Some of you blogspot readers and participants have thought the activities of the richly endowed, financed and highly networked activities of the Fetzer Foundation are now irrelevant. That is hardly the case. Those who received the disinformation of some Evangelical circles such as Walter Martin and Tal Brooke believe that few of importance had real plans during the 1980s and have them for now to take out the Christian world. Again, clearly not true. There is now a highly public campaign of which the Fetzer Institute is now a major player to make the very ugliest plans of "The Christ is Now Here" proponents of the 1980s happen now. They are so very confident that they will now succeed whereas in May 1982 they had a major disappointment because now, "a majority of people are SBNR -- 'spiritual but not religious.'"
The Fetzer Institute and its components, including the John B. Fetzer Memorial Trust Fund, have freely published and are extolling as good and necessary just about everything of which I warned starting in 1981, Benjamin Creme and all. For example, here is one they now have on their "Spiritual Library" in the form of an interview by Fetzer Institute Executive, Bruce Fetzer, a former Baptist Christian from Raleigh, North Carolina, who is the nephew of founder John Earl Fetzer (1901-1991). For the record, John Earl Fetzer, a former Seventh Day Adventist, was the person in charge of censorship for World War II and post events surrounding Nazism -- probably the one who kept news of Hitler's occultism so long bottled up; the enormously wealthy owner of many radio, tv, and cable stations. He left his entire huge fortune and the income it would engender from investments to making his dream of the New Age, complete with a new world financial system, a new world religion, and a new "Christ" who admittedly was not Jesus to happen as quickly as possible.
Even this past Sunday, the CBS 60 Minute program had a segment on one of these "feel good" everybody love everybody across political lines. It had a look and a feel to it, encouraging "facilitation," and I promptly googled it along with "Fetzer Institute" and bingo -- it was a Fetzer Institute funded program. It is in the workshops, the 'facilitation,' the 'meditations', where people go into their altered states that cause the New Age desired 'paradigm shifts' that cause the shifts in world view that they hope will lead to the acceptance of a "new gospel" that very clearly isn't. What is really being done with 'facilitation' is "initiation" -- hoped for initiation into their 'occult mysteries' that could well cost participants their very souls, as it most likely cost John Earl Fetzer his own soul.
Here is what I just found in the Fetzer archives this morning (copyrighted 2018 material) vis a vis even the extremes of Benjamin Creme and 'The Reappearance of the Christ" in statements by Bruce Fetzer himself:
The other thing I think needs to be elaborated on is that, in the history, at least in the archives as well as in some of the oral histories, there’s a fair amount of discounting of the 80’s and that John was trying to build in terms of creating a direct relationship between the upper and the lower. By that I mean the hierarchy and the physical, the inner life and the outer life. Here is a book, I brought a couple of selections here. Not all of the library that John gave me to read, but this is one of the books from Benjamin Creme called The Reappearance of the Christ and the Masters of Wisdom. It’s an interesting book because it’s one that John read as well. What it does is describe the relationship between the Masters and the hierarchy and the Christ Consciousness, and its application in the physical realm. The manifestation in this physical presence. It’s important as an independent reference, because the channelings with Jim Gordon talk very directly about the White Brotherhood, which is a council of Masters working with the Institute in the early days. John very much believed that there was a higher order to the universe that was giving direction to him to inspire the Institute, to carry on this inspiration in dynamic ways in the future, without creating a religion, by the way.''
This interview was not ancient history. It was recorded by Bruce Fetzer on July 6, 2011 and considered signficant enough to the Institute's aggressive work to be there now.
Reading and listening (a handy feature of Microsoft's EDGE Browser to read documents out loud) to other Fetzer library on live archived and searchable interviews, I learn that on March 10, 1982 John Earl Fetzer was eagerly awaiting the 'cleansing action' where many of us would 'disappear' or be sent to 'another dimension'. On April 25, 1982, his channeler, Jim Gordon, sent Fetzer a letter of congratulations -- the very day the world wide ads ran saying 'the Christ is now here.' May 20, 1982 was their day of great disappointment, but still their work to implement this anti-God vision continues with force as they strive to honor John Earl Fetzer's vision. I have learned that Michigan judges have been placed in Fetzer funded 'facilitation operations' and I'm sure it is a very small step towards forcing all us Michigan lawyers into same as part of "Continuing Legal Education."
So much is happening on so many fronts, but the Fetzer operation is a very important front.
Stay tuned!
Constance
1,219 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 601 – 800 of 1219 Newer› Newest»J,
Thank you for the discussion.
Im conjuring a longer answer but have an appointment soon.
Couple questions since u r reading and quoting from a book.
1. I don’t think the NEJM study that was retracted had anything to do with HQC, right?
2. How did RFK tie either of those studies to Gates and/or Fauci?
3. It appears they were published in May and retracted in June 2020, long before vaccines were authorized under EAU, if they were a NIH plot, not very effective?
4. EUA are administered by the FDA, not the cdc or nih.
5. The idea that an EUA can only be done if no alternate therapy is available is an overly strict interpretation of the statute. The FDA director has broad discretion there to determine within the word “adequate”.
A. HQC itself initially received EUA authorization.
B. Tamaflu exists yet we have flu vaccines
C. It’s a pandemic, the gov could pursue whatever it deems viable -the idea it would suppress HQC and/or ivermectin simply because such treatments might prevent the need for vaccines is preposterous.
6. We are nearly 2 years later and still there remains no double blind gold standard study indicating the effectiveness of HAC and/or Ivermectin against transmission, hospitalization and mortality. There is certainly enough money and political willpower on the right to have accomplished this were it true.
7. One bad study aside that was retracted by June 2020, I don’t think it’s true to imply that HQC wasn’t thoroughly tested and dismissed appropriately thereafter (and prior to vaccine EUA approval)?
8. Don’t journals publish seemingly good science for subsequent peer review? Isn’t that a part of the publishing process? The process worked, didn’t it? Is peer review ever done by natural news? Is anything ever retracted there?
I’ve got to run. Just kinda quick thoughts and not in any way an assignment I need u to answer. Im reading a follow up article from Sept 2020 where the lancet was acknowledging the mistakes they made and addressing the required changes they would be implementing thereafter to avoid such errors to the extent possible. It does help me to understand how these things happen in the first place. RFK jr, as a lawyer, is attempting to tie together nearly 500 pages of supposed circumstantial evidence without any real smoking guns. Humans lie. Even scientists can manipulate data.
X
J at 3:07 PM
"It was right as Merck and Pfizer were poised to release molnupiravir and Pfizermectin on the market, when the media launched the campaign to smear Ivermectin as a horse drug."
As with many things we see to date of how Big Pharma and Big Gov operate, timing is everything. I think that is why Fauci was dragging things out to keep lockdown controls tight on people, and fear that the only "answers" were going to come from him (his field of expertise)..the media hound "Mr. Science". The money and power gained in vaccines (and egos attached including Trump's biting the bait, wanting credit after the many hits he took from Russiagate) drove it, too. Before vaccine talk Trump was all over HCQ and he was beat up badly in the press and left hanging by Birx and Fauci for mentioning it...because they knew the timing was just as important and the "solutions" they proposed. At least Trump didn't want to force it and wanted it to be a health choice but I think Fauci/Gates think otherwise.
This is just my 2 cents but I may not be far off. Many more warts will being discovered as this goes on and it is horrible to me that people are bringing their fellow citizens down for money, prestige, and handing us all over to global controls in the interim.
I'm going to take #6 because I'm short on time, too. I actually think my response to it is something important that all Americans need to understand. This is not the only response. Far from it. It's just the one I think it's most important to highlight in my limited time.
"6. We are nearly 2 years later and still there remains no double blind gold standard study indicating the effectiveness of HAC and/or Ivermectin against transmission, hospitalization and mortality. There is certainly enough money and political willpower on the right to have accomplished this were it true."
The FDA is not necessarily always supposed to come in between doctors and patients. As long as a drug is FDA approved, a doctor is supposed to be able to prescribe a drug off-label to a patient, using the doctor's clinical judgement and clinical experience. Doctors learn in medical school how to be more than test readers, more than study readers and more than drug dispensers. Further, they are not supposed to be be told what to do by pharmacists. The COVID-19 response changed the doctor-patient relationship. The FDA came in between doctors and patients to an extent never before seen. Doctors for years, prior to COVID-19, prescribed up to 30% of drugs off label, meaning for a different use than the studied use.
In 2016, Congress passed the Cures Act. The Cures Act is supposed to allow doctors to use their clinical experience and their in-the-field evidence to prescribe treatments to patients. The Cures Act was supposed to direct the FDA to recognize that doctors and scientists can obtain helpful and life saving information by observing what works, even outside of a controlled trial setting.
In a circumstance of off-label drug use by doctors on the front lines, using their clinical experience, they are just supposed to inform the patient of the risks and benefits of the treatment. Treating a patient with a remedy that was not found via a multi-million dollar, double blind, placebo controlled trial has an especially good risk-benefit ratio if the patient is likely to DIE without it, and if the drug already has accumulated several decades worth of safety data.
Ivermectin and HCQ had both been considered safe for decades before the COVID-19 pandemic.
Look at how many things were not subjected to double blind, placebo controlled studies:
1) Lockdowns
2) Masks
3) Social distancing
4) Ventilators
4:30 PM,
I remember Trump touting HCQ, too. The media made it seem like Trump versus science, even though Fauci had a history of flip flopping regarding HCQ off-label use for previous viruses.
I think more is going to come out, too, but I wonder how much motivation people have to know it all, since we're so sick and tired of COVID. I procrastinated a long time about reading this RFK, Jr. book, myself.
"Joemicron" Biden Variant Has Unleashed An Economic PLAGUE Upon The Nation!
https://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2022/02/situation-update-feb-3rd-2022-joemicron-biden-variant-has-unleashed-an-economic-plague-upon-the-nation-mike-adams-must-video-3617746.html
J,
Regarding Ivermectin.
Many of those complaints by RFK, jr. about Merck (and Pfizer) are a commentary or criticism of our for-profit healthcare system. If Molnupiravir is similar but different or novel enough for Merck to get a new patent and thereby make money from it versus "marketing" and going to the expense of seeking approval for an expired patent on a drug which Merck itself won't really make money on is expecting too much from a for-profit company. I did see Merck was quoted as saying:
“There is a chance that there might be some modest effect that with a large enough trial you may be able to detect. But as a game-changer, as a silver bullet, the evidence is looking fairly strongly that it is not the case for this particular drug,” Wilson said."
Merck should be entitled to reap the rewards for creating it, right? That's progress and one of the supposed advantages of for-profit healthcare. Otherwise what would motivate them to try to make it better at all? That said, despite making buckets of money for Merck, recent results for Moinupiravir are indicating that even this new and improved "ivermectin plus" therapy is only moderately effective.
Pfizer's oral antiviral might be better, but Merck still expects $5B-plus from molnupiravir in 2022
Feb 3, 2022
https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/pfizer-s-oral-antiviral-might-be-better-but-merck-still-sees-5-6-billion-sales-for
"When a phase 3 study revealed 30% efficacy for Merck and Ridgeback’s COVID-19 oral antiviral—a significant drop from the 50% figure the company touted at the trial’s interim stage—concerns emerged about the relevance of the treatment, especially considering a rival version was in the works from Pfizer. This after barely passing muster from an FDA advisory committee, surviving by a 13-10 vote, and gaining emergency approval on Dec. 23, molnupiravir has still found plenty of demand."
Then there's the fact that molnupiravir and to a lesser extent Pfizer's offering could actually be creating more fertile grounds for variants. If these drugs are nothing more than repurposed Ivermectin, as RFK, jr presumes, then, I would presume this theory applies also to Ivermectin, right? In the viral arena, this may be a reason for governmental agencies and scientists at the FDA, CDC, and NIH to favoring vaccines over therapies (pharmaceutical influence would seem to favor therapies over less profitable vaccines).
A new drug to treat covid could create a breeding ground for mutant viruses: Merck’s molnupiravir is good at one thing — and that’s what makes it scary
Dec 24, 2021
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/12/24/merck-molnupiravir-antiviral-covid-fda/
There is an Ivermectin Study is underway with results coming out soon.
University of Minnesota ivermectin trial nearing completion
Proof of effectiveness would give doctors outpatient COVID-19 therapies amid limited antiviral and antibody supplies.
JANUARY 26, 2022
https://www.startribune.com/university-of-minnesota-ivermectin-trial-nearing-completion/600139471/
"The COVID-OUT study is reviewing three common drugs, including the antidepressant fluvoxamine and the diabetes treatment metformin, but gained attention for its inclusion of ivermectin. The controversial drug has been championed by opponents of COVID-19 vaccines, despite a warning from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that ivermectin is cleared only to treat parasitic infections, head lice and certain skin conditions."
Note also --- UM also did a study failing to support HCQ
I know this isn't addressing everything RFK, Jr. said but maybe it helps keep you above the conspiracy waters and discerning carefully. The search for truth, outside the Bible, is tiring and endless. I do not claim to have it cornered either.
x
Sun Dimming? Does Bill Gates think he's GOD???
International group of scientists are trying to stop Bill Gates' sun dimming experiment that would engineer Earth’s climate
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-02-03-scientists-trying-to-stop-bill-gates-sun-dimming-experiment.html
Facebook DELETING British Medical Journal Pfizer trial whistleblower article
Dr. Suneel Dhand
Some curious goings on with one of Big Tech’s largest companies, censoring one of the oldest and most well-respected medical journals in the world, the BMJ.
---
Old video, but still quite relevant:
Peter McCullough, MD testifies to Texas Senate HHS Committee
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
Testimony given March 10, 2021. Patient Guide here.
The one person that died that I know of all who had Covid, there was 16 of us who got it around the same time frame, he died on a ventilator. A couple of others who died with Covid were advanced in their old age and the cancers they had been battling.
His wife, a major stroke victim and severe diabetic got it and we all thought she would be the one who would die. Her husband was her caregiver and a healthy athletic man in his early 70's but it turned into pneumonia on him and we saw his progression kept going downhill after he went on a ventilator.
If only he had some Ivermectin we all said. I believe it would have saved him, early treatment would have saved him like it has saved many and is proven fact many times.
There's not much money in lowly Ivermectin--but big $$ to the hospitals etc for doing it Big Gov's way..
I believe that was the way it was for many people. There is blood on the hands of "the powers that be" -- those who make guinea pigs out of their population.
And God is taking names..
In response to 5:37
J,
100's of "Doctors??" appear to be still prescribing Ivermectin "off-label" and against the advice of the FDA and all the research to date.
Why do Americans keep taking ivermectin for COVID despite FDA warnings? Hundreds of doctors continue to prescribe it.
Feb 2, 2022
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2022/02/02/ivermectin-covid-flccc-alliance/6591039001/?gnt-cfr=1
I think the disconnect MAY be (shooting from the cuff here, cursory research) that most doctors believe/trust the research and don't find those drugs effective and therefore just won't write them (prescribe them).
Neither the Cures Act nor the Right to Try Act seem to give patients the right to demand physicians (& hospitals? or their pharmacies?) write (or fill) specific prescriptions according to their own personal google treatment plan.
This article seems to also imply State Licensing boards may have more regulatory abilities than the FDA. So maybe those are the agency blocking doctors/hospitals in some states. They certainly should block physicians from practicing medicine unlicensed in their state or, for example, perhaps prohibit non-practicing doctors like Dr. Cole from issuing prescriptions to non-patients.
What's the Right to Try Act and how does it apply to unapproved COVID-19 treatments?
Nov 23, 2021
https://helenair.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/whats-the-right-to-try-act-and-how-does-it-apply-to-unapproved-covid-19/article_41bbd7fd-a939-5f5f-8502-18a0e55b6fe9.html
"As it relates to physicians, you know, what they're recommending for treatment, that's really up to the physician in terms of what they're comfortable prescribing or recommending for a course of treatment," Meier responded. "… They're going to be trying to follow clinically best practices, of course, and we don't regulate the physician. Department of Labor and Industry would be the regulatory industry for that, but that's going to be up to the physician's judgment in term of what they're recommending for treatment and that's way outside of my lane."
Further...it appears pharmacists are not required to fill every prescription pro-offered.
Pharmacists have the right to refuse to fill ivermectin prescriptions
November 2021
https://www.pharmacytoday.org/article/S1042-0991(21)00838-0/fulltext#:~:text=Pharmacists%20have%20the%20right%20to%20refuse%20to%20fill%20medications%E2%80%94especially,for%20another%20FDA%2Dapproved%20indication.
"Pharmacists have the right to refuse to fill medications—especially ivermectin-containing products—if they believe that it is not being used for a legitimate medical purpose, even if the dosing is appropriate for another FDA-approved indication.
“It’s hard to determine if a patient has a valid patient-provider relationship if you get something online, so it’s up to the pharmacist to verify if there is a legitimate relationship or not between the provider and patient, and whether or not they feel comfortable filling the prescription,” said Skoy."
In essence, your contention that doctors should be left alone to collaborate and do what they determine, in their medical wisdom to be best for their patients, goes both ways.
x
An excert about remdesivir:
For HCQ, Dr. Fauci demanded well-designed randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials and he warned against the use of IVM for treatment. In contrast, Fauci green-lighted remdesivir following studies in which the control group did not receive the real placebo. Instead, Fauci's researchers used no placebo in the more severely ailing patients and gave the remaining patients an "active comparator" containing the same treatment protocol agents as used in the remdesivir arm except substituting sulfobutyl for remdesivir as the test agent. Utilization of so-called "toxic" or "spiked" placebos -- also known as "fauxcebos" -- is a fraudulent gimmick that Dr. Fauci and his drug researchers have pioneered over forty years to conceal adverse side effects of toxic drugs for which they seek approval. Dr. Fauci eventually recruited 400 US hospitalized volunteers for NIAID's remdesivir trials, but despite this fauxcebo chicanery, Dr. Fauci's researchers just couldn't get remdesivir to show any improvement in COVID survival.
Despite its disappointing performance, Dr. Fauci worked hand-in-hand with Gilead's remdesivir team to guide the trial to a satisfactory outcome. According to Vera Sharav, the President and founder of the Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP), "The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) had complete control over the trial and made all decisions regarding trial design and implementation. Gilead Sciences employees participated in discussions about protocol development and in weekly protocol team calls with NIAID."
Sharav's organization, Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP), monitors the quality and ethical performance of clinical trials. NIAID's remdesivir trial's original endpoint made sense: to win approval, the drug would need to demonstrate a "reduction in COVID mortality." However, the drug didn't show the hoped-for benefit. While fewer patients receiving remdesivir died, those receiving remdesivir were also a lot less sick than the placebo subjects when they entered the trial. So Dr. Fauci's team decided to move the goalposts. The researchers, in fact, had changed the trial "endpoints" twice in an effort to create a meager appearance of benefit. Dr. Fauci's new endpoints allowed the drug to demonstrate a benefit, not by improving the chances of surviving COVID, but by achieving shorter hospital stays. Yet this too was a scam, because it turned out that almost twice as many remdesivir subjects as placebo subjects had to be readmitted to the hospital after discharge -- suggesting that Fauci's improved time to recovery was due, at least in part, to discharging remdesivir patients prematurely. Altering protocols in the middle of an ongoing study is an interference commonly known as "scientific fraud" or "falsification." UCLA Epidemiology Professor Sander Greenland explains, "You're not supposed to change your endpoint mid-course. That's frowned upon." Vera Sharav agrees. "Changing primary outcomes after a study has commenced is considered dubious and suspicious."
RFK, Jr. on COVID vaccines, just a tiny portion of what he has to say about it.
...Dr. Fauci allowed CDC to discourage autopsies in deaths following vaccination. CDC refused to recommend autopsies on deaths reported to VAERS. That omission allowed the agency to repeatedly make the audacious, fraudulent declaration that all the 16,000 reported deaths following vaccination by October 2021 were "unrelated to the vaccines." The regulatory agencies thereby abolished vaccine deaths and injuries by fiat.
Instead of exposing this sort of rank deception by government authorities, media and social media enablers emboldened HHS to new nadirs in regulatory malpractice. In January of 2021, baseball superstar Hank Aaron, whom I knew, died seventeen days after receiving the COVID jab at a CDC-sponsored press conference in Atlanta. I observed, in a Defender article, that Aaron's death was one of a wave of deaths among the elderly following COVID jabs. This was true, but the New York Times nevertheless vilified me for spreading "misinformation" and claimed that the Fulton County Coroner had determined that Aaron's death was "unrelated to vaccines." USA Today, Newsweek, TIME, Daily Beast, ABC, CNN, and CBS reported the Times claim. But when I called to verify their claim, the Fulton County Coroner told me that the office has never seen Aaron's body and that no autopsy was ever performed. Aaron's family had buried the home-run hero without a postmortem. The Times' fabrication was part of the systematic campaign of deception, propaganda, and censorship by HHS regulators in partnership with mainstream media -- almost unprecedented in the American experience -- that helped conceal the tsunami of vaccine injuries and fatalities.
What RFK, Jr. says about Pfizer's own data about the clot shot:
Pfizer's six-month clinical data for its COVID vaccine trials showed that, while the vaccine would avert a single death from COVID-19, the vaccinated group suffered 4x the number of lethal heart attacks as the unvaccinated.
More:
By August 2021, Dr. Fauci, the CDC, and White House officials were reluctantly conceding that vaccination would neither stop illness nor transmission, but nevertheless, they told Americans that the jab would, in any case, protect them against severe forms of the disease or death. (It's worth mentioning that HCQ and ivermectin could have accomplished this same objective at a tiny fraction of its price.) Dr. Fauci and President Biden, presumably with Dr. Fauci's prompting, told Americans that 98 percent of serious cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were among the unvaccinated. This was a lie. Real-world data from nations with high COVID jab rates show the complete converse of this narrative; the resumption of infections in all those countries accompanied an explosion of hospitalizations, severe cases and deaths among the vaccinated! Mortalities across the globe, in fact, have tracked Pfizer's deadly clinical trial results, with the vaccinated dying in higher numbers than the non-vaccinated. These data cemented suspicions that the feared phenomenon of pathogenic priming has arrived, and is now wreaking havoc.
Thanks a lot, J, for taking the time to share this information.
And there is so much of it, this being I'm sure only some in what you have posted already.
Rich,
How about limiting X to one post per week?
That, or let Christine post freely.
Christine is mostly liked here, I think anyway. X is largely NOT! Quite the opposite.
Seems like the scales of justice are broken.
A little gem
Vinay Prasad
Jan 30
A colleague sent me this interesting slide that was buried in an FDA VRBAC presentation. Understanding it immediately reveals a problem.
[see graph at link]
These data are from Israel concerning boosters. Look the the rates of severe disease in the boosted vs. non boosted population 16 to 39. Yes, I know the confidence interval is vast, but still.
The rate of severe disease in the non-boosted is 0.6 per million. In the boosted is 0.1 per million— a difference of 1 in 2 million. Of course the confidence interval is as wide as a battleship, but this is the ballpark we are in.
And yes of course, as COVID eventually infects us all, both numbers will go up. Though Omicron is milder, so we don’t know just how high.
And of course, it will vary in healthy vs. not-healthy.
But just think about the number for a second: 1 in 2 million severe disease are averted by boosting. How much myocarditis do you need with dose 3 to offset that gain?
Even 1 in a million will tip the scale. 1 in 100,000 will topple the scale, and 1 in 10k will be a landslide. We are going to be in the 1 in 10^5 ballpark people.
People are not thinking clearly. 2 shots in a healthy young person puts bad covid outcomes under the floor. A booster will be detrimental with even a tiny safety signal.
Boosting young men is nuts.
Paul Offit is correct.
When everyone eventually sees this, mass vaccination efforts will be in serious jeopardy. The backlash will make our head spin. This won’t end well.
It's looking more and more as though Javier Solana may be coming back in the European Union picture. Rich of Medford and I are taking a close look at that and will keep you posted as we learn more.
Constance
I have continued to keep an eye on Solana too, Constance. I think so too. Borrell has had his struggles in his old position and I've wondered if Solana might make his way back to it, or something like that position to make a public comeback. He has been the most unretired retired man ever. He obviously still has very high hopes for the EU's place on the world stage.
I learned of you through following Herb Peters. About the same time I saw your book in our church library. Something told me to stick with your researches. I have not been at all surprised that the things you were writing of have continued to move out from the shadows increasingly into the limelight. And a Great Reset well on it's way now has had me wondering where Solana would fit in to that picture.
https://twitter.com/EUProphecyNews/status/1487891776186818566?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Eembeddedtimeline%7Ctwterm%5E
Constance, Solana retweeted this article.
His finger stays on the pulse..
Craig,
I think Prasad is mistaken.
The study itself says the numbers in that group are too small to make any reliable estimate of anything.
Further, it appears to me Prasad is trying to break it down to 1 in 2 million as though it's speaking of rates per million population when the denominator in this study calculation is really based upon some calculation or analysis of persons per days of risk. I'm not sure what the difference is statistically, but I think it has to do with when in the testing period each participant got boosted and younger Israeli's were just boosted later in the testing period.
My guess in the cohort probably didn't have enough younger persons under the age of 39 who were boosted within the time frame as the cohort closed in October 2021 (as I recall) nor many that got severly ill to make anything of the computation. 1 singular "severe illness" is hardly a number to base anything upon, let alone calling it a "little gem".
x
J at 9:36 pm said:
"President Biden, presumably with Dr. Fauci's prompting, told Americans that 98 percent of serious cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were among the unvaccinated. This was a lie. Real-world data from nations with high COVID jab rates show the complete converse of this narrative; the resumption of infections in all those countries accompanied an explosion of hospitalizations, severe cases and deaths among the vaccinated! Mortalities across the globe, in fact, have tracked Pfizer's deadly clinical trial results, with the vaccinated dying in higher numbers than the non-vaccinated"
My respectful rebuttal:
Notice how RFK switches populations there? Biden, I presume, was speaking about the experiences in the US, or part thereof, where, in the early summer days when I recall this statement being made, the delta wave had started throughout the south and vaccine effectiveness was really not waning yet at all. Nearly all the serious illnesses being seen in hospitals were unvaccinated because the US, and the red southern states in particular had large populations of unvaccinated with covid infections running rampant through it.
But RFK uses a sleight of hand to switch to "real world data" and cherry picks countries where vaccine uptake was very high. He doesn't mention that their rates of hospitalization and mortality were extremely low, just that, numbers-wise, by a hand count, more vaccinated people were severely ill or dying at some point in time in some country somewhere. Even in those "real world" other countries that wasn't the case until later in the fall as "full vaccination" started waning and larger numbers of those countries unvaccinated had some level of natural immunity via prior infection. In other words, RFK, jr is the liar.
For the fact stated above, it's also dishonest entirely for RFK to claim it's a function of "pathogenic priming" at all. The rates of death among unvaccinated populations absent prior infection are and have remained multitudes of factors above those wise and compassionate enough to have gotten mRNA vaccinated and boostered against Covid populations throughout this pandemic and in every country.
I double-checked this and it appears this statement was made on July 21st, 2021. It included the words "thereabout" and was based upon the data from June 2021 provided to Biden by the CDC's Dr. Welenski (not Fauci, surprise).
Here's the fact check provided by politico:
“Ten thousand people have recently died. 9,950 of them, thereabouts, are people who hadn’t been vaccinated."
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jul/22/joe-biden/fact-checking-joe-bidens-figure-unvaccinated-covid/
Summary:
• Biden is citing a figure that has been offered publicly on at least two occasions by the director of the CDC, Dr. Rochelle Walensky.
• Walensky cautioned that the data is “preliminary,” is based on only a half dozen or so states, and is now about six weeks old. The CDC has not made public any detailed data or methodology.
• Despite these shortcomings, experts told PolitiFact that they don’t doubt the figure’s accuracy. The figure is also in line with a separate analysis by the Associated Press.
x
J,
I did want to go back briefly to the Surgishere scandel. I don't see any reason to believe it was a coordinated effort by pharma and/or dr. fauci to dispute or undermine HCQ. From the sound of it, it appears to be a scientist/doctor type, much like Dr. Malone and Dr. Peter MacCullough that just sought fame and noteriety and tied to use an AI computer to analyze some data set he created or found or sourced from somewhere. This whole pandemic has seen many of these types crawling out of the woodwork overselling their expertise and capitalizing on this novel situation. The paper on HCQ was published in May and retracted in June. The process of peer review did it's job. If only RFIK applied that level of distrust and conspiracy seeking on the people that did the fake ivermecting study, or on Dr. Malone or Dr. Cole.
Anyway...here's some insight into the Surgisphere scandel.
Who's to blame? These three scientists are at the heart of the Surgisphere COVID-19 scandal:
Author partnership on coronavirus papers is “completely bizarre” and should have been a red flag, former journal editor says
June 8th, 2020
https://www.science.org/content/article/whos-blame-these-three-scientists-are-heart-surgisphere-covid-19-scandal
Here's a story about changes implemented by the Lancet after the error.
"COVID-19 data scandal prompts tweaks to elite journal's review process: After publishing study based on unverified patient data from Surgisphere, a little-known company, The Lancet promises tighter standards"
September 18, 2020
https://www.science.org/content/article/covid-19-data-scandal-prompts-tweaks-elite-journal-s-review-process
Excerpt: "The now-retracted study, published in May, relied on data from the small Chicago-based company Surgisphere, which purported to have collected and analyzed patient records from hundreds of hospitals around the world. But the paper's central claim—that antimalarial drugs increased COVID-19 patients' risk of death—quickly unraveled as observers questioned the study's large sample size and details about patient demographics and dosing. The Lancet retracted the paper when Surgisphere declined to make underlying data available for an independent audit. The same day, The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) retracted another study using Surgisphere data, which found that certain blood pressure drugs didn't increase the risk of death from COVID-19."
x
p.s. - ironic that the Surgisphere study on HCQ did turn out to be right. Nobody other than the lead auther has seen the data, it might have been real data acquired illegally? Who knows. Not fit for publishing but interesting AI got the right answer.
X,
RETRACTED is scarcely the same thing is PEER REVIEWED. As a purported doctor, you should well understand the peer review process. This is done BEFORE publication, NOT after. Once published, it is VERY unusual for works to be RETRACTED.
Below is an example of peer review by Wiley:
The peer review process
1. Submission of Paper
The corresponding or submitting author submits the paper to the journal. This is usually via an online system such as Scholar-One Manuscripts. Occasionally, journals may accept submissions by email.
2. Editorial Office Assessment
The journal checks the paper’s composition and arrangement against the journal’s Author Guidelines to make sure it includes the required sections and stylizations. The quality of the paper is not assessed at this point.
3. Appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC)
The EIC checks that the paper is appropriate for the journal and is sufficiently original and interesting. If not, the paper may be rejected without being reviewed any further.
4. EIC Assigns an Associate Editor (AE)
Some journals have Associate Editors who handle the peer review. If they do, they would be assigned at this stage.
5. Invitation to Reviewers
The handling editor sends invitations to individuals he or she believes would be appropriate reviewers. As responses are received, further invitations are issued, if necessary, until the required number of acceptances is obtained – commonly this is 2, but there is some variation between journals.
6. Response to Invitations
Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their own expertise, conflicts of interest and availability. They then accept or decline. If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers.
7. Review is Conducted
The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. Otherwise they will read the paper several more times, taking notes so as to build a detailed point-by-point review. The review is then submitted to the journal, with a recommendation to accept or reject it – or else with a request for revision (usually flagged as either major or minor) before it is reconsidered.
8. Journal Evaluates the Reviews
The handling editor considers all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional reviewer so as to get an extra opinion before making a decision.
9. The Decision is Communicated
The editor sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. Whether the comments are anonymous or not will depend on the type of peer review that the journal operates.
---
5 important medical studies that were later retracted
Consider the conclusion of a systematic survey assessing retractions in oncology, published in Research Integrity and Peer Review.
“The number of retracted publications in the cancer literature is increasing rapidly, and cancer retractions are largely due to academic misconduct as opposed to honest error,” wrote the authors. “Consequences to cancer patients and the cancer research community at large can be significant as invalid publication may have a detrimental effect on patients treated in everyday practice. Despite the implications of this important issue, cancer journals fall short of the well-articulated COPE/ICMJE guidelines on the reporting of retractions.”
Retractions almost ALWAYS receive less attention than the initially published article, to the point that some CONTINUE to site the already retracted article, as if nothing had happened. (Same thing with 'news' articles.)
With hardly any penalties for publishing faulty (fraudulent) articles, there's little incentive to NOT do so, in fact, more incentive TO DO SO.
Dr. Sam White Interview - Doctors Are Being Suppressed, Censored & Attacked For Telling The Truth
https://youtu.be/t1kt5mWnjU8
Craig 4:45 AM,
Thank you for that needed clarification about retraction versus peer review. X won't care, but somebody else may learn something from it. I learned a little bit. I sensed X was polishing a turd for Big Pharma by confusing retraction with the peer review process. The retraction was actually the result of failing to follow an appropriate peer review process. And to me that failure seems unlikely to have happened due to carelessness or incompetence.
WOW ~ is this what's really behind the SHAKEUP at CNN???.
Is this the man who axed Jeff Zucker? Billionaire Trump-donor ~ who is the largest shareholder at Discovery and wanted to restore left-wing CNN to impartial journalism ~ insisted on Zucker's departure after affair was exposed
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10476079/Billionaire-John-Malone-known-corporate-policies-followed-Zuckers-romance.html
J @ 9:11 AM,
You're welcome. I sense you're right.
Complicity is the word that comes to mind.
If you ever saw the crazy Leprechaun movie, you would remember that the Leprechaun had an obsessive compulsive disorder about polishing shoes. If somebody threw some shoes in his direction, he could not help but stop and polish them.
If there is such a thing as a paid troll for Big Pharma, I think such a troll might be paid to scurry to polish the turds of Big Pharma just as fast and well as they can.
I'm all out of time for a little while. I'll just have to return to the topic of the RFK, Jr. book after another week or two.
Many a turd floats in the punchbowl of koolaid X drinks from.
His posts suggest he's hooked up to an intravenous drip of it.
What the Ministry of Propaganda, aka, the mainstream media is NOT telling you about January 6th.
Who Really Died on 1/6 and Why?
https://www.kristileightv.com/post/who-really-died-on-1-6-and-why
PS: When is the FBI going to arrest Ray Epps for being an over the top provocateur?
Whistleblower: Gunshot Wounds, Baby Deliveries, Car Accidents All Being Coded as “COVID” in Hospitals to Keep Federal Funding Flowing
https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/whistleblower-gunshot-wounds-baby-deliveries-car-accidents-all-being-coded-as-covid-in-hospitals-to-keep-federal-funding-flowing/
"More evidence is surfacing showing that hospitals today are still collecting federal funds as an incentive to diagnose patients with “COVID” via a PCR Test, even if the patient was brought to the hospital with gunshot wounds, or to have a child, or from a car accident."
"Project Veritas released a video yesterday of a whistleblower, Jeanne Stagg, who was working as a Senior Administrative Nurse at United Healthcare in Louisiana."
"She came forward to expose the fraudulent practices still going on in hospitals today where people who have no symptoms of COVID come into the hospital, such as from gunshot wounds, or to have a baby, or because they were in a car accident, and are then tested positive for COVID and coded as a “COVID patient” when they are admitted to the hospital."
"This releases federal funding that financially benefits the hospitals, but can literally kill the patient because they get the wrong treatment."
Anonymous Anonymous said...
https://taylerhansen.substack.com/p/capitol-offense-the-ugly-truth-behind
Awful.
8:53 PM
My post from previous page of this thread, RayB.
People need to let these on the ground in real time facts show them what went down compared to the narrative the media and the politicos want us to be fed.
Plus J I still haven’t seen any takers reaching for the polished up pile.
J and Craig,
Retractions are not uncommon. Peer-review does happen all the time post-publication as others try to replicate the results.
In 2018 it was reported that about 400-500 scientific papers are retracted each year. The Lancet and certainly NEJM have better reputations than most, but mistakes happen, especially when dealing with possible altered or fabricated private patient data that makes full and public disclosure for review troublesome. There is a process for retraction too.
Database of Retracted Papers Launched For Researchers
https://www.enago.com/academy/database-of-retracted-papers-launched-for-researchers/
I do get how sometimes these types of mistakes linger in the ether and have enduring consequences. Like when the now-discredited Andrew J. Wakefield was the lead doctor on a retracted study that claimed to link vaccinations to autism. Despite being retracted, many people still believe the two are connected.
Fortunately, that didn't happen here. Here's the history:
HCQ was given "premature" EUA on March 28, 2020 based on a very weak and/or small French study suggesting it MIGHT have a therapeutic effect. On June 15, 2020 that EUA approval was withdrawn and the FDA's "Letter revoking EUA for chloroquine phosphate and hydroxychloroquine sulfate" dated 6/15/2020 specifically stated the following about that Dr. Mehra (Surgisphere) study:
"In an Addendum included in the Memorandum, reviewers additionally evaluated a large observational study of HCQ and CQ with or without a macrolide for the treatment of patients hospitalized with COVID-19, based on data from a multinational registry (Mehra et al). This publication was subsequently withdrawn by the authors and will not be included in this
Memorandum. (emphasis mine)
The whole conspiracy theory RFK jr is trying to circumstantially present is absurd. The government (Fauci), in bed with big pharma, supposedly worried HCQ would save too many lives in 2020 and they wouldn't get to introduce their golden vaccines if it did so they plotted and schemed together, with Dr. Fauci in the lead to publish and promote quickly retracted studies to prevent that and yet, still, 2 years later nowhere in the world has HCQ worked to actually save lives at all or in any meaningful manner?
For a while in 2021 Vaccines were near 100% effective against the alpha variant and remained in the neighborhood of 90% effective against Delta with waning effectiveness. Is RFK, Jr. or any of you claiming HCQ or even Ivermectin are even 1%-25% effective? The death rates upon hospitalization have gone down of the last 2 years as they have been doing something right and learned a thing or two about decreasing mortality. You do understand ICU's and hospitals can't fill patients with 10-15 different experimental speculative drugs that MAY or COULD each have say a 1%-10% effectiveness when given alone but mixed together make things worse? How do you figure out what works if you do that?
Another thing to notice statistically. Vaccines are super effective and STILL fairly hard to substantiate due to the numbers involved and the covid mortality rate. There are so many confounding factors involved within cohorts and populations to make comparisons very tricky. Especially for lay people like RFK. There's just enough gray area for con artists and snake oil salesmen to come in and misinterpret the data and spread misinformation. Can you imagine the field day that would have been if the US government was authorizing and paying for every American to take pills of ivermectin and/or hcq that MAY yet someday be shown to be 1% or 10% or some level of effectiveness at some level of dosing at some specific unknown point in time within the covid illness cycle? How many Americans would refuse to take them? MAGA would be calling them Fuaci death pills and spreading misinformation about them too.
x
The vaccines do a number on our immune systems.
They interfere with natural immunity doing a good job of disabling what nature (actually God) put in place so people with healthy immune responses should have the choice to forego the vaccines and others who may be thinking they need the "boost(?)" of vaccines can chose them.
I think they are putting themselves in harm's way to do so and that is my opinion in watching this episode unfold, but so be it, let people choose.
The unvaccinated are nobody's problem. The vaccinated, however, could be very much part of helping keep these viruses afloat and in that way the ones in the way of better response to seeing the viruses weaken and take an exit.
If vaccines were so damn good the unvaccinated should pose no problem for the vaccinated in that case. Let people have their "consequences" (good or bad) because they aren't hurting anyone else.
And notable too, why, if vaccines are so effective, do they need such an aggressive sell????
The reason is the money...(and power that goes with) and shills (of which I think x is one) are raking it in. They have to push it hard and non-stop to keep their cash cow producing.
I'm glad more people are catching on to the schemers hype, but is it too late in this game?
Lots of immune systems have taken a hit by the jabs.
But hopefully there is a way and time to undo the damage?...well.....
I am not holding my breath on that one.
J and Craig,
Retraction Watch has accumulated and cataloged 209 retractions and 9 expressions of concern regarding scientific papers and studies involving Covid.
https://retractionwatch.com/retracted-coronavirus-covid-19-papers/
Such list is not political, just bad/retracted science.
It not only includes Dr. Mehra's (Surgisphere) quickly retracted studies (#33) & (#29)
The list of retractions includes TWO studies involving apparently fabricated data sets used by Dr. Kory. First (#36) is a study published December 15, 2020 and not retracted until October, 2021 regarding the efficaccy of Kory's MATH protocol:
Bad MATH+? Covid treatment paper by Pierre Kory retracted for flawed results
https://retractionwatch.com/2021/11/09/bad-math-covid-treatment-paper-by-pierre-kory-retracted-for-flawed-results/
Excerpt:"‘The data from Sentara Norfolk General Hospital that [are] reported in this paper are inaccurate. The paper briefly states the methods as: “Available hospital outcome data for COVID-19 patients treated at these 2 hospitals as of July 20,2020 are provided in Table 2 including comparison to the published hospital mortality rates from multiple COVID-19 publications across the United States and the world. ‘We have conducted a careful review of our data for patients with COVID-19 from March 22, 2020 to July 20, 2020, which shows that among the 191 patients referenced in Table 2 that the mortality rate was 10.5%, rather than 6.1%. In addition, of those 191 patients, only 73 patients (38.2%) received at least 1 of the 4 MATH+ therapies, and their mortality rate was 24.7%. Only 25 of 191 patients (13.1%) received all 4 MATH+ therapies, and their mortality rate was 28%.’
And, then again (#162) Dr. Kory and Frontline Doctors (FLCCC) published in January 2021 a study titled: “Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis & Treatment of COVID-19,”. It was published as an abstract at Frontiers in Pharmacology, and removed without notice or fanfare on March 1, 2021. Coverage of this removal by The Scientist can be found at:
https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/frontiers-removes-controversial-ivermectin-paper-pre-publication-68505
As Craig points out above..."Retractions almost ALWAYS receive less attention than the initially published article, to the point that some CONTINUE to site the already retracted article, as if nothing had happened. With hardly any penalties for publishing faulty (fraudulent) articles, there's little incentive to NOT do so, in fact, more incentive TO DO SO." (end Craig quote)
I promise never to link to anything published by Dr. Mehra again. Can you all say the same about Dr. Kory?
x
X @1:19 above,
You're full of bologna.
I found myself reading your post above, even though I knew where you'd be heading. (I'm going back to collapsing your posts. It's really easy; just click on the "anonymous" title at the top of his posts, and voila! What a relief.)
Sure enough and right on cue, you pull out the "Robert Kennedy doesn't understand these scientific things" card. You're so very wrong. You're not just wrong though; you are willfully misleading and lying. You are of your father, the devil.
RFKjr is EXTREMELY well informed, to the point where he doesn't need notes to remember intricate facts about every aspect of this debate. He is currently in court with just about all the Big Pharma goons, and he's already beaten them in court before. He isn't unarmed. He has dozens of experts in every field related to Virology and Pharmaceutics, and Vaccines and basically every major study that's been done. These scientists and doctors are from Harvard and Stanford, and Johns Hopkins, etc etc.
Almost every bit of data that he quotes is directly from Pfizer's and/or Moderna's and/or Astra Zenica's own published findings! And it's most often facts that aren't commonly known to the public simply because nobody reads those long, super fine print inserts that they have to include in their drugs. He sites facts from the CDC and and all the other alphabet bodies. He sites science and he never throws in opinions at all.
Wake up people! The Pharma giants have been indemnified from lawsuits by the government. The vaccines are not approved or properly tested and the people who take them are guinea pigs. AND most of the data that Little Tony Fauxci quotes is a pack of lies, long story short.
X, you must be working for the devil himself, considering the things that you attack and the things that you endorse.
Talk is cheap. Jesus warned us; "By their fruits you will know them".
X is known by his, (it's?) fruit. In this case rotten fruit. Throw it out.
Quick question
RFK, jr’s first and continuing passion is as a big advocate for climate change and has exposed big oil influence throughout politics.
Do you believe him? Or is he a liar when he claims there is a global warming crisis?
He’s also a lifelong democrat. Doesn’t that make him a new age baby killing marxist? Just surprised to see you trusting and supporting a new age baby killing marxist.
X
Is John Malone the man who axed Jeff Zucker???
(The Billionaire Trump-donor ~ who is the largest shareholder at Discovery and wanted to restore left-wing CNN to impartial journalism ~ insisted on Zucker's departure after affair was exposed.)
John Malone is chairman of Liberty Media, Discovery's largest shareholder
He previously donated $250,000 to Trump's inauguration, and told of wanting to restore CNN to impartial journalism after years of left-wing bias
After CNN chief Jeff Zucker's relationship with colleague Allison Gollust was revealed, Malone reportedly made it clear policies must be followed
CNN will be folded into Discovery as part of a $43billion deal
Zucker was due to stay on in some capacity and even take a bigger role at Discovery, but now has been cast out
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10476079/Billionaire-John-Malone-known-corporate-policies-followed-Zuckers-romance.html
"new age baby killing marxist"
You again...talking about yourself again..
And still having trouble separating apples from bananas aren't you?
How to DEFEAT micro blood clots and block the spike protein by protecting the QUALITY of your blood
Doctors and researchers are now confirming that nearly all the negative side effects and deaths stemming from covid vaccines are the result of blood clots. Many of those clots are very small and unable to be easily detected with standard medical imaging equipment.
These clots, called “micro blood clots,” can cut off the blood supply to small regions of the brain, organs and tissues throughout the body.
The resulting die-off of local cells can be expressed in the body as a tingling sensation, numbness, loss of sensory acuity, organ failure, loss of cognitive function and even notable personality changes as people lose higher brain function.
“Micro blood clots seem to be the likely cause of millions of health impacts and deaths from COVID infection as well as from COVID vaccines, and even millions of long COVID victims suffering diverse health problems with no apparent medical solution,” reports LifeSiteNews.
That story quotes Dr. Peter McCollough:
...the Spike Protein itself caused coagulation or blood clotting. And a unique type of Coagulation. It caused the red blood cells to stick together. At the same time, the platelets stick together. So this is a very different type of blood clotting that we would see with major blood clots in the arteries and Veins. For instance, blood Clots involved in Stroke and heart attack. Blood clots involved in major blood vessels in the legs. This was a different type of clotting and in fact the Italians courageously did some autopsies and found micro blood clots in the lungs. And so, we understood in the end the reason why the lungs fail is not because the virus is there. It is because micro blood clots are there. When people can’t breathe, the problem is micro-blood clotting in the lungs. The spicule on the ball of the virus itself damages blood vessels that causes blood clotting.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-02-04-how-to-defeat-micro-blood-clots-and-block-the-spike-protein.html
11:30 PM (article continued)...
Protecting yourself from the spike protein nanoparticle (produced by vaccines) requires making daily lifestyle choices to improve the quality of your blood
In today’s Situation Update podcast, I explore how the key to preventing spike protein damage to the blood is found in protecting the quality of your blood. And that’s determined largely by what you eat.
Partially-hydrogenated vegetable oils — used to make vegetable shortening, coffee creamer and thousands of other common grocery products — are especially toxic to the blood, promoting inflammation and clotting.
Canola oil is another questionable oil that should be avoided at all costs. Replace it with authentic olive oil or avocado oil, but understand that the vast majority of those oils sold in grocery stores are counterfeit, so you have to really do your homework on the source of your dietary oils.
Consuming fried foods also contributes to “sludge blood” — blood clotting of the red blood cells. The acrylamides in fried carbohydrates cause severe damage to vascular cell lining.
Consuming homogenized, pasteurized milk is also harmful to vascular health. The homogenization process artificially alters milk fats to make them stay in suspension. This also causes them to promote inflammation, stagnation and even constipation in some people. If you enjoy drinking milk from cows, get raw, fresh milk that hasn’t been subjected to homogenization.
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/18202/eu-alliance-conservatives-populists
There is a whole lot going on in Europe too....
Why Ivermectin was Disappeared
By Henry F. Smith Jr., MD
"It’s a common occurrence in winter. A patient calls a primary physician to report a nonproductive cough, slight hoarseness, muscle aches, and a low-grade fever. The physician, and likely the patient, realize that this is almost certainly a viral upper respiratory infection. If the patient were in the office, the physician may test for a streptococcal bacterial infection, but it will likely be negative."
"This is probably an infection with a rhinovirus, adenovirus, or endemic coronavirus. Despite this, the afflicted patient will happily proceed to the pharmacy to pick up their prescription for an antibiotic. The patient will feel as though the physician was proactive, something the doctor certainly understands."
"This prescription, however, will be of no value to the patient and may actually cause issues. Yet pharmacies in the U.S. see this type of prescription thousands of times a day."
"It occurs despite the fact that physicians are constantly reminded that gratuitous antibiotic prescriptions come with side effects and can lead to antibiotic resistance. Beyond that, there is no tangible resistance to this practice from the medical establishment or healthcare authorities."
"Now let’s imagine another patient calls in. This patient also has a dry cough scratchy throat, muscle aches, and a low-grade fever. Only this patient had a COVID test kit at home and tested positive. The physician wants to prescribe a medication with no risk of bacterial resistance and a very benign side-effect profile. He’s read lots of literature to suggest it will be helpful. There are a significant number of double-blind studies showing it to be effective in the treatment of SARS Co-V2. It has been used in multiple countries with excellent results. Except, in this case, the physician will find it impossible to prescribe that medication. It will be impossible because that medication is Ivermectin. And somehow it has been removed from the market."
"Not only has this FDA-approved, Nobel prize-winning drug been made unavailable, if a physician were to prescribe it, or advocate it as therapy, they are threatened with the potential loss of their medical license, their hospital affiliations, and their board certification."
Read the entire article here:
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/02/why_ivermectin_was_disappeared.html
NEVER donate to the left wing GoFundMe site (exclusions may apply, as in the case of "X," a left wing, Death Cult Democrat supporting radical):
GoFundMe shuts down the Canadian truckers' fund
By Andrea Widburg
Read the entire article here:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/02/gofundme_shuts_down_the_canadian_truckers_fund.html
"GoFundMe, a site that holds itself out as the go-to place for online fundraising, just shut down the Convoy 2022 Fundraiser, which had passed $9,000,000 (Canadian). The same organization that funded the violent and illegal Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone in Seattle, as well as myriad other violent BLM organizations, says that, once law enforcement told it that the Convey was dangerous, it was obligated to shut everything down. Adding insult to injury, GoFundMe is refusing to return the money donated, which runs directly counter to its "GoFundMe Guarantee."
"To give context to just how awful GoFundMe's behavior is, here are a few facts. To begin with, this is not the first time GoFundMe has yanked the rug out from under conservative fundraisers. It's a sign of the truckers' political naïveté that they didn't go straight to GiveSendGo, a Christian-based online fundraising site."
38,983 Deaths and 3,530,362 Injuries Following COVID Shots in European Database as Mass Funeral for Children who Died After Pfizer Vaccine Held in Switzerland
"The European (EEA and non-EEA countries) database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, verified by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and they are now reporting 38,983 fatalities, and 3,530,362 injuries following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots. From the total of injuries recorded, almost half of them (1,672,872 ) are serious injuries. On January 29, 2021 a mass funeral protest for children who have died after receiving a Pfizer vaccine was held in Geneva, Switzerland. Someone recorded the event and made a short video."
https://healthimpactnews.com/
Oh, Canada ~ Is that you?
On Parliament Hill, I saw hundreds of Canadian flags and an incredibly diverse cross-section of Canadians. Imagine guys wearing hunting camo and an odd group of white Boomers trying to drum. Throw in some Sikhs, a lot of little kids all wrapped up in snowsuits and an enormous crowd of Quebecers. Imagine them standing around in delight and bemusement, looking at each other and saying, “Hello? Do I know you? Is that you, Canada?”
For the record, I did not see one Confederate flag or swastika. Middle-aged ladies were draped in Trump 2024 regalia, but they were one fewer than the three counter-protestors holding #FLUTRUCKKLAN signs. Both groups seemed to be looking for friends but hadn’t found them.
There were lots of trucks. And honking that went late into Saturday night, which, if you know Ottawa, you will understand meant it tapered off about 9:30 p.m.
We overheard conversations. One Quebecer, behind us in a vast stream waiting to join the Wellington Street crowds, said, “I never imagined I would ever feel so united to ‘les Anglos’; it is a symbiosis.”
We saw lots of signs. One teenage girl’s said: “I lost my graduation; I lost my prom; Trudeau, you lost nothing.” The police, while we wandered around, did not seem concerned or on guard. I read this morning not one arrest was made.
When I returned to the house, and my fingers had thawed, I turned to Twitter on my phone. I learned that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his family were whisked away for safety; that the CBC was speculating the Freedom Convoy was directed by Russian operatives; that a former press officer for Stephen Harper deleted her account after being hounded for tweeting that the day’s events felt like a happy Canada Day; that NDP leader Jagmeet Singh tweeted, “today Conservative MPs have endorsed a convoy led by those that claim the superiority of the white bloodline and equate Islam to a disease.”
Sunday morning, we joined a group reciting the Rosary on the Hill. The sky above Parliament was brilliant blue. The air horn noise nearly deafening. When I closed my eyes for the first decade, just a few of us were gathered. When I opened my eyes, at least 25 stood in a circle. Some joined all the prayers, some only the Our Father. Others stood quietly with us, observing and serious.
I thought of, and prayed for, two Indigenous women interviewed for a video clip earlier in the week. They were beside the road awaiting the convoy. When a reporter asked why they were in the cold with their drums, cheering for the truckers, they spoke of the divisions in their community over vaccine mandates.
They spoke of inability to access the health clinic because of vaccine status, of limits placed on travel to visit family and friends. One put her hand to her chest to steady herself and said, “We are unable to attend Round Dances in our community.” The pain in her face and voice is hard to witness.
Whatever you read about the Freedom Convoy, whatever your stance on vaccine MANDATES and passports, know this: the narrative being spun that the convoy is a fascist, white supremacist movement is a bald-faced political lie.
https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2022/02/03/i-saw-a-mob-it-wasnt-truckers/
Sales of Biden's Murderous Covid Treatment Remdesivir Soar to $5.6 Billion
(Headline actually should attribute Remdesivir to FAUCI, a fact that is well documented in RFK, Jr.'s book "The Real Anthony Fauci." Having said that, the Biden Administration is very much pushing its widespread use).
https://rairfoundation.com/sales-of-bidens-murderous-covid-treatment-remdesivir-soar-to-5-6-billion/
PS: Many knowledgeable people in the medical field refer to Remdesivir as
"Rem Death is Near." Not an exaggeration; this drug is a KILLER.
X 1:19 PM,
I haven't always disagreed with you. But maybe I should disagree with you most of the time.
I think at this point I probably don't know much, but what I do know in more depth, I can see what you do with the subject matter.
I'll return in a week or two to the topics raised by the excerpts from RFK, Jr.'s book.
X, you wrote @ 3:54 PM,
5. The idea that an EUA can only be done if no alternate therapy is available is an overly strict interpretation of the statute. The FDA director has broad discretion there to determine within the word “adequate”.
A. HQC itself initially received EUA authorization.
B. Tamaflu exists yet we have flu vaccines
C. It’s a pandemic, the gov could pursue whatever it deems viable -the idea it would suppress HQC and/or ivermectin simply because such treatments might prevent the need for vaccines is preposterous.
You’re conflating quite a number of things and mixing truth with error in the process—which is not unusual in your posts, I’ll again add.
Flu vaccines are not under EUA, so Tamiflu, or any med to treat the flu, is basically unhindered. And the flu vaccine (each season usually consisting of portions of either A or B, depending on which is forecasted to be dominant that season) is a rather typical one in its mechanism.
On the other hand, COVID19 vaccines ARE under EUA, and, as such, should a viable treatment option become available, then the EUA can be rescinded. On the latter, this is because one of the preconditions for EUA approval on these novel vaccines (mRNA) is that no other viable treatment is available.
As to your C. above, this is points to the main point of Dr. Peter McCullough’s Texas Senate testimony: Why was there no national panel convened to investigate possible early intervention treatments? Surely there was some data from Sars Cov 1 to review for possibilities. But no. Those who’d tested positive were basically told to just go home, and IF they should get really sick, go to hospital. Any doctor who took his/her promise to adhere to the Hippocratic Oath seriously would try to treat the patient in order to attempt to prevent further illness. And that’s what Dr. McCullough did.
The Lancet revealed its polluted political underpinnings when it initially ran cover for opponents to the lab leak theory. These opponents were, shall we say, not disinterested parties. At that point, the publication lost all credibility with me. This fact by itself should cast doubt on the legitimacy of their “peer review” process.
----
X @ 1:19 PM,
You wrote: Peer-review does happen all the time post-publication as others try to replicate the results.
Post-publication scrutiny is NOT “peer review”, so stop trying to cover your earlier obfuscations, whether: (a) as LIES, or (b) as complete misunderstanding, which appears rather doubtful to me from one who presents himself as possessing a doctorate, in whatever the field.
As for the rest of your post, see above response to your 3:54 PM.
I know RayB was just defending his white nationalist friends and even resorting to Roman Catholic disinformation and propaganda websites to do so but the new age nazi trucker party was way too vulgar to be referred to as a unifying Christian event.
Convoy protesters' use of Nazi symbols 'shocking in 2022': genocide expert
Public education is needed to counter misinformation, says Kyle Matthews of Concordia University's Montreal Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies
https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/genocide-expert-jewish-organizations-react-to-blatant-use-of-nazi-symbols/wcm/967006b7-6002-4481-8f79-96f7bec441a8/amp/
Excerpt:
“Jewish advocacy organizations and human-rights experts roundly condemned the blatant use of Nazi symbols during this weekend’s protests in Ottawa against COVID-19 measures.
“I was flabbergasted,” said Kyle Matthews, executive director of the Montreal Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies at Concordia University. “It is shocking in 2022 to see people openly carrying these symbols and thinking it’s okay,” he said. “Clearly there are a number of people who don’t understand what the Holocaust is about. They don’t understand that their situation is nowhere near comparable, Matthews added.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau denounced the rowdy demonstrators Monday, saying Canadians “were shocked, and frankly, disgusted by the behaviour” of protesters who placed an anti-vaccine sign on a Terry Fox statue and danced and urinated on the National War Memorial. He quoted international human-rights lawyer, McGill emeritus professor and former cabinet minister Irwin Cotler, who tweeted Saturday: “Freedom of expression, assembly, and association are cornerstones of democracy; but Nazi symbolism, racist imagery, and desecration of war memorials are not. It is an insult to memory and truth.”
X
"As to your C. above, this is points to the main point of Dr. Peter McCullough’s Texas Senate testimony: Why was there no national panel convened to investigate possible early intervention treatments? Surely there was some data from Sars Cov 1 to review for possibilities. But no. Those who’d tested positive were basically told to just go home, and IF they should get really sick, go to hospital. Any doctor who took his/her promise to adhere to the Hippocratic Oath seriously would try to treat the patient in order to attempt to prevent further illness. And that’s what Dr. McCullough did."
This paragraph is so good I wanted to highlight it.
And Doctor McCullough will forget more than the blog braggart "doc quaX" will ever know about this.
https://sharylattkisson.com/2022/02/watch-canadas-freedom-convoy-2022-explained/
Half-baked @ 3:04 PM debunked---again.
What slime pit do you inhabit to find all the worst and most rancid "news" possible that you can find?
And pick a topic, doesn't matter which, your bias is all you have.
The Truth hardly darkens your door..
Dude, either you are desperate for attention or you make a living by being a lying shill to troll incessantly.
Craig said: "On the other hand, COVID19 vaccines ARE under EUA, and, as such, should a viable treatment option become available, then the EUA can be rescinded. On the latter, this is because one of the preconditions for EUA approval on these novel vaccines (mRNA) is that no other viable treatment is available."
As I stated previously, your theory is an oversimplification and strict interpretation of a much broader rule/process/laws. It's not that simple. The FDA can drive a truck through the word "adequate" if they wanted to, especially within certain populations and a "treatment", alone, effective at some level for some populations, wouldn't have derailed a EUA of a vaccine that "may be effective" to prevent such illness, hospitalizations and mortality without any illness whatsoever and the FDA EUA's guidelines give the FDA director plenty of discretion to have allowed treatments AND vaccines (including a waiver process too) despite any such "effective" treatment or mitigating therapy UNLESS it were say 95%+ effective at preventing illness, hospitalization and mortality (I'm presuming you are not claiming any such treatment does, in fact, exist).
Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities
https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/emergency-use-authorization-medical-products-and-related-authorities#option
Section III(b)(1)(d): No Alternatives: "For FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition. A potential alternative product may be considered “unavailable” if there are insufficient supplies of the approved alternative to fully meet the emergency need. A potential alternative product may be considered "inadequate" if, for example, there are contraindicating data for special circumstances or populations (e.g., children, immunocompromised individuals, or individuals with a drug allergy), if a dosage form of an approved product is inappropriate for use in a special population (e.g., a tablet for individuals who cannot swallow pills), or if the agent is or may be resistant to approved and available alternative products.
x
p.s. - Post Publication Peer Review (PPPR) is a thing and in the days of online journals and covid moving collaboration online it is being used more and more. In the scientific community, new papers are always met with scrutiny. It's not as scrutable as an abstract, but still.
See: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/information-culture/post-publication-peer-review-everything-changes-and-everything-stays-the-same/
And, the Lancet fraud was discovered and revealed very quickly by such informal post-publication review of the research paper.
See: https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/the-lancet-alters-editorial-practices-after-surgisphere-scandal-67953
Excerpt: "University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), infectious diseases researcher Matthew Spinelli, for example, tells The Scientist in an email that he is particularly disappointed by “the lack of acknowledgement of post-publication review,” without which, he adds, “this fraud would never have been detected.
pinelli and UCSF biostatistician David Glidden were among many scientists to write letters to The Lancet with concerns about the paper within days of its publication.
Spinelli and Glidden tell The Scientist that journals should put more emphasis on the conversation that takes place after a paper is published. “A process which reflects the capabilities of modern, on-line journals would provide a record of post-publication review and would recognize the work of external reviewers,” Spinelli writes. “This process would be more accountable, fairer, and more transparent.”
Rich,
Please consider banning, or limiting lying shill troll X, to one post a week. If you choose not to, at least allow Christine to post as she wills.
X @ 5:28 PM,
You're missing the larger point of my post, which includes the paragraph after the selection you posted. Given that no national panel for possible early intervention was convened, this was a sure bet that no effective early treatment would be able to clear the hurdle required to provide a basis with which to rescind the CV19 vaccine EUA.
We had/have a single solution, a one-size-fits-all, which is still being pushed regardless of the subgroup's relative risk.
X,
Let me add this. I recall reading the specifics of the FDA EUA requirements when I saw the DarkHorse Podcast Clips vlog on this. I went to the site, and it appears to me some verbiage has been added, though I cannot state this definitively. But, this is interesting to me:
A potential alternative product may be considered “unavailable” if there are insufficient supplies of the approved alternative to fully meet the emergency need. A potential alternative product may be considered "inadequate" if, for example, there are contraindicating data for special circumstances or populations (e.g., children, immunocompromised individuals, or individuals with a drug allergy), if a dosage form of an approved product is inappropriate for use in a special population (e.g., a tablet for individuals who cannot swallow pills), or if the agent is or may be resistant to approved and available alternative products.
This 'insufficient supplies' reason is one the FDA used in its "approval" of both Pfizer's Comirnaty and Moderna's SPIKEVAX; that is, while both of these are FDA "approved" neither have sufficient quantities to distribute, thus retaining the EUAs of the original versions of Pfizer and Moderna. The confusion surrounding what may sound like 'approval', might lead some unsuspecting to assume the vaxxes at their local pharmacy are actually now FDA-approved, even though they aren't.
You don't find this a bit fishy, Dr. X? Specifically, why are these 'new' vaxxes "approved", even though we don't have 'adequate supplies to distribute'? I see this as a dishonest shell game, a bait-and-switch kinda thing. What say you?
I just did an author invite, allowing Richard Peterson to post his articles on this blogspot. If some of you have significant information and might like to post, email me and we'll discuss it.
Constance
For the record, Maurice Strong was one of the most prominent figures ever in the Envkronmental wing of the New Age Movement. He was also on the Board of Trustees of John Fetzer's Institute, had his own New Age compound in Colorado, and headed The Earth Summit United Nations Conference in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.= He also had BIG plans for active population reduction measures.
Constance
Some of my old Maurice Strong posts and I could have posted many more:
https://cumbey.blogspot.com/search?q=MAURICE+STRONG
https://cumbey.blogspot.com/search?q=curious+triangle
Sunday, October 25, 2009
"GLOBAL WARMING" HARMONICALLY CONVERGES WITH MAURICE STRONG GLOBAL SCAM
https://cumbey.blogspot.com/2010/10/earth-charter-world-economic-forum-and.html
There's more, but I'm getting to tired to keep cutting and pasting links.
Constance
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said he will investigate GoFundMe for ‘fraud’ after the site ‘commandeered $9 million’ in donations for truck drivers protesting COVID mandates in Canada
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said he will open an investigation against GoFundMe for cancelling the Freedom Convoy's fundraising page on Friday
GoFundMe had removed the page for the Canadian truckers protesting COVID mandates, which raised $9 million, and said customers must order refunds
The company added that any left over money would be given to other charities
The fundraising website received severe backlash and stated on Saturday that all the money would be refunded in 7-10 days
GoFundMe removed the page after police reported violence during the protest, which has gone on for eight days at Canada's Parliament in Ottawa
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10480407/Ron-DeSantis-said-investigate-GoFundMe-commandeering-9-million-donations.html
Craig,
1. My guess is maybe you (or Weinstein) read or were shown the summary from Section II, which as stated is explained in more detail in Section III:
".... The Commissioner may issue an EUA to allow an MCM to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by a CBRN agent when there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. Section III of this guidance addresses EUAs."
The "guidance" was published in 2017, I doubt it was changed. Maybe Brett was looking at the Act/law that the eventual guidance was promulgated from???
2. Do I find it fishy? Not really. All the EUA is new stuff. So is a legally traversing a pandemic. Big pharma probably had a hand in drafting all the legislation and it's gonna favor them to best protect themselves. Both political parties are complicit in that. That's not a conspiracy as much as it's capitalism. They are simply jumping through the bureaucratic hoops between various laws regarding EUA and regular FDA guidelines towards full approval. Based on the issues you brought up about available approved alternative treatments canceling out EUA's, it would appear to me the vaccines mfg's MAYBE need to all get "approval" together otherwise the others face EUA cancellation (including any inventory still out there under the EUA). The approval process is gonna do what it's gonna do and liability and contracts will be arranged and figured out from there.
x
X,
I think you may not understand what I'm referring to. This below is what I'm talking about. Read this carefully (I also read through the linked original FDA letter):
No FDA-Approved COVID-19 Shot Is Available
And I went to the FDA site itself after seeing the Darkhorse vlog. I didn't merely look at the info they presented (I rarely do that; I'm much more thorough typically).
Maurice Strong's mistress turned wife, Hanne Strong was a real piece of new age stardust.
"Strong Couple : ‘Mystical’ and ‘Manifester’ Team Up"
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-08-20-mn-1166-story.html
x
Craig,
I don't understand Liberty Counsel's assertion.
In my opinion, the right to refuse isn't any kind of blanket protection against any consequences for actually doing so (like a loss of a job opportunity). I think it just means the government can't or isn't by this law, authorized to hold you down and make you get vaccinated (unless you are in the military and the President orders such). The eventual inserts under full FDA approval will likely have different language but is that just because it's under a different older act and the difference is really meaningless??? People can refuse fully FDA approved vaccines too, can't they?
I could be wrong. If they file a lawsuit, perhaps I'd be more clear how these differences make a conspiratorial difference of any kind.
x
p.s. - Figures Desantos wants to provide cover for another neo-nazi protest
NWO Nazi X at 9:57 PM
So now you're hating on Canadians...
It figures that you are against regular people standing up for their freedoms.
Maybe you had an abusive childhood or something, but you are a piece of work in any case.
You have my pity.
What evidence is there that the truckers are Nazis?
10:05pm
Hypocrite
"Occupy Seattle" is bad but when Nazis and insurrectionists raid the Capitol Building and/or attempt to "occupy" and incite violence in Ottawa, Canada that's ok with you.
x
X,
Once again, you are missing the point. I'm speaking of the bait and switch. The "approval" (not under EUA) of Comirnaty and then SPIKEVAX, which essentially means nothing because neither are actually available. In the meantime the original version of each is available yet STILL EUA only. Many are confused, thinking the originals are no longer EUA only but fully FDA approved. THIS IS NOT THE CASE.
X,
I'll be more direct: The FDA is supposed to be a regulatory agency, not running interference for Big Pharma.
Where does 10:05 mention Occupy or the Capitol Building?
10:14 PM
There is nothing to equate the Canadians to BLM terrorists you support.
You have nothing to base your ASSumption on.
Nothing at all, but you need to believe that to hate them, and to hate regular people like me too.
You become more pitiful each time you post.
10:22 PM Craig,
He goes there on purpose.
He cannot be reasoned with.
He just wants occasion to use your posts to spread his poison.
I know you are getting glorified reviews and images of this trucker rally in Ottawa all over alt right infotainment but it's just a few miserable white nationalists like this leader of the truckers...
Patrick King
https://twitter.com/VestsCanada/status/1177995894408581120
You probably won't see this but counterprotesters stopped the truckers today.
Real heroes...not afraid of a little shot
https://twitter.com/TravisPrasadCTV/status/1490036436040515584
There are images of swastikas and hate speech coming out of this trucker rally all over the internet.
x
10:23 PM
Easy going guy ain't he?
Believes media rot, or just plain makes it up as he goes..all so he can hate on people.
Pure venom from NWO X because trolling is his life.
10:32 PM
Soros (and Big Gov) hires explain anything planted to make regular people out to be villains.
Occupy movements worldwide were bought and paid for by Soros.
Hm. Maybe he pays you to troll here too (and any/everywhere)..
X,
And you completely miss the point of why Constance posted the links and info about Maurice Strong. It was obviously because you had mentioned him in support of your "Climate Change" position.
“A small minority are shamefully using Nazi symbols, the Confederate flag, and misappropriating the Star of David to advance their political objectives.”
https://www.yahoo.com/now/nazi-flags-truckers-protest-152500396.html
“ An Alberta MP said he was not aware a person was flying an upside down Canadian flag with a swastika on it behind him when he gave a television interview at a protest in Ottawa on the weekend.”
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/edmonton-area-mp-under-fire-for-photo-of-him-near-flag-bearing-nazi-symbol-1.6333266
Could it be the person with the flag was making the statement that Canada has become like the Third Reich and wasn’t an advocate for that ideology?
Craig,
So what?
It doesn’t make a difference liability wise until it’s scheduled.
Maybe Trump admin signed a bad deal with vaccine companies and that’s what concerns you.
Why the delay shipping the brand drug? Probably advantageous to drug company to wait or has to do with inventory. Batches are large and they expire. Maybe there patent starts when they initiate actual sales of approved vaccine? Is it legal? Laws were probably written by them so it’s likely. Maybe they prefer the eau framework? If legality is a question maybe someone will sue them?
Also there are other vaccines in development. If there are Pfizer & moderna vaccines with full approval might that keep other vaccines (like the newer omicron vaccine) from getting fast tracked via eua approval.
Im not really seeing a conspiracy, just a bureaucracy
X
Big pharma pushes dangerous drugs. When they cross the line what restraint is left?
https://youtu.be/XCciAJJMt9Q
X,
Of course it makes a difference as regards liability!
You wrote: Maybe Trump admin signed a bad deal with vaccine companies and that’s what concerns you.
What concerns me--and should concern you--is FDA in cahoots with Big Pharma, regardless of your additional speculations here.
Craig,
I didn’t bring up or use the name Maurice Strong to support my belief that human caused climate change is real.
As an after thought I simply wondered how an adulterating oil executive fit into the narrative at all. It now sounds to me like he was more likely a pretend “environmentalist” either playing the bad guy to the white hat Fred Singer (also representing big oil psuedo-science & anti-communist ideologues) or, a just a new ager seeing an opportunity to maybe capitalize on climate change.
He was never a climate scientist and he’s deceased. So moving on.
X
X @ 11:28 PM,
I stand corrected. You didn't mention Maurice Strong.
No problem, Craig.
“Cahoots” …what do u expect after citizens united? Corporations control our government and the Roman Catholic Republican Supreme Court is never going to change that.
I thought you trusted the marketplace?
I personally don’t think supply & demand principles work in healthcare where you’ll pay your last dollar (and borrow even more dollars) to pay whatever it takes to be healthy.
Obviously for profit healthcare has some advantages and some disadvantages. When big money is at stake, citizen trust in for profit healthcare appears to disintegrate.
Not putting words in your mouth, just talking in general.
X
Meant to say… I don’t think it effects liability until the FDA schedules it (as we discussed last summer??)
Then, as I recall, liability is supported by an excise tax on each vaccine dose. Since the gov is paying for the shots already, that may mean the gov (we the people) would have to pay that $9? Extra per dose into some liability fund. If I’m right about that perhaps it’s the gov who is the one less motivated to schedule it?
X
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZB36C5BGsk
Good to hear a reasoning mind...
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/geoff-russ-the-irrational-orgy-of-hysteria-surrounding-the-trucker-convoy
If you solely read the social media posts of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s foot soldiers, you’d think the weekend protest was the maple-flavoured version of the neo-Nazi rally that took place in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017. The sight of the lone swastika was all Liberal politicians needed to have a field day.
Terry Fox’s statue was “defaced” by members of the convoy. Listening the politicians and pundits, however, you’d think it had been splashed with red paint, had its limbs hacked off and been torn from its pedestal, a fate that many other Canadian monuments have met recently.
In reality, a Canadian flag was wrapped around the statue’s neck, a hat placed on its head and a sign reading “Mandate Freedom” was put between its hands. The display was tasteless, but temporary and harmless.
Nothing less than the word “hysteria” describes the sanctioned narrative of the trucker convoy.
Being there in-person wasn’t needed to see how it really played out. Dozens of live streams were available on YouTube, which provided a good view of the hundreds of anti-vaccine stalwarts, anti-vaccine mandate activists and other protesters chanting, laughing, drinking beer and apparently having a grand old time. “Dixie” or “Die Wacht am Rhein” were nowhere to be heard on the loudspeakers. . .
For anyone who paid serious attention to Ottawa over the weekend, it was clearly not Canada’s Jan. 6 moment, but rather something of a frigid street party. That hasn’t stopped the comparisons to the storming of the United States Capitol, though.
The convoy is a ridiculous clown caravan, but its coverage has been dishonest and hysterical in equal measure.
"The convoy is a ridiculous clown caravan"
They are serious as a heart attack, (as serious as a heart attack from a clotshot) their money where their mouth is, and they are not pillaging and burning, not harming life and property. They are an annoyance and discomfort to some---the some who probably need to learn something about the real people who get real things done to keep an entire country alfoat........and it isn't the politicians!!!
Go bless the blue collars, the everyday people who are fed up with the rip off of out-of-control control freak leaders who govern to benefit themselves only not the public they are sworn to serve.
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/freedom-convoy-sashas-story/
Fantastic.
Xcellent post 5:17 PM!
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/joe-rogan-apologizes-for-n-word-video/
There's Joe and then there's X's hero.......
And now the scientific evidence from the obvious department....
Effectiveness of Face Mask or Respirator Use in Indoor Public Settings for Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 Infection — California, February–December 2021
February 4, 2022
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7106e1.htm
Summary:
Wearing an N95/KN95 respirator made you 83% less likely to test positive than no mask.
Wearing a surgical mask provided 66% less likely to test positive than no mask.
Even wearing a cloth mask appears to provide 56% lower adjusted odds of a positive covid test compared with never wearing a face covering.
x
Nobody cares.
Just wear your face diaper and shut up X.
Since you are tone deaf and obtuse--repeat: Nobody cares.
X,
Put a clothes pin on your nose, and duct tape over your mouth. That will help all of us stay well.
Another perspective:
New CDC Mask study | Full of Errors | But many RTs | Science credibility dies slowly | Reflections
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
Vinay Prasad, MD MPH; Physician & Associate Professor
10:56 PM
And the junk dealer at 9:27 PM won't listen to you either.
Masks (that the most of us have access to) don't work against an aerosol..
That won't stop x and his junk science mantra though.
He needs a clue...and a life.
Masks have worked as well as the vaccines have.
;)
Please, someone here, use the word 'niggardly' in a sentence.
I wish to see if the administration deletes such a post.
x
10:18 said "Masks (that the most of us have access to) don't work against an aerosol"
There has been "access" to good masks for a long time now.
KN95 masks are only around $1 a piece on Amazon. They are also available at Home Depot.
My wife and our employees preferred the KN94 Korean masks. Just a lot more comfortable with similar protection and they are available for around $.50 per item on Amazon.
x
Craig (and others)
With Omicron, I don't see masks helping nearly as much as they did but I'd like to see them remain on public transit and indoor public spaces.
I think Dr. Prassad brings up some good points about the limitations of the data but some of those items he complained about weren't completely toxic to the underlying data. Sure there were lower IQ people in the test group that were unvaccinated but there wasn't zero unvaccinated in the control group. With the results appear to me to be confirming beyond any bias in the data.
Dr. Prassad's criticisms do demonstrate how hard completely clean data in this area of epidemiology is to come by.
Hindsight is 20:20 but from the get-go the CDC maybe could have put something like maybe 1 or 2 of 5-10 random questions on the back of every vaccination card and/or covid test kit asking a simple question like:
1. Do you wear a Mask in public? A. Always B. Most Always C. Usually D. Sometimes E. Almost Never F. Never
2. When wearing a mask, what type mask do you wear? abcdef
I'm not certain what to ask but over time changes to those responses and regionality, demographics, etc might have given us big enough data to really KNOW a few things.
Until then, I get criticism for focusing on death rates but I figure it's the most reliable numbers because it's hard to hide dead bodies, even in states without rigorous health care standards, like Idaho (where case numbers are MUCH lower than their covid death rate which means either they are just dying more from Covid OR just not testing and not seeing cases until they come to the hospital dying).
For example, look for yourself at dan goods covid dashboard where he analyzes Covid deaths per million in varying levels of vaccinated states since June 2021 when the political divide really started on vaccines.
https://dangoodspeed.com/covid/total-deaths-since-june-2021
There are 12 territories on that list, WA, RH, CA, DC, HI, IL, NV, NM, NY, OR, CT and Puerto Rico, that have had "Mask Mandates" a long time. When I combine their collective rates of covid deaths per million I get an average of 599/death per million since June 2021. Compare that with the other 39 states/territories on the list with an average of 1,025 covid deaths/million since June 2021. Mask mandate states have nearly half the death RATE.
That differences surely aren't all explained by vaccine rates and it's not just dumb luck. But there are anomalies in these numbers that could be cherry-picked to death. For example, NV and NM have above-average numbers and Utah, though still largely unvaccinated and absent a mask mandate has had relative success keeping Covid death rates low (though in Utah the Mormon church requires masks in all their temples).
That said, none of us would be OK getting surgery and having our doctors not scrub in and wearing a mask during our procedures nor has anyone suggested that mask mandates in hospitals inundated with covid patients are ridiculous.
Politics aside, it's just common sense that masks help prevent the spread of viruses and bacteria.
x
"KN95 masks are only around $1 a piece on Amazon. They are also available at Home Depot, but my NIGGARDLY wife refused to purchase them."
X
X,
Why would you need a mask? Doesn't you magic shot protect you?
Niggardly.
I posted something on how the general population, with Mass media brainwashing, has idolized, and view doctors as little gods. It did post, but disappeared. Was late morning yesterday. Gone?
Is X deleting our posts now? Yes, he deletes them NIGGARDLY.
Where I live whenever I see some people donning their masks in the cold air and see the plumes of vapor coming out of them (and yes they are KN95 masks I observed) I know how ineffective they are against a microscopic aerosol transmission of covid and all of it's variants, that all need to be named like pets or something, because junk "science" is so proud of what they created.
Trust your information? No thanks global slave x. Bow your knee and lick the toes of elites all you want, but I will keep my choice not to.
Please send your checks for the masks to:
X Cuckold
4560 Imperial Fascist Way
NY, NY 10023
Don't be so niggardly with your stamps. Your check should be heavy.
Do his masks have two lateral holes?
Two for each side his bone through the nose will go.
"I posted something on how the general population, with Mass media brainwashing, has idolized, and view doctors as little gods. It did post, but disappeared. Was late morning yesterday. Gone?"
This only happens to me when there is just one sometimes random word in a post that violates the profanity and/or troll filter.
Even if it's in a bible verse, like the word pro --- sti ---. tute.
The post will appear immediately to me to have posted and I can seemingly read it in its entered position but when you refresh or revisit the blog it's just not there.
Usually, I try to click back and the post will reappear as a draft. I will then "copy and paste" it into another tab on this blog where I then check it for offending words and try to get it to take up properly. If you just misspell or add punctuation to any words that MIGHT be offensive -- it'll go through and still hold its original meaning.
x
p.s. - Obviously the Luciferian troll has been triggered and is now posting pretending to me. I know it's obvious but just making sure all are aware.
FOR THE RECORD:
I'm a Republican Precinct Delegate, duly elected, for my neighborhood. I didn't condemn ALL Republicans, but these days. I support financially and otherwise good and loyal Republicans like Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, Mitt Romney, Fred Upton (R-Michigan), Rep. Meijer (R-Michigan), Senator Mitch McConnell, the Secretary of State of Georgia, former Governor Kasich of Ohio, Vice President Mike Pence and all the others courageous enough post 1-6-2021 to stand up and say, "But, he isn't wearing anything."
For all those who maintain that 1-6-2021 and its Capitol riot was "legitimate political discourse," you need to find Jesus for real and repent.
Constance
Further, for the record, I do not support the Canada Truck Convoy Movement either. It is New Age anarchism in practice!
Constance
Would that be your liberal Luke warm NA Nazi Jesus? Or the Jesus real Republicans serve?
Constance and X. Birds of a feather!
But nooooo you say! Hah
My Jesus does not belong to Qanon. Maybe your "Christ" does?? My Jesus wouldn't have been involved in the 1-6-2021 Capitol riot and scream "hang Pence."
Sorry about yours.
Constance
There are no Qanon followers here.
Was the first inserection, with ensuring genocide more to your liking? O ye of zero relevance?
Of course Jesus wouldn't have been involved in Jan 6.
Would Jesus have taken part in the American revolution? Would He have been ok with that?
Don't worry Constance your Republican favorites will do the right thing and not help Klaus Schwab.
In your dreams......
Now you are on the side of globalists and against everyday Canadians, Constance???
Trudeau and his government are globalists.
Surely you know that....
Fauci whispers to X (under the silk sheets): "I hope you have protection."
UPDATE: Man Who Rammed Car into Winnipeg Freedom Convoy Protesters is Antifa Activist David Zegarac
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/update-man-rammed-car-winnipeg-freedom-convoy-protesters-antifa-activist/
Of Course Fidel Castro is Justin Trudeau's Dad. No One Has Debunked Anything
https://medium.com/@leibowitt/of-course-fidel-castro-is-justin-trudeaus-dad-nobody-has-debunked-anything-4db6fc8a9042
Fact-Checking 4 Claims From Biden's Harris Jan. 6 Speeches
https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/01/06/fact-checking-4-claims-from-bidens-harris-jan-6-speeches/
Dangerous freedom or safe slavery are today's choices.
Which by the way, is the way the world has always operated in some form or fashion.
The world has been under global control before, but that is coming around the bend again, for one last time. There is no savior among the world's leaders..none, there is none to secure us, but God Himself. We see this global hammer coming down on the horizon. It is a fact of our lives now, gaining ground every day..
The elites, the globalists and their "professionals", believe you need their "velvet chains" rather than live by the grace of God in a world that is still a mixed bag of choices of good or evil that we must grapple with. According to them, they have a pre-prescribed way, "best way", that is better than the world has ever seen to date, because they have over time gained an upper hand in the affairs of this world--hidden in plain sight for a long time, but now ready to show the entire world what they have been working on to "fix" the planet, to "fix" you! They have the means to do it..and much of the the world's people permission for this too. Their "science" and "education" is your "ticket" to a good life. They are making a full appeal, looking for takers, willingly, or if needed, and they are ready for it, by force.
They are the "peace and safety crowd", the experts (according to them) dangling various carrots on sticks so you will choose their system--of justice, of health, of peace, of safety, of religion, of the future for you personally and your family.....for the earth itself.
They are the devil's team. Slick, over -produced, over-achievers with billions to ply you with and media lapdogs to hound you into complying. Big ideas and big technology to rope you into their system.
We either live for this world (and ourselves) or we live and move and have our being in the One Who made heaven and earth, and us, and this is really how this shakes out in the end. The earth is groaning under the weight of the evil that the prince of the power of the air reigns in and there is only one eternally safe way out.
The Lord lays before us the way of life, or the way of death, His Word is plain spoken and immutable. This world is Sodom, Gomorrah, headed for destruction in real time, this is the reality staring us all in the face, increasing, headed straight for evil continually, how it is to be until vanquished by the Almighty. And the only safe exit (and always has been) is Jesus God's Son. From Old Testament to New, He, was and is, the Only Lord. Life as God meant it is not here anyway. Choose with that in mind.
Dangerous freedom, where the grace of God for this world is, has been, yes, indeed, this chapter is closing, His hedge of protection is lifting off of the world, so this has been, and may still be for a short time yet--who really knows but God--it is looking less likely with each passing day, so under that grace is the mixed bag where God, if trusted, will help you and I navigate the mine field of choices---but......if choosing safe slavery to this temporary world and it's benefactors---who are not for you, or your family, but for themselves...doing the devil's bidding, you will be left to blame yourself as the Lord has given ample opportunity.
God will get His Glory either way because He has no rival, all is under His Sovereign Hand..but we have a free will so be careful choosing. God has nothing to lose, but you, what loss will you suffer apart from Him if you settle for this world?
There is no shortfall falling headlong into God's Plan.
Ian Miller digs into the data. He has a great running commentary about various COVID public health interventions at https://ianmsc.substack.com/ He has even written a book called, Unmasked: The Global Failure of Covid Mask Mandates.
This article about masks is one of his latest. First, he notes that the CDC acknowledges that it included a result that is not statistically significant. Second, he points out that the CDC relied upon self-reported data. Third, he critiques the small sample size. He gets into other more nuanced topics that make my eyes glaze over, but data or statistics nerds may find it useful.
The CDC's Latest Study on Masks is Purposeful Misinformation
https://ianmsc.substack.com/p/the-cdcs-latest-study-on-masks-is
Masking people proved as effective as vaxxing them too.
I know several people who got covid after their vaccination.
One couple, personal friends, both highly experienced nurses, took every precaution and then some, are double vaxxed and have had covid twice since doing so.
Natural immunity will not be bested by this man-made attempt to curb, slow, or stop viral infection.
Using common sense, good hygiene, stay home, stay out of the public for a duration and take care of yourself if you become sick...but going to the lengths the so-called experts tell us to, is bogus, and all about compliance. That is the end game.
Those "experts" who censored others in the field who disagreed with them, have mostly nothing to help us, and put themselves squarely in the way of other effective treatments besides.
What a morass and confused tangle a large share of the medical world has become these days.
And has touched and ruined so much in it's wake too.
They wouldn't get away with it if people did not let them but they are sacred cows for the most part to many today. And the tip of the iceberg.
Sad, sad....SAD!
Well, I freely confess that my knowledge of science an math fall well below where I would like it to be -- I've been trying all of my adult life to remediate my knowledge of both; HOWEVER, that being said, I have to wonder out loud why some of the craziest people I have met are so insistent that vaccines are not needed if there is a "cure" for Covid in the form of Ivermectin and/or hydroxychloroquine.
Rightly or wrongly, I'm smelling Trump cult and/or Qanon influences on them.
Constance
The ALIEN agenda to exterminate humanity was disclosed in 1995
Video...
https://www.brighteon.com/27e3d32f-1886-44a0-8cb8-794ea0bd1980
Yes, 1:01 PM, I was stuck in anxiety and confusion on the topic of vaccines for a while. It was just hard for me to believe science could be so corrupted. I personally needed to understand the documented proof of the extent of the corruption.
On that note, I wanted to share some better excerpt about COVID vaccines from the RFK, Jr. book. I've truncated it so it's just a numbered list, but in the book, each listed item has details after it:
Dr. Fauci must have recognized that since vaccine makers had immunity from liability [which he had helped arrange] and were playing, as it were, with house money [which he diverted to them through NIH], these companies had little incentive to invest in the kind of long-term studies necessary to eliminate the pathogenic priming hazard. In retrospect, it seems that Dr. Fauci and his confederates had at least six strategies for dealing with this grim risk. All six tactics involved hiding the evidence of ADE if it did occur. I'm just going to provide the numbered list, but the book contains more detail after each numbered item:
1) Dr. Fauci's first approach was to abort the three-year clinical trials at six months and then vaccinate the controls -- a preemption that would prevent detection of long-term injuries, including pathogenic priming.
2) Second, as COVID czar, Dr. Fauci stubbornly refused to fix HHS's designed-to-fail vaccine injury surveillance system (VAERS), which systematically suppresses reporting of most vaccine injuries.
3) Third, Dr. Fauci's trump card was his capacity to enlist mainstream and social media companies to make reporting of injuries and deaths disappear from the airwaves, newspapers and the Internet, and therefore from the public consciousness.
4) Fourth, Dr. Fauci allowed CDC to discourage autopsies in deaths following vaccination.
5) Fifth, Dr. Fauci populated the key FDA and CDC committees with NIAID, NIH, and Gates Foundation grantees and loyalists to insure rubber-stamp approvals for his mRNA vaccines, without any long-term injury studies.
6) Sixth, by vaccinated the entire population, Dr. Fauci seems to be striving to eliminate the control group, to hide vaccine injuries.
Constance 1:26 PM,
I think COVID skepticism can possibly be a gateway drug to QAnon for some people, but personally I would not want to shove them through the gate too quickly.
I think it's a case of false alternatives, "woke" vs. "QAnon/Trump cult of personality."
Could we actually be helping the NWO if we are too quick to divide people into the two herds of "woke" vs. "QAnon/Trump cult?"
As far as RFK, Dr. Mikovits, David Icke, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and many of the other prominent anti-vaxxers, I have to be suspicious of their position, too, given these links to their "Academy of Divine Knowledge." Looks more than a little New Age "consciousness" to me.
https://www.facebook.com/DrChristianeNorthrup/photos/a.10150171017490029/10165050248920029/?type=3
https://unifyd.com/rfk-jr-and-jason-shurka/
To 9:22
Do you think your Canadian friends are not globalists and participating in their own form of pernicious globalism -- anarchy, chaos, and death? Wake up! As I recall my Scriptures: "They overcame the beast by the blood of the Lamb, and the word of their testimony and they loved not their lives unto the death."
Sorry, but I don't see any of that in the Canadian (USA financed movement which is causing much suffering both in Canada and the USA. I don't like mandatory vaccines either, even though I think getting vaccinated in the light of this horrible disease is prudent and necessary. I recently lost a beloved brother-in-law to the disease. Our next door neighbor is still recovering with scarred lungs from it, was hospitalized for a few days and said he thought he was dead or dying for several weeks. Several of my anti-vax friends (him included) have come down with it and have now changed their tunes vis a vis vaccination.
Antics such as the "Freedom Convoy" and super-spreader no vaccine, no mask parties can only serve to hasten public sentiment against us that will lead to what was prophesied in Matthew 24, Book of Daniel, and the Book of Revelation.
Constance
Constance
J,
1. Criticizing a study doesn't make it untrue, misinformation or fraudulent.
2. Yes, questionnaire studies have issues
3. The number of "no masks ever" population was always going to be quite small in a big isolated state (not a lot of people going in an out of border towns as compared to other states) that has a had a mask mandate throughout the pandemic.
4. If test subjects felt pressured to overstate mask wearing that would have occurred in both the positive and negative group and minimized the effectiveness of masking results, right?
5. It wasn't really that small a study. The criticism tries to make it small by focusing on subsets within the cohort, however, the researchers attempted 28,000 phone calls and got questions answered from 1,538 people that tested positive and 1,511 who tested negative.
6. The study says what it says. The critique may not like it but the critique isn't alleging fraud. The numbers point to masks being effective and all disclosures are made in full.
7. His rebuttal "science" is actual misinformation. If Berlin were in the US it would be in the same group as Vermont and Hawii as having the lowest covid death rates in the US. My unscientific guess would be that masks wearing also reduces viral loading which would then reduce covid severity population wide. Not surprised to see Berlin and Bavaria perform better mortality wise after instituting a N95 mask mandate.
8. Again - the critique of the OBVIOUS study that no one should really need to do is testament to how easy it is for grifters and ideologues to lie to you and fabricate data. Craig pointed to a blogger the other day where the vaccinated mortality subset had one single death and the blogger tried to use that data point to make an overall argument the vaccines weren't saving lives (or whatever - I just rolled my eyes and didn't commit it to memory). In other words, where's this level of scrutiny on the things alt right complete fabrications?
x
Hi Constance.
To be honest I (1:01 PM) have actually seen crazies on both sides of the issue.
In my family we have both unvaccinated and vaccinated, and not one of us is causing the least bit of trouble for the other, others can do as they feel led just as I do, and we are all fine with that.
I am against mandating this health issue, not against vaccination as a general health choice per say, though I find much highly problematic with the whole issue surrounding Covid. Much is problematic to me of the response from the powers that be--from pot to kettle. I still believe the best approach was what the Great Barrington Declaration and it's many doctors and scientists (who were censored and disparaged by Fauci etc) who found what I believe to be the best way to tackle it and noting that they believed the "cure" became worse for the public than the virus itself.
And I can only speak for myself, but can tell you that former President Trump nor QAnon have had one ounce of influence on my decision to remain unvaccinated. I have had Covid, yes, I got sick, though regular flu from years ago made me sicker quite frankly, but it outlasted what regular flu did by prolonged sinus issue (my lungs stayed clear the entire time) and cough, plus exhaustion which lasted weeks. I stayed home and out of pocket for a while. I recovered well and have natural immunity now.
The vaccine would harm that natural immunity in my understanding from my searches and reading on this topic.
I think you take that too far to make that blanket statement of motivation for an unvaccinated stance.
The Bible says God gave us the fruit of plants for food and the green leaves of plants for healing.
If somebody who belongs to the Academy of Divine Knowledge touts an herb for treating a condition, does that make herbalism Luciferian?
Companies like Merck study herbs to isolate the chemical compounds in them and create new drugs. They get taxpayer money through the NIH to fund the studies. Then they sell the drugs at an inflated price.
The Bible tells me the love of money is the root of evil.
Are we going to give the Medical Industrial Complex blind faith just because it stands opposed to the Academy of Divine Knowledge? Doesn't it mean anything when bribery is legalized and called a "public-private partnership?"
This is one more instance of a false alternative. Either trust the New Agers or trust the public-private partnerships like the Medical Industrial Complex that are engaged in the worship of money. No, we can and should do neither, actually.
P.S. I think most of us here probably disagree more about what we perceive to be the facts, than we disagree about values. The problem of disagreeing about the perceived facts is directly related to the problem of disagreeing about the trustworthiness of the sources that report the facts.
J,
The not so "great" Barrington Declaration is what many red states in the deep south tried to some extent absent any of the "focused protections of the elderly" the professors who created it thought we should focus on. I mean if people won't take a shot to cut their risk by 90+% it's not like anyone could ask or require older Americans to simply continue locking themselves away and let the young people just carry on as usual.
The GBD came out in October 2020, before the big 2nd wave and long before the Delta variant. It was hindsight enough by October to see that the initial reaction to the Alpha variant was too much too early but they had no way at that point of anticipating another 800,000 or so US deaths thereafter.
Had Trump won and advocated anything like the GBD whereby we look toward herd immunity via infection without using the mRNA vaccines we'd be approaching 2,000,000 US covid deaths right now. It would've been a much bigger disaster than it already was in Florida, Texas, Lousiana, Alabama and Mississippi.
The GBD did have some epidemiologists but the authors were extremely short on facts, data and evidence. They were largely made up of professors just guessing and sharing their unscientific opinions.
x
p.s. - I'm guessing conservatively that over 99% of everyone that got vaccinated did so voluntarily. It's not like the mandates made all that many get vaccinated entirely against their will. Many may be pretending now for political purposes but no one needs any particular job that bad that if they truly believed it was unhealthy for them, they'd do it anyway just to keep such job.
"Many may be pretending now for political purposes but no one needs any particular job that bad that if they truly believed it was unhealthy for them, they'd do it anyway just to keep such job."
For many it may have been the choice of making their mortgage payments each month or losing their jobs. That doesn't seem so political, does it?
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/11/majority-of-americans-are-living-paycheck-to-paycheck-since-covid-hit.html
J 4:20 PM
Yeah, blog world.
I think you are right. The choices in a fallen world are going to be tainted somewhere. Pick your poison so to speak and that is just life period. Certainly some perhaps worse than others in all likelihood. Bias generally abounds in extremes so we do have to be careful with our sources. I do appreciate your thoroughness as you strive toward that J (and some select others too). There is no perfect world in this earthly realm so I think we have to go by the discernment and wisdom that God gives and like you I try (James 1:5)...and most won't, but I don't answer for them so that isn't even my business anyway. To each their own I suppose.
But in all honesty, another part of blog world in forums such as this is the admix of those who are touting narratives (actually trolling) to push discussion out of bounds and affix blame and motivations where this is not even the place to do that, can't possibly be done correctly, resorting to hearsay and gossip, and why x most especially, in his bulldoze of issues by blatant manipulations here (he's been caught by the short hairs many times that way). To try to attribute motives and values one only perceives, presumes, and gets quite wrong frankly as others can attest (like done to you too), all while being a real jerk besides, is not helpful. So there's that......
Definitely emotionally charged issues for these times we are in--and I don't see that getting better either.
And then upon occasion Constance tries the same thing..??..a bit too pointed with nothing to go on to direct things personally-------staying general not personal lets things come across as a warning, not accusation)
And that's too bad..
"The GBD did have some epidemiologists but the authors were extremely short on facts, data and evidence. They were largely made up of professors just guessing and sharing their unscientific opinions."
Says one with no expertise himself--except perhaps picking his nose.
5:14 PM,
Thank you for your kind words about me. I appreciate your steadfast heart and wisdom.
X has come more into focus for me recently.
Right now I don't have much personal bandwidth (brainwaves, time or energy).
Therefore I just say my piece and let him say his without responding anymore most of the time. People can make up their own minds.
5:16 pm
That's the thing about hindsight. I don't need specific expertise NOW to look back and see what happened after these so-called experts shared their very risky, dangerous, unscientific and wrong opinions.
They were correct in that the initial lockdowns were mostly a mistake in the US but that's easy to opine to in October 2020 AFTER we really got an idea around the world that Covid was deadly but not Ebola-like deadly.
But lockdowns did work in some countries and how could anyone know in advance that culturally, it wouldn't work in the US as Florida, in particular, and Texas just opened up and exported Covid to every MAGA town around the US.
It's also not like the GBD professors could anticipate Delta and Omicron variants either. The variants could have been much worse and relying on herd immunity could've turned everything even uglier variant-wise.
x
5:14
lol - without any basis or rebutal you've been trolling my posts for months without any evidence. You name call me and claim to have caught by your pubic hairs (vulgar and it never happened) and I'm the problem here on this forum?
You really need to repent.
p.s. - the Canadian anti-Freedom convoy is not "blue collar". The Canadian Truckers union disavows them. These are a smallish group of white nationalists and other naive secessionists, new age anarchists who desire to capitalize on supply chain issues to further disrupt the supply chain. They obviously hope to cause and spread chaos, dismantling our institutions and soceity even further while inciting a race war. Since when is it a problem for a government to mandate covid vaccinations at the border? Didn't Trump shut down the Mexico border due to such? Didn't republicans gripe that illegals were being allowed to stay absent vaccination? Canada has the same right to control its border and mandate vaccinations for people that choose to cross it. Don't fall for the Fox infotainment hype.
J (part of the longer post I drafted last week and forgot about)
RFK Jr.’s over-the-top rhetoric in his book should be enough of a red flag in itself. Another fundamental problem with his argument that I just came across is that in the same time frame that Surgisphere published the fraudulent study in the Lancet they also were able to circulate an influential, but fraudulent article supporting Ivermectin.
Surgisphere Sows Confusion About Another Unproven COVID-19 Drug: The company behind a now-discredited study on hydroxychloroquine also posted a report that has been cited by Latin American governments recommending ivermectin as a possible coronavirus treatment. Clinicians there say the effects have been extremely damaging.
https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/surgisphere-sows-confusion-about-another-unproven-covid19-drug-67635
Excerpt: "One of the most influential studies on ivermectin’s effect in COVID-19 patients was a large observational study that used a database owned by Surgisphere, a now-discredited Illinois-based company founded by vascular surgeon Sapan Desai. That study, published on the preprint server SSRN in early April and updated a couple weeks later, reported a strong positive association between ivermectin treatment and COVID-19 patient survival, and has been cited in white papers and reports by Latin American health researchers and governments as evidence of the drug’s efficacy." (end excerpt)
I don't get how RFK Jr. still thinks Ivermectin has been unfairly discredited by Fauci and the “cartel.” while it's also true that Surgisphere’s fraudulent article contributed heavily towards the expansion of Ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment in Latin America. If the “cartel” is so powerful and ruthless, why did it allow that?
The simpler truth (KISS principle) is that in the midst of a rush for information and cures, a recklessly ambitious company like Surgisphere was able to deceive a number of smart people. Before long, other smart people uncovered the deception, the articles were retracted and Surgisphere was permanently discredited. The Surgisphere scandal shows both the fallibility of the humans doing science and the ability of the scientific process to ultimately correct itself.
While there can be no question that in some cases pharmaceutical companies are able to steer both the direction of research and physician clinical choices. Republicans are the ones most responsible for establishing that fact. However, in RFK Jr's strange world, a few ruthless titans are somehow pulling all the strings for profit.
Personally, I see a world in which a whole lot of mostly decent people with normal levels of self-interest are trying to do their jobs — to create medications and improve public health. People near the center of health policy decisions, like Dr. Fauci, have to sort out a lot of information and maintain awareness of the quality and motivations of their information sources. Dr. Fauci is 81 years old. He has been well compensated for decades but doesn't even get paid what the health directors in many US states make, let alone the salaries he could have made privately. It appears that he could have retired any time to a federal pension equal to roughly 80% of his salary and avoided all this mess entirely. It seems unlikely he is in his job for the money. Without putting him on a pedestal of infallibility, I trust him to exercise his judgment for the greater good and that he wasn't and won't be always right for everybody (competing interests vs community good). I expect his views to continue to evolve in good faith as the research accumulates and virus behavior continues to emerge.
x
To Constance @ 1:26 PM
Re: "I have to wonder out loud why some of the craziest people I have met are so insistent that vaccines are not needed if there is a "cure" for Covid in the form of Ivermectin and/or hydroxychloroquine... and "Rightly or wrongly, I'm smelling Trump cult and/or Qanon influences on them."
_________________________________________________________________________
The issue isn't about whether vaccines are, or are not, 'needed'. The issue is that the 'vaccines' that are being given are BIO WEAPONS... meant to HARM (not protect).
The issue is also about FORCED MANDATES!!!
One doesn't have to be proficient in science or math... to take the TIME to do research into Covid vaccines... separate from the 'controlled narrative' that the mainstream news media shoves down our throats 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
We are DISAPPOINTED that you resort to LABELING those, who speak out against the Covid vaccine, as 'Trump cult' / or 'Q-Anon influenced'.
Constance, there are many prominent doctors and scientists, who are neither Trump supporters nor Q-Anon followers, who believe that this covid 'vaccine' is a very dangerous BIO-WEAPON.
Top 10 signs that Covid vaccines are BIOWEAPONS being used for genocide and depopulation
#1. Autopsies of the Covid-vaccinated reveal billions of spike proteins throughout the vascular system, polluting vital cleansing organs and the brain.
#2. Nano-particle injections are causing myocarditis because the heart is straining to pump blood past all the microscopic “clots.”
#3. Healthy people, including athletes and military members, are dropping dead from “unidentifiable causes” within hours or days after getting the China Flu jabs.
#4. Vaccinated people are slowly and methodically losing their immune system function and suffering from antibody-dependence enhancement syndrome (ADE) and AIDS-like debilitation of white blood cells.
#5. The virus was made in a laboratory in Communist China and the vaccines are being pushed on the populace Nazi-style.
#6. Deaths from Covid-19 are still prominent among “fully vaccinated” people.
#7. Rare blood clots and aggressive cancer tumors are popping up in strange places in the Covid-vaccinated.
#8. The globalists who outwardly speak of depopulation using vaccines are the ones promoting the Covid jabs the most right now.
#9. The unvaccinated are being treated like the Jews of Nazi Germany; ostracized, blamed for everything that’s wrong, and deprived of jobs and normal living.
#10. Even the FDA and CDC admit the Covid vaccines do not keep you from catching Covid or transmitting it to others, so what’s their REAL purpose?
" You name call me and claim to have caught by your pubic hairs (vulgar and it never happened) and I'm the problem here on this forum?"
Hey x, Short hairs in my world is the short hair on the back of the neck.
Never occurred to me what you brought up!
LOL
But whatever-you being the "expert" you presume to call those "short hairs" as you see them.
You have been tagged by me, certainly others, and recently Rich of Medford let it be known that your antics are not going unnoticed.
You are like your half baked posts---dismissible--not to be taken seriously.
Post on troll....
Constance,
Do you think Jesus would advise His followers to get vaxxed?
Yes, or no?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3gP9TWz13B0B/
Canadian attorney goes to Ottawa to accurately report on the goings-on. An inversion of the 'other' media outlets, aka The Ministry of Truth:
Feb. 8 LIVE from Ottawa's Freedom Convoy 2022 - Viva on the Street
Viva Frei
---
You’re handing power the ability to shut down critique
DarkHorse Podcast Clips
Great news!
BREAKING: Vaccine passports gone at midnight in Alberta.
Pierre Poilievre
BREAKING: Vaccine passports gone at midnight in Alberta.
La liberté gagne!
Continue!
7:57 PM
LOL
Xcellent!
Constance,
You should watch the video link posted by Craig at 9:38 PM
'Your handing power the ability to shut down critique'
Your actually aiding the New Age reset by taking such a simplistic, myopic, and lazy approach to current monumental events. It borders on Idolitry! It's easy to just throw labels at people. It's what X does. I think so called 'professionals' are susceptible to this strong delusion. They(professionals),trust the mainstream narrative because professional reporters are truthful right? Professional doctors speaking truth on professional media. Just trust the science! What could go wrong?
You have a lot of knowledge of New Age, but you have gone off the rails. I'm not so sure you were ever on them?
"insistent that vaccines are not needed if there is a "cure" for Covid in the form of Ivermectin and/or hydroxychloroquine."
Just to let you know what I know first hand, my own sister with asthma used Ivermectin when she got Covid and within 4 days of first use she was breathing normally again, like there was no sign of the virus, no lingering anything. She started it within 3 days of getting sick and each day after she began to use it she improved rapidly.
Nobody I have ever heard of claims it to be a magic cure, but as a treatment, in her case, I know she was most definitely helped.
Have you have rushed to judgment on this issue?
I don't think less of you for taking the vaccine but you seem to have a pretty low opinion of those who are feeling differently about this issue by lumping them, labeling them unfairly.
10:42 PM
And since the Covid vaccines are NOT 'working' (because they are NOT 'vaccines')!!!
WHY wouldn't they want people to at least TRY Ivermectin... so they could get better???
The answer is obvious... because THEY DON'T WANT PEOPLE TO GET BETTER!!!
That, and BIG Money too!
Maybe Joe told X what short hairs are?
Question for you, Constance:
1) You label anti-Covid vaxxers 'Trump cult'?
2) Yet, it was President Trump who was pushing the Covid vaccine from 2020 on. Therefore, HOW can we anti-vaxxers be part of a 'Trump cult'... when we don't AGREE with Trump about the Covid vaccine???
Your theory MAKES NO SENSE!!!
‘Medical science didn’t change, the political science did’
Per usual, Florida Governor DeSantis nails it.
Cutting to the chase, calling out the stupid and the wrong tells me he really cares for his state..and all freedom loving people.
Yes 10:40 pm…. If only there weren’t smart educated people it would all be so obvious.
Do you not hear yourself?
X
Jab, jab, jab your babes
violently as they scream;
Niggardly, niggardly, niggardly,niggardly
Lies turn brains to cream....
Constance / Rich:
Please do something about this FILTH (e.g. the previous post today at 8:42 AM).
Thank you.
8:57 AM
Filth? Really?
@Mark Nowak
He's evidently more offended by words than the elite scum's evil against us.
What a weakling.
"Do you not hear yourself?
X
1:57 AM"
Says tone deaf "educated fool" minister of bias and bunk X.
Judge yourself, blind Pharisee.
I'm going to repeat the experience my wife & I had with COVID, along with our 'treatment' of it because I think it is vitally important for people to realize that there ARE ALTERNATIVES to these highly dubious EXPERIMENTAL 'vaccines.'
First and foremost, by the grace of God, my wife and I are longtime Christians. We are not "Q-Anon, Trump following CULT members." We are NOT "anti-vaxxers." Our attitude is that taking these 'vaccines' should be a CHOICE and not a MANDATE by any Government or employers. (By the way, RFK Jr. was falsely labeled by Constance as being "anti-vaxx." He is not. He holds to the exact same position as we do, as do the vast majority of the protesting truckers, etc. in Canada and around the world).
After much research, my wife and I made the choice not to get 'vaccinated.' We prepared ourselves for the eventuality of contracting COVID by obtaining all of the over the counter ingredients to Dr. Zelenko's 7 Day Protocol for "low risk patients." (By the way, Dr. Zelenko is an Orthodox Jew that was nominated for a Nobel Prize in his field of medicine. He is a fascinating character. His testimony (video) before the Rabbinical Court in Jerusalem is a MUST WATCH. It contains explosive information that YouTube didn't want you to see, so it banned it ... see it here:
https://rumble.com/vkrdx6-dr.-zelenko-speaks-to-a-rabbinical-court-in-jerusalem.html
(more)
Dr. Zelenko joins a very long list of extremely competent Doctors and Scientists from around the world that question the validity, and, warn of the potential dangers, regarding these EXPERIMENTAL 'vaccines.' (To the best of my knowledge, they are not "Q-Anon, Trump Cult" members. Note heavy dose of sarcasm.)
I came down with COVID before my wife. I immediately began the 7 Day Protocol and, although I was very sick for the first two days, I began to see improvement by the afternoon of the third day. By the sixth day, I had enough energy to work in my yard. I fully recovered. However, about a month later, I contracted Omicron, and using the same Protocol, I fully recovered from that as well.
My wife contracted COVID and was much sicker than I was. She too immediately went on the *7 Day Protocol. Her fever lasted for 5 days, but after if broke, she saw consistent improvement and is now, by God's grace, fully recovered.
We believe we are in a much better position now because we have developed natural immunity.
One side note; I continue to hear from a number of people that jumped on the 'vaccine' bandwagon early on, who now express regret. Just yesterday, an acquaintance told me that although they were 'vaccinated' and took "one booster," they will not be taking anymore.
Do your OWN due diligence. Decide for YOURSELF what is best. If you want to trust the 'government' as some on this blog apparently do, do so. If something bad happens to you, you will not be able to make the claim that you were not warned by myself and whole slew of intelligent, informed posters on this blog. There is no 'blood on our hands.'
* My wife extended the use of this to beyond the 7 days, and also increased some of the dosages, particularly Vitamin D-3, Zinc and Vitamin C.
lyrics by RayB, Richard
Jab, jab, jab the girls
he smiles in his dreams;
Niggardly, niggardly, niggardly,niggardly
his blood-lust is supreme.....
Canadian Conservative MP Candice Bergen takes the wimpy, effeminate Justin Trudeau to the wood shed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_TZvyQKzsQ&t=77s
What would God say about Britain's 'artificial sun' nuclear fusion reactor???
Britain's 'artificial sun' nuclear fusion reactor sets a new world record after releasing 59 MEGAJOULES of energy for five seconds – taking us closer towards 'limitless clean energy'
Britain's Joint European Torus nuclear fusion reactor has set a new world record
'Artificial sun', near Oxford, released 59 megajoules of energy for five seconds
This eclipsed the previous fusion energy record, also set by JET 25 years ago
If scientists can harness fusion power, hope is to create limitless clean energy
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-10493401/Britains-artificial-sun-nuclear-fusion-reactor-sets-new-world-record.html
Rayb,
Very cute story about a MAGA white supremacist who thinks Jan 6th was valid political discord who ignorantly and unnecessarily risked, to a much larger extent, the lives of his wife and community.
Wonder how many people you each spread Covid to and how are they all doing?
I notice not one word in your little story about quarantining and wearing a mask and the importance of such WHILE SICK.
The end does not justify the means. I noticed you weren't posting about while your wife was gravely ill. If she had died would it have been worth the risk? There had to be a day or two or three where you regretted rolling the dice with covid for political idealogical purposes. You almost killed your wife and now you're promoting the idea to strangers like you're William Wallace. Proves you can't fix stupidity.
x
Feel the fire Bunsen Burners at hand,
it holds the key to her own death....
Fauci grins but the flesh tastes so bland,
he ties the tourniquet around your neck!
lyrics by RayB, paul
Thanks for sharing RayB @ 11:08 AM.
Your experience is a lot like my own.
Good measures taken, stayed home to get good rest (no hospital for us), keeping up with hydration, and bumping up supplementation as you described is how I, and my spouse, took responsibility for our own health. It was common sense and God's wonderful grace attending us.
Fauci and CDC, the bombardment of disinformation coming from lots of media know nothings, not..repeat not, where our help came from..they have done much, much more harm than good.
RayB, pay no attention to x. The dude's mindset is filled with visions of pubic hair and insult.
Christian Pastor Artur Pawlowski arrested at home by Calgary Gestapo… (video)
(Note how many 'officers' were sent out in order to man handle this Pastor). I wonder what Constance "thinks" about this?
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/artur-pawlowski-arrested-at-home-by-calgary-gestapo/
"This is the 4th arrest in the past 6 months"
NOTE: Pawlowski gained international attention when he refused to comply with the Canadian government's draconian mandate to close all religious services, while big box stores such as Walmart and liquor stores throughout Canada remained open.
Recently, Pawlowski stated that he was on his way to help the truckers with food and spiritual needs, apparently prompting his arrest.
Rayb,
By the grace of God I'm not you, but if I were and I'd been unvaccinated and caught covid, passed it to my wife and who knows how many others, I certainly wouldn't be bragging about it acting like I was a success story risking covid unvaccinated. Instead, I'd be keeping my mouth shut in shame while watching the obituaries and, frankly, remain a little nervous about every covid death I hear about thereafter that occurred in my area or county (and beyond) after Jan, 2022 and wonder if I/we were the original unvaccinated viral host that passed it along to them via community transmission and thus, culpable by my ignorance and lack of care.
You might brag online but in real life you should be ashamed of yourselves. But I already know you don't care as long as you get to now hit the MAGA talking points and hey, if the ones you killed are black or Jewish, you'll probably be happy about it and call it a bigger success with your new age unz.com racist friends.
x
p.s. - so much for natural herd immunity if several weeks later you caught the omicron variant after just recovering from the delta variant.
There is no evidence Artur Pawlowski is a Christian at all.
Looks and sounds like a new age rebellion theology false teacher to me.
x
Anon @ 2:41 PM ...
Very glad to read that everything worked out for you and your wife, with the bonus being that you both now have "natural immunity," while X and his ilk have their immune system being constantly attacked by this EXPERIMENTAL 'vaccine.' I suppose that's the price one pays for putting their trust in Dr. Fauci, depopulation proponent Bill Gates and Big Pharma, etc.
The greatest indication that Pastor Artur Pawlowski is a true Christian is for the Death Cult supporter X to claim that he is not.
Seriously. If X didn't attack me, I would think there is something wrong with me !
Again the question needs to be asked of Constance; how is it fair to impose a limit of ONE POST PER WEEK for Christine, while allowing this lying, vicious false accuser to post without any ramifications?
Also, this question needs to be asked; does Constance AGREE with X? Is that the reason she takes no action regarding these evil posts?
X states regarding RayB:
"But I already know you don't care as long as you get to now hit the MAGA talking points and hey, if the ones you killed are black or Jewish, you'll probably be happy about it and call it a bigger success with your new age unz.com racist friends."
Again and again and again, I have challenged X to copy and paste ONE SINGLE STATEMENT made by me that indicates I am a racist. Of course, NOT ONCE has he been able to do so. Yet, here we go again. He claims that I am a racist that would be "happy" if I "KILLED" "blacks and Jews." AMAZING ! Amazing too that Constance, who knows better, sits back and does absolutely NOTHING about it!
It's this kind of thing that I had in mind when I said that I understood perfectly well why quality posters such as J and Paul decided to leave this blog.
STUDY: CensorTrack Documents Over 800 Cases of Big Tech Censoring COVID-19 Debate
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/free-speech/joseph-vazquez/2022/02/09/study-censortrack-documents-over-800-cases-big-tech
Believe everything Big Brother tells you. He will help you to believe what is right by not allowing you to see competing views. And remember; never question Big Brother. Repeat this until it becomes a part of your soul:
War is Peace, Knowledge is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength
X goes nuclear when he hears good news from people who have done well while not going along with his damnable narrative, not letting government and other poison peddlers dictate how we are to take care of ourselves, our families, being good citizens to protect freedoms that are meant for us all.
Nobody wants your hell life, bro X.
You are so poisoned your mind is leaking hazard waste, your posts reek of it.
Your junk Prez, junk politics (anti-social injustice is your calling card) junk science, junk religion, basically your junk way to human, can't handle good, actual good, because you peddle misery.
You have hell in your head streaming from your keyboard.
You have my pity.
Ray the Butcher
You have not asked me AGAIN and AGAIN to provide proof though I do recall one time and I provided it to you.
You post white nationalist anti-black propaganda ALL THE TIME. You do it so often I don't even make reference to it every time you do anymore as it's just who you are.
Paul and J didn't leave or take breaks because of me. I think your poetic roman catholic troll friend from Unz.com had a lot more to do with it.
x
Whoah, that's a lot of assumptions and accusations about RayB, X.
How do you know what he did or didn't do when he was sick? Is he responsible for telling you every detail? Do you want contact tracing information from him, too? He was just sharing that the Zelenko protocol worked for himself and his wife, in case it could help somebody else.
Vaccinated people carry a higher load of the virus in their sinuses. I'm not so sure they can't spread it. If anything, they'd be the ones more likely to be asymptomatic spreaders, unless there is something I misunderstand about how this all works.
But that's another topic for another day.
Regardless, that was way over the line to make those over-the-top accusations of RayB.
X states to RayB:
"You post white nationalist anti-black propaganda ALL THE TIME. You do it so often I don't even make reference to it every time you do anymore as it's just who you are."
X,
Then this should be easy for you being that I do this "ALL THE TIME."
COPY AND PASTE my posts, verbatim, which prove your assertion. I've asked you more than once before, and you have NEVER BEEN ABLE TO DO SO. AGAIN, copy and paste my posts that prove that I am a 'white nationalist' that is 'anti-black.'
For the rest of you, take note what Constance allows on this blog.
Rayb,
I will recommence calling out your racist posts again as you make them.
There's not a search feature here to really help me find the last time I did it or locate all your white nationalist posts.
x
p.s.- J - people like RayB killed my cousin with misinformation, not wearing masks in public despite being unvaccinated and being unvaccinated a perpetuating the virus. Just because someone vaccinated could have a break through infection and could have equal viral loads as a unvaccinated person doesn't mean, on average, they did spread it just as much. Vaccine have been demonstrated to reduce transmission and dureation and severity of the covid illness. To not be vaccinated is to be a greater risk to oneself AND others. Catching covid unvaccinated and recovering isn't the end of a story worth celebrating when you very likely passed a deadly virus on to others without taking ever safety precaution you could have to prevent such.
I have read enough of RayB's posts over the years to know he is not a white supremacist.
The problem here is X's continual antics of abuse directed towards others who do not share his political progressive ideology; his incessant bashing of the Catholic guests who post on this blog; and his overall nasty demeanor.
Thank you very much J. Coming from you, that means a lot.
X makes outlandish, totally baseless accusations against everyone that even remotely holds to a view that is different from his own. Dedicated, honest health care professionals are "quacks" and "liars" looking only to make a profit. He also has this remarkable ability to know what resides within a person's heart and mind.
For example, he harshly judges this Pastor, without ANY evidence to support his claim thusly:
"There is no evidence Artur Pawlowski is a Christian at all."
"Looks and sounds like a new age rebellion theology false teacher to me."
Amazing. Simply AMAZING.
Thank you Rich.
People that know me would laugh at any assertion of me being a racist or white nationalist. Thank you for recognizing that as well.
Cities turn to battlefields,
the deadly die are cast;
His victims rot from block to block....
until the last!
The doctor made a prophecy,
several years before....
No kids escape his punishment....
Fauci's rods of war!
lyrics by paul
RayB, Yes indeed we know what you're about - and it's not at all the smear that x leaves here.
He is a blot on this blog...but his accusations don't stick..
..to you, (to any of us). He thinks he is judge, jury, and executioner all rolled into one. He can't abide your good news of the good protocol and common sense you used to care for yourself and wife, the same thing that others have done. And you are right to share that valuable information with others--that's the good neighbor thing to do.
He is so easy to see through. It's his way or the highway.
But he's the one that needs to hit the highway.
News flash nuclear x --- you prove in your hellish bitterness that it is you that is living in bondage to some severe guilt, some deep rooted pride.
Deal with it.
God has mercy for the contrite.
"Rightly or wrongly, I'm smelling Trump cult and/or Qanon"
Constance Cumby 2022
PRICELESS!
Constance,
Are you largely in agreement with poster X regarding mainstream COVID science, and most of his sociopolitical views?
7:34
You should really submit some of your awesome lyrics to Ozzie Osbourne, if he's still alive. It could be a whole new renaissance for him. I can almost hear the over use of the tritone and the morbid, hellish dissonant progressions which come out of not knowing anything about music, that could accompany it, because your poems are perfect for his gothic/idiotic mindset.
Yeah! Bring back the seventies devil music! So cool.
X,
You wrote: ...Craig pointed to a blogger the other day where the vaccinated mortality subset had one single death and the blogger tried to use that data point to make an overall argument the vaccines weren't saving lives (or whatever - I just rolled my eyes and didn't commit it to memory). In other words, where's this level of scrutiny on the things alt right complete fabrications?
You completely misinterpreted that data and in so doing missed the point Dr. Vinay Prasad was making. His point was that with a 1 in 2 million severe disease being averted by boosting it is hardly an incentive to get a booster in the 16-39 age group.
And "alt right"? You discredit yourself with such idiotic statements.
@7.34PM
These are lyrics, not poems.
They are available on Richard's website for a fee.
Post a Comment