Saturday, May 13, 2017

World Wide Cyber attacks reported tonight -- be careful on your own system

There are extensive media reports tonight about a major worldwide cyber attack.  The culprits have not yet been found, nor the source identified to the best of my present knowledge.

I've been relatively offline the past two weeks, my main computer having once again suffered a major crash a week ago this past Monday.  It was nearly 3 am, I had nearly finished an important Motion and Brief in Support for a client.  I had reached the point where I knew it was time to go grab whatever sleep I could get if I was ever able ever to be functional again.  There was not, in my then estimation, time to do more than to put the computer to sleep and resume in the morning.  BIG MISTAKE.  I wish I had at least emailed the material to myself -- that would have preserved it.   The computer was also in the midst of an indexing operation.   It may have also been time for one of those MicroSoft 10 early in the morning updates.  I tried to resume from the computer sleep but could not.  The computer hung for a half hour and then I received THE DREADED BLUE SCREEN OF DEATH -- a systems error.

My trusty computer technician was unavailable -- most of my friends like to consider me their personal computer "geek" anyway.  I tried every option I could think of and was starting to think I wish I had trusted the cloud more -- I am still leery of dependence on the "clouds" -- MicroSoft's, Google's, Amazon's and everybody else's.

I relied on multiple hard drive backups -- and those I have, but I still lost some material including pet vaccination records, etc.

Most of my client data files had multiple backups elsewhere and were safe -- the brief I had worked on so hard that night was not.  Mea culpa!  My old research files and digitized information  were multiply backed up and are safe.

The worst frustration is having to reinstall software and go through the Adobe Acrobat Professional processes again.
At any rate, that is why you didn't see too much of me on-line -- I'm still recovering from the disaster.  My computer was running Windows 10 but as it is now a fine computer from a mechanical perspective, it had to be reformatted to its original Windows 8.  Windows 8 had to go through approximately 180 upgrades to go to the necessary Windows 8.1 to receive Windows 10.

I suspect it was the Windows auto upgrade process that caused the system corruption -- that combined with my putting it to sleep.  I wish I had first halted all operations and then shut it down for the night.  I just do not know.

Fortunately, I found a computer with close (slightly less ram) to the same specifications that came with Windows 10 as its starting point.  I've installed it as my backup system and the downed computer is now rerunning with Windows 10 -- which add injury to the insult, now required a $119 plus purchase of the operating system.  The MicroSoft people were gracious enough and kept promising to help me with that problem, but somehow their calls they placed to me mysteriously went to busy signals.  Finally, if I seriously wanted to be up and running enough, I purchased a copy of the operating system from the local Best Buy.

Well, the computers are great when they work.  I am still going through the painful processes.  I've had a habit of maintaining what I call a "desktop backtop" of scanned information.  I will be busy for quite some time retrieving and OCR'ing those files.

Pray for me and my computer system.  So much was happening that was so very relevant in the past two weeks -- I was able to talk a great deal about it on my Saturday morning radio program on network.  I will be doing so upon arising later this morning.

I had enough backed up that it wasn't a total disaster, but not so much as should have been saved to prevent personal and family inconvenience.  Benefit from my mistakes and thanks for sticking with me.  A few of you have phoned -- I was happy to hear from you!

Stay tuned!



Anonymous said...

Get a Mac

Constance Cumbey said...

I've got a Mac -- they've got their issues, too!


Constance Cumbey said...

Back to some of my old Javier Solana material and his relationship to Salvador de Madariaga - reported when I first discovered him by the press as Solana's grandfather and after we reported on Madariaga's theosophy, he suddenly became a "Great Uncle" BECAUSE their GRANDFATHER's were COUSINS. That would make him, if that were true, a very distant cousin, indeed -- not a Great Nephew.

At any rate, I found the following in Anne Morrow Lindbergh's book, THE FLOWER AND THE NETTLE, pages 563 and 564 about Grandfather/Great Uncle, whatever's aspirations for Europe and what it would take -- A UNIFYING LEADER:

Home to lunch with Madariaga. He is very brilliant and interesting.
A quick birdlike little man with his head cocked on one
side and his humorous twinkling eyes. He makes some remarkable
statements, including one that universal suffrage is not necessarily
an adjunct to democracy. He says that Hitler is the evil
genius of Europe-the desire for unity through brute force, the
conqueror. But this devil cannot be exorcised except by the complementary
god-the good genius, unity through peaceful means,
peaceful organization. But as yet there is no god, no leader. Of
the chances for war now: "Who knows-it is all in the mind of one man, and (with a gesture and twinkle) I sometimes even
doubt whether it is in his mind or whether it is not somewhere
else-in his solar plexus."
He is not pessimistic about the ultimate
future of Europe, only about the near future.
It is intensely stimulating to hear C. and him talking together.
He notices our pictures and likes them. He is on some committee
to make sure that the painters are using good colors and
canvas, as many paintings are going to pieces. They talk also of
the poor ink people use, even for documents. In Washington (C.
says) an official used "washable ink."
"Ah," said Madariaga, "that would be the ink for Mr. Hitler!"


Very, very interesting!


Anonymous said...

Globalist Trump to Confirm Covenant with Many!

Constance Cumbey said...

To Anonymous 7:25

I'm watching the video link you gave with no small amount of concern. Thank you!


Thomas Dahlheimer said...

New Age pan[en]theists believe that God is the manifested, transcendental Being beyond creation, but existing in relation to creation. Becoming One with the infinite Spirit (the unmanifested Absolute) who exists whether the universe does or does not exist, is
the highest state of Consciousness, and the ultimate goal. Spirit created the God who created the universe. A human being must first become one with the divine Christ Consciousness present in all creation before he/she can become one with the infinite Spirit. We have to go through "Jesus Christ" in creation to get to the "Father" (Spirit). While this universe still exists,
we should want to be, both, one with the divine Christ Consciousness present in all creation
and one with the infinite Spirit.

Craig said...

Spirit created the God who created the universe.

This is one of the things that makes your dogma untenable. Your "unmanifested Absolute" either somehow made a copy of Himself (or a copy of Himself was made) or another emanation of this "Absolute" made a copy of Him/Her/Itself, culminating in the "God" who made this inferior universe. This means that a copy of the "Absolute" is inferior to the original. Can't the "Absolute" copy any better than that? Amoebas seem to do a better job at replicating.

Now, if your claim is different than this, such that the "Spirit" (Wisdom Sophia?) created this inferior God who made this inferior universe, I have to wonder why your "Absolute" cannot do a better job of policing His ranks.

Anonymous said...

Great comeback, Craig.
The only absolute of Mr. Dahlheimer is that he has talked himself into a meaningless round and round of unreasoned, disconnected, nonsense.

Anonymous said...

You're most welcome, Constance.

Anonymous said...

Craig, I see Thomas Dahlheimer hasn't bothered responding to your earlier refutations of his illogical ramblings, such as his nonsense expounding (Darwinian?) evolution.

I doubt you'll get any sustainable nor sustained logical responses this time either. It seems he likes to come here to piddle in confusion but doesn't like to clean up his mess, preferring a quick escape, when it's pointed out to him.

His 'god' is the 'god' of this world, the prince of the air, whether he knows it or not. He needs to repent and quickly for time is short!

Rich Peterson - Medford said...

Dahlheimer's posts echo exactly what I've read in the Sophia teachings. Apparently, Sophia, in her zeal to create, did so independently of her male counterpart the divine masculine. In doing so she introduced an err in the cosmos which caused the two to separate. I remember as I read this nonsense I wrote in the margin that perhaps she hadn't payed enough attention in math class.

Craig said...

Rich Peterson,

Since Mr. Dahlheimer only provides snippets (and doesn't engage with responses to his comments), it's difficult to tell exactly what he believes. As regards Sophia, apparently there are a number of different versions of her "fall" (see Benjamin Walker's Gnosticism: Its History and Influence); but, Dahlheimer's is consistent with the notion that she created the Demiurge, aka Jehovah, the 'evil' creator, resulting in all matter being evil, while the spirit remains good.

Anonymous said...

Jim Bakker:  'Spirit of the Antichrist' Inside Those Who Mock Trump

May 15, 2017

The "spirit of the Antichrist" is living inside people who mock President Donald Trump, televangelist Jim Bakker said.
Speaking on "The Jim Bakker Show," he discussed recent widening social divisions in American society, which he linked to the First Horseman of the Apocalypse.
"It seems like there is a hatred among peoples and this is satanic," he said. "This is the White Horse of the Apocalypse. The White Horse of the Apocalypse is the first horse. It's a horse of speech. It's a horse of spirit. And the spirit of Antichrist is out now. This is what you're seeing. You want to know what the Antichrist spirit looks like? That's what's going on in America. These people mocking the president. The words they use. The speech they use. That's the spirit of Antichrist. That's the spirit of hatred."
Bakker had a popular TV ministry in the 1980s, but resigned in shame following a sex scandal.
He also served five years in prison for fraud.
Right Wing Watch has been documenting what it considers extreme comments, including on Bakker's show.
Earlier this month, for example, Bakker dismissed the large Tax Day protests nationwide against Trump.
"What's going on in America where, you know, all these people gather all at the same time in the same place? How can they all gather together? Every city they're marching, they're all doing this, who is setting this up? The reporters all believe it. They're feeding us a lie!"
Bakker turned for guidance to one of his guests on the show, "End Times" author Joel Richardson, who said that Satan was involved in the protests:
"It's not against Donald Trump. On the outside, in the natural [world], it's, 'We hate Donald Trump,' 'We're furious about this and we're furious about that,' but the Scriptures say they gather and they plot ultimately against the Lord and against His anointed."          

Anonymous said...

Say what you want about Jim Bakker... but, if it had not been for his cable television show back in 1982, I would never have heard of Constance Cumbey or her book, "The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow." After hearing her speak on his show... I decided to go to a Christian book store the next day and buy her book. Learning about the New Age Movement changed my entire perspective of the world.

Anonymous said...

Fair enough Anon 2:52 PM, however, that doesn't in any way shape or form take away from the validity of Anon 2:33 PM's post. Yet only highlights how far removed from reason, he no doubt once held, Bakker has now become.

Anonymous said...

To Anonymous @ 5:40 PM

I was the one who posted at 2:52 PM... and I am also in complete agreement with Anonymous who posted at 2:33 PM.

I probably need to clarify. The only point I was trying to make is that some people may still have 'a bad taste in their mouths' remembering the PTL Jim & Tammy Bakker scandal of the 1980s. I believe that any one of us can change and seek and receive forgiveness for our sins and learn valuable life lessons from our mistakes. I believe that today, Jim Bakker has shown that he is truly a man of God in the purest sense of the word.

Craig said...

Let me offer my two cents on the Jim Bakker comment @ 2:33 PM. I’m not so sure I’d link the current goings-on with the “White Horse of the Apocalypse”. More concerning is Bakker’s language about “the Lord’s anointed”—in fact that entire last paragraph. It all sounds like Dominionism to me.

Yes, I think Satan is involved in these protests, but perhaps not in the way Richardson sees it.

Having said that, I agree that it seems clear that the demonstrations are orchestrated (especially the so-called “Antifa”), and I think it’s because Trump is not playing to the globalists. I also believe the media is and has been fabricating truth for quite some time. Let’s call it “selective truth telling”.

Craig said...

One example of “selective truth telling” relates to guns. On YouTube there are a number of videos showing ‘Good Samaritans’, with their concealed-carry status, helping the police (or other citizens). One notable incident involved a prolonged high speed chase (over 100 mph) on a Florida highway, with the car finally pulling over after many near misses with other vehicles. The man in the speeding car immediately jumped out of his vehicle and attacked the officer, knocking him to the ground and straddling him. He was a big man, a black man, a former corrections officer. The officer was white.

From one of the stopped vehicles—this all occurred on a 3 or 4 lane freeway—emerged an armed black man (with an amazing amount of calmness), with a concealed-carry permit. After repeatedly asking the man on top of the officer to get off him, with the man refusing while attempting to grab the officer’s gun, the man with the gun permit shot him four times. During this time, the officer told the ‘Good Samaritan’ to shoot him, because he’d been frantically maneuvering to keep the perpetrator from getting his weapon.

This made the local news, but not the national. Why? Well, it doesn’t fit the typical narrative in two ways: (1) it wasn’t a ‘white on black’ shooting (or even a ‘police’ shooting); (2) it didn’t work well with the push for gun control.

Anonymous said...

President Trump needs our prayers...

Deep State / Mainstream Media Pushes Coup D’état Against Trump

Elites want him impeached

Anonymous said...

The American people need to wake up to the fact that The Globalists have been determined to get Trump out of office since Day #1, because he is trying to drain the swamp... and THEY are the swamp!!! Also, he needs to get rid of any 'sharks' within his inner circle.

Anonymous said...

Antichrist Trump

Come, let us reason together.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 1:56 PM

What detailed evidence do you have (based on biblical scripture) that Trump is the antichrist? You need to be specific, or you could be accused of slandering this man without reason.

(So far, none of these youtube videos have convinced me. They are pure speculation.)

Anonymous said...

9:23 AM, I put it to you that have not watched the videos nor looked properly at the video in the link posted here at 1:56 PM, for had you properly done so, you wouldn't be writing your post at 9:23 AM. The evidence is ample and is found in the video(s) and verifiable references made therein.

I suggest others watch this video, and Brother James Key's other videos, and check out the references given therein, so they can see my claims for themselves whether it is I who am disingenuous or you.

Slander and speculation do not exist where ample evidence is offered as is in Brother James Key's videos.

Have a good day.

Anonymous said...

9:23 AM, I put it to you that you have not watched the videos nor looked properly at the video in the link posted here at 1:56 PM, for had you properly done so, you wouldn't be writing your post at 9:23 AM. The evidence is ample and is found in the video(s) and verifiable references made therein.

I suggest others watch this video, and Brother James Key's other videos, and check out the references given therein, so they can see my claims for themselves whether it is I who am disingenuous or you.

Slander and speculation do not exist where ample evidence is offered as is in Brother James Key's videos.

Have a good day.

Dan Bryan said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...1:56 PM
Antichrist Trump

I can see how his conjecture could work with the Trump.
If Trump is so intent on 'making the deal' it could be the wrong deal.

Here is a different perspective on Trump worth looking at as well.

If the Christian community comply with 2 Chronicles 7:13,14 during this time of confusion all will go well with our country otherwise I believe Trump could become the tool of the enemy. The Church has a choice... What will it choose?

Anonymous said...

Trump is already the willing tool of the enemy, Dan Brian, as the unassailable evidence in the videos of Brother James Key's youtube channel and blogs show.

Constance Cumbey said...

Had an exceptionally busy but underpaid week as a lawyer this week -- just going on air for radio program -- join me there at, push button "listen live" and/or join the chatroom. Call in live to 208-935-0094.


Anonymous said...

Another perspective to consider...

President Trump exposes the Satanic Illuminati New World Order (2016)

Anonymous said...

Christian Leader Sees 'Spiritual Battle' Over Trump Presidency

Craig said...

I like what Dick Morris has to say on the Trump firing of Comey. And I like what he says about the Clinton Foundation:

Why Trump Really Fired Comey | Dick Morris

Christine Erikson (aka Justina) said... Summer of Rage | Mass Riots in July?

paul, I apologize for putting the wrong name on.

re Jim Bakker, anyone who could tolerate him before the scandal and sees only the scandal is seriously fleshly and loving deception. the whole style was to put it mildly worldly and fleshly I doubt it has changed much. I couldn't stomach him for more than a few seconds, two minutes at the most. the scandal was predictable. and THEME PARK!? and his wife like an over made up whore? that people would send him money shows how screwed up many Christians are.

Craig "Yet rather than concede that your assertion is wrong in view of the evidence I provided,"

you gave no evidence

"you go back to your original assertion that the syntax is not ambiguous"

EXCUSE ME?! I NEVER SAID THE SYNTAX WAS NOT AMBIGUOUS. I said that the ambiguity was more typical of Revelation than the rest of the NT and some said therefore John didn't write it, but less educated and alone this could be expected. Scripture ambiguities - difficulty of finite expressing inifnite, also it is street Greek not Classical Greek, think ebonics vs. Ivy League English.

" and claim I'd made your point (I didn't)."

Yes you made my point, because when you quote Greek that says THE ONE in that sentence instead of repeating the word LAMB it is clearly speaking about THE LAMB because books don't get slain and if all in it die then no one meets Jesus at His Return and gets caught up as He is descending. the translator who put the repeat of "Lamb" in the sentence obviously saw "the one" as referring to The Lamb.

saying the LAMB was slain from the foundation of the cosmos is consistent with your true statement, that God "had a plan from the very beginning." The Lamb was as good as dead because His death (and REsurrection) was determined from before Creation to correct what
would inevitably happen.

I'm not going to argue with you anymore on this. you want to pursue your self righteousness
go ahead. meanwhile, paul, forget health reasons for food laws. there aren't any. it was about separation. That is explicitly clear.

"MCE is not interested in the truth, not interested in what is right." on the contrary, defending truth is why I argue and I am repeatedly apalled by what I see here. Like the people who insisted that the parable of the mustard tree was not about what Jesus said it was about, the growth of the Kingdom of Heaven, but about the abnormal growth of false churches.

Craig said...

Christine, continuing to obfuscate:

Craig [wrote to Christine:] "Yet rather than concede that your assertion is wrong in view of the evidence I provided,"

[her response:] you gave no evidence

The evidence was in the Greek text I provided, which refutes your assertion that (1) it is not ambiguous; (2) that “the Lamb” is in the 2nd half of the verse rather than “book of life” which is in the first [since The LAmb is mentioned second half of sentence but not the book of life, the seconed half is about the Lamb not the book… (10:53PM – all time stamps from previous thread)]; and, (3) that “the Lamb” was not repeated in the verse. I’ll provide proof of your statements as I go.

[quoting me:] "you go back to your original assertion that the syntax is not ambiguous"

EXCUSE ME?! I NEVER SAID THE SYNTAX WAS NOT AMBIGUOUS. I said that the ambiguity was more typical of Revelation than the rest of the NT and some said therefore John didn't write it, but less educated and alone this could be expected. Scripture ambiguities - difficulty of finite expressing inifnite, also it is street Greek not Classical Greek, think ebonics vs. Ivy League English.

Addressing (1), your initial response (1:14AM) stated: not grammar ambiguity, but that the atoning death of the Lamb was decided on before creation… You partially backed down from this assertion [re syntax ambiguity Revelation was questioned because of poor writing style (1:18AM)], claiming that, comparatively, John’s Gospel is not ambiguous because John had help [a semi literate fisherman would have scribes help him phrase the Gospel, but was on his own on Patmos (1:18AM)]; however, the Scriptural evidence shows ambiguity throughout the NT, including John’s Gospel. In fact, the current series I’m writing points to this in John 19:28-30.


Craig said...


Yet, then again, your words below imply that it’s not really ambiguous (‘round and ‘round we go), because (2) and (3) above:

[quoting me:] "and claim I'd made your point (I didn't)."

Yes you made my point, because when you quote Greek that says THE ONE in that sentence instead of repeating the word LAMB it is clearly speaking about THE LAMB because books don't get slain… the translator who put the repeat of "Lamb" in the sentence obviously saw "the one" as referring to The Lamb.

So, after your initial claim (2), you respond to my preemptive response to you—“the Lamb” is not repeated (3)—by claiming that the Greek substantival [τοῦ ἐσφαγμένου], which means “the one slain”, or “who was slain” (or, “the one who was slain”) is a repeating of “the Lamb”, though you neglect that even if one were to grant that (I wouldn’t), that it’s STILL IN THE LATTER PART OF THE VERSE ALONG WITH “BOOK OF LIFE” (2).

I’m only belaboring this because I’m tired of you running roughshod over folks here. My initial comment was in response to Dahlheimer, but you had to butt in with your ‘know-it-all’ attitude. You clearly DON’T know it all.

paul said...

No health reasons???
So it's just a coincidence that pork can occasionally carry deadly trichanomus, and shellfish can occasionally carry red tide poison?
And it's just a coincidence that God said that animals with a cloven hoof AND who chew the cud are "CLEAN", as opposed to UNCLEAN? So the words clean and unclean don't really mean anything ?
Okey thanks Christine. I didn't realize that God was saying something that He didn't really mean all through the Mosaic Law.
Luckily we have you to straighten these things out...
I didn't realize that the Mosaic laws on food were just exercises in obedience for no practical reason.

Craig said...

Phooey. In my attempt to unravel Christine’s Gordian knot, I added an extra “not” in my point (3) above. That is, it should be: (3) that “the Lamb” was repeated in the verse. And since I’m providing a correction, I’ll add another preemptive statement. If I were to state, “Christine, the one who would argue with wallpaper”, the part after “Christine” is descriptive, NOT a repeating of “Christine”. Hence “the Lamb” is not repeated in the Greek text.

I don’t like continuing to be the voice of opposition, however I don’t think Brother James Key has made his case, and, agreeing with 9:23AM, I find the videos too speculative. Of course, ‘pin the tail on the Antichrist’ attempts are, by nature, speculative. Yet, anything can happen, but for now, I don’t see this.

I’m not so sure Christian’s can appeal to 2 Chronicles 7:13-14, as this was specifically for the Nation Israel, under theocratic rule. The body of Christ is not a theocracy, and America is not a theocratic nation. Of course, we are to pray for our leaders, but that’s a separate thing altogether. I think the following article does a good job of explaining the meaning and implications of this text:

2 Chronicles 7:14 Isn’t About American Politics.

On another note, I’m surprised no one is mentioning the current news regarding Seth Rich. Was he the DNC leaker to Wikileaks? Does this explain his murder?

Susanna said...


Since no one took Seth Rich's wallet watch or phone, it has been suggested that robbery was not to motive for his murder. According to Gateway Pundit, Rich, who had come to DC to pursue a career in politics, was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton family.

Fairly recently, someone named "Kim Dotcom" just admitted he worked with Seth Rich to get info to WikiLeaks.

Kim Dotcom, born Kim Schmitz, is a wanted man by the FBI, the Justice Department, and especially Hollywood. For the last decade or so, Dotcom has spent millions fighting extradition to the United States for copyright infringement laws involving Mega Upload, the file-sharing site he founded.

Accused of creating a medium where independent users of his site could upload, share and distribute files such as Hollywood movies, Dotcom cannot leave the country where he currently lives, New Zealand. That is, unless he wants to spend the rest of his life behind bars.

So why would a wanted man, larger than life as the notorious B.I.G, want to wade into the world of geopolitics? Maybe the answer can be found in the person of Seth Rich.

Rich, who was working for the Democratic National Committee (DNC), was killed assassination style just feet from his Washington, DC home. Despite authorities calling it a robbery, none of his valuables were taken, leaving many to question whether his death, which is still unsolved, was politically motivated.

Within days of his murder, Wikileaks released a treasure trove of emails belonging to the DNC. Those emails created a firestorm of controversy for the mainstream media, the DNC, Hillary Clinton, and Bernie Sanders’ supporters.

The database revealed Sanders to be the fall-guy for the eventual nomination of Clinton, with DNC staffers collaborating with members of the mainstream media to make Sanders look bad in the news. Those emails also showed CNN’s political analyst Donna Brazile had passed debate questions on to Hillary Clinton’s campaign ahead of one of her debates with Donald Trump, clearly giving Clinton the advantage.

Immediately after being exposed, the Russian narrative was hatched, blaming America’s enemy number one for the DNC database hacking. But when Rich turned up dead on his proverbial front door step, whispers circulated the DNC staffer was the source for the Wikileaks dump, not the Russians. Seth was murdered on July 10, in the 2100 block of Flagler Place NW, in D.C., but his killer(s) is still at-large and the investigation into his death has stalled.

See also....

Kim Dotcom Goes All In: 'I Knew Seth Rich... I Was Involved'
May 20, 2017

Christine Erikson (aka Justina) said...

Craig, I didn't back down AT ALL from ANYTHING. if you can't see that in English, I doubt
you can make any valid points in Greek so I doubt I will waste my time reading whatever

nonsense you put together in that article. This is the second time you ascribed to me
things I was not doing and didn't appear to be either, admitting you take things the way you
prefer so you are not after truth but subjective wishful thinking.

The original English translation said The Lamb twice, second time translating "the one"
so I'm not alone in figuring this meant the Lamb. meanwhile you are left in the position
of saying either

no one is left alive who were in the book of life, unlikely given harpazo statement and
Matthew 24 though not impossible given Luke 18:8,

the other an absurdity, that a book is killed,

third option a reference to God's preplanning which is to the glory of God. And you refuse
the latter. hah!

or the absurdity that only those who get killed are in the Lamb's book of life, that if you didn't
die a martyr violently, but died peacefully in your sleep, you are damned or at least real low

class barely tolerated on the perimeter of the Kingdom of HEaven when it is installed on earth.

paul, you don't understand the concept of "clean" in ritual context. in all your Bible "study"
you didn't notice that the "clean" to eat of quadrupeds were the "clean" to sacrifice?
or that many many others were off the menu? seal, the staple of eskimo was prohibited.

horsemeat therefore horse milk prohibited. whale, eels, octopus, ditto (lives in water, no fins

and/or scales) many primitive groups and China had pork as staple and weren't dying in droves.

you say OCCASIONALLY trichinosis and red tide. occasional isn't good enough (or bad enough.)

THE PRACTICAL PURPOSE WAS RITUAL HOLINESS to be set apart and to cultivate a mindset
that distinguishes one thing from another. THIS IS EXPLICITLY STATED IN THE MOSAIC LAW.
get context. Does God create abomination? of course not. these things were only abominable
in some contexts, not inherently. obedience lacks practical purpose? the practical purpose is

HUMILITY TOWARDS GOD and alienation from culturally similar therefore theologically dangerous

pagan neighbors.

read through Exodus and Leviticus and when God says not to worship Him the way the heathen

worshipped their gods, He does NOT incl. incense and liturgy but a short list of evils.

God later expressed disgust with incense and offerings, the CONTEXT is that these people doing

these things which He ordered in Exodus and Leviticus are doing them in hypocrisy, worshipping

other gods on the side besides YHWH. And Jeremiah doesn't describe the process
of making a Christmas tree but an idol.

Anonymous said...


Chritine Irksome writing those words to others is beyond laughable. She's still batting zero about the whole idea, but unstopped she posts beyond her limit, proving she argues because it's the only tool in her toolbelt. She remains frightfully destitute of true biblical wisdom, or any semblance of good manners and reasonable discourse. Mere hash....

And, most assuredly, the very last thing she will ever be accused of, is humility.

Craig said...


Thanks for responding. I saw the Kim Dotcom link to Rich on YouTube. This will be interesting for sure.

Relatedly, I found a Snopes article centering on Rod Wheeler and the Fox News story. That Snopes article sure looked like “news” to me. In other words, I was surprised that Snopes jumped into this with an article that looked like “news” rather than just debunking a claim. I’d read before that Snopes is a really a left wing puppet. I dunno.

Christine wrote: I didn't back down AT ALL from ANYTHING.

In a way, that’s not exactly untrue. What you DID do is initially claim “no grammar ambiguity” against my claim that there was grammatical ambiguity (there are two ways to interpret the Greek); however, your follow-up answer didn’t “back down”, rather it just said: re syntax ambiguity Revelation was questioned because of poor writing style. So, you didn’t EXPLICITLY “back down”, though it was implicit.

In any case, I’ve made my case just above, so I won’t rehash. Clearly, you’ve backtracked to where you’d done a 360, then continued your attempts at obfuscation. I’ll let the readers decide whose position is the accurate portrayal of events.

Now, with this new stuff you’ve brought up…are you serious?! Where did I intimate that the Greek translated “the one who was slain” refers to the book of life?! Your comprehension is seriously lacking, Christine. Go argue with your wallpaper. You’ll do much better, I promise you.

The problem is that you don’t understand the Greek, and, hence, you’ve no idea what you’re talking about. As I suggested in my last comment on the other thread, you don’t have to believe me, just check the variations in English translations illustrating the very point I made in my initial comment on Revelation 13:8. That is, the grammar is grammatically ambiguous such that there are two possible renderings.

But, haven’t you—again—violated your once per week limit on posting?

Marko said...

Regarding Seth Rich, here's an interesting update from Diana West, who has been doing lots of good investigating lately:

Anonymous said...

What Newt Gingrich said about Seth Rich today (Sunday, May 21st on Fox & Friends):

The former House speaker appeared on the show to discuss the special counsel appointed to investigate alleged collusion between President Trump’s campaign and the Russian government. But Gingrich veered away from that and suggested another case to probe: The murder last summer of Seth Rich, a DNC data worker.
“We have this very strange story now of this young man who worked for the Democratic National Committee, who apparently was assassinated at four in the morning, having given WikiLeaks something like 53,000 emails and 17,000 attachments,” Gingrich said.
“Nobody's investigating that, and what does that tell you about what's going on? Because it turns out, it wasn't the Russians. It was this young guy who, I suspect, was disgusted by the corruption of the Democratic National Committee. He's been killed, and apparently nothing serious has been done to investigate his murder.”

Craig said...


Thanks for the Diane West link (I keep forgetting about her blog). Very helpful background. Many things I’d either forgotten or didn’t even know in the first place.

Anon 9:23:

So far I don’t think we have definitive proof that Rich was wikileaks dumper, so, unless I’m wrong, I think it a bit too premature for Rush to state things so dogmatically. But, I’ll keep my ears to the ground and my eyes peeled!

Susanna said...


I don't trust Snopes. I have also heard that they are a left wing puppet pretending to be debunkers of false news stories.

Regarding Kim Dotcom, the following is posted at Drudge:

Breaking: ‘Complete Panic’ at Highest Levels of DNC Over Kim DotCom’s Seth Rich Announcement

Carter May 21st, 2017 9:28 pm —1014 Comments

Saturday, an anonymous person who works in Washington DC, alleged on 4Chan’s /pol/ subgroup that high-ranking current and former Democratic Party officials are terrified of the Seth Rich murder investigation.

This comes after internet entrepreneur and hacker, Kim DotCom, admitted on Saturday that he was part of an operation along with Seth Rich to get stolen DNC emails to Wikileaks.

See als:

BOOM! Hannity Invites Hacker Kim Dotcom to Discuss Seth Rich on TV, Radio: ‘Buckle Up’
May 21, 2017

BOOM! Newt Gingrich Drops Seth Rich Bombshell: DNC Operative Was Behind Wikileaks DNC Email Release (Video)

...This morning Newt Gingrich dropped a bomb on FOX and Friends on the Seth Rich story.

“Newt Gingrch: People talk about was their influence from Russia? Does this mean they are going to look at the $500,000 paid to Bill Clinton? Does that mean they are going to look at the uranium deal that gave Russia 20% of the uranium while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State? …At the same time we have this very strange story now. This young man who worked for the Democratic National Committee who apparently was assassinated at 4 in the morning after having giving Wikileaks something like 53,000 emails and 17,000 attachments. Nobody’s investigating that. And what does that tell you about what is going on?

Susanna said...


I also want to thank you for posting the Diana West blog link! I haven't yet seen her take on the Seth Rich story which I am following closely. I am looking forward to reading it.

Susanna said...

Craig and Marko,,

Private investigator and former Washington DC police homicide detective Rod Wheeler hired by Seth Rich's family reportedly claimed that there is "tangible evidence" on Rich's computer confirming his communication with WikiLeaks in the weeks before his killing.

While there are reports that Seth Rich's family has denied Wheeler's allegations concerning Seth Rich's affiliation with WikiLeaks and the possibility of his murder being a political assassination, there are other reports to the effect that Clinton operatives have bamboozled and/or threatened Rich's family into silence.

Here is the incriminating Podesta e-mail chain:

The bottom line is that if it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Seth Rich was in fact the source of the DNC leaks, that truth would destroy the oft-repeated “Trump/Russia collusion” conspiracy theory the media is so actively and viciously involved in.

Stay tuned!

Susanna said...

Now that fox News is running the story, it is going to be hard for the "driveby media" and certain other entities to ignore it.

May 22, 2017 · 12:08 pm

Seth Rich Murder Story Takes Many Bizarre Twists And Turns

Seth Rich was reportedly a clandestine Bernie Sanders supporter. Ergo his outrage when Sanders got sandbagged. The so-called DNC "hacking" was not so much a hacking as it was a "handover."

Craig said...


I dunno. With the conflicting reports, it’s hard to determine the truth. And, disappointingly, some are propounding the problem by using some disproven (and some false) reports and basing their speculative analyses on that.

Here’s something I’d not seen yet, which is pertinent:

Bar manager: Cops never talked with staff about night Seth Rich was murdered

A manager of the Washington, D.C., bar where Democratic National Committee worker Seth Rich was last spotted hours before he was shot and killed last summer told WND that D.C. police officers never interviewed the bar’s staff or requested any evidence from the bar, including the bar’s surveillance video from that night, as part of an investigation into Rich’s murder.

The revelation backs up a claim made by a private investigator who worked on the case who said D.C. police were told to “stand down” on the investigation.

WND also can report that the investigator recently was ordered to “cease and desist” his work on the murder case.

“The police never asked for the surveillance video from that night,” a manager of Lou’s City Bar told WND.

His name is being withheld for this story.

He said the bar’s surveillance video runs in a cycle of 30 days and that, by now, any footage that may have existed of Rich the last night he was seen alive has been taped over.

Furthermore, the manager said police never asked for any other kind of evidence from the bar such as Rich’s bar receipt from that night…

The manager also said he’s not aware of the police ever interviewing any of the bar’s staff members as part of their investigation into Rich’s murder.

“The only time that I talked to police was during the memorial for Seth,” the manager said, noting that those conversations were more casual and friendly.

He did not believe the conversations were part of official police interviews regarding Rich’s murder investigation.

The statements back up a claim by private investigator Rod Wheeler – a retired D.C. police detective who was hired to independently investigate Rich’s murder – that police were told to stand down on Rich’s murder investigation.

Wheeler told FOX 5: “I have a source inside the police department that has looked at me straight in the eye and said, ‘Rod, we were told to stand down on this case and I can’t share any information with you.’ Now, that is highly unusual for a murder investigation, especially from a police department.”

Craig said...

I’m pretty much clueless about social media and online boards, but I DO know that 4chan and /pol/ have been going all-out to identify the so-called Antifa (which some clever individual noticed works as an anagram for “infant”—which I’d say describes the behavior of some) and other crime perpetrators, doing it faster than police (e.g. 4Chan Identifies [black] Man Who Threw Elderly [white] Woman in Pool at Party) . That said, they’re a formidable forensic force. Which brings me to:

Reddit and 4chan Trump supporters set out to prove Seth Rich murder conspiracy

...In what is being touted as one of the biggest breakthroughs, an anonymous 4chan user identified that Joseph [P.] Capone, the owner of the Lou’s City Bar where Rich had been drinking before his death, had been at the White House in the days before the killing.

Not only did he post pictures to his Facebook while there, his name appears on the White House visitor log.

Is this why the police never did talk with bar patrons?

Craig said...

I’ve found that reading the comments on sites can be even more enlightening, as sometimes anonymous commenters post pertinent info. I found the following. George Webb used to go to Lou’s Bar, and, consequently, has taken a deep interest into Rich’s death. Here’s one YouTube video, which gives a partial timeline—of course, the title tells us what he thinks:

Day 210.1. Hillary's Leakers and Hackers, Awan Brothers Saga Deepens

And this guy has been following the story, too. Apparently, a /pol/ anonymous poster claims to have been an intern, and describes the strange goings-on [the first 1:34 seconds are an infomercial]:

ER Doc Who Operated on Seth Rich Says He Was OK Until … , 1639

“[I am a] 4th-year surgery resident here who rotated from WHC (Washington Hospital Center) last year, it won’t be hard to identify me but I feel that I shouldn’t stay silent.”

”Seth Rich was shot twice, with three total gunshot wounds (Entry and exit, and entry). He was taken to the OR emergency where we performed and exlap and found a small injury to segment three of the liver which was packed and several small bowel injuries (pretty common for gunshots in the back exiting the abdomen), which we resected—12 cm of bowel and left him in discontinuity (didn’t hook everything back up) with the intent of performing a washout in the morning. He did not have any major vascular injuries or otherwise. I’ve seen dozens of worse cases than this which survived and nothing about his injuries suggested to me that he’d sustained a fatal wound.”

Anonymous said...

Regarding Seth Rich's death in July, 2016 - two key points jump out at me:

1) The 'motive' for his shooting was supposed to be an attempted robbery(?)... yet nothing was stolen. He still had his wallet (with cash), his watch, and his cell phone on him.

2) He was talkative all the way to the hospital... and his injuries were non-life threatening.

Craig said...

BREAKING: Manchester Arena blast - Several dead after 'explosion' at Ariana Grande concert

SEVERAL people have been killed following an explosion at an Ariana Grande concert at Manchester Arena this evening.

- Officers rush to Manchester Arena following reports of an explosion in the foyer area at around 10.30pm
- US singer Ariana Grande had just finished her performance when the explosion occurred
- Witnesses claim people were trampled as concertgoers tried to flee the stadium
- Greater Manchester Police have confirmed a number of people have died in the incident, with the death toll believed to be in "double figures" according to the BBC's Home Affairs Correspondent
- Bomb disposal units are now at the scene and the area has been cordoned off
North West Counter Terrorism Unit are treating it as a "possible terror incident"

Susanna said...


LOL I dunno either. I am not trying to make the case for or against the Seth rich murder being a political assassination. I am simply presenting the reports that are out there. Drudge is usually pretty careful about the stories he posts on his news site.

I saw one or two stories in which it was reported that D.C. police officers never interviewed the bar’s staff or requested any evidence from the bar where Seth Rich was last spotted hours before he was shot and killed last summer and never requested to view the bar’s surveillance video from that night, as part of an investigation into Rich’s murder.

What I do know is that this story is getting legs and does not appear to be going away any time soon. Even Rush Limbaugh devoted a segment of his program to the Seth Rich story just this afternoon. Ordinarily, he might have given a story like this "a good leaving alone" as radio talk show host Howie Carr often puts it.

Here is the Rush Limbaugh segment if you want to have a listen.

You are right about how enlightening it can be to read the comments on news sites.

Susanna said...

P.S. Craig,

This just posted at Gateway Pundit.

Rush Limbaugh: Kim Dotcom Tweeted Me, Said He Will Tell Me What Happened, “It Will Be Very Entertaining Hour” (Audio)

Jim Hoft May 22nd, 2017

I will be watching Hannity later to see what more he has to say about the Seth Rich murder.

Susanna said...

One of the callers on the Rush Limbaugh Show named Lisa from Cleveland, Ohio mentioned the Diana West blog Marko linked us to.

It was posted at Lucianne Goldberg's site.

Susanna said...

The latest on the Manchester Arena Blast.

Manchester Arena blast: 19 dead and about 50 hurt

Anonymous said...

D.C. surgeon who operated on Seth Rich: ‘The DNC staffer was alive and well after surgery, before a group of LEOS (law enforcement officers) showed up to the ICU’



Bombshell: Donna Brazile warned off private eye on Seth Rich murder

Ex-DNC chairwoman reportedly asked cops why investigator is 'snooping' into mysterious case

May 22, 2017

Anonymous said...

Suicide bomber who slaughtered 22 'was known to police': Attacker was CAUGHT on CCTV, claim sources as arrests are made across Manchester over arena massacre

Anonymous said...

ISIS claim responsibility for Manchester arena attack

Susanna said...

CBS News/ May 23, 2017, 8:52 AM

Manchester Bombing Suspect identified

Last Updated May 23, 2017 5:55 AM EDT

LONDON -- CBS News confirmed Tuesday that the man who blew himself up the previous night at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, England, was 23-year-old Salman Abedi, who was known to British authorities prior to the attack.

In a generic statement posted online, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) claimed responsibility for Abedi's suicide bomb attack, which left 22 people dead, including children, at one of the entrances to the Manchester Arena.

Officials said one man was arrested Tuesday in southern Manchester in connection with the attack, and urged people to avoid the center of the city as raids continued at addresses around the city.

Police and British Prime Minister Theresa May made it clear the focus of the investigation was to determine whether the bomber "was acting alone, or was part of a wider group." more....

Craig said...

WATCH LIVE: Former CIA Director Testifies At Open Hearing On Russia Trump Collusion Investigation

Check out the live chat on the page re: Seth Rich.

Susanna said...


There is supposed to be a "big reveal" from Kim Dotcom today.

By the way, I wonder if anyone is aware that Seth Rich was Jewish??????

The following is from the Rush Limbaugh Show yesterday. I know it is accurate and legit because I personally listened to it.

RUSH: And it ( i.e. guilty until proven innocent ) is not the principle on which the American judicial system is built. The accused do not have to prove anything. The accusers have to prove it. So if the media thinks there’s been collusion it’s up to them to prove it. There isn’t any proof. There is not any crime. That’s why they’re walking back impeachment. But the new avenue here, folks, are you aware of the name Seth Rich? Seth Rich worked the DNC. Seth Rich, he was murdered, DNC worker. The police said it was a botched robbery. He still had his wallet, car keys, lottery tickets, whatever else. Others are claiming that he was murdered because he was the leak from the DNC to WikiLeaks. And this story is now starting to get legs, that Seth Rich was murdered, it was a contract hire killing because he was leaking to WikiLeaks, he was the one. May have been a Bernie supporter. The only colluding and rigging here, folks, is the Democrat primary election. The DNC rigged it against — do you know that there’s a class-action lawsuit against the DNC over this now? There is a massive lawsuit against the DNC by Bernie supporters for him getting shafted. Seth Rich claims to have been — or there are people claiming. Kim Dotcom, the noted hacker, has now come forward and said he was working with Seth Rich to get the documents to WikiLeaks. That link is at the Drudge Report today. Kim Dotcom is a renowned, world famous computer hacker loved and adored by high-tech people for a host of reasons. In fact, I didn’t know this ’cause I do not… I don’t tweet; I don’t go on Twitter. Well, we have a Twitter account. We use it to promote and our Facebook page.......

......There were allusions to the fact even last fall that, you know, there were 30,000 Hillary emails from the 60,000 on her server that still are not accounted for. She gave 30,000 to the investigators claiming that those are the ones that are relevant.

The other 30,000, she deleted ’em ’cause they had nothing to do with anything. They had to do with Hillary’s daughter’s wedding and wedding reception and who got two scoops of ice cream and who didn’t, and there were things about yoga lessons, and who Clintons thought were nut jobs. She didn’t turn that stuff over but those emails are somewhere. Kim Dotcom claimed to know either where they were and could get them or know somebody who did, and I’m talking about this on the air. I didn’t know this, but back in March, Kim Dotcom tweeted me. He said, “Dear Rush Limbaugh: One day I will tell you on your show what really happened. Will be a very entertaining hour.” I didn’t know it until today when one of my webmasters (we powerful, influential members of the media have people like webmasters and stuff) told them about this. So, Mr. Dotcom, I just found out about it. I’m sorry. I didn’t mean to ignore your tweet. I didn’t know that it had happened. But this is a whole new avenue — and, folks, right now it’s conspiracy theory status, that Seth Rich was murdered because he… But it’s… Well, it’s just it’s… It won’t go away. It just won’t go away, that’s about it.


Susanna said...

P.S. Craig,

Thanks for posting the link to the hearing.

Anonymous said...


Craig said...


I'm definitely interested in Kim Dotcom's forthcoming comments on Hannity.

Your welcome on posting the YouTube link. Here's a previous exchange with Trey Gowdy. Gowdy is the MAN!!

"You Don't Do Evidence[,] Well I Do" Trey Gowdy Demands Answers On Trump Russia Collusion Investigation

Ex-CIA Chief Brennan kept appealing to "intelligence", refusing to call it "evidence". Yet, on this supposed "intelligence" he claims to have deemed it credible enough to give to FBI to investigate. Where's the beef?

Anonymous said...

Interesting timeline on the last days of Seth Rich...

June 30, 2016 time frame – The meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton happens on the Phoenix airport Tarmac.  (Hacker says this is surely when the Clinton crime syndicate got the scanned files or hard copies from Loretta Lynch allowing them to track the leaks to Seth Rich using special watermark software)
On July 5th, 2016 Seth was offered job directly with Hillary Camp according to the hacker.  (They must have offered him a ton of money to get him interested since we know he didn’t like Hillary from his Tweet saying he did trust Hillary shown below and was a Bernie Sanders Supporter)
On July 10th, 2016 Seth Rich was murdered!  Hacker reports this is why DNC never turned over their servers and wiped to erase all evidence

After Seth Rich was murdered, the DNC scum start blaming Russia for the leaks to cover their tracks!  My source says these documents are surely what Bill Clinton got in the Tarmac meeting with Loretta Lynch.  The Deep State software was used to track the leaks to Seth!  A week after the Tarmac meeting Seth Rich was hired by the DNC (to bring him into the trap) and four days later he was dead!

Susanna said...


IMHO, Brennan is a Democratic hack. And don't get me wrong. I don't hate Democrats per se. Just the socialists/communists/radical "progressives" pretending to be Democrats.......or even RINO's for that matter.

RE: Ex-CIA Chief Brennan kept appealing to "intelligence",....

Talk about an oxymoron!!!

Indeed "Where is the beef? There is no "beef!!!" It is a big "nothingburger!!!! Incidentally, the reason the libtards are walking back the "impeachment" meme and trying to morph it into "obstruction of justice" is because they have no impeachable offense to hang on Trump. Brennan himself said he was not even aware of any pushback against the investigation on Trump's part when rhetorically cornered by Trey Gowdy.

I agree that Gowdy is the MAN!!!! Listening to Gowdy question a libtard is "candy for the mind." :-)

By the way. This is the latest on the Kim Dotcom comments regarding Seth Rich. Either our man Kim is blowing smoke or he is cautiously consulting with his lawyers in order to avoid extradition.

Have you ever read Kim Dotcom's biography? A friend of mine pointed out to me the very interesting fact that it stops at 2014. In any case, Kim Dotcom is no mere nonentity.

KIM DOTCOM ( a.k.a. Kim Schmitz )

I will still be tuning in to Hannity to see if anything new develops.

It will also be interesting to see if Kim Dotcom tries to contact Rush Limbaugh again.

Susanna said...

Craig, Marko, et al,

Kim Dotcom was among the founders of the Internet Party.

The Internet Party is a political party in New Zealand promoting Internet freedom and privacy. It was founded in January 2014 with the support of Internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom. The party contested the 2014 New Zealand elections under an electoral alliance with the Mana Movement but failed to win any seats in the House of Representatives of New more...


In late December of 2016, Kim Dotcom hinted at the return of the Internet Party with a view to contesting the 2017 general election in New Zealand.

Kim Dotcom hints at return of the Internet Party

4:48 pm on 26 December 2016


....Under a short-term agreement with the Internet Party, a joint Internet Party and Mana Movement contested the 2014 general election, with the Mana Movement providing the first, third and fourth list candidates. Despite being funded by online millionaire Kim Dotcom, the Internet Party and Mana Movement failed to win a single seat. Dotcom, who was not a candidate because he is not a New Zealand citizen, told reporters as election results became clear, "I take full responsibility for this loss tonight because the brand—the brand Kim Dotcom—was poison for what we were trying to achieve." more...

One significant thing about the Mana Movement I noticed was this:

....Since its formation, Mana activists have been involved in multiple extra-parliamentary campaigns against the policies of the National Government. Mana activists were prominent in the local protests of the Occupy Movement, opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement and the privatisation of energy companies.....


Susanna said...


It is to be noted that Hillary Clinton was for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement before she seemingly appeared to waffle on it. After calling the TPP the "gold standard in trade agreements," she did a 180 and announced that she no longer supported it. Not many believed her.

Bernie Sanders was against the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. Sanders felt that it repeated many of NAFTA's mistakes and those of other bilateral trade treaties such as the Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China, which cost an estimated 2.7 million U.S. jobs.

The TPP repeats many of NAFTA’s mistakes and those of other bilateral trade treaties such as the Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China, which cost an estimated 2.7 million U.S. jobs. The Economic Policy Institute estimates that under the TPP we stand to lose more than 130,000 jobs to Vietnam and Japan alone. American workers would have to compete for jobs with workers in Vietnam, where the minimum wage is only 56 cents an hour.

The TPP also threatens Internet freedoms and civil liberties, collective bargaining rights, public and environmental health, food safety, and financial stability in this country. It endangers American sovereignty, by reducing our own ability to pass consumer-oriented laws.

It even weakens American democracy. The closed-door nature of the negotiation process has positioned Congress and the American people as passive recipients of public policy, rather than as agents of it. It has excluded the public and its elected representatives from a process that will have broad and deep implications in our everyday lives — although more than 500 corporations have been active participants.

The good news is that some lawmakers, union leaders, and grassroots activists are voicing their opposition. Because of WikiLeaks, public advocates and journalists have been able to pinpoint some contradictions between what government statements about the TPP and what is actually in the draft agreement. Senators like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have written letters to the U.S. Trade Representative in protest, and Sanders is using his increased visibility as a presidential candidate to educate millions on its economically harmful effects. more...

Seth Rich was reportedly a Bernie Sanders supporter.

Susanna said...


Another little fact that seems to get lost in the shuffle is the fact that Julian Assange is Australian and he was also against the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), or the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA), is a trade agreement which includes Australia as well as New Zealand.

WikiLeaks has also published leaked chapters of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which is a secretive trade agreement among twelve Pacific Rim countries, including the United States. It would allow them to cover 40 percent of the global economy. The agreement was reached just this past October, after seven years of negotiations.

But as these matters of economic concern continue to be negotiated amongst the countries, details continue to be hidden from the public while WikiLeaks discloses information, like the “Investment Chapter,” which discusses the US negotiators’ motive to allow corporations to sue governments if their laws disrupt future profits a company has declared. Assange says the plan could “chill” the approval of health and environmental administrations.

Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! sat down at the Edcuadorean Embassy in London for an exclusive interview with Assange to discuss the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the US debate of what WikiLeaks has revealed concerning the treaty more...

So now we have something that at least three people connected to this unsolved mystery had in common. Seth Rich, Kim Dotcom, and Bernie Sanders were all unequivocally against the Trans Pacific Trade Agreement!


Richard said...

"ISIS claim responsibility for Manchester arena attack"


Ariana Grande is 23 years old. It happened on the 22nd. Allegedly, the first call the police got was at 22.33. The first suspect they caught was 23 years old. The second suspect is 22 years old. 22 people allegedly died. The little child on the photo has the number 23 on her. I just checked the setlist of the concert. 22 songs were played. 'Ariana Grande Manchester' = 22 letters.

"The rocket bombs which fell daily on London were probably fired by the Government of Oceania itself, 'just to keep people frightened'."

George Orwell's 1984

Anonymous said...

22/05/17 5+17=22

Anonymous said...

Richard @ 4:47 PM

You post makes absolutely no sense.

Anonymous said...


You're posting excessively and more than your limit. Back off.

Unknown said...

Wonderful blog.. Thanks for sharing informative Post. Its very useful to me.

Installment loans
Payday loans
Title loans

Craig said...

"The Day You Left Office Classified Information Appeared On The Front Page" Trey Gowdy's Pissed

[Title is misleading, as Gowdy never says the quoted portion.]

Trey Gowdy asks former CIA Director Brennan some specific questions regarding the leaks, one of which Brennan responds with, “That’s an excellent question.” Without skipping a beat, Gowdy responds with, “What would be an equally excellent answer?” LOL. That’s not ‘like a boss’; Gowdy IS the boss!

Anonymous said...

The reason why the Deep State Globalists are trying to shut Sean Hannity up... is because he is getting too close to the truth as to why Seth Rich was murdered... which will DESTROY the 'Trump Russia collusion' narrative!!!

Also, Rupert Murdoch's two LIBERAL sons, Lachlan and James (heirs to their father's network) are trying to steer the network in another political 'direction'... which is why you might find yourself scratching your head lately as to why they are 'dropping like flies' over at Fox News.

Anonymous said...

I received this in an email. I haven't verified the information but if what the writer says is true it' very disturbing.

Don’t believe the fake-media story that Trump made a mistake or huge gaffe by firing Comey.
Don’t believe the media narrative from the left that it was an attempt to silence Comey from some investigation into Trump.

Don’t believe the RINO narrative that Comey is a good guy just trying to do his job in terrible circumstances and the timing was bad.
Don’t believe the lie that Comey was admired and respected by career FBI investigators and agents.
Don’t believe the lie that Trump’s “tweets" are not professional and have no strategic purpose. His tweets are weaponized and deadly.

James Comey is a poisonous snake of the highest order… a deep-water Swamp Denizen who has been highly paid to deliberately provide cover for high-level corruption by the Clintons and Obama. He is has been central to trying to destroy the Trump campaign and then the Trump administration from the start. He is as dirty as they come in DC. He had highest-level cover (the FBI no less) and was deep into an effort to eliminate Trump. Trump had to move hard, fast, and at exactly the right time to cut the head off the snake without getting bitten by the snake or being finished by the other swamp denizens.

Begin by noticing how the President fired Comey when Comey was 3,000 miles away from his office, that Comey had no inkling he was being cut, that all his files, computers, and everything in his office were seized by his boss Sessions and the justice department. This was not a violation of protocol, it was tactical. Notice how Prez Trump compartmentalized the strike and did not inform any of his White House “staff” to prevent leaks. Notice how he emasculated Comey and the swamp denizens by letting them know in a tweet that the Attorney General got information (surveillance “tapes” from the seizure of Comey’s office) to let Comey and his handlers know that Trump’s DOJ has the goods on them. This was a brilliant, strategic and totally imperative move at exactly the right time against horrible, evil and corrupt powers infesting our government.

The swamp is on notice that the President is on to them, they are sweating bullets because their criminal games of corruption are being pursued and they know it. They are screaming and ranting because they are desperate denizens of the swamp who are beginning to realize they are roadkill.

THIS IS WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE COMEY SCAM. Taken from credible public sources (readily available if you want to look or want me to sent them to you), with a few reasonable “fill in the blank” conclusions of my own.

The Highlights:

Comey was a minor assistant US attorney in the late 90’s. He only gained power and money by being the DOJ official who “investigated” and cleared Bill Clinton of any wrong-doing in Clinton's totally corrupt pardon (for huge payoffs) of criminal financier Marc Rich as Clinton was leaving the Presidency. This is how Comey began his career as a creature of the “swamp” years ago, as a servant of the Clintons.

Comey provided “cover” for the Clintons in their gaining incredible power and wealth after leaving office through pardoning a billionaire money-launderer, arms dealer and criminal. Comey was a key piece in how the Clintons upped their corruption game and gained incredible wealth through their foundation after leaving the White House. A huge part of the scheme was giving Marc Rich a free pass when he should have spent life in prison, and that is what Comey covered-up for the Clintons. This set up Comey to be part of the corruption machine, making him powerful and wealthy.

Anonymous said...


Immediately after doing the Clinton’s dirty work as a DOJ official, Comey resigned from the DOJ and took a position as the head attorney (Counsel) of the Lockheed Martin company, a huge military contractor. While he was in that position Lockheed became a major contributor (millions) to the Clinton Foundation and its fake charity spin-offs. In return for these payment to Clinton Inc., Lockheed received huge contracts with Hillary’s state department. Comey was the chief legal officer of Lockheed throughout this period of contributions to Clinton Inc. in return for State Dept. contracts.

In late 2012, after overseeing Lockheed’s successful relationship with the Hillary State Department and the resulting profits, Comey stepped down from Lockheed and received a $6 million dollar payout for his services.

In 2013, the largest bank of England, HSBC Holdings, was deep into a scandal. Investigations by federal authorities and law-enforcement had revealed that for years HSBC had been laundering billions of dollars for Mexican Drug Cartels, channeling money for Saudi banks who were financing terror, moving money for Iran in violation of the sanctions, and other major criminal activity. HSBC’s criminality was pervasive and deliberate by the Bank and its officials. HSBC was a huge Clinton Foundation contributor (many millions) throughout the “investigation” and Bill Clinton was being paid large personal fees for speaking at HSBC events (while Hillary was Sec of State). Eric Holder and the Obama Justice Department did what they were paid to do, and let HSBC off of the hook for a paltry 1.2 Billion dollar fine (paid by its stockholders), and not one Director, officer or management member at HSBC was fired or charged with any criminal. Exactly when everyone involved with HSBC Bank (including the Clintons and all of their “donors”) were being let off without penalty, and cover had to be provided to HSBC, Comey was appointed as a Director and Member of the Board of HSBC (in the middle of the fallout from the scandal). He was part of the effort to cover up the scandal and make HSBC “respectable” again.

Anonymous said...


After about a year as HSBC director, despite his lack of any law enforcement experience, no DOJ leadership experience, and no qualifications for the job, Comey was appointed FBI director by Obama. The only qualification Comey had was that the Clinton’s and their cronies knew Comey was in bed with them, was compromised and was willing to do their dirty work. Comey was appointed to the FBI right when Hillary was leaving the State Department, and was vulnerable to the FBI because she had been using a private-server, mis-handling classified information, selling access to favors/contracts from the State Department to Clinton Foundation Donors (including Comey’s Lockheed Martin), and much more. Remember that this was about the time the Inspector General of the State Department found over 2 billion “missing” from the State Department finances during Hillary's tenure.

The obvious conclusion is that Comey was appointed to the FBI (along with other reliable Clinton-Obama cronies) to run interference for the Clinton’s and Obama’s at the nation’s federal law enforcement agency(in conjunction with a corrupt Department of Justice). Comey was and is owned by the Clintons. He owed all of his power and wealth to being part of their machine and providing them with cover.

In late 2015 and early 2016, information began to come out about the Clinton Foundation and its use by the Clinton’s as a multi-billion dollar slush fund for corruption and political favors. (even Chelsea’s wedding had been paid for by the “charity) This was right as Hillary was beginning her campaign for President. It was revealed that the Foundation had never completed required reports or had an audit. Supposedly the FBI, under Comey, began an “investigation” of the Clinton Funds. A “professional” accounting firm was brought in by the Clintons to do a review, file some reports, make recommendations to the Clinton Foundation Board, and provide a veneer of legitimacy to the Clinton Fund operations. Predictably, one of the partners in the firm that was chosen (and paid lots of money) is the brother of James Comey (FBI Director). This brother owes James Comey $700,000 for a loan James gave him to buy a house, and presumably some of the money from the Clinton Fund was used to make payments to James on the loan. Over 2 years later and nothing has happened as a result of the FBI “investigating” the Clinton Funds under Comey.

Anonymous said...


No one in congress or federal law enforcement was intending to actually pursue the Clintons, but Judicial Watch and other independent sources obtained information proving that Hillary had been running her own server, sending out classified information, etc. This information began to come out right in the middle of her campaign to be coronated as President. A “show” investigation had to be performed to appear to look into it and clear her. Who to use?...the reliable shill James Comey.

As head of the FBI, Comey (and his lackeys in key positions) deliberately screwed up the investigation into Hillary’s use of a private server and her plain violation of national security law on classified information. The investigation was deliberately mis-handled in every aspect. Comey gave immunity to all of Hillary’s lackeys, did not use subpoenas or warrants, lost evidence, allowed the destruction of evidence, failed to do any searches or seizures of evidence, did not use a grand-jury, did not swear witnesses, did not record testimony, allowed attorneys to represent multiple suspects (corrupting the testimony). Everything that could be done to ruin the FBI investigation and to cover for Hillary was done. A “slam-dunk” case became a mess. Immunity was given every witness even though they provided no help. Maybe more importantly, by focusing the FBI on the email scandal, attention was drawn away from the much bigger scandal of the Clinton Foundation that could bring down a huge number of corrupt politicians, lobbyists, and even governments.

Originally, Comey’s job was simply to totally botch the Hillary investigation and ruin the case against her and her minions within the FBI regarding he emails. At the same time Comey also started work on a parallel assignment to illegally “wiretap” and surveil Donald Trump and every other person involved in the Republican campaign. He was tasked with digging up any dirt or fact that could be used to hurt the Trump campaign later. This included using a fake “dossier” paid for by the Clinton campaign to obtain authorization for the surveillance and to try to associate Trump’s campaign with the Russians. Under Comey’s direction the Trump/republican campaign was monitored and surveilled and all information was provided to the Obama Whitehouse and the Clinton camp all during the campaign.

Lorretta Lynch was supposed to complete the coverup for Hillary as Attorney General by issuing a finding that the deliberately botched FBI “investigation” did not justify prosecution of Hillary. But someone screwed up and Bill Clinton was video’d meeting with Loretta Lynch in Arizona shortly before she was supposed to make her decision on Hillary (interference with a federal investigation), and Lynch could no longer credibly squash the Hillary scandal. The solution, give the job to James. The Clinton’s owned him and he would have to do whatever is necessary to provide cover.

Anonymous said...


Comey goes on national TV and violates every rule of the FBI, the Justice Department and American law enforcement by revealing some of the FBI’s “evidence” of what Hillary did (enough to make it look like the FBI and Comey did some investigation), then declaring that there was no “intent” and clearing Hillary. He did what he was ordered to do. The Justice Department and Obama backed Comey’s coverup and it looked like Hillary had survived the scandal.

Then, right before the election, the NYPD obtained pervert Anthony Wiener’s laptop and found classified emails from Hillary on the laptop. The NYPD began leaking details to new-media outlets, and the story was about to explode. Comey once again stepped in to cover Hillary. He short-circuited the NYPD leaks by publicly acknowledging the laptop and the emails, but then claimed just days later that hundreds of thousands of emails had all been reviewed and “nothing new” was on the laptop. Once again, he had done his job. Providing cover and FBI “protection” for Hillary on the newest scandal when it broke.

If Hillary had won, Comey would have kept right on providing cover for the corruption of the Clinton machine. He would have kept the FBI paralyzed, prevented the Clinton Fund from being investigated, and continued to do his job as the Clinton’s personal scandal eraser at the FBI.


The Swamp and its bottom-dwelling denizens realize they are at risk from this political outsider who is not connected to the uni-party machines. Before Trump takes office, a “failsafe” plan is implemented to ruin Trump’s administration and try to force him out of the Presidency. The key players committed to the plan are the democrat politicians, the RINO establishment, the media, the Obama-Clinton operatives imbedded throughout the intelligence agencies and the entire bureaucracy, and most importantly, the Obama DOJ and JAMES COMEY. The scheme is to smear Trump with Russian “connections,” through a fake FBI “investigation” and more importantly, to trap him into a charge of criminal interference with the FBI. COMEY IS THE CENTRAL FIGURE IN THE SCHEME TO TAKE DOWN TRUMP.

The surveillance of the Trump campaign is continued after he is elected, all participants are “unmasked” illegally, and the transcripts are leaked throughout the government and to the media. When General Flynn appropriately calls Russian officials on behalf of Trump, they brush off the old fake “dossier” and all of the surveillance of the campaign, and Comey creates the “Russian Conspiracy” investigation. With help by RINO swamp kingpin and warmonger sell-out McCain, the fake "Russian pee dossier” is leaked to the press. There is no actual evidence of any collusion or connection between Trump or his campaign with Russia, but that does not prevent Comey from initiating an “investigation” at the FBI. This provides Comey with protection from Trump firing him immediately. Comey (or his minions) constantly leak news of the “Russia Investigation” to the media, and the media does its scripted part by screaming constantly about “Russia.” The Democrats fill their role and constantly scream about “Russia.” McCain and the RINO establishment do their part by promising to “investigate” how the Russians influenced the campaign.

Immediately after Trump is sworn in, the DOJ Hillary/Obama operatives and Comey start the direct attack. This is before Sessions has been appointed to the Department of Justice and the DOJ is still controlled by Obama operatives. DOJ Obama appointee Sally Yates approaches the Whitehouse with news that General Flynn had been in contact with Russia and alleges that he might be compromised. She reveals that there is an FBI “investigation” into the Russia ties (which they are constantly leaking to the media themselves). The White House Counsel (who Yates talks to, not Trump) asks for some more information.

Anonymous said...


The day before the promised additional information is to be provided by Yates to the Whitehouse, Comey sets up a dinner with Trump. If he can get Trump to ask about Flynn or try to intervene regarding Flynn or Russia then Trump can be charged with “interfering with an FBI investigation.” MY OPINION IS THAT COMEY SURVEILLED AND “TAPED” THIS MEETING IN HIS ATTEMPT TO SET UP TRUMP.

This is a two-pronged attack. It protects Comey and DOJ democrat holdovers from being terminated by the new administration because they are involved in an “ongoing investigation” that they control the timetable on(albeit one with absolutely no evidence). If Trump fires Comey then he is “interfering with the investigation” which is itself a federal crime that the FBI could then “investigate.” Alternatively, if they can get Trump to question Comey about Flynn or try to get him to back off of Flynn or the “Russia” investigation, then they again have him “interfering.”

Trump knows it is a set up by Comey and that he is probably being recorded (tips from FBI or DOJ who are not part of the corruption?) Maybe because his phone calls in the Whitehouse as President have already been bugged and released to the media. (FBI is in the best position to do this) Maybe because he was used to the Mafia in NY trying to shake him down every time he built a hotel. Comey tells Trump that Trump is not under investigation regarding Russia, but that others involved with the campaign are being investigated. Trump does not take the bait and attempt to intervene about Flynn or the Russia scam. Later, Flynn is cut loose because he is being used by Comey and the Obama-holdover Justice to try to damage Trump. He did not thing wrong, but if he stayed the charge of “interfering with an investigation” might seem to have teeth. Comey verbally tells Trump on two more occasions that he is not being investigated, but refuses to state this fact publicly or when testifying in Congress.

Trump knows everything I have gone through above about Comey. But he has to move carefully. He has to get his Attorney General and Deputy AG in place, get enough leverage on the Russia narrative, and ideally get rid of Comey in a way that allows him to obtain all the information that Comey has been accumulating (if he is taping Trump he is taping others). Comey, and others testify in Congress. Under oath, both Sally Yates and Intelligence officials from the Obama administration state that there has been no actual evidence of any collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. More importantly, Comey, while refusing to say that Trump is not under investigation, testifies that he has informed the Senate Intelligence Committee heads who exactly is under investigation regarding Russia.

Trump tells almost no one at the White House that he is moving against Comey (so no leaks… no listening in on his conversations) Trump somehow contacts Sen. Grassley (the Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee) and confirms that Comey told the Senator that Trump was not under investigation personally. Trump gets both the Attorney General and the new Deputy Attorney General to legitimately review Comey’s unprofessional actions at the FBI and to recommend in writing that Trump terminate Comey. Somehow Comey goes to California (at the request of AG Sessions or already scheduled and someone at FBI telling Trump?).

Anonymous said...


Trump seizes the moment and acts. While Comey is in California, 3000 miles away and 7 hours from his office, Trump prepares a letter firing him (with Sessions and the Deputy AG recommendations attached). In the letter Trump states that he had been told 3 times by Comey that he (Trump) was not under investigation. The letter is hand-delivered to the FBI headquarters by DOJ officials to lock-down and seize everything in Comey’s office, including all surveillance files (“tapes”) of Trump and others. All of Comey’s files, docs, computers and “tapes” are taken to Sessions at DOJ. They are not taken to the Whitehouse or Trump, but to Sessions, who has every right to have them. Sessions can tell Trump that Comey had surveillance tapes of Trump that contradict what Comey has been telling Trump, and perhaps tapes of conversations with other swamp “conspirators.” But Trump does not have them personally or at the Whitehouse.

Comey learns he has been fired when the media broadcasts it in California. He had no idea it was coming and he is ticked. On cue, the Democrat politicians and media begin screaming about Trump’s “interference with the Russia investigation” in accordance with the plan to set up Trump for that charge. The Swamp wants to blow up the Russia narrative using Comey, and Comey is set to testify before Congress to try to hurt Trump by saying he was interfering with the FBI investigation. Comey intends to follow through with the plan to take down Trump.
But because of his brilliant timing on this, Trump has Comey’s files, documents and information safely with Sessions at DOJ. Trump sends out a “crazy” tweet that says: “James Comey better hope that there are no “tapes” of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press.”

Anonymous said...

The media and the politicians go crazy about the “inappropriateness” of this tweet. They accuse Trump of “taping” everyone at the WhiteHouse (forgetting that the Presidents phone calls with foreign leaders have been “taped” without his knowledge.)

Notice that Trump did not say he taped anyone, or that he has any tapes at the White House. It seem apparent that Trump is telling Comey that the DOJ (who has every legal right to possess it) has the surveillance information and files from Comey’s office, the “tapes" obtained and kept by Comey. Comey and all the Swamp Creatures understand the clear message… their plan has failed and Trump’s DOJ is now holding all the cards.

The whole Russia interference scheme crashes and burns. While the mouthpiece media, Hollywood and the insane fringe continue to scream about Russia and Comey being fired, the politicians who will soon be in the crosshairs of a legitimate (and ticked) FBI and DOJ are starting to fall strangely silent. Comey realizes all the leverage is with Trump and that he will be lucky if he is not added to the Clinton Death List because of his knowledge (better not take any baths near an electrical outlet or get on any airplanes).

Comey tells Congress he will not testify and writes a public letter to the FBI accepting his firing and telling them he does not want to discuss why or how he was terminated. Senator Grassley and Senator Feinstein (she must be covering her butt in fear …) issue public statements confirming that Comey told them that the “Russia Investigation” does not involve President Trump personally.

AG Sessions and his Deputy AG use the Comey trove of information to determine who has been part of the Comey Syndicate at the FBI. They will be appointing an “interim” Director of the FBI shortly who has not been compromised by Comey, Clinton or Obama. That “interim” Director does not have to be approved by Congress or anyone, and can immediately begin cleaning house at the FBI of all Comey/Clinton/Obama minions, initiating investigations of the Clintons, Clinton Fund, violations of intelligence confidentiality laws by Susan Rice and Obama, human trafficking in DC, political corruption… draining the Swamp. Using the Comey files they can be fairly certain they are not getting another Comey as an “interim", and they do not have to wait for the circus of appointing a new permanent “Director” through Congressional approval. Most of the heavy lifting on rooting out FBI corruption and starting investigations into the swamp will be done by the “interim” before a new director is appointed. I suspect the Trump administration hopes the approval FBI Director process will be slow and tedious, so there is no political interference with the housecleaning that is starting.

Anonymous said...


In one masterstroke, Trump has eliminated a truly toxic and dangerous enemy to his administration and our country, dealt a horrendous blow to the Clinton/Obama and deep state machines, begun the restoration of the integrity of the FBI and the DOJ, and gained incredible ammunition to begin hunting the foul creatures in the swamp.

Craig said...

Interesting analysis/synopsis. And this just before Trump heads out on his first international trip.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

MCE @ 6:19 PM can't help herself!
The urge to argue, and insult and disparage others, is too strong!

Anonymous said...

Wher has the one post a week agreement with MCE gone

Anonymous said...

She crawled out of her own swamp again, and then again, to abuse the blog with more than the allotted once a week urge to scourge.

She proves again what we know too well, she is a real piece of work.

Craig said...

I mentioned earlier how 4chan, /pol/ has been quite capably identifying perpetrators of crimes by studying YouTube video clips, and, well, here’s another example. And I can’t be happier, as I saw the crimes this dirtbag perpetrated. He used a U-shaped bike lock to assault pro-freedom of speech/Trump supporters in Berkeley, on April 15th. Here’s the news story on his arrest (finally!):

Police arrest Eric Clanton after bike lock assaults during Berkeley protests

Eric Clanton, a former teacher at Diablo Valley College, was arrested by Berkeley police on Wednesday on suspicion of three counts of assault with a deadly weapon identified as a U-lock bike lock, and one of those assaults is alleged to have caused a significant injury.

Police say the violence happened April 15 in Civic Center Park in Berkeley when pro-Trump supporters clashed with self-described anti-fascist, or “antifa,” activists determined to stop a rally where white supremacist views were expected to be expressed.

Soon after April 15, 28-year-old Clanton was “outed” online, on the website 4chan, as someone who used a bike lock to strike a man in the head. The assault was captured in a video clip (below) that drew widespread attention and anger after it was posted on YouTube.

A rousing round of applause for /pol/!!

Maybe the cowardly so-called “antifa” will think twice in how they demonstrate in the future.

Craig said...

We’re not hearing enough about the negative impact of the refugee crisis in Europe. Perhaps the following provides at least a partial explanation. In Sweden, a 70 year old woman is charged with “Hate Speech” for posting a photo and the truth about some of the refugees.

Woman, 70, Says Migrants Defecate In Streets, Set Cars on Fire. Cops Charge Her With Hate Crime.

Authorities in Sweden are prosecuting a 70-year-old woman for a hate crime.

Her alleged crime? She wrote on Facebook that she saw migrants defecating in the streets and setting fire to cars.

Sweden has allowed hundreds of thousands of refugees to pour in over the last few years, quickly devolving from a bucolic Nordic paradise it into a crime-infested, rape-ridden nation. Police officers there have acknowledged that they have "no-go zones" — places filled with refugees that they can't safely enter and police. Leading feminists have moved out of urban areas to avoid misogynistic refugees.

Yet staunch feminists will not speak out about this. Instead they talk about supposed first world problems such as the fallacious gender pay gap. [If this were really true, basic economics says that employers would hire only females, since their labor is cheaper, and, typically, labor is the largest expense.]

As refugees poured into the country in 2015, the woman charged with a hate crime wrote a Facebook post that said migrants “set fire to cars, and urinate and defecate on the streets," according to FriaTider, an online magazine.

After a lengthy probe, prosecutors in Sweden decided that the post violated the nation’s law on incitement to racial hatred, FriaTider wrote. If the pensioner is found guilty, she faces four years in prison. The woman acknowledges that she posted the comments but says she did not commit a crime.

Things have gone from bad to worse in Sweden. Just last month, two migrants were given lenient sentences for horrific crimes they committed, sent to jail for less than four years for nearly beating a young man death before violently raping his female friend.

Where’s the feminist outrage?

Lauren Southern went to Europe, providing an account of her time just outside, not inside, what are known as “no-go zones” in Paris suburbs: STORY TIME: No-Go Zones

Thomas Ivan Dahlheimer said...

"When asked what they would do if scientists were to disprove a particular religious belief, nearly two-thirds (64%) of [American] people say they would continue to hold to what their religion teaches rather than accept the contrary scientific finding, according to the results of an October 2006 Time magazine poll."

When Jesse Ventura was the Governor of Minnesota he said: Organized religion is a sham and a crutch for weak-minded people who need strength in numbers.

Jesus said: ...for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat.

Do most of America's Christians really care what the truth is, or are they just going in the "broad way" because they are "weak mined" and only interested in receiving "strength in numbers" as well as the social and economic benefits for being in conformity with the majority?

Anonymous said...

If it's not Chritine it's Trollheimer ... the pair should be banned! I notice Walid Shoebat has banned her, where she used her infowolf screen name, with the words "wolf, be gone!", the same should happen here!

Anonymous said...

Well if Jesse Ventura said it, it must be true!

Anonymous said...

This is what Walid Shoebat had to say about MCE aka Chritine the disinfowolf:

"Previously she stated she was charismatic pentecostal."

"She even mocked the birth of Christ in another comment regarding the story of Onan's "wasted seed" mocking how this could be the line where Christ came from."

"This is no Orthodox, not even a charismatic Pentecostal Evangelical. This is someone who is in disguise and is dishonest and believes not in Christ."

" Its an impostor and for years I put up with them reveals my patience. So finally it is wolf be gone. There is no room for dishonest people who cover up who they really are."

Looks like Walid sussed out who she really is!

Anonymous said...

Anon 10:44 AM

Oh! And she didn't get to chakras, vampires and aliens yet?

Craig said...

Migrants? Refugees? Poland ain’t havin’ it!

This is an excellent video showing how Poland would rather face sanctions from the EU than bring in migrants, in view of what’s happening in the rest of EU nations. The cost/benefit analysis fails.

Squatting Slav TV: Mighty Poland will not bow to Islam/EU

paul said...

Strength in numbers?
Christians who are only in it for the strength in numbers???
Who, where?
What strength in numbers, where, are you talking about Dahlheimer?
I live in the USA and Christianity is not now nor ever has been the majority.
Christianity does not hold power here or rule here. Christians are not
coddled here now, if they ever were.
On the contrary Hollywood and the rest of the media have basic
fundamental Christians on the run.
Sodomites and Satanists are the ruling class here and abroad.
The Unseen Hand is a bunch of hedonistic, filthy minded, spoiled,
elitist, pagan Freemasons and their rulers the Jesuits.

Why would you try to paint some other picture Dahlheimer?

Listen to the dialogue on any evening sit-com TV show, and tell me that
it's not written by some gay guys in a room together making huge
amounts of money for all their "labors".
Listen to Anderson Cooper do his best to sound objective and logical
about hot button issues when you know he hates Christianity and Christians.
Listen to Rachel Maddow spoon feed the millions of self righteous progressives
exactly what they want to hear night after night, and basically lie through her
progressive, smirking pie hole, always on the side of antichristianity and
globalist one-world foolishness.

Why are you twisting the truth of the matter Dahlheimer?
To attend a real Christian Church these days is like putting a target on your back.

Anonymous said...

"The Unseen Hand is a bunch of hedonistic, filthy minded, spoiled,
elitist, pagan Freemasons and their rulers the Jesuits... To attend a real Christian Church these days is like putting a target on your back."

Exactly, Paul, you've got it in one!

Dahlheimer is deceived and out to decieve, he twists the truth because he is of his father the Devil, the father of lies!

Anonymous said...

4:01 PM, your comment,"Oh! And she didn't get to chakras, vampires and aliens yet?", is more astute than some may give it credit for. Christine has never recanted such beliefs here (where for so long she disseminated such along with her other nonsense.),
let alone expressed any regret or remorse for having placed a potential stumbling block for those still searching or very young in Jesus Christ. At least she's restricted to posting once a week now, when she sticks to it of course!

Craig said...

I didn’t know there was a new—month old—Planned Parenthood video illustrating the sale of body parts. In the following, Dr. DeShawn Taylor talks about aborting fetuses up to 24 weeks, and the difficulty at that gestation. Maybe that’s because the baby is fighting for its life!!.

Planned Parenthood Abortionist: "Pay Attention to Who's In the Room" to Deal With Infants Born Alive

“…It’s not about how I feel about it coming out intact, I gotta worry about my staff and people’s feelings about—they come out lookin’ like a baby…I mean the key is, you’ve got to see who is in the room…”

“I feel pretty good, I mean my market share of the abortion services just—it continues to increase.”

Constance Cumbey said...

wow ABOUT ABOVE POSTINGS -- I was about to put up a new post, but what is posted in the comments section requires digestion. I've had a busy court schedule lately, trying unsuccessfully to be "semi-retired" for writing time and my clients keep getting into messes and begging for my legal help -- glad I could and did help with their respective situations. We have had significant deaths in the New Age - Globalist world in the past few months:

Maurice Strong: Died November 27, 2015.

Paul N. Temple - Core group member of Doug Coe's C Street operation and CO-FOUNDER OF NEW AGE ORGANIZATION, INSTITUTE OF NOETIC SCIENCES, died in California on November 30, 2016. The obituary talked of his deep faith in Jesus. For the sake of his soul, I hope it was true; but his Institute of Noetic Sciences site talked equally passionately about his deep devotion to their causes.

David Rockefeller - died March 17, 2016.

Zbigniew Brezinski - died today, May 26, 2017.

I'm sure batons have been passed -- I'm still looking to see who were the heirs apparent who may have succeeded them in their efforts.

I'll be doing my radio program in the morning. Please join me at at 10 am Eastern Time (7 am Pacific time).

Many thanks to the anonymous contributor posting the most interesting information about the Trump administration and James Comey. I'm still digesting the valuable and provocative material.


Craig said...

More on Seth Rich:

Proof That DNC Manufactured the Russian Controversy in June 2016

I’ve not studied this at length, and I’m not sufficiently technically informed to judge its validity, but this is worth looking at.

Thomas Ivan Dahlheimer said...

Paul wrote: "What strength in numbers, where, are you talking about Dahlheimer?
I live in the USA and Christianity is not now nor ever has been the majority."

According to a 2014 study by the Pew Research Center, 70.6% of the adult population identified themselves as Christians. 70.06 % is a majority Paul.

All around the world great multitudes of little children get brainwashed to believe in the
popular/dominate religion of their nation and region of the world and most of them remain in that religious delusional state of mind the rest of their lives. A lot of them believe that if they do not remain in the religion of their youth they will burn in Hell forever. And they try to get everyone in the world to converted to their religion (or to their "loving God") so that they will not have to "burn in Hell forever." They are victims of childhood propaganda indoctrination and majority serving psychological terrorism.

Craig said...

Martin Shkreli Drops $100K Bounty For Info On Seth Rich’s Murderer

American businessman and investor Martin Shkreli is putting up $100,000 for information leading to the arrest of the person responsible for the murder of Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich.

Shkreli, former chief executive officer of Turing Pharmaceuticals and KaloBios Pharmaceuticals Inc., made the announcement via his Facebook page Friday.

…Shkreli is not the only person offering a six digit reward for information surrounding Rich’s death. Washington D.C. attorney Jack Burkman is offering $105,000 and calling on the DNC to step up its role in the investigation. “I don’t know who is worse, the DNC — who haven’t done a thing, or Sean Hannity who talks about it every night without action. All talk, no action,” Burkman told the Daily Caller News Foundation Wednesday.

While police have refused to divulge information on the case to the public, The Daily Caller News Foundation obtained the public incident report, which revealed that at least three responding officers were wearing body cameras. When TheDCNF reached out to the police for information regarding the presence of body cams or surveillance footage near the scene of the crime, the department refused to confirm or deny the existence of surveillance footage.

Rich’s parents asked police to go public with details of its investigation this week, desperately hoping to find their son’s killer.

Craig said...

USAA’s Excuse For Pulling Ads From ‘Hannity’ Is Full Of Holes

USAA was among several advertisers to pull their ads from “Hannity” following his airing of a conspiracy theory surrounding the death of murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich. Left-wing nonprofit Media Matters kickstarted the public pressure campaign after posting a list of Hannity’s advertisers, leading reporters from BuzzFeed and other liberal news sources to begin contacting advertisers and asking if they would stand by Hannity.

USAA claimed to have pulled the ads because its policy is to only air ads on “news programs,” rather than “opinion shows.”

But the insurance company’s claim doesn’t match the record, the Media Research Center found.

USAA advertised on Rachel Maddow’s show. They advertised on Lawrence O’Donnell’s show. They advertised on Chris Hayes’ show. All three of those shows are known for being presented from a liberal point of view. The company has yet to return a call seeking an explanation for the apparent discrepancy.

USAA members upset with the decision to pull ads from Hannity’s show have flooded its Facebook page with comments expressing their anger.

“I will no longer be doing business with a company who claims to represent the military, but who caves to the wishes of the Progressive interest groups who are trying to silence conservative talk radio and Fox News,” one man commented.

“After almost 40 years as a loyal customer, it took only 26 hours for you to lose this client. You chose to push your political ideology by cancelling Sean Hannity (Fox) ads, while supporting Racheal Maddow — slap in the face of Veterans and USA loving conservatives,” said another.

The campaign against Hannity’s advertisers followed a similar, successful campaign against former Fox News host Bill O’Reilly over allegations of sexual harassment. Fox News fired O’Reilly after dozens of advertisers caved to public pressure and pulled their ads from his show. The campaign to take down O’Reilly, like the campaign to take down Hannity, was led by Media Matters.

Craig said...

Company faces backlash for pulling Hannity ads

Financial services firm USAA, facing a backlash to its decision to pull advertising from Sean Hannity's show on Fox News Channel, says it is withdrawing from other opinion-based television programs.

The company, which sells insurance and other products to members of the U.S. military, veterans and their families, had cited its aversion to opinionated programming in backing away from Hannity. The veteran talk show host has become a liberal target because of his focus on a discredited story about a murdered Democratic National Committee staffer.

Yet the conservative watchdog Media Research Center noted that USAA ads had run in recent weeks on left-leaning shows hosted by Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O'Donnell and Chris Matthews on MSNBC.

The ads were placed in error and that mistake is being corrected, said Roger Wildermuth, USAA spokesman. It wasn't clear how the ads could be placed in at least four opinion-based shows in violation of the company's policy; he didn't immediately respond to a question about whether there were more.

Since the liberal advocacy group Media Matters for America posted a list of more than 150 of Hannity's advertisers earlier this week, nine companies have said they no longer wanted to be sponsors. That's only a fraction of the companies that backed out of the since-fired Bill O'Reilly's Fox show last month after news of settlements paid to women to quiet harassment claims.

USAA's decision was particularly disappointing since Hannity has supported veterans organizations, said Brent Bozell, president of the Media Research Center.

The decision provoked an angry response. A Memorial Day posting on the company's Facebook page had nearly 500 comments Friday afternoon, many from people protesting the Hannity decision and vowing to move accounts from USAA.

One woman wrote: "with one boneheaded move, you've made me start looking for a new house and auto insurance, a new bank, a new investment manager."

"It was even more intense than I expected it would be," Bozell said, "and I expected it would be intense."

USAA noted that other companies had seen a backlash from their decisions, too. Wildermuth said USAA's decision on Hannity was not the result of outside pressure.

"We will continually review our ad placements to ensure we are consistent with our policy," he said.

Anonymous said...

" ... and most of them remain in that religious delusional state of mind the rest of their lives..."

Like yourself with your New Age hogwash, you mean, Dahlheimer?

Anonymous said...

Dahlheimer, you have never answered any of Craig's refutations and rebuttals of your deluded nonsense. Why is that? I put it to you it is because your views are delusional, irrational and don't hold up to logical scrutiny.

I suggest you find a blog full of like-minded baloney such as yourself. Why not try MCE's 'Politically Unclassifiable' blogspot for starters? There your hogwash won't stand out like a sore thumb so much among all the dung there!

Craig said...

Trevor Phillips, the former Chair of Human Rights and Equality Commission, who purportedly popularized the term “Islamophobia”, said something eye-opening:

“There’s no shortage of difficult issues to tackle. But I think there’s little doubt that it’s the extremist adherents to one particular faith, Islam, who’ve created a major fault line in this country.”

Question posed by pollster to Muslims: What would you do if you thought someone close to you was getting involved in terrorism in Syria? Answer: 34% would tell the police. Only 34%.

Bottom line: The most bigoted people in the UK are Muslims. What a surprise.

Check out the rest of the results of the survey:

Survey: Most UK Muslims won't report terror plots to police

This originally aired in April 2016.

Anonymous said...

You said it @ 11:06 AM !

Anonymous said...

I'm from the UK. If we fail to intern, imprison or where necessary, deny re-entry or deport those with even just provable sympathy towards Islamist terrorism, then we owe the Germans, Italians and Japanese who resided here at the time of WWII a huge apology!

Christine Erikson (aka Justina) said...

Sunday May 28, AD 2017 will date future posts so no one wrongly thinks as two do now that I
posted twice in same week.

anon 10:44 WALID'S LIES - I refuted them in a previous post HE GOT MAD BECAUSE I CALLED HIM OUT ON MISQUOTING SCRIPTURE. so he slandered me.

I NEVER said I was ex pentecostal charismatic only ex evangelical (someone else notes his theory of John misidentifying arabic letters as greek letters for numbers is disproven by context speaks of CALCULATE numbers.) NEVER made a connection between Christ and Onan's seed. intact hymen betulah type virgin (aka technical virgin) with seed spill from heavy petting could get pregnant but not a proper young woman almah. so betulah virgin no miracle needed, almah virgin or young woman, miracle indicated. Almah is the right word.

re Seth Rich family denials - they wouldn't necessarily know if he contacted wikileaks.

"... you didn’t EXPLICITLY “back down”, though it was implicit."

I see why you misunderstood me, to me syntax and grammar are all the same. I did not back
down. writing problems in NT are because it is NOT Classical Greek but koine which is to Classical Greek as ebonics is to proper English.

Revelation has extra problems, used against it when arguing John the Apostle didn't write it (Irenaeus, student of John's student, said he did, so he did).

confusing the issue is "a literal millennium" Revelation shows NO END to Christ's rule.
the first thousand years the devil is fully bound unable to tempt ANYONE not crippled like now,
then released briefly for one last test of mankind a revolt happens and it is put down then the
general resurrection, the judgement, new heavens and new earth and descent of the New
Jerusalem (which the CHurch is a foretaste of).

I have NOT violated the once a week limit. I post on Sundays and sometimes on a later day
that is still ONE DAY IN THAT WEEK. Lack of others posting looks like less time passed.

"Clearly, you’ve backtracked to where you’d done a 360," huh? you mean I reminded you
that you started this by denying The Lamb was slain from the foundation of the world?
"then continued your attempts at obfuscation." I have not obfuscated but tried to explain in more detail but you seem more dishonest than confused. so you don't deceive others I try to correct your errors anyway.

"Where did I intimate that the Greek translated “the one who was slain” refers to the book of life?!"

BY DENYING THAT "THE ONE SLAIN" REFERS TO THE LAMB, which denial much earlier is why this discussion, YOU LEAVE NO OTHER OPTION but that the book of life was slain, and a couple of other absurdities.

Craig said...


Since you persist, let’s go back to the very first statement I made, which was addressed to paul and in reference to Dalheimer’s “god”. [This provides yet another opportunity for Dalheimer to try to defend his position/refute my assertions about his cosmology and theology.]

Yes; while Dahlheimer’s “God” has to clean up a mess made by a lesser G/god who emanated from him, the Christian God, the One True God, had a plan from the very beginning. Revelation 13:8 states:

All inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast--all whose names have not been written in the Lamb's book of life, the Lamb who was slain from the foundation of the world.

The grammar here is a little ambiguous, so it may instead be:

All inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast—all whose names have not been written from the foundation of the world in the book of life belonging to the Lamb who was slain.

Thus, it’s either that the Lamb (Jesus) was slain from the very beginning, or that the book of life belonging to the Lamb was there from the very beginning, this book of life requiring the Life-Giver, Christ. Either way amounts to the same thing. No back-up plan; it was there from the beginning. There’s no “Ooops!” like Dahlheimer’s “God”.

I’ve never stated nor intimated anything about the scroll being ‘slain’—that’s your own ridiculous misconstrual. In fact, above I implied otherwise with this @ 9:19 AM: If I were to state, “Christine, the one who would argue with wallpaper”, the part after “Christine” is descriptive, NOT a repeating of “Christine”. Hence [similarly] “the Lamb” is not repeated in the Greek text.

Yes, all the NT is written in Koine Greek. But, let’s not obfuscate [again], I didn’t confuse what you wrote. Sure, “syntax” and “grammar” can be synonymous; I’ve even used them that way. The issue here is your attempted rebuttal of my initial statement above, not Koine vs. Classical Greek. As I noted, syntactical ambiguity is found throughout the NT, including the Gospel of John. I stand by my comment above @ 7:50 / 7:52 AM, and the follow-up @ 9:19 AM, which point out your flip-flop on the issue of syntax/grammar: In reference to my very first comment above, you said “not grammar ambiguity” [previous thread @ 1:14 AM], then in subsequent comments you appealed to the “syntax ambiguity” inherent in Revelation [previous thread 1:18 AM].

Now, show me and everyone here where I, in your words, was “DENYING THAT ‘THE ONE SLAIN’ REFERS TO THE LAMB”. Point to the specific comment by thread and time. Well, ya can’t, because I didn’t.

Anonymous said...

European leaders begin to openly despise the United States. Is this the ten kings hating the whore of Babylon?

Anonymous said...

The United Kingdom doesn't despise the United States. We stand with you, despite our unfortunate geographical location!

Yes, they despise us en masse yet how quickly they forget that were it not for our two countries and the British Commonwealth countries, continental Europe would be under the yoke of the Germans or Russians now!

Craig said...

Anon 11:27 AM,

Which 10 of the 28 current EU member states? I don’t think the Eastern bloc is against Trump/USA, at least not vocally. Poland certainly isn’t (see my post @ 4:53 PM). If you take the top ten by population, with UK’s ‘Brexit’ I don’t think you can make a case, and I’d think Greece would not be in opposition.

Anon 1:13 PM (yesterday),

Same here in the USA! In fact, we DO owe them an apology, just based on the following. Back in May 2010, upon questioning by David Horowitz, a student would not deny her support for Hamas. But note what she DID affirm:

Partial transcript:

DAVID HOROWITZ, FRONTPAGEMAGAZINE.COM: Will you condemn Hamas here and now?


HOROWITZ: Will you condemn Hamas?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Would I condemn Hamas?

HOROWITZ: As a terrorist — genocide —

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Are you asking me to put myself on a cross? If I say something I'm sure that I will be arrested. For reasons of Homeland Security, so if you could please just answer my questions?

HOROWITZ: If you condemn Hamas — Homeland Security will arrest you?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: If I support Hamas. Because your question forces me to condemn Hamas, if I support Hamas, I look really bad.

HOROWITZ: But if you don't condemn Hamas obviously, you support it, case closed.

I'm a Jew. The head of Hezbollah has said that he hopes that we will gather in Israel so he doesn't have to hunt us down globally. For it or against it?


Anon 12:53 PM,

AMEN!! How quickly they forget.

Anonymous said...

Merkel: Europe Can No Longer Rely on the US and UK

Craig said...

Carbon taxes coming to Canada this Fall: Ezra Levant: Trudeau using carbon tax to punish Conservative provinces: Ezra Levant of explains why northern territories may be exempt from Trudeau's carbon tax, but not, say, Saskatchewan.

See also (Rebel Media): Politicized science evident in field of climate study: Holly Nicholas refutes the commonly accepted idea that STEM subjects are free of the kind of political correctness that shuts down debate on contentious subjects. Features talk by Dr. Judith Curry.

Anonymous said...

You sure make good use of a Sunday, don't ya, Chritine?

Thank goodness her blots on the blog are marginalized. She continues to bog down in the same arguments for what? Weeks now?
Boring as ever, still unapologetic and unresolved though she has been directly, correctly challenged, and then drags her fight with Shoebat here on top that.
The other posters are either interesting, at least current, on topic, and/or helpful in their information.

Imagine how this blog would look right now if Constance had not banished her to once a week!
She ought to be banished period, just like she is at other sites.
Her weekly upchuck is unhelpful, unnecessary rubbish.

Anonymous said...

I couldn't have put it more succinctly myself @ 4:39PM. Spot on!

If I had to choose between Walid Shoebat's version of events about his and MCE's interactions with each other on his blog, or MCE's twisted and hashed version of them, I'd choose his hands down (even though I don't agree with him on everything) every time!

She really is a bore who can't accept being wrong on anything, though she is (generously speaking) seldom right on anything! She should change her profile name to Tedium Ad Nauseam (Aka Old and Irritating Bore)!

Craig said...

There’s a youth nationalist movement in Europe extending over states' boundaries, in opposition to Islamisation and cultural Marxism. This first video is just self-promotion: Defend Europe United Identitäre Bewegung Identity Identitaria Identitete Identitaire Identitarian

Some have charged the group with neo-nazism, but I don’t think that’s accurate. The individuals in this group just wish to retain the culture they enjoy and have built. While there may well be neo-nazis in their midst, that shouldn’t obscure what I see as their goals.

This Dateline story tries too hard to paint them as neo-nazis, in my estimation. However, it does provide a fairly good overview of the group: Europe's Right-Wing Youth Activists are Striking Back Against Multi-Culturalism

Lauren Southern covered the French contingent of the group: Generation Identity: Europe's Youth Reconquista

Craig said...

After spending the past year or so, off and on, researching associated ideas contained in this video, I have to agree with its major thrust. A warning is in order regarding some of the language, though it’s not that bad. The vlogger is very direct at times, but, I think it necessary to get the points across.


Please watch the entire video, you may miss the gist if you don't. ***The title is controversial only if you don't watch the whole of the video.***

Western men have given Western women freedom of will and choice in their society.
…and Western women are now choosing who will take it away from them.

The bottom line is feminism is at fault for the impending destruction of the West—a destruction of Biblical proportions. And men have allowed it. Sexual revolution is the biggee. Just look at the sexual prohibitions in Leviticus 18 and see how these are being practiced today by men and women, and then see the associated consequences in the final seven verses.

I deem the above video the secular answer to corresponding Biblical truth. Going further than this video’s contents, I’ve never agreed that fascism is necessarily a ‘right wing’ thing. Clearly, the so-called “antifa” are the real fascists the left vs. Trump and his supporters was; and, arguably, (radical) Islam is fascist. If one cannot see that, by and large, the mass immigration in Europe has resulted in non-assimilation, I think said individual is blinded. Islam is, at base, theocratic, and their position is ‘my way or the highway’, so, to expect assimilation is fantasy.

Here’s a thought-provoking blog on this subject: Can Islam move away from theocracy?. As I’d intimated above, be sure to check out the comments section:

Terrorism is a distraction. It’s a distraction from the big question of our day, about Islam and violence. Only a tiny minority of Muslims affirm that sort of violence. A far larger proportion of Muslims condone another, vaguer sort of violence. It is this that we must confront.

I mean the violence of theocracy. Theocracy is the belief that one religion should be absolutely culturally dominant. Of course it thinks that the state should enforce this; if the state fails to do so it loses legitimacy. This theocratic worldview is the underlying cause of Muslim terrorism.

To judge from its founding texts, and its history, Islam is a religion that wants to be very firmly established. It wants to be the official religion of a nation, or empire. It rejects the notion that politics should be conducted without reference to religion, and it rejects the notion that various different religions should be treated equally. To be blunt, it has a very strong theocratic tendency.

Yeah, I know, ‘not all Muslims…’—read the entire article (it’s not long), then the comments.

Craig said...

Wow, I really messed up one sentence. This one should be:

Clearly, the so-called “antifa” are the real fascists in the left vs. Trump and his supporters wars...

Anonymous said...

"Comment deleted
This comment has been removed by the author.

6:19 PM"

MCE's answer to Craig, and paul, and whoevers, at 1:02 PM.

Tis nasty stuff you say against folks here that disagree with you, and successfully refuted you, as well. And you exceeded your posting limit so took it back before Constance could catch it.

Yeah, you should take it back.....and apologize too, Christine.

How on earth do you stand yourself, Ms Erikson?

Anonymous said...

Yes,11:15, that's a favorite of hers... playing now you see it / now you don't! She'd actually had two posts in quick succession, so the deleted one makes her third!

It reminds me when Ray B and others pulled her up for posting some New Agey ad for her "Resident Seer", she quickly deleted that post too, no doubt once she realised her error posting it here.

Anonymous said...

MCE deletes her extra posts thinking people would not notice.
Well we have.

Craig said...

Lauren Southern’s presentation at Cal Poly: Return of the Traditional Woman - Cal Poly SLO. Very well done!

Craig said...

‘Rise from your knees!’ Poland’s PM destroys EU … we won’t be blackmailed into taking your migrants

Polish prime minister Beata Szydlo said Poland will not be “blackmailed” into accepting thousands of refugees under the EU quota system, especially after the Manchester suicide bombing that killed 22 people, including two Poles.

Szydlo slammed weak-willed EU leaders for allowing the slow death of European culture and its people by taking in millions of refugees that are destroying the Western nations financially, socially and culturally.

In a defiant speech before the Polish Parliament on Wednesday, Szydlo urged lawmakers to protect Poland and its children from the scourges of Islamist terrorism and cultural suicide:

“Where are you headed, Europe? Rise from your knees and from your lethargy, or you will be crying over your children every day.

“If you cannot see that terrorism has the potential to hurt every country in Europe, and you think that Poland should not defend itself, you are going hand in hand with those who point this weapon against Europe, against all of us.

“Do we want politicians who say we have to ‘get used to’ terrorist attacks?”

Prime Minister Beata Szydlo received a standing ovation from many members of the Polish parliament, who expressed their approval of her no-nonsense call to action.

Check out the map showing terror attacks in Europe—none in Poland, and they want to keep it that way!

Szydlo’s government is currently battling the Brussels-based European Union over taking in a quota of refugees (mostly from Muslim nations in the Middle East and North Africa) after her predecessor in 2015 agreed to take 4,500 to 5,000 migrants.

The EU then raised that quota to 6,200, but Szydlo’s administration has refused, saying it will instead provide financial aid to refugee camps in the Middle East. Hungary has taken a similar stance against the forced refugee quotas.

The European Union has since threatened sanctions against Poland if it doesn’t accept the refugees by June, Radio Poland reported. But prime minister Szydlo said Poland will not be “blackmailed.”

It’s unclear what the sanctions would be, but Szydlo said she’d prefer any sanction over taking in hordes of refugees, especially if they refuse to assimilate or pose a terrorist threat. “This needs to be said clearly and directly: This is an attack on Europe, on our culture, on our traditions,” she said.

Since Europe began taking in millions of refugees (mostly Muslims from Arab nations) during the past 20 years, some parts of the Western countries have started to resemble the Middle East.

Meanwhile, the wealthy Arab nations of the Persian Gulf — Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Bahrain, Iraq, Oman and Qatar — have done little to help their Muslim brethren.

Craig said...

Here’s an article by Richard Spencer of Jihad Watch. You’d think the title says it all, but…: UK police helicopter swoops in on garden party: song mocking bin Laden was played

“It just seems a bit extreme to have ten police officers and helicopter attend over a song which is approved by YouTube which we never actually put on. It came on by the shuffle list, and now being investigated as a racial offence, the only person who took offence was the female police officer and its [sic] not even a racist song.”

A bit extreme? It’s an outrage, and a sign of the catastrophic deterioration of modern Britain.

In the video, the man says: “Our own protectors are turning against us. Because the people that are bloody tellin’ them the rules ‘ave got it all wrong, THERESA MAY.”

Ain’t that the truth.

Remember when we were told that bin Laden was not a true Muslim and his acts had nothing to do with Islam? So do I. But now insulting him in the UK is a crime, because it incites “racial hatred” against Muslims, even though Muslims are not of a single race and Islam is not a race.

This is institutionalized insanity.


Following is an excellent comment accompanying the piece:

…What we face today is an international conspiracy of influence to turn the world into one huge common reservoir of incompetence controlled by a group of elites. Some like Soros have that obvious intentional goal. Some like Gates and Zuckerberg are amateurs being influenced by more sinister nation-destroyers.

It’s worth the time to read Zuckerberg’s Harvard commencement speech to discover that he is anti-nationalist, anti-patriotic, and wants to foster globalism along with the other corporate-world seditionists.

This is what we are actually facing – nation-killing sedition – from leftists, universities, corporations, and Islam whose separate goals coalesce upon sedition like streams joining into a mighty river. They are foolishly destroying belief in the values of their native countries; rewriting history to demean their nation, selling out laborers, taking far more than they contribute, turning people into commodities, nibbling away freedom for the masses, and inviting seditionist immigrants who will not integrate.

Islam is like a gaping monster with its jaws open to devour the remains of our moral-less menagerie.

There has never been such a grand confluence set upon the destruction of our Western nations. We will either fight back and reclaim our nations and their sovereignty or be reduced to work units in a global, nationless, structure of bondage under some successor of the UN.

Thomas Ivan Dahlheimer said...

The following excerpts are from an article located at

The "new age" is a movement that became popular in the West in the 1960s and 1970s. At that time, it carried a clear Eastern pedigree, drawing from Hindu mysticism and Western occult teachings that appealed to the idealist counterculture then in the ascendancy.

Recently, decades after its blossoming in the West and 8,000 miles away, the "New Age" has surfaced in India in the form of popular books, magazines and products. But in the process, someone forgot to tell the Indian journalists (who were writing for Hindu readers) that the "New Age" isn't supposed to be overtly Hindu. But this lapse has not stalled its popularity. Hinduism Today dispatched its correspondents to investigate the nature of India's New Age mystical, cultural phenomenon which journeyed India to the West and back to India again.

In December, 1987, the New Age made the cover of Time magazine with a photo of actress Shirley MacLaine, holding a cluster of crystals. ... Bestselling authors, like Eckhart Tolle and Deepak Chopra, skillfully repackaged Hindu and Eastern religious concepts for their Western audiences. ... New Age ideas had entered the mainstream.

Anonymous said...

Dahlheimer, why don't you answer Craig's refutations and rebuttals of your former posts regarding your New Age delusions? Not up to the challenge? I thought not!

I redirect you to , where you'll find a lot in common, such as chakras, kundalini,"Resident Seers", orange ether blobs, ufology, psychic vampirism, and all sorts of gnostic and New Agey nonsense you can no doubt relate to!

Craig said...

Watch this heart wrenching video: Colorado Women of Influence 2016 Woman of Vision: Catherine St. Germain (Woman of Courage Winner). This woman married a man—seemingly her dream guy—only to find that he subsequently raped her then-15 year old daughter. Or did he? Have sympathy, get mad…then see this:

It's A Mad World

Aaron [Scott] was accused by his stepdaughter after he took away her cell phone because she continued to seek "hook ups" with older men online. This evidence was barred from trial. One of the step daughter's schoolmates offered evidence that the stepdaughter bragged she was going to get rid of Aaron from their lives and that evidence was barred from trial. Prior to Aaron sharing a home with his stepdaughter, her adoptive father used to sleep outside her bedroom door to keep her from sneaking out to meet with older men she'd met on the internet. The step daughter was a subject in a sex crimes sting operation prior to events. None of this background would have been allowed in court.

What would be allowed in court is that the stepdaughter texted a friend claiming that Aaron touched her inappropriately then went to police the next day. Prior consistent statements are hearsay. Catherine St Germain made claims that DNA corroborated her daughter's evidence but it did not. There were no accusations of rape and no dna was found on her daughter's body. There was DNA skin cells found on the outside of clothing in the home- which would be true of anyone sharing the home. Nevertheless, the "DNA" was made to sound like semen and evidence that a rape happened.

None of Aaron's ex-wives believe these stories because they know him. Nevertheless, Aaron is prevented from seeing his other children because Cat St Germain interfered with his plea bargain. Aaron only pled guilty because his defence lawyer told him that he'd probably be found guilty due to his evidence being blocked in court. When he made the bargain he was not supposed to have any jail sentence and not supposed to be on a sex offender registry for the rest of his life. When he got to court the sentencing was changed.

Talk about being RAILROADED!

Diana Davison is cofounder of the Lighthouse Project, an organization in Canada (where this stuff is rampant) dedicated to defending and freeing men falsely accused of rape. Her YouTube channel, Feminism LOL (now Feminism KEK), is dedicated to exposing the evils of feminism. As a lesbian, she well-knows feminism. Wrongfully accused men are fortunate to have an organization such as this to help them.

Anonymous said...

"New Age ideas had entered the mainstream."

Duh...Mr. Dullheimer.
Of course it has. The Bible warned us in the last days that error will become rampant in the apostate age, this rightly called age of deception.

So be as wrong as you like, for you have lots of company. But it will cost you....
And still, you cannot seem to muster answers to direct questions that support the logic of your new age/old pagan view of the world. Just because something was or is does not make it the truth. Your beliefs won't last past time on earth. Will die with it so that leaves those without the truth, exiting this life without a sustainable Eternal Life Insurance Plan. Only God through His Son Jesus Christ offers that. And time is running out for this world because it will burn up...all of it..that day has an appointment to keep. My suggestion to you is actually read what the Bibles says before you pick it apart and find this truth that, either one may trust in Him who holds those great and exceeding promises of 2 Peter 1:3,4 or experience the great and excessive heat to happen as warned in 2 Peter 3:3-14.

Surely you aren't so dull you cannot objectively read for yourself and then make your points to support your positions. But whatever. Afraid you may find yourself being exactly what the Bible calls those who refuse to take a good deep enough and honest enough look?....The Bible says those refusing that are willfully ignorant of the truth.

Craig said...

Where do kids get the idea that they can exact revenge on a parent or step-parent in this sort of fashion (@ 2:00 PM above)? Apparently, it starts early. In men's rights activist Helen Smith, Phd's book Men on Strike she records a lot of empirical data based on conversations with men. She also recorded some thoughts written by men from a parent’s site called Parent Dish. Here are two accounts:

I as a male am afraid to be around little children, I have one on the way, but up until not I have been without kids and I will be 31 this year. Just recently at a family function on my wife’s side, her stepmom invited some of her family to the function and I was SHOCKED when one of the little girls that been clinging to me all day came up to me and said “My mom said I can’t play with you any more cause she doesn’t know what you’ll do to me.” I took this very hard because for one, I love kids, and for some reason they love me. I am a volunteer firefighter and always the first one to sign up to do safety talks with the kids and just this one instance set me back a TON…

Here’s another:

I used to coach girls’ soccer with my fiancée (now wife). I stopped because one of the girls (all of 8 years old) said:

I don’t have to listen to you. I can get you in trouble just by telling people you touched me.”

Now that I have a child of my own, I have no idea how I’m going to be involved when he wants to do sports or other activities.

I already got odd looks on the playground the year I was a stay-at-home dad and carting him around with me all the time.

I personally can relate to both of these. Many years ago I briefly coached kids (4-5 years) soccer. I’d never even consider this today (and haven’t in the past 20 years). It’s just not worth the risk.

I don’t recall the details, but there was a recent trial in which a man was accused of sexually abusing his daughter—not step-daughter, but daughter. At one point when the daughter was providing testimony, the defense attorney thought her verbiage a bit odd, too advanced given her age. He asked for a recess, received it, then quickly read portions of the book Fifty Shades of Grey during the recess. There was that peculiar verbiage, almost verbatim! The father was not convicted, thanks to the quick-thinking attorney.

Susanna said...

Craig 7:20 AM,

In Michael Savage's book TRUMP'S WAR, Savage devotes a section of his book to comparing the deliberately orchestrated, government-sanctioned invasion of refugees to ancient mass population changes such as the one mentioned in the Bible where the Babylonians displaced the populations of countries they conquered by deporting the native population and replacing them with people from other conquered countries.

You may be familiar with the Babylonian exile story in the Old Testament. After Nebuchadnezzar conquered Jerusalem for the Babylonians, he marched most of the population off to the Babylonian homeland. According to the biblical account, the Jews were later allowed to return to Jerusalem and rebuild Solomon's Temple.

What you may not know is that mass deportations like this were fairly routine in the ancient world. It didn't just happen to the Jews; it happened to most conquered peoples. Not only would conquering emperors march the existing population out of the conquered territory, but they would march populations from a different conquered territory in. There were many reasons for this, but one is intuitive. By separating conquered peoples from their homelands, they were easier to control.

Not only are people with long ties to the land they reside in more willing to defend it against enemies; they are more resistant to centralized control by a distant capital. They build up long-standing legal and cultural traditions that form the basis for local self-government.

This is the argument Thomas Jefferson made in his SUMMARY VIEW OF THE RIGHTS OF BRITISH AMERICA against taxation and legislation by the British Parliament. He didn't merely say the colonists rejected Parliament's legislation because the colonists weren't represented. He also said they didn't want to be represented in Parliament; that, in fact they could NEVER be represented in Parliament. That's because their long-standing tradition of legislation by their own local assemblies was the basis of their liberty.

Only a blind man could fail to see the parallel to what governments all over the West are doing now and what ancient conquering emperors did. By importing mass populations from alien hostile cultures and deliberately planting them throughout their countries, Western nations are fundamentally changing the existing populations. Allowed to continue, the populations of Europe and the United States will no longer be the same peoples who have existed there for hundreds or thousands of years and who built long-standing traditions of liberty and local self-government.

.....This has nothing to do with race. It has to do with culture.....

...The populations and culture of the West are being artificially and fundamentally changed. It seems awfully coincidental that the new populations would be less likely to resist the borderless, globalist new world order where international boards of UNELECTED bureaucrats regulate the political and economic lives of everyone on the planet.....
TRUMP'S WAR by Michael Savage pp. 70-72

It is not to be forgotten that the culture of the West which is in danger of being fundamentally changed by modern day Nebuchadnezzars such as the ones in Brussels - or even the ones in Washington D.C. - is the Judeo-Christian culture.

Poland already knows what it is like to be invaded, divided and occupied by both the German Nazis under Hitler and the Soviet Communists under Stalin. Few people are aware that just sixteen days after Hitler invaded Poland from the West, Stalin invaded Poland from the East.

Moreover, both Hitler and Stalin persecuted the Jews and to a lesser extent the Christians in their territories.....sometimes using Islamists as their surrogates.

Craig said...


Thanks for your comment. I’d say Savage’s comments are quite astute. I was not aware that Poland was invited by the two aggressors simultaneously. Hopefully, Poland will ‘stick to its guns’, so to speak. And, hopefully that youth group I’d referenced above will gain more traction.

Craig said...

'invited' should be invaded

Marko said...


I have always thought that Poland was a true ally of the West. Poland, and probably the Baltics, and Western Ukraine, with a backward, evil Belarus in their midst.

Here's a pretty sobering assessment of our current situation in America:

It only highlights what I start and/or end many conversations with: There is no political solution. Only Jesus Christ is victorious over the darkness, and to Him we must cling.

Craig said...


That's a pretty hard-hitting article. I think he's about right.

Relatedly, I found a video of a Russian defector, explaining the objectives of the KGB and how effective they were. I'll post it in the new thread.

Ascah said...

Following is an excellent comment

Ben said...

About the Cyber Attack, some people are too eager to use their talent for the bad of the society. I wonder what motivates them.

hellen said...

thanks alot for sharing. very informative

Anonymous said...

happy kiss day quotes for wife
cute hug day card messages for girlfriend
sweet messages for proposes day
valentine day image for whatsapp