Tuesday, December 24, 2019

Merry Christmas! Significant 2019 events

It's hard to believe that Christmas is almost here again -- it may be the age that I've attained makes time's passage seem more rapid, but it feels to me a little like "it can't be Christmas -- we just had Christmas", referring to last year's holidays.

It's been a different and maybe tumultuous year for me.  My husband had a fall and was hospitalized in May 2019.  While he was in the hospital, I had a fall and was taken to an emergency room at a different hospital.  Needless to say, both our doctors have cautioned us about the dangers of future falls.  I had eye issues, some of which have been ongoing for the past two years -- wet type macular degeneration for which I have had shots in the eyes during that period, the last being last Friday.  I had surgery for cataract removals on October 17th and October 31st.  The vision issues slowed down my writing contributions, but I have kept very current on research. 

We lost our long time research contributor Dorothy Margraf earlier this year.  Our "Rich of Medford" (Richard Peterson) just lost his father this weekend. ''

The New Agers have lost people as well.  Barbara Marx Hubbard and Ram Dass (Richard Alpert) are two major names now gone.  Ram Dass' death received heavy coverage in today's New York Times. 

I discovered in 2018 that I had received some unexpected publicity.  One United Kingdom internet source published an article "Plutarchy in the UK."  Therein, I received the surprising discovery that I was credited as being one of the sources of "conspiracy theories" that fueled Brexit.  It linked my name to an allegedly "Fascist" researcher that up till then, I was unaware of --  one Paul Joseph Watson.  The same source also claimed I had "coined the word 'Prison Planet' in my 1983 book, HIDDEN DANGERS OF THE RAINBOW.  Obviously the author of the Plutarchy article must not have read my book.  I did not use that phrase nor had I seen it used anywhere until I saw numerous Alex Jones articles.  I always assumed Alex Jones must have coined that word.

If there was any word I did personally coin, it was probably "New Ager."

Then, if that was not enough, I discovered that I was the villain of a historical novel by an Australian writer on the life of Alice Ann Bailey.  That book was "The Unlikely Occultist -- Alice Ann Bailey" and the author was one Isobel Blackthorn.  However, I forgave all when she wrote that my work was "foundational" and that basically I had slowed the New Age down for nearly 40 years!   One needs a sense of humor to survive!

The Vatican under the leadership of Pope Francis obviously tilted the former anti-New Age stance taken 1993 and thereafter by Pope John Paul II to one of pro-New Age, pro New World Order.  The syncretism that Pope Benedict XVI opposed became defined by Pope Francis as God intended.   Encouragingly, resistance developed.  One brave soul tossed the Pachamama idols in to the Tiber River.  A brave Catholic Bishop Schneider took a strong stand against the apostasy introduced by the Pope into a Vatican mass.  I suspect he is rather out of favor with the Vatican's present administration these days, but conservative Catholics love him.

The LGBTQ Movement became much more militant and "in your face."  All those subscribing to plain biblical readings on the subject are suddenly labeled as "hate-speechers".

Beyond LGBTQ, suddenly "gender assignment" wherein one suddenly renounce the gender with which he/she was born, announce a change and everybody is expected to bless is now heavily among us.

In short, in 2019, up became down, good became evil, evil became good, and the times -- they are looking to me as pre-Noahic, pre Sodom & Gomorrah, and the events that Jesus himself warned us would come before his return. 

Yes, the times are serious.  I suspect they are going to be much more so in 2020.  2020 still sounds like "science fiction" to me.  But then again, so does 1984.  No man knows the day nor the hour that our Lord will return, but when he returns, will he find us ready?

That is my Christmas prayer -- that we be ready!

 Stay tuned!



1 – 200 of 423   Newer›   Newest»
Constance Cumbey said...

The last comment before my own on my last post questioned the celebration of Christmas. Here is my reply:

"Well, for the record, one of the first things I discovered about the New Age Movement after discovering it in 1981 was that they were determined to eliminate Christmas as a holiday and replace it with various pagan type "celebrations". Why? Because as long as we have Christmas, Jesus is remembered and celebrated.


Anonymous said...

Happy Winter Solstice!

Mark Nowak said...

This Is America: 10 Examples That Show How Dramatically The U.S. Has Changed As We Approach 2020


Anonymous said...

Merry CHRISTmas Constance, to you and yours!
As always you are a gifted and stalwart researcher, and a tremendous help to uncover the old and rotting roots of the "New Age" that hark way, way, back.
I agree everything is going back to the pre-Noah world.
And getting ripe for God's intervention again, with His judgment coming down upon the entire world. What a time to be alive on the earth!
But knowing the Lord Jesus Christ, as Savior, and as the coming King, according to the promises of His Word, I am full of hope...and thanks...that Jesus left splendor to come and make the way of escape, by way of His body and shed blood--born for it, as Scripture has told us--that by faith in Him, we may have an eternal and perfect Home with Him. Such a story, such a Plan!
Yes, may others be ready, too. Forgiven, believing, walking in the light as He is in the light because the darkness further descends, and more quickly now. Maybe many more people will "see" with better vision as 2020 dawns on the world?? Is my hope for others...

I also hope and pray you are mending, and that you, and your husband, are strengthened and comforted in the Lord's amazing Grace. He has given us so much Grace! And there is more where that came from!...in these days, in very spite of these days on the earth, and we all need it...we need Jesus more than ever. Hallelujah! Our Savior, our Emmanuel, is with us!

Dawn said...

This is a “sign of the times” story. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/invisible-ink-could-reveal-whether-kids-have-been-vaccinated/

RayB said...

Constance writes (in part):

"The Vatican under the leadership of Pope Francis obviously tilted the former anti-New Age stance taken 1993 and thereafter by Pope John Paul II to one of pro-New Age, pro New World Order."

Really? The Vatican, led by the Papal Seat, was "anti-New Age" prior to Francis? Not according to the National Catholic Reporter. Prior to Pope Francis, Paul VI, John Paul II, Benedict XVI all made glowing, and repeated, references to the works of none other than the cosmic, New Age Dr. of the Church Jesuit Fr. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. de Chardin was so "New Age,' he is broadly considered to be the "FATHER of the NEW AGE Movement" !!


The claim that Francis is the blame for the Church's move towards a "pro New World Order" would be laughable if it weren't so serious. The Vatican, by its words and actions, has been a MAJOR player in the development of a New World Order for decades.


RayB said...

Constance writes (in part):

"One brave soul tossed the Pachamama idols in to the Tiber River. A brave Catholic Bishop Schneider took a strong stand against the apostasy introduced by the Pope into a Vatican mass."

"Apostasy introduced ... into a Vatican mass" ?? What exactly is the Sacrifice of the Mass?

From the Catholic Encyclopedia:

"...the Church intends the Mass to be regarded as a "true and proper sacrifice", and will not tolerate the idea that the sacrifice is identical with Holy Communion. That is the sense of a clause from the Council of Trent (Sess. XXII, can. 1): "If any one saith that in the Mass a true and proper sacrifice is not offered to God; or, that to be offered is nothing else but that Christ is given us to eat; let him be anathema"

The Sacrifice of the Mass is Rome's declaration that the ONCE, ALL SUFFICIENT, NEVER TO BE REPEATED sacrificial death upon the Cross by Jesus Christ is INSUFFICIENT. In order to obtain TEMPORARY FORGIVENESS, one must continue to be a participant in the sacrament of the Mass, performed ONLY by the agents of Rome, their priests.

How then can there be "apostasy" when the entire sacrament is nothing other than a Christ denying blasphemy?

PS: if you don't believe that the Sacrifice of the Mass is considered to be EXACTLY the same sacrifice that Christ obtained on the Cross, you need to be educated. If you do the research, you quickly find that Catholic Official Doctrine teaches that the Mass is precisely that ... the ongoing, sacrifice of Christ upon the Catholic altars of the world for the TEMPORARY remission of sins.

RayB said...


To those who would argue that the benefits of the Sacrifice of the Mass are not temporary ....

Try to imagine a Catholic that religiously attends Mass for say 51 straight weeks. If this same Catholic PURPOSELY decides to skip Mass the following week and subsequently dies, what happens to that person's soul?

According to Official Catholic Doctrine, IF a Catholic purposely misses "Mass" and subsequently dies, they have committed a Mortal Sin and are no longer in a "State of Grace." To die in while in a state of Mortal Sin means that that person is doomed and is sent to Hell for all of eternity ! (Purgatory only "covers" the payment of VENIAL sins and has no benefit of erasing MORTAL sins).

Again, missing Mass on purpose (without a good excuse) sends that person to eternal Hell, with no chance whatsoever to ever leave. ALL because they missed Mass !!!

Does this, even remotely, sound like the Christian Gospel to you?

Have you EVER met a Catholic who expresses a firm confidence, due to Christ's sacrifice and imputed righteousness, in going directly, upon death, to be with Him? I HAVE NOT .... as in NEVER ... not even once ! Why? Because it is diametrically opposed to the teachings of their RCC, which is not based upon God's Word, but rather, upon sinful man's commandments.

Constance Cumbey said...

To RayB:

Regarding your post -- you were right about JPII up until 1993 when he dramatically changed course and took a very strong stand against the New Age Movement. Cardinal Ratzinger who himself was a converted Rahner type liberal theologian and changed course to what he called Scriptural fundamentals was credited with the change of heart. You might want to read a book by one Marshall R. Taylor, INFILTRATION: THE PLOT TO DESTROY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH FROM WITHIN. There are parts of the book you won't like, but a lot of valuable information is contained therein.

RayB, when we all get to Heaven, I suspect many of us will be surprised to see others there and they will probably be equally surprised to see us there. I truly believe it basically comes down to who loves God and is trying to please him. There is no such thing as a perfect church here on earth because there is no such thing as a perfect person here on Earth.

Merry Christmas to you!


Anonymous said...

Constance wrote: "There is no such thing as a perfect church here on earth because there is no such thing as a perfect person here on Earth."

But you haven't seen RayB's mirror.

Craig said...

Below is my blog post commemorating the day we celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ:


Anonymous said...

For those who might've wanted the answers and missed them in regards to what:

RayB said...

Can anyone answer this question:

What is the origin of the name "Christmas?"

How did the day to commemorate the advent of Jesus evolve into the name "Christmas?"

How was it determined, and by whom, that December 25th is the "day" of advent?

They are there but are located in the ending series of comments in the PREVIOUS thread (immediately prior to Constance's closing comment which she reproduced here in this NEW thread likewise in case anyone missed it).

Anonymous said...

Natural News

The top 10 most important anti-cancer stories of 2019 - 13 Hours Ago

Michael Bloomberg vows to shut down all U.S. coal plants, plunging America’s power grid into darkness,... - 13 Hours Ago

YouTube just deleted a wildly popular video featuring a former KGB agent detailing how communists have taken over... - 13 Hours Ago

The new bigotry of the Left: WHITE people run out of Chinese restaurant business over “cultural... - 13 Hours Ago

It's about time: AG Barr calls out commie agitator George Soros... - 13 Hours Ago

CNN sucks so much they have to PAY airports to broadcast their propaganda - 13 Hours Ago

Whooping cough outbreak sweeps through Texas school with 100% vaccination rate, PROVING that vaccines don’t... - 37 Hours Ago

The same CDC that uses fake science to push dangerous vaccines is also using fake science to try to take away GUN RIGHTS from all Americans... - 37 Hours Ago

Joe Biden calls for CHRISTIANS to be added to TERROR WATCH LIST for opposing LGBT abuse of children - 37 Hours Ago


Anonymous said...

US Trucking Association Warns Of 'Super Supply Chain Crisis' And A 'War Zone' In America In 2020

By Stefan Stanford
All News Pipeline

This story may be one of the most important I've ever written here on ANP.

With things now heating up big time in the state of Virginia with 2nd Amendment sanctuaries dominating the state but the Virginia attorney general saying 2nd Amendment sanctuaries have no force and Guns In The News recently reporting of the possible deployment of UN troops against law-abiding American citizens another sign of the tyranny being unveiled by Democrats across America, a trucking industry trade group is now warning of supply chain disruptions ahead. 

According to the Small Business in Transportation Coalition, they have recently issued the following warning to Federal, State & Local governments: "We are headed toward a Supply Chain Crisis that will entail significant hardships for the American People if we stay the current course."

Anonymous said...

Why Do So Many Liberals, Like Michael Bloomberg, Have A 'God Complex'? They've Forgotten Our Rights Come From God, NOT From Men NOR Government!

God gave us free will but a man who THINKS he’s God NEVER will.


Anonymous said...

Natural News

11 Ways to maintain your mental composure during a crisis - 10 Hours Ago

Ten things that could ignite a full-blown civil war in 2020… and any of these ten could happen AT ANY TIME - 22 Hours Ago

One-third of Democrat primary voters confirm they want to confiscate all your guns at gunpoint, even if you’ve... - 22 Hours Ago

Do Virginia Democrats realize they are only disarming THEMSELVES by passing more gun laws? Patriots refuse to... - 23 Hours Ago

6 Ways to prevent dehydration in a survival scenario - 23 Hours Ago



Anonymous said...

The Death of Privacy and the Curse of Secret Investigations


Anonymous said...

He helped EXPAND the surveillance state.

-Now he's its VICTIM.


Anonymous said...

Mystery as 100 stars DISAPPEAR in the night sky!



Anonymous said...

Upside Down Kingdom: Kanye West Is Preaching The Gospel, But Pope Francis Is Telling People Not To Evangelize


J said...


As always I find your comments refreshing, like a light and a salt among the people.

God knows the heart of every individual in every denomination and likely uses people everywhere to be His servants. Likely there are even people in cults who God calls and converts to His truth and uses to as a sort of "special ops" force within their various cults, sects and denominations. We can't really know how He intends to work with each individuals' heart, meeting them where they are, and as they are. We are all geographically placed in settings and roles that we did not necessarily ever fully and consciously choose right from birth.

The true church is spiritual. It is not an institution, denomination or collection of dogma. God can even work to convert to people and call them to Jesus as they are dying, and people have even reported near death experiences in which they met Jesus and came back converted to Christianity. This could happen to atheists, Jews, Muslims, cult members or to an individual within any denomination or sect of Christians.

Anonymous said...


#1-Strange Sounds


#2-Loud Booms




#4-Sky & Space












#10-Main Site


Anonymous said...

Genesis Chapter 6 tells us: “There were giants in the Earth in those days, and afterward.”

7 Proofs Of Giants




Anonymous said...

Natural News

Profile of a CIA-funded vaccine propagandist: Lena Sun at the Washington Post attacks natural health pioneers while... - 2 Hours Ago

BOMBSHELL: AIDS was developed as a bioweapon and administered through CDC-approved vaccine trials that targeted GAY... - 2 Hours Ago

Want some CRUELTY for lunch? Burger King’s “Impossible Burger” was developed using cruel tests on... - 2 Hours Ago

Scientists fear turning over launch systems for nuclear missiles to artificial intelligence will lead to real-life... - 2 Hours Ago

NY Times, Washington Post happily publish China’s communist propaganda articles in exchange for money - 2 Hours Ago

College students now tracked like cattle, using new technology that monitors their every move across campus, 24 hours... - 15 Hours Ago

Big Pharma’s addictive opioids are causing the ruination of society - 15 Hours Ago

The top 10 craziest, most deranged LEFTISTS of 2019 - 15 Hours Ago

Longevity science: Study reveals benefits of nutraceuticals and the Mediterranean diet when it comes to improving... - 15 Hours Ago

Rediscovering the many health benefits of frankincense, a natural analgesic and anti-inflammatory - 19 Hours Ago


RayB said...

Yep, thoroughly "Christian" that RCC is ! No corruption at all, and John Paul II is a "SAINT."

Disgraced Cardinal Theodore McCarrick helped himself to over $600,000 in Diocese funds during the time he was being investigated for sex abuse. Two of his "recipients" are quite alarming; none other than Pope John Paul II (received $90,000) and "anti-New Age" (wink, wink) Pope Benedict XVI (received $291,000).

I wonder how many of the parishioners knew that it is standard practice for the hierarchy to receive PERSONAL gifts of large amounts of money ... money that the parishioners GAVE to their church?


The RCC is heretical on numerous, important points of doctrine and practices.

The RCC has conspired for an endless amount of time to cover up and enable wide spread pedophilia among their clergy.

The RCC had a 1,000 year period of persecution, torture and murder of literally countless Bible believing Christians and have been made "drunk with the blood of the saints".

The RCC proclaims a thoroughly false "gospel" that is predicated upon strict, non-questioning obedience to the "church" ... a "church" which teaches the commandments of MEN, which negates the Commandments of God.

But hey !!! Nobodies "perfect," right ?!

RayB said...

... as in "nobody is" that is.

Anonymous said...

All Signs Point To A Satanic, Global Elite Pedophile Ring, Covered Up By The MSM & FBI For Decades, Desecrating Children Across The Planet  

The Leftists Mass Murder Of Children Proves They Are Devils Destroying America

By William B. Stoecker
All News Pipeline

Our leftist overlords profess to love children…that’s why they were so outraged when, under Trump, ICE separated illegal alien children from their parents. Never mind that Hussein Obama did the same; facts don’t matter to the left. Leftists love children so much that they have aborted some 6o million of them in the US, and now openly advocate infanticide, killing newborns. They support selling baby body parts, which often involves delivering the child and then cutting her up (with no anesthetic) while her heart is still beating.

For children who survive abortion and infanticide, the leftists have multiple vaccines of dubious efficacy, often containing harmful additives. Often several vaccines are administered on one day, which can overwhelm an infant’s body. Children who survive this are forced into the indoc centers (formerly known as “schools”), where they are encouraged to mutilate themselves to turn into a member of the opposite sex, which is biologically impossible.

Impressionable, ignorant children often fall for this, and the left wants their parents to be kept out of the decision. If they fail to have themselves mutilated, children are encouraged to adopt a homosexual or lesbian “lifestyle” which usually leads to alcoholism, drug addiction, terrible diseases, and, often, violence and suicide. But even if they remain straight they are encouraged to be promiscuous, and, of course, they are deliberately dumbed down and brainwashed with leftist ideology.

Against this backdrop, what are we to make of the persistent rumors that many members of our self-appointed elite are involved with child sex, even rape and child trafficking, and even torture and murder of children and infants? What of the stories of Satanic rites and human sacrifice? Absolute hard proof is lacking; the deep state and their controlled slimestream media are very good at hiding the truth. But remember that courts can convict with circumstantial evidence if it is good circumstantial evidence.

In the late 1980s many news outlets began reporting on a shadowy group called the “Finders.” In 2/87 Michael Houlihan and Douglas Ammermin, natives of Washington, D.C., were arrested in Tallahassee, Florida for holding captive six dirty, malnourished children. An informant claimed that these men were members of a cult called the Finders that conducted child sex orgies and even blood-letting rituals.

The group, led by one Marion Pettie, was based in D.C. and Virginia; the police seized documents showing that it was international in scope. The police confiscated photos of goats being sacrificed, and jars of human feces and urine were found in and around the cult’s Tallahassee warehouse. There was evidence that children were being transported back and forth between the US and Mexico. There were rumors that the Finders were a CIA front, and it is true that Pettie’s late wife had once been a CIA employee, and his son had worked for the CIA’s Air America. Then, in an all-too-familiar pattern, the charges against Houlihan and Ammermin were abruptly dropped, and the police classified the entire investigation.

Anonymous said...

In 1992 AWT Inc. published former Nebraska legislator John W. DeCamp’s book, The Franklin Cover-Up. The whole thing began with the investigation of the Franklin Community Federal Credit Union in Omaha, Nebraska. It was managed by homosexual Black Republican Lawrence E. King, and $40 million dollars was missing. There were claims by several people familiar with Franklin that the credit union was involved in money laundering, drug-trafficking, child pornography and prostitution, and maybe kidnapping and transporting child sex slaves.

There seemed to be some connection with Boy’s Town, an orphanage near Omaha, where there have been persistent reports of homosexual child abuse, and a connection with Covenant House, run by an allegedly homosexual Catholic priest. NAMBLA, an organization devoted to the homosexual abuse of children, was connected, and the Anti-Defamation League, a leftist group masquerading as a Jewish civil rights organization, was involved in the cover-up. Ronald Reagan and George Bush (George I) praised Covenant House. Nebraska Governor Bob Kerry allegedly was at least indirectly involved in all this; his election campaign was supported by billionaire Warren Buffett (who supports population reduction and Planned Parenthood), whose wife greatly admired Lawrence King.

George I was allegedly involved in child sex, and there have been other indications that the Bushes, members of Skull and Bones and Bohemian Grove, were homosexuals. And there were claims of child abuse and Satanic rites at Bohemian Grove and the involvement of the sinister Army Lt. Col. Michael Aquino, who had founded the Satanic Temple of Set at the Presidio Army post in San Francisco. There were claims of a snuff film produced by none other than “gonzo journalist” Hunter Thompson.

Witnesses also claimed widespread homosexuality among agents of the FBI in Omaha (as if the FBI’s reputation isn’t already bad enough), and at Offutt AFB in Omaha. Some 15 people connected with all this died mysteriously, as did former CIA Director William Colby, who DeCamp says was trying to investigate the operation. This is mostly just circumstantial evidence…but there is a lot of it.

Then there is the NXIVM sex cult, founded by one Keith Raniere and funded by Claire Bronfman, heir to the Seagram liquor fortune. Her sister Sara Bronfman is also connected, and their cousin Jeffrey Bronfman operates an ayahuasca “church” near Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico. NXIVM operated “day care” centers called collectively the “Rainbow Cultural Garden,” where children were psychologically abused. The cult has branches in Spain and Latin America, and former employee Frank Parlato claimed that they imported girls from Mexico as sex slaves, and branded many of their victims.

The cult supported the Witch Hillary in her campaign, and Kirsten Gillibrand, another leading Demoncrap, has multiple family ties to the cult, and Slick Willy Clinton’s crony Richard Mays is said to be a member, and Senator Chuckie Schumer. Allegedly former NY Attorney General Eliot Spitzer aided Raniere. “Smallville” Actress Allison Mack recruited young women for the group. There is usually a Hollywood connection to anything evil.

And of course we mustn’t forget the Jeffrey Epstein saga. We know that various movers and shakers flew to his private island, including Slick Willy Clinton, to have at the very least consensual sex with teenage prostitutes, and they may have committed far worse crimes, perhaps involving pre-adolescent children of both sexes, not consensual (meaning rape), and perhaps even more terrible crimes.

We will never know for sure, because the elites murdered Epstein, and the murder was so blatantly in-your-face obvious that only the terminally brain dead could fail to see it. The FBI raided his island estate, making sure no evidence would come to light. And remember, he was killed while in a federal jail, run by the Executive Branch, which, last time I checked, was headed by some guy named Trump. And the FBI is headed by the sleazy Christopher Wray…appointed by Trump.

Anonymous said...

Comet Ping Pong Pizza in Washington, D.C. is owned and operated by a well-known homosexual, James Alefantis, who seems strangely well connected to the movers and shakers in our nation’s capital, and visited the Hussein Obama WH at least five times. Alefantis was the homosexual “lover” of David Brock a Witch supporter. John Podesta’s emails indicate his close connection to the establishment; Podesta was campaign manager for the Witch Hillary.

The store is adorned with Islamic star and crescent symbols. John Podesta’s brother Tony always has his birthday parties there, and John Podesta held fundraisers at Comet Ping Pong for Hussein Obama and then for the Witch Hillary. In his home, Tony has numerous paintings of near-naked children; let’s not even try to pretend that this is normal. There are even claims that Alefantis’ associates may have been involved in the disappearance of British toddler Madeline McCann in Portugal; police sketches of the suspects do indeed resemble the Podesta brothers and Anthony Wiener.

Wiener, you may recall, is the former NY politician whose computer showed him “sexting” with underage girls, although, when this leaked out, the good old reliable FBI sealed all the records. Wiener is the husband of the Witch’s intimate companion (there have been too many accounts of Hillary’s lesbianism to ignore) Huma Abedin, a Muslim with ties to the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood. And there are reports that Alefantis, John Podesta, and Anthony Wiener were all involved in child sex trafficking.

An “artist” favored by Tony Podesta is Marina Abramovic, who engages in an occult ritual called “spirit cooking” involving human semen and breast milk. Some of her “art” consists of tediously long performances, usually involving self-torture, but she was always able to draw at least moderately large crowds of the glitterati, people eager to be seen as bold, daring intellectuals. And this is also a good example of the degradation of art, architecture, and music in the modern world; many patriots have long suspected that this is deliberate, a part of the elites’ Gramscian scheme to morally and intellectually degrade all the commoners. The Witch Hillary is reportedly a crony of Abramovic’s and likes her “art.”

Anonymous said...

And there have been multiple reports that the Witch is, indeed, a witch. It is a verified fact that she spoke before a NYC all female coven called “The Wing,” whose symbol is a Satanic inverted pentagram. The Wing advertised with a drawing of witches sacrificing babies (the definition of abortion, by the way) to a grotesque figure of Satan, and cursing Trump and the NRA. No Satanists here, just us loveable pagan Wiccans. Right. Kirsten Gillibrand (the same leftist politician who has family ties to NXIVM) also has attended a meeting of The Wing. And former Clinton employee (and possibly a hit man) Larry Nichols has always claimed that the Witch used to regularly fly out to California to meet with yet another coven.

And of course, many members of our ruling class are homosexuals or lesbians, which is perhaps part of the reason they are forcing pervert indoctrination on children in the indoc centers and having grotesque transvestites read to them in libraries. Aside from the rumors regarding the Bushes there is a fair amount of evidence that Hussein Obama and his husband Mike are homosexuals; Hussein did frequent the Man’s Country bathhouse in Chicago, along with Rahm Emmanuel. And there are more rumors about bug-eyed Adam Schiff.

As I have been pointing out for years, the way to find the truth is to see the way individual pieces of evidence form patterns and small patterns combine into larger ones. This is why so many people know that JFK was killed by powerful conspirators. It is how we have learned that the CIA and FBI are corrupt and evil beyond all possibility of reform. And the mass of evidence indicating that the elites are heavily involved in the sexual abuse of children, and possibly torture, murder, and even vampirism and cannibalism should not be ignored. Something else I have always said: the elites get away with committing horrific crimes by committing horrific crimes. That is, they do things so monstrous (Pearl Harbor, 9/11) that none of us want to believe it is possible.

But no matter what we want to believe, we need to confront the truth...


Anonymous said...

"Obama & Emanuel - Members Of Same Chicago Gay Bath House"





Anonymous said...

L.A. Times: Adam Schiff’s Gay Lover Makes Claims Of Abuse


Anonymous said...

Correction: William B. Stoecker, trying to be deliberately insulting though he may have been, to be fair, should've really said "Hussein Obama and his (rumored to be) husband Mike.. ."

Anonymous said...

More than 6,000 Christians killed by Islamic terrorists just in Nigeria since 2015, 1000 in last year alone!


Anonymous said...

900 Accused Clergy NOT Included On Sex Abuse Lists: Report

December 28, 2019
By Rachel Frazin
The Hill

More than 900 clergy members who have been accused of child sexual abuse were not included on lists released by their dioceses and religious orders, The Associated Press reported Friday.

At least 100 former clergy members who were not on the sex abuse lists have been charged with sex crimes, the wire service found.

The AP came to these numbers by comparing public lists of almost 5,300 names of credibly accused priests with a database compiled by the group BishopAccountability.org
“If your goal is protecting kids and healing victims, your lists will be as broad and detailed as possible," David Clohessy, the leader of the St. Louis chapter of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, told the AP. "If your goal is protecting your reputation and institution, it will be narrow and vague. And that’s the choice most bishops are making."

Accusations of sexual abuse have plagued the Catholic church...


Anonymous said...

Judge ACQUITS Cop Despite HORRIFYING Video of Him Trying to Beat Handcuffed 16yo Boy to DEATH



Anonymous said...

Vatican retracts 'unjust' sanctions against OPENLY homosexual priest


Constance Cumbey said...

.For the last poster and for the record, I'm about to go read the link, but I have found Lifesitnews.com to be a usual credible and reliable source.

Thanks for informing us.


Anonymous said...


You're very welcome.

-And for some HAPPIER LifeSite news:

12 Pro-life Newsmakers For 2019!


Anonymous said...

Caveat Emptor: NYT, and NOT to discount any legitimate information Infowars & Co. has put (and puts) out but it's nevertheless interesting to get a bit of perspective by hearing the other side of the story (as it were as it's) written by a man who worked for Infowars for YEARS:

I Worked for Alex Jones. I Regret It.

Dec. 5, 2019
By Josh Owens
New York Times


And regardless of how accurate this article was (or was not) GOD should be our hero and NOT any mortal human being(s)!

J said...

Anonymous 7:20 PM,

Alex Jones and other alternative media sources give us a shallow smattering of real information with sometimes enough real meat to keep people coming back. The best way to learn about a subject is to research it for oneself. Once having done so, one will find that almost *no* media sources usually cover a topic very well, with rare exceptions. At least, this is what I have found with those few topics I know very, very well from having researched them obsessively for many years. This then makes me wonder about the other topics I don't know as much about, causing me to feel very skeptical about how much information I'm really being given. It's not necessarily that it is usually the wrong information, but certainly it's usually a limited and/or biased selection of information.

It's so easy to sit there with coffee or tea and go back again and again to the same internet news sources, though. Part of the problem is lack of time to search out and read books. With just a few minutes here and there, it's so much easier to read one article here or there and skim lots of headlines. Definitely we're all capable of it. And let's face it, sometimes the news and headlines can be entertaining, even when we know the source is not completely trustworthy.

As usual, the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak (and short on time, too).

Constance's books have been the real deal, and I wish there were more authors like her. Sadly most authors are not truly "creators" in the sense of finding the information and then seeing the patterns in it to structure the story. Most authors repeat talking points, plagiarize, repeat narratives without regard for facts, re-arrange cliches...we need more "original" writers. While there is nothing new under the sun, and in a sense nobody is ever original, still there is a difference between thinking and re-arranging cliches. Boy do we need more people who shine as an example of that difference.

Christine Erikson (aka Justina) said...

Dec 25 was not celebrated as the birth of the sun for thousands of years, SAturnalia was celebrated starting Dec. 17 and celebrations of increasing light around the time of the solstice appear in several cultures, it was AD 275 that emperor Aurelian started the festival of the unconquered sun on Dec. 25. https://www.kirkdurston.com/blog/christmas?fbclid=IwAR2au4ouRFHOvPTKDEDyQ48W5Hm8gFTbxq9S5hBuvA4ghRStpFDhLds6vrw

this article lists also several pagan images in use for YHWHist and Christian purposes in the Bible such as the lion.

AD 192 and later efforts were made to calculate Jesus' birthdate, placing it in the spring or January 6, and shifted the March option to His conception at the Annunciation. This was based on a Jewish unbiblical concept that a prophet died on his own birthday. Later a calculation was made based on John the Baptist's conception plus 6 months would be Jesus' conception plus 9 months is Jesus' birth, which is Dec. 25.

Hislop was defended by Ralph Woodrow, BABYLON MYSTERY RELIGION, but after more research he concluded Hislop was dead wrong, the sources Hislop cites either mishandled or don't even resemble what Hislop says they said, and much of his examples were not from Babylon and Babylonian religion did not contain much of what he said it did. THE BABYLON CONNECTION? explains all this and details many pagan similar or identical practices that were either un opposed by YHWH in Israel or part of YHWH's mandated religous practices.

you can totally forget Hislop Nimrod being identified with Ninus was the work of one ancient historian esteemed as sloppy by his contemporaries, and Nimrod and Semiramis were hundreds of years apart from each other.

As to why Sandra and I were both posting on Mars, her posts reminded me of the subject and incl. at least one I thought should be on my page also.

I forget if I addressed this or not, but the idea is out there that the ORganic Act of 1871 made the USA a corporation and not a nation state anymore. This act is simply the law that created the District of Columbia as a separate status location not a state to house the Capital in so that the capital would not be in any state so no state could be viewed as above another for housing the capital city.


modern Bible scholars (read: semi atheists) have contended that Daniel was written c. 165 BC. this because his predictions played out so precisely they had to be done in retrospect if you reject the miraculous. Dead Sea Scrolls however show this is false.

"the Dead Sea MSS evidence argues for a date of writing at least before 250 BCE, and most likely one hundred years before that date...."


Anonymous said...

Refuting 'The Two Babylons' DEBUNKED


The Two Babylons - PDF

•••The FULL Hislop•••

"The Full Hislop is my PDF version of Alexander Hislop's classic, The Two Babylons. It has all the words and footnotes that Hislop has in his book, as well as his 61 illustrations. The online editions (as well as the newer paperback editions of his book) leave out more than half of Hislop's notes."


When Was Jesus Christ REALLY Born?


Anonymous said...

Is 'The Two Babylons' by Alexander Hislop Reliable?

By Janice Moore

I originally wrote this book review in 1999. A full decade has past. It is now the year 2009 and though still questioning; I find myself more critical of Woodrow's "logical" criticism of Hislop leading me to expand on my original book review.

Further Updates and Revisions Have Been Made

In 2003 in the process of
rebuilding this website and a rereading of this book review lead to even my being even more critical of the critical review Woodrow gives Hislop's credentials.

In Defense Of Hislop's 'The Two Babylons'

By Pastor George C. Bruns

"...Mr. Woodrow's argument against Hislop's The Two Babylons is that he cannot find any definitive proof linking Nimrod and Semiramis in current encyclopedic references. In fact he says that Nimrod and Semiramis according to these references did not even live in the same centuries. While it is true that several modern encyclopedias do not link these names together, several ancient writers DO!

Take for example the following written by Augustine of Hippo (A.D. 354-395), who also happens to echo the historian Eusebius and others:

"'Ninus, [another name for Nimrod] then, who succeeded his father Belus, the first king of Assyria, was already the second king of that kingdom when Abraham was born in the land of the Chaldees.... For when Ninus the son of Belus was king, he is reported to have subdued the whole of Asia, even to the boundaries of Libya, which as to number is called the third part, but as to size is found to be the half of the whole world. The Indians in the eastern regions were the only people over whom he did not reign; but after his death Semiramis his wife made war on them...'"

Anonymous said...



Could be coincidence but I doubt if every death on the list is. There are just too many. There are many sources of the Clinton associated "death list". Here is just one:

The 47 Clinton Friends Who Mysteriously Turned Up Dead (Pt. 1)


J said...

Who and what is Hillary, really?

Clintons’ Haitian Black Magic Secret


Anonymous said...

Thank You Christine for my weekly dose of clarity!

Anonymous said...

The Deep-State Democrats Have Months To Gain Control of America, Or It's The CHICOMS Turn


'Most of the IM [Independent Media] simply reports on the THE (Single) New World Order agenda. Unfortunately, what America is facing is not a singular plot to overthrow the American government, it a multi-layered series of plots that comes different directions and sources. They often compete with each other and their desired mission outcomes are often in opposition to each other. Here is what they do agree on; With some internal opposition, they are firmly dedicated to the removal of the Constitution because it is an impediment to control. The more radical fringes of our government, accept the notion that most Americans must die to save the world and the only way to save the world is to dedicate to the collective. The world has never been in a position to destroy itself before now. Therefore, individualism can no longer be allowed. They don’t care about climate change dogma, except for the fact that it promotes a type of “planet-saving” collectivism that is needed.'

Anonymous said...

Civil war RISK, state by state: Is your state likely to be drawn into kinetic conflict as the rule of law disintegrates across America?

December 29, 2019
by: Mike Adams
Natural News

Democrats are now all-in on the effort to spark a civil war in America before Trump can win re-election in 2020. The philosophy of Democrats, of course, is, “If we can’t rule it, we will destroy it.” And they know the Trump administration in inching closer every day to revealing the full breadth of corruption and criminality of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, James Comey and other treasonous criminals (including John McCain).

Notably, all Americans need to understand that until John Brennan, James Comey, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are arrested and indicted, there is no legitimate, functioning rule of law in America. If the most malicious, treasonous criminals can still walk the streets as free people, even after carrying out the most heinous conspiracy of crimes against America, then we do not have any functioning rule of law at all.

If a civil war is ignited in 2020, it won’t be like the North vs. South arrangement of 1861 – 1865. Rather, it will be structured as a series of state-focused mini-civil wars that pit the armed, rural, pro-American patriots against the treasonous, lawless, anti-American Democrats in their capital cities.

Conflict will be local or regional, in other words, not national. If such conflicts occur where you live, you could very easily find yourself caught up in life-threatening disruptions such as power grid outages, local martial law or truckers refusing to enter the war zones, resulting in long-term supply line outages of food, fuel, medicine and other important supplies.

That’s why it’s important to consider the areas where local or regional civil war conflicts are likely to occur.

The states most likely to experience civil war conflicts if the lawless Democrats manage to ignite the war they want...

Analysis: Such civil war scenarios are most likely to occur primarily in:

Democrat-controlled states … that have large regions of conservative residents outside the capital cities
…where Democrats are increasingly aggressive in depriving rural residents of their Second Amendment rights … and where gun ownership among private citizens is high.

Anonymous said...

All News Pipeline

The Globalists May Be About To Unveil Their Secret Weapon For 2020, Giving Barack Obama A De Facto 3rd Term - 17 Hours Ago

Signs 2nd Amendment Sanctuaries Are Being Spied Upon: Mysterious Drones Flying Over 5 Colorado Counties That All Voted... - 17 Hours Ago

The Radical Left Has Fully Revealed Their Vile & Evil Nature With Impeachment Nothing Less Than A Full-Scale Attempted... - 41 Hours Ago

Most Humiliating Examples Of MSM Fake News, Pushing Hoaxes And Trump Derangement Syndrome From Establishment Media In... - 65 Hours Ago


Anonymous said...

Misti Vaughn, the 29 year old wife of Google whistleblower Robert Epstein, who exposed meddling in the 2016 election, is killed in a car crash after 'she lost control and veered into the path of a tractor-trailer'

- Epstein, a psychology professor, has criticized Google’s operations and ethics
- He testified that Google's algorithm gave 2.6 million votes to Hillary Clinton
- Clinton carried the popular vote, though Trump won in the Electoral College





The bizarre connection between the former CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt and Burning Man!!!

April 1, 2019



Movie: Google bias begins with its 'Burning Man' chief
Peter Schweizer documents 'deeply systematic' discrimination.
"The algorithm reflects the biases of the people who create it," Schweizer maintained.


Craig said...

Justice IG: McCain gave ‘Trump dossier’ to FBI after bureau dropped Steele

The latest findings by DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz are raising concerns 'Never Trump’ Republicans could add to suspected political biases in the beginning of the ‘Russia hoax.’ One America's Kristian Rouz looked into the matter.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 8:42 PM posted...

- Epstein, a psychology professor, has criticized Google’s operations and ethics

- He testified that Google's algorithm gave 2.6 million votes to Hillary Clinton

- Clinton carried the popular vote, though Trump won in the Electoral College


DID she?

In The Western World Isn't REAL Vote Fraud IMPOSSIBLE?

Not Hardly.

For Example:







Answer? We should strongly consider: Paper Ballots COMBINED WITH ANOTHER SYSTEM as a 'check' on each other (so that the totals MATCH) perhaps using something such as BLOCKCHAIN VOTING (from the voting booths) as THE way to automatically have the voting systems check on each other.


RayB said...

Realistic, excellent piece that was posted on ZeroHedge ... well worth taking the time to read it.

America is Over But You Knew That Already

From the article: "A recent article addressing our “hysteric times” identified America as a corpse consumed by maggots, with liberals acting as the maggots and conservatives as “rooting for the corpse”. What an astute analogy. Because the Collective acts to completely consume rotting systems as those wearing MAGA hats perform CPR on a skeleton."


Anonymous said...

Yes, it's of paramount importance to have God be our god and put our faith in Him and NOT colors.

-Even if they're red, white and blue.

J said...

Anonymous 10:06 and RayB,

Agreed we should look at no human as the materialistic type of Messiah the Hebrews of Jerusalem wanted during the time of Jesus.

Still, I have a kid and hope for the best for his material future and spiritual one. Not willing to give up, ever.

My take on it is that Trump is a front man backed by an elite insurgency. This elite insurgency is a faction of the conservative national security establishment. Many but not all members within this faction wanted "pax Americanan" during the George W. Bush neo-con era. Now they must make a virtue of necessity by retreating into patriotism. They do this not out of love for you and me. They do this out of love for their power. But it's the best we have. We have to take what we can get. It's certainly better than American ceasing to exist.

How can I possibly just be okay with lying down and dying? I'm not all alone and old. I have two parents who are, and they need me to be strong for them. America a corpse now? That is premature.

My grandmother was supposed to die when I was thirteen but lived until she was into her ninety years old. My mother was supposed to die about four years ago but is still alive.

How do you know, RayB, that America is a corpse now? I am quite shocked at you, actually, although I suspect you are using hyperbole to make a point, and I hope that you are.

You know God can do anything, and what happens will be His will, whether it is individually or in aggregate. America will be a corpse when God is ready for it to be a corpse. Just as you and I will be, no sooner and no later.

Anonymous said...


Ray B didn't write the article! I just read it, and it's a very good write. I'm not sure what your purpose is on this blog, but it seems not to be a good one. You have strong opinions that, thank God are not mine, nor probably anyone else here! Please GO AWAY!

RayB said...

For those that make the dubious claim that the RCC's move towards the New World Order began under Pope Francis, think again.

During his Papacy, the "sainted" John Paul II repeatedly called for a new international system of governance, which transcended into the political, social and economic spheres of the entire world. JP II also was working towards the creation of some type of global religion, as evidenced by his "religious summits" held at the Vatican, which included the meshing of all the world's "religions," under the guise of "peace."

Here is an article from the UK Guardian dated January 1, 2004 entitled: "Pope Calls for New World Order"


It never ceases to amaze me as to how professing, bible believing Christians choose to ignore the anti-Christ nature of Rome, in spite of its long and well documented history. If you choose to ignore their nefarious ancient history, then at least look at the modern era, which worked hand in hand in establishing the Fascist dictatorship of Mussolini in Italy (Lateran Treaty of 1929), and entered into the infamous Papal Concordat (a REAL quid pro quo) with Nazi Germany in 1933.

Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." Matthew 7: 16-20

Anonymous said...

"I am quite shocked at you". WTH?

J, your nuts!πŸ₯œπŸ₯œπŸ₯œπŸ₯œπŸ₯œπŸ₯œ

J said...

Yawn, ad hominem attacks. If you disagree, state why. If there was an error, point it out. Yawn.

Anonymous said...


Your odd polemic concerning the RayB post is sufficient.

J said...

Anonymous 12:28,

My polemic was against fatalism, which was the overarching theme and narrative although the factoids sprinkled throughout were certainly accurate and well reported on in the controlled opposition media.

Again, dispute the error or argue philosophically against fatalism or whatever you want. Or attack me personally if you want. Either way. One way I will turn the other cheek. The other way I will accept or dispute depending on what I find right and wrong or true and false.

That is my "game". What is yours?

Anonymous said...

It should be obvious that the word "corpse" was stated to make a point to wake people up.

If it were LITERALLY true it would be equally obvious.

That being said, my point was that we should not be any more starry-eyed about the U.S. flag than our Founding Fathers were about the Flag Of England in 1776, who chose freedom over loyalty to that flag (wave it vigorously though the Tories might).

In other words, yes, save the U.S. if possible (but NOT in name only) and so then, but ONLY if ABSOLUTELY necessary: start a NEW government as peaceably as possible.

And GOD must be first in our hearts and minds regardless of what course we take!

10:06 AM

Anonymous said...

P.S. I see 12:28 PM & J exchanged comments as I was writing. Just to be clear, I am not 12:28 PM poster.

10:06 AM

J said...

Anonymous 12:44,

I agree with most of what you said. I had hoped the use of "corpse" was hyperbole but it certainly did not seem very encouraging to me.

Wake us up? All we ever get is shocked, shocked, shocked; and researchers have found that being repeatedly shocked leads to passivity. There were people who worked to deliberately shock the population over and over during the sixties. Because they purposely wanted to make them more passive and malleable in the face of whatever chaos and craziness and change.

The intent may be sincere. I hope so. I still dispute whether it's the best way to help people -- to either fear monger or fatalism monger. If we are left with this difference in opinion, that is fine, I guess. I realize more than one perspective is possible here.

Prophets in the OT sometimes shocked people, too. Jesus sometimes used hyperbole. Yet more often Jesus and the apostles shared hope with people. Yes, it was a hope for the next life, not this one. Still Jesus also engaged in acts of mercy and miracles for people in this life as well. And during the time of Nero most of the Christians in Jerusalem went to a place of safety, although there were some Christians who were martyred, including some apostles.

I know at least this much: the Bible says the Holy Spirit gives us not a heart of fear but of power and love and a sound mind. Are we every minute perfect, no, but we can still course correct because we know what the course is supposed to be.

Anonymous said...


If you haven't noticed, Constance is a Pharisee. She has strong opinions, that are rooted in 'luke warm' secularism/human wisdom. Babylonian mixing of the holy, and profane. Even Christ couldn't convince them. Other that Paul of course. That's why Constance isn't kind to fundamentalists here. However, if your a religionist, it's human kindness, and tolerance galore!

Just because your anti NA, doesn't mean your a fundamentalist. My Israeli neighbors in Arizona were atheists. Their daughter was married to a really nice Israeli guy, and they had a sweet little girl together. Their daughter 'discovered' she was lesbian, and left her husband for her partner. My neighbors had no problem with this new lifestyle of their daughter, they welcomed their daughters partner with open arms, but, they expressed to me that they were deeply concerned that their daughter, and her partner, we're opening a New Age bookstore together!

Anonymous said...

I guess when you see so much MSM brainwashing, and American's so dumbed down, addicted, and lethargic etc. Reading alternative media is grounding to us Red Pill folks. I get overwhelmed by alt media, but it does provide information necessary to perhaps stimulate some thought in others, to think outside of MSM brainwashing.

J said...

Anonymous 12:55,

You do know, right, that Constance was called a fundamentalist by Benjamin Creme on the radio?

Anonymous said...

I'm sure Mr Creme paints with a five inch brush.

J said...

The only thing that matters is what kind of brush God paints with. God knows the heart of Constance -- and you.

Constance Cumbey said...

To 12:55 pm

I'm not sure what particular axe you are grinding nor what agenda you are advancing, but I'm happy it's God judging me and not you, given the JUdgment that counts. The spirit of self-righteousness and pride is just as evil a demo as the others, if not more. I've been in a literal war over the New Age Movement issues since 1981, have taken unbelievable persecution from both New Age and Evangelical sources for my work, unlike others like Brandon Howse, Texe Marrs, and the others, I have never begged nor passed the hat for money. We have made icredible financial saccrifices over the years, but not to worry, as Jesus said, "Leap for joy -- for great will be your reward in Heaven.

Can't wait til I get there!

Anonymous said...

One of my favorite Constance stories is that of her saying the Lord's Prayer while she sat in the audience of a Benjamin Creme channeling type event. He failed to channel his entity at that event.

This here Anonymouse throws rocks from the shadows at a woman who's been out there sticking her neck out in her own name and risking her own reputation for decades.

It's clear to see, for anybody who actually reads her books and listens to her interviews, that Constance has allowed herself to be guided and used as a faithful servant of Jesus Christ.

She allows RayB to freely criticize the Catholic church in her blog comment area.

What's the problem?

Anonymous said...

"She allows RayB to freely criticize the Catholic church in her blog comment area."?!?

She just now SLAMMED him in her comment!

"The spirit of self-righteousness and pride is just as evil...as the others, if not more."

Oh wait a minute (my bad) she didn't mention him by NAME...

Anonymous said...

Oh, so you think "freely" means RayB should be given special treatment and never disagreed with? I'm confused as to your criteria? Also confused as to how you know for sure Constance slammed RayB as opposed to the Anymouse who had just called her a Pharisee?

Anonymous said...

2:27 PM

You're right, you ARE confused.

Apparently the humorous way to IMPLY that he is at times prideful and self-righteous escaped you.

RayB said...

For the record ...

This is Constance's blog. She sets the rules and enforces them according to whatever she desires. She has allowed me to post freely here, without restraint, and for that I am thankful to her.

Although Constance and I may have our disagreements (in particular regarding important issues involving the Roman Catholic Church), I have never sensed anything but a gracious spirit from her. Needless to say, she knows far more about the New Age Movement than all of us on this blog put together. I have never doubted her expertise in that field.

A VERY brief clarification regarding my positions as they relate to the Roman Catholic Church ...

Covering a span of my entire life, I have had numerous Catholic friends, along with cordial acquaintances, and do to this day.

My stand has NEVER been against INDIVIDUAL Catholics, but rather, with the hierarchy of the church. Perhaps because I know a considerable amount of the RCC's doctrines and practices (along with their sordid history), my desire is twofold; one, to see Catholics come to the "knowledge of the truth" from the true, and ONLY unfailing source, God's Word, which, hopefully, leads them to a true faith, via God's grace, in the One and ONLY Mediator for all ... the Lord Jesus Christ. And second, to inform professing Christians as to the truth regarding this clever deception.

Several decades ago, there used to be a popular saying among Bible believing Christians:

"Peace if possible, but truth at all cost."

I can't remember the last time I heard that saying.

It seems to me that in the spirit of our current age of compromise, the saying would be more like:

"Truth if possible, but peace at all cost."

The Apostle Paul once said: "Have I become your enemy because I tell you the truth?"

What are you out there that may be reading this? Do you love the truth, or, do you love the acceptance of men?

Anonymous said...

I agree with you, RayB.

We should be gracious, because the Lord has been gracious to us, but never at the expense of the truth.
What does that look like, sound like?
Speaking the truth (it is His not ours) in love is a kindness...caring about those to whom we speak truth will honor God, and intends to bless people, for we are all made in His image.
God knows our hearts even when people misunderstand.
It takes surrender to the Spirit of God to find that balance. Takes discernment to know how and when to speak, if at all.
I'm still learning this.

Anonymous said...

Is the U.S. a corpse?

Not yet BUT here's 2 BIG RED FLAGS:

36% of U.S. millennials now APPROVE OF COMMUNISM, UP from 28% last year: poll


MOST Millennials would RATHER live in SOCIALIST or COMMUNIST nation than under capitalism: Poll


A big reason for such things occuring is that the Totalitarianists relentlessly push their agendas in various ways, through various entities (people and organizations) and by various means WITHOUT the Pro-Freedom (or Anti-Totalitarian) forces doing similarly.

Simply put (unless we change):

They ACT.


Anonymous said...

NRA: Virginia Gov. Preparing For MASS INCARCERATIONS Of Gun Owners!!!


Anonymous said...

Pope Francis Told a Group of High School Students That He Was Visiting With That…

They Should NEVER Try to Convert Others to Christianity

By StevieRay Hansen

According to Breitbart, Pope Francis told a group of high school students that he was visiting with that they should never try to convert others to Christianity.

Pope Francis has certainly said a lot of controversial things over the years, but what he just told a group of Christian high school students is the most controversial of all. I know that may be hard to believe because some of the statements that Pope Francis has made in recent years have definitely been extremely bizarre.

For example, he has said that “Muslim terrorism does not exist”, he told a gay man that “God made you that way”, and he has referred to Christian fundamentalists as “a scourge”.

But what he has just said tops all of those previous statements:

Pope Francis told Christian high school students this weekend they should respect people of other faiths and not attempt to convert them to Christianity, insisting “we are not living in the times of the crusades.”

Asked by one of the students Friday how a Christian should treat people of other faiths or no faith, the pope said that “we are all the same, all children of God” and that true disciples of Jesus do not proselytize.

In fact, the Pope went on to say that if someone comes to you and is trying to share the gospel, that individual “is NOT a disciple of Jesus”…

J said...

Anonymous 5:03 PM,

Many of the Millennials and many among the generation after them will fall in love, have babies and get jobs. Some of them will find God. All of them will get reality adjustments in one way or another as they live out their lives. Just because they are Millennials doesn't mean they all have to be completely dumb, shallow and static characters throughout the entire remainder of their lives. Haven't you ever changed from when you were young? I have. Must conservatives and Christians so frequently sound like grouchy old men whenever they talk about younger generations?

Anonymous said...

Your all-too-frequent habit of negatively commenting about people you don't know (including doing so while somehow managing to not discern the absurdly simple difference between between POSTERS of articles and AUTHORS of articles) and drawing unfounded conclusions about them &/or what they're saying is getting VERY tiresome.

We, believe it or not, don't need your repeated verdicts on the merits of our posts.

Jsays she's only going to post infrequently, Jsays.

Believe what Jsays.

Jsays Jsays Jsays...

J said...

Are you trying to hold me to a higher standard than you hold yourself to? Jsays with bemusement more than anger.

Anonymous said...

Yes, try to throw it all back on ME. Sad.

J said...

Nope, not sad. Just bemused. Have a nice night, um, Anonymous.

Anonymous said...

Criticizing government through online speech will soon be a CRIMINAL offense under dangerous new UN “speech police” rules!

By: JD Heyes
Natural News

If ever there ever was a reason why the United States should seriously consider ending its relationship with, and support of, the United Nations, a new measure the world body just adopted provides a great reason:

The UN General Assembly last week approved a Russia-led initiative that seeks to create a new global convention on cybercrime that was also backed by Communist China. And while ‘fighting cybercrime’ seems all well and good, Western groups concerned about the preservation of civil rights believe that what really motivated the two powers to push for the initiative was a desire to curb freedom of speech and expression online.

As Breitbart News reports, the newly approved measure would establish a committee of “international experts” in the coming year: 

The panel will work to set up “a comprehensive international convention on countering the use of information and communications technologies for criminal purposes,” the resolution said.

The United States, European powers and rights groups fear that the language is code for legitimizing crackdowns on expression, with numerous countries defining criticism of the government as “criminal.”

At present, Chinese Communist leaders already restrict online searches and activities so that nothing critical of their activities can be found by citizens. In addition, Chinese authorities block access to news media that are critical of the regime.

And in fact, other nations have become somewhat authoritarian in their handling of online access, even the world’s biggest democracy — India. New Delhi cut off Internet access in Kashmir earlier this year after the government stripped away the autonomy of the Muslim-majority region.

Iran, too, recently took most of the country offline as the government in Tehran dealt with rapidly spreading unrest that, according to reports, eventually turned violent.

“It is precisely our fear that (a new convention) would allow the codification at an international and global level of these types of controls that’s driving our opposition and our concerns about this resolution,” one U.S. official said, as reported by Breitbart.

‘Cybercrime’ is just an excuse to formalize the destruction of freedom!

Anonymous said...

NBC Host Trashes Christians: They’re “Trained to Believe Fairy Tales” Like Noah’s Ark


Anonymous said...

Whopping 92% of Democrats found to be pathologically uninformed about the facts of reality!


Anonymous said...

P.S. To my 12:51 AM post:

Just to be clear, it was NOT intended as a comment on (or response to) the previous conversation WHATSOEVER (just in case it might've given some that impression).

Anonymous said...

This prophesy blog seems much better than most of them out there:


J said...

By happenstance I received this New Year message from somebody dear to me today, somebody who is a Christian and who has given me very timely messages before in the past when I needed them most, without ever realizing what it meant to me. This person is completely unaware of my recent contention regarding fatalism vs. hope. Could be only coincidence or maybe not. If you like it then warm your heart with it. If you don't like it or believe that it means anything, that is your prerogative, too.

Hope is the thing with feathers
that perches in the soul,
and sings the tune without the words,
and never stops at all,
and sweetest in the gale is heard;
and sore must be the storm
that could abash the little bird
that kept so many warm!
I've heard it in the chillest land
and on the strangest sea;
yet, never, in extremity,
it asked a crumb of me.
~~~Verse by Emily Dickinson~~~

May the voice of hope grow stronger in you with each new day, as the voices of discouragement fade away into silence for want of a crumb!

Craig said...

Hope? Hope springs eternal, not temporal.

18 For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory that is to be revealed to us. 19 For the anxious longing of the creation waits eagerly for the revealing of the sons of God. 20 For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it, in hope 21 that the creation itself also will be set free from its slavery to corruption into the freedom of the glory of the children of God. 22 For we know that the whole creation groans and suffers the pains of childbirth together until now. 23 And not only this, but also we ourselves, having the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our body. 24 For in hope we have been saved, but hope that is seen is not hope; for who hopes for what he already sees? 25 But if we hope for what we do not see, with perseverance we wait eagerly for it (Romans 8:18-25, NASB).

Anonymous said...

J, at the end of the last thread, asked if anyone wanted to 'debate' her on a topic? She is either intellectually bored at home, or she just enjoys being a trouble maker here? She makes snotty remarks toward others, but stands behind God if someone challenges her or someone else here. To say "I am shocked at you" for someone mearly posting a link to an article is childish. To take the 5:03 PM post, and completely fail to address the point of the topic, and launch into a defense of Millennials shows that your more concerned with deflection here, than anything else. Im not sure what your genetic profile looks like, or what kind of abuse you have suffered in life that has affected your mind? If you have insurance, and have not yet had a proper evaluation by a Psychiatrist, then I suggest you get one! And I mean that in a good way.

RayB said...

Emily Dickinson, the author of the "hope" poem posted above, apparently lived a rather pitiful, hopeless life.
Emily Elizabeth Dickinson (December 10, 1830 – May 15, 1886) was an American poet.

From Wikipedia ...

Dickinson was born in Amherst, Massachusetts, into a prominent family with strong ties to its community. After studying at the Amherst Academy for seven years in her youth, she briefly attended the Mount Holyoke Female Seminary before returning to her family's house in Amherst.

Evidence suggests that Dickinson lived much of her life in isolation. Considered an eccentric by locals, she developed a penchant for white clothing and was known for her reluctance to greet guests or, later in life, to even leave her bedroom. Dickinson never married, and most friendships between her and others depended entirely upon correspondence.[2]

While Dickinson was a prolific poet, fewer than a dozen of her nearly 1,800 poems were published during her lifetime.

RayB said...

What is the foundation of real "hope" for a Christian?

True "hope" has its foundation firmly planted in the TRUTH which is God's WORD ...

"Thou art my hiding place and my shield: I hope in thy word." Psalm 119:114

"Be of good courage, and he shall strengthen your heart, all ye that hope in the Lord." Psalm 31:24

"I wait for the Lord, my soul doth wait, and in his word do I hope." Psalm 130:5

"Lead me in thy truth, and teach me: for thou art the God of my salvation; on thee do I wait all the day." Psalm 25:5

"Hope" is a gift from God the Father .... planted firmly in the "lively hope" by the resurrection of Jesus Christ ...

"Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead." 1 Peter 1:3

On sharing the true "hope" that you have as a Christian ....

"But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear." 1 Peter 3:15

Anonymous said...

Thanks Craig!
Thanks for the perfect response about hope!
And for letting the Lord be the One to say it so well!!!
Happy 2020!
May hope, indeed, lead the way of our understanding to give us all clarity with "20/20 vision" for the new year!

Craig said...

@ 10:47 AM,

You're welcome. And thanks for the comment and well wishes. Given the latter part of your comment, you may like today's pithy, tongue-in-cheek blog post:


Anonymous said...

Anonymous 8:23 AM

The prophecy blog you mentioned (regardless of anything else) states:

"America is not found in end time Bible prophecy."

You might very possibly therefore find this book of surprising interest:


RayB said...

How about starting out the New Year by reading an excellent (and old) book that covers what the early church fathers taught about Bible Prophecy?

This is an excellent book (compilation of a series of lectures) by H. Grattan Guinness. One of the finest, incredibly well documented books (from an historical and biblical point of view) that I have ever read.

Entitled "Romanism and the Reformation," it covers in detail who exactly the "little horn" of Daniel and Revelation really is.

You can download the entire book for free on your device (I put it on my Kindle):


Anonymous said...

Natural News

Ten insane, completely irrational things millions of Americans believe as we enter the 2020s - 57 Minutes Ago

The top 10 FAKE SCIENCE stories of 2019 - 3 Hours Ago

Barack Obama committed treason against America by approving "Spygate" is he now the focus of investigations? - 3 Hours Ago

The planned sterilizations of black people is sanctioned by “humanitarian” organizations - 3 Hours Ago

The top 10 most bizarre science stories of 2019 - 3 Hours Ago

DEPOPULATION vectors are accelerating as globalists target humanity for extermination - 15 Hours Ago

Joe Biden recently trashed Texas officials for signing bill allowing churchgoers to carry concealed - 17 Hours Ago



RayB said...

The post by Anonymous @ 11:58 AM recommends a book that falsely proclaims the doctrine known as "British Israelism."

Among many false teachers that proclaimed this thoroughly unscriptural point of view (I'm being nice by not calling it a heresy) was none other than Herbert W. Armstrong, as noted in the following:

"The teaching of British Israelism was vigorously promoted beginning in the 1960s by Herbert W. Armstrong, founder and former Pastor General of the Worldwide Church of God. Armstrong believed that the teaching was a key to understanding biblical prophecy: "One might ask, were not biblical prophecies closed and sealed? Indeed they were—until now! And even now they can be understood only by those who possess the master key to unlock them." NOTE: of course Armstrong "possessed the MASTER KEY" to this "special knowledge."

"Armstrong believed that he was called by God to proclaim the prophecies to the Lost Tribes of Israel before the "end-times".

PERSONAL NOTE: it is VERY common for cult leaders to proclaim that they have some "special knowledge" (hidden from everyone else), along with a "special calling" from God Himself. Armstrong was no exception to this rule.

Anonymous said...

Notice how "Mr. Bible Truth (aka Martin Luther's Doctrines Right Or Wrong)" DOESN'T refute what the book itself says but tries to discourage the reading of it in the first place?

He's great at "sounding the alarm" on all beliefs that don't jibe with his own, isn't he?

Here's an idea that he will absolutely HATE: Make your OWN mind up as to it's merits (or lack thereof) by actually READING it instead of trusting a MAN (namely HIM)!

Anonymous said...

Horrific Texas Church Shooting, Immediately Ended By 'A Good Guy With A Gun', Provides A Motto For America For 2020:

"It's Time To Stop The Spread Of Evil Before It Gets Worse!"

Americans Should NEVER Give Up Their Guns: Hatred + Government + Disarmed Citizens = GENOCIDE!

December 31, 2019
By Stefan Stanford
All News Pipeline
Live Free Or Die

The words spoken by Tarrant County, Texas Sheriff Bill Waybourn this past Sunday following a "horrific day in Tarrant County" could very well be a metaphor for America as 2020 arrives: "Today evil walked boldly among us, but let me remind you, good people raised up and stopped it before it got worse". 

While Sheriff Waybourn's remarks referred to the horrific church shooting that claimed the lives of two at the West Freeway Church of Christ in White Settlement, a suburb northwest of Fort Worth, Texas, what happened at a House of God on Sunday in Texas is proof of why law-abiding Americans should NEVER give up their means to protect themselves and their families as a transient bent upon causing destruction was stopped from carrying out much more carnage than he did by a law-abiding US citizen, a 70-year old man, who helped prove Charlton Heston's words:

"A gun in the hands of a bad man is a bad thing. A gun in the hands of a good man is no threat to anyone except bad people".

And shooter Keith Thomas Kinnunen found that out real quickly as he was dropped with one shot fired by former FBI agent Jack Wilson who said he had to 'take out' the shooter because 'evil exists', thus ending a horrific tragedy within 6 seconds when, if Democrats nationwide had their way and Americans were disarmed, shooter Kinnunen may have been able to mow down an unlimited number of innocent people before someone was able to disarm him or otherwise take him out.

As author Thomas Lifson reports in this new story over at The American Thinker titled "The mass murder that didn’t happen because Texans are smarter than New Yorkers, Californians and progressives everywhere", Americans across the country could learn a great deal by what happened in Texas on Sunday. 

In the fantasy world inhabited by progressives, passing laws to restrict gun ownership and the carrying of firearms prevents violence. The precise opposite is the truth, as demonstrated convincingly by John Lott, whose research led him to change his position on gun control once he discovered the facts. His book More Guns Less Crime is required reading for anyone who wants to be honest about preventing the death of innocent Americans.

Anonymous said...

Further regarding RayB's comments at 4:20 PM...

RayB is HARDLY the first to name call that which more closely follows God's ways than he does:

"However, I admit to you that in accordance with the Way, which they call a 'HERESY', I worship the God of our ancestors and believe in EVERYTHING written in the LAW and the Prophets!"


"I admit that I follow the Way, which they call a 'CULT'."


This would be a good time to mention to new visitors:

RayB promotes the SATANIC doctrine of LAWLESSNESS.

And keep in mind, one of Satan's favorite tricks is to provide SOME truth ... often a lot of truth ... that is used as a smokescreen to help provide cover for his lies. Christ stated "the TRUTH shall set you free," not "some" truth, but THE TRUTH as found only in His Word!

1John 3:4

"Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth ALSO the LAW: for SIN is the TRANSGRESSION of the LAW."

"Everyone who sins breaks God's law, because sin is the SAME as breaking God's law."


Matt 7:22-23

"When the Judgment Day comes, many will say to me, 'Lord, Lord! In your name we spoke God's message, by your name we drove out many demons and performed many miracles!'"

"But I will reply, 'I never knew you. Get away from me, YOU WHO BREAK GOD'S LAWS!'"

"And then I will tell them, 'I never knew you. DEPART FROM ME, you who practice LAWLESSNESS!'"



James 2:26

"For as the body without the spirit is dead, so FAITH WITHOUT WORKS IS DEAD also."


RayB, by the way, never particularly cared about the postings one way or the other until his own particular ox was gored!


Let's find out!


Is It ALL That God Requires for Salvation?

Martin Luther was correct in rejecting the teaching and practice that one could essentially “buy” salvation through donations to a church or physical acts. But his belief in “faith alone” is a serious theological error with lasting impact to this day!

As the apostle James, Jesus’ half brother, points out, belief is POINTLESS unless it is backed up by action and obedience.
Luther’s most lasting legacy is his teaching that justification, being made right before a righteous God, is through faith alone.

One passage that was foundational to his teaching is Romans 3:23-26, where the apostle Paul writes: “…  For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that were previously committed, to demonstrate at the present time His righteousness, that He might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.”

Here Paul presents the good news that our sins are forgiven because of the sacrifice of Jesus Christ, who died for our sins as our substitute. Since no human works can earn God’s forgiveness, then we are justified when we have faith in God’s promise and embrace Christ’s sacrifice for us.

Luther concluded that to be justified, all one has to do is believe in Christ without any corresponding works. He pointed to Paul’s writings in Romans where God promised Abraham descendants in number like the stars in heaven even though Abraham and his wife Sarah were childless and beyond childbearing years. Luther noted that Paul quoted from a passage in Genesis stating, “And he [Abraham] believed in the Lord, and He accounted it to him for righteousness” (Genesis 15:6; quoted in Romans 4:3).

Anonymous said...

For Luther this was an open-and-shut case: Believe and you are justified. Once justified you are saved. Once you are saved, you remain saved without any influence of works—good or bad.

But Luther had a problem. The New Testament book of James teaches that more is needed for justification than mere belief. James, the half brother of Jesus Christ, wrote: “Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead. But someone will say, ‘You have faith, and I have works.’ Show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my works. You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe—and tremble! But do you WANT to know, O FOOLISH MAN, that FAITH WITHOUT WORKS IS DEAD?” (James 2:17-20).

In his Preface to the Epistles of St. James and St. Jude, Luther claimed that the writer of James’ letter is “in direct opposition to St. Paul, and all the rest of the Bible, it ascribes justification to works …” (Martin Luther: Selections from His Writings, John Dillenberger, ed., 1962, p. 35).

And that’s not all James penned that bothered Luther. James wrote: “Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered Isaac his son on the altar? Do you see that faith was working together with his works, and by works faith was made perfect? And the Scripture was fulfilled which says, ‘Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.’ And he was called the friend of God. You see then that a man is justified by works, and NOT BY FAITH ONLY” (James 2:21-24).

Luther saw Paul and James as incompatible. “Scripture alone” was one of Luther’s guiding principles, but now he struggled with Scripture when it didn’t meet his understanding. He ultimately branded the epistle of James “an epistle of straw” that he felt like “throwing … into the stove” and wrote that he doubted that it truly belonged in the Bible at all.

(Luther’s Works, E.T. Bachmann, ed., 1960, vol. 35, p. 362, and vol. 34, p. 317)

Are Paul And James Incompatible?

Luther believed that Paul and James were promoting two different and incompatible ways to be justified. But are they really?

The answer lies in the way both writers used the example of Abraham. Paul was writing to the church in Rome to explain how both Jews and gentiles can come into a relationship with God. Both are justified by God’s grace and faith in the work of Christ. Paul clearly teaches that no one can earn God’s favor because of their good works. Abraham was justified because he believed in God’s promises.

James, however, was dealing with a somewhat different problem. James was addressing the wrong idea that mere belief constitutes living faith. Remember, he wrote that Satan and the demons believe in God and fear His awesome power and glory. James made it clear that our faith must be much more than Satan’s belief! Faith involves completely trusting God, and trusting God is a motivation for obedience.

Anonymous said...

Think about James’ argument. Abraham believed God’s promise that his son Isaac would give him descendants. Then God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son. God’s promise and command for obedience seemed inconsistent to say the least.

What if Abraham would have said to God: “I believe your promise to give me descendants through Isaac, and since that can’t happen if I sacrifice him, I have decided to disobey you. But I still believe in your promise!”

James argued that if Abraham had refused to obey God, his belief would not have been real faith. If a person truly trusts God, then his actions will be rooted in that trust.

We can’t erase our own sins or impress God enough to earn salvation. We must also not fall into the trap of thinking that belief is all God requires. Faith must submit to God’s working in us. In this submission, real living faith produces works. Paul is correct in teaching that human beings can’t earn justification but must have faith in Christ. James is also correct in teaching that faith without works is dead—useless and empty because it doesn’t really change the person.

Moreover, Paul himself said that “the doers of the law will be justified” (Romans 2:13) —that is, made right before God. We must understand that we receive initial justification from God whenever we repent, apart from any deeds of obedience (Romans 3:28). But remaining justified before God is conditioned upon continuing to actively obey Him. There is NO contradiction!

VIDEO - Martin Luther: The UNFINISHED Reformation


Anonymous said...


J said...


For the record I have read and agreed with most of your recent comments, although I haven't read the Romanism and the Refromation book. It's often easier to focus on where I disagree than where I agree. I don't usually express agreement online.

You and I are not so insecure that we need everybody to agree with us and like us or else we crumble. I like about you that you respond with arguments, not insults, and you don't hold grudges.

And, Happy New Year.

My hope for the New Year for this blog is that people on this blog can debate theological differences of opinion without calling their debate opponent Satanic, a Pharisee, or other over-the-top insults as a substitute for being able to make their own strongest argument against their debate opponent's true strongest argument.

Anonymous said...


You seem to enjoy debate/argument, whatever. It kind of makes you annoying. Its better to be in agreement with like minded believers, than it is to make constant posts were your at odds with everyone. You make rediculous statements about a poster, then you soften, and pretend to be the peacemaker. You would make a great politician!!! Perhaps limit your posts to once a week like Christine, and spend the rest of your time doing something else.

Anonymous said...

Is it necessary to be "on the record" as J having read our posts, and to what degree she is in agreement with them? Perhaps you can judge everyone's posts here on a one to ten scale. Kinda like China's social credit system. πŸ‘πŸ˜‡πŸ˜‡πŸ˜‡

Your input here is greatly needed, and deeply appreciated by everyone!πŸ˜€

Anonymous said...

My hope for the year 2020 for this blog is that people on this blog can learn to distinguish between someone calling a DOCTRINE Satanic and a PERSON Satanic.

And incidentally, as far as the claim that RayB "doesn't hold a grudge" and "doesn't respond with insults", as one 'famous' example, he implied Christine was horrible-looking, the "stuff of nightmares" after she criticized him and he subsequently refused repeated attempts by Craig and others to hold him to account for his vicious remarks other than to ask Craig "Don't you have a sense of humor?" to which Craig responded "I found nothing remotely funny about your remarks about her (looks)."

J said...

Anonymous 11:11,

RayB's sustained pattern is that he mostly ignores insults and provides arguments and information. I agree that insulting Christine in that way was not Christian, but I also understand why she is frustrating and how even a Christian could slip up. None of us is perfect, and I didn't say RayB always is.

Your characterization of RayB's doctrine as Satanic lawlessness is not a fair or accurate characterization.

I will respond because I feel responsible for witnessing since I was raised in Herbert W. Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God.

I don't suppose myself to be so well schooled in theology as to teach others so I will limit myself to describing my personal experience in the hope it will be evidence of the fruit of the doctrines of Armstrongism.

I spent my adulthood as an atheist and when I returned to God my old beliefs were like boxes in the basement, boxes I had little time to sort through to decide what to keep, what to throw out, and what to go out and shop for.

I had enough time and enough sense (or enough guidance from the Holy Spirit) to at least pick up the Bible and read through the New Testament for Jesus' words and examples and hold onto those basics as the gold standard that nothing else in the Bible or human tradition can contradict. If anything seems to contradict it like fine print, that's not how God works, that's how Satan works, and that was my exact thoughts in my brain at the time, and it's not aimed at you or anybody else. That thought was my rock while I was in a weakened and transitional status, and while I was still angry at my image of the God of the Old Testament, although not angry at Jesus.

After a while as more time went by and I had more interaction with other Christians, I realized I did not understand the New Covenant, Grace or other basic theological concepts. I realized I didn't understand will; I didn't understand that human beings have will but not free will. I didn't understand that our wills are enslaved to corruption until we are saved. I didn't understand sanctification -- that we don't exactly choose to obey out of our own free will -- that we become able to freely obey once we are given that freedom within grace as a gift. I still don't think I full understand, but we are told to meditate on God's Word. It's very beautiful that God could have made us like robots or slaves, but instead He wants us to freely love him, and when we love Him, we can't help but want to obey Him, too. This is quite a different concept than the concept I learned in my childhood. An aunt overheard me saying repeatedly at age three when I was just learning to talk, "If you don't go to church on the sabbath, you will burn in the lake of fireeeee!" She thought it was cute the way I pronounced "fire" but wondered what on Earth I was being taught. I have no memory of it at all.

Now, I realize there are splinter groups that may be different than the original Worldwide Church of God, so if your theology is not as mine was, then of course I will listen to your clarification.

Anonymous said...

Yes, please clarify!

Anonymous said...

boxes in the basement, toys in the attic

Anonymous said...

"It's very beautiful that God could have made us like robots or slaves, but instead He wants us to freely love him, and when we love Him, we can't help but want to obey Him, too"
Saved and justified at that very instant I or you (anyone) repented and believed Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God, has paid for our redemption by His merciful sacrifice (repenting is really part of believing amen?) and then sanctified, the lifetime that takes in this walk of faith, because the indwelling Holy Spirit has made us His charge, to grow in God's marvelous grace, to make us like Jesus. We are to be image bearers, and rightly represent Him from then on. I personally have a ways to go, but thankfully I am not where I was when the Lord found me! We all have many things to un-learn, frankly speaking, in order to live as God wants us to, created us to. I am glad God is patient, as I am not, often not with myself either, let alone others....but....I pray to be. I pray (and at the same time willfully willingly choose by surrendering to His right to own me for I was bought at a price) so heart and mind and body too are to obey that I may love the Lord more today than I did yesterday, and live like I mean it! Lots of forgiving and being forgiven I notice.
We are all pieces of work...
I am so glad God is into the process and does not abandon His workmanship. So back unto the Potter's Wheel I go for another go-round. Truly, I would have left me in the dust long time ago if I was the Lord...BUT HE is GOD and I am not. Hallelujah!

Anonymous said...

J@11:42 AM

Thank you for sharing that about your personal life.

My position is that we must strive to understand as accurately as possible what God relates to us via His words in the Bible (including to strive to thusly so live as it indicates).

And I most certainly do NOT abide serious abuse(s) of authority be it in a public, private or church group or organization.

That includes serious mind-control technique usage.

I NEVER post anything linked to certain offshoots of the WWCG (nor in general) to those that practice such and THAT is why.

So then, to clarify: As in any field there are better ones and worse ones.

STAY AWAY from the worse ones!

I am furious that some 'Christian' church leaders (in whatever denominations) have seriously abused their authority and it is incumbent upon us to endeavor to as much as possible ameliorate the damage such abuses have resulted in so that the victims are not lost to the wonderfully fulfilling life in Christ Jesus that they would otherwise be already enjoying!

And it is unfortunate that, INSTEAD of simply posting theological points of his understanding that might be different than something that I may post (which is, of course, what he SHOULD do) RayB initiates needlessly less-than-pleasant dialogues by resorting to name calling 'cult', etc., and I find it ironically amusing when I hear RayB malign thus when I happen to HATE culticness with a passion! It is NOT my goal, as he has claimed, to get people to join a 'cult' by undertaking the process of learning to think for oneself and open-mindedly, logically and objectively as a second nature: It is, in fact, the EXACT OPPOSITE! It will make one FAR More resistant to undue influences! AND (with God's help) help one UNDO undue influence's damage already done! If leader Joe Shmoe has taught 99+% correct doctrines BUT he has ALSO seriously abused his authority it will be like "water off a duck's back" and the BEHAVIOR will be SEPARATELY COMPARTMENTALIZED FROM THE DOCTRINAL TEACHINGS. The 'baby' will NOT be thrown out with the bathwater and the person will not have rejected the good Christian teachings themselves!

My goal is to help others to be more and more Godlike as we advance in age and experience and anything(s) that we can share with each other to advance that goal is a vital part of what it's all about!

Have a nice day.

RayB said...


Regarding your 9:02 AM post ...

Thank you for your very kind words.

However, one slight clarification; I did not make any statement, either directly or indirectly regarding Christine's "looks." Nor is it true, as "Anonymous" states that "Craig" took me to task for making "personal attacks against Christine's looks."

If "Anonymous" (or anyone else for that matter) can prove that I did, they can easily go back into the archives and copy and paste where I "made fun of Christine's looks." Don't hold your proverbial breath on that one, because nothing of the sort exists.

Regarding the video, what I found "nightmarish" was in what Christine PROCLAIMS. Quite frankly, most of what Christine posts here I find to be "nightmarish," to that I plead guilty. However, I repeat; I did not make a single statement regarding Christine's looks.

I might be wrong about this, but I don't believe you were visiting this site during the time when Christine had free rein to post whatever amount she wanted. Back then, she would often post dozens of posts per day, many at great length, and many contained vulgar language along with personal attacks against anyone the dared to disagree with her, on ANY SUBJECT. It got to the point where it became so bad that numerous people complained about it to Constance. Constance responded by limiting her to one post per week.

I usually don't bother responding to personal attacks, but felt this needed clarification due to "Anonymous" constantly, ad nauseam, bringing it up.

RayB said...


I found your post @ 11:42 AM to be extremely interesting.

We share a lot of the same type of experiences in our spiritual journey!

It never ceases to amaze me as to the amount of ongoing grace that God extends to His people, and how He provides us with the knowledge and understanding according to His timing, not ours. Your personal account is an excellent illustration of that.

Here is something to meditate upon .... we in Christ are rich beyond all imagination. These are promises that all the world's riches could not buy !

Romans 8:35-39

35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?

36 As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.

37 Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us.

38 For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,

39 Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Anonymous said...

"I did not make a single statement regarding Christine's looks."

"nothing of the sort exists."


You sure about that?

ESPECIALLY since you repeatedly REFUSED numerous requests by Craig and others to address exactly what you meant about your remarks which CERTAINLY looked like an ad hominem implied attack on Christine's looks...

Until NOW.

And which 'explanation' by the way I find...

(How shall I phrase this?)

...let's say a tad less than 100% easily believable, according to the way you phrased your remarks below:

Anonymous 1:34 AM

seeing the heresies chugged out by Ray B and Paul lately, this stuff is too urgent to let slip


RayB 10:16 AM

Anon @ 1:34 AM ...

Don't you think you would have been providing a service to humanity had you issued a stern WARNING associated with your link?

If I have nightmares over this, I'm holdin you responsible !

Craig 12:14 PM

RayB @ 10:16 AM,

To what do you refer when you state, Don't you think you would have been providing a service to humanity had you issued a stern WARNING associated with your link? Why is a "WARNING" needed here? What about that link might give you nightmares? You are not afraid of being direct here on this blog site, so let's 'hear' it.

RayB 4:03 PM

Wow Craig ... don't you have even the slightest drop of humor running through your veins?

Anonymous 6:18 PM

No, Craig was probably just wondering whether you are a hypocrite:

"RayB 9:01 AM

"On a personal note, I would caution you not to make personal attacks on anyone. While you are entitled to point out errors on MCE's posts, based on Biblical authority, I firmly believe that personal attacks are not according to God's will and needs to be repented of."

(From the 'Barbara Bush 1926-2018 Fond Memorances' thread.)

Craig 11:33 PM

Anon 6:18 PM,

Thank you for finding that. I didn’t recall those particular words, and I’m not sure I even read them the first time. But they sure are apt here.



If nothing else you are quite adept at deflection. In the most recent case here, when I confronted you about what I—and Anon 6:18 PM—perceived as ad hominem (literally, “against the man” [gender non-specific; i.e. “human”]), rather than admit it, you deflect by asking about my sense of humor. Well, I do have a sense of humor, yet I didn’t find your comment in the least bit funny.

In the comment in question @ 10:16 AM, rather than address the substance of the statement @ 1:34 AM, or the video at that link, you instead posted the ad hominem against the person in the video link—Christine.

I direct you to your comments @ 12:25 PM and 10:55 AM regarding my supposed “psychological deflection”. I’m sure I’m not the only one to see this—in Alinskyan fashion—as the very thing you were doing...

Anonymous 11:44 AM


You shouldn't have let those 3 questions of Craig's go unaddressed:

#1) To what do you refer when you state, "Don't you think you would have been providing a service to humanity had you issued a stern WARNING associated with your link?"

#2) Why is a "WARNING" needed here?

#3) What about that link might give you nightmares?


Craig said...


The relevant portion of this conversation related to the charge above (@ 11:11 AM) of ad hominem relating to Christine can be found between the dotted lines below as from this link here: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?postID=1493201844006862879&blogID=11772087&isPopup=false&page=2&bpli=1

Anonymous said...

seeing the heresies chugged out by Ray B and Paul lately, this stuff is too urgent to let slip


1:34 AM

RayB said...

Anon @ 1:34 AM ...

Don't you think you would have been providing a service to humanity had you issued a stern WARNING associated with your link?

If I have nightmares over this, I'm holdin you responsible !

10:16 AM

Craig said...

RayB @ 10:16 AM,

To what do you refer when you state, Don't you think you would have been providing a service to humanity had you issued a stern WARNING associated with your link? Why is a "WARNING" needed here? What about that link might give you nightmares? You are not afraid of being direct here on this blog site, so let's 'hear' it.

12:14 PM
RayB said...

Wow Craig ... don't you have even the slightest drop of humor running through your veins?

4:03 PM

Contained in the first “Anonymous” (@ 1:34 AM) is a video by Christine centering on the subject of the Filioque. Since your claim @ 2:23 PM just above is that you were commenting on the content and not on the person, please explain what exactly was potentially nightmare-inducing in the proclamations made in that video?

Craig said...


To my 3:13 PM comment I need to add: How does 'humor' fit into all this?

RayB said...

Wow !!!!


What I found "humorous" and "nightmarish" about Christine's video was her usual, endless rantings all while puffing away on her cigarette.

You would think, judging by "Annonymous's" and "Craig's" reaction to my harmless post, that I committed the unpardonable sin !!!

TOO FUNNY .... but .... Happy New Year to the both of you.

BY THE WAY .... YOU TWO ONLY ASSUME THAT I WAS MAKING FUN OF CHRISTINE'S "looks" .... perhaps the two of you, based on your unfounded assumptions, were "judging" her looks ????

RayB said...

Another thought .....

Do my TWO ACCUSERS believe their "case" against me would stand up in a court of law? ROFL !!!

Any reasonable judge would bounce the two of you out of court as if you were a pair of basketballs ... all based on a "evidence" based entirely upon assumptions.

Anonymous said...

Well since you REPEATEDLY IGNORED NUMEROUS REQUESTS to explain exactly what you meant you can hardly blame others for any supposedly 'incorrect' views they may formed.

Craig said...

For those who may buy RayB's explanation, I've got a few bridges available at fantastic prices...

Anonymous said...


RayB said...

Congratulations Craig,

You are a false accuser, Judge and Jury all rolled into one.

And what's more, all you have to go on is your own fertile imagination.

What a great way for you to start out the New Year.

PS The bridges for sale comment is so original.

Craig said...


If my (and anonymous') position months ago on this issue was so off the mark, then, instead of immediately asking about my sense of humor in regard to your exclamatory statement, why didn't you simply correct the record at that time? Why ignore repeated attempts asking for clarity?

Given your explanation above, the only difference between this particular incident (her usual, endless rantings) and the others was the cigarette smoking (all while puffing away on her cigarette), and the reader here is supposed to believe that this was the reason for such an animated reaction by you?

Anonymous said...

Wanda Sykes: "Stick With Your Lie!"


*Adult language

RayB said...


I am really amazed at the amount of importance that you have assigned to this atom sized issue.

Again, please ... for the record .... copy and paste my exact post whereby I referred to her "looks" as you have claimed.

If you can't do that, you really ought to stop making unfounded accusations.

By the way, I refused to answer your obnoxiously demanding questions regarding this silly incident because I didn't want to honor your efforts with a response. I viewed your questions (and Anonymous's) along the same line as "how many times a week do you beat your wife?" Furthermore, I rightly recognized that you and Anonymous were in full attack mode and NOTHING I said would be accepted by either one of you. Your subsequent actions (along with that of Anonymous) have proven that my assessment was correct.

You need to move on Craig. I'd like to think that you are above this sort of baseless, immature activity.

Anonymous said...

According to the Chinese, this is the year of the rat. They might be right, because the rats have come out in force.

Craig said...


The "immature activity" began with your comment months ago, along with your first ineffectual attempt at deflection related to this by inquiring about my sense of humor--comments that you refuse to acknowledge for what they are/were. Your "explanation" above and your continued deflections are not working either.

Anonymous said...

Craig, why don't you cut and paste RayB's comments for all to see? Post the evidence. Then we can judge for ourselves, any validity to your, and anonymous claim?

Craig said...

Anon 11:03 PM,

I've posted the most salient portion of the conversation @ 3:13 PM above. Draw your own conclusions from that and the associated context here.

Anonymous said...

RayB, to try to compare LEGITIMATE concerns reflected by correspondingly LEGITIMATE questions:

#1) To what do you refer when you state, "Don't you think you would have been providing a service to humanity had you issued a stern WARNING associated with your link?"

#2) Why is a "WARNING" needed here?

#3) What about that link might give you nightmares?

With: "how many times a week do you beat your wife?"

Speaks for itself.

As well as the ACCUSING "NOTHING I said would be accepted by either one of you." when the ACCURATE thing to state would be "No too lame a sounding excuse would likely be automatically accepted by either one of you." as in:

"Given your explanation above, the only difference between this particular incident (her usual, endless rantings) and the others was the cigarette smoking (all while puffing away on her cigarette), and the reader here is supposed to believe that this was the reason for such an animated reaction by you?"

PS The how many times a week do you beat your wife comment is so original.

Anonymous said...

Craig, you are really being a turd over this whole false claim of yours against RayB. You really are a joyless soul.

Craig said...

Moving goalposts:

Note that in RayB’s comment to J @ 2:23 PM he preemptively states:

If "Anonymous" (or anyone else for that matter) can prove that I did, they can easily go back into the archives and copy and paste where I "made fun of Christine's looks." Don't hold your proverbial breath on that one, because nothing of the sort exists.

Regarding the video, what I found "nightmarish" was in what Christine PROCLAIMS. Quite frankly, most of what Christine posts here I find to be "nightmarish," to that I plead guilty. However, I repeat; I did not make a single statement regarding Christine's looks.

As regards the first paragraph, well, no, RayB never made any overtly obvious statement, and no one claimed he did (one moved goalpost). In the second paragraph, his claim was specifically: what I found "nightmarish" was in what Christine PROCLAIMS.

In response to that, I posted the relevant conversation (@ 3:13 PM), and then asked: Since your claim @ 2:23 PM just above is that you were commenting on the content and not on the person, please explain what exactly was potentially nightmare-inducing in the proclamations made in that video? I added a follow-up comment just below that (@ 3:16 PM) asking how humor fit in.

Yet, in his response (@ 4:51 PM) he makes no specific mention of any proclamations at all (another moved goalpost), stating:

What I found "humorous" and "nightmarish" about Christine's video was her usual, endless rantings all while puffing away on her cigarette.

Any reader can view my response to this @ 8:11 PM above.

All this was interspersed and bracketed by numerous deflections by my interlocutor.

Of course, somewhat similar to the idiom “beauty is in the eye of the beholder”, regarding the written word “interpretation is in the mind of the reader”. Any reader can make his/her own mind up on this matter. Maybe smoking a cigarette while ‘ranting’ (RayB’s word) can be construed as what Christine PROCLAIMS. And maybe this is really what he meant all along. As for me, I find his ‘explanations’ extremely wanting. Your mileage may vary.

Anonymous said...

Very well noticed and explained, Craig.

I think that that was a great way to wrap up for this topic!

Anonymous said...

Nearly ten years ago I had a profile on Plenty of Fish. Most of the women I corresponded with lived in other parts of the U.S. For the most part it was just nice having someone to communicate with. On occasion I chatted with a few of them by Skype. Durring one such Skype chat, the woman said "I'm going to step away for a moment so I'm going to turn this off". She must have forgotten to turn off the camera, as I think that's what she meant. Well she forgot to turn it off, and I saw her lean over and search for something near floor level. Soon she popped up and stuck a cigarette in her mouth, prop her self up with her elbows on the table and light the thing. Well, that placed her face so as to take up most of the screen. That sight is still etched on my mind. Not a lovely sight! My profile said 'non smoking Christian male'. So she must not have read it. Some people like myself hate cigarettes, and think the sight, especially of a woman, smoking, is gross! So, I can understand RayB thinking Christine "puffing away on her cigarette" an unpleasant sight. Nightmarish might be an exaggeration, but it hardly merits the attack that you an anonymous have undertaken against RayB. It's childish actually!

Anonymous said...

Nice try 5:14 AM

Just wrap it up. That's a take! Nothing more to see here. Move along!

Anonymous said...

Yes, let it be an ENDLESS CYCLE!

Anonymous said...

Julian Assange Is Being Tortured To Death:

"I'm Dying Here!"


Anonymous said...

The Daily Bell

Nullify Government Tyranny: In 2020, Harness the Power of Your Discontent - 59 Hours Ago

6 Reasons for Optimism in 2020 - 83 Hours Ago

America’s Sovereign States: The Obscure History of How 10 Independent States Joined the U.S. - 83 Hours Ago

See more The Daily Bell news...


Anonymous said...

Blacklisted News

Netanyahu asks for immunity from prosecution in corruption cases - 29 Hours Ago

The UN Is Hiring DISARMAMENT OFFICERS in New York - 29 Hours Ago

UK politician who lobbied for gender-neutral bathroom charged with child sex abuse - 29 Hours Ago


Anonymous said...

USA Today Op-Ed on Church Shooting: 'Terrifying' That Parishioners Were Armed!


As We Enter 2020, Christians Are Increasingly On the Menu of the New World Order! Where Is Your Pastor?


Anonymous said...

Harbingers Daily

Dr. Robert Jeffress: Until the Lord Returns, Evil is a Reality that must be Confronted - 8 Hours Ago

Abortion was Leading Cause of Death Worldwide in 2019, Killing 42 Million People - 12 Hours Ago

Chinese Pastor Sentenced to 9 Years in Prison Amid Renewed Persecution - 33 Hours Ago


Anonymous said...

Gun Confiscation By Government And How To Counter It


Anonymous said...

Natural News

RED ALERT: Internet to be “policed” by communist China under new UN crackdown targeting online speech - 7 Hours Ago

The Drag Queen Shows For Children movement gains momentum:

Drag Queens now performing “pre-shows” at STAR WARS movie theater showings - 7 Hours Ago


Anonymous said...

Chinese State Run Outlet Blasts U.S. Gun Ownership

A Chinese state-run media outlet published an article criticizing private gun ownership in the United States after armed parishioners took down an active shooter at a church in White Settlement, Texas on Sunday.

In an article titled “Gun ownership, deaths out of control in US,” an outlet run by the Chinese Communist Party’s People’s Daily newspaper defined the problem as gun ownership ITSELF, calling the right to bear arms enshrined in the Second Amendment a “SEVERE…FLAW.”

J said...


I understood intuitively, immediately, why you didn't want to dignify the attacks with a defense. I suspect many others understood it as well. I had forgotten about it but now I remember it, and although I'm a woman and I don't like women being judged only on superficial appearance, it never occurred to me to take it the way that Craig and Anonymous are taking it.

I find it strange for Craig to be the white knight for Christine in this matter. I recall a time I quoted from Rose McGowan's book writing about an incident where her arm snapped during a shoot of a movie, and she had nerve pain ever since. His response was that he didn't care because she was just another woman playing victim, then playing empowered.

I have also frequently noticed Craig being endlessly patient and polite with Christine and always answering her every argument and point with great and careful labor, while he ignored both you and I many times when we wanted some of our points and arguments addressed or questions answered in past discussions.

I don't know what to make of it, but it screams of bad faith, not sincerity.

J said...

P.S. We're all tired of victim thinking -- but personally I'm also tired of people only pretending to care about victims (whether real or imagined victims) whenever they think they can weaponize their faux concern against their opponent. Thinking mainly of politics and media, but it perhaps rubs off on the people, too. It's really no way to help real victims when everybody treats it like it's only a game.

Anonymous said...


"I don't know what to make of it, but it screams of bad faith, not sincerity."

"people only pretending to care about victims"

"faux concern"

I have occasionally wondered whether she is a sugar-coated troll who enoys 'stirring the pot'.

I think I just got my answer.

Anonymous said...

boxes in the basement, toys in the attic

RayB said...

Craig says @ 12:52 AM (in part):

"Maybe smoking a cigarette while ‘ranting’ (RayB’s word) can be construed as what Christine PROCLAIMS. And maybe this is really what he meant all along. As for me, I find his ‘explanations’ extremely wanting."


Maybe this will help you in your "extremely wanting" problem.

The link to Christine's video was originally posted without identifying it. As I recall, it had a sub title along the lines of "answering heresies," etc. When I went to the link, I watched it for a total of about 2 minutes.

Why? Because I don't take seriously anything Christine has to say based upon what I know about her, all based upon the voluminous posts of her past. Those posts were often filled with personal attacks upon anyone and everyone that had the audacity to disagree with her on even a minor detail. She has often used vulgarity and has enthusiastically made arguments in favor of "living in sin," going so far as to justify her sinful rebellion by attempting to use the Bible to excuse it. She has numerous far out and weird beliefs (such as her desire to evangelize Martians), and was so obnoxious on this blog that a number of people here made requests to Constance that she be banned from this site entirely. Constance responded by making the unusual move to limit her posts to one per week.

When I saw Christine pontificating her usual nonsense while puffing away on her cigarette, that was the cap stone.

This is the person that you have used as a battering ram to attack me. I think there is something going on here that is far deeper.

I may or may not have been right to post what I thought was a humorous response. However, I did NOT mean it as an attack on her or on her, or as you claimed, her "looks."

You have attacked my character, based SOLELY on your assumption that my humorous response was in reference to her "looks," which is completely and utterly false. You have accused me of being a "hypocrite," and a "liar" (because you continue to question my word), etc. That is on you.

I am not seeking an apology from you. I forgive you for your unjust treatment. With all the problems that the world faces, I think there are bigger fish to fry than this !

RayB said...

To Anon @ 5:39 AM ...

Thank you for your kind comments and understanding of this "childish" issue.


You are like a breath of fresh air.

Of course you are already aware that if you speak the truth in here, you will be attacked (as evidenced by Anonymous's 8:32 AM post).

Craig said...

Tony Heller, in his newest vlog, highlights two tweets by Trump pre-Presidency that I’d had no idea about. So glad Trump paid attention to Climategate. These begin at 3:58 below:

Newly released emails prove that scientists have manipulated data on global warming. The data is unreliable. (11/30/2011)

The above references a WSJ article related to Climategate 2.0. Then on 11/01/2012 he tweeted:

Let’s continue to destroy competitiveness of our factories & manufacturing so we can fight mythical global warming. China is so happy!

Recycling The Climate Crisis

J said...


Thank you. Did you notice that the attacks happened right when we were having meaningful discussion?

Anonymous said...

8:36 AM,,,,I have also "wondered" if J was a "sugar-coated troll, and perhaps she is? But in her 7:50 AM + 8:02 AM posts, she is spot on!

RayB said...


Because the whole thing is more than childish, I didn't pay too much attention to it. However, I must admit, the thought passed my mind as to what brought all this up again. Your explanation does seem to fit. It must be YOUR fault ! LOL !!

Anonymous said...

J said...

"I don't know what to make of it, but it screams of bad faith, not sincerity."

"people only pretending to care about victims"

"faux concern"

RayB said to J...

"you speak the truth"

Congratulations J & RayB,

You two are perilously close to being (if not in fact being) false accusers, Judges and Jury all rolled into one.

And what's more, all you have to go on is your own fertile imaginations.

What a great way for you to start out the New Year.

Anonymous said...

So what has wedged in the craw of Massa Craig, to greatly increase his buttholeiness?

Anyone care to debate?

RayB said...

Prominent Jesuit Priest Accused of Abusing Boy More Than 1,000 Times

Jesuit Priest Donald J. McGuire was serving a 25 year Federal prison sentence for being a serial child sex abuser when he died in 2017. This past Monday, a new suit was filed in California on behalf of the victim. The law suit names the Jesuit order that McGuire belonged to along with the San Francisco Diocese.

What's also interesting is the fact that McGuire was the "spiritual adviser" and "Father Confessor" to none other than Mother Theresa in Calcutta. In spite of McGuire's long, documented history of child sex abuse, Saint Mother Theresa continued to support him. In 1994, St. Teresa of Calcutta wrote a letter to McGuire's superior, the Jesuit provincial, supporting Fr. McGuire and refusing to believe abuse allegations against him.

Father McGuire had a long history of alleged abuse throughout his priestly ministry:

Sexual abuse in Austria and Germany in the 1960s

Abusing a boy at Loyola Academy in Wilmette, Illinois in 1968

Molesting two boys at Loyola Academy in 1972 (McGuire was later convicted in 2006 on these allegations)

Repeatedly abusing a boy in Phoenix, Arizona and Barrington, Illinois from 1988–1994, beginning when the victim was nine years old

Abusing five minors while stationed at Canisius House in Evanston, Illinois, 1989–2003

As is typical, the RCC continued to provide cover for this child molester. In their standard operating procedure, the RCC kept transferring him into other locations, where he continued on with his criminal abuse.

Here's the full story as reported by Church Militant:


Anonymous said...

It seems Anonymous @ 10:48 AM is a buttholeiness buddy of Massa Craig, of painfully wedged craw fame!!!!!!

Anonymous said...



Anonymous said...

The National Sentinel

Trump effect: Vast majority of Americans believe their lives will be better in 2020 - -92 Minutes Ago

Left-wing media jazzed about Bernie’s 4th-quarter fundraising but…Trump trumped him (by a lot) - -62 Minutes Ago

DiGenova blasts Obama admin ‘coup leaders’ against Trump: ‘To what extent is the CIA involved in... - -35 Minutes Ago

A Democrat finally admits what we all knew: Party was prepping to impeach Trump before he was elected - -1 Minutes Ago

Oh, look: Biden wants to stack the Supreme Court with women who hate the Constitution - 16 Hours Ago

Giuliani says he’d testify in Trump impeachment trial but he’d REALLY prefer to try it himself - 21 Hours Ago

For the record: The fake news media lied again, as Trump did NOT ‘play golf’ during Baghdad embassy assault - 21 Hours Ago

As Leftist sickos cheered for Iranian militants to kill Americans in Baghdad, Trump acted to prevent another... - 22 Hours Ago

NRA: ‘First weeks critical’ in fight to save gun rights in Virginia; is a showdown looming with Democrats? - 22 Hours Ago

Once again, the Leftist claims about conservative economic policies are proven WRONG thanks to Trump - 42 Hours Ago

Proof that Barack Obama’s buddies in Iran are behind the U.S. embassy attack in Iraq - 42 Hours Ago

Looks like there’s a proxy war brewing in Iraq between the U.S. and Iran - 44 Hours Ago

CNN had yet another dismal year as Fox News dominated again - 46 Hours Ago

If you’re a blue collar worker, Joe Biden is coming after your job — and he’s making that very plain - 47 Hours Ago


Anonymous said...

President Trump May Be Walking Into A Globalist Trap: With Iranian Sleeper Cells Across America, War Against Iran May Be A Globalist Ploy To Unleash Death And Destruction Here

Iran Running War Games With Russia And China Hints Of Trouble Ahead


Anonymous said...

His Mask Falls Off – The REAL Face Of Pope Francis

Tonight after visiting the Nativity scene in St. Peter’s Square, Pope Francis loses his cool after being grabbed by a worshipper who wouldn’t let go. The Pope repeatedly slaps her and offers angry words.


Anonymous said...

ANALYSIS: Virginia Gov. Northam may soon need TEN THOUSAND body bags for his State Police and National Guard troops, since “Biblical MAYHEM” will be unleashed following any gun confiscation attempt!

January 02, 2020 By: Mike Adams
Natural News

If Virginia’s child-murdering Governor Ralph “Blackface” Northam wants to get a head start on the civil war he’s unleashing in his own state, he had better order around 10,000 body bags for the Virginia State Police and Virginia National Guard troops he will condemn to die in a state-wide civil war, concludes an analysis from several authors, including AmericanPartisan.org 
writer Matt Bracken.

“…there will be armed resistance,” warns Bracken in his excellent analysis article. “If and when widespread gun confiscation begins, even under the cover of so-called “red flag” laws, or following the refusal of Virginians to comply with gun registration mandates, there will be a civil war.”

Any effort to transform hundreds of thousands of Virginians into instant “paper felons” by criminalizing all the guns they’ve legally purchased over the years will end in disaster for Virginia Democrats and any law enforcement officials who are foolish enough to go along with the Democrats’ tyranny. As Bracken states, law enforcement convoys will be targeted as they attempt to carry out gun confiscation missions:

The geography and topography of much of Virginia means that convoys of police cars and SUVs on gun confiscation missions will be forced to travel through labyrinthine terrain on their way to and from their objectives.

In addition, there are not enough law enforcement helicopters in Virginia to protect these hypothetical columns of police cars and SUVs heading out to confiscate weapons that were perfectly legal for Virginians to own until now. The day that state LE helicopters are used to support gun raids, these helicopters, their bases and their supporting elements will become targets.

There are around 7500 members of the Virginia National Guard, according to Bracken, and 2,100 members of the Virginia State Police. Both groups are extremely lacking in ammunition, and many of the personnel are administrative or support personnel. The actual number of armed, trained and physically fit members of the National Guard and State Police who could even attempt to conduct armed raids against the citizens of Virginia is probably no more than a few hundred in total.

“Other than a handful of MPs, none have training for this process. Even if you squint hard at qualifications and add a few others, the actual number of troops qualified to do this is a few HUNDRED at most,” writes Michael Z. Williamson on his blog site. “The National Guard does not keep ammo on hand in any relevant quantities.  A small amount for training is it.”

“To put the maximum numbers of hypothetically available gun confiscators into perspective, remember that Virginia has a population of 8.5 million people spread over 43,000 square miles,” writes Bracken:

But just for the sake of discussion, let’s assume that Northam attempted to enforce his gun confiscation and/or mandatory registration laws, and an armed resistance began. How have previous modern insurgencies fared against government forces? Please consider that from the 1980s until today, the full might of the Soviet and later the U.S. military has not been able to subdue a few thousand rag-tag Taliban fighters in Afghanistan, not even when the counter-insurgency troops were operating from secure fire bases located far away from their homes and families. During a civil war in Virginia, the homes and families of the gun confiscators will be scattered among those whose guns they will be tasked with confiscating. Not a pretty picture to contemplate, particularly in an era when doxing can readily be used as a weapon to identify and “out” perceived enemies. And if resistors are afraid to post the information on the internet, just picture leaflets scattered around a neighborhood identifying the gun confiscators.

This WOULD happen.

COUNT on it.

Anonymous said...

Biblical mayhem will be unleashed on those foolish enough to try to take the guns away from Virginians by force!

“Congrats, jerkwad!” writes Michael Z Williamson in response to Virginia Dems that are threatening to use the National Guard against the citizens of Virginia. “You’ve actually threatened to have the military repress people, and you’re surprised that they’re going to oppose you? EVERYONE should be opposing you. It’s outrageous of itself, and and outrageous precedent if allowed.”

He goes on to state what we’re all thinking: “Not to put too fine a point on it, but there should be politicians hanging from lampposts over this.”

Williamson goes on to point out that under federal law, Virginia National Guard troops cannot be issued federally-funded weapons or ammunition, meaning the State of Virginia will have to allocate funds itself to arm the murderous troops that are ordered to go door to door, arresting or executing the “Second Amendment terrorists” who refuse to turn in their guns. Most members of the Virginia National Guard, under such circumstances, will find a reason to not show up. As Williamson writes:

If you try to make them do so, most are going to refuse. Good. Because the last time some states took this direction, they got put down hard. This isn’t an earthquake, a foreign attack, or even an out of control football riot. You’re asking to use military force to attack US citizens for code violations.

If by some freak of circumstances you get some small number to do so, people are going to die. Given how many veterans are among the population, and there’s an entire network of retired special operators and CIA types in that area, the mayhem might even be BIBLICAL.

He concludes: “Buy more guns. Buy them legally. Buy them privately if you can. Buy more, more, and yet more.”

Anonymous said...

In your dreams, Dems:

18-man team to confiscate guns across 43,000 acres of rugged country?

According to news that broke earlier today in the Washington Examiner, Virginia’s Governor Northam is requesting new funding to hire a grand total of 18 officers to form a gun confiscation “team.” The budget for this suicide squad? $4.8 million, presumably most of it going to funeral expenses should anyone be foolish enough to actually declare war on Virginia’s gun owners with nothing more than an 18-man team of armed, clueless, jack-booted thugs.

My guess is that these 18 men will last about 18 HOURS or less, should they try to carry out what Democrats really want.

Perhaps Dems should budget for MULTIPLES of $4.8 million, since they’re going to need backup teams, and backups of the backups. Heck, by the time Virginia’s lone hunters are done dealing with these authoritarian, gun-grabbing lunatics, the Governor will need emergency funding for rope cutters to cut down all the traitors who are swinging from lampposts.

The entire point of the Second Amendment is to stop people like Democrat Gov. Northam and his political mafia of left-wing lunatics and treasonous tyrants. And the only reason they want to take all the guns away from the great people of Virginia is because Northam plans to do something the people of Virginia might shoot him for attempting.

Hopefully cooler heads will prevail in all this, but the people of Virginia should not give an inch on gun control. Any restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms is flat-out treason. And that means there are already a long list of treasonous criminals in Richmond who deserve to be indicted, imprisoned and prosecuted for their crimes against Virginia and the United States of America. I keep wondering when the people of Virginia might rise up and go arrest all those traitors, come to think of it…

From all of us in Texas, we send our blessings and cheers to the people of Virginia who are standing against this tyranny. And if it comes to an actual civil war in the hills of Virginia, make no mistake there will be plenty of Texans who will join you in the fight against tyranny.

Read more at:



Anonymous said...

UN hiring “disarmament officers” to conduct “field missions” in New York as UN occupation plan for America goes LIVE

January 02, 2020 By: Mike Adams
Natural News

The critics who have mocked the “UN occupation of America” news that we’ve been covering for years are eating crow today as the United Nations is publicly and openly hiring “disarmament, demobilization and reintegration officers” in New York, specifically admitting that they will be running “field missions” to engage in gun confiscation from citizens.

As this “United Nations Careers” document reveals, the job opening was posted on December 26, 2019 and remains active through February 8, 2020. The job opening number is, “19-Security Institutions-DPO-127453-R-New York (R).”

As the help wanted document explains, these jobs are physically located in New York and demands English proficiency — not French — indicating this job requires engaging with Americans and isn’t some overseas deployment:

This position is located in the Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration (DDR) Section of the Office of Rule of Law and Security Institutions (OROLSI), within the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) in New York. New York is classified as a hardship “H” duty station and family duty station. The incumbent reports to and is under the overall supervision of the DDR Section Chief.

The people who carry out this job are specifically required to operate “two to three missions” carrying out “Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration (DDR)” activities.

DDR is the United Nation’s euphemism for gun confiscation followed by the imprisonment of local populations. This job listing also calls for candidates to, “Conduct field missions to assess implementation of established DDR programmes.”

This position is specifically calling for applicants to have a Master’s degree in “disarmament affairs.” Keep reading to fully understand what the UN means by “DDR” operations.

In summary, gun confiscation in America is about to go HOT.

In 2017, Democrat Richard Boykin called for UN occupation of America with UN troops to be stationed on the streets of U.S. cities

As you learn of this breaking news, don’t forget that just a little over two years ago, Cook County Commissioner Richard Boykin called for UN troops to be stationed on the streets of America. As covered by NewsTarget.com:

Boykin says that UN troops need to be brought into America’s cities as a way to help “victims of violence.”

“I’m hoping to appeal to the UN to actually come to Chicago and meet with victims of violence, and maybe even possibly help out in terms of peacekeeping efforts,” Boykin explains in the video below.

When asked to explain further, he says that armed foreign troops / shock troops are necessary to “protect minority and vulnerable populations.”

He also says that gun violence is a kind of “quiet genocide” that demands a UN presence in America’s cities.

Amazingly, this video hasn’t yet been banned by YouTube, so you can see Boykin saying all this on camera: [Link @ article]

Just a few months ago, radical left-wing Democrat Ilhan Omar also called for the UN occupation of America. Hear the full details in my podcast on Brighteon.com: [Link @ article]

Anonymous said...

“DDR Handbook” of the United Nations spells out what DDR is all about:

What is “DDR,” exactly?

The United Nations defines it as disarming local populations through the use of force. In fact, as part of this “disarmament” operation, the UN runs its own “weapons and ammunition management” operations to make sure UN troops have a monopoly on firepower.

As shown on this page, there’s even a UN handbook for “DDR practitioners” that’s entitled, “Effective Weapons and Ammunition Management in a Changing Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Context.” The overview for the book explains:

It responds to the greater need for arms control activities in disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programmes, including weapons and ammunition management at the community level as part of community violence reduction projects. The material presented here equips DDR practitioners with practical resources to design effective weapons and ammunition management operations that can be implemented across the peace continuum.

Notice the key concepts here? Arms control activities… at the community level… community violence reduction… the “peace continuum.”

This is all globalist doublespeak for gunpoint gun confiscation, and the UN is clearly ramping up this entire operation for the United States of America, starting in New York.

Barack Obama signed the “Arms Trade Treaty” with the UN in 2013, and that’s the basis being invoked for gun confiscation

Another book published under the United Nations’ Office for Disarmament Affairs details how to confiscate guns from local citizens under the “Arms Trade Treaty" which Barack Obama signed in 2013 and which went into force from the UN’s point of view on December 24, 2014. However, President Trump withdrew the United States from this gun control treaty, and the treaty was never ratified by the U.S. Senate. Nevertheless, the UN might argue that since Obama signed it, it remains in force.

This UN book is called, “Disarmament: A Basic Guide – Fourth Edition (2017),” and talks about how to “build a more peaceful world” by disarming citizens through the use of UN weaponry and armed UN soldiers.

In that book, the UN describes firearms in the hands of civilians as causing “armed insecurity,” equating the Second Amendment with terrorism and chaos. The book also claims that small arms in the hands of civilians is equivalent to “excessive accumulation” that “may aggravate political tension.” Indeed, according to the United Nations, peace is only achieved with the raping, child-trafficking UN soldiers have a monopoly on guns.

In other words, the United Nations defines “peace” the same way Adolf Hitler did: By achieving a total monopoly on firepower while the citizens are completely disarmed and unable to defend themselves. That’s exactly what took place during the Third Reich: First disarming the Jews, then carrying out mass genocide to exterminate them. Sounds like a modern-day UN operation!

New York is chosen because there aren’t enough armed citizens to fight off an invading UN enemy force

Notice, too, that this operation is being launched in New York, where gun control laws are already so strict that few citizens will be able to fight back against UN occupation.

This will enable the UN to quickly establish a firepower monopoly and a geographical beachhead from which other operations can be launched, such as gun confiscation raids across New Jersey or other nearby areas.

Meanwhile, Virginia is staging UN vehicles in preparation for an armed assault on Washington D.C. to try to execute President Trump or run him out of office, followed by the installation of Nancy Pelosi as the acting president.

Anonymous said...

As Daisy Luther writes for The Organic Prepper:

You may recall that citizens of Virginia have become outraged recently by new laws that are likely to pass this month, effectively banning all semi-automatic weapons. Sanctuary counties, cities, and municipalities now cover all but the most urban parts of the state. These sanctuaries have vowed to support the Second Amendment and are refusing to enforce unconstitutional gun laws… One has to wonder if this is why the UN is hiring “disarmament officers?”

How many times has someone told you not to worry – that nobody is coming to take your guns away? That all they want is “common-sense gun laws?” In light of the current political climate and this job listing, I’d say that is an outright a lie.

Also see this important article from NationalFile.com: “New York UN Office Recruits Paramilitary Troops for ‘Disarmament’ and ‘Reintegration’ of US Civilians.”

ARM UP, America: You are about to be invaded by a foreign enemy that’s engaged in a massive false flag followed by a kinetic coup attempt against the President

The bottom line here is that events are lining up for an attempted take down of America. First, deep state actors will stage a massive false flag attack that makes Charlottesville look like child’s play. The media will, in concert, blame Trump and call him a white supremacist dictator, then demand his removal from office. When he refuses, the UN will activate its thousands of troops and armored personnel carriers which have already been staged across America.

The gunpoint gun confiscation will begin, and any Americans who refuse to turn over their guns will be shot on sight.

The war is nearly here, and globalists, Democrats and the deep state cannot tolerate Trump winning another election this year and having four more years to prosecute left-wing criminal corruption involving the Bidens, the Clintons and even Barack Obama, himself, who is a criminal traitor and enemy of America.

The very people who are about to be indicted and imprisoned if Durham is allowed to complete his investigation are now cornered rabid animals, willing to do anything to stop the 2020 elections and try to kill Trump or overthrow the nation between now and then. Don’t be surprised if they turn to nuclear, biological or chemical weapons to stage a large-scale, deadly event that can somehow be blamed on Trump.

Anonymous said...

What should rational, informed Americans do right now in preparation for all this? It’s simple: Arm up and prepare to defend your nation using the Second Amendment.

Personally, I recommend improving your proficiency in long-range tactical shooting using calibers such as 300 Win Mag or 338 Lapua Magnum.

338 Lapua Magnum rounds can damage or disable armored vehicles used by enemy forces such as the mad raping UN soldiers. Even better, 50 BMG rounds can seriously damage those vehicles and penetrate hardened cover positions. Right now, you can purchase 660 grain .50 BMG rounds for less than three dollars each (go to Ammoseek.com to find them). Always deploy weapons responsibly, in a manner that’s consistent with the rule of law and the national sovereignty of the United States of America. Yes, we have the right to defend our nation against occupying enemy forces. In fact, millions of our soldiers and law enforcement officers are sworn to do so.

New York will easily fall to UN tyranny, but once the UN soldiers reach rural areas of America, they’re going to find a rifle behind every blade of grass, and a patriot targeting them from every building.

We the People must prepare to bring such heavy metal down upon the occupying enemy UN troops that every last one of them is engaged, defeated and forced to flee our land. This is where history has now brought us, at the precipice of the most important conflict in the history of the United States of America: an invasion by an occupying enemy force. This is “Red Dawn” but with blue helmets. I suppose that makes it, “Blue Dawn,” but either way, the invaders must be eliminated and defeated. There is no other option if America is to survive this globalist assault and a coordinated attempt to carry out a political coup that would nullify democracy and silence the will of the people.

All this looks likely to ramp up this year, in 2020, so your time to prepare is growing very short.

The people of New York, New Jersey and other liberal areas who gave up their guns are soon going to find out what happens when you surrender to a foreign enemy whose troops are known rapists and child traffickers, by the way. There are going to be a whole lot of liberals in New York City who sadly discover why you should never give up your right to self-defense and hand some foreign enemy a monopoly on firearms. Especially not the UN, which is known around the world for mass rapings, child kidnappings and human trafficking.

Why do you think they need a monopoly on firepower in the first place?

It’s because they would normally be shot for their crimes against women and children.

That’s why they disarm populations first!

Get it?


Get the Natural News app:


Anonymous said...

California ORDERS Pastors To Push LGBT Activism… OR ELSE!

Transgender tyranny to become the rule of law.

January 02, 2020
By: Ethan Huff
Natural News

The Golden State has decided to scrap the First Amendment with the passage of a new resolution that FORBIDS religious leaders from opposing homosexuality from the pulpit.

Evan Low and three dozen other members of the California State Assembly were successful in passing ACR 99, as it’s officially called, which dictates that Christian pastors and others MUST AFFIRM the religion of LGBTQ before their congregations, EVEN when doing so violates their own beliefs and convictions!

With the help of Dr. Kevin Mannoia, Azusa Pacific University‘s current chaplain and the former head of the National Association of Evangelicals, ACR 99 passed with flying colors, effectively STAMPING OUT RELIGIOUS FREEDOM in California with the stroke of a pen!



Anonymous said...

Documenting The Virginia Crackdown

By David Lanza

Recent elections in Virginia have placed the Virginia government within arm's length of widespread gun confiscation. Around eighty-four counties and cities throughout the Commonwealth have pledged to ignore and resist these measures. Some Virginia elected officials have called for the National Guard to carry out such confiscation, which would imply the arrest and disarmament of local officials who get in the way. Governor Northam has stopped short of adopting such an idea, but he will NOT rule it out! Additional stories indicate that the government will disable internet and telephone access to affected areas during the crackdown. The prison budget has been increased in anticipation of gun-related arrests.

While the idea of soldiers engaged in gun confiscation is not yet a reality, the proposal itself should alarm every sane person in this country. Elected officials want to send large numbers of uniformed soldiers in combat gear and armored vehicles through residential streets in search of American citizens and their lawful possessions. The hyperbolic political debates of recent years notwithstanding, government oppression has not yet reached the levels displayed by Stalin, Hitler, or Pol Pot. But the Virginia gun confiscation discussion begins to come close. The use of military tanks in residential streets for the purpose of overwhelming law-abiding citizens (and local police) would equal the oppression of Tiananmen Square or the 1968 Prague crackdown.

Democrat regimes have previously been willing to endure political backlash from the temporary use of military force against civilians. Waco and EliΓ‘n GonzΓ‘lez bear witness to this recent history. The proposed Virginia gun confiscation would be far more widespread, with more enduring consequences.

The real issue is how the citizens of Virginia and the rest of the country should respond. It is safe to assume that other state governments are watching to see how far they can go when mere constitutional rights get in their way. Nearby governors might even contribute their own troops to help Governor Northam. A proper response would deter politically minded governors in other states and might even invite the federal government to intervene to protect individual rights before the Virginia crisis escalates. Widespread discussion of this response now might even deter Northam from this military mobilization.

Any such military action would produce shocking imagery, but do NOT expect the story to tell itself. The images and the facts will be heavily censored — the same way that every other worthwhile story is censored by the MSM. What few images do get through will be overwhelmed by endless MSM commentary that blames law-abiding citizens for this military intervention. The MSM will run stock footage from old school shootings for comparison, thus reminding the viewers what the governor claims to be fighting. They might even claim that the confiscations are necessary to fight "global warming."  

If you want the real story to reach America and the world, you must film it and spread the story YOURSELF. Do NOT rely on social media, smartphones, or other internet-based communication — just in case the stories about internet censorship turn out to be true.

Anonymous said...

For an example of the best response, we should look to Prague, 1968. The Soviet crackdown at that time involved tanks rumbling through the streets of many Czechoslovakian cities. The Czech citizen response is a model for at least a short-term response among the people of Virginia now. When the Soviet tanks made their first appearance on August 21, 1968, the head of a Prague film school immediately gathered his students and distributed cameras and film. He told the students that he did not know why there were tanks on the streets and that they might even be witnessing the beginning of World War III. But he instructed them to take as many pictures and movies as they could and see to it that the film got out of the country to the rest of the world.

This use of citizen photography was very effective, as the record it created generated a backlash that softened the crackdown and united the citizens. The best description of these events appears in the 1988 movie The Unbearable Lightness of Being. If you have any desire to understand the events that we may be about to experience, watch this movie. It will help provide a model for action. But do NOT simply watch the movie on Netflix. Get the DVD with the director's commentary. This commentary tells the story of the photographs: how the student photographers, during the chaos, would hand their film to tourists on the sidewalks with the request that the tourists take the completed film back to their home countries for development and distribution. The viewer sees this strategy dramatized by the actors in the movie. The strategy is not clear without the commentary. The strategy worked, as the movie-makers later found these images in countries all over the world. Museums, schools, libraries, and media outlets throughout western Europe and North America ended up with pieces of the story recorded on film. The world saw the horror firsthand as a result of these student photographers. The Unbearable Lightness movie was made possible because of the contraband photographs and footage. Clandestine audiences in Moscow eventually saw Unbearable Lightness (with its contraband footage) in the final years of the Cold War.

Today, we have an advantage that the people of Prague did not have. We have advance warning! We can obtain cameras in advance — cameras not dependent on the internet AND that cannot be disabled remotely by the government-compliant tech giants. We can plan NOW on how to spirit the film and memory cards away. Virginia shares large borders with neighboring states, each with many possible exits. Once safely out of Virginia, the film or memory cards can be e-mailed to your entire mailing list and shared on social media — and reshared repeatedly in the event of tech-giant censorship. 

We can plan our targets for photography NOW, including likely locations for (1) troop movements, (2) arrests, and (3) the checkpoints and long lines that inevitably accompany government crackdowns. We can film local police as they are confronted and overwhelmed by the military. 

Take and distribute MANY pictures!

It takes VOLUME to make the news. 

It takes VOLUME to make HISTORY! 

We can tell this story OUR way instead of depending on the government-compliant media!

Anonymous said...

Retirement Home Worker Claims to Have Helped Kill 11 Trump Supporters


J said...

Anonymous 9:28 AM,

You have sputtered away at me with quite a few insults, as well as underhanded insinuations that are not direct insults, but there is just one that still bothers me. You said you are not sure what my genetic profile looks like. Why would you say that? What did you mean by it? I've never said anything about my genetics here -- other than commenting once that my ancestors on my paternal side were Jews who changed their name to a gentile last name in England before the time of Cromwell.

I am currently in waiting for the results of whole exome testing for myself and my child, offered to me since I have a child who is on the autism spectrum and also has many symptoms of a mitochondrial disease (as do I and some other members of my family).

Are you anti-Semitic, or do you have information about me? The former seems far more likely than the latter. I have hesitated to challenge you on this point because I don't want to give you the means to enhance the troll status you seem quite likely to be seeking and allow you to intimidate commenters who think you could have the capacity to do online spying of them. I think it is far more likely, though, that you were making a reference to the Jewish part of my paternal bloodline.

Clarify please!

J said...

RayB 3:10 PM,

I am reading Romanism and Reformation, and it is a very good read. I have decided to open my heart and mind to this information.

You have to understand that it has been hard for me to take anti-Catholicism seriously, since I grew up occasionally watching Pope John Paul II on TV, and he always seemed so old, weak, sweet and irrelevant to me. Then I learned of the role he played in the fall of Communism and became impressed at what appeared to me to be the immense power of a frail old man to do something amazingly good for the world. When I became more curious about him I learned about the idea of apostolic succession, and it seemed convincing. Then I read a book called Inventing the Individual and was impressed by the contributions of the Catholic church to western civilization and realized I had always under appreciated them. Then I became aware of the history of the Catholic church struggling against Freemasonry (a power struggle is how I now see it.) This was my mindset at the time when I became aware of you posting against the Catholic church in the comments section of this blog. As you probably recall I was hesitating at the time over joining the Catholic church. Ironically, I decided not to join because of the words of Susanna, who told me with (what to me was admirable) directness and integrity not to join unless I could accept everything decreed by the Magisterium, as opposed to being a "cafeteria Catholic".

I tell you this so that you will know that in spite of my butting heads with you over the Catholic church in the past you will know that all of your steadfastness in presenting mostly facts and logical arguments -- and your avoidance of taking disagreements personally -- have not been in vain.

I also want to apologize to you if I was ever snotty to you in the archives of the comments section in the past.

Anonymous said...

J,,,,,8:31 AM

Goodness gracious, paranoid or what?

I have Jewish blood myself, others in my family, and my ex wife more so, and my children.

So, no, I'm not anti-Semitic.

Strangely, some of the most rabid anti-Semitic people I have ever met in my life are Jews! My Jewish ex wife was anti-Semitic. She had a subscription to The Truth at Last newspaper(white supremacist), and had such a distaste for Jews that I was becoming seriously concerned, so I initiated a serious heart to heart conversation with her concerning the degree of hatred she had toward Jews! The conversation we had did tone down her hatred. She stopped speaking about it, but she did continue to read the Truth at Last paper.

So I'm not spying on you, or anyone else. Never will.

The reason for the genetic profile comment was because I have had mental health issues, depression/anxiety, and debilitating insomnia myself, which has become worse with age. My naturopath suggested I get a genetic profile, which would give a clearer picture to understanding my health issues. So I did, and with the aid of that, she was able to suggest supplements, dietary, and lifestyle changes, which I have followed, and it has helped me considerably. It's good to have a genetic profile, and so inexpensive! Some folks are concerned with privacy, but I'm not worried about that. The PTB will have all your info anyway.

Have a pleasant weekend!

Anonymous said...

Note: I see that the person involved has posted as I was composing this, and I am glad to see that evidently no harm was meant. But I will post this anyway because I think it's important that they know the impression they gave (me for one) as well as to clear some things up!
J 8:31 AM,

You (unfortunately once again) are making ill-considered statements about others here...

You said:

"Anonymous 9:28 AM

"You have sputtered away at me with quite a few insults, as well as underhanded insinuations that are not direct insults, but there is just one that still bothers me. You said you are not sure what my genetic profile looks like. Why would you say that? What did you mean by it?"

Thereby you ASSUMED that ALL the posts criticizing you here have been WRITTEN BY ONLY ONE PERSON.


They AREN'T.


You're NOT omniscient, so please don't say such things as if you ARE.

(I, for one, do not appreciate being automatically lumped in with others and castigated just because we all happen to use the 'Anonymous' option.)

That being said, I have a personal estimate about how many such posters there are but I will NOT mention that number because I DON'T know for sure HOW many there are. (Not a zillion.) And, to be fair, it is HARDLY like you're the first here who has confused anonymous posters with other anonymous posters. Or anonymous posters with NON-anonymous posters (like Dorothy Margraf)! So it's an easy trap to fall into if we 'take the easy route' and decide to go along just blithely assuming that we just 'know' who the author is.

However: It's GOOD that you mentioned 9:28 AM's post because it certainly NEEDS further addressing:

"J, at the end of the last thread, asked if anyone wanted to 'debate' her on a topic? She is either intellectually bored at home, or she just enjoys being a trouble maker here? She makes snotty remarks toward others, but stands behind God if someone challenges her or someone else here. To say 'I am shocked at you' for someone mearly posting a link to an article is childish. To take the 5:03 PM post, and completely fail to address the point of the topic, and launch into a defense of Millennials shows that your more concerned with deflection here, than anything else. Im not sure what your genetic profile looks like, or what kind of abuse you have suffered in life that has affected your mind? If you have insurance, and have not yet had a proper evaluation by a Psychiatrist, then I suggest you get one! And I mean that in a good way."

Anonymous said...

First of all, 9:28 AM, J DIDN'T say "DEBATE", she said "DISCUSS"!

You made it sound COMBATIVE when that was NOT the case at ALL!

Should it be that you simply misremembered the word she used, let that be something that you keep in mind as a general principle to live by:

Don't guess, VERIFY.

And as far as:

"Im not sure what your genetic profile looks like, or what kind of abuse you have suffered in life that has affected your mind? If you have insurance, and have not yet had a proper evaluation by a Psychiatrist, then I suggest you get one! And I mean that in a good way."

I do NOT see any evidence that justifies implying that she is seriously mentally ill. (I had presumed, by the way, that the genetic reference meant family history of medical conditions that would indicate a possible predisposition to mental illness.) And you went WAY too far in (actually somewhat MORE than just) implying that whatever (supposed by you) "abuse (she) has suffered in life" HAS resulted in mental illness:

"abuse you have suffered in life that HAS affected your mind" + "(Have) a proper evaluation by a Psychiatrist".

(PRESUMING that you did not deliberately mean to be mean for meaness' sake) rather than using strongly worded statements as 'corrective' (however they may happen to be phrased):

There, INSTEAD, y

There, INSTEAD, it were OUT OF LINE.

And there (it was not by any definition helpful but) INSTEAD, only HARMFUL.

Is that what you wanted?
(I'm, as I say, glad to see that apparently it wasn't!)

Anonymous said...

(I had meant to change "you were" to "it was" after I read their post as I thought that that kinder phrasing would be more apropos and I did it too hastily.)



There, INSTEAD, it was OUT OF LINE.

And there (it was not by any definition helpful but) INSTEAD, only HARMFUL.

Is that what you wanted?
(I'm, as I say, glad to see that apparently it wasn't!)

Anonymous said...

GOP Reps Go Public After Overhearing ‘Active Threats’ from Dems on House Floor

By Jared Harris
Western Journal

At least two Republican lawmakers say they overhead threats levied by Democratic enforcers in the House of Representatives recently, and now they’re going public with the shocking allegations.

During a Monday appearance on the Fox News program “Hannity,” Reps. Matt Gaetz of Florida and Andy Biggs of Arizona recalled hearing Democrats use thuggish tactics to get their fellow party members on board with the impeachment of President Donald Trump.

The threats allegedly turned Democrats’ big money machines into potential weapons against any party member who refused to toe the line.

“It’s not just that Nancy Pelosi raises money for her caucus,” Gaetz told guest host Gregg Jarrett. “It’s that they used that money as a political weapon against anyone who potentially would vote against impeachment.”

“Andy and I observed active threats on the House floor that if the Blue Dog Democrats didn’t go along with the radical left of the Democratic Party and support impeachment, that they would not be supported by the [Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee].”

Biggs confirmed this tactic is a powerful one that has scared many who fear for their careers in Washington, D.C.

Anonymous said...

As a point of interest regarding that Western Journal article: former governor Jesse Ventura has expressed great opposition to the two-party system and calls for political parties to be ABOLISHED!

Anonymous said...

"As a point of interest regarding that Western Journal article: former governor Jesse Ventura has expressed great opposition to the two-party system and calls for political parties to be ABOLISHED!"

Who cares what he says? He was the one who brought many thousands of Somalian Muslims into that great state.

Anonymous said...

It's vitally important that one learns to dispassionately separate fallible
NON-perfect human beings from good things that they may promote.

And now for another episode of...

Jesse Ventura

JV: And so you see, kids, that 1+1= 2!

Afterwards, on their way home...

Student #1 to Student #2 - "Well, that was interesting!"

Student #2 - "Who cares WHAT he says? My dad said that he was the one who brought many thousands of Somalian Muslims into our state!"

Anonymous said...

Constance & Company...

WATCH: Vatican Christmas concert features indigenous woman teaching audience to CHANNEL ‘MOTHER EARTH!!!'

By Diane Montagna
LifeSite News

ROME - Devotion to “Mother Earth” took center stage at the Vatican Christmas concert this year. 

During the Dec. 14 event, whose lineup included Lionel Richie, Bonnie Tyler and Susan Boyle, a priest took to the stage with an indigenous young woman, a translator and the evening’s host, Italian television personality, Federica Panicucci. Watch the event here:


He asked: “What is your relationship with Mother Earth?” to which she responded by inviting the audience to cross their arms over their heart and “feel a strong vibration.” The audience, which included senior Vatican officials such as Cardinal Giuseppe Versaldi, Prefect of the Congregation for Catholic Education, and deputy Secretary of State, or sostituto, Archbishop Edgar Pena Parra, all complied. 

“This is the heart – your heart, but also the heart of Mother Earth,” the young indigenous woman continued. “In another place, where you feel silence, there is the spirit, the spirit that allows us to understand the message of the Mother.”

She went on to explain: “For us, the indigenous peoples, above all for my people, Mother Earth, the ‘Hicha Guaia,’ is everything. It is this Mother who provides us with nourishment. She is the one who gives us the sacred water, she is the one who gives us the medicinal plants, and she is the one who reminds us of our origin, the origin of [our] creation. Therefore, we give to her our birth placenta and our first cutting of hair. Our connection with her is constant. That’s how the pulse feels, that’s how the heart feels, it vibrates.”

The priest told the audience that the young lady’s remarks reminded him of the Old Testament...


RayB said...


Regarding your 9:16 AM post ...

Thanks for offering an "apology" for any past comments, but honestly, there's nothing to apologize for. Everyone, including myself, might say things in the heat of the debate that they wish they could take back. Having said that, I don't recall you ever saying anything that was directed at me that was out of the ordinary.

I did find your post very interesting ... will have more to say on that a little later.

Anonymous said...

'Operation 2020': Full-Scale Information Warfare Launched Upon Americans As United Nations Preps Free Speech Crackdown & Globalists Pull Out All Stops In Attempt To Take Back America 

Socialism Is A 'Hate Crime' Against Humanity That Must Be Forever Vanquished  

By Stefan Stanford
All News Pipeline
Live Free Or Die

With reports that the United Nations is moving towards handing control of the internet over to dictatorial regimes such as China, thus 'legitimizing' the censorship of free speech and ensuring internet blackouts whenever the 'globalist overlords' see fit as Paul Joseph Watson reported in this recent story over at Summit News, we get a small taste of what America and the world may face in 2020 with globalist-tied US intelligence agencies and the 'weaponized' mainstream media sure to launch 'all out information warfare' upon America and the world in 2020 as we hear from videographer 'Spiro' in the 1st video at the bottom of this story.  

As 'Spiro' warns us in his video, America CANNOT remain a 'free nation' while allowing US 'intelligence agencies' and the 'deep state' to remain 'above the law' and take control over this nation by what we've been witnessing over the past 3 years via: the Russian collusion hoax, the attempted impeachment coup and Democrats in Congress who clearly also see themselves as 'above the law' pushing it all.  

Yet with many Democrat voters still believing every lie spouted by CNN, MSNBC and the mainstream media and many more lies to come as Susan Duclos reported in this ANP story, for a Democrat to win the election in 2020, not only will they have to regain control of the masses by somehow 'reinstalling' the MSM as the main source of factual information, but they'll also have to completely shut down the independent media, something that won't be possible without all-out censorship in 2020. 

And right on time as 2020 arrives, in a move many Democrats who want truth forever vanquished will likely applaud, as Ethan Huff reports in this January 1st story at Natural News, with Russia’s help, communist China has convinced the United Nations to pass a new resolution that threatens to further restrict online free speech in the name of fighting “cybercrime.”

With tyrannical governments throughout history using 'security' as an excuse to clamp down upon 'individual liberty', Huff's story warns that still-free societies such as the US could be transformed into 'communist utopias' with the full implementation of this resolution.


Anonymous said...

I wonder if the intense push by the globalist against free speech, and the lawless coup attempt here in the U.S. isn't the opening of the 'first seal' in action? They are 'conquering' nationalism, and the constitutional documents that are their foundations, and replacing everything with their totalitarian New World Order. They are right now, forcing the 'beast system' globaly. If so, then it's very possible we are now somewhere within the final 7 years.

Anonymous said...

Anyway, the Globalist have taken the gloves off, and if indeed we have entered the last 7 year period, we will see increasing violence toward anyone resistant to the antichrist's New World Order.

I live in a very small town in Vermont, and for the last few months I always see the local police wearing the bulky military upper body armor! I have wanted to ask them why, but I'm apprehensive.

Anonymous said...


The intensive militarization of 
America's police forces is a serious menace about which a small number of people have been loudly warning for years, with little attention or traction.


11 Shocking Facts About America's Militarized Police 

The militarization of police is harming civil liberties, impacting children, and transforming neighborhoods into war zones.


Police Militarization Is OUT OF CONTROL, and There's NO Oversight

By Kara Dansky, a senior counsel at the ACLU's Center for Justice, is the author of "War Comes Home: The Excessive Militarization of American Policing," an ACLU report.

Police departments across the country have unquestionably become excessively militarized. Our year-long investigation found that not only has policing become excessively militarized, but this militarization has occurred with almost no oversight. Further, of the more than 800 paramilitary raids that we studied, almost 80 percent were for ordinary law enforcement purposes like serving search warrants on people’s homes. Only SEVEN PERCENT were for genuine emergencies, such as a barricade or hostage situation.


The Militarization Of The Police:

Changing over from...

'To Serve And Protect'


'To Terrify And Occupy'
Initially, [SWAT teams were] an elite force reserved for uniquely dangerous incidents, such as active shooters, hostage situations, or large-scale disturbances.

Nearly a half-century later, that’s no longer true.

In 1984, according to Radley Balko’s Rise of the Warrior Cop, about 26% of towns with populations between 25,000 and 50,000 had SWAT teams. By 2005, that number had soared to 80% and it’s still rising, though SWAT statistics are notoriously hard to come by.

As the number of SWAT teams has grown nationwide, so have the raids. Every year now, there are approximately 50,000 SWAT raids in the United States, according to Professor Pete Kraska of Eastern Kentucky University’s School of Justice Studies. In other words, roughly 137 times a day a SWAT team assaults a home and plunges its inhabitants and the surrounding community into terror.

In a recently released report, “War Comes Home,” the American Civil Liberties Union (my employer) discovered that nearly 80% of all SWAT raids it reviewed between 2011 and 2012 were deployed to execute a search warrant.

Pause here a moment and consider that these violent home invasions are routinely used against people who are only SUSPECTED of a crime. Up-armored paramilitary teams now regularly bash down doors in search of evidence of a possible crime. In other words, police departments increasingly choose a tactic that often results in injury and property damage as its first option, NOT the one of last resort. In more than 60% of the raids the ACLU investigated, SWAT members rammed down doors in search of possible drugs, NOT to save a hostage, respond to a barricade situation, or neutralize an active shooter.

Exposing the Globalists and their World Order

The Psychotic Militarization of Law Enforcement


American Police WILL Enforce the New World Order


Anonymous said...

Got memory loss, brain fog and chronic fatigue? Here are the top 5 causes!

January 04, 2020
By: S.D. Wells
Natural News

It’s really hard to eat healthy when you read the wrong news or can’t even remember good advice when you hear it. Some people get really motivated when they see a Youtuber who’s in great shape and has simple tips, but try to put those strategies into action while your cleansing organs are being ‘vandalized’ by chemicals, and without the right nutrients in your system, and you can forget about it.

It’s actually sad...to watch millions of Americans try to “get healthy” (mentally and physically) by eating a salad from a fast food restaurant or from the prepared food bar at some corporate superstore. (Just because somebody told you to eat more vegetables DOESN'T mean they meant chomping down some genetically modified, pesticide-laden crop with GM soybean or canola oil dressing all over it!)

It’s no accident that 90 percent of the food and medicine in America is purposely “engineered” to cause memory loss, brain fog and lethargy.

Just as any Democrat politician will tell you straight up, they want a bigger “working class” to pay those taxes and work on those assembly lines. It’s called “slaves to the grind,” and if they were to get smart, energetic, creative and start remembering how they got screwed over just weeks or months ago, well, then they might “get ahead” and escape the sick care system.

How often do you hear people brag about their medical coverage at work, or their 401K, or their health savings account, only to find out it fails them when they need it most?

Remember Detroit anyone?

Most healthcare in America means bad advice, chemical medicine, unnecessary surgery and bankruptcy (including loss of social security and pensions).

Does it really matter what PPO or HMO plan you’re on if you’re dying from cancer, diabetes, heart disease and dementia?

It’s all a trick.

It’s a double-edged sword and you’re being stabbed in the heart by toxic food and chemical medicine that keeps you from thinking straight or even doing anything about it if you do.

Here are the top 5 ways most Americans lose their memory, short and long term, and fail to realize the answer to their mental and physical well-being, even when it’s right in front of their eyes, or when it’s right there in their hands:

Top 5 causes of memory loss, brain fog and chronic fatigue (lethargy)

#1. Pesticides in foods and beverages, including all things GMO

#2. Canola oil

#3. Flu shot

#4. Tap water

#5. Lack of organic food and spring water

Anonymous said...

Pesticides are designed to kill bugs and weeds. Pesticide is the umbrella name for insecticides, herbicides, fungicides and toxic fertilizers. Some pesticides destroy insect’s digestive tracts. Others keep beetles and worms from reproducing. Some pesticides, called neonicotinoids, cause pollinator insects (bees) to forget where their hives are. Similar pesticides in food, including genetically modified soy and corn, cause memory loss and confusion in humans.

Even fluoride in tap water, most ice cubes, and most juices sold at grocery stores causes memory loss and lowered IQ. This has been SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN in research at Harvard University.

This same fluoridated water is sprayed on nearly all conventional crops, so when you eat non-organic food, you’re eating bug killer and weed killer (think glyphosate) that erases your memory plus causes brain fog, depression, anxiety and dementia.

Canola oil is rapeseed oil that’s been diluted of its poison so the FDA can call it GRAS, or generally recognized as safe. That means IT'S STILL DEADLY, it just takes longer to kill you, and in ways you can’t prove for lawsuit compensation.

Yes, rapeseed oil is a KNOWN insecticide!
(Leave canola oil outside in a bowl and not even the ants or cockroaches will eat it!)

Most flu shots, a.k.a. the “influenza vaccine,” contain 25,000 times the mercury that the EPA warns you about in fish! It’s labeled as thimerosal (50 percent mercury) and causes neurological disorders and brain damage. THE MOST DANGEROUS non-radioactive element on Earth, mercury accumulates in the brain and does chronic damage throughout one’s lifetime.

Mainstream Medicine and the AMA want you dumb, forgetful and dying of cancer slowly while they strip your assets to nothing

Mainstream medicine conducts fake research to discredit the power of organic food and spring water (or well-filtered water). No medical doctor or oncologist can legally ever blame conventional food, tap water or vaccines for memory loss and dementia. The American Medical Association (AMA) would shut them down and take away their medical license immediately. That’s because organic food, including superfoods, help you think critically, heal naturally, have energy and experience longevity. This goes against everything the chronic care system of America represents.

Don’t let conventional food that’s polluted with pesticides take away your body, brain, money and life. Shop smart. Buy organic and trusted local. Now tune your internet dial to...


...to find out if your own inflammation, hypertension, brain fog, undue stress or memory loss is due to all those confounded bug and weed killers sprayed incessantly onto US crops and produce.

Watch and learn how you don’t need meat, dairy or conventional food to be lean, happy and in complete control of your health. Here’s Hench Herbivore breaking it down to the basement of basics:


NO excuses now!


Anonymous said...

Is Drag Queen Story Hour coming to Sunday services?


Anonymous said...

Guess what the leading cause of death was in 2019?



Anonymous said...

Openly GAY priest claims Pope Francis AFFIRMED his HOMOSEXUALITY in private phone call


Anonymous said...

Vatican's global pact for 'new humanism' PROMOTES ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT


«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 423   Newer› Newest»