Mad Hatter Tea Party at Wikipedia - Through the Looking Glass

Through the Looking Glass at Wikipedia's Mad Hatter Tea Party - The "Information Age" or "The Controlled Information Age" -- You be the Judge!

I have had an exceptionally busy month as a lawyer, 'putting out fires' for various family law clients. Law basically, stripped of its TV glamor, is a profession where one assumes the migraine headaches of others while simultaneously retaining all of one's own. I've assumed many migraines while retaining each and every one of my own in the last month. Hence, its not that nothing newsworthy is happening -- but I don't have the George Soros or any other foundation backing me. Like the rest of you, I have to work. I 'quit my day job' for seven years between 1982 and 1989 to educate the world on the fundamentals of the New Age Movement.

I am working on the items I described on my comments section. I am happy to see that the section is functioning as a sort of public bulletin board for some very asute observers. I will be releasing a very heavy article very soon about a variety of compelling recent developments -- in and out of the European Union. Things are happening so fast now on so many fronts -- sometimes hard to digest it all. A referee at Oakland County's Friend of the Court used the acronym TMI to summarize it: too much information.

There are, however, other places, such as Wikipedia that purport to give information that seek to censor, manage and control the news by what they call a 'democratic process.' I for one would more accurately characterize it as a sort of gang rape. As usual, our 'very good friend, Squeakbox' is a rabid and enthusiastic participant -- and he gets away with it with a little help from his online friends. I found the following dialogue this morning on the site:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Javier_Solana



Recommendation 666 was in fact written and authored by Dr. Solana, that is as concrete of a factual fact as you can get. It is not some creation on a neoconservative baptist's website, it is on the official website of the Assembly of the WEU. To remove an edit that simply links to an official government document on the WEU's website is absolutely censorship, despite what you think was democracy. Fact isn't decided by what the majority thinks, fact is decided by fact. And the fact in this matter is, whether you like it or not, Recommendation 666 is a real government document, created by Dr. Solana, and is on the official website of the Assembly of the WEU. Simply linking that document in his entry in and of itself is completely acceptable. Anything less would be playing the dillusional game of 'lets create our own reality' - one that I'm confident you are bright enough not to play. <---unsigned comment from User:Gump
Gump, your edits to Michael Moore and Fahrenheit 9/11 1/2 show unambigously that you are a vandal and a bad faith editor. Including some practically random recommendation document just because the number gives you a thrill is unencyclopaedic and will not be tolerated by good faith editors. Based on your supposed logic, why not include recommendation 665 and recommendation 667 (or which ever other ones Solana wrote), etc.? So go away and leave it alone, or you will quickly find yourself banned...your behaviour on other pages alone is already sufficient justification. Fawcett5 14:54, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
Can Gump apologise here for his outrageous assertion about thinking he is in Nazi Germany. He is creating a very rank atmosphere here with his rash assertions, which is not conducive to a collaborative effort on this article, plus it can be construed as a personal attack against the editors of this article, SqueakBox 16:25, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
When I realised what he'd been up to on other articles, I decided to block Gump for twelve hours to give him a chance to cool off and reflect on whether he wants to contribute to Wikipedia or just vandalize and troll. --Tony SidawayTalk 16:51, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
Wow Tony, you're so brilliant, I'm so impressed with your ability to go to an admin page that does all the hard work for you. I make two edits to Michael Moore (just to see what happens) then suddenly every other logical argument I ever make afterwards is null and void. Way to divert the issue by pointing your finger at something else other than taking on the issue at hand. Thus is human nature, to point at something else when confronted directly with truth. Of course my two edits to Michael Moore were stupid (was supposed to be one, but when I hit refresh on my browser it did the same thing again), but can you think beyond that in any capacity? And Squeakbox, I have no apology for using Nazi Germany as an example, because guess what? Now that I've been 'banned' for 12 hours, been called a troll, and have only had 'then use 665 and 667' thrown at me as a defense, I'm confident that I will be now be deemed irritating enough to be banned completely for such an 'outrageous assertion' - despite my starting this entire 'truce' section on my own free will, engaging in challenging conversation, and by adding a simple link to a page on the European Union - not fundie - website. So go ahead, be a dictator and censor me right up, create your own reality, just the way you want it to be. But until then, that page exists whether you like it or not. p.s. I don't think Solana is the antichrist, and 99.9999% of people don't think so either. Recommendation 666 is highly important though, because in an 'emergency situation', all authority is handed over to ONE person....which is ironic and could serve useful to a FUTURE person in power....but whatever, that came from a fundie website right? Oh wait....it didn't. User:Gump

Pasted from <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Javier_Solana>

Now, I have facts that need summarizing and posting, but why entrust it to the Wikipedia crew? Already I find I am choosing my words carefully so as not to enflame the more self-righteous members of that instrument. (My more reckless impulse was to use the words of Jesus, "cast not thy pearls before swine.) Soon, I will be writing about on this site:

1. Javier Solana's CV portrayal of his marriage as one burdened only by his schedule when in reality (at least per the European Voice), he and his wife "called it quits" in 1995 and Solana asked his friends for help in arranging a brand new social life for him when he moved to Brussels;

2. Why does Solana seem to receive such elaborate grants of additional power just about every November 20th? What happened on November 20th that might have made it worthy of commemoration? Franco (called only by Solana and family 'The Dictator') is one likely possibility. Franco died November 20th, 1995.

3. Why did Solana, then a publicly active Marxist, have access to Spain's King Juan Carlos at least as early as May 20th, 1977, two months before Solana was elected to the Spanish parliament as a representative of the teacher's union?

As usual, your comments are welcome and solicited. Enjoy your day and as my good friend, Herb Peters says, "Stay tuned."