tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post111621469998526553..comments2024-03-28T13:18:05.219-04:00Comments on My perspective -- What Constance thinks: Interesting forerunnersConstance Cumbeyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07181096121385621574noreply@blogger.comBlogger57125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-16102405594024932332008-12-16T04:19:00.000-05:002008-12-16T04:19:00.000-05:00Constance, I Love You. You may wish to check out t...Constance, I Love You. You may wish to check out the relationship between the 34 Banking Families and everything going wrong for all of us while it's all going just fine for the Bankers who finance both sides and make trillions from wars they instigated in the first place. Some Warriors are not fooled as they work from the 10th dimension and are directed by the highest in the heavens known to Man. God Bless You.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1123643220137134692005-08-09T23:07:00.000-04:002005-08-09T23:07:00.000-04:00Eric Jon Phelps is at it again as of August, 2005!...Eric Jon Phelps is at it again as of August, 2005! He has no shame!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116826042192436312005-05-23T01:27:00.000-04:002005-05-23T01:27:00.000-04:00Looks to me like either Crazy Eric Phelps has spro...Looks to me like either Crazy Eric Phelps has sprouted a couple new nom de plumes, or the strains of the Javier Watch have taken their toll on some of our faculties for discernment. In any event, I note that the Jesuits are once again on some of our minds. So I repeat the question that no one seems to have an answer for: What are the devoutly Christian regimes that have found it necessary to expel the Jesuits in the past 400 years? If the answer is, as I expect, "None", then when will this caterwalling end? <BR/><BR/>One of y'all was kind enough to point out that monotheism is the target of the New Age, and that monotheists ought not play into their hand, so to speak, with what amounts to intra-mural squabbling. Sound advice, to be sure. So, unless someone has a bona fide case to be made against the Society of Jesus, which should by all means be made, I suggest that, in deference to the many devout, holy men who serve and have served in that order (Ignatius Loyola, John Carroll, Malachi Martin, Avery Dulles, Juniperra Serra, etc.) many of whom have been martyred for the Faith, we cease the calumny, and soon!<BR/><BR/>I am NOT suggesting that there has never been a bad Jesuit, or one or more who has/have engaged in political intrigue. For an order to have existed for several hundred years, and included some of the finest minds of their age for all that time, it would be well nigh miraculous for NONE to have faltered. It is simply implausible for any reasonably cogent mind to feature the notion that the Society of Jesus has been in any meaningful way associated with the movement you all seem to loathe and fear, the New Age Movement. <BR/><BR/>Pax hominibus bonae voluntatis, y'all!<BR/><BR/>Connie, best of luck to you and Barry re: his surgery.<BR/><BR/>Truth, don't worry about offending me by mentioning the feminine nature of the Catholic Church. This is surely not a New Age theme. It relates to the Church as the Bride of Christ. There is Biblical basis for that metaphor, dating back as far as the Song of Songs. I rather doubt the Psalmist was a NEW AGER! So, no, you needn't worry yourself that the Catholic Church is really a New Age front organization. What you might want to give some thought to is why a few of our colleagues here seem so hell bent to paint it as such! (Remember folks, the "pax" is ONLY for those of "bonae voluntatis"!)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116729618623917022005-05-21T22:40:00.000-04:002005-05-21T22:40:00.000-04:00I read all your EJP stuff and agree although most ...I read all your EJP stuff and agree although most flakes have SOME truth mixed in. However, there are some other credible sounding sources about the Jesuits and their political influence in the last 400 years. One I will be reading shortly is the Brig Gen Thomas Harris book on the Lincoln assassination (cost me a fortune) ... anybody here read that one and "cross-examined" it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116689767384760712005-05-21T11:36:00.000-04:002005-05-21T11:36:00.000-04:00Constance, do an article on this and let us know i...Constance, do an article on this and let us know if there is a connection to the Theosophical Society in any of this. As a precursor to the hatred of monotheism by the Nazis, the information would be extremely important. I just put anti-clerical, Spain and 1936 into a search engine as was astounded at what I didn't know.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116687533567101812005-05-21T10:58:00.000-04:002005-05-21T10:58:00.000-04:00Comment to Dave:You might want to go to my archive...Comment to Dave:<BR/><BR/>You might want to go to my archives and read my various articles where Eric Jon Phelps is mentioned. Bluntly, he is a New Ager writing for New Agers (I base this on his shameless use of Theosophist Helena Petrovna Blavatsky combined with his telling hollow earth theories.) Also, I am reading up on the Inquisition and it appears that the Dominicans were far greater players than the Jesuits ever were -- and further the anticlerical persecutions,e.g. French Revolution of 1799, Mexico 1926-1935, Spain 1936-1939 may have well made the inquisition, bad as it was, look small-time.Constance Cumbeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07181096121385621574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116641981178099112005-05-20T22:19:00.000-04:002005-05-20T22:19:00.000-04:00terry . . . I see Contance sees you as a "high cal...terry . . . I see Contance sees you as a "high caliber" source. Am I correct in assuming your website is www.conspiracyarchive.com? I see this site has a 2 part article on the Jesuit Conspiracy. Maybe at least some of my Jesuit theories stated above hold water?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116640654837758312005-05-20T21:57:00.000-04:002005-05-20T21:57:00.000-04:00I feel humbled and honored to have Mr. Levanda vis...I feel humbled and honored to have Mr. Levanda visit this blogspot. I have had an incredibly busy week as a lawyer, limited my internet interaction, but I am honored to have people of the caliber of Levanda, Terry, and even "Booch" and SqueakBox joining in the conversations!<BR/><BR/>My husband is having heart operations next week, so I would appreciate the prayers of all!<BR/><BR/>Constance Cumbey<BR/>Friday, May 20, 2005Constance Cumbeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07181096121385621574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116607089186655382005-05-20T12:38:00.000-04:002005-05-20T12:38:00.000-04:00Peter Levenda - Unholy Alliances is an excellent b...Peter Levenda - Unholy Alliances is an excellent book, and I would recommend it to everyone. Efforts to surpress the information were made if I recall correctly, and you reported on that in your interviews. There appears to be two different titles for your new book, and the description for each is different on Amazon. Sinister Forces - A warm gun and Sinister Forces - the Nine. Two different publishing dates. Same publisher. <BR/><BR/>Whichever I get to read, I am looking forward to learning more.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116605095652902342005-05-20T12:04:00.000-04:002005-05-20T12:04:00.000-04:00I see that there are a number of references to Naz...I see that there are a number of references to Nazi occultism here, and the survival of some Nazi occult personalities/groups to the present day. I humbly offer my own published work on this topic -- Unholy Alliance: a history of Nazi involvement with the occult -- as further evidence. It's based on primary sources (such as the Captured German Records section of the National Archives, particularly the files related to the Ahnenerbe), and my own personal investigations and interviews in North and South America. I follow that up next month with Sinister Forces, which examines the role of the Paperclip scientists in some detail ... among other things.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116597963648024272005-05-20T10:06:00.000-04:002005-05-20T10:06:00.000-04:00Dave, the signing took place in Rome and not at th...Dave, the signing took place in Rome and not at the Vatican. You would have to find out why the first document was signed there. In addition, where have all the other documents been signed? <BR/><BR/>I think you are trying to play fill in the blanks with an idea you want to support rather than gathering your documentation before coming to a conclusion.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116582406024393592005-05-20T05:46:00.000-04:002005-05-20T05:46:00.000-04:00I'm sure you are right about Jobe Martin ... I was...I'm sure you are right about Jobe Martin ... I was working from fuzzy memory when I said late 70's.<BR/><BR/>Here's a link for you about the EU Constitution and the Treaty of Rome being signed in the same room in Rome. You'll probably nail me b/c I said "always" ... I'll revise that to "at least 2 foundational documents".<BR/><BR/>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3963701.stm<BR/><BR/>As for the Biblical image of the Harlot riding the Beast, there is quite strong support for this being a Revived Form of the old Roman Empire (the EU perhaps?) with some bloody, false religion (the New Age Movement? the Catholic Church with Jesuits pulling the strings? don't know) "riding" upon it.<BR/><BR/>Again I will say that Connie and Herb have done an excellent job documenting the "Beast" part of this vision. Now I would like to see some good research on the "Harlot" part as well. Anonymous, maybe you can provide me with some.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116558477959178492005-05-19T23:07:00.000-04:002005-05-19T23:07:00.000-04:00I'm anonymous because I think the information is m...I'm anonymous because I think the information is more important than the sender, and I know of the old communist technique of targeting the sender and avoiding the topic. By the way, after searching Google, it appears Dr. Jobe Martin wasn't spreading information about New Age in the late '70s. It appears that he talked about it in the mid '80s, several years after Constance broke it into the Christian community. That's not a problem. His area of research was creationism vs Darwinism, a very respectable area of the confrontation of ideas. I haven't looked at his material in this regard because I have other interests. <BR/><BR/>Could you document that EU documents are all signed in Rome? Now that would be interesting. <BR/><BR/>I have no problem with people speaking of Bible prophecy. It's just that I've seen so many references to different speakers who draw an audience based on their speculations alone. Is it that hard to relate prophecy to the real world? Herb and Constance document their speculations and do not just jump in with ideas off the wall. I know I learn what is going on in the world from them without having to hang on prophecy speculation. Their material has a logical consistency.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116556025211563462005-05-19T22:27:00.000-04:002005-05-19T22:27:00.000-04:00If you want convoluted, go to vaticanassassins.org...If you want convoluted, go to vaticanassassins.org and read about Fire and Ice as was pointed out a short time ago here. But there is nothing convoluted about Jesuits and political subversion. Why do we think it has stopped just because its been a while since they were thrown out of a country? Does it not even smell a little bit fishy to anyone that EU documents are always signed in Rome? (Vatican and Jesuit HQ) Does not the history of the 20th century speak of some intrigue and things not being as they seem? There is strong evidence for a conspiracy and I don't think the New Age Movement is the whole story. As for Bible Prophecy being convoluted if that's what you mean, I think you may be on the wrong site to find people who agree with that view. It appears that Constance and Herb Peters are in agreement in large part about that topic. I am not planning on "proving" any theories on this site -- it's not my site. I simply have an interest in finding out if any readers here have any good factual material on Jesuits which may be related to Constance's topics of interest. If you don't that's fine, but you don't help your image by hurling rotten eggs -- maybe that's why you are "anonymous".<BR/><BR/>Cheers!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116537852824504882005-05-19T17:24:00.000-04:002005-05-19T17:24:00.000-04:00Dave, its your thesis. You have to prove it to th...Dave, its your thesis. You have to prove it to the satisfaction of others, not just me. I have not seen anything so convoluted elsewhere.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116537317504058202005-05-19T17:15:00.000-04:002005-05-19T17:15:00.000-04:00I'll take a look at your historical document-maybe...I'll take a look at your historical document-maybe it will be of value. Do you have anything else factual which disproves my "Jesuit/EU/Solana=Woman on Beast" hypothesis?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116535463581981782005-05-19T16:44:00.000-04:002005-05-19T16:44:00.000-04:00Do you have a problem with someone calling your at...Do you have a problem with someone calling your attention to a historical document? I'm such a meanie pointing out something you would rather others didn't note.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116534971001630012005-05-19T16:36:00.000-04:002005-05-19T16:36:00.000-04:00No, I didn't miss your Blavatsky comment. I just ...No, I didn't miss your Blavatsky comment. I just chose to ignore it because you seem quite opinionated and appear to attack people you disagree with.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116533636575377552005-05-19T16:13:00.000-04:002005-05-19T16:13:00.000-04:00Dave, silly comment. If "lousy company" was the b...Dave, silly comment. If "lousy company" was the better standard, then you would be better off in prison than in church. Clever doesn't cut it. <BR/><BR/>Did you somehow miss my quote showing how your thinking about the Jesuits parallels that of Blavatsky's views? <BR/><BR/>Jesus went among the people and one of the reasons he was crucified was that he posed a threat to the the government of the time. He wouldn't have been considered a threat if he just sat on his hands and thought about heaven.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116530417706119712005-05-19T15:20:00.000-04:002005-05-19T15:20:00.000-04:00Thanks for the info "truth". That's funny that so...Thanks for the info "truth". That's funny that someone suspects me of being you! My post about Jesuits was a serious one. I really wish there was some really solid research out there such as Constance is well known for that might tie this together. BTW "anonymous"- Jesus Christ kept some pretty lousy company from the world's perspective, but look how famous he is now! You hang around "Bible crazies" like me and "truth" and who knows where you may wind up. My choice for you would be Heaven, which will last a lot longer than any earthly government. Have a great day!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116529384139491052005-05-19T15:03:00.000-04:002005-05-19T15:03:00.000-04:00Well, then from now on I'll provide sources from n...Well, then from now on I'll provide sources from now on.<BR/><BR/>As for my blog comments, I have them on, but my blog is screwed up for some reason. I've been trying to figure it out, but I see I might have to get help from elsewhere.<BR/><BR/>Also, I never said that I did not like challenges to my point of view, what I did say is your approach was not appreciated.<BR/><BR/>Gotta go to work can't talk anymore.David Moorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11018252853331869727noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116528675169867982005-05-19T14:51:00.000-04:002005-05-19T14:51:00.000-04:00"truth" you can believe whatever you want to belie..."truth" you can believe whatever you want to believe. Here's a comparison. <BR/>If I stood on a platform and said "I believe the moon is made of green cheese and I think "truth" is the most intelligent person in the world," then when others looked at what you wrote they would remember that a person who thinks the moon is made of green cheese also thinks you are brilliant. A person is known by the company they keep it's said. I am exaggerating of course to make a point clear. If 200 people believe your speculations, it does not make them fact. <BR/><BR/>As your home has not been presented as evidence and you present no evidence for your speculation, it would be foolish to assume you have any evidence to present in an intellectual discussion. Are we to naively be charitable and to accept whatever anyone says in good faith? <BR/><BR/>Now you just may have valid research to support your speculations. Nothing is stopping you from bringing it forward here. You have a nice blog at http://www.blessedhopewatch.blogspot.com/<BR/>Not everyone who reads the comments may know that. I do notice you do not allow comments there. If you do not like challenges to your point of view, tough.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116528062349303862005-05-19T14:41:00.000-04:002005-05-19T14:41:00.000-04:00I have a feeling that Pre-tribbers aren't liked by...I have a feeling that Pre-tribbers aren't liked by some people that post on Constance's blog.<BR/><BR/>As I already implied, it's pre-tribbers that are in the closet. Marginalizing pre-tribbers can't be right at all.David Moorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11018252853331869727noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116524425384215002005-05-19T13:40:00.000-04:002005-05-19T13:40:00.000-04:00Well anonymous, unless you live in my house and kn...Well anonymous, unless you live in my house and know where I get my information from. I don't understand how you would come to the conclusion that my information is supported or unsupported without stating some corrections. I'm assuming that you may have better knowledge than I on this and that's fine--if that is the case, why not give some corrections to guide me and others along. Your whole response basically implied, "If what you have to say, be it opinion or speculation, don't bring it in here." Quite frankly, that's a real turn off and if I were not a believer in Christ and I witnessed this ordeal, I would be turned off by you. I will grant you I should not have stated that my speculations were the truth. I should have qualified that in some way. I honestly did not mean it that way. I acknowledge that there is a possibility that my sources are not credible, but otherwise your accusation is extremely beyond your possible knowledge--unless, like I said, you live in my house and show up at my work place.<BR/><BR/>Also, I just stated my opinion about the EU. For the record, I didn't seek to attack Constance at all. It's just my point of view--a view might I add that is the product of seeing through the lense of the Pre-Tribulational rapture. I can state my beliefs and I don't apprecite your attack. I appreciate what you said, and I will take it to heart to make sure that I research more deeply if need be, but don't attack me. You don't know who I am, and I don't know who you are--as such I wouldn't go out against like that by name. In a medium such as this, it is so easy to be misunderstood. <BR/><BR/>Also, I don't know who "dave" is. This statement that you made, "Since David is the name used by "the truth", any chance David talking to Dave is David talking to himself?" I don't find to be Christ-like. Instegating strife, even if there is disagreement, is not the way. There was another way you could have approached me.<BR/><BR/>Lastly, I was not seeking to make Constance's work look "flakey". If you believe that my beliefs are flakey, then simply say it. Don't beat around the bush.<BR/><BR/> If you chop off somebody's nose, what's the point in offering flowers. Instead, I simply state my point of view, and if a person doesn't like it or disagrees then talk to me in a convincing and civil way about the opposing view. Accusations with no support is just a clanging cymbal.<BR/><BR/>So, anonymous, I'm sorry if you disagree with me, but for now this is the conclusion that I have come to. And inspite of your displeasing approach to confront me, as a believer in Christ, I will double check my sources and research. Thank you for that wisdom.<BR/><BR/>I will take back my statement that what I said was the truth, but rather state that this is my opinion and mere speculation. My sincerest apology to those who might have been mislead. I wrote that last sentence in my haste to leave my home.<BR/><BR/>Always trying to be in Christ's love,<BR/><BR/>truth<BR/><BR/>Maranatha!<BR/><BR/>P.S. Herb said something a time ago that really rang true to me, but not the way he meant it. He basically said that people who don't hold to the belief int he Pre-Tribulational rapture end up becoming closeted for it. On the contrary, I think I could say the same thing. Now, if my nutty belief in such a thing is too flakey for some people and I am not welcome, then be forthcoming about it. I wouldn't ostracize people with an opposing point of view and seek to get others on my side.David Moorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11018252853331869727noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1116514066276658742005-05-19T10:47:00.000-04:002005-05-19T10:47:00.000-04:00Since David is the name used by "the truth", any c...Since David is the name used by "the truth", any chance David talking to Dave is David talking to himself?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com