tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post2166121180856417580..comments2024-03-28T11:18:56.998-04:00Comments on My perspective -- What Constance thinks: NEW AGE REVOLUTION?Constance Cumbeyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07181096121385621574noreply@blogger.comBlogger50125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-32827841414605480202011-02-17T12:10:24.581-05:002011-02-17T12:10:24.581-05:00Dear NO LONGER CONFUSED,
I am so happy that I was...Dear NO LONGER CONFUSED,<br /><br />I am so happy that I was able to help you out.<br /><br />Blessings to you as well!<br /><br />SusannaSusannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-76347194118123020042011-02-16T21:44:51.444-05:002011-02-16T21:44:51.444-05:00An Afghanistani citizen is on trial in that countr...An Afghanistani citizen is on trial in that country for converting to Christianity. He faces execution if convicted. The World Evangelical Association has rightfully pointed out that this is an illegal trial and penalty as it is not allowed under the existing Afghanistan constitution. Now, we, the USA/NATO appear to be running Afghanistan, or at least those quarters where the Taliban is not in charge.<br /><br />WHERE IS THE USA ON THIS?????????!!!!!!!<br /><br />OMINOUS!<br /><br />http://tinyurl.com/4sxxvwp<br /><br />CONSTANCEConstance Cumbeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07181096121385621574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-23444536022424147902011-02-16T20:26:55.947-05:002011-02-16T20:26:55.947-05:00The Theosophists and the Sufis have always been ti...The Theosophists and the Sufis have always been tightly intertwined. Nieves Mathews spoke of her families' acquaintance with Krishnamurti (Theosophical candidate for "Maitreya" / "New World Christ" and heavy involvement in Sufism. Her middle name "Hayat" is a Sufi name given her by her parents. Nieves is, I believe, Javier Solana's mother whom he tried to hide because of her open professions of belief in Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh. At any rate, even given his current story that his mentor Salvador de Madariaga (also Rene Wadlow's mentor) was his "Great Uncle" for the genealogically dubious story that this was because their GRANDFATHERS WERE COUSINS, the Sufi link was part of the "bring on Maitreya" movement of the 1920s and appears to be again now.<br /><br />ConstanceConstance Cumbeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07181096121385621574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-45583850907016108162011-02-16T20:18:41.862-05:002011-02-16T20:18:41.862-05:00Riots now in Madison, Wisconsin that look so very ...Riots now in Madison, Wisconsin that look so very similar to events elsewhere. Question on CNN was "what happens when the money runs out" accompanied the footage. <br /><br />Tonight new breaking news that Israel is ready to act on two Iranian ships about to pass through the Suez Canal.<br /><br />http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/02/16/israel-warns-act-iranian-warships-passing-suez-canal/?intcmp=prn_baynote-js_Israel_Warns_It_Might_Act_on_Iranian_Warships_Passing_Through_Suez_Canal<br /><br />http://tinyurl.com/4z9apsq<br /><br />MUCH IS HAPPENING!<br /><br />ConstanceConstance Cumbeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07181096121385621574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-61194582130399438662011-02-16T19:35:36.998-05:002011-02-16T19:35:36.998-05:00Dear Susanna,
Thank-you so much for helping me ou...Dear Susanna,<br /><br />Thank-you so much for helping me out with this. What you have written makes sense. <br /><br />I really appreciate the time you have taken to help me. I am going to get a Douay-Rheims Bible!<br /><br />Blessings!<br /><br />No longer confusedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-5843864112454531952011-02-16T18:44:17.695-05:002011-02-16T18:44:17.695-05:00Has anyone taken not of the fact that all of these...Has anyone taken not of the fact that all of these countries except Saudi Arabia and Bahrain are part of the Barcelona Process???????<br /><br />YSAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-51652490682665584212011-02-16T16:41:43.418-05:002011-02-16T16:41:43.418-05:00P.S.
As you can see, here, it is the new Internat...P.S.<br /><br />As you can see, here, it is the new International Version which uses the term "morning star" and not "Lucifer." Nevertheless, they are synonymous terms.<br /><br />Moreover, if "Lucifer" is a reference to the devil BEFORE his fall, then there is really no problem with Christ referring to Himself as "the morning star," since the devil before his fall is described in Ezechiel 28:12 as "the seal of resemblance."Susannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-20702064255685242302011-02-16T16:06:34.926-05:002011-02-16T16:06:34.926-05:00cont...
The way I learned it, "Lucifer"...cont...<br /><br /><br />The way I learned it, "Lucifer" is <b>one</b> of the names that describes the devil before he fell ( another is "covering cherub" in Ezechiel Chapter 28 ) while "Satan," which means "adversary," describes the devil after he fell as do the terms "dragon," "accuser of the brethren," etc.<br /><br />Remember that Jesus described Peter as "Satan" ( Mark 8:33 ) when Peter appeared to be humanly unwilling to accept the fact that Christ's salvific mission involved Christ's having to die on the Cross. <br /> Like Satan in the desert, Peter was also trying to divert Jesus from the Cross, albeit without the malice.<br /><br />Douay-Rheims Bible<br /><br /><i>Who turning about and seeing his disciples, threatened Peter, saying: Go behind me, Satan, because thou savorest not the things that are of God, but that are of men.</i><br />________________________________<br /><br /> <br />New International Version (©1984)<br /><br /><i>But when Jesus turned and looked at his disciples, he rebuked Peter. "Get behind me, Satan!" he said. "You do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men."</i><br />________________________________<br /><br />Mark 8:33 (King James Version)<br /><br /> <i>33But when he had turned about and looked on his disciples, he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men.</i><br />_______________________________<br /><br />Here is the "covering cherub: passage from Ezechiel 28:12-17<br /><br /><i>"Thus says the Lord GOD, "You had the seal of perfection, Full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. 13 "You were in Eden, the garden of God; Every precious stone was your covering: The ruby, the topaz, and the diamond; The beryl, the onyx, and the jasper; The lapis lazuli, the turquoise, and the emerald; And the gold, the workmanship of your settings and sockets, Was in you. On the day that you were created They were prepared. 14 "You were the anointed cherub who covers, And I placed you there. You were on the holy mountain of God; You walked in the midst of the stones of fire. 15 "You were blameless in your ways From the day you were created, Until unrighteousness was found in you. 16 "By the abundance of your trade You were internally filled with violence, And you sinned; Therefore I have cast you as profane From the mountain of God. And I have destroyed you, O covering cherub, From the midst of the stones of fire. 17 "Your heart was lifted up because of your beauty; You corrupted your wisdom by reason of your splendor. I cast you to the ground; I put you before kings, That they may see you." (Ezekiel 28:12-17)</i><br />__________________________________<br /><br />When all is said and done, the devil - whether referred to as "Lucifer," "Satan," etc. refers to the chief of the fallen angels who led them in their revolt against God.<br /><br />The devil must have been very attractive and popular because he dragged one third of the angels with him in his fall.<br /><br />Certain heretical gnostic groups involved in the occult have claimed to know the "names" of angels. It would take another post to describe them. :-) <br /><br />The way I learned it, the Catholic Church doesn't formally recognize any names of angels or devils other than those found in the Bible.Susannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-3866468773234621312011-02-16T15:50:53.537-05:002011-02-16T15:50:53.537-05:00cont...
King James Version Isaias 4:12-20
The Fa...cont...<br /><br />King James Version Isaias 4:12-20<br /><br /><i>The Fall of Lucifer<br /><br /> 12 “ How you are fallen from heaven, <br /> O Lucifer,[b] son of the morning! <br /> How you are cut down to the ground, <br /> You who weakened the nations! <br /> 13 For you have said in your heart: <br /><br /> ‘ I will ascend into heaven, <br /> I will exalt my throne above the stars of God; <br /> I will also sit on the mount of the congregation <br /> On the farthest sides of the north; <br /> 14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds, <br /> I will be like the Most High.’ <br /> 15 Yet you shall be brought down to Sheol, <br /> To the lowest depths of the Pit. <br /> 16 “ Those who see you will gaze at you, <br /> And consider you, saying:<br /><br /> ‘ Is this the man who made the earth tremble, <br /> Who shook kingdoms, <br /> 17 Who made the world as a wilderness <br /> And destroyed its cities, <br /> Who did not open the house of his prisoners?’ <br /> 18 “ All the kings of the nations, <br /> All of them, sleep in glory, <br /> Everyone in his own house; <br /> 19 But you are cast out of your grave <br /> Like an abominable branch, <br /> Like the garment of those who are slain, <br /> Thrust through with a sword, <br /> Who go down to the stones of the pit, <br /> Like a corpse trodden underfoot. <br /> 20 You will not be joined with them in burial, <br /> Because you have destroyed your land <br /> And slain your people. <br /> The brood of evildoers shall never be named.</i><br /><br />http://www.biblegateway.com/<br />passage/?search=isaiah%2014:3-<br />14:20&version=NKJV<br />__________________________________<br /> <br />See Isaiah 4:12-20 New International Version<br /><br /><i> 12 How you have fallen from heaven, <b>morning star,</b> ( "Lucifer" ) son of the dawn! <br />You have been cast down to the earth, <br /> you who once laid low the nations! <br />13 You said in your heart, <br /> “I will ascend to the heavens; <br />I will raise my throne <br /> above the stars of God; <br />I will sit enthroned on the mount of assembly, <br /> on the utmost heights of Mount Zaphon.[b] <br />14 I will ascend above the tops of the clouds; <br /> I will make myself like the Most High.” <br />15 But you are brought down to the realm of the dead, <br /> to the depths of the pit. <br /><br /> 16 Those who see you stare at you, <br /> they ponder your fate: <br />“Is this the man who shook the earth <br /> and made kingdoms tremble, <br />17 the man who made the world a wilderness, <br /> who overthrew its cities <br /> and would not let his captives go home?” <br /><br /> 18 All the kings of the nations lie in state, <br /> each in his own tomb. <br />19 But you are cast out of your tomb <br /> like a rejected branch; <br />you are covered with the slain, <br /> with those pierced by the sword, <br /> those who descend to the stones of the pit. <br />Like a corpse trampled underfoot, <br /> 20 you will not join them in burial, <br />for you have destroyed your land <br /> and killed your people. <br /><br /> Let the offspring of the wicked <br /> never be mentioned again.</i><br /><br />http://www.biblegateway.com/<br />passage/?search=isaiah%2014:3-<br />14:20&version=NIV<br /><br />cont....Susannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-90335294456678479442011-02-16T15:49:35.784-05:002011-02-16T15:49:35.784-05:00Dear Confused,
I do not know which Bible you are ...Dear Confused,<br /><br />I do not know which Bible you are using, but before I begin this post, I just want to make it clear without getting into any disputes about which Bible is the real deal, that the Bible I use is the Douay-Rheims Bible which is based on the Latin Vulgate. But the relevant passages concerning the names "Lucifer" and "Satan" match up pretty well with the Protestant Bibles.<br /><br />That said, I will begin by pointing out that first of all, the Bible tells us that the <b>real</b> names of angels are "names" that we cannot even begin to comprehend. <br /><br />This is because they are probably something like the "white stone"/"white pebble" names such as the ones described in the Book of Revelation which will be given to each of us who are saved by God and will only be capable of of "being known" by God and the person who receives it......i.e. the <b>self</b> you call <b>your</b> self.....your unique "identity" as a <b>person</b> which no mere verbal name could ever adequately describe.<br /><br />Douay-Rheims Bible<br /><br /><i>And he answered him: Why askest thou my name, which is wonderful?</i> <br /><br />Judges 13:18<br />_______________________________<br /><br />Judges 13:18 (King James Version)<br /><br /> <i>18And the angel of the LORD said unto him, Why askest thou thus after my name, seeing it is secret?</i><br />_______________________________<br /><br />New Living Translation (©2007)<br /><br /><i>"Why do you ask my name?" the angel of the LORD replied. "It is too wonderful for you to understand."</i><br /><br />Judges 13:18<br />_______________________________<br /><br />When the devil is referred to as "Lucifer," the reference is to the devil <b>before</b> his fall in order to give one an understanding of the magnificence of the angelic holiness and beauty which he lost as a consequence of his malicious and disordered desire to "be as God."<br /><br />In the Scriptures, God graciously stoops to our intelligence and describes things in terms that we <b>can</b> understand. <br /><br />"Lucifer" was actually the name of a King of Babylon with whom the devil and his fall was compared in the Book of Isaias by way of analogy. This is why the devil has been traditionally referred to as "Lucifer." In Ezechiel 28, the devil is similarly compared with the King of Tyre, but Ezechiel doesn't name names.<br /><br />Douay - Rheims Bible Isaias 4:11-15<br /><br /><i>[11] Thy pride is brought down to hell, thy carcass is fallen down: under thee shall the moth be strewed, and worms shall be thy covering. [12] How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, who didst rise in the morning? how art thou fallen to the earth, that didst wound the nations? [13] And thou saidst in thy heart: I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God, I will sit in the mountain of the covenant, in the sides of the north. [14] I will ascend above the height of the clouds, I will be like the most High. [15] But yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, into the depth of the pit. <br /><br />[12] "O Lucifer"... O day star. All this, according to the letter, is spoken of the king of Babylon. It may also be applied, in a spiritual sense, to Lucifer the prince of devils, who was created a bright angel, but fell by pride and rebellion against God.</i><br /><br />http://www.drbo.org/chapter/27014.htm <br /><br />cont....Susannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-60714666768555753292011-02-16T15:06:56.503-05:002011-02-16T15:06:56.503-05:00Confused,
Try Isaiah 14:12, some later translati...Confused,<br /><br /> Try Isaiah 14:12, some later translations also have this as Day Star or Morningstar, but mine clearly says Lucifer and the context is clearly referring to Satan. Both my Strong's and Young's concordances both point to this passage of Isaiah, so it may be possible that as the translations of the Bible have written the name Lucifer out, so too have the concordances. <br /><br /> This is something some need to be careful of, just because it can't be readily found now, doesn't mean it was never there.JDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04920090468134075271noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-37929117390907435202011-02-16T14:39:45.124-05:002011-02-16T14:39:45.124-05:00"Chrislam, as the name suggests, is a growing..."Chrislam, as the name suggests, is a growing movement wherein some Christians are seeking to find common ground with Muslims. Indeed, it actually seeks to combine Christianity with Islam. It is a syncretistic movement that speaks about “spirituality without boundaries”. Whenever you hear that sort of talk, you should start heading for the hills."<br /><br />http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/february-13-2009/chrislam/2236/<br />Here's Chrislam in Nigeria<br /><br />There are many other websites dealing with Chrislam. The Messianic movement is targeting Muslims also, creating a blend of the two religions. <br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1TpXC73-DY&feature=related<br />Chrislam Montage<br /><br />Are you saying all of these writers are being tricked and there is no Chrislam?<br /><br />It is to the advantage of Islam to promote similarities to Christianity to make it more acceptable here in the US. It is to the advantage of one world religion promoters to show how religions can be blended.Dorothynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-51095883199778238052011-02-16T14:39:05.978-05:002011-02-16T14:39:05.978-05:00First of all you wrote Chislam, not Chrislam.
T...First of all you wrote Chislam, not Chrislam. <br /><br />Thehttp://www.onenewsnow.com/Church/Default.aspx?id=1286950<br />was Chrislam' in Protestant churches by Chad Groening <br /> <br />It linked to The Last Crusade website where you were right, they used a fake photo. But you are wrong about no other link in the article. There is a link to http://www.theird.org/ in the article. <br /><br />The article at the Last Crusade was titled QURAN IN THE PEWS JESUS IN THE QURAN By Paul L. Williams, Ph.D. It is a website with a history and a list of research topics. I guess they were tricked when searching for a picture for the article. <br /><br />Here's another article on Chrislam <br /><br />http://bigpeace.com/dladams/2011/02/08/chrislam-<br />core-values-without-a-core/<br />"In the same wishful thinking/ignorance mode of the “coexist” bumper sticker marketing program, “Chrislam” appears to be gaining traction in some Christian churches. This profoundly confused new Christian movement of appeasement/surrender to Islam, masquerading as “dialogue” and “bridge building,” should be the cause of great alarm. Bill Muehlenberg, a theologian, describes it succinctly:Dorothynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-27047560303877391292011-02-16T14:38:00.242-05:002011-02-16T14:38:00.242-05:00Third part
There are many other websites dealing ...Third part<br /><br />There are many other websites dealing with Chrislam. The Messianic movement is targeting Muslims also, creating a blend of the two religions. <br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1TpXC73-DY&feature=related<br />Chrislam Montage<br /><br />Are you saying all of these writers are being tricked and there is no Chrislam?<br /><br />It is to the advantage of Islam to promote similarities to Christianity to make it more acceptable here in the US. It is to the advantage of one world religion promoters to show how religions can be blended.Dorothynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-63345338540656157362011-02-16T14:37:18.540-05:002011-02-16T14:37:18.540-05:00Here's another article on Chrislam
http://bi...Here's another article on Chrislam <br /><br />http://bigpeace.com/dladams/2011/02/08/chrislam-<br />core-values-without-a-core/<br />"In the same wishful thinking/ignorance mode of the “coexist” bumper sticker marketing program, “Chrislam” appears to be gaining traction in some Christian churches. This profoundly confused new Christian movement of appeasement/surrender to Islam, masquerading as “dialogue” and “bridge building,” should be the cause of great alarm. Bill Muehlenberg, a theologian, describes it succinctly:<br /><br /> "Chrislam, as the name suggests, is a growing movement wherein some Christians are seeking to find common ground with Muslims. Indeed, it actually seeks to combine Christianity with Islam. It is a syncretistic movement that speaks about “spirituality without boundaries”. Whenever you hear that sort of talk, you should start heading for the hills."<br /><br />http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/february-13-2009/chrislam/2236/<br />Here's Chrislam in NigeriaDorothynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-73138509942738351392011-02-16T14:36:37.367-05:002011-02-16T14:36:37.367-05:0038 comments on the top page. 33 on the comments p...38 comments on the top page. 33 on the comments page. <br /><br />Broken down into 2 sections on the 7th try.<br /><br />First of all you wrote Chislam, not Chrislam. <br /><br />Thehttp://www.onenewsnow.com/Church/Default.aspx?id=1286950<br />was Chrislam' in Protestant churches by Chad Groening <br /> <br />It linked to The Last Crusade website where you were right, they used a fake photo. But you are wrong about no other link in the article. There is a link to http://www.theird.org/ in the article. <br /><br />The article at the Last Crusade was titled QURAN IN THE PEWS JESUS IN THE QURAN By Paul L. Williams, Ph.D. It is a website with a history and a list of research topics. I guess they were tricked when searching for a picture for the article.Dorothynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-56212846906784448672011-02-16T13:05:06.239-05:002011-02-16T13:05:06.239-05:00Top page says 37 comments. Are there five comments...Top page says 37 comments. Are there five comments hiding somewhere? LOL Comments page says 32 comments. Sixth time I posted it disappeared again. I think I'll post it in sections next time.Dorothynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-48261939225971626112011-02-16T12:56:34.560-05:002011-02-16T12:56:34.560-05:00Here's number 6
First of all you wrote Chislam...Here's number 6<br />First of all you wrote Chislam, not Chrislam. <br /><br />Thehttp://www.onenewsnow.com/Church/Default.aspx?id=1286950<br />was Chrislam' in Protestant churches by Chad Groening <br /> <br />It linked to The Last Crusade website where you were right, they used a fake photo. But you are wrong about no other link in the article. There is a link to http://www.theird.org/ in the article. <br /><br />The article at the Last Crusade was titled QURAN IN THE PEWS JESUS IN THE QURAN By Paul L. Williams, Ph.D. It is a website with a history and a list of research topics. I guess they were tricked when searching for a picture for the article. <br /><br />Here's another article on Chrislam <br /><br />http://bigpeace.com/dladams/2011/02/08/chrislam-<br />core-values-without-a-core/<br />"In the same wishful thinking/ignorance mode of the “coexist” bumper sticker marketing program, “Chrislam” appears to be gaining traction in some Christian churches. This profoundly confused new Christian movement of appeasement/surrender to Islam, masquerading as “dialogue” and “bridge building,” should be the cause of great alarm. Bill Muehlenberg, a theologian, describes it succinctly:<br /><br /> "Chrislam, as the name suggests, is a growing movement wherein some Christians are seeking to find common ground with Muslims. Indeed, it actually seeks to combine Christianity with Islam. It is a syncretistic movement that speaks about “spirituality without boundaries”. Whenever you hear that sort of talk, you should start heading for the hills."<br /><br />http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/february-13-2009/chrislam/2236/<br />Here's Chrislam in Nigeria<br /><br />There are many other websites dealing with Chrislam. The Messianic movement is targeting Muslims also, creating a blend of the two religions. <br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1TpXC73-DY&feature=related<br />Chrislam Montage<br /><br />Are you saying all of these writers are being tricked and there is no Chrislam?<br /><br />It is to the advantage of Islam to promote similarities to Christianity to make it more acceptable here in the US. It is to the advantage of one world religion promoters to show how religions can be blended.Dorothynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-19361972921928337132011-02-16T12:52:29.220-05:002011-02-16T12:52:29.220-05:00Interesting. Top page says 35 comments. Comments...Interesting. Top page says 35 comments. Comments page says 30 comments.Dorothynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-61480252747647229552011-02-16T12:48:32.345-05:002011-02-16T12:48:32.345-05:00Interesting, Susanna.
While we are wondering abou...Interesting, Susanna.<br /><br />While we are wondering about that, I came across another site, the new protestants, that has me scratching my head.<br /><br />They claim that Lucifer is not Satan, that that's a myth Christians came up with. In truth, I've wondered about that myself. The word Lucifer is not in my bible or in Strong's Concordance. It only appears in the King James as a translation from the Latin vulgate of the Hebrew term "Morning star" or "day star". This site claims the early church fathers came up with the word, and that Lucifer is unknown to the Jews.<br /><br />Even more confusing is the fact that Jesus refers to himself as the Morning Star in Revelations 22.<br /><br />So how are we to reconcile this?<br /><br />Since Constance is always discussing the New Age movement within the context of Luciferians like Alice Bailey and Madame Blavatsky, does Constance or anyone else know for a fact whether or not Lucifer really is Satan? Or must we rely on believing the early church father's identification of Lucifer as Satan, via Isaiah 12:14?<br /><br />http://newprotestants.com/LUCIFER.htm<br /><br />ConfusedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-43231786661180985802011-02-16T11:42:40.724-05:002011-02-16T11:42:40.724-05:00I just love to watch Hillary speak about the impor...I just love to watch Hillary speak about the importance of social networking, and how no government can shut it down to keep revolution and 'freedom of the people' from occuring...well, I hope she's going to be faced with her words when the 'Untied' States begin their quest for state's rights and it becomes a 'new revolution against government control and she and Homeland Security do the 'shut down' thing, here...keep her words printed in front of you..let's see how long this lasts here in this country. RaptorAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-29315350573367859982011-02-16T11:39:23.031-05:002011-02-16T11:39:23.031-05:00Hey guys....Here is one for the books.
It was p...Hey guys....Here is one for the books. <br /><br />It was posted at Breitbart's BIG PEACE site.<br /><br /><br /><b>Top Islamic Scholars Say Jews and Christians Know Islam Is True, Purposely Removed Muhammad from the Bible</b><br /><br />http://bigpeace.com/amutarjim<br />/2011/02/16/top-islamic-scholars<br />-say-jews-and-christians-know<br />-islam-is-true-purposely-removed<br />-muhammad-from-the-bible/#more-82276Susannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-31320419722007550812011-02-16T00:55:58.479-05:002011-02-16T00:55:58.479-05:00Should I try to post for a sixth time? Anonymous,...Should I try to post for a sixth time? Anonymous, I have an answer to your post. Something just won't let it stay up.Dorothynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-4684759419613280162011-02-15T22:53:48.397-05:002011-02-15T22:53:48.397-05:00Fifth time my post on Chrislam has disappeared aft...Fifth time my post on Chrislam has disappeared after appearing on the blog.Dorothynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-51177344456151311822011-02-15T22:51:52.808-05:002011-02-15T22:51:52.808-05:00Fifth time:
First of all you wrote Chislam, not C...Fifth time:<br /><br />First of all you wrote Chislam, not Chrislam. <br /><br />Thehttp://www.onenewsnow.com/Church/Default.aspx?id=1286950<br />was Chrislam' in Protestant churches by Chad Groening <br /> <br />It linked to The Last Crusade website where you were right, they used a fake photo. But you are wrong about no other link in the article. There is a link to http://www.theird.org/ in the article. <br /><br />The article at the Last Crusade was titled QURAN IN THE PEWS JESUS IN THE QURAN By Paul L. Williams, Ph.D. It is a website with a history and a list of research topics. I guess they were tricked when searching for a picture for the article. <br /><br />Here's another article on Chrislam <br /><br />http://bigpeace.com/dladams/2011/02/08/chrislam-<br />core-values-without-a-core/<br />"In the same wishful thinking/ignorance mode of the “coexist” bumper sticker marketing program, “Chrislam” appears to be gaining traction in some Christian churches. This profoundly confused new Christian movement of appeasement/surrender to Islam, masquerading as “dialogue” and “bridge building,” should be the cause of great alarm. Bill Muehlenberg, a theologian, describes it succinctly:<br /><br /> "Chrislam, as the name suggests, is a growing movement wherein some Christians are seeking to find common ground with Muslims. Indeed, it actually seeks to combine Christianity with Islam. It is a syncretistic movement that speaks about “spirituality without boundaries”. Whenever you hear that sort of talk, you should start heading for the hills."<br /><br />http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/february-13-2009/chrislam/2236/<br />Here's Chrislam in Nigeria<br /><br />There are many other websites dealing with Chrislam. The Messianic movement is targeting Muslims also, creating a blend of the two religions. <br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1TpXC73-DY&feature=related<br />Chrislam Montage<br /><br />Are you saying all of these writers are being tricked and there is no Chrislam?<br /><br />It is to the advantage of Islam to promote similarities to Christianity to make it more acceptable here in the US. It is to the advantage of one world religion promoters to show how religions can be blended.Dorothynoreply@blogger.com