiny events. Hawking is worried about physical
effects, others about psychological mass effects. But setting aside that confusion and looking at the possibility of breaching some dimensional barrier is worrisome.
sometimes old dreams are hard to shake, some hope wrongly in some kind of indwelling God e.g., Henry Makow, whose page would be approved by many here
or some of it would be. "I prided myself on having escaped the banker's Communist hoax but I realize now that Communism was the "plan" for my parent's generation. I fell hook-line-and-sinker for the "New Age", which was aimed at my generation. It is exactly like Communism, appealing to our idealism, but having an insidious hidden agenda." but he adds,
" I still believe some drug experiences can open the door to mysticism and religious knowledge. God does dwell within as universal Love but the God of the Illuminati is not Love. It deifies man at his lowest not his highest. It freezes us cryogenically in our own filth. " http://www.henrymakow.com/001614.html Bill Gates: Satanist in Sheep's Clothes?
Physicist said,
"Christine,
Well you worry about rich Oxford drunks while the rest of us get on with learning about and combating the New Age."
idiot, what do you think the new age runs on in politics?
consider Bohemian Grove as an example. and then there's all the sellout of the Republican Party, the RINOs well, what do you think their shared core values are? sex and drugs and corruption. it keeps cropping up and the drug importing networks all track back to conservative intelligence agencies and government elements. There's the Franklin Scandal and the homosexual call boy scandal all Republican connected. basically the democrats are the slob redneck party crew and the Republicans are the more civilized classy types who were depicted in Rosemary's Baby and who conduct their hijinks in secret while posing as saviors of Christian civilization.
" We aren't supposed to learn anything valuable about the New Age movement. We are mushrooms, kept in the dark and fed manure. Now the big question is why."
actually your idea of valuable seems to add up to give you a list of names to vote for or vote against or show you someone who gives "wisdom" and can be "trusted" or some such emotional nonsense.
what I post is about NEw Age and about what is ongoing while the names change every several years with some exception. you focus on the fin, I am pointing out the shark. frankly, I suspect if you lined up everything you considered "substantial" I'd view it as superficial early grade school level information. you want to know who is doing what? take the names Constance gave you, the ideas you see described by her and by me and by others, and then go looking around for people who are connected to the former and/or exhibit the latter. post an update on the currect flock of new age freaks for our edification here.
some of you think only politics is New Age. others think only spiritual and occult stuff is NEw Age. I got news for you, its both.
Constance,
Are you going to let Christine call me an idiot without reprimand?
I can take care of myself but it might be better if it were not necessary.
Physicist
if you haven't noticed by now from experience of life and observation or noting the politics and people who are in such associations, that everything you say (SAY but perhaps not really) oppose is built in those socializing networks and works through
them, then unless you are trying to divert attention from them (in that case you
are not an idiot) you are an idiot who has let mathematics and other stuff of no use in real life blind you to the obvious.
In general, my view of people with degrees after their names is that they need to prove themselves. those degrees discredit them to me until they prove otherwise. perhaps in the first half of the 20th century that wasn't the case but it sure is now. the biggest mistake any denomination ever made (aside from obvious heresy) is to require their clergy have a college degree aside from graduating seminary.
and you can read A PLANNED DECEPTION which nowhere labels holograms as occult in themselves, merely talks about how occult agenda people could misuse them to further that agenda, and yet you argued a couple of years back I think it was that contrary to Constance's view they are not occult, you have worked with them yourself they are just physical, blah blah blah,
you have a problem. either you are part of the new age and are trying to divert attention or you are an idiot who can't understand what is written and what isn't written because THE OCCULT OR NON OCCULT STATUS OF HOLOGRAMS IN THEMSELVES WAS NEVER THE ISSUE, ONLY THE OCCULT PURPOSE THEY COULD HAVE.
SO WHICH IS IT? you got a reading comprehension problem? or are you up to something?
Constance never said what you said she said and then refuted. so what goes here?
I think I already addressed that, but I am bringing it up as part of a growing picture. Anyone who is going to dismiss the activities described in those articles
like you do is either superficial and blind (ergo an idiot) or up to no good.
TV and movies and music videos are put to occult purpose all the time, they are just physical themselves. ditto holograms. As for CERN with all that peculiar
stuff surrounding it, someone somewhere in that mix has an agenda beyond mere physics, WHICH DOES NOT MEAN IT WILL WORK. but having the agenda is the problem.
Paul: Yes, the cosmic microwave background is part of the evidence for the Big Bang. Many fundamentalist Christians challenge it, though, because the science indicates it happened 10-20 thousand million years ago, and they believe that the Creation took place some 6000 years ago. I find it better not to tackle the question of timescale before tackling the question of whether the Big Bang happened at all; the Bible opens by telling us that there WAS a beginning, just like the Big Bang says - an accord. (Some Eastern religions, in contrast, hold that the universe always existed.)
Christine, given that the LHC at CERN is designed to probe where physics experiments haven't gone before we can't deny in advance that all current physics will be proved wrong by a unexpected catastrophe. Some people exploit that fact to peddle nonsense and fear. It is like those who told Columbus that he might sail off the edge of the world. The best people to listen to are those who make no errors of physics in what they say publicly - and such people are not worried about the LHC. All scaremongers I have read mingle their fears with scientific statements that are demonstrably wrong, which is why I don't take them seriously. As for Oxford's rich drunks, that is all they are and I'd be a lot more concerned about masonic lodges there. As with physics, I know this world (Oxford and Cambridge) personally and you don't; personal testimony is not without value.
Physicist
paul
a catastrophe would not disprove physics, if anything it would support it because duplicating big bang conditions might make the LHC and surrounding locations go bang likewise. and big bang or no big bang it might blow up anyway. probably not.
if it open a dimensional doorway, that would not create an explosion.
Steen Hawking is one of those worried about strangelets making cataclysms around the world.
you should be as concerned about rich drunks as masonic lodges because they don't just get drunk they engage in debauchery and one group has an initiation ritual requiring essentially necrophile style beastiality.
the masonic thing usually overlaps. the rich drunks go on to be prime ministers
and leaders of finance, society, the UN and so forth. People like those have no
business being anything but ditch diggers but they go on to be leaders of society
and government.
what conflict is there between occultism and depravity? none. at one time in the Victorian England there was such a conflict to the minds of those who considered
themselves on the right hand path and denounced the left hand path. they did not realize the same devil led both paths, but the right hand crew at least drew the line on some things and usually were leery of globalism being more nationalistic.
its not the new ager type of Jesus that called on that stops alien abduction however. a new ager with this problem complained that calling on her ascended master type Jesus didn't work. it is the Jesus of the Bible who stops it, and Jesus focused chaste and honorably living men and women who are rarely attacked in the first place.
I think there is some JEwish saying that you should not be asking what was God doing with Himself before He created everything. Does the big bang matter? if it happened it could only happen because God made it happen. more likely it didn't happen. possibly the universe existed a while before the earth was created and stars near enough to see.
aside from any heresy, aside from any new ageism, there is a kind of godlessness of living without thinking about God or considering Jesus' preferences in some matter during the day.
and there is a difference between Christian civilization and Christianity.
sorry, the latter is addressed to Physicist, I'm tired and I misread the address to paul as meaning from paul.
By the way doesn't it bother you that David Cameron stuck his penis in a dead pig's mouth as part of an initiation ceremony, and doesn't that sort of thing explain why he's soft on gays and suchlike depravity?
and if his drinking buddies who are same class as he is and politically or financially involved or have something over him push some new age agenda, think he isn't going to follow that new age agenda because his old friends like it, or to keep some secrets quiet, or because he owes debts?
Christine,
It is alleged that David Cameron posed with his penis momentarily in the head of a roast suckling pig at a drunken dinner. You are already taking it - and the claim that it is an initiation ritual - as fact, although it is disputed; something that Constance would pick up on if it were in her court cases. As to whether it worries me, drunken students get up to all sorts of things that they regret later on in life and I believe there are more important things to worry about. If *you* want to worry about it, feel free.
Duplicating Big Bang pressures and temperatures for a brief moment in a small volume is very different from having those conditions everywhere as in the early stages of the Big Bang. As for it "open[ing] a dimensional doorway", please explain what you mean with reference to relevant publications by research physicists.
Physicist
Christine,
Take your meds.
Don't feel alone, Physicist.
We are all bad mouthed by that pitiful soul all the time, and she has gotten away with it for a very long time so don't hold your breath about that changing.
Out of the mouth speaks the abundance of the heart Jesus said. Just read that this morning in 2 different places and we know that her heart has often tattle-telled on her for respecting no one. Not God, not anyone.
She offers nothing to advance good information, understanding or solutions on the new age topic.
She has my pity.
Too bad she has a platform. If it was taken away maybe she would see how badly she has behaved, but I wouldn't hold my breath on that one either at this point.
dimensional doorway - don't give me that reputable physicist crap. you know damn well this is not about normal physics. take it up with CERN physicists one or two have speculated along the lines of breaching into a parallel universe. don't know which ones, do the work yourself. or are you so settled in your self satisfied sense of accomplishment and social acceptance you got no curiosity left?
Just read the pope's address at the White House. Not surprisingly, the pope never mentioned Jesus Christ, let alone refer to Him as the only "way, the truth and the life. No man cometh unto the father but by me (Christ)." The pope never quoted one single Scripture ... didn't say a word about a million American babies being murdered every year at the abortion mills ... never said a word about Planned Parenthood selling aborted babies' body parts ... never said a word about the abomination of gay "marriage" ... never said a word about the Catholic Church's priestly pedophilia crimes, etc., etc.
This "great moral leader" did however, refer repeatedly to climate change issues, immigration, along with a few vague references to his well known Marxist economic policies, etc.
In short, as the head of Satan's masterpiece, counterfeit "church" Francis presented himself quite well. Expect more of the same Internationalist/Marxist, climate change gibberish when he addresses Congress.
PS: Of course what gets much more attention in here is that Catherine Austin Fitts once had a friend that helped instigate Earth Day in 1970. Therefore, everything Catherine Austin Fitts says, writes, or thinks should be thrown into the trash barrel. Somehow, listening to what she has to say about the Banksters is interpreted as giving her a "blessing." LOL !
Constance,
I am in full agreement with Physicist here, enough is enough.
If there are no consequences to Christine's actions she will have no incentive to clean up her act.
You have had some very fine minds come and go here over the years yet Christine has pulled this blog into the gutter repeatedly. Please reassert some authority over the situation. I am sure no one would object to Christine's presence were she to clean up her act. I am not the only one who would love to see this blog get back on track. It has been off track for way too long.
Christine ....
I can't find anything regarding Dr. Stanley Monteith's denial of Paul's writings, along with denying the deity of Christ, etc. I also google searched and found nothing. The link you provided didn't load. I'm interested in this ... what else do you have regarding this?
Christine posted "The fish rots from the head down." The blog is rotted. The head is not Christine. Again, why are those of us still here being constantly diverted from learning more about the New Age movement? Why? I'm sure Christine will be glad to share her unending thoughts. Any other ideas? To get at the truth it is necessary to face hard truths.
Physicist,
I was the non-scientist asking questions yesterday. Thank you for your kind offer to answer more questions about CERN.
I want to first say that I appreciate your presence here, and have full confidence that you speak with authority in these matters insofar as you are who you say you are (PhD in physics). In reviewing your responses, however, I felt that you dismissed some of the questions I raised with a wave of the hand when I am looking for a deeper and more considered analysis.
In the case of both Michael and Patch, I don't think either is trying to popularize CERN to appeal to New Age sensibilities. On the contrary, I felt that both were very targeted in their objective, which was to warn Christians about what they have found. I didn't find any hint of disinformation in either of their presentations (I admit my discernment is imperfect). You seem to be saying categorically that both are, at a minimum, providing misinformation. My question then is - WHY? What would motivate men like this to provide misinformation (or perhaps disinformation)? How could they get the science around this so totally and completely wrong?
I appreciate the distinction you draw between the material and the spiritual. I wanted to raise a point I made yesterday in relation to this, namely, that Patch argues that CERN is trying to do with technology what occultists have always done with ritual, that is to invoke the preternatural and draw it into the world of matter. So you have here(and I realise my terminology is not really precise here - I have neither a scientist or philosophers head) a case where with occult ritual the spiritual and material CAN momentarily intersect - and in a most sinister, unnatural way of course. So I do understand the distinction between matter and spirit, but my point is that as I understand it, Patch and Michael are both arguing that by manipulating technology CERN can deliberately force intersection of the material and spiritual in an unnatural way. Also, Patch seemed to be saying some of the design of CERN was patterned after "channelled" information received by Tesla.
An example of where the material and spiritual intersect through God's intervention would be the case of miracles (a miraculous healing, for example, or the raising of the dead).
I realise both Michael and Patch could be sending everyone down the rabbit hole in order to distract, whether deliberately or inadvertently. But without your input, nothing I have heard from either man would have led me to even remotely suspect this. Dorothy has explained before that the coming New Age religion will be one that can be "proven by science." This quote was on my mind as I listened to the CERN presentations.
I realise you are going away for a few days so if you are unable to answer this now I would greatly appreciate a reply when you return.
RayB
the link opened when I tried it, the media player link to the episode won't open. this page is a list of members of Council for National Policy one of the things Constance has got wise to.
I can't get it to play but the archive is mms://radiolibertyarchives.gsradio.net/radioliberty/081709c.mp3 looks like it refers to a program on 8 17 09 but the archive page for radio liberty doesn't list it.
basically most of the western Christian civilization save America "liberty" and such like strutting stuff, is against such of the new age as negatively impacts them or might do so. they are selectively against this, but the core feeling is something that would not critique their own culture or whatever. their research is good enough, but you will like at Radio Liberty find it layered between things that are themselves dicey.
Phyllis schlafly alwys made me want to vomit, aside from anything she said something about HER. well her faggot son was interviewed search online for her name and son homosexual, and it seems two things about his family validate my impression. the parents were not someone you could go to to talk about things like this, and there was never any attitude expressed that gay is not good, and other little things. clearly, these people are not Christians, and apparently didn't have much trouble with his perversion. what he describes is not a Christian household. everything is about externals if that, nothing more. just being a functional part of society and "American" whatever that means. her frozen phoney smile always irritated me. I saw a family photo of them once, and while I am all for Amazonian feminism and such like, this should be to get women to acquire the virtues men are expected to. so that one cannot say the following from a movie "how do you understand women so well (or something like that?) "I picture a man, and I take away rationality and accountability." NOT to have the man reduced to something I can't describe but whatever it is, that's her husband.
This matter got press here before http://cumbey.blogspot.com/2010/02/this-might-be-important-eu-ministers-to.html
scroll down or use find. granted, there is a problem sometimes with the Jews-who-are-not-Jews line, but exclude that and there are other problems aho and others document about a lot of patriots and so forth.
http://yadayahweh.com/ shows what Winn is into. the predictable (and already done by pagans and atheists) effort of rejecting all Christianity on the basis of Constantine corrupting it is done and we can blame the rabid anti RC protestant crew for this one. (Totally insane to think that people who stood against torture and death would cave in to Constantine. this line of crap came from an Islamic polemicist originally, and bogomil heretics not unlike some extreme protestants but also heretics by reformation standards of Christology.)
on the old Cumbey site, someone says he or she listened 10 times to the interview, I guess Radio Liberty took the link down. maybe someone can find this online as a copy somewhere.
http://cumbey.blogspot.com/2010/02/this-might-be-important-eu-ministers-to.html
MCE has left a trail of self-righteous hating, occultic, and pornographic smut, etc in her wake, disrespecting everyone here (from Constance on down) for a long time.
She should write to and for the National Inquirer and Larry Flynt Publications and any other rag that loves half-truth.
She would be welcomed because she belongs to those mentalities.
She is not a lover of truth as she screams to us she is.
She loves herself, her high-minded low-living view of the world, just life in general, so civil discourse is not possible with her, and why she must force herself on this blog.
Dear 1.07pm
A quick comment from vacation. I was dismissive of Patch but not of you. I've come across a large amount of stuff like his but it is hard to know where to begin. If you ask me a fairly specific question then I'll be glad to reply (on my return).
Christine,
Re calling me an idiot, please heed Jesus' warnings about that in the sermon on the mount. I do actually hope to meet you when we are both fully sanctified in the New Jerusalem.
Physicist
RayB @ 12:28
No moral outrage whatsoever from this pope about any of the issues you brought up is very telling.
Just an agenda that dovetails nicely with the globalists.
And he is on a roll. There's going to be much more to watch as this unfolds.
"dimensional doorway - don't give me that reputable physicist crap"
When you can solve the Schrodinger equation for the harmonic oscillator - the simplest quantum problem - and the Einstein field equations of general relativity for the isotropic homogeneous universe - the simplest rigorous description of the universe - then you have the right to call other physicists' work crap. Otherwise, why should you be taken seriously on the subject?
Physicist
The Pope has announced that for a year it is OK for Catholic priests to absolve women of their guilt for having an abortion.
Who does he think he is???
Anon. 2:24....
Maybe he thinks he a representative of Christ, showing mercy to the sinner, as we all should be?
What would you rather have him do - condemn them?
It appears to me he is reaching out to all sinners, trying to get them to come to Christ by loving them and showing mercy to them FIRST, and then after that win them over by giving them the Gospel. Too often we get it the other way 'round, and probably lose a lot that otherwise would have been saved.
And please believe me when I say that I preach at myself more than anyone in what I say!
physicist,
what is crap is dragging that up to answer the issue of possible dimensional doorway, portal, breaching into another parallel universe. physicists with degrees and stuff HAVE argued a parallel universe could exist. that doesn't mean it does.
but THAT is what is at issue, and one of the reasons I do not take you seriously, is that you fall back on this instead of exploring beyond.
another reason is a polymath one of whose degrees was in mathematics. currently gone Alzheimers. But before that I described presenting you with an equation and you argued that without this and that it can't be solved. solving wasn't the issue, it was IDENTIFYING IT, and that would mean either identifying from memory (not attempted apparently) or else hitting the books till you find it and then you would know its name and purpose. you did not accomplish the first or attempt the latter.
This plus your fans' unwillingness (those who know your name which need not be told me merely the result of the inquiry "yes" or "no") to contact Cambridge and vet you, resulted in this fellow suspecting you are a fraud.
then of course your artful dodger way of sidestepping and setting up straw men.
anonymous 2:24,
ALL sins are absolvable if there is serious repentance which means wish she hadn't and intends never to do it again or aid in it being done, and does appropriate penance. the latter doesn't seem to exist any more. it does sound like the pope is talking the RC version of easy believism, because there would be no need for this
comment the option existing with repentance and some temporary excommunication I suppose, already. so what does he mean? sign of the cross statement of absolution and say 10 to 100 hail Mary's and our fathers that's that? no fasting, self flogging, mortification or stand outside church asking for prayers be said for her which is how things were done in the first several centuries, exclusion from the sacraments for I can't remember, 7 or 15 years for murder. I forget.
the divorced and remarried can get into communion if they divorce the current spouse. or get an annulment from the first marriage which would regularize the second.
So it does sound like he is talking some blanket absolution without repentance, without penance, without anything. yep, this is bad.
Marko
yes, a lot of things called sloppy or too worldly by popes recently may fall under the heading of this reaching out to the sinners and unbelievers.
but it has a way of morphing into moral and religious indifferentism, the phrasing without caveats (or not reported by commenters pro and con) seems to support that
direction. It certainly is used by the dedicated to sin and heresy crew to support themselves, and may or may not make unbelievers feel like looking into Christianity.
Readers should be aware that Christine presented me here with an equation that was not one of the icons of physics such as E=mc^2 or -(h^2/2m)del^2 phi + V phi = E phi (the Schrodinger equation) or curl E = - dB/dt (one of Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism) or F =q(E + v x B) (the equation of motion of a charged particle in an electromagnetic field). Those are equations so recognisable that everybody knows what the symbols stand for. She presented me with an obscure equation (as I could tell from the numerical coefficient) and did not tell me what the symbols stood for. Had I given Christine P = QR^2 without specifying the physical quantities represented by P, Q and R then I doubt she would have recognised it as E=mc^2. When she can actually SOLVE such equations then she will be worth listening to, but not otherwise.
Physicist,
Thank you for your reply. Correct, you were not being dismissive of my question, just of Patch, and I apologise for not being more clear in this regard. What I should have said was, I really want to hear more detail from you than a categorical dismissal, but not on why they are wrong about the science (which would go right over my head) but more detail about what you think is driving people like this to study CERN and come forward as Watchmen. Patch, for example, has written a few books but I would never class him as huckster. There is a massive difference in the way Patch presents himself in comparison to, say, someone like Jonathan Cahn.
I would like to hear your responses to the questions raised on my earlier comment to you tonight. If you would be so kind as to listen to that Youtube interview with Michael first (it's only half an hour) this would give you a context of where I am coming from as a listener. Another specific question would be Patch's claim that CERN is linked closely to the Genome Project at Berkeley and transhumanism.
I can't find any commentary from Christian physicists that challenges Patch's thesis so please believe me when I say, this dialogue is important and valuable for those of us laypeople trying to follow - and discern - CERN.
Many thanks and enjoy your hols!
Bluebird (have chosen a name for purposes of this discussion to avoid confusion)
Christine,
Quick, what is this? (h)=(4.14x10^-15 eVs) where V=nu
Or this: hv=mc^2
These equations are also icons of physics, I think.
You have one minute to respond without using WIKI.
Go.
Yeah, that's 5 minutes and your time is waaay up.
Physicist,
To add a thought - perhaps if you heard Patch or Michael speak you would be able to discern from the things they say whether they are deliberately distorting the science or just confused about it. Are they completely off the wall, or is anything they say remotely plausible? Etc.
Bluebird
paul at 4:35
you totally don't get it. that was a test of how Physicist would deal with the question. that is not to show I know something he doesn't. and if he would do
the research and come back with an answer, you would know what the test was.
I repeat, it is not about me, it is about Physicist. because however famous or however obscure the equation is, he should be at least able to locate it and identify it.
not solve it, which would require a value for at least two of the contents.
Physicist said as usual BESIDE THE POINT AND NOT ANSWERING THE QUESTION
"Readers should be aware that Christine presented me here with an equation that was not one of the icons of physics such as E=mc^2 or -(h^2/2m)del^2 phi + V phi = E phi (the Schrodinger equation) or curl E = - dB/dt (one of Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism) or F =q(E + v x B) (the equation of motion of a charged particle in an electromagnetic field). Those are equations so recognisable that everybody knows what the symbols stand for. She presented me with an obscure equation (as I could tell from the numerical coefficient) and did not tell me what the symbols stood for. Had I given Christine P = QR^2 without specifying the physical quantities represented by P, Q and R then I doubt she would have recognised it as E=mc^2. When she can actually SOLVE such equations then she will be worth listening to, but not otherwise."
I DID NOT ASK YOU TO SOLVE IT.
I ASKED YOU TO IDENTIFY IT.
AND NOT IDENTIFY AS SOMETHING WHEN IT IS DISGUISED WITH OTHER THAN USUAL TERMS,
LIKE THE EXAMPLES YOU GIVE.
I am talking about the equation in the form and using the terms given in my question. hit the books.
Christine that's over an hour. Forget it.
Here's what I know from physics, (which is non intuitive, but true settled science,
as opposed to mysterious, pseudo-science like we would get from you all day.)
The universe is over 90% unseen, unknown, undetected, dark matter.
We know this strictly by mathematics.
The universe that we know and see is less that 10% of the whole universe.
Light is both wave and particle.
The universe that we know was made out of light; (photons).
Matter and energy are the same thing.
Aren't these actual facts amazing enough for you Christine?
I'm far, far from being a physicist and don't even begin to understand Relativity or
Quantum physics. But as far as breaking into another dimension, I'm thinking that
God's holiness will make that impossible, as this is what keeps God separate from
everything that isn't fit to be in his presence.
Holiness is about being separate, as in: "Come ye out of her my people and be ye
separate",
or like Israel wandering in the desert for 40 years, and Jesus retreating and fasting
in the wilderness for 40 days.
The word church comes from the word ekklesia, which means separate.
The Lord is in his holy temple, let all the earth keep silence before him.
"Be ye holy even as I am holy" He says.
Eventually the sky will roll away like a scroll, and then maybe we'll know something about the invisible
undetectable 90%.
I personally think that this entire universe is just a hologrphic projection which God will burn up with
a fervent heat when he has had enough of it, but He will save a remnant for himself.
He will save the Ekklesia (church) and the Chosen (Israel); The 12 Tribes and the 12 Apostles.
I'm done.
I
Not good enough for her Paul.
Some of us go by faith (with God and the things he has done) some of us don't.
She is squarely in the don't (and won't) camp.
by the way, I can't find the post with the original challenge and I don't have a copy of that equation. can physicist repost it here?
looking for that I found this:
"The NT itself quoted Jewish oral tradition not found in the Old Testament.
Matt. 2:23 - the prophecy "He shall be a Nazarene" is oral tradition. It is not found in the Old Testament. This demonstrates that the apostles relied upon oral tradition and taught by oral tradition.
1 Cor. 10:4 - Paul relies on the oral tradition of the rock following Moses. It is not recorded in the Old Testament. See Exodus 17:1-17 and Num. 20:2-13.
Eph 5:14 - Paul relies on oral tradition to quote an early Christian hymn - "awake O sleeper rise from the dead and Christ shall give you light."
Heb. 11:37 - the author of Hebrews relies on the oral tradition of the martyrs being sawed in two. This is not recorded in the Old Testament.
Jude 9 - Jude relies on the oral tradition of the Archangel Michael's dispute with satan over Moses' body. This is not found in the Old Testament."
These are NOT "ORAL TRADITION." they are in the Deuterocanonical books, though the hymn would qualify as oral tradition perhaps unless it is lifted from a deuterocanonical or modified from it.
The fight over Moses' body and the quote from Enoch not mentioned here are from books not in the Deuterocanonicals now, but once given credence by many so perhaps
these points were accurate and the rest dubious.
"He shall be called a Nazarene" is OT, but not that form. Try Septuagint, which is what the Apostles used, and try looking at the BRANCH prophecies. Nazar is branch, so to say Jesus the Nazarene is a hint, "Jesus the Branch," righteous branch of Jacob, to those acquainted with Scripture it would ring a bell.
paul,
I thought I made it clear I would not be bothering with that equation challenge of yours, because the original challenge was NOT solving but IDENTIFYING.
and the challenge was not to show I could do math as well as or better than Physicist, but to prove that Physicist in fact has access to a university and books where he might find an obscure formula.
that is the purpose.
as for the post about the essentially unknown quality of the universe, mostly true, but as for burning it ALL up, no. READ THE BIBLE not just parts of it it will be an overhaul and a new heavens and a new earth not a destruction of everything.
http://www.theamericanmirror.com/cameras-catch-obama-with-horns-next-to-pope/
re: link above
And people think September 2015 is uneventful?
Physicists Warming Up the LHC Accidentally Create a Rainbow Universe
www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/physics/the-accidental-rainbow-universe
Anonymous said...
"The Pope has announced that for a year it is OK for Catholic priests to absolve women of their guilt for having an abortion.
Who does he think he is???"
2:24 PM
"Who does the pope think he is???" Here's a hint ... ONLY God has the authority to forgive sins. The pope, along with his "little" priests proclaim to have this power and authority. This gives them enormous power and appeals to a world of religionists that want to REMAIN in their sin and have, at the same time, the sense of forgiveness. Precisely why, as illustrated in a recent "gay" magazine that named Francis "Man of the Year!" Homosexuals will die in their sins unless they repent and believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. Francis doesn't agree ... he tells them "who am I to judge?" translated: "stay in your sins ... you are ok with me and God."
Also consider: there is ONLY One that is the true Holy Father. The Papacy blasphemously takes this exhalted title reserved for God alone. The Papacy has ALWAYS been the usurper of Christ and will continue to do so until the very end, when they and those that did not "have a love of the truth" will be destroyed eternally.
anon 9:24
while I do not accept that only Peter got the Keys (all the Apostles did later just read the Gospels) it would be nice if these Bible quoters would study the whole Gospels at a time instead of talking point proof texts.
yes only God can forgive sins BUT Jesus in giving the keys said that whatsoever you bind on earth is bound in heaven and what is loosed on earth is loosed in heaven, and also said this to the congregation at large in another context in Matthew.
this power of loosing and binding is about forgiving sins, mostly. But God is not mocked, and a person without repentance who gets absolved may be absolved but there is the sin of seeking absolution without repentance, trying to trick God or something like that.
Then again, you could debate as to whether this was transferrable, downline of the Apostles, or only applied to them.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/physics/lhc-accidental-rainbow-universe/
present link for the rainbow universe think, they must have changed it since you saw it.
I notice its dated apr 1 I wonder if this is a joke?
Kristine
You said: "I thought I made it clear I would not be bothering with that
equation challenge of yours, because the original challenge was NOT
solving but IDENTIFYING. "
Thank you.
Exactly.
That's why I asked you to IDENTIFY it, not solve it.
But you couldn't and you still can't even though the first one
is Planke's Constant (h); Very famous and very groundbreaking.
And the second one is deBroglie's proof that light is both wave
and particle, and by inference, matter and energy are the
same thing.
But you don't need science and you are too smart to respect a PhD
physicist, because...well, see, that's where I get lost on your "logic"
It ain't logical.
yep April Fools article at bottom of page
2:38 a.m. and others. The New Age coalition started development in 1875 with the founding of the Theosophical Society. This is where the New Agers themselves trace it, giving credit to earlier threads such as the Rosicrucians, Transcendentalists, Freemasons and other earlier occult threads, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO JACOB BOEHME, WILLIAM LAW, and others.
Interesting as to where they are today is this. Cliff Kincaid asked me on his television interview if I thought the New Agers might regard Pope Francis as their Messiah? I said more likely they might regard him as their "Master Jesus" come to prepare the Catholic Church for the "New Age" and the "Reappearance of the Christ" (Maitreya to them).
Interestingly, today I found this online from an Australian group of Alice Bailey type supporters calling Pope Francis the "Master Jesus". They had once bragged that Pope John Paul II would be this, but later Benjamin Creme gave up on that and wrote a book saying JPII was too set in his ways and it would not happen as long as JPII was Pope.
Is this now the time and the person? I don't know. Things have been turned around before: Krishnamurti 1929; Hitler 1945; Frank Buchman and Moral Rearmament (late 1940's). But this MIGHT be significant: Time and Events will tell:
http://www.brisbanegoodwill.com/astrology-pope-francis-i-forerunner-of-the-rider-on-the-white-horse/
or http://tinyurl.com/qcnpzt4
Constance
paul, you don't get it. I'm not even going to look at a formula I'm not going to finish reading your post. okay, I misunderstood, but you still don't get it.
the point is, I know the answer to that ONE question I gave Physicist. how he deals with it is a test he is flunking so far. I don't identify anything but that one formula. I won't say why I can identify it, and I DON'T DO MATH. so forget it.
however, I have lost track of it :( must keep looking through the old posts or someone find it and post the post here.
but when I posted it, I knew the answer. Physicist isn't even looking for it, unless he is. And he's going to have to go through every formula ever devised by mankind in every industry.
Interesting that the New Age crew was trying to identify any pope with any of their ascended masters (reincarnate?). I am not too surprised. PJ II was amorphous enough to have traditionalist RC on edge and sedevacantists screaming. This pope is beyond that. so it makes sense.
When I read or remember that Bailey statement that Christians or the church would bring in their messiah for them, I always thought in terms of the protestants especially evangelicals. the liturgical scene seemed too structured for that. But now it looks different.
Even so, even if they get some possessed person in to the papacy or effectively exploit a semi hypnotized pope to their agenda, and get some "messiah" operative, it won't work to accomplish the antichrist role until and unless God is willing for this latest effort to succeed.
that doesn't mean this won't involve serious trouble and persecution at times.
Alice Bailey and her pals would be dancing in their graves to see modern England. The cull of useless eaters has been underway for at least 35 years, in the hospitals and latterly in the Job Centres and disability benefit offices. This is based on experience of family and friends and self.
Now we have a Labour Party leader who bids fair to bring in Eng Soc. And my Christian friend in Cornwall, because of her skills has had several short-term unpaid jobs in the last few years, both in the local Church of England church, where she has watched the introduction of the one world religion to its bemused congregations, (Google 'Dor Kemmyn'); and in the council offices, where unelected officials are joining in the work of destroying the Cornish as a people. Their traditional trades have vanished, or rather been 'disappeared'. The young, with no hope of real employment, are being pushed into alcohol and drug abuse - and suicide. And it is much the same in other counties.
The thing to watch is neurolinguistic programming, or NLP. Our government calls it 'nudging'. Which makes it sound rather cute. As cute as a hungry piranha it is.....And the revolutionary groups on left and right are capitalizing on the growing, carefully cultivated resentment of the many to start a revolution.
You spoke of a move by an allegedly Christian group and their dodgy generals, Constance, to start something in the US. Something similar going on in UK. Google 'Daily Mail' and 'generals' and 'coup'. Forgive lack of exact refs. I'm tapping this out on an aged iPad from my sick bed.
How are Dennis Cuddy and his mum getting on?
Thank God I'm a Christian! "Justice is mine, I will repay....." It will get worse before it gets better, that's for sure, but for us, the fulfillment is so much prophecy should just make us look up...
This seems almost to obvious to be for real. You Tube video by the Puritan Pictures channel showing the interior of an absolutely extraordinary Vietnamese temple. It's called 'The Illuminati Church Cao Dai Satan Exposed'. Comments welcome!
On the business of CERN, one smells some sort of New Age deception. There is no doubt that there are occulti shenanigans going on around the subject which have little to do with quantum mechanics. Perhaps 'They' are playing Constance's oft-remarked game of 'Watch the Fundamentalists Run'?
Ditto the whole Nephilim thang, which is promoted by gentlemen Bible scholars like Chuck Missler and pastors like Doug Hamp, and run with by both youngsters who are genuine Christians and many more like Chris Putnam and Rob Skiba, Thomas Horn and Steve Quayle, who seem at best alarmists out to make a quick buck and at worse, part of the great deception.
Chuck Missler is particularly interesting to look at. A respected Bible teacher with an EXTREMELY interesting CV which includes work with SwanSat Technologies.
Herescope does a great job of exposing these issues.
This speaks for itself:
"the point is, I know the answer to that ONE question I gave Physicist. how he deals with it is a test he is flunking so far. I don't identify anything but that one formula. I won't say why I can identify it, and I DON'T DO MATH. so forget it.
however, I have lost track of it :( must keep looking through the old posts or someone find it and post the post here.
but when I posted it, I knew the answer. Physicist isn't even looking for it, unless he is. And he's going to have to go through every formula ever devised by mankind in every industry."
Nuff said.
Paul,
I have taken to collapsing comments when I can (I'm actually working on a scheme that would load the comments page collapsed by default, but it isn't simple). So thank you for providing a great example of tortured logic, grammar and thought. If you hadn't I would have missed it. (Or would I really?)
A person stumbling upon this blog and reading Christine's posts might, after a short while, have reason to recall this short poem, which I've modified slightly to make the gender fit:
As I was going up the stair
I met a woman who wasn't there.
She wasn't there again today
Oh, how I wish she'd go away!
Ruth of Exeter
Tarpley addresses this British military coup possibility while talking about the American version http://tarpley.net/deep-state-or-rogue-network/
you want warning? look out for this, look out for that, with minimal description or analysis? you are looking for a leader a director you don't want to THINK.
You can post here like anyone else can. You can spout disinformation, etc as much as you want to.
And I can tell you, I don't want your version of "description and analysis". It's often misleading and is distracting. You've proven this over and over.
But mostly, it is because you overrun and overwhelm this blog and are extremely ungracious while doing it. You have been warned by Constance and others disregarding and disrespecting their advice, and it means nothing to you..
Unbeknownst to you, the rest of can actually think.
What disrespect to those you are to regard as your neighbor. You do not take God seriously when he says, to treat others as you want to be treated yourself, in his golden rule. You are among the top 40 hits of blog abuse. A horrible disservice to this blog's mission. You should actually be ashamed of yourself.
The long and short of that? Repent.
Constance said @1:02 AM:
Is this now the time and the person? I don't know. Things have been turned around before: Krishnamurti 1929; Hitler 1945; Frank Buchman and Moral Rearmament (late 1940's). But this MIGHT be significant: Time and Events will tell:
http://www.brisbanegoodwill.com/astrology-pope-francis-i-forerunner-of-the-rider-on-the-white-horse/
or http://tinyurl.com/qcnpzt4
Constance
1:02 AM
I find it very strange that you would direct readers of this blog to an Astrology site in order to make the case for Francis being the "forerunner ..."
Who needs Satanic Astrology as a source for ANY information?
Why not direct people to the Scriptures that has plenty to say regarding the false claims of the RCC and the Papacy?
To 12:02 AM
Now I believe you are a disinformation agent. The website I directed people to was obviously a Brisbane, Australia Alice Bailey follower one. We know the scriptures very well. What was significant there was that at least some of the New Agers were telling their people that this Pope Francis was probably their long awaited "Master Jesus." We were told Scripturally not to be ignorant of the devices of Satan. It looks to me like you would keep them ignorant and playing into the New Age strategy of pitting target groups against each other while simultaneously infiltrating the weaker ones in those groups with occultism.
Constance
Ruth, I wouldn't doubt there is planning going on to bring about a revolution of some sort. The whole out of chaos thing. I can see NA leadership planning,"Might as well make the dissidents useful."
It's a wonder they don't tell us what to eat in the morning. Well we do know the work to control our thinking has been going on for decades. It gets harder and harder to know whether a thought has been planted in our brain or if we are coming up with a fresh new idea. At least they are more organized than Christine who throws a thousand jigsaw pieces on the table and suggests if we put them together correctly we'll hae some kind of picture answer.
Anyway, NA leadership is so sure of itself it even spells out procedures they are or will be using. http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/092315-772491-obama-uses-economists-to-nudge-americans-in-the-direction-he-wants.htm or http://tinyurl.com/nqsrx3u Right plop in the middle is Elizabeth Warren's name. Presidential choice in 2020?
Constance,
indeed, we should not be ignorant of satan's devices, and that 12:02 person would have us think we are safe as long as we don't have anything to do with the RC or
pope.
12:02, how exactly are we going to keep track of what to avoid, by simply avoiding the pope, if we don't pay attention to what he says? you are right back in the position that you condemned Constance for taking, looking at what an enemy says.
Ruth,
Could you remind me of what "Watch the Fundamentalists Run" is and how it works?
I remember Constance explaining it years ago but have forgotten the explanation she gave. I remember how the "Now you see us, now you don't" game works, but I simply cannot remember what "Watch the Fundamentalists Run" refers to!
12:02 says "Why not direct people to the Scriptures that has plenty to say regarding the false claims of the RCC and the Papacy?"
actually the Scriptures say next to nothing about it, though they say things that show where RCC is wrong.
I would expect, 12:02 am, that you with your anti papist fixation would easily be led in an anti Roman Catholic mass movement or something of the sort establish an RCC free political zone etc., that turned out was led by closet satanists, atheists, divinity of Christ deniers, anti Trinitarians and full on pagans and occultists.
This blog has strayed so far away from an understanding of the New Age movement that it is easy for new learners to confuse things.
The New Age movement, through Bailey, has come up with their own version of astrology. Here are the links.
http://www.lucistrust.org:8081/obooks/?q=node/455
ESOTERIC ASTROLOGY A TREATISE ON THE SEVEN RAYS VOLUME III
BY ALICE A. BAILEY
COPYRIGHT © 1951 BY LUCIS TRUST COPYRIGHT © RENEWED 1979 BY LUCIS TRUST
http://www.lucistrust.org:8081/obooks/?q=node/469
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
It will be apparent to you after studying the foregoing that one of the results which should emerge under the impression of this new approach to astrological diagnosis (as far as the individual is concerned) will be the more correct casting of the horoscope of advanced human beings—disciples and initiates. This has not hitherto been accurately possible. It will only come about, however, if there is wise and right experiment and investigation.
I have posited two sets of rulers for two types of people:
1. The orthodox and generally accepted series of planetary rulers for the undeveloped and average man.
2. A new combination of rulers and constellations for those upon the Path.
To Christina 11: 58 re Catherine Austin Fitts,
May I respectfully suggested you missed some [CRITICAL] facts?
1. Catherine Austin Fitts is a New Ager of no small standing herself. Like Ira Einhorn, she is committed to the entire agenda (unless there has been a subsequent repentance I haven't heard about).
2. Catherine Austin Fitts and the Solari paper you so respect have been featured by the INSTITUTE OF NOETIC SCIENCES (remember them). They have conveniently now apparently removed the page, but I saved it long ago to .pdf form and would be happy to forward it to those who email me with the subject line "CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS NOETIC"
There is a world of difference, at least to my present observation between Rosa Koire's educating people on AGENDA 21 and CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS who obviously run with the folks promoting same.
Constance
To 1:11 - I have strayed from nothing. Your post appears to be from a true New Age believer, at least to my first impression that is.
Constance
Constance, I gave the warning that she is not to be paid attention to beyond her exposes of what's wrong and why. Rosa Koire is against Agenda 21 but not necessarily the whole ball of wax. Given that she is an open lesbian and a democrat, I would take it for granted that it is only that part of the problem that she in her expertise and focus finds obnoxious, not the rest of it, and does work with and for other things.
Fitts as you point out is actively working for NEw Age interests, and what I find particularly dangerous about her, as opposed to Koire, is that Fitts will sometimes through in the "spiritual" solution side to this while Koire stays down to earth.
or did in her lectures and writing and interviews so far. I am over a year out of date on her so that may have changed.
The problem is that Fitts sees the globalist and breakaway civilization phenomena as a feature of predation and lack of love (which it is) then thinks that this peaceful seeming spirituality stuff is a solution (which it isn't even though it is not up front predatory). the trouble is the predators are using the same meditation and whatnot to enable their effectiveness at what they do.
if you view all things as one and yourself as a tad more evolved into godhood than the rest of the one, the proper mode of operation of the one (that is, the group that is one) is to serve your interests....back to predation....the love peace bliss crew either doesn't see this, or are secretly viewing themselves as each the ones to absorb the others.
I totally am disappointed with her New Ageyness, I first learned of her only in the anti globalism and anti corruption and exposure of the pretenses of the Republican Party and conservatives. I would not be surprised to find Koire start doing the same thing or a neo pagan variant, in the future. I doubt it would be the love peace bliss stuff something more focused and aggressive if she is into pagan reconstruction. But for now, she's useful.
I DO NOT RESPECT SOLARI PAPER I said I don't subscribe to that because of the New Age issues about it. Solari is her blog and while it has occasional stuff of interest for free, it is nothing I want to support financially. That latest acquisition of hers, Joseph Farrell, is a brilliant analyst of Nazi background and continued activity to the present day, but has gone off the reservation so to speak and when I buy his books I buy them used so he isn't getting any of my money.
Farrell is a sad story, and frankly I think the key to his failure is his not taking The Fall of mankind into account when he first started trying to figure out why he ran into problems in the churches he was involved with. Close friends who supported him through personal difficulties (and his own alcoholism of the past, which usually involves an element of pride) were probably already liberal Christians if Christian seriously at all.
A big problem I see about conservative Christians, is a tendency to revere the Reagan days, the economic theory and Bush sr. Ollie North still has a following among such I think. Fitts shows what really went on as do some others. We are willing to hear the dirt on democrats and liberals regardless of personal issues of the revealer, but apply far more extreme standards regarding those who expose the right.
in some cases, the very fact someone exposes something on the right (other than as being a sneak move by a socialist) is itself enough to discredit them in conservative Christian eyes.
Constance if you are that uncomfortable with the Fitts link, delete it.
Constance Cumbey said...
To 12:02 AM
Now I believe you are a disinformation agent. The website I directed people to was obviously a Brisbane, Australia Alice Bailey follower one. We know the scriptures very well. What was significant there was that at least some of the New Agers were telling their people that this Pope Francis was probably their long awaited "Master Jesus." We were told Scripturally not to be ignorant of the devices of Satan. It looks to me like you would keep them ignorant and playing into the New Age strategy of pitting target groups against each other while simultaneously infiltrating the weaker ones in those groups with occultism.
Constance
12:42 PM
Wow !! What an amazing post. You first make the false acusation that I am a "disinformation agent" then accuse me of "infiltrating" groups with "occultism."
All this because I rightly expose the RCC and the Papacy for what it is; a false, conterfeit that cannot in any way be justified by the authority of Scripture.
Continue on with your crusade of attacking anyone that doesn't agree with your turning a blind eye when it comes to the lies and falsehoods of Rome. Apparently, you seem to think that Satan is only involved with the New Age movement, and really doesn't "appear as minister of light and righteousness." The ONLY way of finding out truth from error is NOT by what our heart tells us, but by what the Word of God states. Who really is the "disinformation agent" Constance ??
Christine,
Your first post at 1:51 is a prime example of how people only believe or only see what they want to see, or what they "already know to be true", but which, in fact, may or may not be true. This is one of the prerequisites for successful disinformation - having an audience who wants to believe something is true, even if it isn't. Watch the video I posted earlier in these comments about disinformation to understand what I mean.
Reagan / Ollie North or Bush fighting Communism or Islamism, the enemies of this country (a country which has done more good in history for the greatest number of people BY FAR than any other) .... or..... Obama and his ilk, doing their best to DESTROY this country -- which do YOU prefer? It would appear from all your past meanderings that you prefer the second group, because you spend all your time attacking the first. If that's not the case, then please stop attacking the good guys. Yes, good guys. Because they are not the BEST or because they are not perfect does not mean that they are not at least GOOD. ("The best is the enemy of the good." - Voltaire)
Reagan and Bush and the rest of the conservatives that you rail against aren't perfect, but they are a lot closer to perfect than anyone else around now. Did they abuse power? Certainly. But their intentions were good, even if the means weren't. But I would take them ANY DAY OF THE WEEK over who's in power now. The intentions of those in power now are mostly evil. If not evil, then they are of no mind to set things right, which makes them accomplices to evil.
There is NO moral equivalence between Reagan and Obama, conservatives and liberals, West and East, America and Russia/China. You would love it to be so, because that's how you view the world, but then, that makes you susceptible to disinformation.
We are all susceptible to disinformation to the degree we want to believe something to be true, without having solid evidence in hand to show that it is, indeed, true. We go looking for "proof" out there on the internet, or wherever, and when someone comes along that tells us what we want to hear, bingo! We've found our "proof"! And no further investigation is done. Or if it is, we tend to ignore the things we find that contradict that "proof", or we give undue credence to the things we find which reinforce it.
Disinformation agents know this is how people are, so they use it to their advantage.
Constance, you've been hanging around Christine too too long. I posted the information on Bailey's Esoteric Astrology at 1:11. It was in support of your post saying it was a Bailey/Goodwill website. Ray B appeared not to know the difference between the average astrology material and the fact that Lucis Trust people are also promoting astrology as defined by them.
You responded Constance Cumbey said...
To 1:11 - I have strayed from nothing. Your post appears to be from a true New Age believer, at least to my first impression that is.
Anyone familiar with New Age material would have known right away about Esoteric Astrology. The information I gave had nothing to do with Satan, the Pope, Catholicism, Christianity. Even in his 3:32 response Ray doesn't seem to know much about the New Age movement. Oh well.
Hi Christine
Thanks for the Tarpley reference - will look at that. I got my info from the UK Column News, can't remember the date.
To Anonymous who asked me to explain the 'Watch the Fundamentalists Run' game, as I understand it, New Agers put out provocative disinfo designed to stampede Christians. Hope I've got that right. I'm sure Constance would explain better and maybe give an example.
The lady on this blog (the one with the super-ego) has claimed the late Stan Monteith said something he probably never did. Now that he is not here to defend himself, it's so easy. You go too far, my jobless friend.
Lady, get an education, get saved, or get stuffed.
"anon 12:10
if stipulating the existence the proclivities of something is a great temptation to you to go forth and do likewise as them, I suggest you skip the articles.
12:26 PM"
What an awful way to assume about someone else.
That person and this blog deserve a whole lot better treatment than you dish out, Christine.
No wonder people don't welcome your comments.
Christine,
Your attacks on Dr. Stanley Monteith are utterly unjustified IMHO. He was a fine Christian believer and scholar. No, I didn't always agree with him, but I would never have questioned his sincerity nor accused him of "marketing." I'm deleting your post on him. He was never "weak in the faith" to my knowledge!
Constance
To 4:05 p.m. You are spreading disinformation and confusion. The point of the post from the Australian Alice Bailey operation was to show that the New Agers are perhaps regarding Pope Francis as their long awaited "Master Jesus" who was to make changes for them in the Catholic Church. It was not to use astrology itself as a proof, but the mindset of the Lucis Trust people toward Pope Francis.
Why don't you come out of the closet and reveal YOUR identity and agenda to us? BTW, I do not "hang around" Christine. Who do you hang with? Doug Coe? Paul Temple? Taj Brooke? Bob Larson?
Constance
RayB,
I was responding to posts that did not bear the "RayB" name but appeared "anonymous" at the times I mentioned. If that is you, then I think you need to rethink your criticism. It was perfectly valid and needed that I present the evidence on where the main contingent of New Agers supporting the "Maitreya the Christ" position stand vis a vis Pope Francis.
Constance
Constance,
this is what he and radio liberty marketed and radio liberty still markets.
marketing is advertising and selling. here is the radio liberty link, which
includes a reference to the claim of eloptic energy, which was dealt with more
in the link I posted that went into more detail on that label.
http://www.radioliberty.com/miracle2.html scroll down. the only caveat is that
this oxygen level is the same as anything else, but admits the manufacturer
claim of eloptic energy without mentioning that this is charged into the product
by prayer.
was he with the SDA?
to 4:05 pm and whoever,
Constance said "BTW, I do not "hang around" Christine."
to whom it may concern, Constance lives in Michigan and I live in California. The
only time we met was back in the 1980s when she was on a speaking trip in CA. MI
to CA is a long trek to be "hanging out" with anyone. Its not exactly a half day's
drive to "hang out" over the weekend or something like that.
Christine, if you can find the formula you put to me then I'll show it to two people, one the head of a respected UK university physics department who is a former student of mine, the other one of the UK's best theoretical physicists, and see if they recognise it. I doubt it, in which case what would be shown is your inability to set a physics exam. Please repost the formula on the current thread.
Physicist
Christine,
Please tone down your comments to Physicist and others. I am going to continue deleting posts with rabid personal insults. It's still my blogspot and I need time to do research and writing as well as take care of my remaining law clientele. Please, keep your comments short, concise, and non-insulting!
Constance
To RayB:
It was my perception that you were criticizing me for presenting "Exhibit A" that at least one important contingent of the New Age Movement (Alice Bailey followers) believed Pope Francis was promoting their agenda.
If you would like to pursue something truly disturbing and fascinating, check out the relationship between Dave Hunt, William Law, and Jacob Boehme. I've held back on that one, but perhaps I should not.
Constance
Physicist,
as I said, I can't find the original post going over two years and I don't think
showing it to some other people is what I talked about. the idea was to see how
you would handle this challenge, and now you want to get help.
well, until someone finds that post and puts the link to it for me, I guess my
game is over.
Christine, people who continuously share thoughts through the internet are said to hang around each other. You do post so much on every page on Constance's blog and she comments more on your posts than on any other ones. In addition, I remember her saying she loves you. There is definitely a bond. Like you, she has started to throw nasty insults at anyone who appears to her to slight her. Lets just say you have other traits in common. Birds of a feather and all that.
Constance Cumbey said...
RayB,
I was responding to posts that did not bear the "RayB" name but appeared "anonymous" at the times I mentioned. If that is you, then I think you need to rethink your criticism. It was perfectly valid and needed that I present the evidence on where the main contingent of New Agers supporting the "Maitreya the Christ" position stand vis a vis Pope Francis.
Constance
12:40 AM
I have never posted anything in here using "anonymous" or any other name other than "RayB."
to those who think there is anything odd about Constance looking to New Age sources to see what they are up to - what are you doing here? did you read her first or
second book? It is almost entirely based on the New Agers blabbing their plans
and an analysis of how they fit some biblical warnings.
criticism of this is doubly odd, first, because it was obvious from her statement that she wasn't going to them for astrological or whatever advice but to see
what their opinion of a dubious from our perspective person is. Since their opinion
(which might be wishful thinking but still shows they like him) was good, it
follows he is bad.
secondly because this whole blog is based on such research.
anon 10:28,
okay, by that definition you and my other vociferous critics who I regularly exchange barbs with, hang out with me also.
Christine ...
When I read your charge against Dr. Stanley Monteith I was shocked, because I never heard him say anything that would indicate that he held those types of heretical views. I also read his book (I believe it was titled "Brotherhood of Darkness") years ago, and I am sure he never wrote anything even close to what you claim. Following your comments, I did an extensive Google search and found absolutely nothing to substantiate your claims. I think you should be extremely careful when making these types of charges against a man that lived a life of humility that was also well known for his integrity.
I strongly believe you owe his memory an apology for posting these false charges regarding this man. I'm sure you didn't intend to to this, and may this serve as an illustration that you need to be more careful in the future. If you aren't SURE about what you want to post, don't post it.
Looking at William Law excerpts, I see a big problem or two immediately.
"If Reason seems to have any Power against Religion, it is only where Religion is become a dead Form, has lost its true State, and is dwindled into Opinion;"
yeah? so suppose I don't holler hallelujah at the drop of a hat but I have a
strong Opinion that Jesus is God Incarnate and rose from the dead. And attempt to
comport myself according to what He and His Apostles said is pleasing to Christ
my King.
" and when this is the Case, that Religion stands only as a well-grounded Opinion, then indeed it is always liable to be shaken; either by having its own Credibility lessened,"
huh? not sure I understand this does he mean arguments and twistings of historical
fact and suchlike presented, or a decrease in my giving this Opinion credibility
on my own? the former is easily resisted when you know that falsehood will attempt
this, and the latter resisted by remembering that facts are not changed by my
Opinion of them, and resist such trends by prayer.
" or that of a contrary Opinion increased." rival religion yells louder? aren't we supposed to recognize that we might sometimes be in the minority, even persecuted?
"But when Religion is that which it should be, not a Notion or Opinion, but a real Life growing up in God, then Reason has just as much power to stop its Course, as the barking Dog to stop the Course of the Moon."
ahem. sure being grounded in the Word and noticing changes for the better in oneself
or successful suppression of bad in oneself, and really dedicated to that Opinion
is going to have this effect.
But in terms of living one's faith and having experiences that support it, and this
makes one more committed to one's faith, whatever it is, the same can be said for
ANY faith or even NO faith. Lately it is being suggested that atheism is a kind of
religion in itself. The same could be applied to being a professional pickpocket
to the point of kleptomania.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/William_Law
RayB
I will repeat the results of my own effort to find that taped interview. I posted it earlier on this thread, on the prior page.
the link opened when I tried it, the media player link to the episode won't open. this page is a list of members of Council for National Policy one of the things Constance has got wise to.
I can't get it to play but the archive is mms://radiolibertyarchives.gsradio.net/radioliberty/081709c.mp3 looks like it refers to a program on 8 17 09 but the archive page for radio liberty doesn't list it.
[there are some sites that claim to have it and demand you install a player to get it and one opens to a virus scam.]
http://watch.pair.com/database1.html is the original source, and scroll down to Monteith and you will find links to the episode which no longer work.
I do not believe you found nothing about this because I found this page easily and other references going back to it, so it would have been mentioned.
continuing, back in 2010 when this first got noticed, which I had forgotten about, someone noted that the 8 17 09 show did not have Winn as guest. Searching through
various archive notes, I found a reference to an interview with Winn, radio liberty is in the process of putting up audio archives, but this one has not been made available and the other list required purchase. At this point I don't want to redo an hour's work to find it again.
responding to this, was
"Anonymous : 12:46 AM
For what it's worth: Regarding Monteith, according to his own website here is the list of August 2009 programs: http://www.radioliberty.com/aug09.htm If you download the files from the archive at http://www.gcnlive.com/archive.php?program=radioLiberty he interviews Barry Chamish the first hour and Bob Chapman the second hour.
But the link anonymous 9:14am provided is from mms://radiolibertyarchives.gsradio.net/radioliberty/081709c.mp3. There on the August 17, 2009 interview starting about 1.02 is the interview of Craig Wynn and his Yada Yahweh stuff. (The first hour seems to be an interview with Bob Chapman but different from the one on gnclive.) And there is an oddly long amount of empty space in the middle.
Interesting that the two "archives" have different material... Stan (it sounded like Stan but I am no expert) asked Craig about science but Rosa" http://cumbey.blogspot.com/2010/02/this-might-be-important-eu-ministers-to.htmleventually Craig got into his novel views of Christianity as Anon 9:14am stated (also involving 7 Jewish feasts -mikre?). Not clear what Stan’s take is, he seems to find it interesting and praises Craig's research. He basically let Craig go on and on, occasionally summarizing or asking questions for clarification. Interesting.
so apparently back then in AD 2010 the archives at that link had this show, and
later it doesn't. It may have been pulled for embarrassment.
I think she meant 9:15
"Dr. Monteith's 08/17/09 guests were Barry Chamash and Bob Chapman, not Craig Winn.
archives are here:
http://www.gcnlive.com/archive.php?program=radioLiberty"
So that person Rosa DID hear and describe the interview. Monteith apparently didn't challenge Winn "eventually Craig got into his novel views of Christianity as Anon 9:14am stated (also involving 7 Jewish feasts -mikre?). Not clear what Stan’s take is, he seems to find it interesting and praises Craig's research. He basically let Craig go on and on, occasionally summarizing or asking questions for clarification. Interesting." Now, maybe he was just shocked, and Rosa doesn't say whether he
said he had doubts about Paul or not. Maybe he was letting Winn hang himself after
getting too focused on the prophetic importance of the 7 JEwish feasts, a notion
now viral and with totally disreputable origins.
So there it stands.
Christine
RayB,
She owes that gentleman's memory an apology, and she should keep going, apologizing to Constance, Physicist, and to the entire readership of the blog. And one more------the memory of her deceased mother whom she claims committed murder. Since this is blog not a courtroom, we cannot verify and she should never have brought that personal bit to this place in the first place. It does possibly reveal the source of the bitter root that makes her hurl insults far and wide here, though.
"as I said, I can't find the original post going over two years and I don't think
showing it to some other people is what I talked about. the idea was to see how
you would handle this challenge, and now you want to get help."
That is a lie, Christine. If I wanted to get help then I could do it without telling you. If you manage to find your own post (!) then I'll show it to two extremely good physicists I know and see whether they recognise the formula without knowing what the symbols in it mean. (In every physics exam and research paper the symbols used are defined early on.) I believe they won't be able to identify it either, so that what would be proved is your inability to set a physics exam, just as you can't actually DO physics yet you pontificate about it here.
Is that why you are not working hard to find your own post?
Physicist
it wasn't a normal physics exam. it was a psych out so to speak. to see HOW
you would deal with it.
As I said, a math phd who has another phd agreed there is a possibility you are
a fraud, given that you did not go looking to identify it. you should have access
to books and don't bother your friends, it is pretty obscure but bother them if you
want to do so. If you were hanging out at a university with such a library it would
be the first place you'd go if you couldn't remember it.
you argued about not enough information to solve it.
now, it is possible that you are one of those people who have trouble with written
and maybe spoken material, and excel at math.
but if not, your straw man treatment of Constance's concern about project bluebeam,
your evasion of my test saying it was about solving which it isn't but about
identifying,
and the cult like following who include people who refuse to contact Cambridge
with your name (those who know your name and I told them it was not necessary to
tell me your name only the results of the question yes or no) and vet you, who
react on "privacy" issues which is totally unprofessional,
make me very dubious of you.
now maybe you have a reading and comprehension problem and are innocent.
and maybe not.
hope this doesn't add up to more than one post a day, this being on a thread that
apparently almost no one is keeping track of, not the current conversation on the
latest thread.
Get out of your pj's, go brush your hair and your teeth and get that house cleaned up. And by all means, stop doing the bait and switch posting.
MCE, we know the fraud is you.
Christine,
What you have shown is that you don't know enough to set a physics exercise that could tell whether I was a theoretical physics researcher or a fake.
I am indifferent to whether you think I'm a fake. I'm writing to prevent others being misled by you.
You posted a formula and asked me to identify it without stating what the symbols in it represented. But every physics exam or paper or textbook defines in advance the symbols that appear in formulae and equations. For obscure formulae there is no universally agreed convention, so the same formula might involve different symbols in different books; only a very few formulae are so iconic that they always use the same symbols, such as E=mc^2 (Einstein's mass-energy relation) or F=ma (Newton's 3rd law of motion). Yours was certainly not one of those.
On top of that, the way you wrote the formula was not unambiguous, because you didn't use enough brackets or take the trouble to learn a mathematical typesetting language (such as TeX). How the formula looked when properly typeset was not deducible from what you wrote. I suggested that you post a snapshot of it as your own blog and inform me here, but you failed to do that either.
If you repost the formula I'l show it to two highly competent physicist colleagues who I predict will also be unable to identify it; who would then be looking foolish? You say you can't find your own writing; are you incompetent, or stalling, or something else?
In physics (but not only in physics) you are not my judge, and you are not competent to be my judge.
You are also back to badmouthing Susanna who knows who I am and has vouched here for my academic credentials. Pity.
Physicist
physicist,
you are doing the same artful dodger game. I can't be back to bad mouthing Susanna because I never did badmouth her just disagreed with her, and she wasn't the one I
was in touch with I don't recall who but it wasn't her. Until now I didn't know who
the other one was that knew who you are. or who you say you are.
secondly, and either this shows your dishonesty with something to hide, so you
are probably pretending to be some big name deal at Cambridge physics, OR
you are pathetically incapable of dealing with anything but numbers.
the latter is less of an insult and both are reasonable suspicions.
now, I think like an investigator, and as I said that question was a psych out to
see HOW you would deal with it.
Sure, I can't judge someone's competence as a physicist.
But I can judge the possibility that that person is not a physicist merely good at
digging up stuff online about physics to present a fraudulent persona.
the idea that your friends vetting you with Cambridge is a violation of your privacy
is a notion they would have likely got from you, and if not it is certainly
something you should have corrected them about when it came up online.
Because SUCH INQUIRIES ARE ROUTINELY MADE BY ANYONE INTERESTED AND ROUTINELY ANSWERED WITHOUT ASKING WHY.
your UNPROFESSIONALISM is showing if you sided with "privacy" issues. I assure you
I already asked Oxford about someone else, without stating why, and they confirmed
he was legitimate and did not ask why I asked.
A mathematics PhD who shall remain nameless being now in Alzheimers, on hearing about all this agreed your behavior is suspicious. That man is well acquainted with
American and foreign academia.
So now you deflect AGAIN the question or issue.
I think you need not go looking. you have satisfied my curiousity.
you are a fraud.
your style is that of someone with something to hide.
I think like an investigator....and an interrogator. and how one reacts to a question
HOW NOT WITH WHAT ANSWER YES OR NO BUT OVERALL HOW
is as important as what they say, and also what they DON'T say is often as important
as what they DO say.
until I can be sure you are merely an idiot savant or something like that, I will
assume you are a fraud.
and since you have admitted to posting anonymously without signing your "name" and
took Constance to task over Project Bluebeam on totally false premises,
you just might be a New Age infiltrator of some sort.
I put my name on research papers written for other physicists to read. I wish to keep my name private here from anti-New-Age persons, and also from you. I find hilarious the idea that you have "psyched me out".
Physicist
As usual, the artful dodger. I am not interested in your name. and you know
that.
How could you verify my scientific credentials without my name? I consider that you are the one who hides behind slidey rhetoric when pushed, Christine - Physicist
as I have repeated many many times, your friends who know your name, could contact
Cambridge for verification. then without telling me your name, tell me what the
answer was.
you keep pounding a non issue. yet when I spelled this out to whoever it was I talked
with back then, the reaction was that this would violate your privacy for them to
ask. This is astounding. as I said I didn't have to explain myself when I asked
Oxford about someone else. they just answered yes and what his degree was.
where would they get such an idea if not from you?
I don't do slidey rhetoric. I do detailed analysis. you do pomposity.
How long is Christine Erikson going to get away with this, Constance?
Physicist is an actual contributor to your blog, a real plus. She is on the minus side of that (for a long time).
I showed you this "conversation" on the other and newest thread and you are letting it continue?
No wonder so many good posters have vacated the premises. You have her to thank for that.
hi physicist, still complaining after you continued the conversation and I
answered? the artful dodger strikes again. I don't think you are fit to
talk with. Goodbye.
Goodbye would suit me too, Christine; my hope is simply that you not talk nonsense about physics here again. As for your insults and your insistence that I jump through your hoops, I plan to respond to neither - Physicist
Face it everyone. It is Constance who has given Christine this big, wide platform. Constance has been put on a pedestal because of her early, early research. She put Christine on this pedestal. The only losers are those who would benefit from learning about the New Age movement. Like physicist and others I stay here to warn against it.
Constance,
I in no way wish to distract from the topic of sharing information about the New Age movement, but if possible would you please update us on how Dr. Cuddy and his mother, Peggy Cuddy, are doing?
SEASON'S GREETINGS TO EVERYONE
DEAR ESTEEMED LOAN APPLICANT'S
A licensed Loan Lender, We offer Affordable Loan at 3% interest rate available for local and international borrowers, Are you seriously interested in getting a genuine Loan without stress? Do you need this Loan for business and to clear your bills? Then send us an email now for more details via:(tracywilliamsloancompany@gmail.com)
LOAN APPLICATION FORM.
(1)Full Name:
(2)Country:
(3)State:
(4)Address:
(5)Sex:
(6)Occupation:
(7)Amount needed:
(8)Loan duration:
(9)Loan purpose:
(10)Telephone
Email Us:(tracywilliamsloancompany@gmail.com)
TRACY WILLIAMS
After being in relationship with Harry for Five years, he broke up with me, I did everything possible to bring him back but all was in vain, I wanted him back so much because of the love I have for him, I begged him with everything, I made promises but he refused. but one day I explained my problem to someone online and she suggested that I should rather contact a spell caster that could help me cast a spell to bring him back but I am the type that never believed in love spell, I had no choice than to try it, I mailed the spell caster, and he told me there was no problem that everything will be okay before three days, that my ex will return to me before three days, he cast the spell and surprisingly in the second day, it was around 4pm. My ex called me, I was so surprised, I answered the call and all he said was that he was so sorry for everything that happened, that he wanted me to return to him, that he loves me so much. I was so happy and went to him, that was how we started living together happily again. Since then, I have made promise that anybody I know that have a relationship problem, I would be of help to such person by referring him or her to the only real and powerful spell caster who helped me with my own problem and who is different from all the fake ones out there. Anybody could need the help of the spell caster, his email: druguelspellhome1@gmail.com you can email him or called him on +2347056683626 if you need his assistance in your relationship or anything. CAN NEVER STOP TALKING ABOUT YOU SIR HIS EMAIL ADDRESS IS: druguelspellhome@yahoo.com CONTACT HIM NOW FOR SOLUTION TO ALL YOUR PROBLEMS.
Thanks a lot for all your valuable article! We are really happy about the your thoughts... SAP Training in chennai
Thank you for taking the time to provide us with your valuable information. We strive to provide our candidates with excellent care.As always, we appreciate your confidence and trust in us...!!! SAP Training in Chennai
Thank you sharing the guide and once i read contents really enjoyed. Next time more books and contents share the blogs.Thank you.
SEO training in Chennai
$$$ GENUINE LOAN WITH LOW INTEREST RATE APPLY $$$
Do you need finance to start up your own business or expand your business, Do you need funds to pay off your debt? We give out loan to interested individuals and company's who are seeking loan with good faith. Are you seriously in need of an urgent loan contact us.
Email: shadiraaliuloancompany1@gmail.com
Phone No: +919873186890.
michael kors outlet store
ugg boots
coach outlet clearance
longchamp handbag
dior sunglasses
michael kors handbags
adidas trainers
mcm outlet
louis vuitton outlet
ray ban sunglasses
adidas wings shoes
fitflops shoes
michael kors outlet clearance
air max 90
louis vuitton outlet stores
michael kors outlet online store
coach outlet online
michael kors handbags
coach outlet online
cartier uk
louis vuitton pas cher
toms outlet
canada goose jackets
toms shoes
adidas outlet store
reebok shoes
louis vuitton outlet stores
fitflops clearance
ugg outlet
adidas nmd runner
coach outlet store
longchamp pliage
cheap uggs
michael kors outlet
ugg outlet
czq20160824
Post a Comment