Monday, April 11, 2005

About the Wikipedia 'Edit Wars'

What I posted on My Wikipedia User Page this day about the Javier Solana 'edit wars' - FYI

Monday, April 11, 2005

"APRIL 11, 2005 -- A FEW WORDS FROM CONSTANCE CUMBEY

April 11, 2005: Most curiously (on Wikipedia, not here!) I tried to begin a column on my personal user page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cumbey

and found myself 'logged out' without having 'logged out' after visiting another Wikipedia page to obtain a link. The user pages of my two main tormentors on Wikipedia are internally linked as on Wikipedia as "SqueakBox" and "One Salient Oversight" and are externally linked as follows:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SqueakBox
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:One_Salient_Oversight

These two, particularly SqueakBox (well named, isn't he?) have mercilessly worked to vandalize and delete my work even on other boards such as Wiki Global Alert. Then they added links to those going beyond my work to create a cartoon caricature effect of my work. Anytime I tried to defend myself on the board, Squeakbox and his numerous allies (dare I call them 'sockpuppets'?) came back whining about 'personal attacks' and erased my work while posting the curiously defective worded SqueakBox versions. I say curious because his true writing name has fully written articles with rich detail and properly spelled paragraphs and worded sentences, unlike his claimed 'machete blow to the head' handicap excuse here. http://www.marrder.com/htw/nov2000/cultural.htm

As a scholar on Solana, at this point, I may be without peer. I have read virtually everything written by him and much of it about him. I have read speeches by his brother, Luis Solana; his mother Nieves Matthews' book on the life and career of Sir Francis Bacon, several books by his grandfather, Salvador de Madariaga de Rojo, and a book by his Aunt Isabel de Madariaga on the life of Catherine the Great. I have followed his activities on nearly a daily basis via the internet since November 22, 1995, the night of an insomniac attack when I happened to discover his beginning Barcelona Process and a little more than a week later, the beginning of his NATO tenure.
Although Squeakbox, One Salient Oversight and the rest of their comrades have attempted to rewrite or obfuscate history, the following facts remain:
1. Solana's initial power base was the 15 nation European Union AND the TEN NATION WESTERN EUROPEAN UNION. Squeakbox claimed on one of his pages that he deleted the ten nation reference because it was "an evidence" that Christians could take as "the ten horns" of Daniel and Revelation;
2. Solana did conclude and sign a treaty with Israel on November 20, 1995, two days before I made his internet acquaintance.
3. Two days after the treaty was signed, the Red Sea resort area of Israel (Eilat) and surrounding Egyptian country was struck by a massive earthquake -- one like much of the material I have placed on Wikipedia, was evidently the recipient of historical revisionism. Within a week, the 7.2 mw quake was downgraded to one only 6.2 in strength.
http://www.elevator-world.com/magazine/archive01/9604-001.htm
http://www.jafi.org.il/education/jafi75/timeline8f.html#1

By the way, the actual strength of that quake was 7.2 as observed by the United States Geological Service in Golden, Colorado and the University of Michigan and University of Ohio joint seismic research center. The Ontario earthquake research center recorded its intensity as even a much stronger 7.3 mw. Its depth was such that it was considered a true global quake. If you would like to view those plates, email me your 'snail mail' address to cumbey@yahoo.com and I'll send you a PowerPoint Presentation CD Rom with that and many more interesting facts and references on Javier Solana.

Interestingly, the apparently Israeli based time line in addition to downplaying the true strength of the November 22, 1995 earthquake, also omits the November 20th signing of the Treaty of Association between Israel and the European Union, a vital component of the European Union's Barcelona Process and current European Neighborhood Policy. Why it was omitted is a matter of interesting speculation.

You may read all about the treaty and the Barcelona Process by clicking the link immediately below:

http://www.rferl.org/features/features_article_old.aspx?id=e90a2e07-99cb-40e5-b459-a761590a4915&y=2004&m=03



n the latter account was the Treaty signing of November 20, 1995.

I have placed these comments here for the benefit of those who believe Wikipedia to be a credible resource. I have noticed these things happening:

1. SqueakBox's personal attacks on me continue to stand.
2. My defenses are usually struck as 'personal attacks' on Squeakbox'
3. SqueakBox has been allowed to erase my work both on the Solana page and user comments with impunity;
4. When I deleted the personal attacks SqueakBox placed upon me, they were restored and my IP address was temporarily banned for 'vandalism' even though deleting personal attacks is allowed under Wikipedia policy (or so SqueakBox says if it is me writing about his considerable attacks upon yours truly).

This reminds me of episodes I had on Prodigy with a coven of on-line self-confessed pagans and witches back in the late 1980's. One of their number wrote me claiming to be a Christian who had read both my books. She urged me to jump to the Art section and post there, which I naively did. Then I was set upon by the community. The discussion centering about my posts grew quickly to one of the largest sections on all of Prodigy. Hours of time were wasted by me nightly in answering their verbiage cum garbage. Then somebody sent me a link to show where they were bragging about dissipating my energies and writing time by their antics. I hopped over there, and cut and pasted their comments to my private BBS. I decided to leave Prodigy and left them bewailing the loss of their fun.

For many of the same reasons, I have started my own column elsewhere on the web. No, it isn't a website. I have neither time nor resources to maintain it. You may find what I do have by clicking the following link http://www.cumbey.blogspot.com

I firmly expect that both the Rastafarians and the Christian false brethren will follow me over there. So be it. If ignorance reigns about Javier Solana, I don't want it to be my fault. If they want it on their eternal shoulders, that's their choice!

Oh, and by the way is Javier Solana either/or the 'anti-Christ' or the 'prophesied destroyer of the Jews of Daniel? Dunno -- your guess is as good as mine. It's just that from where I currently sit, he might be an educated guess. But then again, so was Hitler.

Only time -- and events -- will tell!

CONSTANCE E. CUMBEY

47 comments:

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

[http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:Ln26BY1EVUkJ:www.holysmoke.org/wb/wb0274.htm++hate+group+constance+cumbey&hl=en&lr=lang_en|lang_es&client=firefox-a]

Anonymous said...

truly fantastically wonderfully brilliant, and clearly inspired by God. I must go and tell all my hate group friends to come and read your thoughts

Anonymous said...

Who is Javier Solana?

Anonymous said...

What do you suggest we do to remedy the situation at wikipedia, from a secret admirer

Anonymous said...

Well I believe every word you said. he must be the antichrist. Your evidence and deep scholarship are completely and utterly overwhelming. I am impressed to say the least of it. You must have worked very hard, but then you come across as an exceptionally hard worker and very well informed on this blog as well as all your comments at wikipedia, and of course your truly fantastic article. I don't know why anyone objected to what is obviously a classic. Bye for now!

Anonymous said...

Seriously thought out scholarship. I hate the antichrist and all these whingeing Europeans who just want to have a say in the world and stop us Americabns conquering the world which is clearly our God given right and duty. We must stop Solana before it is too late and those Europeans start wanting a say in how the world is run. this man is dangerous. I will right and tell the President

Anonymous said...

Foam foam grrhhhhhhhhhhhh

Anonymous said...

aaaggghhhhhhhhhh

Anonymous said...

You are truly the most fantastically intelligent and hard working ever and ever. utterly god inspired. What is all this about hate groups? Only those who love the Lord shall be saved.

Anonymous said...

Thanks so very very much for giving us the truth about Solana. those silly fools ddon't realise that this is all so much more important than a silly old encyclopedia. Don't you think?

Anonymous said...

Thanks so very very much for giving us the truth about Solana. those silly fools ddon't realise that this is all so much more important than a silly old encyclopedia. Don't you think?

Anonymous said...

Thanks so very very much for giving us the truth about Solana. those silly fools ddon't realise that this is all so much more important than a silly old encyclopedia. Don't you think?

Anonymous said...

Thanks so very very much for giving us the truth about Solana. those silly fools ddon't realise that this is all so much more important than a silly old encyclopedia. Don't you think?

Anonymous said...

Thanks so very very much for giving us the truth about Solana. those silly fools ddon't realise that this is all so much more important than a silly old encyclopedia. Don't you think?

Anonymous said...

i found your article to be nothing but drivel.

Anonymous said...

I agree with the last person. very pathetic

Anonymous said...

I love the lord. How can i help?

Anonymous said...

Most people in the US and the world have no idea who Solana is. That's strange because his role in the European Union is very powerful. One would think that main stream media people would have had a bio on him in all of the major outlets. So here you come, presenting nine years of research on him in a wonderfully succint article and a little twit with pull at Wikipedia who obviously has done no research based on his edits wants to put his label on it after moving a few periods around. In the real world it's called plagerism. At Wikipedia it's called operating the memory hole via anonymous editors.

It's easy to see which commenters have no idea who Solana is as they have are unable to comment other than by grunts. Perhaps the twit has brought them over by the busload from Wikipedia.

Anonymous said...

All we are trying to do at Wikipedia is to have accurate and truthful information about various topics. While I do not accept the belief that Solana is the Antichrist, I do respect the rights of those who do. Unfortunately the problem with the Javier Solana article was that we (Squeakbox and I) honestly believe that the contributions you have made are NOT encyclopedic. You may class this as part of the whole conspiracy if you like, but we HAVE created an article titled "Javier Solana Antichrist allegations" to ensure that these views are recorded accurately.

I have managed to convince others at Wikipedia that a separate article was needed. Hal Lindsey, for example, has mentioned the possibility that Solana may be the Antichrist, and HE is far more respected and well known than you are as an end-times exponent. It was THAT which convinced me that an article was needed.

Please therefore edit the "Javier Solana Antichrist allegations" article so that these allegations are recorded faithfully. I will edit it as well, and ensure that a balanced perspective is maintained.

I do not wish ill will for you or anyone here. I am frustrated that things have got as bad as they have. If anyone would like to contact me about this (and NOT be abusive), then please email me at: one_salient_oversight@yahoo.com.au

Yours in Christ,

One Salient Oversight

Anonymous said...

I have been following the Solana article for some time. Since it was SB who was so interested in the supposed connection between Solana and the titles Beast or Antichrist that he introduced it as a topic though it never appeared in the encyclopedic information on Solana, I would suggest you put him in charge of all Antichrist articles and leave Constance Cumbey to put forth her neutral research on Solana. It is obvious that you haven't done even one months research on Solana, yet you jumped on the SB bandwagon early on.

Signing a comment "Yours in Christ" doesn't automatically put you in the neutral camp.

Anonymous said...

We love your succinctness down here in alabama. you must have a tremendous memory memorizing all that in just one brain. A truly phenomenal feat

Anonymous said...

I am gushing with praise for your greta feat of writing an article only to have it ruined. Everyone knows the Barcelona Conference is the most important event since the resurrection of Jesus, and that this man threatens christianity and all that wee hold dear with his nasty europeans. can we join your HATE GROUP?

Anonymous said...

Can I be a Sergeant in your HATE GROUP?

Anonymous said...

If you ask me the devil is behind all this.

Anonymous said...

Can we please get serious

Anonymous said...

I think Constance fraudently used Wikipedia to promote her own ideas

Anonymous said...

Can we have some HATE GROUP encouragement, or have I come to the wrong place?

Anonymous said...

I think the twit guy is totaally right. you only have to look at the conciseness of her writing and how packed full of intersesting and utterly necessary information every sentence if not every word was. I agree, we should put SB in charge of wikipedia, just give him the key, then nobody will get to know the truth

Anonymous said...

I did hear that SqueakBox is a very important person

Anonymous said...

I vote SqueakBox

Anonymous said...

Me too SB is just the gretaest

Anonymous said...

I vote for Cumbey

Anonymous said...

Cumbey for President

Anonymous said...

SqueakBox for Prime Minister

Anonymous said...

I thought SqueakBox's work was utterly profound. not like Cumbey's.

Anonymous said...

I totally and utterly and completely dizagree. i think Cumbeys work was utterly profound not like that squeakBoxs

Anonymous said...

Why don't we have a photo of Constance's dogs to see whose are the more beautiful. Cumbey's or SqueakBox's.

Anonymous said...

m

Anonymous said...

no you can't

Anonymous said...

I'm sure there are sane people reading this blog. Constance is facing this onslaught by the uninformed because they have little else to do with their time. Her book, which came out in the early '80s was translated in many foreign languages. No one would bother to translate the words of most of the commenters into a foreign language. Each country has its own stupids to contend with.

To the sane, value this information as you will find it of much value as you continue to learn what is happening.

Anonymous said...

I really don't know anyone on the planet who has more credentials to write an encyclopedic article on Solana. I'm also sure that she took great pains to make it as scholarly and accurate as possible.

Anyway, the separate article Javier Solana Antichrist allegations is a disgrace! Does the author of that dribble expect anyone with a modicum of familiarity with the Bible to take this statement seriously: "Many Christian fundamentalists believe that there is a biblical prophecy that there will be an Antichrist." That's completely incorrect, talk about bias! We don't just believe that there is biblical prophecies that talk about an Antichrist; there is prophecies that predict the Antichrist! One doesn't even have to be a "fundamentalist" to understand this, as the author of that statement calls them, because it is written plainly for anyone who can even read the Bible.

Anonymous said...

Wikipedia is open to anyone who isn't barred from using it (you have to do something wriong for that), so why not edit the allegations article. Constance is as free to edit the Solana article as SqueakBox. I don't understand what she is whingeing on about. Perhaps she is too lazy to argue with SqueakBox about his edits on the discussion page. Very odd behavior, though I am surprised at how poular this blog is.

Anonymous said...

4:12 Anonymous - Having read the various pages, it is clear there is no discussing anything with SqueakBox. He responds as if he is Judge and Jury and God help you if you make a change, delete or attempt to add anything new since he came on the scene. His tactics are abomidable. It's obvious from reading the various pages that he has deliberately frustrated other contributors with very high-handed tactics. Two rather telling comments: One person said he left Wikipedia because it had a Lord of the Flies atmosphere and another said it felt like the Old Boys club. A person can learn a lot by reading the various pages the administrative volunteers use.

Unknown said...

www0716
nike air max 90
michael kors outlet
adidas wings
fitflops sale
oakley sunglasses
air huarache
nike foamposite
cheap jordans
canada goose outlet
ugg outlet

Unknown said...

www1005

christian louboutin
christian louboutin shoes
ultra boost 3.0
off white jordan
coach outlet
christian louboutin
james harden shoes
hugo boss
fitflops clearance
dsquared2

zzyytt said...

jordan 12
yeezy boost 350
michael kors purses
curry 4
kobe 9
cheap jordan shoes
adidas superstar shoes
nike air max 90
yeezy boost 350 v2
nike outlet