tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post4703592463825096976..comments2024-03-29T09:53:11.974-04:00Comments on My perspective -- What Constance thinks: Merry Christmas - Hope all survived the Ice Storm better than usConstance Cumbeyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07181096121385621574noreply@blogger.comBlogger125125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-60974149299006037082021-05-18T06:08:09.156-04:002021-05-18T06:08:09.156-04:00There are a couple of fascinating points over time...There are a couple of fascinating points over time in the following paragraphs but I don’t determine if I see them all center to heart. There is certainly some validity but I most certainly will take hold opinion until I look into it further. Good post , thanks therefore we want much more! Added onto Feed Burner in addition <a href="http://allbarefootrunninggenuine.com/" rel="nofollow">allbarefootrunninggenuine.com</a><br />allbarefootrunninggenuine.comhttp://allbarefootrunninggenuine.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-30748896057135559202014-01-01T20:42:10.738-05:002014-01-01T20:42:10.738-05:00Hi Constance, have you read any part of the Nation...Hi Constance, have you read any part of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2014 (passed on Dec. 20 2013)? There seems to be alot of fear about it giving draconian powers to the President and Government.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-24247737482780509242014-01-01T19:17:14.776-05:002014-01-01T19:17:14.776-05:00Indeed, Anon 6:20 PM, it appears to be a private b...Indeed, Anon 6:20 PM, it appears to be a private building. Yet with rents of 70,000 pounds sterling per annum for a mere suite, and I reiterate the location (between Horseguards Avenue and Whitehall Place) at the heart of where one finds the buildings of the various departments of the UK Government (with what we know about Lucis Trust and is its UN connections) is very telling indeed!<br /><br />Thank you once again for encouraging me to take another look.<br /><br />http://www.mannsmith.co.uk/SW1/London/Suite-101A,-3-Whitehall-Court/westminsterofficetolet/property.vtx?p=5222E102-4698-4905-B7D2-FDA11100DAEDInnocent Bystandernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-56346972666449850982014-01-01T18:57:38.578-05:002014-01-01T18:57:38.578-05:00Thank you anon 6:20 PM,
How careless of me! I am...Thank you anon 6:20 PM, <br /><br />How careless of me! I am not thinking clearly, due to having the flu. I meant to write: '... to advertise its address in Whitehall'!<br /><br />Still, I'd say Lucis Trust and Jack the Ripper have alot in common.<br /><br /> I have just seen the street view- very prestigious indeed, and not just the postcode. I agree more legwork is needed yet I do not think it coincidental that Lucis Trust / Press has its office bang in the heart of the Government district.Innocent Bystandernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1397695346256004432014-01-01T18:20:59.274-05:002014-01-01T18:20:59.274-05:00Hi Innocent Bystander, that is certainly a prestig...Hi Innocent Bystander, that is certainly a prestigious London address and its proximity to government is suggestive although formally it proves nothing - more legwork would need to be done to demonstrate connections. To see the location, put the UK postcode (SW1A 2EF) into<br /><br />www.streetmap.co.uk<br /><br />NB Whitechapel is a different part of London, 2-3 miles east of Whitehall, and is where Jack the Ripper operated.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-4134340277181768772014-01-01T18:10:42.434-05:002014-01-01T18:10:42.434-05:00http://www.companieslist.co.uk/00305704-lucis-trus...http://www.companieslist.co.uk/00305704-lucis-trust-limited-the<br /><br />httpp://www.companieslist.co.uk/00338727-lucis-press-limited<br /><br /><br />Even the smallest details can sometimes shock no matter how battle-hardened one thinks one is. <br /><br />I have just discovered that the office for the UK branch of Lucis Press and Lucis Trust is at Suite 54, 3 Whitehall Court, London. SW1A 2EF.<br /><br />Right by Horse Guards Parade. Whitehall is at the heart of where the British Government is located. As a Brit, I am shocked and saddened though certainly not surprised that this vile organisation (which once had its headquarters at 666 United Nations Plaza, NYC) sbould be so blatant as to advertise its address in Whitechapel.<br /><br />God help us all!<br />Innocent Bystandernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-64685523022464537402014-01-01T13:32:16.247-05:002014-01-01T13:32:16.247-05:00A very happy and joyous new year to you, Anon 9:38...A very happy and joyous new year to you, Anon 9:38 PM, <br /><br />And a very happy and joyous new year to everyone!Innocent Bystandernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-76204163015239880902014-01-01T11:43:47.268-05:002014-01-01T11:43:47.268-05:00Regimin should read regimen.
Regimin should read regimen.<br /><br />Innocent Bystandernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-64959522968243036982014-01-01T11:40:22.287-05:002014-01-01T11:40:22.287-05:00Post Scriptum (10:56 AM).
Moreover Christine, wit...Post Scriptum (10:56 AM).<br /><br />Moreover Christine, with respect, it would take a good ten years with focused, and determined singlemindedness and thoroughness of hard work to reach a level where you could hope to hold your own in a debate about physics with physicist. If you want to give him a run for his money or truly convince anybody worth their salt of something, then go away, follow the regimin, and put in the hard work. Be Berean in your enquiries, test everything thoroughly and use the formula provided. <br /><br /> If it looks New Age, such as 'ancient aliens', smells New Age, such as evidenceless supposed high-tech ancient societies or unfounded claims about faces on Mars being more than optical illusions, then you can bet your bobble hat, your woolly mittens and your thick cotton socks that it is nothing more than a load of New Age mumbo-jumbo designed to bamboozle the unsuspecting, and deceive those with itching ears by it's lies and illusions straight from the Devil himself! <br /><br />Therefore, Christine, I hope that you make the right decision and prove yourself a Christian worth her salt, for why would you want to promote lies and sow discord here? Surely such controlling and domineering behaviour is not fitting of a loving member if the Eastern Orthodox creed!Innocent Bystandernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-11932278978110742362014-01-01T10:56:48.430-05:002014-01-01T10:56:48.430-05:00Happy new year, Anon 9:36 AM!
I am sure most of ...Happy new year, Anon 9:36 AM!<br /><br /> I am sure most of us agree with Paul's spot on analysis of Christine at 2:19 PM.<br /><br />Let us hope she heeds the wise advice of Anon 6:31 PM, and humbles herself enough to bow out gracefully .<br /><br />Happy new year Christine! <br /><br />Please take time to seriously and calmly reflect upon Anon 6:31's gentle words of wisdom. I would humbly suggest you would be in a far stronger position to hold your own meritously were you to apply such advice and employ your time by thoroughly studying a given area in depth, which by and large takes AT LEAST several years! For example, study History and read PLENTY of very old history books about Illuminism and the French Revolution written around the early 1800's. Or study Babylonian & Sumerian or Meso-American archeology, and see whether your ideas about high-tech ancient civilizations holds water. Or try geology or even physics to Ph.D level, so you can truly hold your own and express clear arguments which would then be difficult for even our Res. Phys. to refute! <br /><br />Do take such advice humbly and heartily, do the Christian thing, and leave this blog (even for your own sake; why waste your time?). Yes, go away and build a reputation for yourself, build up your own blog and look to educate yourself wisely and thoroughly.<br /><br /> All the best in choosing the right decision: The meek shall inherit the Earth!<br />Innocent Bystandernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-69499225345443126582014-01-01T09:38:41.379-05:002014-01-01T09:38:41.379-05:00I wish a very HAPPY & HEALTHY NEW YEAR to all ...I wish a very HAPPY & HEALTHY NEW YEAR to all of you!!!<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-11536788665739266712014-01-01T09:36:49.275-05:002014-01-01T09:36:49.275-05:00To Paul at 2:19 PM:
I completely agree with your ...To Paul at 2:19 PM:<br /><br />I completely agree with your very accurate assessment of Christine!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-36531015933938225002013-12-31T22:40:17.355-05:002013-12-31T22:40:17.355-05:00May God bless all here richly in 2014. May He humb...May God bless all here richly in 2014. May He humble where necessary and build up where needed!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-17318234908909183762013-12-31T18:31:21.682-05:002013-12-31T18:31:21.682-05:00Christine. Since you are so interested in helping ...Christine. Since you are so interested in helping to get the message out about the dangers of the new age wouldn't it be better to bow out graciously here and let your own blog build up it's on credibility on the merits of what you find? That would hush your critics here and lighten the load on this blog while providing another good place to for real useable material to fight the good fight against the new age. The word will get out and your credibility will skyrocket. <br />If you cannot do this for the sake of getting the truth out, then you have shown your hand and prove yourself someone who is here to create static and distort the truth. And if the weight of your research does not hold up then it is because it was all built on a false premise anyway.<br />Let the truth be served and you and I be only servants to it's high calling. To let this continue this way in making yourself an issue here will prove you do not serve the truth and actually an enemy to it.<br />Be honest, which way will you let it be? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-56300428367991855072013-12-31T17:39:04.552-05:002013-12-31T17:39:04.552-05:00On this night in 1862 a lot of people didn't b...On this night in 1862 a lot of people didn't believe that the Emancipation Proclamation was actually going to take effect the next day.<br /><br />Happy Watch Night everyone <br />paulnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-56612673166453440752013-12-31T16:11:19.035-05:002013-12-31T16:11:19.035-05:00"Physicist, I did not miss the point of analo..."Physicist, I did not miss the point of analogy rather, that it is not a good enough analogy."<br /><br />I gave you an analogy because I believe that that you do not know enough physics for the full technical explanation. But as you reject the analogy, please read the three volumes of Nobel laureate Steven Weinberg's excellent exposition "The quantum theory of fields". If you don't understand any of the mathematical details, do let me know.<br /><br />Physicist<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-70429187344767938862013-12-31T15:54:54.299-05:002013-12-31T15:54:54.299-05:00Dear Constance
Christine Erikson has made seven p...Dear Constance<br /><br />Christine Erikson has made seven posts here in the last 240 minutes. She has failed repeatedly to comply with your very reasonable request that she restrict herself to one post per 24 hours. She also calls people diarrhea-sodden monkeys and swine, which makes this blog toxic to those who wish to discuss New Age. Will you take action, please?<br /><br />AnonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-90523431763324726662013-12-31T15:53:47.968-05:002013-12-31T15:53:47.968-05:00"Physicist, I did not miss the point of analo..."Physicist, I did not miss the point of analogy rather, that it is not a good enough analogy."<br /><br />Good enough for what? It's not changed your mind, Christine, but that depends on you as well as me.<br /><br />"And no such thing as "alternative physics"..."<br /><br />Well YOU used the term without explaining what you meant.<br /><br />It took me years to learn physics to research level, you cannot hope to get there by reading a few books containing anomalous results that have never been reliably reproduced and don't give any of the mathematical details. Show a little respect to Him who ordained the laws of physics and made us enough like Him to understand them, but also so much less intelligent that it takes years of intensive study simply to follow in His tracks.<br /><br />Physicist<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-39182139403537713122013-12-31T15:43:44.966-05:002013-12-31T15:43:44.966-05:00Christine, I see you have DELIBERATELY ignored Pau...Christine, I see you have DELIBERATELY ignored Paul's exposure of you, YOU DEVIL! However, I cannot in all honesty make a distinction as Paul has at 2:19 PM, to me you are both a card carrying sociopath AND an agent of confusion!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-85441363890516141282013-12-31T15:18:27.029-05:002013-12-31T15:18:27.029-05:00Physicist, I did not miss the point of analogy rat...Physicist, I did not miss the point of analogy rather, that it is not a good enough analogy. <br /><br />And no such thing as "alternative physics" because only one physics is not what the term is about. <br /><br />the physics you are used would have been called "alternative" in the days of the four elements and four humors and phlogiston.<br /><br />It means alternative to the present dominant theories, either more correct, or a new angle but not some separate thing. <br /><br />anon 2:35 do you mind? I've been having a conversation here. I also posted several valuable anti new age links more than anyone here the past few days.<br /><br />and I never called any one diarrhea sodden monkeys. you or someone repeatedly said I vomit and spew verbal diarrhea. I said you (who vomit venom) remind me of chimps throwing poop the shoe's on your foot.<br /><br />now I am done talking. please study the agenda 21 links, it is a very occultist, nazi, globalist type thing disguising itself as boring local politics.Christine Erikson (aka Justina)https://www.blogger.com/profile/11594093718714798117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-63046450451907486202013-12-31T14:35:49.810-05:002013-12-31T14:35:49.810-05:00Dear Constance
Christine Erikson has made six pos...Dear Constance<br /><br />Christine Erikson has made six posts here in the last 160 minutes. She has failed repeatedly to comply with your very reasonable request that she restrict herself to one post per 24 hours. She also calls people diarrhea-sodden monkeys and swine, which makes this blog toxic to those who wish to discuss New Age. Will you take action, please?<br /><br />Anon<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-2816814873278855752013-12-31T14:31:37.065-05:002013-12-31T14:31:37.065-05:00Christine @ 2.14pm, I@m sorry but your comments sh...Christine @ 2.14pm, I@m sorry but your comments show that you are out of your depth. The bladder explanation was an ANALOGY and it is accurate enough to make the point, although sadly not to you. There is no such thing as "alternative physics" because there is not alternative set of laws of physics - there is only one such set. If you want credibility on the subject, learn about them. NB Any emag field strong enough to significantly alter halflives of radioactive isotopes would destroy all life.<br /><br />Physicist<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-54628798757851942562013-12-31T14:26:04.946-05:002013-12-31T14:26:04.946-05:00Marko, on the surface that looks good. But the rea...Marko, on the surface that looks good. But the reason the coin flips is that someone is flipping it.<br /><br />that someone is the driver of the coin flip in itself.<br /><br />so what is the driver of the atom breakdown? dismissing it as built in nature doesn't help, since the issue is, why do not all break down at the same time? built in nature, to break down in for argument's sake 1 to 200 years. or more. <br /><br />That's quite a time frame. something else must be in play than just the thing's nature. Or, included in it, susceptibility to triggers we know nothing about.<br /><br />JUST THOUGHT OF THIS. The trigger might involve proximity to other elements especially radioactive ones. I don't mean chain fission but some kind of quantum signalling or something. <br /><br />That makes the whole thing more dicey.<br /><br />Meanwhile, you use two different radioactive elements to date something, they come back with radically different dates. something is wrong here.<br /><br />Leaning back in faith upon vastness of ages ("Darwin said it, I believe it, that's that") is based on less solid evidence than ruins and writings by eywitnesses however redacted they might be such as The Bible, which means when you say "The Bible says it, I believe it, that's that" you are on at least somewhat more solid ground than relying on Darwin & Co<br />because no one ever saw the processes they describe. Fossil record doesn't show real transition forms, just similar things and lots of animals are similar to each other now.<br /><br />Or are we going to argue that the monkfish is the ancestor to human monastics? The sea horse had descendants that went on land and became horses?Christine Erikson (aka Justina)https://www.blogger.com/profile/11594093718714798117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-75343920936680648462013-12-31T14:19:29.891-05:002013-12-31T14:19:29.891-05:00OMG Christine.
Christine listen very carefully:
Y...OMG Christine.<br /><br />Christine listen very carefully:<br />You have no credibility. None.<br />It's a hard thing to swallow for sure.<br /> For most people ( like me for instance ), who realize that fact about themselves, they initially have hurt feelings but eventually get over it and humble themselves, which is a good thing.<br />Not you.<br />You forge ahead completely oblivious without even a hiccup.<br />Unless you are a card carrying sociopath without<br />any sense of right or wrong, the only reasonable explanation for your comments is, as I've repeated before, that you are an agent of confusion. <br />It's called "jamming" and THAT is what you're up to.<br />It's intentional and it's systematic.paulnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-43500793864125783532013-12-31T14:17:44.080-05:002013-12-31T14:17:44.080-05:00Christine said:
"why do not all atoms of the...Christine said:<br /><br />"why do not all atoms of the same element decay at the same time?<br /><br />they don't and we don't know why."<br /><br />---<br /><br />Isn't it for the same reason (randomness) that a person who flips a coin 100 times doesn't always get the same number of heads and tails for each set of 100 flips? That is, for the first 100, I might get 45 heads, and 55 tails. The next 100 I might get 53 heads and 47 tails. If I do this repeatedly over a long period of time, the average number of heads vs. tails will approach 50-50. This is basic probability and statistics.<br /><br />If the coin flipping analogy is being incorrectly applied to radioactive decay (and obviously, radioactive decay has many more variables to take into account than coin-flipping, but the concept of randomness is what I'm getting at), then I guess I don't know enough about physics to say anything more. I will defer to Physicist who may be able to explain it better.<br /><br />Markonoreply@blogger.com