tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post1954245856680862858..comments2024-03-19T05:57:17.370-04:00Comments on My perspective -- What Constance thinks: MADARIAGA FOUNDATION: "BRETTON WOODS NEEDS A 3G PLUSConstance Cumbeyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07181096121385621574noreply@blogger.comBlogger195125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-2516508056904581092010-10-16T10:43:33.146-04:002010-10-16T10:43:33.146-04:00Mariel,
Actually use of Yashuha has nothing to do ...Mariel,<br />Actually use of Yashuha has nothing to do with Judiazing as Yashuha is not the real name. The Jewish name is Yeshua, I really have no real Idea where the bastardized Yashuha comes from, but it is not by any stretch the name of Jesus.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-17053390321490345682010-10-15T14:48:35.184-04:002010-10-15T14:48:35.184-04:002) To Anon at 5:20 PM Continued here:
Again yo...2) To Anon at 5:20 PM Continued here:<br /><br /> Again you pack your response with irrelevancy to the question at hand. Firstly, You infer the word 'mass' where I speak of circulation based upon your irrelevant premise of the notion that few people could read [despite you not providing percentages of such for the period in question of how many people, in Israel and Greece for example, could read, and how many dedicated scribes there were etc, even if you did, which you haven't, such information would be irrelevant, given the information I have provided for my points at hand.) Whether this is the case or no, IT IS IRRELEVANT to the question at hand, which favours my points due to the academic resources at hand. <br /><br /> Secondly, I note that the academic evidence points to the 27 books of the New Testament being in free circulation by 70 to 100 AD, facilitated by the codex form which in turn became the format overwhelmingly accepted by Christians for production and distribution of copies of the 27 books of the New Testament.<br /><br /> Your point, I repeat, over how many people were able to read is a red herring and you know it! The point is, I repeat again, that scholars agree, as the overwhelming evidence impels them to, that the inclusion of the 27 books into the New Testament canon and the distribution of all 27 books, was agreed long before the Roman 'Catholic' Institution ever existed, itself being established by Constantine!<br /><br />Provide worthy academic evidence to refute my claims of the 27 books being recogised, copied and diseminated well before Constantine, his Council of Nicea, and establishment of Roman 'Catholicism'. You've provided no sources so far. Keep it relevant.<br /><br />Face it, you don't like to face facts, and you have nothing substantial, despite your red-herrings, irrelevancies, strawmen, and diversions, and cannot back up anything you purport, relevant to my points, with which to refute my argument!<br /><br /> Educate yourself, and stop waffling, keep things relevant! You have done nothing but further highlight your ignorance of both academic method, the historic period we are concerned with, and my validated points at hand!<br /><br />I can no longer humor you. It is pointless to try to educate you, for you are obviously unwilling to be educated or to provide any educated points outside speculation!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-67359128454167436672010-10-15T14:47:19.238-04:002010-10-15T14:47:19.238-04:00P.S., Anon at 5:20, regards your irrelevancies. Yo...P.S., Anon at 5:20, regards your irrelevancies. You obviously have no concept of the history of oracy and literacy. If you did, you would not put up such strawmen. In cultures, relevant to the period and region to which my points pertain. Those who did not take up aprenticehips to learn to read and write and effectively be trained as scribes, and for the general populace who were neither rich nor offered the position to train as a scribe, were nonetheless in the habit of learning by memory, word for word, those things pertaining to Holy Scripture, which were relayed to them; a feat unimaginable by the vast majority of people in today's modern society in the West. Their memories were so habituated to storing such information repeated to them over and again, that the prospect of 'Chinese whispers', was negligable if not non-existent.<br /><br />Notwithstanding my response above to your irrelevant and naive comments relating to literacy and the propensity to disseminate, the facts remain that evidentially the 27 books of the Holy Scripture were agreed upon as uniquely Holy Scripture regarding the New Testament and were freely disseminated in codex format long before Constantine and RCism. Those who read, did, and narrated to others who in turn committed the passages to memory in their entirety!<br /><br />The Council of Nicea, presided over by Constantine just BEFORE the establishment of anything resembling or being the Roman 'Catholic' 'Church', dealt with Arianism and affirmed, because of doubts being sown by promoters of Arianism, the Divinity of Jesus Christ [already recognised by those of the Church that had not succumbed to anything pertaining to Arianism]. <br /><br /> The Council of Nicea was not where the 27 books of the New Testament were first recognised as uniquely being that pertaining to inspired Scripture, which happened in the 1st Century organically and similtaneous to the period immediate to the completion of all that is contained within those blessed 27 books, the 27 books copied being disseminated from the word go! [70 -100 A.D.!] <br /><br /> I have nothing more to add, as you are obviously deaf and blind to the truth!<br /><br /><br />SEEING AS MY POST KEEPS DISAPPEARING, AND IS NOW JUMBLED LET IT BE SEEN IN ORDER! IF IT JUMBLES AGAIN, PLEASE FOLLOW THE NUMBERING!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-91512548262394335502010-10-15T14:46:48.733-04:002010-10-15T14:46:48.733-04:002) To Anon at 5:20 PM Continued here:
Again yo...2) To Anon at 5:20 PM Continued here:<br /><br /> Again you pack your response with irrelevancy to the question at hand. Firstly, You infer the word 'mass' where I speak of circulation based upon your irrelevant premise of the notion that few people could read [despite you not providing percentages of such for the period in question of how many people, in Israel and Greece for example, could read, and how many dedicated scribes there were etc, even if you did, which you haven't, such information would be irrelevant, given the information I have provided for my points at hand.) Whether this is the case or no, IT IS IRRELEVANT to the question at hand, which favours my points due to the academic resources at hand. <br /><br /> Secondly, I note that the academic evidence points to the 27 books of the New Testament being in free circulation by 70 to 100 AD, facilitated by the codex form which in turn became the format overwhelmingly accepted by Christians for production and distribution of copies of the 27 books of the New Testament.<br /><br /> Your point, I repeat, over how many people were able to read is a red herring and you know it! The point is, I repeat again, that scholars agree, as the overwhelming evidence impels them to, that the inclusion of the 27 books into the New Testament canon and the distribution of all 27 books, was agreed long before the Roman 'Catholic' Institution ever existed, itself being established by Constantine!<br /><br />Provide worthy academic evidence to refute my claims of the 27 books being recogised, copied and diseminated well before Constantine, his Council of Nicea, and establishment of Roman 'Catholicism'. You've provided no sources so far. Keep it relevant.<br /><br />Face it, you don't like to face facts, and you have nothing substantial, despite your red-herrings, irrelevancies, strawmen, and diversions, and cannot back up anything you purport, relevant to my points, with which to refute my argument!<br /><br /> Educate yourself, and stop waffling, keep things relevant! You have done nothing but further highlight your ignorance of both academic method, the historic period we are concerned with, and my validated points at hand!<br /><br />I can no longer humor you. It is pointless to try to educate you, for you are obviously unwilling to be educated or to provide any educated points outside speculation!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-84600256563000050102010-10-15T14:46:24.225-04:002010-10-15T14:46:24.225-04:00Having my posts removed from the page after this o...Having my posts removed from the page after this one, yet pertaining to infromation on this page and the later page [THAT PAGE IS ARC & WARREN TOPIC] I will post them in succession here. They refer to 5:20 PM of the later page, who'd earlier made posts on this page! <br /><br />1) Anon at 5:20 pm,<br /><br /> do you deny that Christians used the codex form before the 3rd Century, i.e. 200 AD? The point in question is was the Holy Bible, especially the 27 books of the New Testament already agreed apon and in circulation well before the invention of the Roman Catholic Church & therefore well before the Council of Nicea, the answer is yes to both of these points. <br /><br />Secondly, the Roman Catholic Church deliberately kept the Latin Vulgate [ A poor & corrupt translation from the original Greek MANUSCRIPTS], allowed only the Roman Church heirarchy to read & interpret it, forbidding the laypersons to do so, even if they were extremely dynamic in reading texts, and murdered people such as Tyndale for translating the Bible, even the Corrupt Vulgate, let alone the Greek, into the vernacular. So Rome inhibited and demoted the disemination of the Holy Bible, & it did not originate the disemination of the 27 NT books! <br /><br />[In fact, at the Council of Trent, Rome decided to include the Apocryphal books as part of Divinely Inspired Holy Scripture, which were important historical books, granted, but were NEVER PART of the True Canon of God's inspired Holy Scripture! It is a red herring for Rome to pretend it doesn't view the Apocrypha as part of God's Inspired Holy Scripture just because it terms the books of the Apocrypha as deutrocanonical, it does and to its great error!<br /><br /> (NO mention of any part of the Aprocryphal books is found in the New Testament, unlike the references in the New Testament pertaining to every one of the 39 books of the Old Testament)<br /><br /> How many people could read versus how many couldn't during the 1st, 2nd, & 3rd Centuries is irrelevant to the point of whether the contents of the 27 books had been agreed upon as Divinely given Holy Scripture, and whether the entirety, whether or not bound in one item, were in circulation well before Roman catholicism even existed. The answer to both questions being a resounding yes!<br /><br />Continued belowAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-75697670439911157672010-10-13T10:58:43.815-04:002010-10-13T10:58:43.815-04:00Where I've written acedemic in last post, it s...Where I've written acedemic in last post, it should read academic, as in academy or academia... still,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-28809980474390822152010-10-13T10:25:33.185-04:002010-10-13T10:25:33.185-04:00Anonymous, "you wrote at 3:50 To "a form...Anonymous, "you wrote at 3:50 To "a former catholic"<br />You really believe that the bible was bound and in full circulation in 100 AD? The printing press wasn't even invented until the 1500s. How were the books chosen? I am sure there were thousands of writings (papyrus, scrolls, etc.). Use your intelligence, I know it's in there!"<br /><br />Your own words expose your ignorance. The Holy Bible, and the means to effectively create copies [have you heard of scribes?], and distribute it easily were in place, according to acedemics, by the early Christians, long before Constantine and his creation of the Mother of Harlots, RCism ever existed!<br />3:50 PM<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />"Certain historians of Greek Civilization have claimed that papyrus books - that is, rolls - must have existed in Greece from the Homeric period (8 to 9 Centuries B.C.) with leather rolls going back to an even earlier time. However, the earliest surviving rolls of papyrus date from only the 4th Century B.C... <br /><br />The very word biblion [i.e., book], comes from the material byblos (papyrus)The famous Dead Sea scrolls are, of course, in roll form, but the more recently discovered Nag Hammadi Gnostic Gospels [we're interested here in indicating an example pertaining to era, not in promoting the false gospels of the Gnostics] are in codex [books in leaf form & bound, as we identify books as being today].<br /><br /> It was in Rome that the wax tablet books [that is, Rome before Constantine, and we know that Rome occupied Palestine & Greece during the time of Our Lord's first comming, and during the period immediately following the Resurrection] were replaced by parchment leaves, or membranae, referred to in Martial. There were several virtues to this new type of codex. First, a text written in codex could be easily cited, a convenience QUICKLY realized by CHRISTIAN AUTHORS & SCRIBES [Well before RCism & the Council of Nicea!], who perhaps took over the codex form under the influence of Roman lawyers [i.e., well before RCism even existed]: EASE OF REFERENCE [because rolls are long and cumbersome] WAS IMPORTANT TO both legal & PATRISTIC SCHOLARSHIP. Second, the codex could receive writing on both sides of the leaf. Third, it was compact and could therefore store much longer texts. Fourth, it was more easily storable...<br /><br /> The codex form of the book was taken up VERY QUICKLY by CHRISTIANS, and soon only pagan works [excepting legal documents] were written in roll form. Perhaps it was the advantage of having an ENTIRE BIBLE, or at least a testament or commentary [27 NT books of which could still be easily stored, (along with OT books)],in one volume [i.e., text gathered into item as we currently understand the word volume, as opposed to its eytomological volume as the word is latin for roll(from evolvere =to roll)]; or perhaps it was the sheer "difference" from the pagan form [excepting pagan Rome's legal documentation] that attracted the CHRISTIANS. What ever the reasons, BY the THIRD CENTURY [200 A.D. onwards, about 120 years before Constantine] the roll was in decline, as was pagan literature itself... <br /><br />All the above cited from, 'Textual Scholarship, An Introduction', by D.C. Greetham, Pub. by, Garland Publishing Inc., New York & London, 1994. ISBN: 0-8153-1791-3<br /><br /> So, early Christians very quickly adopted the codex form & well before 200 A.D., as by the 3rd Century [200A.D. onwards] the roll format was already in decline. It is therefore entirely feasable and highly probable that Christians had begun using the codex format by 100 A.D., if not before! And, if there were some still using rolls, so be it, but they still would've had the bible written down, though the acedemic explanation is, to repeat, that they were aready using codex, writing in the lingua franca of the Middle East & nearby countires, i.e., Greek not Latin!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1297808543720499052010-10-12T22:40:12.193-04:002010-10-12T22:40:12.193-04:00Peacebringer, I already said that I am not a follo...Peacebringer, I already said that I am not a follower of the doctrines of Joseph Herrin. I just found his listing of those throughout history who did not believe Hell was eternal was surprising. And probably accurate, because he is a conscientious writer, even though I disagree with some basics of his thoughts.<br /><br />And the person who suggested that I should look within and see WHICH Spirit was inspiring me, remember that Jesus said that people would claim that His inspiration was of the Devil. It may be hard in Satan's world to know which is prompting one, Satan or Jesus. But that is our FAITH, that we are following Jesus in spite of the subterfuges of Satan. If we call on the name of Jesus, we will receive guidance, even if it takes a while sometimes.<br /><br />And I agree, Peacebringer, that using the name Yashua for Jesus is not always a good idea. Too much Judaizing? <br /><br />Gosh so hard to be a Christian, so many rules to follow. <br /><br />Follow the MAIN one, to love God with all your heart and to love others as yourself. And don't hate yourself and negate the latter. We have been taught to hate our selves.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-68310693809262046862010-10-12T16:15:35.123-04:002010-10-12T16:15:35.123-04:00To Anon at 3:50 PM,
Where did Former Catholic wr...To Anon at 3:50 PM, <br /><br />Where did Former Catholic write it was through the printing press? Research! Do you think that Christians in the latter of the 1st & 2nd Centuries really did not have the full 27 books of the New Testament in circulation?<br /><br />Stop denying history, I would suggest you use your intelligence but you are obviously deluded with a seared conscience to boot!<br /><br />P.S., which part of the following passages from the 10 Commandments do you not understand?<br /><br />Thou shalt have no other gods before me. <br /><br /> Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. <br /><br />Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; <br /><br /> And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-75673096232356199872010-10-12T15:59:18.876-04:002010-10-12T15:59:18.876-04:00I have said it before, the Tierra/Terra is cap and...<i>I have said it before, the Tierra/Terra is cap and trade on steroids and amphetamines. In other words, it is the perfect vehicle for the globalists.</i><br /><br />Absolutely, as this will make the transfer of wealth that much easier.Craignoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-56308689976163857902010-10-12T15:30:51.342-04:002010-10-12T15:30:51.342-04:00Susanna,
Spot on reporting as always! It has bee...Susanna,<br /><br /> Spot on reporting as always! It has been my contention that the traditional idea of a basket currency will be shot down over fears that a small handful of currencies are just too unstable to support the worlds economy. The rising debt crisis may seal the deal on this one.<br /><br /> Instead something with intrinsic value outside of paper money may be sought. Something that the value of can be controlled more easily than wavering markets or a nations debt management policies. Carbon answers all of these calls as well as accomplishing the "green goals".<br /><br /> I have said it before, the Tierra/Terra is cap and trade on steroids and amphetamines. In other words, it is the perfect vehicle for the globalists. I am still not sure if the change to this direction will be all at once, but am absolutely certain that such is a desired end result.JDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04920090468134075271noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-90043928569082408372010-10-12T15:30:02.611-04:002010-10-12T15:30:02.611-04:00The last paragraph of the following article is ins...The last paragraph of the following article is instructive.<br /><br /><b>THE U.S. CHINA CURRENCY DISPUTE</b><br /><br />......<i>The US-China currency dispute is a symptom of the non-system of international monetary relations. Fighting the cause of the dispute rather than dealing with the symptom is the way forward. If the Obama Administration were to apply its New Philosophy to the international monetary system and start considering its transformation by basing it on a carbon-based monetary standard, the dispute would be resolved and the world would become a very different place. The Institute’s Tierra Land of 2025 scenario spells out this new world together with the social processes that make this Great Monetary Transition possible. It proposes that nations pass a UN General Assembly resolution to establish the UN Commission of Experts on Monetary Transformation and Low Carbon, Climate-resilient Development that submit its Monetary Plan of Climate Action via the UN FCCC to the Rio 2012 Earth Summit where monetary global governance would become part of its global economic and environmental governance. In preparation of that Commission the IIMT has started to organize international professional working groups that are doing the research, education and action needed to have the world transition from the non-system in international monetary relations to a carbon-based international monetary system which being glue (Eichengreen 2008) would bind together and transform the global financial, economic and commercial systems</i>....read entire article...<br /><br />http://www.timun.net/blog/post.php?i=98<br />______________________________<br /><br />IMHO, globally embracing the Terra (a.k.a. Tierra) based on the carbon standard could very well open the door wider to one world governemnt. <br /><br />It is basically a currency based on hot air!!!<br /><br />Wouldn't Al Gore and Maurice Strong (from his hidey hole in China) be thrilled!<br /><br />Sounds like another species of socialism to me with a little "green" religion thrown in to make it look respectable.<br /><br />Anyone ever heard of "inverted totalitarianism?"<br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/<br />Inverted_totalitarianism<br />_________________________<br /><br />Same circus - different clowns.Susannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-25579124776595069262010-10-12T15:06:51.081-04:002010-10-12T15:06:51.081-04:00The raison D'etre of the Bretton Woods Confere...The raison D'etre of the Bretton Woods Conferences was to make decisions on global currency systems. <br /><br />While reading the following articles, we might want to recall the information on the new default currency being proposed called the "Terra" which is based on the carbon standard instead of the gold standard.<br /><br /><b>TERRA (Currency)</b><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra<br />_(currency)<br />____________________________<br /><br />It seems to me that this begs the question concerning the issue of whether or not a "Bretton Woods III" might be convened with a view to changing the global default currency - at least in part - to the Terra.<br /><br /><b>NEW CURRENCY DEAL: ALTERNATIVES TO THE DOLLAR</b><br />April 1, 2010<br /><br />http://knowledge.wpcarey.asu.edu/<br />article.cfm?articleid=1876<br /><br /><br /><b>CHINA STAKES CLAIM TO SOUTH TEXAS OIL, GAS</b><br /><br />By Monica Hatcher - Houston Chronicle Web Posted: 10/12/2010 12:48 AM CDT<br /><br />HOUSTON — <b>State-owned</b> Chinese energy giant CNOOC is buying a multibillion-dollar stake in 600,000 acres of South Texas oil and gas fields, potentially testing the political waters for further expansion into U.S. energy reserves. <br />With the announcement Monday that it would pay up to $2.2 billion for a one-third stake in Chesapeake Energy assets, CNOOC lays claim to a share of properties that eventually could produce up to half a million barrels a day of oil equivalent.<br /><br />It also might pick up some American know-how about tapping the hard-to-get deposits trapped in dense shale rock formations, analysts said.<br /><br />As part of the deal, the largest purchase of an interest in U.S. energy assets by a Chinese company, CNOOC has agreed to pay about $1.1 billion for a chunk of Chesapeake’s assets in the Eagle Ford, a broad oil and gas formation that runs largely from southwest of San Antonio to the Mexican border.<br /><br />CNOOC also will provide up to $1.1 billion more to cover drilling costs.<br /><br /><b>The deal represents China’s second try at making a big move into the U.S. oil and gas market, following a failed bid five years ago to buy California-based Unocal Corp.</b>....read more....<br /><br />http://www.mysanantonio.com/<br />business/local/China_stakes_claim_<br />to_S_Texas_oil_gas_104753969.html<br />____________________________<br /><br />What might this have to do with Javier Solana? <br /><br />Let us not forget that he and his new best friend Strobe Talbott at the Brookings Institute recently attended a meeting at Yalta. Interestingly, it has been reported that the Russians would like the new default global currency to be the Ruble.<br /><br /><b>Ruble Eurobond to Cut Yield as Kremlin Seeks Currency Clout: Russia Credit</b><br />Sept. 13, 2010<br /><br />http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010<br />-09-12/ruble-eurobond-to-cut-yield<br />-as-kremlin-seeks-currency-clout<br />-russia-credit.html<br /><br /><br />Hmmmmmmm!Susannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-50429583170874567122010-10-12T14:45:32.800-04:002010-10-12T14:45:32.800-04:00EVEN HE ( GOERGE SOROS ) CAN'T SAME THEM!
Oct...EVEN HE ( GOERGE SOROS ) CAN'T SAME THEM!<br /><br />October 11, 2010, 8:38 am <br /><b>Soros: I Can’t Stop a Republican ‘Avalanche’</b><br />By SEWELL CHAN<br /><br /><i>George Soros, the billionaire financier who was an energetic Democratic donor in the last several election cycles but is sitting this one out, is not feeling optimistic about Democratic prospects.<br /><br />“I made an exception getting involved in 2004,” Mr. Soros, 80, said in a brief interview Friday at a forum sponsored by the Bretton Woods Committee, which promotes understanding of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank</i>.....read more.....<br /><br />http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com<br />/2010/10/11/soros-i-cant-stop-a<br />-republican-avalanche/?hpSusannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-42923282104778215712010-10-12T14:42:01.946-04:002010-10-12T14:42:01.946-04:00The following was posted at Breitbart's "...The following was posted at Breitbart's "Big Government" site:<br /><br /><b>TUESDAY OPEN THREAD" UN EDITION</b><br />By PUBLIUS<br />October 12, 2010<br /><br /><i>Today, in 1960, Nikita Khrushchev pounds his shoe on a desk at the United Nations. A reminder that the UN has never been a serious place.</i><br /><br />http://biggovernment.breitbart.com/Susannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-60358739864065520012010-10-12T14:26:21.877-04:002010-10-12T14:26:21.877-04:00It is a matter of history that when the Supreme C...It is a matter of history that when the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces, General Dwight Eisenhower, found the victims of the death camps he ordered all possible photographs to be taken, and for the German people from surrounding villages to be ushered through the camps and even made to bury the dead.<br /><br />He did this because he said in words to this effect:<br /><br />'Get it all on record now - get the films - get the witnesses -because somewhere down the road of history some bastard will get up and say that this never happened'<br /><br />This week, the UK debated whether to remove The Holocaust from its school curriculum because it 'offends' the Muslim population which claims it never occurred. It is not removed as yet.. However, this is a frightening portent of the fear that is gripping the world and how easily each country is giving into it.<br /><br />It is now more than 60 years after the Second World War in Europe ended. This e-mail is being sent as a memorial chain, in memory of the,6 million Jews, 20 million Russians, 10 million Christians, and 1,900 Catholic priests Who were 'murdered, raped, burned, starved, beaten, experimented on and humiliated' while the German people looked the other way!<br /><br />Now, more than ever, with Iran , among others, claiming the Holocaust to be ?a myth,' it is imperative to make sure the world never forgets.....<br /><br />How many years will it be before the attack on the World Trade Center <br /><br />'NEVER HAPPENED',<br /><br /> <br />because it offends some Muslim in the U.S. ???Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-57311981593106779132010-10-12T13:47:22.246-04:002010-10-12T13:47:22.246-04:00BattleCreekDave
"This is like become a group...<b>BattleCreekDave</b><br /><br /><i>"This is like become a group therapy session for former Catholics."</i><br /><br />That brought a smile to my face. I've been in support groups before so I guess they are recovering from being a RC.<br /><br />I've had to recover from some of the things my church taught me too. Who hasn't?<br /><br />LucindaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-67248452657868317512010-10-12T13:46:33.970-04:002010-10-12T13:46:33.970-04:00BattleCreekDave
"This is like become a group...<b>BattleCreekDave</b><br /><br /><i>"This is like become a group therapy session for former Catholics."</i><br /><br />That brought a smile to my face. I've been in support groups before so I guess they are recovering from being a RC.<br /><br />I've had to recover from some of the things my church taught me too. Who hasn't?<br /><br />LucindaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-63537622990144807402010-10-12T12:55:04.831-04:002010-10-12T12:55:04.831-04:00BATTLE CREEK DAVID,
Sharp comment. Really enjoyed...BATTLE CREEK DAVID,<br />Sharp comment. Really enjoyed it.<br /><br />DorothyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-1099512451673179012010-10-12T09:26:13.088-04:002010-10-12T09:26:13.088-04:00Michio Kaku (the latest incarnation of Carl Sagan)...Michio Kaku (the latest incarnation of Carl Sagan) has been pushing the agenda of welcoming 'our space brothers' when they arrive. He was talking on a UK programme and mentioned the Age of Aquarius as well. It's so blatant. <br /><br />Sorry to go off topic, but I think it's all connected. Based on your research, Constance - how close do you think we are to the transforming event - whether it be economic collapse, 3rd world war or Maitreya-type event?Ruth Allannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-61772433075780719612010-10-11T23:26:30.492-04:002010-10-11T23:26:30.492-04:00Javier Solana works extremely hard.
The Antichris...Javier Solana works extremely hard.<br /><br />The Antichrist will have everything given to him.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-63866597300179374672010-10-11T22:33:54.396-04:002010-10-11T22:33:54.396-04:00Sorry about the double post. It was not intended....Sorry about the double post. It was not intended.Susannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-10461140737462284122010-10-11T22:27:19.808-04:002010-10-11T22:27:19.808-04:00The following article is related to the Bretton Wo...The following article is related to the Bretton Woods III agenda.<br /><br /><b>UN WANTS NEW GLOBAL CURRENCY TO REPLACE DOLLAR</b><br /><br /><i>The dollar should be replaced with a global currency, the United Nations has said, proposing the biggest overhaul of the world's monetary system since the Second World War. <br /><br />Sept., 2009<br /><br />In a radical report, the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) has said the system of currencies and capital rules which binds the world economy is not working properly, and was largely responsible for the financial and economic crises. <br /><br />It added that the present system, under which the dollar acts as the world's reserve currency , should be subject to a wholesale reconsideration.<br /><br />Although a number of countries, including China and Russia, have suggested replacing the dollar as the world's reserve currency, the UNCTAD report is the first time a major multinational institution has posited such a suggestion. <br /><br />In essence, the report calls for a new Bretton Woods-style system of managed international exchange rates, meaning central banks would be forced to intervene and either support or push down their currencies depending on how the rest of the world economy is behaving. <br /><br />The proposals would also imply that surplus nations such as China and Germany should stimulate their economies further in order to cut their own imbalances, rather than, as in the present system, deficit nations such as the UK and US having to take the main burden of readjustment. <br /><br />"Replacing the dollar with an artificial currency would solve some of the problems related to the potential of countries running large deficits and would help stability," said Detlef Kotte, one of the report's authors. "But you will also need a system of managed exchange rates. Countries should keep real exchange rates [adjusted for inflation] stable. Central banks would have to intervene and if not they would have to be told to do so by a multilateral institution such as the International Monetary Fund." <br /><br />The proposals, included in UNCTAD's annual Trade and Development Report , amount to the most radical suggestions for redesigning the global monetary system. <br /><br />Although many economists have pointed out that the economic crisis owed more to the malfunctioning of the post-Bretton Woods system, until now no major institution, including the G20 , has come up with an alternative.</i> <br /><br />http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance<br />/currency/6152204/UN-wants-new<br />-global-currency-to-replace<br />-dollar.htmSusannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-3483029043417128112010-10-11T22:25:18.761-04:002010-10-11T22:25:18.761-04:00The following article is related to the Bretton Wo...The following article is related to the Bretton Woods III agenda.<br /><br /><b>UN WANTS NEW GLOBAL CURRENCY TO REPLACE DOLLAR</b><br /><br /><i>The dollar should be replaced with a global currency, the United Nations has said, proposing the biggest overhaul of the world's monetary system since the Second World War. <br /><br />Sept., 2009<br /><br />In a radical report, the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) has said the system of currencies and capital rules which binds the world economy is not working properly, and was largely responsible for the financial and economic crises. <br /><br />It added that the present system, under which the dollar acts as the world's reserve currency , should be subject to a wholesale reconsideration.<br /><br />Although a number of countries, including China and Russia, have suggested replacing the dollar as the world's reserve currency, the UNCTAD report is the first time a major multinational institution has posited such a suggestion. <br /><br />In essence, the report calls for a new Bretton Woods-style system of managed international exchange rates, meaning central banks would be forced to intervene and either support or push down their currencies depending on how the rest of the world economy is behaving. <br /><br />The proposals would also imply that surplus nations such as China and Germany should stimulate their economies further in order to cut their own imbalances, rather than, as in the present system, deficit nations such as the UK and US having to take the main burden of readjustment. <br /><br />"Replacing the dollar with an artificial currency would solve some of the problems related to the potential of countries running large deficits and would help stability," said Detlef Kotte, one of the report's authors. "But you will also need a system of managed exchange rates. Countries should keep real exchange rates [adjusted for inflation] stable. Central banks would have to intervene and if not they would have to be told to do so by a multilateral institution such as the International Monetary Fund." <br /><br />The proposals, included in UNCTAD's annual Trade and Development Report , amount to the most radical suggestions for redesigning the global monetary system. <br /><br />Although many economists have pointed out that the economic crisis owed more to the malfunctioning of the post-Bretton Woods system, until now no major institution, including the G20 , has come up with an alternative.</i> <br /><br />http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance<br />/currency/6152204/UN-wants-new<br />-global-currency-to-replace<br />-dollar.htmSusannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11772087.post-78361221184837802662010-10-11T21:05:14.790-04:002010-10-11T21:05:14.790-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Ravennahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03903998005843446628noreply@blogger.com