Sunday, December 24, 2017
MERRY CHRISTMAS - 2017
Puerto Rico is suffering. So are Californians through massive fires; Texans still recovering from hurricanes and earthquakes, Floridians ditto. Now yesterday, the Philippines suffered tremendous disasters. Our prayers and support need to be with them.
We are having a quiet family celebration at home. I wish the same for you and your loved ones through this Christmas season and the realities of the fast approaching New Year of 2018.
Jesus Jesus, _so lowly meek and mild
New life, new hope, new joy you bring
Won't you listen to the angels sing
Glory glory glory to the new born king
"For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulder:
and his name shall be called Wonderful, Councillor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace." (Isaiah9:6)
Fantastic performance of Handel's Messiah by the London Symphony Orchestra & Chorus, conducted by Sir Colin Davis. This was Davis' last appearance as music director for the LSO ... and he made the choice himself to conduct "Messiah."
Enjoy this great performance that brings honor and glory to the Lord Jesus Christ!
Note carefully the references to "sectarianism" and "religious fundamentalism"
'It's beyond detestable. It's actually radical evil'
“Spirit cooking.” Occult imagery outside meetings of the most powerful people in the world. Bizarre rituals held at globally important events.
Dave tn CA
To see what Javier Solana and Mary Kaldor....
Thanks for the timely paper!
Remember, back in 2003, Javier Solana, always the anti-clerical, claimed the USA was "too religiously driven" and thinking in "binary terms".
I read the article. A few excerpts from the article, along with a comment of mine, are presented below.
"What is going on? What perverted ideology animates those who control our global destiny?"
"Global insider Theodore Roosevelt Malloch, who has worked at the highest levels on Wall Street, at the United Nations, at elite universities like Yale and Oxford and served on the executive board of the World Economic Forum, has a disturbing answer. It’s 'Luciferianism.' And Malloch described the ideology and its influence on world leaders in a recent interview on Infowars."
Malloch said: "Luciferianism is a belief system that venerates the essential characteristics that are affixed to Lucifer,” he explained. “That tradition has been informed by Gnosticism, by Satanism [NOT SO], and it usually [actually always] refers to Lucifer not as ‘the devil’ per se but as some kind of liberator [who is Jesus Christ], some kind of guardian [who is Jesus Christ], some kind of guiding spirit [who is Jesus Christ]. In fact, as the true god as opposed to Jehovah [this statement is not true].” Gnostic "Christians" believe that Lucifer is Jesus Christ and that Jehovah is the Old Testament god, a different god than Jesus' heavenly Father. Gnostic Christians worship Jesus Christ and His heavenly Father.
The economic boom in this country is not the boom people think. Boom and bust in the forecast, both real and imagined (how convenient).
The power play on the world stage between those who want sovereignty and those pushing global control are going to go to the mat on this soon.
The real and fake will be exposed more and more on the religious front and fully and finally playing out on American shores also (that ball has been rolling steadily and faster since the Pope's visit in 2015). Real persecution is coming to real Christians (has nothing to do with denomination) so only what (really who) is true will be targeted, the fake have no worries because they belong to this world. The true are the pilgrims and sojourners, and the way it has always been, as the Word of God has always depicted.
Look for people to be turned wrong side out, more than ever, wrestling with all these issues, individuals and families, cities and towns, states and nations.
None of these big ticket items are going away, but manifesting instead.
Most definitely eventful.
Fun little video that illustrates why the main stream pundits and politicians can't be trusted. One by one, watch these people predict with absolute certainty that "Donald Trump will NEVER be President."
Black Ops Contractor Reveals CIA Blew Up OKC Building-HOURS Later He's in a Near Fatal Collision!
The top 20 fears and anxieties that millennials in 2017 have are:
Having to wait in the house all day for a delivery because the delivery man did not specifically say what time he would arrive
Forgetting log-in passwords
Leaving your phone at home
No free WiFi at the hotel
The buffering sign when you are streaming something online
Standing in public transport
Running for the bus/train only to have the doors close on your face
Forgetting your umbrella and then finding out it’s raining
Having to get out of bed to turn off the lights
Finding an empty bottle in the fridge that was put there by a lazy roommate
Being unable to find the TV remote just as your favorite show is starting
Being “seen-zoned”: when a friend sees your message but doesn’t bother to reply
Having to put on pants just to open the door
When an avocado isn’t ripe enough
Not having enough hangers that you reach the point where you pile your clothes on one hanger
Running out of toilet paper
When restaurant crew people don’t bring condiments with your food and you have to ask them for some
Your laptop is low on battery but your charger is in another room
Realizing the milk has run out after boiling the kettle
Sat Nav re-routing
Compare this to the top problems of people in the 1990s, which include:
1) finding “the one”;
2) not earning enough to pay the bills;
3) not having enough money to go on a holiday;
4) saving for your first home...
Published: December 27, 2017
SOURCE: CAITLIN JOHNSTONE | MEDIUM
The editorial board of the Washington Post, whose sole owner is a CIA contractor, has published a predictably fact-challenged op-ed arguing that congress must reauthorize the Orwellian surveillance program known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which is deliberately used to collect communications of US citizens.
WaPo, which to this day continues to violate universal journalistic protocol by refusing to disclose its $600 million conflict of interest when reporting on the US intelligence community, just so happens to once again find itself in full agreement with that same US intelligence community...
Merry Christmas to all and a Happy, Healthy New Year!
And the very same to you Susanna. Was thinking today it would be nice to see your name pop up here again..and here you are!
North Korean Soldier Who Defected Was IMMUNE TO ANTHRAX
Alarming Story Out Of SKorea Confirms Experts Worst Fears And Shows How War Could Bring America To A Standstill In DAYS!
"BUSTED: Unearthed Video from Chicago Church Shows Barack Obama Making Fun of the Bible, Mocking Jesus
"After all the years of posturing, the video finally helps reveal the truth.
"No one in their right mind would call Barack Obama a Christian after this radical and twisted translation of the Bible.
"And Jesus’ life."
I've been hearing/reading quite a bit about "Q Anon" lately. From what I gather, this is insider intelligence that is being shared by patriots inside the Fed. Government. I downloaded "The Book of Q" and it gives some very interesting insight as to the battle being waged against MASSIVE corruption on BOTH sides of aisle. It is claimed in "Q" that many of the key people in Government are Satan worshipers ... very evil people. "Q" also claims that the damn is about to break on these people and that their efforts to remove Trump is doomed to failure.
Anyways, here is a download of the "Book of Q" PDF. Check out also this topic on youtube, if interested ...
President Trump has delivered on a number of promises for his base. But there was an impressive amount of breakage along the way. You might say he President Trump did as much demolition as he did construction. The press is doing a good job of telling us what he accomplished in 2017. But they keep leaving out all the stuff he broke that probably needed to be broken. I’ll fix that for you here:
GOP – Trump broke the GOP and reconstructed it along his terms, successfully it seems.
DNC – The DNC has no charismatic leader, no game plan, and little money.
Clinton Dynasty – Done
Bush Dynasty – Done
Mainstream Media – The public learned that news coverage is based on bias as much as fact.
NFL – Ratings down, attendance down.
FBI (leadership) – The FBI as a whole is still highly credible, but the leadership is not.
Pundits – Nearly all the pundits were wrong about Trump’s nomination, election, and successful (by Republican standards) first year.
Government Regulations – For good or bad, we have fewer regulations now.
Hollywood – Big stars are alienating 40% of their potential audience whenever they take time off from groping.
North Korea – They used to have a pathetic but functioning economy. That situation is changing rapidly.
ISIS – Remember ISIS? They used to be a big deal.
TPP – Pulled out
Paris Climate Accord – Pulled out
Reality – I told you in 2015 that candidate Trump would change more than politics. I told you he would change the way we saw reality. Do you remember when you thought the news reported facts? You probably don’t think that anymore.
I’m probably leaving out some stuff that got broken. It’s been a busy year.
Interesting "Natural News" site ... thanks for the link.
I could probably write a book re: my own personal experience. Briefly, even though I was considered fit and athletic, and THOUGHT I was eating healthy food, I developed a very serious, life threatening heart condition. Around 8 years ago, my wife and I made the commitment to a plant based vegan diet and began a more consistent exercise program. The result? Lowered our blood pressure to that of a marathon runner, lowered body mass by 12 - 14%, and virtually reversed my "serious heart condition" ... all without any medication whatsoever.
Billions of dollars are being made as a result of a vicious circle of unhealthy lifestyles, diet, trips to the Dr. who then prescribes expensive medicine that doesn't "cure" anything. The root cause of the illness is seldom, if ever, addressed. Prevention is the key to healthcare, but it won't be emphasized because there is no money in it.
PS: the diet & exercise plan that I followed was developed by Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn (formerly of the Cleveland Clinic). He and his son also produced the documentary "Forks Over Knives." Dr. Esselstyn's lectures can be found on Youtube.
We need you, young lady, so PLEASE make sure YOUR diet is as health-giving to YOU as RayB's is to HIM!
Why Are Accused Sexual Harassers Overwhelmingly on the Left?
How to Know When You Are Talking to a Psychopath:
DHS Announces Program to ILLEGALLY Scan Our Faces-And They're Forcing Us to Pay For It
Thousands VANISH in China as totalitarian far-left police state goes into overdrive (don’t let this happen in YOUR country)!
WATCH: Man Yells At Cops So They Pepper Spray Him To DEATH & Cover It Up!
Charities Are Having A Record December!
I've been hearing/reading quite a bit about "Q Anon" lately.
Hi RayB, since you wrote this I have been looking at it.
I am beginning to think that this may be 'We Are Anonymous'?
Thinking that Anonymous is looking to regain or expand on what little credibility they might have.
They use the same style cryptic speak.
I am glad you brought it to our attention as it is worth looking at as a data point of sorts.
Here is Q's Twitter Account?
Q speaks of MI military Intelligence as the good guys?
In our duplicitous country there seem to be only two options, Marxist Communists or Fascist Socialism, the latter of which I believe MI may be wrapped up in.
"QAnon Video Analysis and Help Primer on following Q yourself."
It's their oppressive LEADERS that are the problem (hopefully they can throw them out now).
I just deleted several Arabic language posts to this blog. I didn't do it out of antipathy for the Arabic language. I consider that a beautiful language and even know a smattering of it myself; I deleted it because they were commercials for cleaning products and water removal in Haiti. I don't know who placed them here or for what motive, but when I see commercials posted to my blogspot, I do delete them. If your language is Arabic and that is how you are most comfortable posting, you are welcome to do so; HOWEVER, I will check them for content and if it is for promotion of commercial products I will most probably delete. Some of my nicest clients as a lawyer over the years in the Detroit area have been and some still are Arabic.
January 1, 2018 by Jim Hoft
More blood on the hands of Barack Obama:
In 2009 tens of thousands of brave Iranian democracy protesters rose up against the brutal Khamenei regime after President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was announced the winner in a disputed national election.
The protests quickly turned bloody when Iranian hardliners started firing on the protesters.
One beautiful young protester was shot in the neck by the regime.
Her name was Neda Soltani or Neda Agha Soltan — she was shot in the neck during a protest in Tehran on June 20, 2009. (AFP)
But Obama did nothing.
After several days the protesters called out to President Obama, “Obama, Obama, Are you with the regime or with us?”
But Obama never showed up.
He had other plans.
I'm going to try to add it as a link to my site.
Is President Trump slowly leaking a steady trickle of information (and clues) to the mainstream news media's brainwashed masses (who are not yet 'awake')???
"Study: Earth Has A ‘Natural Thermostat’ To Regulate Climate During Extreme Temperature Swings
"The latest study proved...when the planet experiences major cold spells, weathering slows and the 'natural thermostat' allows the world to warm back up.
“'This is the process that has allowed life to survive on Earth for around 4 billion years,' says Pogge von Strandman."
From bed bugs to migrants washing their ••••s in the sinks.
The West Can Help Iranians Take Back Their Country!
The West Can Help Iranians Take Back Their Country!
YouTube is a Sewer Pipe of Total Degeneracy - Helps video of idiot celebrity laughing at suicide victim go viral...
Former first daughter joyous over discussion with Satanic organization
Boy, 10, founds drag club for KIDS...
EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Ex-Wife of 'Feminist' HuffPost Writer Says He Beat Her In Front of Their Baby!
•Do you remember when candidate Trump told us (in effect) that he would be the first non-politician to win the presidency? It seemed impossible to even imagine such a thing. Then he did the impossible.
•Do you remember when it was common wisdom that if the U.S. recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel it would be a huge problem? President Trump did it anyway. So far, it looks like a minor problem at most.
•Do you remember when experts said President Trump shouldn’t mess with the Iran nuclear deal because it could cause a huge problem for the United States and its allies? He did it anyway, and it is likely a supporting variable for the Iranian protestors who don’t like how their government is creating problems that don’t need to be problems.
•Do you remember when experts said China will never help squeeze the economy of North Korea because China fears a refugee crisis? President Trump encouraged China to squeeze anyway. Then he helpfully provided satellite photos of tankers cheating on the high seas. After South Korea grabbed and held a second cheating tanker, the economics of smuggling oil have turned negative, or will soon. And North Korea is sounding — at least to my ears — more flexible than ever. That branch is stronger than you imagined.
•Do you remember when it was common wisdom that we couldn’t put enough pressure on Pakistan to make them stop harboring terrorists because Pakistan is also an ally in many ways? President Trump just cut off their funding and put them on notice.
•Do you remember when experts said withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord would be a catastrophe? President Trump did it anyway because he didn’t like the deal. I’ve seen no indication that exiting the deal made the climate worse. Here I’m only talking about the quality of the Accord and what little impact it would have had in the best case scenario.
•The big wildcard in our many “impossibles” has to do with the tax bill and the deficit. Experts say it is impossible to get enough growth from the tax bill to pay for the deficit. But the experts are blind to the persuasion of it all. If President Trump persuades the economy higher, let’s say to 5-6% GDP, there’s a good chance he will accomplish the impossible once again and pay for those tax cuts. The tax cuts alone won’t get us to that GDP, but as part of a larger package of persuasion-by-optimism, it is strong sauce.
•The meta-impact of President Trump routinely doing the “impossible” is that it changes how all of us view our world. If Trump can keep doing the impossible, time and time again, why can’t we?
•Sometimes things are literally impossible. But much of the time we are only limited by our imaginations. Many of us simply couldn’t imagine that a number of the things President Trump has done would work out well. These were not simple surprises; these were failures of our imagination.
•In 2015 I told you that candidate Trump would change far more than politics. I said he would change how we understand reality itself. And one of those biggest changes is in the scope of our imaginations. One year ago it was hard for me to imagine Saudi Arabia taking a sudden turn toward modernization. One year ago it was hard for me to imagine an uprising in Iran that could reshape its destiny. I assume it was hard for the Iranian public to imagine it as well. But they sure are imagining it now.
•President Trump isn’t the only variable in the world. But he does create a pattern in our minds of making the impossible seem achievable. Don’t underestimate the impact that pattern has on the imaginations of everyone watching.
•And don’t be surprised if 2018 is the year when people all over the world shed their mental prisons and take on the “impossibles” in ways we have never seen. Thanks to President Trump, people everywhere are beginning to recognize the difference between real impossibilities and simple failures of imagination.
•Welcome to The Golden Age. It starts now.
I find it more than just curious that you would require Susanna's take on the books recommended to you. Why not just read them for yourself and judge them on their merits?
I've read several of Paul L. Williams' books, including "The Vatican Exposed: Money, Murder & the Mafia." Williams thoroughly documents his work and should be judged accordingly as to whether or not his findings hold merit. Personally, I have found that his works comport accurately with other factual works on various subjects regarding the financial, political and religious history of the RCC.
By the way, the books you cited go far deeper than just the "financial scandals of the Catholic Church." Williams once again proves the nefarious connections between the Vatican and criminals (the Mafia), including Italian Fascist Dictator Benito Mussolini ... all fully documented facts.
For others that may be interested, you can Google Paul L. Williams Amazon and read quite a bit of his material when you hit the "Look Inside" button. By doing so, I think you will see for yourself that this man has done his research.
You are often ABC in your opinions; maybe Susanna may be NBC in her opinions; but l have enough lawyer in me to collect evidence from as many sources as possible, evaluating it and then making up my own mind. I attempt to stay both fact and scripture based.
I'm playing with the idea of setting up a Facebook site for MY PERSPECTIVE to go with this blogspot. I have a personal Facebook page and many of you visit me there; however, I'm from a very large clan and it is often difficult to get to important information items before wading through family business. You could post your videos and photographic evidence there.
What do you think? Would it be helpful?
Are we being prepped for the final deception that will unite the world and create the despotic One World Government?
Here is a very interesting video put out by James Corbett (The Corbett Report).
Briefly, Corbett makes an intriguing case for the possibility of a faked, false flag, alien invasion. Don't laugh. The technology already exists that could pull this off.
Check it out here:
I have never been of the "ABC" camp. The camp I belong to is based upon the authority of God's Word. If that comes in conflict with the RCC, or, for that matter, any other religious body, including certain aspects of Protestantism, I will, by God's grace, side with Scriptures.
Regarding historical information, be it secular or religious in nature, I am not one easily persuaded. Once I latch onto a subject, I tend to make a study of it. My post re: Paul L. Williams reflects that same approach.
On a personal note, I have found very few people that are willing to do their own research to find the crux of a matter, particularly when it hits "close to home."
Truth will always stand the scrutiny of light, whereas, the darkness will always seek to remain hidden from the light. I believe Paul Williams' efforts are shining the light on a very secretive, dark institution that benefits greatly by remaining hidden by the cloak of darkness.
Perhaps if you put your request to verse it wouldn't be so bad:
Oh Susanna, Oh Won't You Descry For Me?
If you’re confused by the avalanche of early reports, denials, and conflicting statements about the massive security issues announced today, don’t worry — you’re far from the only one. Here’s what you need to know about Meltdown and Spectre, the two huge bugs that affect practically every computer and device out there.
What are these flaws?
Short answer: Bugs at a fundamental level that allow critical information stored deep inside computer systems to be exposed.
Security researchers released official documentation — complete with nicknames and logos — of two major flaws found in nearly all modern central processing units, or CPUs.
It’s not a physical problem with the CPUs themselves, or a plain software bug you might find in an application like Word or Chrome. It’s in between, at the level of the processors’ “architectures,” the way all the millions of transistors and logic units work together to carry out instructions.
In modern architectures, there are inviolable spaces where data passes through in raw, unencrypted form, such as inside the kernel, the most central software unit in the architecture, or in system memory carefully set aside from other applications. This data has powerful protections to prevent it from being interfered with or even observed by other processes and applications.
Meltdown and Spectre are two techniques researchers have discovered that circumvent those protections, exposing nearly any data the computer processes, such as passwords, proprietary information, or encrypted communications.
Meltdown affects Intel processors, and works by breaking through the barrier that prevents applications from accessing arbitrary locations in kernel memory. Segregating and protecting memory spaces prevents applications from accidentally interfering with one another’s data, or malicious software from being able to see and modify it at will. Meltdown makes this fundamental process fundamentally unreliable.
Spectre affects Intel, AMD, and ARM processors, broadening its reach to include mobile phones, embedded devices, and pretty much anything with a chip in it. Which, of course, is everything from thermostats to baby monitors now.
It works differently from Meltdown; Spectre essentially tricks applications into accidentally disclosing information that would normally be inaccessible, safe inside their protected memory area. This is a trickier one to pull off, but because it’s based on an established practice in multiple chip architectures, it’s going to be even trickier to fix.
Who is affected?
Short answer: Pretty much everybody...
Can you have it both ways? (Of course you can it is your blog)
On one hand you quickly denounce the Latter Rain/MSOG etc painting all people that might go to those type churches as apostate because of the god-man heresy (and I agree). But I maintain there are good Godly people in those churches......
The RCC and the Latter Rain/MSOG adapt the same eschatological set of beliefs.
Additionally the RCC maintains the same God-Man theology as seen here:
CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, SECOND EDITION
PART ONE - THE PROFESSION OF FAITH
SECTION TWO - THE PROFESSION OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH
CHAPTER TWO- I BELIEVE IN JESUS CHRIST, THE ONLY SON OF GOD
ARTICLE 3 - "HE WAS CONCEIVED BY THE POWER OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, AND BORN OF THE VIRGIN MARY"
Paragraph 1. The Son of God Became Man
I. WHY DID THE WORD BECOME FLESH?
460 The Word became flesh to make us "partakers of the divine nature":78 "For this is why the Word became man, and the Son of God became the Son of man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God."79 "For the Son of God became man so that we might become God."80 "The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods."
This segment of the catechism is "EXACTLY" what the MSOG and the Latter Rain doctrines teach. But because they are protestant they must be wrong and the RCC correct?
Are they both correct? I contend they are both wrong.
I also contend there are good godly 'people of the way' within catholic churches.
On CNN yesterday, Jake Tapper described President Trump’s recent behavior — including the President’s tweet about having a bigger nuclear “button” than North Korea — as abnormal and unstable. In other words, crazy.
One folksy definition of “crazy” is that it involves trying over and over again a solution that has never worked while hoping it works next time. President Trump is doing something closer to the opposite of that. He’s doing something new, both strategically and verbally. To be fair, new things can be crazy too. But usually only if they don’t work. When a new and unexpected thing works out well, we call it genius. And that begs the question: Is President Trump’s approach to North Korea working?
We’re seeing economic sanctions on North Korea that have the support of the UN Security Council. That part is working, and it took diplomatic skill to make it happen.
But we also see satellite images of tankers smuggling oil into North Korea. The sanctions looked as if they were not effective until South Korea detained two tankers involved in smuggling oil to North Korea. Grabbing two tankers doesn’t do much in terms of limiting supply, but it does dramatically change the perceived economics of being a smuggler. And if grabbing two tankers doesn’t get the message across, South Korea can keep detaining tankers until the economics do change. North Korea would be willing to take big risks to break the sanctions, but the shipping companies on which they depend will not. Shipping companies will only participate in wrongdoing when they are confident they won’t get caught. That calculation changed when South Korea detained two tankers.
I told you months ago that the United States was going to war with corporations that trade with North Korea. We’re seeing that with the detained tankers. Whoever owns them is bleeding cash while they sit unused. And I speculate that our intelligence services are making life difficult for other CEOs and corporations involved in violating the economic sanctions. President Trump knows he doesn’t need to stop all of the smuggling and cheating — he only needs to increase the risk until it is uneconomical for the companies involved. We’re heading in that direction.
For the first time I can recall, time is on our side with North Korea. Every passing day sees North Korea’s economy shrinking while South Korea and America thrive. We’re effectively already at war and winning hard. The longer North Korea waits to get serious about negotiating, the weaker their hand.
A recent statement out of North Korea said, in effect, that they need their nuclear weapons as a deterrent because the United States is performing war games along its border. The way I interpret North Korea’s statement is that they are getting flexible. This is the first time I’ve heard North Korea speak of their nukes as conditional on what we do. In other words, they are open to denuclearizing if we reduce their perceived military risk. They haven’t said that directly. But that’s how I read it.
North Korea recently made friendly gestures toward South Korea, offering to participate in the upcoming Olympics and opening cross-border communications for the first time in a year. The trend we are seeing is that the tougher the sanctions and rhetoric from the United States, the more flexible North Korea is becoming...
But let’s talk about President Trump’s latest tweet about North Korea. Here is the text:
“North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un just stated that the “Nuclear Button is on his desk at all times.” Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!”
Here we see President Trump “pacing” (or matching) the hyperbolic rhetoric of Kim Jung Un. The two leaders are trash-talking each other like sports rivals. But what is missed in the hysterics over wording is that President Trump and Kim Jung Un are negotiating personally, albeit in public. And I think it is safe to say both players know they are being over-the-top with their trash-talk. The odds of a nuclear miscalculation based on anything said so far is effectively zero. And if the rhetoric ratchets up to a new level of hyperbole, I would still see no additional risk. President Trump and Kim Jong Un have demonstrated they know the difference between trash-talk and action.
The Persuasion Filter says this public trash-talking probably lowers our risk of a nuclear accident. If you don’t share the kind of personality we are seeing displayed by both leaders, you might miss the biggest variable in play here. What I see is two unconventional leaders already in conversation, getting a feel for the other, and on some level enjoying the exchange. You know President Trump loves this sort of verbal battle, and he’s good at it. Now keep in mind that North Korea is a tiny country that would normally be below America’s radar. But Kim Jong Un has the full attention of the President of the United States and is trash-talking with him in public. I have to think he enjoys the verbal jousting on some level, same as President Trump.
So while it might look to many observers as two crazy leaders heading for a nuclear showdown, to me it looks like two colorful characters who probably have a weird kind of respect for each other. Let me put it another way. Which of these two situations carries a greater risk of accidental nuclear war?
Two nuclear foes who have no communication and are trying to interpret the actions of the other.
Two nuclear foes trash-talking each other (with humor) in front of the world I’ll take option two every time. When Kim Jong Un and President Trump are trash-talking in public with hyperbolic humor, they’re talking. The only risk is that one of them doesn’t understand the other is being over-the-top for effect. And I see no real risk of that. They both know what they are getting with the other.
I’d be worried if I saw Kim Jong Un yammering about the latest round of economic sanctions being an act of war. But instead he’s talking of participating in the Olympics in South Korea. That sounds like a leader who is trying to avoid war.
If you are a literal type of person who doesn’t recognize hyperbole or humor, I can see how this situation looks scary. But I promise you neither leader has a physical “button” on his desk, of any size, to launch a nuclear attack. And I feel confident that both leaders understand humor and hyperbole when they see it.
My view on all of this is that we are closer than we have ever been to a peace deal that results in a non-nuclear North Korea. Everything I see suggests President Trump is successfully “setting the table,” as he likes to say, for productive talks. Can the hundred-year plan for reunification be far away?
The test of antichrist is a denial that Jesus is THE CHRIST as in one and only Christ. Some Catholics meet that test, some don't. Some Protestants meet that test, some don't.
As for the MSOG crowd, it appears to me that their essential doctrine might be "I'm Christ, you're Christ, we're all Christ" -- the "seed corns".
Are there innocent folk caught up in it? You bet!
Try it on a CONDITIONAL, TEST Basis for X Days.
That's all that seems necessary.
If it works out well, keep it. If not, dump it.
David Horowitz’s latest book chronicles the Left’s transformation of academic institutions into doctrinal training centers.
Regarding your statement: "The test of antichrist is a denial that Jesus is THE CHRIST as in one and only Christ."
Does this test apply to the vast majority of Jewish people? Of course it does. Does that prohibit you from considering what a Jewish person might have to say on any particular subject? If a publishing house is owned by a Jewish person, does that prohibit you from reading ANY book published by them?
We live in a Christ-denying, wicked world ("the whole world lieth in wickedness"). Only God knows the intent of the human heart. Attempting to validate or repute something written based upon the secrets of the individual heart is impossible, unless of course (such as Mr. Dahlheimer) that person clearly declares what lies within.
The material presented under any venue must be judged on its own merits.
RE: Paul L. Williams' publishing company, I find nowhere that indicates that this is an "atheist" company. I would also ask you to consider the fact that the RCC is a VERY powerful entity to deal with, so much so, that mainstream publishing companies would understandably be reluctant to publish what they would perceive to be "anti-Catholic" literature. Incidentally, Paul Williams professes to be a life long Roman Catholic. The information he presents, IMO, is factual and can be verified by other historical accounts on the subjects that he has written about.
In Oregon, full-service gas stations have been the norm since 1951. Today full-service gas stations are actually mandated across the state, forbidding individuals from pumping their own gas and requiring gas station employees to serve customers. In practical terms, the left-leaning government in Oregon thinks its citizens are too stupid to pump their own fuel. Oregonians have no freedom to pump their own gas and many are so accustomed to this government mandated privilege, they openly support state government laws that restrict their individual liberty.
However, a new law signed in June of 2016 just went into effect, officially allowing residents in counties with fewer than 40,000 people the right to pump their own gas. Many whiny, privileged Oregonians are angry that the government will no longer force gas stations to give them full service in rural areas.
Once upon a time, full-service gas stations were commonplace across the U.S. Fuel station attendants would pump gas, clean windshields, and check fluid levels. As the pace of society quickened, the demand for full-service gas stations dissipated and adults began pumping their own gas. But in Oregon, the left-leaning politicians have continued to use the force of government to keep the tradition alive. For too long, Oregonians haven’t been allowed to touch gas station pumps. Now many Oregonians are having a hard time coping with the fact they will have to get out of their vehicle and pump their own gas in rural areas.
This is how a left-leaning government operates, though – treating citizens as stupid, incapable and handicapped subjects. For leftists, government power is always the solution to engineer the society they want.
A CBS affiliate in Medford, Oregon asked Oregonians what they thought about the new law, which took effect January 1, 2018. More than a thousand responses flooded into their survey expressing confusion and outrage.
Of the responses, one man retorted, “I don’t even know HOW to pump gas and I am 62, native Oregonian…..I say NO THANKS! I don’t want to smell like gasoline!” Other commenter’s said it’s safer when gas station attendants pump the fuel for you.
Oregon isn’t the only state that has handicapped its citizens when it comes to pumping gas. New Jersey motorists also face fines ranging from $50 to $250 for touching fuel pumps.
If the government can convince citizens they aren’t capable of pumping their own gas, in what other areas of life will leftist government control make people gullible, weak, and easily manipulated?
By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine
I have seen a lot of chatter on the Q-Anon and MegaAnon postings at 4chan and 8chan, and have been asked why don't we follow the goings on, the "clues," offered, and write about it. While it is true we haven't detailed their daily and weekly chatter, and won't, that does not mean we are ignoring it either. Since mid-2017, we have carefully watched, tallied the predictions, balanced the ones that came true out with those that haven't, along with those that could possibly still happen.
See, anyone can anonymously claim they are a secret Intelligence sources offering tidbits and puzzle pieces for everyone else to put together, that doesn't mean they are, but it doesn't mean they aren't either, so unless something can be confirmed, verified or debunked, we simply continue to observe, research and wait.
Some things have caught my interest, and that of author, and political commentator Jerome Corsi. Specific postings that fit in with the major news events we are witnessing, from President Trump's Executive order that could literally bring down high profile figures like the Clintons, as certain individuals names in the annex of the EO are connected in one way or another with the Clintons or the Clinton Foundation, or how that EO could apply to people like billionaire troublemaker George Soros, and other individuals. (More on that EO to catch up in a prior ANP article from December 22, 2017)
Below Corsi details some of his observations which lead him to believe another "shoe is about to drop," as he highlights his belief that all the sexual assault allegations that started with the fall of Democratic mega-donor Harvey Weinstein, are just the "tip of the iceberg" which will lead into massive crackdowns and major exposure into the rampant problem of pedophilia and child trafficking, and how that all ties in with the timing of President Trump's December 21, 2017 executive order titled "Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption."
As ANP detailed on December 22, 2017, that executive order did not only specify foreign actors but also anyone within our government, presently or former officials, that are complicit or had been directly engaged in "(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or (2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption."
That EO also announced that anyone caught up within those parameters, could have their assets seized immediately and without warning.
Corsi believes that many things we have seen and reported on, are indicators that the stage is being set for something huge. Listen below.
What is your observation regarding the legalization of recreational cannabis? In my opinion cannabis, and other drugs as well as yoga will further enable a deluding influence for many in society to accept the antichrist as god.
I like the idea as long as you get the desired result?
What is the desired result? To garner more traffic?
More traffic may require more of your time?
If you do not have time to manage the sites from time to time, it most likely will become unglued as it has happened in the past?
You may need to set up two administrators/moderators beside yourself to keep things in check? But the moderators will need to be given guidance as to your desires as well as given flexibility to make judgment calls in your absence?
Body Language Expert Says Michael Wolff LIED During Interview
Which was a footnote link from:
Pixelated Boat, a comedy Twitter account with over 100k followers, wrote a hilarious parody of Wolff’s book on Friday. The fake passage said Trump thought the TV in his bedroom was broken because it didn’t have “The Gorilla Channel,” so aides strung together a number of gorilla documentaries and broadcast it as a fake cable channel for the president...
Bannon was raised in a staunchly Democratic, pro-union, Irish Catholic family. His high school was a Catholic Military School. After graduating from Virginia Tech, he went on to obtain his Masters at the Jesuit Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service. Georgetown's School of Foreign Service was founded by a Jesuit, and has "trained" many influential top government officials, among the alumni is non other than Bill Clinton.
Bannon also has been married and divorced 3 times. Three days after his second marriage, Bannon's new wife gave birth to twins. Bannon's past includes complaints of domestic violence filed against him.
Now, he seeks to destroy not only Trump's agenda, but hid Presidency as well. Bannon is not only a liar, he is a traitor.
On November 18, during his first interview not conducted by Breitbart Media since the 2016 presidential election, Bannon remarked on some criticisms made about him, saying that "Darkness is good: Dick Cheney. Darth Vader. Satan. That's power. It only helps us when they get it wrong. When they're blind to who we are and what we're doing."
Although I was aware of it, I failed to mention Bannon's connection to Goldman Sachs. Goldman is very much a part of the mini-elite that runs things from behind the curtain. Outwardly, over and over again, Goldman's "people" keep turning up in key positions at the Fed and the Treasury "... he who controls the money, controls the country."
Found in FDR's library was a letter he wrote to Col. House (the "Kingmaker"). In it, FDR stated "You and I both know, that since the time of Andrew Jackson, the bankers have run this country." From one elite insider criminal to another, it pretty much sums it all up.
Love ya buddy but in mentioning Goldman Sachs and Bannon's quote, I forgot to also mention that I think you went overboard when you said this:
"Here are just a few items that caused me concern about this man:
"Bannon was raised in a staunchly Democratic, pro-union, Irish Catholic family. His high school was a Catholic Military School."
Instead, one might expect from an unbiased p.o.v. something more like:
"Here are just a few items that caused me concern about this man:
"He obtained his Masters at the Jesuit Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service.
"Georgetown's School of Foreign Service was founded by a Jesuit, and has "trained" many influential top government officials, among the alumni is none other than Bill Clinton..."
I hope that (as you say) you take this in the spirit intended as I have found a lot of what you say of GREAT value!
For those that are interested in the tactics utilized by the "Deep State," this is a very important video. I haven't seen it for years and stumbled upon it on Youtube.
Produced in 1966, it contains interviews with eyewitnesses to the JFK assassination. Most of these witnesses were never interviewed by the Warren Commission, the reason being, that their accounts did not comport with the Warren Commission's predetermined conclusion ... that being the "lone nut assassin." Not only were these people not interviewed, their existence was denied, and some, were even threatened if they continued to speak about what they actually saw.
Why is this important? When JFK was eliminated, the incredibly crooked and corrupt LBJ became President, and a "new type of government" (predicted by none other than Jack Ruby to Earl Warren) was created, and that new "type" of government continues on to this day. This is what Trump is up against.
Judge for yourself as to the credibility of these eyewitnesses to this nation altering event:
I take what you say in the spirit in which it was written.
I do know quite a bit about the way the Jesuits have operated throughout history. Many nations, in fact, banned them ... all because of their clandestine, nefarious activities.
Having said that, I do not mean to say that EVERYONE that has attended Georgetown is of the same ilk. For example, one of my all-time favorite authors is Pat Buchanan ... a Georgetown Alumni. What I meant to imply re: Bannon was simply that his connections led me to feel somewhat suspect.
I hope that clears up what I had intended to say.
Thank you for saying that but I am puzzled because the point I made was NOT about your mention of the GUSOFS, just the opposite: Your statement PRIOR TO mentioning the School Of Foreign Service, to wit...
"Bannon was raised in a staunchly Democratic, pro-union, Irish Catholic family. His high school was a Catholic Military School."
Got it. I really only mentioned that as an incidental, thinking it was possibly a prep for his eventual GUSOFS. Catholic Military Schools are not all that common, at least to my knowledge. I did have a friend that attended one back in the 1960's, he then went on to a Jesuit university. He didn't turn out very well and ended up with a very bad reputation, with a lot of people actually hating him with a passion. Perhaps that influenced me via my subconscious to include that part about Brannon. Strange coincidence, my "friend" (now deceased) and Brannon look like they could have been brothers!
My two cents on possibly starting a Facebook page:
I wouldn't. It's great for keeping track of family who post pictures and events and (sometimes) everything they do all day every day, but for researching and discussing the latest news and happenings of New Agers and other enemies of the cross, it's not good at all.
It is also becoming more and more controlled in a Big Brother fashion, and is doing more and more censorship of Christian/Conservative postings by people with lots of followers. I don't like the direction it is going, and probably will be gone from there at some point. I've had others say the same thing (about leaving soon).
I suggest something like Holly Pivec's FulfilledProphecy page (http://www.fulfilledprophecy.com/), which has a discussion section. It also has a link to her blog page, which would be a lot like News With Views. Maybe you use NWV for article writing, and some other page like Fulfilled Prophecy for discussion, news links, etc, that has a prominent link to your NWV page. It's a little more work, but you can delegate a lot of that out to whomever you want. It can be moderated as much or as little as you want it to be. It will be MUCH better at doing what you want to do - share and discuss research into the New Age movement - if that's what you want.
Which brings me to what Dan Bryan asked above: What are your current goals? Tell us that, and we can better come up with some suggestions. He made some really good points that I agree with - you really could use a few moderators that you trust to make decisions on your behalf and in a fair-handed manner.
I really don't see Facebook as a good match for anything you might come up regarding goals, but I'll wait until I see what you want to accomplish before saying that with 100% certainty.
But a simpler version of something like it would be good for you.
At the top could be something like this:
Home | Constance's Most Recent Articles | Discussion | Downloads | Links | About | Archive | Donate
The first link would go to your News With Views page, which is where you'd post all your articles. The second would go to the discussion page, which could be set up however you want. Sectioned off by topic, or whatever. The third link goes to a page with downloadable files, replicating pretty much what is at the right top of this current blog site. Links would be the same as here also - whatever sites you want to have links to. About might be your bio, and other info. The Archive link would point back here. The last link you can have if you want to accept donations for your work (to help pay for keeping this site alive, plus pay for the new site, etc).
Facebook ALTERNATIVES should also be considered (again, depending on what, exactly, you want to achieve). Here's some examples:
#1) Social Networks: The 7 Best Facebook Alternatives
#2) The best Facebook alternatives 2017/2018 in overview
#3) Top Facebook Alternatives for Different Social Media
#4) What are the best Facebook alternatives?
#5) 6 Alternatives to Facebook
#6) Facebook Alternatives: 10 New Social Networks...
#7) New alternatives to Twitter, Google, Facebook rapidly emerging...
So when clicking on "home", you'd just see your latest article at the top, the previous one just below that, etc, like it is now, here. You can make it look and function however you want.
But again... what do you want? :^)
A new generation of L.A. Satanists finds community in blasphemous times
In November, in the candlelit basement of a house just above the Silver Lake Reservoir, Alexandra James walked over to an altar where her husband, Zachary, waited near a bleached human skull, teeth locked in eternal rictus. From the altar, she lifted a sword and drew points across his chest while a circle of onlookers watched solemnly (well, a few giggled too). An organist played eerie minor key chords and Alexandra turned to face the group.
“On this altar we consecrate swords to direct the fire of our unholy will,” she said. “A human skull, symbol of death. The great mother Lilith created us all, and will destroy us all.”
“Hail Satan! Hail Satan! Hail Satan!” The group chanted back. The Jameses had planned the ritual as the climax of a low-key house party that included a dozen or so friends associated with ritual magic — artists, writers, rock musicians who freely mingle occult vocabularies (Satanist, coven, witches), none taken too literally. But a bigger moment came a few hours later when word circulated that Charles Manson had died. Far from mourning a man whose crimes burned satanic imagery into the American mainstream, everyone cracked beers in celebration and jammed on psych rock tunes. Bonnie Bloomgarden, the singer for the band Death Valley Girls, joked that Manson’s spirit would be reincarnated as a small dog, and that she’d probably accidentally adopt it.
It was a great night for a heterodox generation of new self-described Satanists who are upending old “Rosemary’s Baby” and “Helter Skelter” stereotypes in service of radical politics, feminist aesthetics and community unity in the divisive time of Trump. Given the never-ending chaos in American life, when nuclear war seems to many to be just one juvenile presidential tweet away, a coterie of artists are rediscovering Satanism’s imagery and rituals in a city with a long, rich and weird history of contrarian philosophies. Traditionalists might debate if any of it is properly “Satanic” at all; this new take is much more feminist than nihilist, flexibly self-aware and better versed in internet culture than orthodox theology. “In terms of the aesthetics of the occult, it’s everywhere you look. There are so many young women especially who use occult imagery to define their identity,” said Anna Biller, a director whose 2017 film “The Love Witch” beautifully revamped ’70s Technicolor genre films for our era of wry misandry and new social movements. “What I’m trying to do is to transform the witch from a figure of male fear and fantasy into a figure of female power and sexuality. For some women it represents healing, for others, raw power, for others, the freedom to be unorthodox or to find their own spirituality outside of the family system,” she said. “It’s important for women to try to reclaim our images for ourselves.” That, more than anything, is the animating force behind this new wave of interest in both Satanism and the occult (which are two separate things, sometimes mingled together). If satanic rituals of old were centered on smashing Christian orthodoxy and middle American propriety — or, more basely, taking drugs and getting laid — this form of Satanism explicitly uses a huge range of ideas to give shape to the inchoate rage felt by so many — especially women and other marginalized groups. These new converts believe that when confronted with so much chaos, one way to make sense of it is to conjure it themselves...
CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH:  The Word became flesh to make us "partakers of the divine nature":78 "For this is why the Word became man, and the Son of God became the Son of man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God."79 "For the Son of God became man so that we might become God."80 "The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods."
"This segment of the catechism is "EXACTLY" what the MSOG and the Latter Rain doctrines teach. But because [according to your belief] they are protestant [therefore] they must be wrong and the RCC correct?"
There is a big difference between the Latter Rain God-Man theology and the RCC God-Man theology. Christians of the Latter Rain theology believe that they can, and will, become Divine NOW, and Christians of the RCC believe that they will become Divine when they get to Heaven.
Blogger Thomas Dahlheimer posted (in part) from the CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH:  ...
"79 "For the Son of God became man so that we might become God."80 "The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods."
This is one of the main tenets of the cult Mormonism, i.e. that "Mormons, who were once just men, will become Gods." Incidentally, Mormonism is not the only cult that teaches this blasphemous lie. As bad as I know Roman Catholicism to be, it's even worse than I thought!
This incredible lie has its basis in the garden and has a very tempting appeal to the fallen, prideful nature of man. Satan, falsely states to Adam & Eve: "For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and you shall be as gods ..." Genesis 3:5
PS: thinking that Mr. Dahlheimer might have misquoted from the Catholic Catechism, I looked it up for myself ... it is verbatim right out of their official Catechism.
Thanks for your kind words in regards to me and some others who contribute here. I’ve been absent from here of late for a variety of reasons, came back late yesterday with the intention of coming back today to respond to another (Dan Bryan), and seeing your comment was a nice welcome. But, I must ask: what is CBTS? (If it’s some ‘hashtag’ campaign, I’m clueless of it, as I’m not on twiddle or fakebook, as I see these as supreme time-wasters and worse. Perhaps someday I can be convinced otherwise, but for now the positives are outweighed by the negatives.)
Thomas Dahlheimer!! We actually agree on something! Specifically your comment @ 8:45 AM.
Dan Bryan 8:11 PM (and now RayB @ 11:23 AM),
I’m not Catholic, nor am I an RCC apologist; however, I must state that the key to understanding the RCC’s Catechism is looking at the footnotes. In your selection cited, if you follow the footnotes you’ll find a reference to 2 Peter 1:4, Irenaeus’ Against Heresies, Athanasius’ On the Incarnation, and Aquinas’ Feast of the Body and Blood. From my perspective, I have no issues with the first three, though one must read Athanasius in his context (I have this work). Having said that, I do think the Catechism could be more restrained in its verbiage and/or more explicit so that the reader doesn’t think it means Deification this side of the eschaton. Now, certainly, one can disagree on just what it means to become “children of God” (John 1:12-13) or “sons of God” (Romans 8:18-25), and I think the Catechism should read “children of God” rather than “become God” “might make men gods” (as should Athanasius and Aquinas).
Aquinas’ work assumes the “Real Presence” and Transubstantiation in the Eucharist, stances I do not share. Moreover, with his words “O precious and wonderful banquet that brings us salvation and contains all sweetness!” Aquinas implies that the Eucharist serves a salvific purpose (“through it sins are purged away”)—a position I vehemently oppose.
In any case Thomas Dahlheimer is correct above. The difference between the Latter Rain/MSoG crowd and the RCC’s Catechism is quite a wide chasm.
Re: your statement (in part):
... and I think the Catechism should read “children of God” rather than “become God” “might make men gods” (as should Athanasius and Aquinas).
The fact is, it does state exactly as it was intended.
The following is not directed to you personally, but is meant as a general observation.
I find it very interesting that when it comes to Roman Catholicism, often there are excuses for what is actually being proclaimed. As illustrated by the many heretical statements uttered by Pope Francis (along with numerous other Popes throughout history). When Francis declared "atheists that do good will go to heaven," I read all kinds of "interpretations" on that statement. The same can be said when he stated "gays that do good, and seek the Lord, will go to heaven. Who am I to judge?" Jesus said: "Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish." To give homosexuals (or any slave to sin) a false hope is doing the Devil's work, not the Lord's.
Why is it that we can't just take RC on what itself clearly declares, compare their claims to the Bible, and go from there?
And those quotes come directly, verbatim from Athanasius and Aquinas, respectively. You'll have to read those in their respective contexts to see the meaning. In any case, I know quite a few Catholics, and have read a number of works by Catholics, and not one of them has intimated in the slightest that they believe they are Deity in any form or fashion in the here and now. You yourself were surprised by this (which seems curious to me, for as an ex-RCC member you should have gone through the Cathechism), which tells me you were previously wholly unaware that the RCC speaks of Deification in any sense.
On a completely different note, a while back I'd read your comment regarding a healthy, mostly vegan diet as a means by which to (re)attain health. Having gone through this to some degree myself, I wholeheartedly agree that it's the typical Western diet (processed foods, etc.) that causes much of our ailments. Years ago, I used to suffer from gout (and I had suffered an attack about six weeks ago, presumably because I'd been lax in my diet), but they ceased after taking a radical 'about-face' in my diet. However, for me, as a single (divorced) man, it's rather difficult to stick with a (near) processed food-free diet in favor of whole foods, especially veggies (I'm not a fan of most veggies), legumes, and certain fruits (in moderation). Preparing food for one is just not that easy.
I rarely go to doctors anyway, but I wasn't about to try gout medication, as the side effects are not only not pleasant, but potentially life-ending. IMO, Americans in particular are WAAAAAY over-medicated.
I believe that he is probably right, and that he is proclaiming the Book of Revelation's three angles' messages, as he claims. However, because I believe that a lot of the bible scriptures, both in the Old and New Testaments, were inspired by Jehovah-Satan that, therefore, Veith's prophetic ministry is Satanic. The blatant evil deceptive tactics that he uses to deceive his followers, are the same tactics that other leading Christian opponents of the end-time New Age movement use. The Bible says that the first beast worships the dragon (Satan), so these end-time Christian prophets have to try to convince there followers that the New Age knowingly and directly worships Satan. It does not worship Satan, so I am exposing their evil deceptive tactics, so that they and their followers will, hopefully, repent and come to the truth. I hope that they will join the New Age Movement.
• Wife of Duck Dynasty Star Al Robertson Regrets Abortion: Think About My Aborted Baby Every Day
• Unborn Babies Can Dream in the Womb, Will Abortion be Their Nightmare?
• New abortion technique being marketed as “natural” … y’know, because murdering unborn babies...
• The Left Wants to Talk about Mental Health. Let's Start with THEIRS
Secret intelligence operative is breaking up the Deep State from within!
MUST-SEE INTERVIEW: HIGH-LEVEL INTELLIGENCE SOURCE UNLOADS DEEP STATE SECRETS
Globalists more determined than EVER to remove Trump from office!
Selenium Training in Chennai
For clarification purposes, although I was baptized Catholic as an infant, I was not brought up a Catholic.
I have never had a problem with individual Catholics, but I do have a problem with what their church teaches, as it is in clear conflict with the Scriptures. Having said that, I agree with you. I too have known countless Catholics throughout my lifetime, have also read quite a bit of Catholic material (including Aquinas's Summa Theologica), and don't ever remember seeing or hearing about the statement cited out of the Catechism.
Re: processed food, etc. you are right. I can appreciate being alone it might be a little difficult. My wife is very health conscious and pretty much keeps me on the straight and narrow. If we shop together she always walks us right past the potato chip isle and the ice cream freezer.
I came across a site the other day that rates processed food for health purposes.
Thought you might find it helpful:
And the award for ultimate hypocrisy goes to . . . the Hollywood class of 2018.
This year’s Golden Globes were meant to be a defiant, vibrant celebration of a post-Weinstein industry, an awards ceremony about so much more than meaningless awards. We were promised a reckoning, the leveling of a male-dominated industry that institutionalized the rape, abuse and harassment of women for decades.
Like so much Hollywood product, advance buzz was greatly exaggerated. NOT ONE actor or actress, on the red carpet or on stage, made direct reference to their industry’s greatest monster — the one they boast of slaying yet still want to appease.
Host Seth Meyers, in his opening monologue, was the ONLY person in the room to mention him by name.
“Harvey Weinstein can’t be here tonight because, well, I’ve heard rumors that he’s crazy and difficult to work with,” Meyers said. “But don’t worry — he’ll be back in 20 years when he becomes the first person ever booed during the ‘In Memoriam’ segment.”
And how did these brave, crusading, black-garbed, pin-wearing celebrities respond? They BOOED.
Same when Meyers made a crack about the disgraced Kevin Spacey fumbling a Southern accent. “Oh, is that too mean?” Meyers asked incredulously. “To Kevin Spacey?”
Even a tame Woody Allen joke fell flat. It seems there’s NO sexual predator who still doesn’t get Hollywood’s sympathy.
Yet many of the night’s honorees spoke like leaders of a revolution.
“May we teach our children that speaking out without fear of retribution is our culture’s new North Star,” said Laura Dern.
How about Meryl Streep? Streep has vocally denied knowing anything about Weinstein — whom she famously called “God” at the 2012 Globes — but instead preferred to talk in vague platitudes.
“I think that people are aware now of a power imbalance . . . and it’s led to abuse . . . and we want to fix that,” she told Ryan Seacrest.
What a profile in courage.
Meanwhile, NOT ONE presenting or accepting actress mentioned Rose McGowan, who kickstarted this entire movement and who says she was raped by Harvey Weinstein. Sitting together up front were Ashley Judd and Salma Hayek, who both went public with the abuse and torment Weinstein visited upon them; in the New York Times, Hayek wrote that Weinstein threatened to have her killed.
These women are heroes. NOT ONE of their colleagues called them out, thanked them, or acknowledged their bravery.
In perhaps the night’s most twisted hosanna, 101-year-old Kirk Douglas was honored with a standing ovation and special award. It didn’t take long for Twitter to light up over Douglas’s long-rumored rape of Natalie Wood when she was just 16.
If the average viewer at home knows about this, how could a room of insiders not? Just what are they trying to say?
Towards the end of the night, supporting actress winner Allison Janney — who won for playing Tonya Harding’s mother in “I, Tonya” — thanked the actual Harding, an invited guest, for “sharing her story . . . a story about truth and the perception of truth in the media.”
Harding, of course, was a real-life perpetrator of female-on-female crime, having her Olympic rival Nancy Kerrigan kneecapped — and though the movie exonerates her, Harding has admitted to at least having knowledge of a plot. Kerrigan later said the FBI told her they believed Harding was the mastermind and showed her transcripts detailing a plot to have her killed.
“That was one of the options,” Kerrigan said. “To kill me over a sporting event. That’s crazy.”
But in Hollywood’s version, Tonya’s a feminist hero. What a metaphor.
You’d think these Hollywood types had never heard an inspirational speech before. And please, Oprah said some ok things but nothing we’d consider life-changing … like Reese Witherspoon:
"I will now officially divide time like this: Everything that happened before @Oprah speech / Everything that will happen after."
It was a speech.
During the Golden Globes.
Made by an uber-wealthy, entitled elitist to a bunch of other uber-wealthy, entitled elitists pretending to care about something by wearing black.
Their lack of self-awareness is the stuff of LEGEND.
Although Calvin and Luther most certainly believed in an entity called Satan, they deny that Isaiah 14:12 has any connection with the devil or that Lucifer is his name. In Calvin's commentary of Isaiah 14, he says:
How art thou fallen from heaven! Isaiah proceeds with the discourse which he had formerly begun as personating the dead, and concludes that the tyrant differs in no respect from other men, though his object was to lead men to believe that he was some god. He employs an elegant metaphor, by comparing him to Lucifer, and calls him the Son of the Dawn; (220) and that on account of his splendor and brightness with which he shone above others. The exposition of this passage, which some have given, as if it referred to Satan, has arisen from ignorance; for the context plainly shows that these statements must be understood in reference to the king of the Babylonians. But when passages of Scripture are taken up at random, and no attention is paid to the context, we need not wonder that mistakes of this kind frequently arise. Yet it was an instance of very gross ignorance, to imagine that Lucifer was the king of devils, and that the Prophet gave him this name. But as these inventions have no probability whatever, let us pass by them as useless fables.
In Franz Delitzsch commentary of Isaiah, he quotes Martin Luther, saying:
Lucifer, the name of the devil, is derived from this passage, the reference of which to Satan is designated by Luther as insignis error totius papatus; but it is found already in Jerome and other Fathers.
According to Delitzsch, Luther believed the designation of this passage to Satan to be insignis error totius papatus or a noteworthy error of the papacy. 1
"Neither Martin Luther nor John Calvin believed there was such a character named Lucifer. They respectively blamed this error on the Catholic church and referred to this notion as nothing more than fairy tales and fables."
NBC was actively campaigning for Oprah for president. Their official Twitter account tweeted a picture of Oprah at the Golden Globes with a caption, “Nothing but respect for OUR future president #GoldenGlobes”
Your over-emphasis and over-interest in Satan is considerable.
There's something rather sick and wrong about that actually.
In order to enlighten others, you first have to be enlightened yourself, instead you're caught in the grip of jealousy and bitterness. A wanna-be.
However, your accidental mission to bore people, or make them laugh out loud, is working.
As you see, Thomas Dahlheimer is (after an all-too-brief respite) getting out of control again.
(Yeah, Thomas, you think that Lucifer is not Satan and you're going to rehash that, etc. AD NAUSEUM.)
Time for a once-a-week limit!
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]